Mac Pro with 8800 Card Availability

On Jan 21 ETA for Mac Pro with 8800 card was 2-3 weeks. Now, on Feb 2, ( 12 days later ) ETA is still 2-3 weeks.
Anybody heard anything more definitive?

Why not just go out and buy the "stock" Mac Pro with the default ATI 2600XT card right now, and then just order the Nvidia 8800GT separately. Then when your 8800GT card finally arrives, sell the ATI card for $100 or so on eBay. All you will end up paying is about $70.00 more than the BTO option ($375 (including tax) for the 8800GT as a standalone option, minus $100 for selling the ATI 2600XT=$275 out of pocket cost vs. the $200 BTO option).
That way you can have your Mac Pro right away (as I have for the last 3 weeks), and still get my 8800GT at or around the same time as yours for only a $75.00 difference.
Having my new Mac Pro NOW is worth far more than saving $75.00. Time is $$$$$
My standalone Nvidia 8800GT is scheduled to arrive Feb 28th (according to Apple). I already have a buyer with the 1st. generation Mac Pro that will buy my ATI 2600XT when the 8800GT arrives.
Also, you might even have further delays with the BTO option if Nvidia has supply problems that could drag on into early to mid march if you hang with your current order.

Similar Messages

  • Mac PRo with raid card shipped with drive not suitable for raid?

    Hi all,
    I ordered a Mac Pro with raid card and a 1TB hard drive. The drive which came in the computer was WDC WD1001FALS which is not a hard drive rated for raid usage. On Western Digital's site they suggest using WD1002FBYS.
    Is the model WD1001FALS the correct drive which Apple ships although one ordered the raid card?

    The WD 640GB Blue, and WD 1TB Black are the only drive options for the mac pro; that's what you choose.
    The RE3 (or FBYS) is not an option sold through apple. Buying the raid card, is not going to change the drive.
    On whether to use the RE3 over the Blacks, it depends on how you will be using it. From what I've heard, the Blacks are enterprise drives themselves; basically with just a less robust firmware (no TLER). If you will have the drives on 24/7 in a raid 5, then yes, RE3 will probably be better. If not, I think the black will suffice; note the blacks are GREAT drives by themselves anyway.
    The apple raid card can connect to both SATA and SAS drives internally, however most times people buying the raid card want to use it for SAS drives. There are a lot more cheaper and possibly a lot more stable options then apple's raid card if you are looking to use SATA drives.
    Check amug:
    http://www.amug.org/
    A common problem with the apple raid card is the battery:
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/MA849Z/B?mco=NDc1ODczNw
    Lastly about enterprise drives, truthfully I don't see the difference really. I have enterprise drives in a 8-drive raid5 config running 24/7 as a server. 2 drives died on me after about 4 months. To top it off, they died within 10 min of each other, crushing the raid to pieces. Granted they were Seagate ES.2's, it's understandable
    The boot drive of the server is a stock desktop WD drive and running 24/7. It's been running for almost 4 years straight.

  • 10.5.2, Mac Pro with AE Card, AEBS (not Gigabit) lost wireless connection

    Since I upgraded to 10.5.2, I have been having issues with my wireless connection on my Mac Pro. Here's my setup - an 802.11n Airport Extreme Base Station (not gigabit one) with a 802.11g AEBS connected to it. the 802.11n is running on the 5GHz Spectrum only and does not share with 802.11a (so it's running 802.11n only). The 802.11g AEBS is set to run on the 2.4GHz Spectrum and is set to accept both 802.11g and 802.11b. The MacPro has an Airport Extreme Card running 802.11n. The 802.11n base station is almost next to the 2 base stations.
    Every once in a while, my Mac Pro will get disconnect to the basestation, and when I go to the Airport Signal icon, I can see both my basestation. I just have to select it again as if all of a sudden, my Mac Pro forgot which basestation it is connected to and get totally confused. It is one thing if the signal to the basestation is gone (have experienced that a few times when I have the 802.11g base station), it's something else to just get disconnected for no reason. Of course, when I select my basestation again, everything works fine (not as if it has problem re-establishing connection). This is getting a bit annoying, especially when I am trying to backup my files only to have been disconnected from the basestation. This doesn't happen every time I backup my files. It happens in random and there can be a long time without having drop the connection and then it can drop the connection 3 times in 10 minutes.
    Help!

