MacBook Pro 15", performance, Aperture 1.1.x vs 1.5

Hello all,
thought I'd post some info about Aperture 1.5 on a MBP 15". I have seen many posts and ramblings about how the MBP 15" is somehow slow when using Aperture, especially compared to the 17" or other Intel machines.
My biggest gripes with Aperture 1.1.x have been, in order:
- It very quickly seems to force every other running application (and parts of the OS) to be paged out on disk, causing the system to be very, very slow even after quitting Aperture. Aperture itself also tended to get slower and slower the longer I used it, especially when using the fullscreen mode. Within 20 minutes of working with it it'd have slowed down to a crawl. And after quitting aperture, switching to - say - Safari would take upwards of half a minute, because things would have to be paged back into memory.
This is no longer a problem with 1.5. It's faster in general, and it STAYS THAT WAY! Yay!
- Rotating images, even ever so slightly, is very much slower than in iPhoto. No matter if I rotate a RAW or a JPG, no matter the size (within limits), and no matter if I rotate 5 degrees or 180 - iPhoto has always been a prime example of smoothness, even on old G3 and G4 computers (yes, I've made iPhoto 6 run on a G3, it's absolutely painless)!
This is still a problem, though it's become a lot better. What I cannot understand is why it should be that way -- why does it need to operate on the original file (I can't see any other explanation why it should be slower with RAW or large files) when rotating - before I've even released the mouse button?
Oh and another thing. It's useable on a MacBook now. Very much so. Thanks, Apple!
/Eirik
MacBook Pro 15", 2.0GHz, 100GB 7k2 RPM    

I have the same setup as you, with mainly 9 and 16MB
Nikon D2H and D200 RAW files, and would agree that
there is a marked improvement. Although, being
cautious I am only testing on a small 'copy' library
with 5000 images, before going full time 1.5.
I've got about ~30.000 images in my library. Took about 40 minutes to convert on the MacBook (not Pro), where the library resides on an external FW drive. Picture browsing etc. is markedly faster than before.
I allowed the preview generating process to run overnight. It's done now.
I am not looking forward to creating previews
for 300GB libraries, but should mean that I can stop
using Portfolio.
Enjoy. But it's not as hard as it sounds. And you can keep working while it generates previews (in the background).
PS: My performance "feeling" is from before previews were generated. Might get even better

Similar Messages

  • MacBook Pro poor performance in relation to NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT

    Hi All who may be having similar issues.
    I am now on my third replacement custom Macbook Pro 2.66GHz with 7200rpm hardrive and 4Gb of ram, and yes am so peeved that this has happened again. I am aware of the article in the 'Inquirer' about the 'bad bumps' of the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT in these machines and realise it is not all but from the various postings and refurbished MacBook Pro's... quite a volume!
    First off i also own an older powerPC imac 1.8GHz 2GB Ram and at my work use a 3.0GHz Mac Pro with 6Gb of Ram and a 2008 imac intel 2.4GHz with 4Gb of Ram. I am fully competent and primarily use for photographic programs such as capture one, photoshop, lightroom, Aperture and these new MacBook Pro modes has failed me in so many ways
    I have read many threads regarding the possible reasons for why these cards are failing or at fault, and am encountering an attitude from apple that sees this problem as unique to me. Obviously not as from when i google or go into the discussion rooms
    the issue?
    make sure you are on the higher performance graphics card.
    simple test.. take a screen grab( of anything in safari or even of the desktop) and press fn+F11 or however you configure your keypad to go to the desktop. you may notice nothing happens.. try again.. wait. you will see a delay and the commands follow when the computer catches up.
    if all my other computers i use can do the easiest of tasks why can't this? seems incredible to me!
    also after installing any of the above mentioned software and beginning processing raw files(in all the programs to make sure there was no software issue) the computer becomes very hot.. i get beach balling and regular crashes.. also the fact that my computers at work seem to work amazingly well with the above software versions. To add note, all machines have up to date apple software.
    In the first machine i had it got so bad the dock disappeared and spaces crashed..the track pad froze and that was it. it took forever to start up and shut down.. it appeared to work on the lower performance setting intially but over time became buggy and crashed on that side too!
    these last 2 models have behaved exactly the same... all the same custom configurations i have mentioned above.But i have recognised the problem straight off and asked apple for replacements.. i am now on the third and will call them tomorrow with the same issue. I just want a machine that works smoothly and reflects the price i have paid for it.
    Has anyone else experiences this? any support or advice would be deeply appreciated.. i can't keep getting dodgy Shanghi custom models!!

