Mac Pro arriving soon - where to put it?

Hi all,
pardon the naive question, but the biggest Mac I've ever owned was a flat-panel iMac G4...
Is the Mac Pro a floor-stander? A desktop? Can you put it sideways?
The location of connectors, power cable etc doesn't seem to suggest a favoured location and position. I'd be interested in hearing where and how others keep their Mac Pros.
Cheers
Steffen.

Drives don't care which what they're oriented as long as it's one way or another. It's not good to change orientation once you've had it one way or another after a period of time.
The optical drive may be ok if the tray has this little "bracket" thing, sorry for my crap description, that allows it to hold discs on when the drive is not on its usual orientation. Some do and some don't.
As for the floor or desk, as you note, given it's size it's not an easy thing to have on your desk. The front panel connectors aren't any more awkward that say a Dell desktop with front connectors so I don't think they're a big worry.
If it helps any mine will be on the floor next to a rather large UPS.

Similar Messages

  • Mac Pro arriving today!

    There is SO much info here that it's hard to find all help that I may need. Am I even posting in the right forum?!
    So, any help with what I may run into would be MOST appreciated!
    I just read that Tiger has a small app in Utilities called Migration that may help move files and apps over to the new machine...does it take ALL the files (hidden ones, too)? Like including the payed versions of Roxio's Toast Titainium? (I can't find where my product key is!)
    I am MOST concerned that my version of Photoshop (7) won't work on the Mac Pro_but have been told that it will run fine, (via Rosetta?) is this true?
    So, as you can see, I will be grateful for ALL comments!
    Thank you...
    Mark
    iMac G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9) Soon: Mac Pro Quad 2.66GHz 250 HD 2GB RAM 20" Apple Cinema Display
    iMac G4   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  

    All the advice I got prior to the arrival of my Mac Pro was to wipe the hard drive clean and start fresh with a new install. I was so antsy tho' I didn't want to wait and since I was transferring from one Intel system to another I figured if it didn't work, I'd wipe it clean and reinstall and then install the programs anew.
    But it worked just fine. About a week later I was putting the Mac Pro box away, taking the items out of it for storage, when I realized Apple had not included any OSX disks at all. The machine was already preconfigured but still, I would need those disks should anything ever go wrong (of if I just wanted to boot from Disk 1 and use the utilities).
    So I called and asked that the disks be mailed. The disks they sent were identified as "replacement" disks, not original OSX disks. It doesn't matter, of course, because they do the same thing but I wondered how a newbie might feel or do in such a situation.
    So make sure your OSX disks are in the box, just in case. BTW, I've never had another reason to wipe out a hard disk and start anew. OSX just runs well for me. Every now and then I'll install a program that won't feel or sit right and when I verify the hard disk it will tell me to boot from Disk 1 and use the disk utility to correct the error.
    As for the Office Demo ... when I bought the Mac Pro they offered me the option of throwing in a free (Canon, I think) color printer but I already had a fine HP Color Laserjet so I asked for (and got) Office for the Mac. So I never did see the Office demo product, the full version must have overwritten it.
    But if you want to remove it without any residual files I suppose you could use something like AppZapper (which has a trial version that will allow you to zap three or five programs).
    Tim...

  • Mac Pro Update Soon?