    I have read all the other post, but got no satisfying answer other than people saying Apple really screwed up with 10.5.2 and that doesn't really resolve the problem. Plus, it seems to me that most people's problem are with a 3rd party base station rather than an AEBS. My only other option maybe to down grade my Airport Card software, because I think the problem is with the Airport Card driver that's bundled with the Mac Pro, and frankly, I am not sure if Apple is ignoring the problem or working hard on it, but in either case, it's not fast enough in term of damage control.

  • 2010 Mac Pro with Apple RAID card - "Drive carrier 00:03 removed"

    I've got a 2010 Mac Pro with the Apple RAID card and 4 internal identical Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB drives inside.
    I've never had a problem with the RAID card (either battery or in operation) except for one thing:
    Almost every time I shut the machine down (which I try to do as rarely as possible), it keeps losing Drive 3, the spare.
    (See RAID Utility event log snippet below.)
    [I wish I could understand why this Apple RAID card keeps losing the spare across power-cycles/reboots, but I digress.]
    So I just adopted it as the spare and it spawns the rebuild and many hours later, everything's fine again.
    ... until the last time I rebooted (Jan. 2nd).
    After the usual "I lost the spare" message upon login, it began the rebuild.
    But this time, about 11 1/2 hours later the rebuild stopped and RAID Utility reported "Drive carrier 00:03 removed".
    Bay 3 is now missing in the Controller view.
    I powered off the system last night, and left it off overnight.  Today I took all the drives out, blew the dust off and reseated them.
    Same thing.  Drive 3 is still missing, and now the rebuild task aborted.
    The drive bay location shouldn't matter, right?  Can I swap the Bay 3 drive with the Bay 4 drive?
    I figure one of two things would happen:
    (1) It will report Bay 3 as being there but Bay 4 as being missing, same situation as is now.  Meaning the problem is in the Bay 3 spare drive.
    (2) It will report Bay 3 as being missing (despite a 'good' drive being present) and Bay 4 will be the (unattached) spare, and the RAID set will be unviable.  Meaning the problem is with the drive bay itself, not whatever drive is plugged into it.
    If "Drive carrier removed" is trying to tell me the disk is bad, why do I not see any log messages about it?  I suppose a spare that never gets used could go bad from lack of use, but ... no messages at all?
    Hesitant to plunk down $160 on a new spare disk if the present one isn't actually dead ...
    % sudo raidutil list raidsetinfo
                                         Total     Avail
    Raidsets      Type       Drives       Size      Size  Comments
    RS1           RAID 5     1,2,4      5.23TB    0.00MB  Rebuild: 0% complete            
    % sudo raidutil list driveinfo
    Drives  Raidset       Size      Flags
    Bay #1  RS1             2.00TB   IsMemberOfRAIDSet:RS1 IsReliable
    Bay #2  RS1             2.00TB   IsMemberOfRAIDSet:RS1 IsReliable
    Bay #4  RS1             2.00TB   IsMemberOfRAIDSet:RS1 IsReliable
    Event log snippet:
    Saturday, January 11, 2014 8:15:19 AM PT
    Background task aborted: Task=Rebuild,Scope=DRVGRP,Group=RS1
    informational
    Friday, January 3, 2014 3:50:28 AM PT
    Drive carrier 00:03 removed
    informational
    Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:29:37 PM PT
    Marked drive in bay 3 as a global spare
    informational
    Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:29:28 PM PT
    Adopted drive in bay 3
    informational
    Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:28:34 PM PT
    Degraded RAID set RS1 - No spare available for rebuild
    critical
    Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:35:17 PM PT
    Marked drive in bay 3 as a global spare
    informational
    Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:35:08 PM PT
    Adopted drive in bay 3
    informational
    Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:34:11 PM PT
    The "RedundancyScrub" command could not be executed. (Invalid request or invalid parameter in the request.)
    warning
    Saturday, December 7, 2013 5:34:03 PM PT
    Degraded RAID set RS1 - No spare available for rebuild
    critical
    Friday, December 6, 2013 4:56:47 AM PT
    Battery finished conditioning
    informational
    Thursday, December 5, 2013 9:53:44 PM PT
    Battery started scheduled conditioning cycle (write cache disabled)
    informational
    Friday, September 6, 2013 10:53:11 PM PT
    Battery finished conditioning
    informational
    Friday, September 6, 2013 3:41:33 PM PT
    Battery started scheduled conditioning cycle (write cache disabled)
    informational
    Saturday, June 8, 2013 3:41:35 PM PT
    Battery finished conditioning
    informational
    Saturday, June 8, 2013 8:37:49 AM PT
    Battery started scheduled conditioning cycle (write cache disabled)
    informational
    Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:09:51 PM PT
    Marked drive in bay 3 as a global spare
    informational
    Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:09:42 PM PT
    Adopted drive in bay 3
    informational
    Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:08:59 PM PT
    Degraded RAID set RS1 - No spare available for rebuild
    critical
    Thursday, May 30, 2013 3:32:29 PM PT
    Degraded RAID set RS1
    warning