    I read your thread Nee Kun.. and thanks, yes that is the basics of my problem, but that is just a major signal that something is seriously wrong. The screen grab is the first test to see if a new MacBook Pro computer may have this underlying issue. what i found with my first 2 models was, this issue then developed into all the other issues i have described in my original post, so its not really the screen grab i am bothered about... however annoying it is.. but the fact that these machines over time on the higher performance graphics card become disfunctional and crash periodically say every 20 min of light photography retouching and processing then there is something that is fundamentally flawed in these over priced and under tested machines. i'm not a happy bunny.
    However, I have been in discussions with apple and they are listening to my issue and we are trying to resolved it, but if not... it will have to be some form of compensation as i simply cannot do any high end work on these machines that a 3yr old powerbook, 5 yr power PC imac and all all the new range of imacs and mac pro's i have access to can! it is utterly bewildering!
    hmmmm... will post an update as and when.

  • New MacBook Pro's for Aperture

    Apple just released their new MacBooks.
    A graphic on the Apple site claims the Core 2 Duo will be 28% faster with Aperture. The LED display is claimed to display "blacker blacks and whiter whites and many more colors in between" as well as being the "ideal vehicle for displaying high-resolution Photoshop images".
    The new graphics performance is said to be 57% faster than the original core-due based MacBook Pro.
    Sounds like the ultimate Aperture/Photo editing laptop!

    I'm very excited about these new models as well, particularly the LED backlighting. I'm upgrading from a 3-year-old PowerMac G4, 1.5Ghz, so I should see a performance boost almost no matter which one I pick. I wonder if LED backlighting saves on battery time?
    Anyhow, looking at my choices for 15" laptop it's basically 2.2Ghz vs. 2.4Ghz, 160GB vs. 120GB, and 128MB video RAM vs. 256MB video RAM. Everything else looks the same -- correct?
    Given that my primary use is photography (Photoshop CS3 and Aperture), my questions are:
    1. Is 2GB RAM enough? It seems to be on my G5 tower.
    2. Will I see any difference between the two video cards?
    If it's just texture RAM, probably not, but if there
    are more pipelines in the 256MB version or something,
    Aperture will likely be sensitive to it. I sure got
    bitten hard with my G5 tower's video card!
    3. Should I opt for the 7200RPM drive? Is it going to
    make a significant performance difference vs. the extra
    power drainage?
    4. The 0.2Ghz CPU difference seems completely unimportant,
    but if there's extra cache on the 2.4Ghz model or some
    other enhancement, it could make a real difference.
    Thanks much,
    ALF

  • Macbook Pro - horrible performance - what can I do???