    I currently own a 17" MacBook Pro (2009), a Mac Pro G5, a 27" iMac (this year), an iPhone 4, and two iPods.
    I edit video and produce music with Final Cut Pro 7 and Logic 9 (among other things). I have invested heavily in Apple products, and I'm preparing to invest even more this coming year in order to prepare for some upcoming film projects I will be editing and scoring.
    I am patiently waiting to learn whether or not the Mac Pro will be updated soon, or will it be killed altogether.
    I am not at all impressed with Apple's recent actions, to wit: Reducing Final Cut Pro to a higher version of iMovie; killing the 17" MacBook Pro; and releasing a watered down and dysfunctinoal version of Maps for the iPhone and iPad, to name a few.
    I have planned on obtaining a new iPhone 5 and the iPad (64GB) this year, as well as a 12-core Mac Pro (or equivalent depending on whatever new models may be released).
    However, if Apple kills off the Mac Pro, or renders it a useless pile of techno-junk in order to serve the large mass-consumer market, I WILL walk away from Apple in its entirety. This includes puchasing a different phone, tablet, and workstation this year. For now, I will keep my old iPhone 4 on month-to-month with Verizon until these decisions shake out.
    Apple needs to realize that its decisions often impact other portions of their product line when they alienate and frustrate their professional users - who are not dependent upon Apple's workflows or UIs to get their work done. I am equally efficient and confident on either platform, but I use Apple out of preference.
    As much as I hate MicroTrash Winblows, I will not allow my production efforts (and investments) to be left to the whims of Apple's executive managment and most-likely ill-informed and dysfunctional stockholders.
    At anywhere between $5,000 and $14,000 for a Mac Pro, this is not a small investment, and before I make said investment, I need to know that the vendor is going to continue to support the product both now and in the years to come.
    Any insight anyone could provide regarding Apple's proposed strategies surrounding the Mac Pro would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you!
    Bob Lee

    There were 100 threads and even more posts for the last year. Apple doesn't hear or read forum content.
    2013 could be a sleeper year too if Intel decides to skip Xeon Ivy Bridge and so close to the next tick-toc - Intel developer conference pretty much sets the stage for the next year which IDC is in October - where we heard about Penryn that went into 2008s, Nehalem's went into 2009.
    Buy refurbished 2010 $1819 and throw in $1000 W3690 and 3x16GB - core speed and single socket and max out RAM and load up on PCIE SSD as well.
    http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/mac/mac_pro
    throw in GTX 670 or 570...
    You can find good detailed threads on MacRumors for the above ideas.
    http://www.macperformanceguide.com/
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1360927

  • I need an anti-glare film for my brand new Mac Pro 17". Where do I go?

    Does anybody know where to find an anti-glare film for a new mac pro 17"?? 

    Does anybody know where to find an anti-glare film for a new mac pro 17"?? 

  • Sandy bridge Mac Pros, anytime soon?

    Hey Guys,
    Just wondering if the Sandy Bridge Mac Pros will be out anytime soon this year?
    Its been more than a year since the Mac Pro line has been updated.
    Thanks

    http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#Mac_Pro
    Stefan

  • New mac pro, CS5 crashes, where to start?

    I have a new mac pro which crashes daily while using After Effects (and photoshop). I've seen some indication that this could be a driver issue with the 2 nvidia cards that came preinstalled, or an Adobe issue. Running 10.6.4 Snow Leopard. I can recreate this sometimes by scrubbing the after effects timeline with a spotlight casting a shadow on another layer. The system locks up, left monitor flashes black and I have to hard rest. This is super frustrating, apple has twice told me it's Adobe, but I don't know. All I do know as a business owner is that I'm $13,000 invested in hardware / software that don't seem to work together and I don't have many other options as this is what i do for living. Any thoughts at all? Anyone have any ideas?
    2x2.93 quad core xeon
    16gb 1066 ddr3
    level 5 raid with 4 1TB drives
    OSX 10.6.4
    MacPro4,1
    2 nvidia 120 cards
    2 24" cinema displays (one per card)
    thanks in advance
    scott

    For sure it is really frustrating, especially when you convinced the company you work with to switch from FCP to CS5...
    I have the same problem with a Mac Pro bought in April and a GTX 280... We were pretty happy with Premiere Pro, when editing a feature shot on RED 4K HD. It is the more stable release of that soft I ever seen, and I'm using it since Premiere 5.1 and the mini-DV.
    But I'm disappointed by After Effect, which use to be alway stable in the previous version I used. We're working on a 3300$ computer, using a 450$ graphic card, and the two Samsung monitors keep flashing before AFX craches... That happen every 15 minutes.
    The GeForce driven is updated. We have also a Geforce GT 120 in the Mac Pro, to plug a Wacom Cintiq 12WX on it... The screen of the wacom doesn't flash when it happens to the Samsungs, that's why I'm thinking of an issue involving the GTX 280. Anyway, nVidia does not provide any driver for Mac for the GT 120...
    So it's probably more a graphic card issue, than a software one... But if someone has any other idea to get rid of this problem (unactivate open GL does not change the problem)... ?
    Thanks in advance for who may help...