    Power Pig wrote:
    "Hesitant to plunk down $160 on a new spare disk if the present one isn't actually dead ...
    % sudo raidutil list raidsetinfo
                                         Total     Avail
    Raidsets      Type       Drives       Size      Size  Comments
    RS1           RAID 5     1,2,4      5.23TB    0.00MB  Rebuild: 0% complete     
    I was talking about this.
    This looks like a RAID 5 setup without the parity to me. I would said it basically a RAID 0.
    Also you metioned "I guess that previous spare must really have gone 'bad', despite having never been used! "
    I wiped everything out, I selected the 3 disks and clicked on "Create RAID Set" with RAID5 selected and the "Use unassigned drives as spares" option checked.  The 3rd disk has always been marked as the spare ever since then.  You do not have a choice to create a "RAID5 setup without the parity".  If I wanted a RAID0 I would have chosen a RAID0!  raidutil now says
    % sudo raidutil list raidsetinfo
                                         Total     Avail
    Raidsets      Type       Drives       Size      Size  Comments
    RS1           RAID 5     1,2,3,4    5.23TB    0.00MB  No tasks running
    Every time the system would 'lose' Drive 3 on boot, I would just keep rebooting until it was 'found', and then manually re-assign the now-'floating' drive as the spare - and the RAID would rebuild.
    There was never a problem until the day that prompted this post - when it would not find Drive 3 no matter what I did.  I turned the Mac Pro off for several hours until the drives had all cooled down and it still did not find the drive.  I left the machine on but unmounted the degraded volume until I got the new replacement drive.
    I really don't understand what you are getting at. It's like you are trying to tell me I set it up as a 4-drive RAID5 with no parity(!) and that I was in grave danger because one of the disks was gone.  The actual RAID contents (spread across Drives 1, 2 and 4) were never in danger, unless a 2nd disk had failed while the spare was not seen by the Apple RAID card.  I wasn't too worried about that happening.

  • I need an "Open CL compatible graphics card for an early 2008 Mac Pro with 1 gig of V-Ram", any recommendations? Thanks.

    I need an "Open CL compatible graphics card for an early 2008 Mac Pro with 1 gig of V-Ram", any recommendations?
    Thanks.

    BlackList:
    Final Cut Pro X, Motion 5, Compressor 4: Graphics card compatibility
    WhiteList:
    Final Cut Pro X, Motion 5, Compressor 4: Using OpenCL-enabled graphics cards
    OpenCL graphics cards available now, for any Mac Pro model, for a reasonable cost:
    Apple 5770 US$250 Avail: in stock
    Apple 5870 US$450 Avail: 2-3 weeks

  • Mac Pro with no airport card installed

    I have a Mac Pro with no airport card installed....Can I just purchase an Airport express and connect by ethernet to the Mac pro.... I use Air port Extreme as my router for other computers

    Yes, this is referred to as a ProxySTA in the business.
    HOWEVER, this only became available with the 802.11n Express. I haven't yet seen it OFFICIAL if the new second generation still supports ProxySTA. I'm a bit hesitant to say yes, because the new express leans a little closer to the Extremes which work quite differently.  (haven't had time to test this yet myself)
    I'm curious, why you don't just run an ethernet from your extreme to your Pro... I'm guessing because of the distance?

