Mac Pro 8-core Power Supply Making Humming Noise That Comes And Goes

This is in reference to a Mac Pro 3,1 8-core purchased around Feb 2008.
Lately, I've noticed a strange noise coming from my power supply that sounds like the noise a refrigerator radiator makes. It's a humming noise that rapidly comes and goes, constantly.
The power supply fan speed is running at 599rpm
I'm not sure if the problem could've been caused by adding additional ram (12GB, OWC) or an additional HDD (3rd HDD, WD), but I didn't really notice the noise until after adding these components.
What could be the cause of this problem? What are my repair options if necessary (without Apple Care)?
Thanks in advance.

I know for a fact it is not any of my hard drives because the noise is becoming more frequent no matter what hard drive I use, I actually have a 1.5tb, a 1tb, two 500gb and two 320gb drives, I have set an appointment to take my system in and have it tested, it is starting to crash 5-6 times a day. I can not get a lot of work done with this annoying spinning noise and the shutting down. Thank god for my Apple care, and I have visited various forums that lead me to believe its the power supply going out, with the symptoms it is having. This article and others like it explain what to look for when a power supply is going bad.
http://www.smartcomputing.com/editorial/article.asp?article=articles/archive/r07 04/24r04/24r04.asp

Similar Messages

  • Mac Pro Quad core power and cooling concerns

    My current MDD 867 is getting a bit long in the tooth. I am looking at getting a quad mac pro this fall. Waiting till MacWorld is a verrrrry long wait option. Did I mention that the MDD cooked off one of my drives recently?
    What I plan on building is the following :
    Mac Pro Quad 3 GHz
    4 Gb ram
    Ati X1900 (extra cooling fan?)
    250 GB boot drive
    500 GB Barracuda mirror raid
    16X SuperDrive
    Knowing the power and cooling issues that the MDD has intimately, this new machine configuration gives me pause. Can anyone attest to the power and cooling capabilities of the Mac Pro? Will the above configuration be ok? How about possible fan speed noise? The MDD, with new power supply is a noise beast!
    TIA
    Poirot

    Thanks for the reply.
    To be a a little more clear, when I referred to quad, I meant 2x dual-core processors.
    The raid was for storage of my images. I have an external firewire drive for backups of the system drive, and other important files. Photography is my hobby, and need to build a new workstation to store and edit the images.
    The UPS was a good idea. That was in the back of my mind. I could try and bring an APC SU2200XL from work
    I was hoping that Apple would announce the new Mac Pro this fall. I know that the raw processor speed difference is not that much, but the FSB speed difference could make a nice improvement. I just didn't want to get one now, and then 10 days later, there is a new one. I would be really mad at myself. I was looking at the refurb models. The price difference between the 4 and 8 core models is $100, when available. The downside is that the 8-core model does not come with the Ati card.
    The allure of Leopard is not that strong to me. We are running the beta at work, and while nice, it is still too buggy.
    The main intent of the thread was to make sure that the specs'd out model would not generate too much heat, and suck up too much power from the power supply. I know that the MDD compared tot he Mac Pro is night and day, but a little reassurance is always helpful.
    Thanks
    Mack

  • New Mac Pro (6 core, D700, 32GB), Mavericks 10.9.4, dragging and scrolling lag, overall system bugginess

