Mac Pro 2.66 dual core xeon & FCX

Hey guys,
I'm trying to run Final Cut X but my Mac Pro needs a new open CL graphics card and I can't locate anything that will fit my Mac Pro
Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
My Mac is a:
Mac Pro 2.66 Dual core Xeon

Read these and watch video
Also, if you read the comment section under this link on the APPLE store people tell yopu their experiences
http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC742ZM/A
AND
http://blog.macsales.com/6856-owc-reveals-which-radeon-video-cards-work-with-200 6-2009-mac-pros
Or watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUh0uvUHn68
And if you feel like reading more
http://www.barefeats.com/wst10g5.html

Similar Messages

  • Mac Pro 2.66 Dual Core Intel Xeon (April 2007) - Hard Drive Upgrade

    My hard drive is making rather worrying clicking noises so I think it's time to (very quickly) pick up a new drive.
    I'm a little confused about what kind of drive I should order. The drive it came with is a Seagate Barracuda ATA. Would anyone be kind enough to advise if I would be able to use an SATA II drive? I'm looking at the WD Caviar Black 1TB as they seem to have good reviews.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated...

    Please excuse my ignorance but when I look at my drive in about my Mac it says ATA. There wouldn't be any issues given this is an older Mac Pro from April 2007?
    There is an ATA section in System Profiler (from "About This Mac"'s "More Info" button), but it for the optical drives. The hard drives are in the "Serial-ATA" section.

  • My 2006 Mac Pro (2.66 Dual-Core) graphics card has died on me...

    After the loading screen, I usually get some form of this (Screen flickering and repeating itself) so I assume this is due to my graphics card not working properly?
    I have a GeForce 7300 GT in my Mac Pro now and I'm wondering what to do now? Since I need a new GC, I might as well upgrade so what is the best card my computer can handle right now?
    Also what are my other options if I wanted to upgrade my processors?
    Any help is appreciated.

    Every Mac Pro model running 10.6.4 or later can accept the Apple/ATI 5770, which uses one aux power cord. In the Mac Pro 1,1 (2006) or Mac Pro 2,1 (2007) they run slightly slower than their full rated speed due to PCIe 1 slots.
    Be sure you get the version with Apple firmware, or it will not work under Mac OS X. Flashed PC cards will not light up until Mac OS X is fully loaded and running, making them useless when debugging.

  • 1st Generation Mac Pro 2.66 dual Core(4 cores total) 5gigs of RAM

    I'm still on Logic 8/Tiger. All running very well. Typical projects run about 30 tracks. Use lots of Vi's Omnisphere, Trillian, and RMX included.
    Wanting to move to 10.6.2/Logic 9.1. Is my first generation Mac Pro up for the upgrade? Will I still have plenty of juice?
    4 drives(OS, audio, samples, and backup)
    Thanks for any input!
    Message was edited by: Gearjunkeee

    I also have a similar set-up but with 8 GB's RAM. I kept the old HDD with the Leopard 10.5.8 and Logic 9.02. Installed a new HDD then did the upgrade. To be honest, it was a PAINFUL process re-loading in all of the software plus updating the software! But, for me at least (knock on wood), I've had no problems with Snow Leopard and Logic 9.1. My first "test" was to run my lastes sequencing project which has a total of 30 virtual instruments and plug-ins from various companies (Kontakt 2.5 Player, Music Lab, "External Instruments", Audio Ease's Altiverb, Universal Audio plug-ins) and all worked well. Now, to be very clear, please realize that this was only 1 "test". But I noticed right-away better usage of the CPU than the previous version. For the previous versions (Leopard 10.5.8 with Logic 9.02) of this one "test" I had to set the buffer to 512 in order to do a problem-free mix-down. But with the upgrade of Snow Leopard/Logic Pro combo, I was able to mix down this project with a buffer setting set to 128. (I'm quite happy with that setting.)
    FYI, I'm using Logic Pro 9.1 in 32-bit mode. I tried the 64-bit mode, but some of my plug-ins didn't work in that mode (Music Lab's RealStrat and RealLPC, which I tend to use frequently.) But I'm happy using 32-bit mode, especially using Native-Instrument's Kontakt 4.04. Again, all works well.
    Just thought I would share a positive experiece with the upgrades. Good luck with your decision.

