Macally drops support for Post-Op/iMedia FCP Keyboard on Intels

Though I doubt you can buy one anymore, and Post-Op the company I paid $180.00 to, no longer sells them, I thought I would post this info for those using it now, or finding an old one on e-bay.
PRODUCT: Post-Op EZ keyboard is just a repackaged Macally iMedia Key keyboard. You used the Macally iMedia software to program the custom button along the top, and you could program an eject button, which the new Mac Pros need, (though F12 would work for one optical bay). While the keys still work for input, without updated software you can't program the buttons now on Intel Tiger or Intel Leopard. I wrote them and this was the Christmas cheer message I received.
Dear Customer,
Thank you for contacting us.
I am sorry that we'll not have Intel Mac driver support for this keyboard.
For Eject, you may press and hold the F12 key for 1 second to open/close the CD tray.
If you have any question, please let me know. Wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year,
Tom - Tech Support
Macally Peripherals
4601 E. Airport Dr.
Ontario, CA 91761 USA
Phone: 909-230-6778 EXT. 151
FAX: 909-230-6889
www.macally.com
Learned an expensive lesson on buying "custom" keyboards, think twice.

Similar Messages

Why does firefox drop support for a plugin with an update

Why the H*ll does Firefox drop support for a plugin when there is an update in Firefox.
FF4 has reported that 6 of my plugins that work fine in 3.6 are now not supported. !! This is a joke, and happens regularly.
As a user (a highly IT literate one) this is annoying and frustrating, and from a design standpoint, unprofessional.

Plugins as in Flash, Java, quicktime or such or do you mean Extensions ?
Plenty of Plugins seems to be detected and in use by Firefox 4.0 just fine according to your system details by your post.
If you meant Extensions then check for updates, look at addons.mozilla.org or the Extension homepage for to see if the author has provided a update.
Generally Extensions can need anywhere from a simple maxversion bump to a lot more for it to work properly on a new Major version of Firefox depending on what the Extension does.
It is professional actually as extensions that were not actually compatible may actually cause problems big or small if they were to still just ''work'' in a new Major version release so hence the need for them to be properly up to date on any changes and hopefully the extension author is quick about it.

Why is Adobe dropping support for pre 3GS phones?!

I think it's a bad decision to drop support for pre 3GS devices. There are still many out there and if support is dropped we're forced to still use the old PFI to reach the complete audience.
It's clear that OpenGL ES 2 offers a lot more fancy stuff than OpenGL ES 1.5 does, but still, things like GPU_VECTOR or sophisticated blending are perfectly doable with OpenGL ES 1.5.
And if a clean implementation is really not possible, Adobe should at least allow to publish for old devices even if this means that not all optimization techniques can be used.
I develop iPhone apps using different technologies and AIR is attractive for me because I can target with one project a big range of different plattforms. If Adobe drops support for old phones, this advantage is heavily shortened!
What is your opinion on the this development?

Apple have dropped support for pre-3GS because to pull of the features and performance in iOS 4.3 they had to develop just for the ARM7 chip, and not for the ARM6. They probably have a good sense of the number of people that have the older devices, and think it's ok to not update the software on those devices.
The same may be true for Adobe.
I am trying to find out how to make AIR 2.6 and AIR 2.0 live together in Flash CS5. If I work it out I'll let you know.

Firefox dropping support for optgroups?

It seems that Firefox 4 has dropped support for <optgroup> elements? Why would such a great web development browser do this? Also, the box model has changed with this release.
Not good guys.

Plugin are installed outside the control of Firefox and Firefox usually scan specific registry keys to find a specific plugin.
As long as MS makes a Silverlight plugin available for Firefox then you can use Silverlight in Firefox.

No Oracle SSO support for POSTing data to protected resource [yet]

Hi,
I am using OHS infront of JBOSS and redirecting all requests from OHS to JBOSS after SSO Authentication.
Everything works fine except that I get 500 error when I try to post data from HTML form.
When i click on a button on a JSP page that submits page with the Form Post, the request goes to the OHS and is not getting forwarded.
OHS log shows the following
127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2007:08:57:23 -0400] "POST /Sample/protected/standard.do HTTP/1.1" 500 788
Proxy_error.log shows the followin error
[Tue Sep 11 08:57:23 2007] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] [ecid: 1189515443:10.6.2.137:268:5568:74,0] \n[OSSO] E09: No Oracle SSO support for POSTing data to protected resource [yet].\n
Any idea?
Thanks
Srikar.