  • What displays WILL work with 1st gen Mac Pro & 4870 video card upgrade?

    I've been reading these discussion threads for hours.
    I, like so many others, have a 1st gen Mac Pro with a 1900XT that is taking a dump on me.
    My only/best option for replacing it is the 4870...
    But SO many folks with 3rd party displays have had problems, though almost no one is commenting on which 3rd party displays DO work.
    Can anyone help? Do you have this configuration and a 3rd party display that IS working?
    I don't want to buy this card and find out I have to shell out another ton of $$$ to buy Cinema Display.
    I have an LG Flatron Wide...
    Can anyone confirm a 3rd party display that DOES work? I'd be VERY grateful!

    I have the Acer 24". been fine for 18 months. I know several people using them

  • Creating a wireless connection on a Mac Pro with no airport card.

    Hello
    Forgive me if this has already been discussed but I am looking at all options to add wireless function to a mac pro with OS10.4 that does not currently have an airport card installed. My options so far are to either purchase a airport card, purchase a USB wireless dongle i.e.: D-Link DWA-140 (for which I am having trouble finding something that is compatible) or possibly using a airport express. The objective is to use it for presentations for lectures as I am using keynote and would very much like to use the keynote remote from my iPod touch (later with a iPad) so I can control my presentation wirelessly.
    My question is this, will I be able to use an airport express, connect it via ethernet to the mac pro and create the wireless connection with my iPod touch? Will I require a wireless router? Or can anyone suggest an easy way to wireless control a keynote presentation with a non wireless mac.
    Thank you so much.
    Dave

    This is not an exact answer to your question, but we had cable installed today (Virgin Media, UK) and the router is too far for my MacPro tower to connect. The engineer gave me a wireless dongle (the D-Link DWA-140) and said it would do the trick. After a few hours of searching online, I cannot make the dongle connect to the router, so I would recommend that you avoid this option for a MacPro. It may be possible to connect it but I'm certainly not finding it straightforward.

  • Mac Pro with Apple Raid Card - 1 drive OSX (JBOD) + 1 drive Vista?

    Can anyone walk me through what I'd need to do to set up an early 2008 model Mac Pro with the Apple Raid Card pre-installed and 2 500 gig drives, so that I can have OSX on the first drive and Vista on the second?
    I know it defeats the purpose of the raid card, but...
    What I've done so far is:
    1. Removed drive #2
    2. Install and using Raid Utility, add the first drive as a JBOD set/volume
    3. After install, shut down the machine
    4. Re-add drive #2
    5. Restart
    6. Use disk utility to add drive #2
    I tried to use bootcamp, but it only wants to put windows on the first drive - which won't work because it is RAID.

    Run Vista off an ATA interface in the 2nd optical drive. There is an SATA 2 ATA adapter.
    I think you can boot Vista off some RAID controllers, check out Highpoint RocketRAIDs. Should be able to configure the RR.
    Boot Vista off USB is a stretch.

  • Mac Pro with two graphic card each one with two dvi output, can I extend deskop to three outputs?

    Mac Pro with two graphic card each one with two dvi output, can I extend deskop to three outputs?

    MAC OS 10.7.4  3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon processors, 12GB  of 800MHz DDR2 and 2 ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB (two dual-link DVI ports) . The problem is, I woul like to use one output as main and the three others as secondary or extended desktop but the system don't allow me use two diferent video cards this way.

  • Mac Pro with X1900 XT graphics card EFI boot display

    Hi all,
    I've got this problem with my mac pro with ATI Radeon X1900 XT - 1st DVI connected to the 23 inch apple display and the 2nd DVI connected to my optoma dlp projector.
    My problem is that the EFI boot menu shows up on the 2nd DVI connection. So basically I see the boot menu only on the projector when it should have been on my apple display.
    Can someone please help me figure this out. Can't seem to find any on google or anywhere else.
    Thanks in advance for the help!