  • Card Swap From Mac Pro to G5(dual core)

    My friend is interested in putting in the newer, yet to be released ATI Radeon X1900 XT 512MB card into his MacPro, leaving him with the stock Nvidia GeForce 7300GT 256 card sitting around and doing nothing. Do you think I could replace the NVIDIA GeForce 6600 LE in my Dual Core G5 with the old 7300?

    Nope, won't work. The ROM on the MacPro card is designed for systems that use EFI. It won't work on the G5, which uses Open Firmware.

  • Mac Pro 1,1 dual-core intel xeon 2.66Ghz, NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT OSX 10.5.8 hangs on boot, can boot in safe mode, disc permissions verified, disc verified.  Please help me start it normally?

    Hi there, when I turn on my computer it just hangs on a grey screen with an apple logo.  I didn't install any new software on purpose lately.  It initially froze when I moved the mouse to get rid of the screensaver where it had been behaving normally.  When the screen saver went away the screen was messed up and everything was frozen and the date and time were huge and distorted.  I did a hard reset and I'm just stuck on that grey screen.  If I leave it for hours one of the screens turns blue and the other is black, but I can move the mouse.  A ghostly image of the cursor is stuck in the top left corner of the screen,
    I can boot into safe mode and everything is normal.  I reset the PRAM.  I verified the discs and the permissions.  I don't seem to have any data loss.  When I restart normally I still get the grey screen.  The only weird thing in the console is 24/09/09 10:59:27 AM kernel unknown SIGSEGV code 0 .  I would really like my computer to work.  Thank you.

    Have you run the check for non-Apple kernel extensions suggested above?
    It's easy, you just cut-and-paste the command into terminal. If there is any output, you just cut-and paste it back in here.
    Linc Davis suggests this as a way to find those non-Apple extensions:
    Please copy or drag -- *don't type* -- the following command into a Terminal window, press Return, and post the output (if any):
    kextstat -kl | awk ' !/apple/ { print $6 } '

  • I have a Mac Pro 4,1 quad core intel Xeon running mac OSX 10.6.8 and I have just moved studios and now need to use the Internet wirelessly but there's no airport facilities on this model can anyone tell me what model of airport card I would need for this

    I have a Mac Pro 4,1 quad core intel Xeon running mac OSX 10.6.8 and I have just moved studios and now need to use the Internet wirelessly but there's no airport facilities on this model can anyone tell me what model of airport card I would need for this mac

    Instead of getting a wireless card for the Mac Pro, you might want to consider getting an 802.11ac wireless bridge device that would enable you to connect more than one device to it by Ethernet cable and to eventually take advantage of the faster 802.11ac wireless standard.

  • Windows 7 32-bit not booting after installation... Mac Pro 2,1 Quad Core 2.66

    I am trying to install Windows 7 Home Premium 32 bit on my 2006 Mac Pro (Upgraded to 2,1 firmware). However after the installation has been completed and the computer restarts it just reboots back to the start of the Windows set up installation process. If I restart it and select the Windows disk drive at start up with the install disc removed disc drive then all I get is a black screen with a flashing underscore in the top left corner.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Computer Specs:
    Mac Pro (Early 2006) 2,1 firmware
    2x 2.66 GHz Dual-Core Xeon
    8 GB 667 MHz DRR2 Ram
    Nvidia GeForce 7300 GT
    OS X Lion 10.7.5