    Macbook Pro 15"
    Late model 2010 (December)
    2.66 GHz Intel Core i7
    8GB 1067 MHz DDR3 RAM
    500GB HDD (437GB/37GB Mac HDD/Bootcamp)
    Hi,
    When I got my MBP in Dec 2010, it was very snappy running Snow Leopard. 
    My initial upgrade to Lion (Apple's version of MS Vista? LOL) had issues, I restored from Time Machine, but eventually got it installed.  Almost immediately, the performance drastically reduced.
    Eventually, I took it into Apple, they re-installed Lion from scratch (wiped the hard disk), and I did a partial restore from Time Machine.  There's no guarantee I didn't regress some system files from my Time Machine backup.
    The install of Mountain Lion was uneventful - the app store upgrade ran fine.
    I was also getting a number of kernel panics, which were eventually isolated to (I think?) the GPU.  Apple replaced the GPU under the Apple Care warrantee.
    So, ever since moving off the original operating system, my MBP has had horrid performance.  Some days worse than others, but lately very bad.
    However, the timing could be a coincidence - I have also installed a number of third party tools (as we all do), and my HDD has 12GB out of 437GB left.  At times it has had < 1GB before I copied files to an external USB drive.  I don't deny my MBP could be bloated.
    Sometimes when I close the laptop lid, then reopen it, the screen never recovers.  5 mins later the display is still black, and I have to cycle power.  Sometimes just tabbing to a new text input field within Safari can take 30 seconds to move to the next field.  Numerous other performance problems, I'm so sick of the spinning beach ball.
    So, with that as background, some questions:
    1) Any general advice on addressing poor performance under OS X 10.8.2?
    2) Are there any *good quality* tools I can use to fix poor performance?  I installed Mackeeper 2012 for about 10 minutes, before further web research convinced me to uninstall immediately.  But I do like the concept, if a reputable company puts out a similar product.  What about Clean My Mac???
    3) Are there any tools available to test my hardware?  I know Apple have them - that's how they detected the bad GPU.  I'd like to run a full diagnostic check of my hardware.
    (However, I also booted into Boot Camp.  Windows 7 was very snappy, with the same hardware available to OS X.  I suspect my problem is software related.  Performance of the Boot Camp images under Parallels 8 is abysmal.  Yes, I know a VM adds overhead, but Windows used to be just fine under Parallels.)
    4) Or should I just take it to the Genius Bar under my Apple Care coverage?  I've got 10 months left on the 3 year warrantee.
    Any other advice more than welcome.  Right now, I'm close to just wiping the disk and installing Windows 7 ;-).  At this point, it really is unworkable, the performance is that bad.  I really *want* to like my Mac and OS X, but lately I think "It Just Works" is just a bunch of marketing hype ;-). 
    Thanks,
    Scott

    Thanks for the quick reply...
    1) Can I reinstall Mountain Lion from the recovery partition?  I know I could with Lion; I assume the app store upgrade to Mountain Lion updates the recovery partition?
    2) How do I run a hardware diagnostics on my HDD?  Is there a utility that comes with Mountain Lion, or do I need to go to Apple?
    3) Are there known apps that cause problems?  I totally agree with your advice above - I should have thought of it lol - but it will be a PITA to implement.  I can post a list of my apps if that will help.  Note that the poor performance occurs even when few apps are actually active, and happens shortly after a restart.
    4)  How do I know what a TRUSTED app is?  For example, I've got Chrome, but I've heard it has ahem "issues" on the Mac.  But I don't know if that's the *cause* of the poor performance.
    (Oops...ignore question #2, I'll search for how to do this...)
    In short, if there is a way to shortcut these diagnostics, that would help.  But yeah, I can see that what you suggest will probably what I end up doing ;-/
    Thanks again,
    Scott

  • Did you MacBook Pro Retina performance improve significantly with Mavericks 10.9.5?

    My MacBook Pro Retina (Early 2013) is one of the unfortunate ones that suffered from extreme scroll lag and performance slowdowns.
    Beginning day one, I've had to employ workarounds such as using gfxCardStatus to force Discrete mode or to use a non-HiDPI resolution to reduce the symptoms.
    To my surprise, when I upgraded to Mavericks 10.9.5, nearly all my issues have been resolved. I'm back using high resolution modes without a single bit of slowdown. Scroll lag is also minimal or entirely gone. The last issue I have is with the Applications dock folder and the 'folder' viewing mode still producing severe lag, but I can live with that as I use Alfred to launch my applications anyway.
    Has anybody seen noticeable improvements like me? I queried others on MacRumors, but didn't get much feedback.