  • Will my Mac Pro Work anywhere where there's Electricity?

    Well, I'm moving to Europe and wondering if I should take my Mac Pro along for the ride. I'll definitely use it over there. The questions are . . .
    1. Does the Mac Pro have the dual voltage feature that most laptops have? (Most laptops can handle either US 110v AC, or European 220v DC.)
    2. Is it worth the cost of buying a power converter/transformer?
    3. Does anyone have any experience with this?
    Just to be more specific, I'm moving to Prague.

    I moved from the US to Europe and have had no problems with any of my macs. The only difference you see is in keyboard layouts. If you buy one in Europe they have different localizations (for example, in France the top line of letters is azerty, not qwerty). So if you need a new keyboard, buy one before you leave.
    The other thing is price, buy what you need in the US before you leave, it will be cheaper! If you have powered USB hubs, bring them and then just buy the appropriate DC power supply over here.

  • New Mac Pro shuts down when I put it to sleep?

    I go to click my mouse of keyboard and nothing happens. I click the power button the back lights up and turns on as if it were off, what gives? This is brand new 64gb ram, 12 core, didn't even do a migration so it's all new stuff on here.

    Hello Chief Sneed,
    It sounds like your computer is going to sleep but when you later go to wake it up it will not turn on unless you press the power button and it looks to have shutdown at some point. I recommend checking to see if the computer is scheduled to shutdown at a certain time with the following article:
    OS X Mavericks: Schedule your Mac to shut down or go to sleep automatically
    http://support.apple.com/kb/PH13914
    Schedule your Mac to turn on, turn off, go to sleep, or wake from sleep at specified times. You might do this if you want to be sure your Mac turns off when you aren’t working and turns on before you come to work.
    Choose Apple menu > System Preferences, then click Energy Saver.
    Click Schedule, then select the options you want to use.
    To schedule a startup or wake time for your Mac, select the “Start up or wake” checkbox. Choose a day or group of days from the pop-up menu, then enter a time.
    To schedule a shutdown, sleep, or restart time for your Mac, select the bottom checkbox and choose the appropriate option from the pop-up menu. Choose a day or group of days from the pop-up menu, then enter a time.
    Thank you for using Apple Support Communities.
    Take care,
    Sterling

  • Windows 7 Boot fails on Mac Pro 1,1 (long-standing issue)

    i am having a long-standing problem on my first generation (1,1) mac pro where i have an installation of Windows 7 "under" boot camp. this installation involved some kind of minor mac hack that involved writing something to ISO and/or a CD Rom and then getting the installation onto my hard drive.
    right now i am not sure if i should get rid of my tech guy, buy the new mac pro as soon as it comes out, boot into safe mode, re-install windows 7 or all of the above. help please?
    lately if i try and Option Boot into this volume i get a Windows closed down incorrectly error and then i hit start windows normally it will crash out and restart the computer in mac OS (i.e. in another option boot volume).
    at one point the windows 7 boot was not working at all and we discovered that i had to TURN OFF my G-Tech 3 TB backup drive in order to get the Mac to boot into Windows.
    i am wondering if i should focus my energies by trying to boot into Safe Mode (and if so what to do if/when i get there) but also whether this appears to be an issue with the Mac Pro, the G-Tech external, Windows or some combination of all plus some user error thrown in for good measure.
    i absolutely need to have a volume of windows 7 running and this is a long-standing issue at this point.
    i am also running a Carbon Copy Cloner of this volume (the one that has all my OS's) on a daily basis to another internal hard drive (which i assume does not matter but i figure to mention it).
    any ideas on what to do??
    i am planning at some point to buy the next release of the Mac Pro so i can upgrade the desktop to Mountain Lion to match the laptop but it seems like i should be able to get this working on my end now...
    TIA
    P.S. I /am/ also noticing that my User Photo periodically drops off and i just see two blank icons (one for me and one for Guest) when i have to login. i set it to a photo and then a week or two or a boot or two later it will disappear.