    While not same scenario, the chart you'll see is useful.
    Going from Vista U. 64 to W. 7 64 Home Prem. I unknowingly lost support for more than 1 processer
    See maximum physical CPUs supported below.
    In Vista U. Mac Pro 3.1. Task Manager showed 8 performance graphs (1 graph per cpu/mem).
    in Winndows 7 Home Prem., there are 4.
    Scroll down to edition comparison chart.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows7editions

  • Recently switched from powermac to mac pro5 2x2.66GHz 6 -core xeon   running FCP 7 on OS 10.6.8  exporting qt files and rendering project files now takes longer than my old machine   looking at activity mon and % of user is aroun 6 and % of idle around 42

    recently switched from powermac to mac pro5 2x2.66GHz 6 -core xeon   running FCP 7 on OS 10.6.8  exporting qt files and rendering project files now takes longer than my old machine   looking at activity mon and % of user is aroun 6 and % of idle around 42  are all the cores being used with FCP7?

    johnnyapplesod wrote:
    exporting qt files and rendering project files now takes longer than my old machine
    It's because the PowerMac G5 had HUGE bandwidth with a fat BUS on each processsor so they could run hard, hot and heavy.
    It's not so with the Intel processors which are multi-core and share a common bus thus bottleneck.
    The newer Intel processors can do more work on the CPU, but when it comes to in/out they are s-l-o-w.
    I've had a wickedly fast dual processor (not dual core) G5, RAID 0 pair of 10,000 RPM drives as boot and a fast video card, I could do a lot very very fast.
    You'll likely have to upgrade to Final Cut X to get more cores utilized, prepare to cry a little bit, Apple is working on the features they stripped out of it to make amends to pro users who complained loudly. (all over TV too)
    http://www.loopinsight.com/2011/09/20/apple-releases-major-update-to-final-cut-p ro-x-release-demo-version/

  • Mac Pro 2.66 Quad-Core 1GBRAM, how much more RAM and HOW?

    I just got my Mac Pro 2.66 Quad-Core, and I had a budget so I left the RAM down @ only 1GB because I knew I could upgrade it later. Well later is here & I want to put more in it, but I hear it is a little more complicated than the sensless shoving of big ram chips into empty slots...
    I am a heavy user of Logic 7, soon to be of Logic Studio, and hopefully I will be using AutoCAD at home soon (for school). How much RAM would be optimal for me to eventually have? Right now I think I can afford to purchase 2GB more, but I dont know how exactly to put it into my machine. Right now it has a 512MB per xeon.
    Can anyone help me out?

    I just pulled out 1GB (2 x 512MB) simms in replaced them with 4GB (2 x 2GB) simms.
    I had added more memory as 2 GB (1x2GB) and ran out of space. Now I have a total of 11GB RAM:
    1GB = 2 x 512MB
    2GB = 2 x 1GB
    8GB = 4 x 2GB
    Leaving me with 2x512MB simms sitting in the box on the self. Sure wish I knew someone local I could give these things to for a reasonable price. Anyway, I wouldn't go any higher than 2GB simms (4GB) as that seems to currently have the best price/space ratio. Crucial is good enough and order it from NewEgg.com or MacConnection.com and you'll get a good price (I got mine at MacConnection.com).

  • HI, I HAVE A MacBook Pro 2.3GHz dual-core Intel i5 AND I WAN'T TO UPGRADE THE HARD DRIVE UP TO 750GB AND ALSO THE RAM MEMORY TO 8GB. WHAT SPECIFIC MODEL OF HARD DRIVE AND RAM MEMORY SHOULD I BUY??? THANKS

    HI, I HAVE A MacBook Pro 2.3GHz dual-core Intel i5 AND I WAN'T TO UPGRADE THE HARD DRIVE UP TO 750GB AND ALSO THE RAM MEMORY TO 8GB. WHAT SPECIFIC MODEL OF HARD DRIVE AND RAM MEMORY SHOULD I BUY??? THANKS

    No need to type in all caps - we HEAR you!
    I would take a look at the internal drives offered by both Crucial (click the link "Internal Hard Drives Now Available") and OWC. I would stay away from Western Digital drives as they seem to have problems on a number of Mac models.
    You can also shop for RAM at Crucial and OWC - just select the System Scanner tab at the Crucial website to find out which memory is right for your machine.
    Good luck,
    Clinton

  • I have a Mac pro 1,1 duel core purchased around 2007. I am unable to update to X Mavericks. Any way around it? the mac pro is in great condition!