    Adobe Application Manager was the culprit. For some reason with the XI install, Adobe Application Manager would not launch. I was able to resolve by deleting all
    ~/Library/Preferences/ associated with older versions of Adobe and by cleaning out ~/Library/Application Support/Adobe/Acrobat

  • IMac vs Macbook pro 13 inch + aperture use

    Hello everyone,
    First thanks in advance for replying!
    My situation:
    Have an old iMac 17inch core 2 duo 2GHz with 1GB of RAM.
    I don't have a laptop but i would like to have the portability of one, but it itsn't a necessty for the work i wanna do. (i can find a way around it all if need be)
    What i do on my mac:
    Most of the time i use my mac for web browsing, watching youtube video's, movies, TV shows, and social media, and as a hobby i'm into photography.
    Currently i'm using iphoto to edit my photo's and while i find it good and practical i want to do a little more than what iphoto can do. I want to start using aperture for editing. Now remember it's as a hobby it's nothing hardcore just basic editing (black and white, saturation, adjusting colour and stuff).
    So i'm going to buy myself a new Mac because this one is getting real slow when editing, even in iphoto. (takes like 5minuts to save the edited photo is way to long) Now i know i can upgrade the RAM for not much money but i want a new machine.
    I'm at a dillema. Should i get the macbook pro 13 inch i7 or the imac 21,5 inch same price point?
    If i get the macbook pro I would be using it somewhat like this: 90% desktop with external monitor 24inch and 10% portable.
    (Like when i'm going on vacantion to edit some photo's or use it as storage for them, sitting downstares not behind my desk, take it a friends house. But all this i can miss if need be)
    Now for the questions
    Is the macbook pro 13 inch going to cut it as a desktop computer + monitor while using aperture as the heaviest program ever and multi tasking?
    Do i need the graphics card and quad core of the imac for aperture?
    Thanks

    I wouldn't even consider a laptop. I upgraded from an iMac 17 to a 24 over three years ago and now it seems small c/w the 27.
    I use my old 17 when I go on the road as it goes into a padded bag along with the keyboard and mouse and only takes minutes to set up.
    You'll get far more bang for your buck with a desktop and it will last you a lot longer. MacBooks are famous for hard drive failure and I wouldn't bother with one until they are fitted with flash drives as standard.
    Me, I'm waiting for a 17 inch Airbook to appear.

  • 13" MacBook Air vs 13" MacBook Pro Retina for aperture while traveling

    Okay team, I think that I now the answer to this but here goes.
    I'm looking for a light MacBook to take with me to download my photos into Aperture and do sorting, tagging, maybe light editing for posting online. We are traveling to Europe for 24 days this summer, and I will be backing up pictures for 4 people.
    I had thought about a used Air, but the recent price drop of the 13" Retina MacBooks, military exchange has dropped the price on last years 13" Retina down to $1500 with the 256gb SSD, and no taxes. It's about the same as the 13" MacBook Air with the price drop.
    Is this a no brainer? I haven't used a smaller MacBook like this before, my old one was a 17" and my wife has a 2011 15" MacBook Pro.
    Any opinions? Thanks, Mark

    The graphic card is the same in the 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display and the MacBook Air, and the processor is similar, so you won't experience any big difference between them, but the 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display will be faster. Apart from that, the 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display comes with 8 GB of memory. Note that the memory in both MacBooks come soldered, so buy your Mac with the memory you are going to need