This error does no occur in our dev or test environments, only production. A workaround for us was to disable SSO by commenting the line to load it in the file $ORACLE_HOME/Apache/Apache/conf/httpd.conf. The line to comment out looks like: include "/u01/app/oracle/product/mid/Apache/Apache/conf/mod_osso.conf" where the /u01/app... above is the expansion of $ORACLE_HOME/Apache/Apache/conf/mod_osso.conf.
We do not use SSO for our application, so this is not a problem. I next plan to try to figure out why this behaves like this, so I can keep all the server configurations consistent.
HTH,
Mark

Dropped support for high-def dvd?

Does anyone know if Mavericks dropped support for the HD DVD format offered by Compressor 3?
A DVD authored with this format will not play on an iMac (2.4 Intel Core 2 Duo) running Mavericks, but will play on a Mac Pro (2x2Ghz Dual-Core Intel Xeon) running Mac OS 10.6.8. Other DVDs play fine on the iMac.
Thanks in advance for any information regarding this.

The CalDigit card is not rated to work on the NEWEST MacPros...the ones with different processors and other internal circuitry. It works fine on previous models. The big reason I suggest the Caldigit card over the rest is:
1) It is half the price with all the same features
2) It can be installed and removed by the customer. The Apple card can only be installed and removed by a certified Apple dealer.
Now, Raid 5 is good as it offers PROTECTION...where RAID 0 does not. If one drive dies, the RAID 5 still works. If the same happened to Raid 0, all info is lost...ALL. Raid 5 will lower the capacity of all the drives, as it uses one for this protection, where Raid 0 is larger. Give and take.
FYI...I cut DVCPRO HD and ProRes on internal drives...no raid. Firewire 800 drives are good for this format too. Raids are only needed for multiple streams of ProRes, and the uncompressed formats. And for protection.
Shane

CS4 drops support for databases?

I just got off a lengthy call with Dreamweaver tech support,
and they confirmed that there is no longer any support for database
connectivity using ASP.Net VB in the new CS4 version. The only
connectivity that is supported is through a Spry Dataset. The
technician said that this appears to be a security related issue
and that Adobe has no intentions of changing this.
Why would Adobe do this?
I have used Dreamweaver for many years, and this was one of
the strongest parts of the program, and the decision ends our
company’s use of any newer version of the product.

MCUlloa wrote:
> I just got off a lengthy call with Dreamweaver tech
support, and they confirmed
> that there is no longer any support for database
connectivity using ASP.Net VB
> in the new CS4 version. The only connectivity that is
supported is through a
> Spry Dataset. The technician said that this appears to
be a security related
> issue and that Adobe has no intentions of changing this.
>
> Why would Adobe do this?
>
> I have used Dreamweaver for many years, and this was one
of the strongest
> parts of the program, and the decision ends our
company?s use of any newer
> version of the product.
The dropping of support for ASP.NET was announced in August
2007, but
support for ASP, PHP and CF hasn't been dropped. The reason
for .NET to
be dropped isn't just security, its down to Adobe never being
able to
keep up with all the updates from Microsoft for .NET. They
just can't
compete with Microsoft's own products.
I am still on CS3, and don't have any plans to get CS4, as
the features
don't make a big enough difference for me, yet. So if you
need .NET
support, stick with CS3, but you will only be using getting
.NET v1.1 so
you will be far behind everyone else.
Dooza
Posting Guidelines
http://www.adobe.com/support/forums/guidelines.html
How To Ask Smart Questions
http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Dropping support for Internet Explorer 8, and Firefox 20.x or below

Starting April 30th, we will discontinue support for all Internet Explorer 8 versions and all Firefox 20 versions and below. In order to continue using Business Catalyst Admin user interface without problems, you and your clients need to upgrade to a more recent browser:
Download Internet Explorer
Download Safari
Download Chrome
Download Firefox