    hi all,
    a report back after hacking my way through siberia over here:
    turns out there are bad sectors on my drive that some third party program discovered.
    the disk is on it's way back to WD with a replacement in the works.
    fortunately my internal cloned backup got me back up to speed with mac os but unfortunately i was not yet setup to clone my windows boot camp backup so i will be installing windows 7 boot camp one more time on this drive...

  • How do you new Mac Pro owners like your machine with Logic?

    Don't mean to be a PITA but I need to get this right before I drop three to five grand on a new set of music tools. I'm trying to decide between Mac Pro and iMac for use with Logic. Seems there are a lot of posts regarding glitches with the new Mac Pro and Logic, whereas the posts from people with older G4s and G5s seem to indicate they are running rock solid. So you new Mac Pro folks or anyone else, please weigh in. Is the new Mac Pro "glitch heavy" or is it just a matter of tweaking the system to where it runs smooth? In general, how do you new Mac Pro folks like the way it works with Logic?

    I'm mostly pleased with my MacPro 2.66. Almost no crashes with Logic, although I experience a few more bugs here and there than with my G4. Occasional CoreAudio errors, I have to restart CoreAudio if my external word clock is set to the wrong sample rate when I open a session, there seems to be a bug between high fader levels (above +4dB) and panning... little things like that.
    Then again, compared to my G4, the FireWire bus is screaming fast--with most sessions, I can run a buffer of 128 samples at 96k with my MOTU 828mkII, while my G4 would sometimes glitch at 96k with 512 samples. At 96k, 256 samples, my MacPro/828mkII rig is rock-solid... I informally tested it by recording 12 test tracks simultaneously for 20 minutes, with the CPU nearly maxed out (which was difficult to do--took a bunch of Space Designers and Ultrabeats)--absolutely zero clicks or pops.
    And of course, WAY more processing power than my G4.
    I'm assuming that MacPro compatibility is a fairly high priority for Apple these days, so hopefully the bugs will get worked out soon. And as things are, Logic is definitely usable on a MacPro--the bugs I encounter rarely slow down my work.
    So, far from perfect, but as far as new technology goes, I'd say Logic on the MacPro is above average.
    Good luck!
    James
    [email protected]

  • Mac Pro 1.1 2006-2007

    Originally this posted as 1996-1997 as I was attempting to post this at 2:30am.
    I recently had an experience with my Mac Pro 1.1 where it started lagging badly and when I attempted to reboot it locked up. At one point the Time Machine external drive unmounted and my USB ports weren't functioning. Later I attempted to retrieve the back up drive and do a complete restore, but found Disk Utility would never finish repairing the disk and permissions. In fact, this caused the Mac Pro to lock up and I would lose my USB ports again.
    I ran the Apple Hardware Test twice and no results that would tell me what happened.
    It was until I purchased a new drive to put in the external back up drive that my Mac Pro returned to normal. In fact I have seen better performance.
    My question is, is I would like to hear opinions on this. Was this a gradual failure of a back up drive that had slowly been causing my Mac Pro to run sluggish until it finally crashed? Can a failing back up drive using Time Machine cause this? If not then what caused the Mac Pro to lock up? What can cause USB ports to stop functioning altogether and then return not afte a reboot but eventually?
    I'm concerned that I could be losing my Mac Pro in the near future. I would love the new Mac Pro coming out later this year, but money is an issue right now. I would not be happy with a Mac Mini and iMacs are still financially out of my reach as well.
    Thanks you.

