Mac Scanner file size is very large

I have recently scan some documents to my computer, however, I have notice some document file size are large, and some documents are small.
I accidentally scan a duplex document and single page. I find out that combine page increase each page by 100KB, consider the scanned single page is 20KB.
Both Scan do not have difference in scan quality.
It really bothers me because all previous scan unnecessary tripple in size.
Can any body explain about the anomaly?

Hi,
The file size increases due to the high formatting options in BI 7.0.
Remove the formatting option from the work book setting in the Bex analyzer in design mode.
REDDY

Similar Messages

File size is very large in 7.0 coamparing to 3.X

Hi,
When saving the query in 7.0 the file size become very large as compare to saving the same query with the same amount of data in 3.X. Is there any solution to take care of this problem and reduced the file size in 7.0. Please advice.
Thanks
Isac

Hi,
The file size increases due to the high formatting options in BI 7.0.
Remove the formatting option from the work book setting in the Bex analyzer in design mode.
REDDY

When using crop tool based on canvas size dimensions, the file size becomes very large

Can someone explain how to best figure out crop tool settings to maintain relative file size? I tried to use the image / canvas size information to set the crop tools dimensions, but the file saved is 10 times larger than the original.
Thanks!

What exact version of Photoshop? There were changes to the crop tool as of CS6, althoughy there's an option to use Classic (the old crop tool behaviour).
It wouldn't hurt to specify your platform (Mac or Win)…
If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand, such as your platform (Mac or Win), exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop and of Bridge, machine specs, what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far, what error message(s) you receive, if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them, etc., someone may be able to help you better and faster.
Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
Thanks!

How do I split a pdf file when the file size is too large?

How do I split a pdf file when the file size is too large? Thanks!

With Adobe Acrobat. It can also optimize your document to make the size smaller.

"File size is too large"

When I imported the only 4 files in a particular folder (scans of photos) into the Organiser, the message "File size is too large" came up for two of them instead of preview images, although do appear to have been added to the Catalog as their MB size, pixel dimensions and creation date show in the Properies General tab.
I take it this must relate to pixel count and not the file size per se as the two tifs (13.2 and 13.3 MB but 1792 x 2508 and 2518 x 1798 pixels) are fine, while the two JPGs (12.9 and 30.8 MB and 9616 x 6480 and 7048 x 10376) are the ones without preview images?
I wasn't aware of this as a problem, so can anybody tell me please, have I just set too low a limit somewhere or is there a real restriction?
And is this new to PSE6 or something that's been around for a while?
Thanks, Peter

I have a 212mb psd file (a panorama). I have Elements 6.0 and 4 meg RAM, Vista.
I went through the regedit process as outlined in Adobe Technote kb402760 and upped it to 1,000,000,000. I would think that would have given enough headroom for my file size. But it didn't. I still have the generic "file size too large" on my thumbnails.
I did note that the tech note had a different location for the Software/Adobe/Elements 6.0/Organizer (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\ ) from the location in my file structure. In fact, this string was listed in at least three places OTHER THAN the one indicated in the Technote. How likely is it that adding "MaxImageSize" to the Elements 6.0 register locations other than specifically indicated is the reason why the file size capacity was not increased. Why doesn't Elements show up in the location indicated by the Tech Note?
NOTE FOR ADOBE: Why isn't this a more easily accessible option in the user interface? If I have a large file that slows things down a bit on my thumbnails, that could be my choice. This artificial constraint built into the regedits that no one goes to is too much like parental controls for 5 year olds.

Trying to email a video and the file size is to large to attach.

Trying to email a friend a video and it says the file size is to large to attach. How do I change this?

Go into your photo-video program and change the file size to the smallest resolution possible. Also limit the video to less than 30 seconds to a minute.
Then try sending again. The problem you are having is because the file is too large to send via the method you are using.
Good Luck

Setting resolution, deciding file type, for very LARGE Canvas prints. 36MP camera.

Okay, so I noticed my lightroom was on 240 PPI resolution. I changed it to 300 because I read 300 was for standard prints. What would I need to set the export to in the resolution box for a very large Canvas?
Is it better to choose Tiff instead of Jpeg for prints of this quality, if not then what should I choose?
I am using a Sony A7R full frame 36.4MP and with some of the sharp Zeiss lens there is really no pixelation that noticeable when I zoom in 100 percent. Of course the A7R is being said to be one of the best Sensors on the market today. It's supposed to be like the Nikon D800E, but apparently it has some advantages.
In other words, I want to export in as high of quality as possible for the Canvas. File size is not an issue.

Changing the resolution setting does absolutely nothing to the digital image. This is a common misconception. The only thing that counts in the digital image is the pixel dimensions. Regardless of what the PPI setting is (240, 300, 600, whatever) the image still has the same number of pixels. To determine what you need for a print of any size it is necessary to multiply the inches by the desired pixels per inch. Suppose you want a 16 x 20" print at 300 pixels per inch. The math would be something like this:
300x16 = 4800 pixels
300x20 = 6000 pixels
So to print a 16 x 20" print you would need an image that is 4800 x 6000 pixels. And the PPI setting can be anything you want it to be because it has no effect on the image.