    Since upgrading to 10.9.4 i've been beset with numerous bugs and general odd system behavior.
    Previous to this update I had experience lag when using my Wacom Intuos 4 tablet. For example when doing a preview render in Maya the tablet would become unresponsive and laggy. This never occurred on my old Mac Pro 2008.
    I noticed there was an update to the Wacom Drivers (6.3.8-2) so I did the update. After updating I've been experiencing dramatically slow screen redraw. So whenever I drag a window or scroll, the image stutters, flickers and lags as it tries to redraw to keep up with mouse position. This makes it impossible to use the computer.
    I uninstalled the Wacom drivers and the lag and redraw errors persist. I looked at Activity Monitor to if it was some other system resource like Spotlight that was momentarily hogging resources. The only thing I notice is that the dreaded "kernel_task" seems to be using a lot of ram (1.46 GB) and cpu time (usually at the top of the list). Also, "com.apple.IconServicesAgent" seems to be using a lot of CPU time (usually #2 in the list).
    I'm at a loss as to what to do about this other than re-install everything from scratch. I've read through numerous forum threads about the kernel_task issue but nothing seems to apply to the New Mac Pro.
    Hopefully someone has some experience with these issues and some good advice for fixes.
    Jonathan
    Here's my EtreCheck system report:
    EtreCheck version: 1.9.15 (52)
    Report generated August 26, 2014 at 11:34:29 AM EDT
    Hardware Information: ?
      Mac Pro (Late 2013) (Verified)
      Mac Pro - model: MacPro6,1
      1 3.5 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon E5 CPU: 6 cores
      32 GB RAM
    Video Information: ?
      AMD FirePro D700 - VRAM: 6144 MB
      AMD FirePro D700 - VRAM: 6144 MB
      DELL3007WFPHC 2560 x 1600
    System Software: ?
      OS X 10.9.4 (13E28) - Uptime: 0 days 0:18:8
    Disk Information: ?
      APPLE SSD SM0512F disk0 : (500.28 GB)
      S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
      EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted>: 209.7 MB
      Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / [Startup]: 499.42 GB (237.99 GB free)
      Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>: 650 MB
    USB Information: ?
      Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
      Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
      Tablet PTK-640
      Samsung Samsung ML-2510 Series
      Generic Flash Card Reader
    Thunderbolt Information: ?
      Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus_2
      Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus_1
      Promise Technology, Inc. Pegasus2-R
      Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus_0
    Configuration files: ?
      /etc/sysctl.conf - Exists
    Gatekeeper: ?
      Anywhere
    Kernel Extensions: ?
      [loaded] at.obdev.nke.LittleSnitch (4052 - SDK 10.8) Support
      [loaded] com.nvidia.CUDA (1.1.0) Support
      [loaded] com.promise.driver.stex (5.2.7 - SDK 10.9) Support
      [not loaded] com.silabs.driver.CP210xVCPDriver (3.0.0d1) Support
      [not loaded] com.silabs.driver.CP210xVCPDriver64 (3.0.0d1) Support
      [not loaded] com.wacom.kext.pentablet (5.2.6) Support
      [not loaded] com.wacom.kext.wacomtablet (6.3.8 - SDK 10.9) Support
    Startup Items: ?
      CUDA: Path: /System/Library/StartupItems/CUDA
    Launch Daemons: ?
      [running] at.obdev.littlesnitchd.plist Support
      [loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist Support
      [running] com.autodesk.backburner_manager.plist Support
      [running] com.autodesk.backburner_server.plist Support
      [loaded] com.autodesk.backburner_start.plist Support
      [running] com.edb.launchd.postgresql-8.4.plist Support
      [loaded] com.oracle.java.Helper-Tool.plist Support
      [loaded] com.oracle.java.JavaUpdateHelper.plist Support
      [loaded] com.promise.bgasched.plist Support
      [running] com.promise.BGPMain_R.plist Support
      [loaded] com.promise.emaild.plist Support
      [running] com.solidangle.rlm.plist Support
    Launch Agents: ?
      [running] at.obdev.LittleSnitchUIAgent.plist Support
      [not loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist Support
      [running] com.adobe.AdobeCreativeCloud.plist Support
      [loaded] com.nvidia.CUDASoftwareUpdate.plist Support
      [loaded] com.oracle.java.Java-Updater.plist Support
      [running] com.wacom.pentablet.plist Support
      [not loaded] com.wacom.wacomtablet.plist Support
    User Launch Agents: ?
      [loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist Support
      [loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist Support
      [loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist Support
      [loaded] net.jonstovell.keepeSATATest1TBSpinning.plist Support
    User Login Items: ?
      iTunesHelper
      ChronoSyncBackgrounder
      Dropbox
    Internet Plug-ins: ?
      AdobeAAMDetect: Version: AdobeAAMDetect 2.0.0.0 - SDK 10.7 Support
      FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 14.0.0.176 - SDK 10.6 Support
      Default Browser: Version: 537 - SDK 10.9
      AdobePDFViewerNPAPI: Version: 11.0.07 - SDK 10.6 Support
      AdobePDFViewer: Version: 11.0.07 - SDK 10.6 Support
      Flash Player: Version: 14.0.0.176 - SDK 10.6 Support
      QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
      WacomNetscape: Version: Unknown
      WacomTabletPlugin: Version: WacomTabletPlugin 2.1.0.6 - SDK 10.9 Support
      JavaAppletPlugin: Version: Java 7 Update 67 Check version
    Audio Plug-ins: ?
      BluetoothAudioPlugIn: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.9
      AirPlay: Version: 2.0 - SDK 10.9
      AppleAVBAudio: Version: 203.2 - SDK 10.9
      iSightAudio: Version: 7.7.3 - SDK 10.9
    iTunes Plug-ins: ?
      Quartz Composer Visualizer: Version: 1.4 - SDK 10.9
    User Internet Plug-ins ?
      Aspera Web 3.3.3.81344: Version: (null) - SDK 10.6 Support
    3rd Party Preference Panes: ?
      CUDA Preferences  Support
      Flash Player  Support
      Java  Support
      WacomTablet  Support
    Time Machine: ?
      Time Machine not configured!
    Top Processes by CPU: ?
          1% Activity Monitor
          1% WindowServer
          1% fontd
          0% sysmond
          0% Creative Cloud
    Top Processes by Memory: ?
      164 MB Safari
      131 MB com.apple.IconServicesAgent
      98 MB mds_stores
      98 MB WindowServer
      98 MB Creative Cloud
    Virtual Memory Information: ?
      27.51 GB Free RAM
      1.99 GB Active RAM
      548 MB Inactive RAM
      1.95 GB Wired RAM
      548 MB Page-ins
      0 B Page-outs