Thanks for your reply Shay.
We plan to officially support IE8 with the next patch release to JDeveloper 11g - currently planned for later this year.That matches what I wrote in my initial post in this forum thread about IE8 support.
We usually only certify browsers after they officially go production.That does not really answer my question (q1) in this forum thread.
It is more like, how can I assess that Oracle will support any successor(s) of IE8 or successor(s) of any currently supported browsers for ADF 11g applications in the future? How long will Oracle support "commonly used browsers" for an ADF 11g application I build today, so how long will I be able to use that application?
How do I answer such questions for ADF 11g applications that should be deployed on the internet (where, as some extranet environments, you typically have not that much (or no) control over which browsers your users use ... although some would like to argue with that, see forum thread "ADF Faces RC browser support and browser market share")?
(By the way, do you have any feedback for the forum thread "ADF 10g support for Internet Explorer 8"?)
regards
Jan

Adding drop support for JPanel in 1.4

Hi there.
I'm sorry for this naive question, but I just had to...
For implementing drop support in a JPanel can we use the new dnd features of 1.4 or do we have to do it using the "old style"?
I mean, do we have to implement the DropTargetListener interface and define it as a DropTarget or is there a simpler way?
Cheers,
/rp

Hi there.
I'm sorry for this naive question, but I just had to...
For implementing drop support in a JPanel can we use the new dnd features of 1.4 or do we have to do it using the "old style"?
I mean, do we have to implement the DropTargetListener interface and define it as a DropTarget or is there a simpler way?
Cheers,
/rp

When did Oracle drop support for this?

Hi
I have the 9.2.0.2 Windows installation of Oracle on a test PC here. On 9.2.0.2, the CREATE TABLESPACE statement fails when specifying the TEMPORARY clause. Instead I have to use CREATE TEMPORARY TABLESPACE. The difference of course is that the latter creates a locally managed temp ts while the former creates dictionary managed temp ts.
Does anyone know the exact version at which Oracle stopped support for CREATE TABLESPACE ... TEMPORARY - i.e. dictionary managed temporary tablespaces?
Thanks
Martin

Fredrik is correct. My system tablespace is locally managed. I tried his proposed tablespace creation and it did fail "ORA-12913: Cannot create dictionary managed tablespace". So there is the answer.
Thanks to both of you for the help.
Martin.

Creative silently trying to drop support for some X-FI products?

I intended to look for any updates on their support page but to my surprise the X-FI Platinum (yes, the one with hardware decoding of various 5. formats) was not listed anymore. Though I found it through: 'If your product is not listed above, please click here.' at the very bottom. So we got an official Windows 7 driver with this, and other cards, that increases shutdown time with up to 5 minutes for 9 months, and now this? I am close to being speechless.
So just to be clear here, I am not saying they are, I am saying what it starting to point towards. It doesn't inspire confidence or quality at all and on top of the last few years it's just too much. Sadly Creative seems to think they don't want customers that know how things work. We're too much trouble and not easy enough cashcows? But the only thing we want is are bug fixed and stable working drivers in operating system Creative has announced to support. Granted I understand that this may not be easy, but don't announce support for products you cannot get to work 00% your selfs.
Thank you for the efforts Creative, but it's fallen short and only almost working so far in Vista and W7. I don't see how anyone should buy your products with the quality (I've tested a few things more then just your sounds cards) you're aiming for if this is Creatives answer to it's consumers.

JCOnline wrote:
SandwichTime wrote:
JCOnline wrote:
Well said.
I'm sick and tired of Creative. No response - no new drivers - nothing but silence. Maybe it's time to get the media on this. Maybe that will force Creative to come with some sort of statement about their lack of support.
I can think of several news media that might find this situation very interesting!.
Unfortunately, I don't think even media attention can move Creative to do anything about anything except make more hollow promises.
Remember all the media attention surrounding the Daniel_k incident in March/April 2008 It woke Creative up for a little bit, they made a bunch of vague promises, and now they are back to sleep again.
Guess you're right but it seems like a much bigger story than the Daniel incident.
The Daniel_K incident wasn't solely about Creative stepping on a community driver modder, it was also about the years of neglect Creative had towards their sound card users. Those years of neglect had the effect of building a silent anger towards Creative amongst it's user base, we were all ready to blow, we just needed a spark. The letter from Creative to Daniel K was that spark.
Sort of like how WW started...

Has Apple completely dropped support for FCP 7 ?