Media Encoder File Size Estimates Very Inaccurate (How to Reduce Blu-ray File Size)

Hello there!
I made several wedding videos last summer and exported my video and footage to HD .m2t files using a high profile h.264 codec and they always came out being plenty small to fit on my single layer Blu-ray disks. But this year I filmed a wedding (same camera) but my files seem way larger, so I'm doing something different, and I'm not sure what. Should I use MPEG2?
I'm attaching an image of my Encoder settings. I will say that the files it outputs are playing at the proper rate (in this case, the video rate hovers around 12mb/s like it should). Encoder estimates a file size of 2.7 gb, but the final file is 16.4 gb. That's not very close. This file is full HD, 23.976 fps, 8-bit and about 30 minutes long. I should be able to easily fit this, and the other videos I need on the same disk at these low data rates right? I have some of my Disney Blu-ray movies ripped on my computer and they play at 40 mb/s. That's twice my max rate and those files are 20 gb for an hour of video (including 3 5.1 audio streams, a 7.1 stream and several subtitle tracks, I just have stereo audio).
So should I switch all my files to MPEG2? What are your favorite settings for a putting Canon DSLR h.264 footage on Blu-ray? Thanks!
EDIT: I re-exported using MPEG2 and the file estimates were correct.

Encore, and I suspect most authoring programs, allows a maximum of 40 Mbps COMBINED video and audio. so anything over 35Mbps video only risks problems.
I don't know what all the specific differences are between Adobe Media Encoder/PR/EN's H.264 preset vs the H.264-Bluray, but bitrate going over 35 is one of them. And Encore clearly does not like that. Many encoders result in small (and for some larger) variations that result in spikes over the allowed level. Any of those issues can result in Encore "seeing" a file as not BD legal.
I think all Ann was saying was the she agreed with your using the H.264-BD present with multiplexing off. And she suggested (I thing with the H.264-BD preset) selecting the max bit depth. I'm not sure if she actually meant max bit depth, or max render quality.

Reducing file size produces a larger file (?)

I have a 3.8mb pdf (created in Acrobat 9) that I'd like to reduce in size. It's text only (about 450 pages) and when I select "Reduce file size" Acrobat X goes through steps to optimize it for the web, and it comes out 5.1 mb. Not really much of a reduction in size if it's now a meg and a half larger than the original. Is there a better way to do this that I'm missing here?

There are many things that could cause the issues. Under the Optimize option (or wherever it went in AAX) there is an audit function that allows you to see where the storage is going. You could compare before and after optimization to see what was happening. You say 450 pages is not much, but that all depends on what is there. If it is a lot of graphics, it could be huge. If you use a lot of different fonts, that can cause extra storage of all those fonts. So there are many variables and sometimes they do get bigger -- happened to me too. Unfortunately, when you are trying to make things smaller, you are often under the gun and don't have time to diddle around. Good luck.

My jpeg file sizes are much larger than they used to be.

Just recently the file sizes on my .jpeg files have become excessively larger than they used to be just a week or so ago. Where I used to go almost a week to need to archive to DVD a bunch of saved images, I've now got to save to DVD almost daily.
For example, a 300x300 pixel image which shoud be about 32 Kb reads 383 Kb in the finder. I'm not doing anything to these images, just draging and droping.
Where I used to get 7 K files on a DVD, I'm now getting less than 2 K files to each disc.
Any thoughts on what's changed and how to fix it?

What App & JPEG compression rating are you using, some apps can reduce file size by dropping colors for instance...

Using the Premiere pro CC 2014 exported media file size is much larger than estimate, also is so much bigger than Premiere CS 6?

I used the preset H,264 Youtube 1080HD to export a video. The estimate size is 7308 MB {after I reduce the nitrate). The final size is 11.18 GB.
Why is so much different? Befor I Use the Premiere CS6 to export a simial size use the same format Is around 6GB.

First of all, the estimated file size just an estimate based chiefly on the combination of the bitrate and duration. The actual size can vary significantly, depending in large part on the amount of change from frame to frame throughout the video. For example, if you encode two clips of identical duration to exactly the same settings, the only difference being the nature of the content--say on is a talking head interview shot with the camera locked down on a tripod while the other is skateboarding footage that was shot handheld--the size of two resulting outputs files will be widely divergent.
As to the comparison between CS6 and CC2014, note that the settings for some presets have been changed. For instance, the h.264 YouTube 1080 presets went from 8Mbps to 16.