    You have installed all these non-Apple system modifications:
    Kernel Extensions: ?
      [loaded] at.obdev.nke.LittleSnitch (4052 - SDK 10.8) Support
      [loaded] com.nvidia.CUDA (1.1.0) Support
      [loaded] com.promise.driver.stex (5.2.7 - SDK 10.9) Support
      [not loaded] com.silabs.driver.CP210xVCPDriver (3.0.0d1) Support
      [not loaded] com.silabs.driver.CP210xVCPDriver64 (3.0.0d1) Support
      [not loaded] com.wacom.kext.pentablet (5.2.6) Support
      [not loaded] com.wacom.kext.wacomtablet (6.3.8 - SDK 10.9) Support
    Litlle snitch has been a bad actor for some users.
    You do not have any CUDA Hardware, so the CUDA Driver is not needed.
    I do not know what siLabs driver thinks it may be driving.
    You left the door open:
    Gatekeeper: ?
      Anywhere

  • Early 2008 Mac Pro (8 core) Cabinet Noise

    I noted that this discussion was archived, without a solution being posted.  Many people seem to be experiencing this odd Mac Pro noise that comes and goes. Some users say it is a fan, some the PSU, others say its the disk drives.
    I have experienced this noise for years.  While some of us will of course have different causes, I found my problem, but as yet do not have a fix that I like. Given the cost of a Mac Pro, for their overkill cabinet to have a noise problem that impacts mutiple (many?) users is ridiculous.  My son's $750 HP desktop makes no noise.  Apple, are you listening?
    My noise, a loud buzzing that stops and starts at random (and will go away on its own for weeks) stops when the side cover is removed.  I added black electrical tape at all spots where the cover touches the case, but no change.  Then I put tape vertically down the rear latch for the cover and the noise was gone.  It returned months later (tape came slightly loose?) and I then fixed the noise by not closing the latch all the way.  So far so good, but this a lousy way to "fix" something.
    My system has all four drive bays full.  Three of the drives are third party hardware.
    I blame the case/latch engineering and Apple is the responsible party.  I wonder if they re-engineered the latch in later models, as the complaints seem centered around the early 2008 eight-core.
    I hope this helps others.