    My advice:
    Replace the system drive with a Samsung 840 120 or 250GB SSD
    Upgrade boot drive on a regular basis - for some that might be every two years
    You are STARVING your system with so little memory. Anemia most likely.
    If you are running Lion then upgrade to 10.7.5
    If you did not do a "clean" install of Lion ./ or at least a clean install of Snow Leopard 10.6.8 and then update to Lion, that too can be an issue.
    Remove the very old 512MB DIMMs taking up space and replace with 4 x2GB ($60)
    How To Install and Remove Memory Mac Pro
    https://support.apple.com/kb/HT4433
    http://www.datamemorysystems.com/apple-mac-pro-8-core-2-x-quad-core-intel-xeon-3 -0ghz-bto-2007-memory-upgrades/
    2x2GB FBDIMM DDR2 667MHz @ $32
    http://www.amazon.com/BUFFERED-PC2-5300-FB-DIMM-APPLE-Memory/dp/B002ORUUAC/
    http://www.crucial.com/store/partspecs.aspx?IMODULE=CT2KIT102472AF667
    Mac Pro 8GB Kit
    Komputerbay 8GB (2x 4GB) DDR2 667MHz ECC FB-DIMM 240 PIN
    http://www.amazon.com/Komputerbay-PC2-5300F-Buffered-FB-DIMM-Heatspreaders/dp/B0 05HIWD5U/
    SSD: Samsung 840 128GB
    http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-Series-120GB-internal-MZ-7TD120BW/dp/B009NHAF06/
    An SSD is a great way for $100 to make your mac faster and better than ever. Not justs quick boot and program launching but that too.
    And a 1-2TB WD Black for data.
    And of course you should be cloning your system, cloning your data drive(s), even swap and use a 2nd TimeMachine drive "only on weekend" to have a redundant backup set there too.
    And instead of using USB, use FW400/800
    You also have two extra SATA ports on the logicboard. For $25 run through a PCI card out the back for backups (not hot swap though). Ideal is to have internal 1-3TB drive for backup.
    Can also add PCIe SATA card to add external backups; add USB3 (iffy).
    If you have been living on 3GB RAM you have not been seeing good performance from your Mac Pro 1,1 (same model as mine, 7 yrs old this week)

  • Mac Pro with X1900XT and video corruption

    Hi gentle people
    My Mac Pro arrived a few days ago. It's a CTO with a X1900XT and Aperture and some other options (wireless, RAM, HDD).
    I'm really excited about the package and the out-of-the-box experience but yesterday I noticed video corruption in Aperture. It looks like a repeating pattern of green and purple dots.
    Today, I investigated further and I noticed these things:
    -The dots are in the video memory (can be caught in a screenshot), so it's not a problem with the display.
    -The dots can stick around everywhere on my screen, not only in Aperture.
    -Google Earth and Quicktime both also display video corruption in the same way.
    -The TechTool program from the Applecare disk doesn't find a problem. I guess this is because the memory problem is not situated in the frame buffer but somewhere else in the 512MB. For example, on a location where textures (for Google earth and Aperture) are stored.
    -Temperature has no influence; the corruption is there even after a cold night and a cold boot (from power off).
    -Apart from this, my system seems stable. No crashes yet and I have about 12 hours on the counter.
    -Changing resolutions or SMC reset didn't do anything to improve the situation.
    My conclusion: my X1900XT has a bad memory chip or is otherwise defective.
    Lucky me; I also bought Applecare. I'll be calling them tomorrow to see what they'll do about this.
    What is others people experience with this kind of problems?
    Will they send me a good X1900XT by mail? Or will I have to bring in my computer? Arghhlll... Such a beauty with a little rough spot
    Kind regards
    Koen
    Mac Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   Mac Pro - X1900XT - 4GB - 500GB - AE+BT - 30"CD