  • MacBook Pro Slow Performance, Difficulty Multitasking

    Hello, everyone.  Thanks in advance for any help.
    I have a mid-2012 Intel MacBook Pro that is very important to me.  Typically, I'll have a couple of Safari windows, Mail, Evernote, Excel, Word, Calendar, Contacts, and Acrobat running at the same time on 3-4 desktops.  This has been typical of my usage since I bought the computer. 
    For the last few months, I've noticed that it is having difficulty switching between these tasks.  The gestures to switch the task on the display work fine, but I often get the working ball icon for a significant time before I can continue work in the new application.  This sometimes lasts up to a minute, but is usually 10 seconds or so.  I haven't noticed that a particular application causes this more than any other, and since I first noticed it, I've installed 2 or 3 different OS versions.  I also ran an AHT with no results. 
    Anyway, since I can't point to anything other than my perception of slower performance, I figured I'd post my EtreCheck results to fish for suggestions.  Does anything below look out of whack?  Any suggestions for changes to improve performance?
    Thanks,
    Jake
    Problem description:
    Slow performance, difficulty switching tasks.
    EtreCheck version: 2.0.6 (91)
    Report generated October 28, 2014 at 8:41:46 AM PDT
    Hardware Information: ℹ️
      MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012) (Verified)
      MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro9,2
      1 2.9 GHz Intel Core i7 CPU: 2-core
      8 GB RAM Upgradeable
      BANK 0/DIMM0
      4 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
      BANK 1/DIMM0
      4 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
      Bluetooth: Good - Handoff/Airdrop2 supported
      Wireless:  en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
    Video Information: ℹ️
      Intel HD Graphics 4000 -
      HZ281H 1920 x 1200 @ 60 Hz
    System Software: ℹ️
      OS X 10.9.5 (13F34) - Uptime: 0:12:3
    Disk Information: ℹ️
      APPLE HDD TOSHIBA MK7559GSXF disk0 : (750.16 GB)
      S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
      EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
      Macintosh HD (disk0s2) /  [Startup]: 749.30 GB (582.27 GB free)
      Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>  [Recovery]: 650 MB
      HL-DT-ST DVDRW  GS31N 
    USB Information: ℹ️
      Apple Inc. FaceTime HD Camera (Built-in)
      Logitech USB Receiver
      Canon CanoScan
      Lexmark Lexmark MS410d
      Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
      Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
      Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
      Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
    Thunderbolt Information: ℹ️
      Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
    Gatekeeper: ℹ️
      Mac App Store and identified developers
    Kernel Extensions: ℹ️
      /Applications/Parallels Access.app
      [loaded] com.parallels.virtualsound (1.0.27 27 - SDK 10.6) Support
      /Applications/Parallels Desktop.app
      [not loaded] com.parallels.kext.hypervisor (10.1.0 28600 - SDK 10.7) Support
      [not loaded] com.parallels.kext.netbridge (10.1.0 28600 - SDK 10.7) Support
      [not loaded] com.parallels.kext.usbconnect (10.1.0 28600 - SDK 10.7) Support
      [not loaded] com.parallels.kext.vnic (10.1.0 28600 - SDK 10.7) Support
    Launch Agents: ℹ️
      [not loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist Support
      [loaded] com.oracle.java.Java-Updater.plist Support
      [running] com.parallels.mobile.prl_deskctl_agent.launchagent.plist Support
    Launch Daemons: ℹ️
      [loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist Support
      [loaded] com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist Support
      [loaded] com.oracle.java.Helper-Tool.plist Support
      [running] com.parallels.mobile.dispatcher.launchdaemon.plist Support
      [loaded] com.parallels.mobile.kextloader.launchdaemon.plist Support
    User Launch Agents: ℹ️
      [loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist Support
      [invalid?] com.citrixonline.GoToMeeting.G2MUpdate.plist Support
      [loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist Support
      [running] com.parallels.mobile.startgui.launchagent.plist Support
      [loaded] com.valvesoftware.steamclean.plist Support
    User Login Items: ℹ️
      iTunesHelper Application (/Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunesHelper.app)
      TileWindowsLite Application (/Users/[redacted]/.Trash/TileWindowsLite.app)
      AdobeResourceSynchronizer UNKNOWNHidden (missing value)
      Safari Application (/Applications/Safari.app)
      Mail Application (/Applications/Mail.app)
      Evernote Application (/Applications/Evernote.app)
      Flexiglass ApplicationHidden (/Applications/Flexiglass.app)
      EvernoteHelper Application (/Applications/Evernote.app/Contents/Library/LoginItems/EvernoteHelper.app)
    Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
      AdobeAAMDetect: Version: AdobeAAMDetect 1.0.0.0 - SDK 10.6 Support
      FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 15.0.0.189 - SDK 10.6 Support
      Default Browser: Version: 537 - SDK 10.9
      Flash Player: Version: 15.0.0.189 - SDK 10.6 Support
      QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
      CitrixICAClientPlugIn: Version: 11.4.3 - SDK 10.0 Support
      SharePointBrowserPlugin: Version: 14.4.4 - SDK 10.6 Support
      Unity Web Player: Version: UnityPlayer version 4.5.1f3 - SDK 10.6 Support
      Silverlight: Version: 5.1.30514.0 - SDK 10.6 Support
      DirectorShockwave: Version: 12.1.2r152 - SDK 10.6 Support
      JavaAppletPlugin: Version: Java 7 Update 60 Check version
    User Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
      CitrixOnlineWebDeploymentPlugin: Version: 1.0.105 Support
      WebEx64: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.6 Support
      Google Earth Web Plug-in: Version: 7.1 Support
    Safari Extensions: ℹ️
      ClickToFlash (Disabled)
      OpenIE
    3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
      Flash Player  Support
      Java  Support
    Time Machine: ℹ️
      Time Machine not configured!
    Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
          11% Microsoft Excel
          5% WindowServer
          4% com.apple.WebKit.Plugin.64
          3% mds
          1% Flexiglass
    Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
      180 MB com.apple.WebKit.Plugin.64
      165 MB com.apple.WebKit.WebContent
      155 MB Evernote
      146 MB Safari
      129 MB Mail
    Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
      4.01 GB Free RAM
      3.07 GB Active RAM
      609 MB Inactive RAM
      895 MB Wired RAM
      557 MB Page-ins
      0 B Page-outs

    Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
    ☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
    ☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
    ☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
    The title of the Console window should be All Messages. If it isn't, select
              SYSTEM LOG QUERIES ▹ All Messages
    from the log list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
              View ▹ Show Log List
    from the menu bar at the top of the screen. Click the Clear Display icon in the toolbar. Then take one of the actions that you're having trouble with. Select any messages that appear in the Console window. Copy them to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C. Paste into a reply to this message by pressing command-V.
    The log contains a vast amount of information, almost all of which is irrelevant to solving any particular problem. When posting a log extract, be selective. A few dozen lines are almost always more than enough.
    Please don't indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
    Please don't post screenshots of log messages—post the text.
    Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting.

  • Comparing Macbook Pro's Performance to Imac

    Apologies if this is asked all the time. Originally, I was on the market for a video/audio editing computer. I was looking at the 20 inch Imac. I was also planning to upgrade the video ram, so I could play a few games like Diablo, WoW, and Doom 3.
    However, especially with audio recording, portability would be a huge plus. And even that, not only just audio recording, but everything involving a computer. Portability would really be great.
    I am just wondering how you would compare the overall perforamnce of a Macbook Pro (specifically the lower model or the middle model) to the 20 inch imac. The Macbook Pro is significantly more expensive, and if its not much better than the Macbook, maybe i should save myself a ton of money and get that.
    Lastly, are there any rumors on when it will be upgraded? I mean, info on when the new Macbook Pro's would come out? I have seen these for a while, and it seems like a new one would be coming out.
    Lastly, another thing that scares me in this purchase is the number of problems people seem to have with their macbook pro's.
    Thanks for the help guys.