    I had the same sound, i also had drive in all 4 bays, i think once i fixed it by making sure the drive were all the way in, i have noticed it hasnt come back in the last month or so since i got my SSD. Its a shame this thing has an issue like this, since otherwise i love the case ( it looks like it could take a bullit for me )

  • After effects performance issues on mac pro 12-core

    Hello everyone,
    I feel as if i keep making similar posts to this, but for some reason i am still not satisfied with my machine. Im using a mac pro 12-core 2.4GHz with 40gigs of ram installed and a ATI Radeon 5770 graphics card.
    I finally got around to getting my SSD set up and i have all of my applications installed on it along with the OS. i also have all of my cache files set to my WD hard drive so I'm not clogging up my 120GB SSD. My SSD has 40gigs left so i figure i shouldn't go any lower than that to keep the performance of the drive at its fullest potential.
    I do a lot of work in after effects CS6 and i feel that the machine is still going slow.. I was working on a project last night and when i went to do a RAM preview i kept getting the beach ball and after effects would glitch up.. what would be the main cause of this? could it have been that the destination file i was working with was on my WD drive and not the SSD?
    I don't know what it is i need to keep adding to this machine to finally be satisfied with its performance.. My next investment would most likely be a GTX 570 to enable CUDA cores for open GL rendering, but i still feel that i should still be getting great performance now.
    Any suggestions? maybe I'm doing something wrong?
    Thanks in advance!

    Rick is talking about After Effects Multiprocessing.  You can turn it off and on here:
    Also, you've only reserved 3 GB out of 40 GB for other applications.  Other apps on your computer also need memory to work and setting this number so low could cause these apps to fight with After Effects over the available memory causing AE to slow down. I would suggest starting with that number a lot higher, possibly around 10 GB.  Then do a bunch of render tests to see what the best settings are for your machine. 
    I also highly recommend watching the "Using 'Render Multiple Frames Simultaneously' Multiprocessing" tutorial by Adobe employee Todd Kopriva on Video2Brain for more information.  If you really want to learn more about getting the best performance in AE, I would go through the rest of the After Effects & Premiere Pro Performance Workshop.  You'll learn a lot.

  • Mac Pro 8 core - great, but not great... Any ideas please?

    Hi Guys,
    Firstly, let me say I'm Apple Certified in FCP so I'm not a newbie, however I am having a hard time coming to terms with my current situation.
    My G5 Quad appeared to be struggling on some basic (3 layers of text) real time stuff in PAL DV, and I was lucky enough to be able to upgrade to a Mac Pro 8 core 3.0GHz last week. "That will sort my stuttering problems" I thought...
    No it doesn't. Any new basic text (Boris) or any dissolve makes the playback jump, possibly worse than the G5 did. Aaaaargh! Anyone got any ideas why this shouldn't play back a dream?
    Also, does anyone know why the Blackmagic never appears as an option in the Effect Handling section of System Settings?
    Hope you can all help soon.
    p.s. I have not got any media on my startup disk, and the second disk is almost empty...

    Assuming your Scratch Disk is on the 2nd drive inside the Mac Pro, then let's see if that drive might be under-performing. Download Kona system Test v3 from http://www.aja.com/html/supportkona3swd.html and install it.
    Run the test on both drives, using the largest file size. Please report back on the read & write numbers you get on each drive.
    BTW, journaling should make no discernible difference on a SATA 3Gbps hard drive, and you most definitely SHOULD enable journaling on your boot volume. It doesn't matter either way for the media drive, but if you do not enable journaling for the boot volume, it will bite you in the butt someday. Trust me on that.
    Besides, journaling takes zero action on a disk read, which is what you are having problems with. It takes a tiny bit of time for the write heads to write the data to the journal, but not enough to make any real difference for your extremely speedy Mac Pro. The location of the journal file is on the outermost tracks on the platters, the fastest ones.