Trying to make video smaller but file size comes out larger

I'm not aquainted with how to reduce both the file image and keep the file size small also.
I start out with a 3mb file that has a window of 640 x 474.
I run it through streamclip and re-save export to quicktime with a window size of 320 x 240. I would think that this would cut the file size in half also, but the file, although it now displays in the smaller window size, which I need for placement in a web page, the file size has jumped up to 14mb. Apple Intermediate Codec and 50% quality setting. I don't see how the file has bloated in size to such a great degree.
Please help me discover the error of my ways.
Ken

Thanks for responding MartinR, I tried the H.264 codec with MPEG-4 ACC audio and that brought it down to about a 1.5mb filesize on one and 3.5mb filesize on the the other. I still don't know what the discrepancy is to make theme different in file size now, but I do now have two files that work fine on the internet at the new screen size. I appreciate your input and response to my question.
Ken
To your question above:
Frame size: 640 x 474
FPS: 29.91
Compression: ACC, Stereo, 48,000 KHz
Sorenson Video 3 Decompressor Millions +

Incopy file size increasing--Please help make it stop

When our designer opens an indesign file and checks out an incopy story for editing, the file size grows very large once the story is checked back in. For example, a story with a file size of 200kb grows to 6,000kb when we check it back in. The incopy file has a lot of conditional text and the indesign file contains many layers and images- could this be the problem? When our editior checks files in and out using only incopy, this issue does not occur. Any advice on how to stop this from happening?

Yes but I took a more careful look at the XML. I have over 57,000 urls in one example of a file. Looking more closely I have a group of urls (obviously from a story placed elsewhere in the document) The first grouping of URLs is in the format:
<HyperlinkURLDestination Self="u8b17" Name="http://www.iberia.com" DestinationURL="http://www.iberia.com" Hidden="false" DestinationUniqueKey="984"/>
But after those appear (let's say there are 50) there's a different format to the data and it repeats that set of URLs many, many times (the examples I have included I specifically chose because they are of the same URL):
<HyperlinkURLDestination Self="u9a81" Name="URL 44" DestinationURL="http://www.iberia.com" Hidden="false" DestinationUniqueKey="1027"/>
The difference is the "Name=" parameter.
What's weird is the InCopy documents seem to pick up the URLS as I keep working in the InDesign document.
I used the InCopy forum because they are InCopy documents and I just thought I could reach more InCopy-savvy persons in this forum. But I export my InCopy (.icml) documents from InDesign. I very seldom use InCopy. Though a co-worker does to make edits. I'm convinced the root of the problem is in InDesign.
I am on Mac OS 10.6 running InDesign (and InCopy) CS4 (6.04) I am not using any any third-party plug ins.
And as far as the check-in.check-out stuff I did switch the terminology around in at least one part of my post. I manually check-in my .icml files (in InDesign) after I have made changes in InDesign.
Phew!

Acceptable File Size and Resolution for Still Photos in Keyframe Motion

Hello Hello
I know that FCE HD (as other Video Editors), will automatically fit a still photo's size to it's default capability of 720 x 480 Correct?
Well, in regard to making the best possible ZOOMS, and Pans from Still Photos, is it neccessary to re-size all your photos (from an external editor like photoshop), to a specfic size?
According to an older book for FCE, it sez that actually photos re-sized to 720x534 with a resolution of 72 are best. *The proper proportion for NTSC.
And I noticed that when I inserted larger JPG still sizes (like about a meg), on the FCE timline, and when applying Panning, or Zooms, some of the rendered images with motion didn't pan or zoom smoothly.
Is that because those file sizes were TOO large?
Well I have soooo many stills that need to be imported into this particular project that it would be a lot easier for me to just generally reduce these stills (by percentage).
And is the magic resolution amount supposed to be 72?
Because if that's the case I can re-size all my photos to 72, and try to keep the file sizes down to say 300 KB's or so.
Sound like a plan?

Thank you guys
"basically, you should try to make your images large enough so they never have to be scaled beyond 100% in the motion tab in fcp."
Actually as I mentioned some of these file sizes are very large. About 800-900 KB's - and what as a result, what I've noticed is that I actually had to DECREASE the viewing area in both the Browser Window, and the Canvas Winbow just to be able to see the whole image.
Ok - so the 72 DPI is not as important as the dimensions of the photo. But as I said I have soooooo many of these that it would take me forever to manually re-size them all not to mention the fact that re-sizing some of them (odd shapes),would throw the images out of balance.
So again I ask - if there is NO motion applied to the photo, file sizes of about 200 to 350 KB's appear just beautifully ....
BUT
If I need to PAN or ZOOM, is it ok to laod a 1 MEG sized JPG onto the timeline and start working with Keyframe?????
In fact in some cases I'm actually using these larger file JPS's (1 meg or more), so that they TOTALLLY fit the canvas window (cropping them by enlargment)
*With some clipping of the original image of course ...
Why do I do this?
So that you don't see the usual border with horizontal images, or vertical images - know what I mean?
Thanx

How to Render in Premiere pro CS 5.5 High quality but low file size

Hello everybody,
I am using premiere pro CS5.5. I have rendered in premiere pro .mts file this settings : (NTSC, 1280X720,245fps,VBR 1 pass, target bit rate 6mb and max bitrate 9.0mb) my original file size : 2.1GB. after rendering file size 683MB. but render file is flickering. if i increase bid rate, then file no flickering but file size be very large. have any suggestion to reduce file size without flickering.
N.B: This video is green screen shot. so, i use some effect such as (chroma key and noise remover).

Try the Photoshop forum. The PS experts hang out over there.
http://forums.adobe.com/community/photoshop

Mac Scanner file size is very large

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for