    I really don't know if the iMac is faster than an MBP given that both have a similar configuration and processor speed. However, you can visit www.barefeats.com and take a look at the various benchmarks they do comparing hardware.
    As for stuff posted in the Discussions keep in mind that 99 percent of posts are from users with a problem. For every one problem posted there are nine users who have no problems. What you see here is a highly skewed sampling that is not truly representative of the population of all users. I've seen users report that their Intel Mac is slower than their PowerPC Mac. In reality that's completely false. Often these comparisons are based on using old PowerPC apps that have to run in Rosetta on an Intel Mac. Rosetta emulation is about 30 percent slower than running the same application on a PowerPC. In other words they are comparing apples and oranges. I benchmarked my MBP against several PowerPC models (1 Ghz TiPB, 1.33 Ghz Quicksilver G4, and 1.5 Ghz AlPB.) The MBP was three to four times faster on average based on four different benchmarking applications.
    I can't tell you when new MBPs or iMacs will appear. Only Apple knows that. Given the abounding rumors I suppose you could guess that new models may appear anytime between now and first quarter 2007, but that's pure speculation. And, Leopard (10.5) is also expected to be released in the early part of 2007.
    As for buying now versus waiting. Technology changes so quickly that most computer makers bring out new models within months of releasing older models. If you keep waiting you will probably never buy anything. If you buy something today I have no doubt that a newer, better, faster, model will appear before your warranty expires. Computers and cars are not too different in this regard except that it takes a year before a newer car appears.
    In any event you have to make your own decision.

  • Snow Leopard and Macbook Pro Battery Performance

    I recently installed Snow Leopard on my 2007 Macbook Pro and now, the battery is completely shot.
    It tells me that I need to service the battery and if it is not plugged into the mains, it loses power almost immediately.
    Is this a common problem or am I a one off?
    Really need to get this sorted.

    Have you been calibrating your battery per your user manual schedule?
    Apple/About This Mac/More Info/Hardware/Power/Battery Information - copy and paste the information here. _*Do not include any serial numbers.*_
    my Apple Care has expired it's on my nickel....
    Not necessarily. You can always call Apple Customer Relations (800) 767-2775.

  • New MacBook Pro FCPX performance

    Hi all :)
    Just wondering if anyone has had any experience with any of the new Retina MacBook Pros and FCPX? They have the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M graphics cards with 1GB of VRAM ...
    Many thanks,
    David :)

    Hi Tom,
    This is what I'm dealing with at the moment... The following 2 minutes has taken the best part of an hour to render!!
    That clip at the top is an optimised 1080p 50p clip which I then colour-corrected (hence why it needs re-rendering), the second line is 4 separate JPEG images (~500k each) with cross dissolves in between, and a static background JPEG (~1 MB) at the bottom. The video image is a very small insert at the top right of the frame, with the 4 JPEG images displaying like a slideshow at the bottom left of the frame.
    The media is on an external FW800 7200rpm 1TB drive (80% free space), the laptop has 8GB of RAM (and ~4GB free during rendering), there are no other programs open, there is ~25% free disk space on computer hard drive (7200rpm 500GB), and the processor sits around 100% during rendering ...
    Any idea why this would be taking so devastatingly long to render?
    Many thanks,
    David

  • MacBook Pro Airport Performance

    As discussed in two threads on the iMac Core Duo forum, the Airport implementation in the iMac seems to be hurting. Apple knows about this and there is a P1 level bug report filed. This means that it must be fixed before the next release.
    The other threads are
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=339752&tstart=0
    and
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=338281&tstart=25
    There may be more than one problem, but the one described results in 3 easy to detect symptoms
    1) download rates are about 57% of what one would expect
    2) "ping" shows 6 good pings followed by 4 bad ones, then repeats
    3) the network graph in Activity Monitor shows a "sawtooth" response when transferring large files. The sawthooth has a 10 second period (which cooresponds to the ping results)
    Some more data can be found at
    http://www.girr.org/macstuff/networkspeed.html
    The purpose of the NEW thread on the old subject is to strip off the chaff of the long old threads and pose a simple question
    "Does your iMac Core Duo behave this way?"
    Some folks say that their systems are working fine, others have serious troubles. If some work fine, then it isn't software. There may be a batch of "bad" ones out there (of which I apparantly have one). If the vote comes back mixed, it is probabably a hardware issue that doesn't impact every piece of hardware. If the vote is consistent, then it could be either hardware or softare.
    I've asked the MacBook Pro folks to join in so please indicate your hardware as well and ALSO reply to this thread:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=380801&tstart=0
    BTW, I've fired up an AXBS as a WDS remote and wired it to the iMac and now all is well
    PING 10.0.1.1 (10.0.1.1): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.331 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.407 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.352 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1.377 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1.363 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1.386 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1.365 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1.375 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1.355 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1.357 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=1.360 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=1.409 ms
    - gws

    Mine works fine, and I actually am getting slightly BETTER throughput. No packetloss (which is likely the cause of your throughput issues).
    I'm using a Linksys WRT54G with the OpenWRT firmware and my MBP.