  • Fileshare between my Mac Pro Quad Core Intel Xeon (64-bit) & Power Mac 9600

    I want to make my Power Macintosh 9600/233 (Mac OS 9) a shared computer with my Mac Pro Quad Core Intel Xeon (64-bit)(Mac OS 10.6.6). I am using a Netopia Model 3346N-VGx DSL Ethernet Managed Switch to network with my Samsung printer and the Mac Book Pro.
    I also have a Power PC G4 (Mac OS 10.5.8) connected (via a Ziplinq 48" Retractable Crossover Network Cable) to a Farallon EtherWave 10 Base-T AAUI Transceiver, which in turn is connected to the Netopia, from which I can share files. All of this is ethernet connectivity.
    I thought I could connect my 9600 using the same method as for the G4 or by connecting the ethernet cable from the 9600 directly into the Mac Pro Quad Core. However, neither of these methods work.
    An additional stumbling block is that I have not used this 9600 for several years and am not sure of its account name. I'm fairly certain of its password. But because I don't have a second monitor for this machine, I can't muddle my way in.
    My questions:
    1. What might be a network solution to this dilemma?
    2. Or, do I need to get another monitor for this computer and leave it un-networked and just transfer files manually?
    3. Or, would whatever hard drives are in the 9600 be transferable into the networked G4 or the main Mac Pro? (not sure what they are.)
    Any suggestions greatly appreciated.

    Oh man, what a dilemma...
    1. What might be a network solution to this dilemma?
    Without a monitor on the 9600, almost none. At the very least you'll need to configure the server with appropriate network settings for your environment, and that can't be done headless.
    You might only need a display for long enough to setup the network, but you'll need one all the same.
    Once the network is configured your options are either AFP or FTP, but I'm not even sure the old version of AFP is supported anymore, which means you may need to fire up an FTP client on the 9600 and push the files to your MacPro.
    2. Or, do I need to get another monitor for this computer and leave it un-networked and just transfer files manually?
    As mentioned above, you're going to need a monitor at the very least to configure the network settings. I'd be inclined to say at that point you might as well copy the files off any way you can and put the 9600 to rest. If you're really, really fortunate and the 9600 has a CD burner I'd probably use that and count myself lucky
    3. Or, would whatever hard drives are in the 9600 be transferable into the networked G4 or the main Mac Pro? (not sure what they are.)
    The 9600 shipped with SCSI drives, which no current Mac support (at least without a SCSI card), so there's no way to remove the drive from the 9600 and attach it directly to the MacPro.

  • Mac Pro 8-Core AC Power Requirements

    I am in the US (120 VAC) and am wondering if anyone has more details concerning the amperage usage on these units. Apple tech specs show only a MAXIMUM of 12 amps when running in the Low range (120 VAC). I am assuming that the maximum of 12A is during startup draw and possibly under heavy load conditions. But, is there a "normal" draw?
    The reason I am asking is that in the next 60 days, I will be replacing 18 PPC G5 units with the MP 8-Core units, and there will be a period of time that I will be required to run both units (due to software and workflow issues).
    In most newer wiring scenarios, the breakers are rated for either 20 or 25 amps, and will trip at an 80% load.
    I've got LCD's (minimal amp requirements), so I'm trying to determine how many units per circuit I can have running without tripping breakers.
    Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Chris

    I have an 8-core (Nehalem) Mac Pro with 14 GB of RAM and two internal drives. The measurements cited here are observed on the information display of an APC Back-UPS XS 1500 that has an additional 20" Apple Cinema Display plugged into the (measured) backed-up outlets of the UPS.
    This Mac has a second display but it is not connected to the backed-up outlet of the UPS and therefore not measured, but there could be extra power draw by the GPU because of it.
    The measurements are taken with the line voltage at about 119 volts RMS.
    When booting, there is a large instantaneous in-rush that showed over 400 watts, but it is just for the blink of an eye, so I wouldn't trust what the XS-1500 tells me. The in-rush current is non-trivial, though. I had to change to the XS-1500 UPS because an RS-900 UPS that I had earlier used with a dual core G5 PowerMac, which this MacPro replaced, did not have enough capacity to allow this Mac Pro to boot.
    During booting, the peak power draw is about 205 watts. The XS-1500 may not see spikes in the power draw, so the actual peaks may be a bit higher than 205 watts.
    After booting and when idle (no active apps), the power draw is about 170 watts.
    When put to sleep, the Mac Pro and the display together runs about 14 watts.
    I have written a (antenna design) program that uses Grand Central Dispatch and it can push Activity Monitor past 800% (I have seen it go up to 1200% on this mere 8 core machine, so I am not sure how much you can trust Activity Monitor either). In that condition, the power draw is 270 watts.
    All in all, the Mac Pro is quite power efficient, but you may want to stagger the booting of your 18 machines just in case the in-rush is too great.
    That being said, there is an unresolved bug as of 10.6.2 (you can find it in a different Mac Pro thread here) that causes power consumption to bump up to 240 watts (on my machine) whenever Core Audio is actively running. This jump in power occurs even when you play music in iTunes and occurs even when I use a couple of external USB or FireWire Sound Cards that I have (including the Griffin RadioShark and an external USB speaker). A couple of apps that I have written uses Core Audio -- and I can tell that the jump in power happens the instant you start causing Core Audio to issue callbacks.
    Kok Chen