My search of the Pro Software "support" already suggests the answer, but maybe I'm just too incredulous to believe it. OK, I get that they really like FCP X and want everyone to migrate to it, but man, have they even been reading their press?? So they are trying to force us to a very poor alpha release of the new world order, but what about the extensive community of users who've faithfully hung in with them through the development of the earlier versions?
Look, I really don't want to turn this into one of many rants about FCP x (lower case intended). I expect a lot of the problems we're reading about will eventually get fixed and when they do, I for one feel like I'll like it and will make the leap once they do.
What about all the demos, instructional videos, how-to advise and legacy community blog stuff for the substantial community who are waiting to see before jumping into a yet to be tested and proven new platform. If they wanted to bail on the pro community, they should have just admitted it and done so. I would have respected them for that. But this is just insulting...
Am I missing the FCP 7 Suite support or have I just encountered a big poke in the eye?

First, I guess I really did sound like a rant on FCP X - Sorry...
Second, I'm referring to the community discussions and application tutorials for FCS stuff to get through a basic use of a tool such as Motion, Color and to a much lesser extent, FCP 7. I'll check the link...
I only do rough cuts on bigger projects that I hand off to a real editor for finish out. I also do a lot of work for non-profits so where there is little budget available, they are stuck with me for cheap editing (lol)
thanks for your comments all, but Jason was most on target.
Regards All
Rod

Support for Post-Script 2

I know a very dumb Q. But still need to know the answer from the report gurus themselves. Does Report 6.0 support PostScript Level 2 o/p. All my efforts to produce L2 resulted in a L3 o/p.Is there any other config. changes to be made other than to uiprint.txt where you specify the desired o/p. My current uiprint.txt looks like this
info-ps:PostScript:3:Info-Print:ibm3160.ppd
An early reply would be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Satish
null

Originally Posted by KBOYLE
Things are improving! Especially in Support. We even have new TID's.
Jim has been a great resource. Issues are being addressed and resolved. There is even Developer involvement in the NOES SBE forum.
Now, if only we could engage the Product Management team...
Hi Todd,
It has been six months since this thread has been updated. In January, I noted improvements in Support but still saw little involvement from the Product Management team. I would like to provide another update.
NOWS SBE has yet another new Product Manager. This time, he and I have had a couple of discussions and I am convinced that he, and the whole NOWS SBE, team is committed to addressing the many issues and making major improvements to the product. I'm sure this was brought about, in no small part, to your behind-the-scene efforts. Thank you!
I know the team is working hard on a variety of issues. Many bugs have been identified and apparently resolved. I understand efforts are underway to improve product documentation. But as they say, perception is reality!
It has been almost six months since the last set of patches has been released. I do what I can to help users avoid issues but as far as the NOWS SBE Community is concerned, until the new patches are released... little has changed.
Once again, thanks for your help.

Has Pacman3 dropped support for the NoUpgrade Lines in pacman.conf?

I just upgraded to Pacman 3. When I upgraded I quickly saw some output on my sceen saying it was doing a one time "reset" and I believe it said I could delete the NoUpgrade lines in pacman.conf.
I noticed that pacman.conf.pacnew does not have any NoUpgrade lines.
Should I delete all the NoUpgrade lines from my pacman.conf file?
Is the NoUpgrade line no longer supported in pacman3?
If so, how can I protect some of my config files from being overwritten during upgrades?
Rob

They're still supported, there just aren't any by default anymore. They were redundant.
You can/should remove any that are listed in the "backup" list for the packages they come from (pacman -Qii package). Those are all handled as if they were in NoUpgrade anyway.

When will LabVIEW Drop Support for the NXT?

We currently use LabVIEW to program LEGO NXT kits in our engineering courses. However, LEGO is phasing out the NXT within the next year or two. Does anyone know the LabVIEW/NXT life cycle plan, i.e., when will LabVIEW no longer support the NXT platform?

Hi Joel777,
NI doesn't currently have a definitive roadmap for future NXT support in LabVIEW, but I recommend you check out the community page for updated modules. I would also recommend adding any feedback you have regarding future releases to this page in the comments section and periodically checking this page for support updates.
Rick C.

Macally drops support for Post-Op/iMedia FCP Keyboard on Intels

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for