  • WOW!!!!  Added 1GB ram to Macbook Pro C2D - Now Aperture Flies!!!!!

    I now have 2GB or ram in my 2.16Ghz C2D - - Aperture is a lot faster - it's actually a night and day difference on my setup!!! Yay for dual-channel!!!

    I wouldn't even consider a laptop. I upgraded from an iMac 17 to a 24 over three years ago and now it seems small c/w the 27.
    I use my old 17 when I go on the road as it goes into a padded bag along with the keyboard and mouse and only takes minutes to set up.
    You'll get far more bang for your buck with a desktop and it will last you a lot longer. MacBooks are famous for hard drive failure and I wouldn't bother with one until they are fitted with flash drives as standard.
    Me, I'm waiting for a 17 inch Airbook to appear.

  • Macbook Pro 17" performance

    Anyone got performance feedback for a MBPro 17" fully RAM'd?
    Im thinking of upgrading and would appreciate a full user report...from a working pro if possible...(photographer that is)..lol

    Thanks Denny, Mr Lee and Allen.
    I have a big assignment in July so it will be tough to tough it out but I can see I SHOULD hold out.
    Maybe they will tweak the screen resolution as well...from what I read, a lot of pro's need the extra pixel space(video pro's) Your point about going over +2 on the RAM option seems to be valid as well from all the feedback I read. Another HD option is unlikely I imagine but would be GREAT! as I take an external HD with me everywhere.
    From reading ALL the posts in this forum its not hard to tell what most people want for a 'pro' system...(thats you apple techs)
    I also would hope Apple should now lash out and make an absolute world beater fully spec'd model option, with all the bucks they make on music..even if their accountants say they will not sell many.
    I will never get a desktop unit as I can only afford one unit/setup and as I am mainly a location and destination photographer I need maximum leverage on the road. Also I have realised that post production is now SOoooo much a big part of modern photography, you really need to get a start on a job before you come back to base and do as much as possible on the road..even if you are exhausted. ( oh for the old days when you just put dots on trannies and sent them off)
    Great to hear that the current model is obviously good enough as well.
    Cheers to all
    G5 iMac & G4 ti powerbook Igb RAM   Mac OS X (10.4.6)   20'cinema display

  • After migrating from old macbook pro to new, aperture is not opening many photo images onboard and on external hard drive

    Is my question out there?
    It seems the longer I have Aperture open more and more images become unavailable. There's a dotted line around a blank thumbnail and clicking it may result in prolonged static "loading" symbol and ultimately, if anything else, a message that the file type (which is .jpg, nothing exotic) is not supported. These images are on an external iomega terabyte hard drive. It gets worse. If I go straight to the iomega drive where the images are all listed, selecting one brings up a symbol instead of a thumbnail and double-clicking brings the message that I "do not have permission" to open this file.

    No, that shouldn't have mattered necessarily ss long as you moved the folders into the correct spots.
    You could start over by throwing all the folders you just moved in back out (could park them in a folder on your desktop). Then, if you want to start over completely, and - important - have the following file on your external - go to Users -> Library -> Preferences: com.apple.Mail.plist. This file contains all your account settings.
    Copy that file over to your new Mac.
    Throw out that same file on your new Mac (Mail will now think it has never been launched before).
    Move the old .plist file into the same spot.
    Move your Mail folders into place (and replace any newer folders there, so you will have exactly the same folder setup as you did in the old one).
    Launch Mail (keep fingers crossed - it should work!)

Maybe you are looking for