  • My Mac Pro will not power on. I've replaced the power supply, still will not power on. Is there anyone with a solution?

    My Mac Pro will not power on. I've replaced the power supply, still will not power on.
    Is there anyone with a solution?

    Try a pram reset:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1379

  • Error message on my Mac Pro Quad Core Dual

    Hello..I'm hoping someone out there can help or advise me.
    I turned on my mac this morning to find it's normal loading screen of grey with the darker grey logo in centre..all normal at this stage. This was followed by a wipe from top to bottom making the background grey a little darker and in the centre the apple logo was replaced by what appeared to be a semi transparent power button symbol with the words. "You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the restart button"
    I have tried this several times to no avail I have also zapped the P RAM again nothing. Can anyone out there help. I have a Mac Pro Quad Core Dual which is only a few months old and is up to date with its system software.
    I could be so grateful of any assistance.
    Warm regards
    Sophia

    Make an appointment. But in the meantime...
    So from cold boot, you can't do the Command Option P R through 2-3 full reboot cycles (don't let up)?
    Unplug everything and let it sit overnight without power cord or anything. That is the only way to rest the SMC system management controller on the 2008 model, the older model still had a reset button.
    Also learned that the 2008 Macs can all boot AHT if the original OEM installer was used to install the system and the drive has not be completely reformatted and retail OS X used, just holding down "D" on startup. But you have to
    Also, pull all your hard drives. Rule out that, which I have seen a hard drive cause panic on startup, which required disabling journaling and other repairs from Disk Utility and deleting caches, then repair, and finally do Safe Boot (shift key down on startup).
    The only way to test RAM is with TechTool Deluxe or Pro; with Memtest or Rember; and to test some devices is to try using a differnent one, keyboard and mouse included if you have any.
    Last hope: open case, look inside, take the two RAM Riser cards and pull out, check the DIMMs are fully seated.
    If you have 3rd party memory, remove that (would need to before taking in probably).
    Might want to put RAM back to way it shipped with 2 x 1GB and one DIMM on each Riser in slot one. Maybe that will wake this sleeping giant. Changing RAM config use to be one way to clear nvram in the distant past in the time of Arthur.
    PS: it is "odd" to find a BTO 3.2GHz system, and only 2GB. For memory performance, Barefeats found a marked improvement with 8 DIMMs, and of course Mac Pro really needs memory to feed 8 cores and pro apps (2GB would be okay for web and email type use only).

  • FCS2 - Mac Pro 4-Core or 8-Core

    Been reading both the FCP forum and the MacPro forum and still not unsure which way to go.
    I'm an avid Avid user (sorry about that) for many years and now making the switch to FCS2. My confusion lies in which configuration to get to best maximize FCS2-- Mac Pro 4-core with maximum RAM or Mac Pro 8-core with 6 or 8 GB RAM? The machine will be used 90% for FCS 2 so that's the main decision-making factor here.
    Been reading articles about bottlenecks that make having 8-cores benign, but I find them hard to believe. Either way, the cost is about the same (the $$ saved buying the 4-core would be spent on more RAM).
    Thanks for your time and advice.