    I need to upgrade to OS X Mavericks. my mac was purchased around 2007, its a Macpro1,2 dual-core Xeon 2.66 Ghz, is there any way to get around the apple store telling you this version is not supported for this mac?

    As you can see here, Mavericks is not supported on your machine.
    OS X Mavericks: System Requirements
    You could sell this machine and buy something more current.

  • Would I notice a difference between a dual 3.2 MAC PRO and a dual 3.0 Mac P

    Would I notice a difference between a dual 3.2 MAC PRO and a dual 3.0 Mac Pro. Looking to add another MAC PRO to my studio just wondering if there would be a noticeable difference between my dual 3.0 quad core and the 3.2 dual quad core??
    Thanks
    John

    Using mostly FCP and Illustrator CS 3. Really do not need anymore performance for what I am doing but I need to add another station and wonder if the 3.2 would be a better performer. My current system is a 3.0 dual with quad cores. If the 3.2 would be a better performer then I would install the new system in my main suite.
    Thanks
    John

  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 1GB for Mac Pro 2.66 Quad Core Xenon

    I have the option of picking up an ATI Radeon HD 4870 1 GB graphics card to go with my soon-to-be-new MAc Pro 2.66 Quad core. I see know that Apple can upgrade to ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB, but that card is not available to me at the moment. Will the 1GB do the job without overheating the system? Am new to the Mac Pros. Need it for the Windows gaming portion of the system. Am using the rest for graphics and photography.

    If the MAc Pro 2.66 comes with Snow Leopard, why would I have to upgrade my OS?
    OK. So, if got the MAc version, it would work A-OK without overheating?
    Thanks for your input!

  • Mac pro 2.66 Quad Core - boot drive mirrored, replace?

    All,
    I have a Mac Pro 2.66 Quad Core system.
    I got all 'sexy' when I set it up - loaded four 1-TB drives in the 4 bays, Mirrored the boot set, also mirrored the secondary set for data.
    I am getting ready to have these guys filled up (I do lots of video, pics, etc), and am thinking about 'growing' the drives to 2TB or even 3TB disks (mirrored of course, I'm paranoid).
    So I am thinking about the 'how' of moving my data to the larger drive, getting things set up.  I have not had any of the drives fail, so I haven't needed to do a swap out yet.
    Can I simply take out one of the mirrored boot drives, put in a larger drive, and it will then rebuild the mirror?
    or if anyone has some info they can point me to, I'd appreciate it.
    thx

    You cannot just add a larger drive and grow your RAID Volume size. You need to create an empty larger RAID Volume and COPY the data to the larger Volume, e.g., from your Backups.
    Mirrored RAID is NOT Backup. It merely extends the time to repair to keep a drive failure from becoming a data disaster. RAID gives you no protection from human error, crazy software or file problems that happen "just because". You still need backup.
    One of the best ways to get increased performance from a computer with the ability to support multiple Internal drives is to keep only System, Library, Applications, and the hidden unix files including paging/swap on the Boot Drive, and move everything else off. This dramatically reduces competition for the Boot Drive and everything speeds up. A Velociraptor is a little faster, and an SSD is incrementally faster still.
    If that is all that is on the Boot Drive, you do not need to RAID it, since it can be reproduced from DVDs or downloads in short order. All your User files and Preferences are on other drives..
    Implementing this would suggest a single small fast Boot Drive, typically with an offline clone as Backup for emergencies, and forget about RAID-ing the Boot Drive.

Maybe you are looking for