    Sorry, I forgot to add that small detail..
    I can switch both connections and it'll work for the mac part of the deal but the windows end cant switch screens - making the apple display the primary display on windows..
    now it sounds like a "windows" issue doesnt it!?heh

  • Early 2008 Mac Pro + nVidia 8800: Never going to work?

    This forum is littered with threads about early 2008 Mac Pros with the nVidia 8800 card - none of them positive.
    I was unfortunate enough to wait for Apple to release such a machine and buy it. Graphics performance is dire given the hardware available. The machine routinely crashes with the window manager hang problem (the user interface just locks up, yet network services etc. still work), in the way familiar to anyone blighted by this particular bug; just run the Folding@Home client on your machine if you want to experience the joy. Or screensavers, sometimes, so I've had to turn those off. And I've had to turn off monitor power saving too, because I too suffer from the 'monitors sometimes don't wake up' bug. And of course I can't sleep the machine either, because firmware upgrade or not, it's still not reliable. And after all this, still the machine crashes.
    SSH to the machine; try to restart cleanly; even 'sudo reboot' won't restart it. Apple have achieved something I've never seen out of any Unix or Unix-like operating system, ever; the kernel is unable to kill its own processes.
    There have been no indications from Apple that I've seen on these forums over several weeks that the problem is even being acknowledged, let alone tackled. Latest reports indicate that even the 1st gen Mac Pro owners are suffering if they install the 8800.
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1460752&tstart=0
    My machine rarely makes it through the day without a forced reboot due to the window manager hanging. I can't do any work on it. I can't rely on it. I can't enjoy it. I can't even use it for web browsing without fear of it hanging.
    There seem to be no facts about this at all. So all I can ask for is opinions. Does anyone have any offering of hope that early 2008 Mac Pros might ever work properly with 8800 cards? Y'know, little things, like actually being able to handle graphics? Or sleeping the monitors? Or, heaven forbid, sleeping the whole machine? Or should I just send it back as unfit for purpose?
    Yours, tired and exasperated... :-/

    I posted this in some other blog (forum), I should have posted this here also but I hope this gives you and all with these problems hope!! I also ran some fish tank test some else posted to get the folding problem to happen and I can not get it to happen at all now, and since my 8800 went in I get NO LOCKUPS, SCREEN FREEZES, shaky blurry video when I boot, so far NOTHING, IT JUST WORKS!!!!!!!!
    Now that I think about it the person who said to use the fish tank program had a bad 8800 and maybe you do also!! here is the link to that:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6965475&#6965475
    I purchased my first mac pro early 08 2 months ago (amazon.com).
    2 quad core 2.8's, 2 gig apple 4 gig OWC total 6 gig ram,2-WD raptors (1st mac 2nd boot camp winxp 32 bit), apple care.
    I had all my problems with the ATI card (I always purchased ATI, never Nvidia, for all the PC's I built) a couple of times I bought the first ones out, these had all kinds of problems until good drivers that actually worked were released (usually 6-12 months after the release of the card).
    So I try not to buy routers, graphic cards, etc.. for at least 6-12 months, but back to my 2600 card!!
    When I received my mac the graphics would freeze, I did a lot of online reading only to find out the ATI 2600 was the problem, the cure was to hook up 2 monitors to the card (and that worked!!).
    Then they came out with the firmware update, now my main monitor would after 2 days on a reboot be scambled (samsung syncmaster 213t, NEVER had ANY problem with it before on any PC I had, so I knew it was not the monitor) to fix the problem I had to either turn power off to the syncmaster or resetting PRAM (worked for a couple more days, then the same problem).
    I called apple and they sent a tech out within days to replace the ATI card, the replacement did the same thing after a couple of days, so I called Apple back and they took a bunch of info from my computer (BTW not much at all loaded in the mac side) and said to call back in a week, so I called back a week later and they said they were going to exchange the card for either another ati 2600 or the Nvidia 8800, I said 8800 and a day later on a saturday I received it, swapped the card and NEVER HAD ANY PROBLEMS at all!!
    So I don't know if the ATI card has problems with certain monitors or they are just poorly made (maybe AMD is mad with Apple that Apple did not use AMD processors).
    I have read others that swapped with the 8800 and their problems went away also!!!!
    Maybe some have no problems with the 2600, but I would not recommend it to anyone, if you can avoid the 2600 GO WITH THE 8800, the drivers will get better (and the 8800 will eventually outperform the ATI)and you will not be sorry.
    Apple is awesome, they are 2nd to none, their is no other company like this anymore that I have dealt with in a long time (not just because they gave me a 8800), like I said in the beginning of this post I always purchased ATI cards and would have kept it if it would have worked but 2 doing the same, ATI [AMD] has lost my support until they prove otherwise.
    I recommend Mac's to everyone now!!
    good luck and let me know it any of this has helped!!!!!!!!!!