    Hi there kolson
    That picture you're showing seems awfully familiar. It's the same kind of corruption as I'm seeing. Only I haven't had a single lockup yet.
    I've been on the phone with Applecare this evening. It was a friendly guy who helped me through the basic stuff such as:
    -Use the other DVI output on the video card
    -Use another monitor
    -Log in as a different user
    -Reset PRAM
    -Reset SMC
    -Apple hardware test (no problems found)
    -Techtool deluxe from the Applecare cd (no problems found)
    -He also asked me to boot in safe mode. I was unable to reproduce the problem this time but the machine, particularly graphics, were very slow. Aperture wouldn't even function correctly. I believe that in safe mode, no hardware acceleration is used so the video card is not stressed at all and the CPUs get to do all the drawing which is why the thing was so slow.
    The call ended after this but I have a case number and will be calling tomorrow to see what to do next.
    I stay with my previous conclusion: there's something wrong with the video card. It's clear that the display is of no importance because I can capture the dots in a screenshot.
    Good luck! I'll try to keep this thread updated.
    Koen
    iBook   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   I have a Mac pro on order!

  • Apple, Mac Pro, Amd vs Nvidia with cuda? Why, and what to buy for Premiere Pro?

    Mac Pro has dual Amd video cards installed, and does not offer Nvidia cards with Cuda in this line up, as far as I can tell. The iMacs offer nvidia cards which seem a better choice for Premiere Pro which uses the cuda rendering capabilities. Which would be best for Premiere Pro? The quad Mac Pro, or the top of the line iMac with double the ram, say 32gigs vs 16 in the Mac Pro?  Why did Apple put AMD cards in the Mac Pro line?

    jtopenshaw wrote:
    Why did Apple put AMD cards in the Mac Pro line?
    Apple believes that OpenCL, not CUDA, is the future of GPGPU computing.  CUDA is closed and proprietary to nVidia only.  OpenCL is, as the name says: open.
    As of the creation and planning of the Mac Pro, nVidia's GPUs were (and most of them still are) very poor performers when it comes to OpenCL.  I expect that, over time, nVidia will catch up to AMD regarding OpenCL.  But they're not quite there yet, across the board.
    Why are the GPUs in the iMac (and Macbook Pro) nVidia?  They make better and more efficient mobile GPUs at this point in time.  The GPU in the iMac is similar to the GPU in the Macbook Pro in that they're both mobile, not desktop GPUs.  AMD has a fairly poor representation in that market (so far), so Apple stuck with nVidia.
    It's likely that Apple doesn't see the iMac and Macbook Pro lineup as devices to be used for massive GPGPU processing.  The Mac Pro, on the other hand is where they see that being used heavily.  Perhaps when and if AMD decides to produce an efficient and powerful mobile GPU, Apple will cut (back) over to them.  But one can only guess, there.
    Ugio wrote:
    What I can tell you it's that the mixture between Mac Pro (2013) and the last Adobe Suite does not worth the money.
    That's fair and is your opinion.  I don't agree. :-)

  • Mac Pro (Early 2008) shuts down unexpectedly

    I have a recurring problem with my Mac Pro (Early 2008). I put the computer to sleep; then, when I tap a few keys on the keyboard to wake it up, I hear the start-up sound and it boots up as if it were shut down.
    This is particularly strange, because I do not have to use the "power" button on the tower to turn it on. When I tap the keys on the keyboard, as if to wake it from sleep, it makes the start-up sound and boots. I am guessing that somehow it is shutting off when I first try to wake it from sleep, and then must re-boot. But this is odd behavior that I've never seen from any Mac, and I've been using them for almost 20 years.
    Any ideas? I'm going to call Apple Support but I always dread those long wait times and often fruitless conversations. I did not migrate information from my previous system; I took the time to manually migrate my files and reinstalled all apps from DVD specifically to avoid problems like this. Very frustrating.

    I've noticed the same problem for one day with my new MP 2.8 dualquad, got a reboot after every sleep.
    This solved the issue for me:
    • Reset the PRAM (Boot the machine and hold ALTCOMMAND+PR for 3 startup gongs)
    • Reset the SMC -> http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304123-en
    Good luck