    If you become a "power user" i.e. running more than one app at a time all the time.... The 8 processor machine will be faster than the quad... if not, they'll be similar in speed.
    See: http://www.barefeats.com Rob there comes up with much the same conclusion. There are certain apps though that really shine on the octo... AE for example... and Certainly Compressor 3... big time...
    I'd go with the faster machine figuring Leopard will make a big difference in the way it handles mulitple processor machines.
    Jerry

  • FCS 2 -- Mac Pro 4-core or 8-core?

    Been reading both the FCP forum and the MacPro forum and still not unsure which way to go.
    I'm an avid Avid user (sorry about that) for many years and now making the switch to FCS2. My confusion lies in which configuration to get to best maximize FCS2-- Mac Pro 4-core with maximum RAM or Mac Pro 8-core with 6 or 8 GB RAM? The machine will be used 90% for FCS 2 so that's the main decision-making factor here.
    Been reading articles about bottlenecks that make having 8-cores benign, but I find them hard to believe. Either way, the cost is about the same (the $$ saved buying the 4-core would be spent on more RAM).
    Thanks for your time and advice.

    With FCS the trick to maximising your performance is balance. Getting the balance right between processor performance, GPU performance, RAM and drive performance can often be a tricky thing. Unless you consider your system as a whole, any improvement in one area will often have little value.
    At the price of the 8-core upgrade (more than 50% of a whole new one!) I would think you'd get far better value by going with a 3GHz 4-core system and maxing out everything else.

  • Adding new hard drive to Mac Pro (quad core)

    I've just ordered a new Mac Pro quad core (2.66 GHz) with one GB HD. Since Apple is charging £240 for a second drive I decided to get it from somewhere else. I found a 1GB Western Digital Caviar Green but I also noticed 1GB WD Caviar Black. I wonder if anybody has any experience of those drives and would they work with the latest Mac Pro ?
    Does anybody knows what make of drive is Apple using in their latest Mac Pros ?
    Tom

    *WD Caviar Black 640GB*
    HD Tune: WDC WD6401AALS-00L3B2 Benchmark
    Transfer Rate Minimum : 59.1 MB/sec
    Transfer Rate Maximum : 118.1 MB/sec
    Transfer Rate Average : 96.4 MB/sec
    Access Time : 11.8 ms
    Burst Rate : 125.3 MB/sec
    *Black Caviar 1TB:*
    HD Tune: WDC WD1001FALS-00J7B Benchmark
    Transfer Rate Minimum : 53.9 MB/sec
    Transfer Rate Maximum : 108.7 MB/sec
    Transfer Rate Average : 86.1 MB/sec
    Access Time : 12.9 ms
    Burst Rate : 111.5 MB/sec
    +(note the slower average to the smaller 640GB model)+
    *Green Power 1TB*
    HD Tune: WDC WD10EADS-00L5B1 Benchmark
    12-23-2008
    Transfer Rate Minimum : 41.6 MB/sec
    Transfer Rate Maximum : 95.6 MB/sec
    Transfer Rate Average : 74.3 MB/sec
    Access Time : 14.0 ms
    Burst Rate : 117.2 MB/sec
    *WD Caviar Blue 640GB*
    HD Tune: WDC WD6400AAKS-00A7B Benchmark
    Transfer Rate Minimum : 55.6 MB/sec
    Transfer Rate Maximum : 113.3 MB/sec
    Transfer Rate Average : 90.2 MB/sec
    Access Time : 11.8 ms
    Burst Rate : 112.9 MB/sec
    the 32MB cache did not make a real or noticeable difference in benchmarks
    http://www.barefeats.com/hard112.html

  • Opinions, Mac pro 12 core or 6 core for video editing?

    Hello everyone,
    I know that this a most likely a rhetorical question but i currently have a mac pro 12 core 2.4ghz 12 gigs of ram (plan on upgrading to 32 gigs) and a 6 core 3.33ghz 12 gigs of ram. I do a lot of video editing (starting to use Final cut pro X) and i do a lot of visual effects work in Adobe after effects and 3D animaton work in cinema 4d. I am only keeping one of the computers.. what are your guys thoughts? Should i keep the 12 core even tough it has a lower clock speed, or should i keep the 6 core since it has a higher clock speed? I dont mean to ask such a dumb question but i want to hear what your guys thoughts are.
    Thanks in advance!