  • Is it possible to upgrade the Mac Pro with SCSI/SAS drives?

    Hi guys I am considering to move on to a Mac Pro from my old PC.
    The Mac Pro enclosure is quite unique in its hard drive holders as no cables are used and all drives are connected with a plugin mechanism.
    So I am curious if that will allow me to upgrade to a SCSI/SAS storage system which requires cable connections between drives and the SCSI/SAS card on the PCI-E slot. I dont know if this will be possible with the Mac Pro enclosure.
    Has anyone tried to do this？
    Btw is there any Ultra320 or SAS(preferably) interface card available for Mac OS X?

    The connectors for SATA drives can be used with SAS drives. However, the controller needs to be SAS compatible. I have never installed a SAS drive in the Mac Pro bay to see what happens. If some one has a SAS drive and wants to try this I would be interested in the results.
    My guess is that the Mac Pro would not see the drive.
    Areca sells the Mac Pro PCIe bootable ARC-1680 SAS controller in several configurations. This controller allows the user to utilize SAS or SATA hard drives connected to the card. The ARC-1680x comes with two external mini SAS connectors that can support eight direct connect hard drives or up to 128 devices (in theory) when used with SAS expanders.
    The ARC-1680LP has one internal mini SAS port and one external mini SAS port. I looked at the Mac Pro internal SATA connectors and they can unscrew from the frame but there is only about 1/2" of clearance in that area of the case. In addition, I would want the hot swap bays to still operate and I did not see an easy way to patch into the existing SATA connectors. It would be nice if the Mac Pro factory connectors used snap on SATA connector on the back of the backplane so that users could interface the 4 SATA bays with an internal PCie controller. However, its hard wired in the existing configuration. With the new Mac Pro PCIe RAID 5 card on the market there must be alternative connectors that allow this type of installation to work properly.
    Based on the ease at which the Areca SAS controller can be added as an external using the ARC-1680x I went with that option. I am using it with eight direct connect SATA hard drives now. I plan to expand the storage by adding a SAS expander in the form of a hub or an enclosure with SAS capabilities. I have been looking at a 16 bay SAS enclosure but I am not sure how loud it will be
    Details on the ARC-1680 can be found here:
    http://www.areca.com.tw/products/pcietosas1680series.htm
    Its very cool to have SAS or SATA capability along with a bootable card that can support tons of hard drives and RAID levels 0, 1,1E, 3, 5, 6, 10, 30, 50, 60 or JBOD . I booted the Mac Pro with a 2TB Mac OS X 10.4.10 RAID 6 volume and ran Xbench. It shows a 400MB/sec. hard drive setup and raises the overall Xbench score substantially.
    While I doubt I will boot the Mac Pro from the RAID 6 volume much, it is very cool that that function is available. This is the only PCIe host adapter I have found with boot capabilities besides Apples new $999 4 port SATA internal card. SAS has lots of expansion capabilities. Users that want pretty much unlimited hard drive connectivity will enjoy the new ARC-1680x.
    Have fun!

  • Mac Pro + GeForce 8800 GT 512MB + WoW?