  • Mac Pro RAID 0 setup with bootcamp

    I'm about to take the plunge and buy a Mac Pro as soon as I get the money (or credit) to. There have been things here and there that have turned me off but I found ways around some concerns, but this one I haven't been able to find.
    I am a musician and want to utilize raw power that Mac does so well with. But unfortunately my DAW of choice doesn't support OS X. I hate Vista, I never upgraded, I stayed with XP but have been willing to change to OS X with XP as well, to get the best of both worlds. Then i find my DAW doesn't support XP 64 bit so i am going to have to use Vista 64-bit (bummer).
    What I haven't been able to figure out is if it is possible to run a RAID 0 of the windows OS and all its data. The Mac Pro RAID card doesn't support any Windows OS so i am wondering if there is anyway possible to get the Windows OS in RAID, any good hardware or software that will accomplish this. Like if i get the Mac Pro RAID cad, is there a good software or hardware RAID that will allow me to install windows in a RAID 0 configuration?
    If its possible I would have no reasons to not move over, but I really need to have my RAID setup in windows since I am using latency sensitive disk streaming programs that need to stream files in the GBs
    Also could I just opt out for the Mac Pro Card and get a generic RAID card that supports both Windows and OS X? And if so any recommendations?
    Message was edited by: jmoss211

    I'm glad you are in the planning stages!
    The question I didn't know to ask is always the one that bites the worst.
    One of the best options might be the RR 4320
    http://www.hptmac.com/US/product.php?_index=50&viewtype=details
    http://www.barefeats.com/hard109.html
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Highpoint%20Technologies/RRAID4320/
    One of the first Mac Pro RAID and Boot Camp work?
    Games, hence the whole gaming graphics area, has and is not high on the list of features, which had been a large reason for people installing Windows on Mac.
    I didn't want to see you invest in SAS and not get performance level you want.
    StorageReview Performance SCSI/SAS vs VelociRaptor
    Here is the card Barefeats felt was the card that Apple has to beat, and points to some of the limitations of SAS on the Mac Pro. http://www.barefeats.com/hard104.html
    MacWorld SanFran in a couple weeks is when Apple traditionally would use to announce some of the new products for the next year (Snow, Mac Pro '09, new iMac, etc).
    Apple is not very upgradeable. It would cost me more to upgrade the cpu than buy new (though can get a good $$ on my system - in part because it runs the prior version of OS X 10.4 "Tiger". New systems will only run the current/latest OS, you won't be able to run Leopard if a system comes with Snow. The graphic choices and upgrades can be lame. It is almost a closed box.)
    I've talked to people that were into audio that used Fibre Channel in part due to low latency, increased queue depth (which is one area SATA has never implemented, 32 vs 256 I/O per sec).
    +Forget trying to use the Apple search to find threads, it is 'busted' if I can't find the thread mbean and I had with someone only last week on RAID5/6. I turned to Google to find this thread +
    Multi-core compiler optimization is big on Santa Intel's wish list to get into the hands of developers and vendors.
    *3 GHz Nehalem outperforms the latest Opteron by a margin as high as 80% and more.*
    Intel has apparently allowed HP and Fujitsu-Siemens to break the NDA on the Xeon 5570 processor for PR reasons as both companies have published SAP numbers on a Dual Xeon 5570. The Xeon 5570 is based on the same architecture as the Core i7. It is a 2.93 GHz quad-core CPU with 4 times a 256 KB L2-cache and one huge shared 8 MB L3.
    http://anandtech.com/weblog/showpost.aspx?i=532
    And AMD just gave Intel a new run for the money.
    AnandTech’s Johan de Gelas has taken a look at AMD and Intel quad-socket servers. The quad-socket six-core Intel Xeon X7460 at 2.66 GHz is compared to the quad-socket four-core Shanghai-based Opteron 8384 at 2.7 GHz. And what were the results of a test using VMware’s ESX Server 3.5?
    Shanghai’s 16 cores outperformed Dunnington’s 24 cores (or 48 if Hyper-Threading was used) by 6.5% or 8.8% depending on whether or not IBM or Dell’s chipset was used. But if we normalize that out per core, Shanghai outperforms by 59.8% (per core) or 63.2%. That is unbelievable!
    http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/amd-cleans-up-in-high-end-server-virtualizati on-20081223/

Maybe you are looking for