    After Effects: http://www.barefeats.com/aecs6.html
    If you rely on cpu alone, it may look like it is working, or lagging, or wating, but with the combined power of GPGPU can make all the difference.
    Communicating over Quick-Path is okay but Intel knows that they need to up the GT and L3 cache to improve it more. ie, there are times when two 6-core Mac Pros are faster than one 12-core, given the same GHz.
    the real reason people bought dual with lower clock was hoping it would do more work, but when you have 3.33GHz a lot of work that cann't be dispatched and is not multi-thread or multicore all benefit.
    W3680s are relatively cheap @ $600, you will not find X5600 sets unless you can make your system pay for whatever you throw at it and do so in a year to write it off and pay for doing more projects and more income.
    This guy goes kind of crazy with custom setup 12-core 3.33s, 960GB SSD PCIe and 96GB RAM.
    More RAM helps some areas but not rendering. So find the bottlenecks or throw everything at the problem and hope.
    $1660 a piece X5680 - $1470 on Amazon
    http://ark.intel.com/products/47916/Intel-Xeon-Processor-X5680-(12M-Cache-3_33-G Hz-6_40-GTs-Intel-QPI)
    http://www.amazon.com/Intel-X5680-Processor-Socket-LGA1366/dp/B003ELYSJQ/
    Only if you shop ebay for used parts, and by then whatever Intel and Apple agree on next go round new is a better system solution most of the time than to throw $3000 into an older system. $3k would be another 6-core 3.33 if that helps.

  • Mac pro 12 core or a top spec iMac?

    Hi all,
    Im after a little advice...
    Ok so ive been using a mac since the start of this year, i started out with a top spec mac mini, which i love but i now need more power.
    So after looking at apple computers constantly im stuck for whats gonna be best for my needs and the decision comes down to 2 computers, the iMac or Mac Pro.
    What i want is a computer i can game with for games such as skyrim, borderlands, battlefield 3, starcraft 2 etc and run them at the highest graphic settings with no problems, on top of this i will be doing graphic design, web design and some video editing using adobe software and ofcourse apple software, besides that i will be using it to watch movies, play music, browse and download/upload etc as an everyday person would.
    IMac
    So i was first looking at the top spec iMac you can buy, has the quad i7 3.4 processor with 2gig graphics and plenty of ram, and enough hd room for me too, not to mention it looks gorgeous with the apple display, the only dissapointment is that they havnt updated it as i hoped they woukld along side the MacBook Pro, which forces me to wait for the next update if i do decide to purchase one.
    Is the current spec good enough to play my games and create my graphics etc? If it is then i should have no problems with the next updated iMacs.
    Mac Pro
    After reading a few reviews about the iMac and Mac Pro it seems that those xeon processors are beastly compared to the iMac, so ive focused my viewing onto the Mac Pro 12 core, and with the same requirements that i need above, is the 12 core beast a little OP for me? and not to mention i sacrifice having thunderbolt and a sweet display, and if an update is heading to the iMac i could miss out on a retina display along with USB 3 and more.
    But on the other hand i can upgrade a Mac Pro alot easier if i need to, and it will be massive power compared to the iMac, plus it would be more futureproof wouldnt it? Is trhe current Mac Pro 12 core spec good enough for my requirements? (im asking that question based more on gaming)
    So right now im stuck, what would you suggest? Do i get a powerful monster of a computer or a pretty machine with all the latest tricks( after an update ofcourse )?
    Help me out folks, im soo itching to get one or the other.
    I appreciate all your help, Thanks!
    Carl

    Wayne said it right, "future upgradeability" is key. I saw myself witht he same dilema and at the end bought a 12 core. The Quad core might run some tasks faster than the 12 core for the fact that is 3.33GHz and the 12 is 2.4GHz, but it you can keep upgading the RAM up to 64Gig, the Quad up to 32, plus the cache is double, I'm quite happy with my purchase. If you don't want to spend that much, to some the best choice is order the quad with a 6 core chip, a hair over 3K.
    Tower Power!

Maybe you are looking for