    Hi,
    Does anyone got experience from using a Mac Pro and the graphics card 8800 GT 512MB for playing World of Warcraft? I currently play on a iMac 24" and can only run the game in mid-ranged settings. Which disappoints me.
    I want:
    - to play on a Macintosh in Mac OSX. I work in this environment too. I am not interested in dualboot with bootcamp.
    - to be able to maximize all graphical settings in WoW. Including some AA on a 23" inch display.
    Can a Mac Pro with this graphic card handle this with decent FPS? Everything below 40 FPS is unacceptable.

    This is an example log (I posted it in another thread too):
    Tue Feb 26 22:50:36 2008
    panic(cpu 7 caller 0x001A8C8A): Kernel trap at 0x0106e15c, type 14=page fault, registers:
    CR0: 0x8001003b, CR2: 0x7555dea8, CR3: 0x014c4000, CR4: 0x00000660
    EAX: 0x7555dea0, EBX: 0x00000000, ECX: 0x00000004, EDX: 0x00001101
    CR2: 0x7555dea8, EBP: 0x8322fef8, ESI: 0x1a9f5c00, EDI: 0x6bb6b000
    EFL: 0x00010202, EIP: 0x0106e15c, CS: 0x00000008, DS: 0x83220010
    Error code: 0x00000000
    Backtrace, Format - Frame : Return Address (4 potential args on stack)
    0x8322fcd8 : 0x12b0e1 (0x457024 0x8322fd0c 0x13321a 0x0)
    0x8322fd28 : 0x1a8c8a (0x460550 0x106e15c 0xe 0x45fd00)
    0x8322fe08 : 0x19eb67 (0x8322fe20 0xcfed000 0x8322fef8 0x106e15c)
    0x8322fe18 : 0x106e15c (0xe 0x48 0x10 0x10)
    0x8322fef8 : 0x1072210 (0x6bb6b000 0xddbd4e4 0x8322ffc8 0x19714c)
    0x8322ff18 : 0x41e7db (0x6bb6b000 0xc52d200 0x1 0x19d311)
    0x8322ff68 : 0x41d938 (0xc52d200 0x0 0x0 0x0)
    0x8322ff98 : 0x41d61a (0xc5ed9c0 0x0 0xc853720 0x0)
    0x8322ffc8 : 0x19e93c (0xc5ed9c0 0x0 0x1a20b5 0xddbce20)
    Backtrace terminated-invalid frame pointer 0
    Kernel loadable modules in backtrace (with dependencies):
    com.apple.GeForce(5.2.4)@0x1058000->0x10defff
    dependency: com.apple.NVDAResman(5.2.4)@0xc21000
    dependency: com.apple.iokit.IONDRVSupport(1.5)@0xc13000
    dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily(2.4.1)@0x788000
    dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOGraphicsFamily(1.5.1)@0xbf7000
    BSD process name corresponding to current thread: kernel_task
    Mac OS version:
    9C31
    Kernel version:
    Darwin Kernel Version 9.2.0: Tue Feb 5 16:13:22 PST 2008; root:xnu-1228.3.13~1/RELEASE_I386
    System model name: MacPro3,1 (Mac-F42C88C8)

  • Upgrading Mac Pro (Rev1) Video card to 8800GT - Win XP OK?

    Hi all,
    I have a Rev1 Mac Pro with the ATI X1900 graphics card. I'd like to order the Apple upgrade to the Nvidia 8800GT for better performance running games in Windows.
    Currently, I have an XP SP3 Boot Camp partition. I've read some posts about problems users have had with the 8800 upgrade under XP.
    Can anyone confirm that the 8800 upgrade will work under XP, or if I should switch to Vista? I'm anticipating sticking with DX9 unless that would make a difference in terms of compatibility.
    Thanks for any advice!

    You can use any PC card for Windows only. I know there were problems in the past with XP drivers, but don't know if that is still true today (I'd be surprised, it is after all basically G92 series card, which is very common).
    Personally, I think Vista 64-bit just makes more sense with Mac Pro at this point, more RAM, dual cpu, and it isn't like you don't have the power to run or that they would run poorly on that hardware.
    Might give you some ideas games on Mac Pro running Vista:
    http://www.barefeats.com/harper11.html
    http://www.google.com/search?q=Nvidia8800GT+XP+driverproblem

Maybe you are looking for