Made condition not work in VL10G background

Hi, Experts.
My customer required that
when sales orders combine to a delivery by using VL10G,
they want to use header text to combination condition.
So I made the routine(VOFM) and added to our delivery type(VTLA).
In VL01 , condition works well.
In VL10G "dialog" , well too.
But VL10G "background" , it did'nt work.
I set the break point to the routine, it didn't stop.
Please tell me what to do.
Best regards.
and sorry to my English skill is poor...

Call transactions with bdc tables in Sales Orders execute the user exit code! I've never seen user exit code excluded, unless by program code. What do you mean by "stop" in background. Of course, you can't make it stop there in background.
Post relevant code and we'll see what we can tell you. What does the code do?

Similar Messages

Function module is not working properly in background

Hi all,
i have used one Function module 'PRICING' in user exit SAPMV45A to calculate pricing for sales order.
i am using BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE to change the sales order pricing.
        when i run the program in foreground, all condition records for pricing is updated correctly. but it is not updating
correctly when i run the program in background.
   Please tell me wheather 'PRICING' or 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE' function module is not working properly in background ?
   or any other reason?
Thanks
babu

Hi Pabitra,
Can you provide some more information as to the type of error you are getting? Or can you check the log entries and give some more information so that it would be possible to provide a solution.
And, try to put questions in proper Forum for quick and prompt reply.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Samantak.

OR condition not working correctly in SQL

I am adding the folling condition to a sql statement and
AND (status_code IS NULL or status_code <> 'T'
or (status_code IN ('A','B','C','D') and TRIM(order_type) NOT LIKE '%9999')
or (status_code IN ('A','B','C','D') and order_type IS NOT NULL)
or (status_code NOT IN ('A','B','C','D')))
but the or condition work...
if i change it too
AND ( (status_code IN ('A','B','C','D') and order_type IS NOT NULL) )
then this portion of the OR condition work but when I use the OR condition something weird is happening that the condition not working... and i dont see a record that meets that condition...

Hi,
It's not the "trim" that implies "not null", but rather the fact that:
- "not like" operator works only on non-null values and
- "not like" operator disregards null values.
Consider this:
test@ORA92>
test@ORA92>
test@ORA92> l
1 with x as (
2 select null as y from dual union all
3 select 'a9999' from dual union all
4 select 'bxx' from dual
5 )
6 select * from x
7* where y not like '%9999'
test@ORA92>
test@ORA92> /
Y
bxx
1 row selected.
test@ORA92>
test@ORA92>Here, trim function was not used, but still the first row (that had null for y) was not returned. That's because Oracle disregarded the first row for comparison and out of the next two rows, it returned the third row because it satisfied the condition.
As for your query, do the following conditions hold true:
1. if status_code is null - show the row regardless of order_type
2. if status_code <> 'T' - show the row regardless of order_type
3. if status_code in (a,b,c,d) and order_type is not null and order_type ends with something other than 9999 - show the row
4. if status_code in (a,b,c,d) and order_type is null - do not show the row
5. if status_code in (a,b,c,d) and order_type is not null and it ends with 9999 - do not show the row
6. if status_code is anything other than (a,b,c,d) - do not show the rowpratz

In Photoshop CS6 Hue Saturation does not work with forground/background Jitter set at 100 percent no change in color is observed. Help

In Photoshop CS6 Hue Saturation does not work with forground/background Jitter set at 100 percent no change in color is observed. I have Added a screen Shot of the Brush settings and a demonstration of what the brush produces.
I also notice That when I make a pattern of a single color, when I fill a selection with the pattern I get a rainbow of different colors.
I am running a 64 bit version of Photoshop from the CS6 Masters Collection
I am on a PC with a Intel i7 1366 4 physical cores and 8 threads, 24 Gig of DDR memory, A Crucial 512 Gig SSD and a NVIDIA GTX 570 with 2 Gig of memory.
The document size is 2100 by 1500 Pixels at 300 PPI only two layers

In Photoshop CS6 Hue Saturation does not work with forground/background Jitter set at 100 percent no change in color is observed. I have Added a screen Shot of the Brush settings and a demonstration of what the brush produces.
I also notice That when I make a pattern of a single color, when I fill a selection with the pattern I get a rainbow of different colors.
I am running a 64 bit version of Photoshop from the CS6 Masters Collection
I am on a PC with a Intel i7 1366 4 physical cores and 8 threads, 24 Gig of DDR memory, A Crucial 512 Gig SSD and a NVIDIA GTX 570 with 2 Gig of memory.
The document size is 2100 by 1500 Pixels at 300 PPI only two layers

IF-condition not working in sap script??????

hi,
 i am trying to chk one condition in sap script using if statement....but it is not working at all.
statement i am writing is :-
/: IF &IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT& <> 0
p7 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,SAD,, 4.00 &IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT&
/: ENDIF
value for IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT is coming as it is shown while debuging .
eventhen control is going inside if statement independent from the value of IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT
how to use if statement properly....
regards
Deepak

Hi,
Declare a dummy variable of type IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT and then use that variable in sapscript..
Ex..
Print program
DATA: V_DUMMY LIKE IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT.
Sap script
/: IF &IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT& <> &V_DUMMY&
p7 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,SAD,, 4.00 &IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT&
/: ENDIF
Thanks,
Naren

Custom Pricing Conditions not working for a PO in SRM

Hi Experts,
We are on SRM 5.0, ECC 6.0 , Extended Classic Scenario.
We configured the pricing conditions in SRM . We defined the our custom pricing condition types as below
Condition type      --- Condition Class       --- Calculation Type
Frieght(%)            ---       Prices                ---      Percentage
Frieght Value       ---        Prices                --- Fixed Amount
We also defined the Calculation Schema.
But when we try to define the pricing conditions in SRM during PO creation\change , the standard pricing condition types work but when we input the above defined custom pricing condition type, the value entered gets cleared. Pricing Overview is not calculating the values of the custom Pricing condition types.
Please assist as where i have gone wrong. Do I need to run any standard report for pricing or do i have to implement any BADI.
Thanks,
Addy.

Hi Sanjeev,
I have run SM52 and VMC is active with 4 VM's .
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Addy.
Edited by: Addy1209 on Nov 18, 2010 4:28 PM

Youtube Autoplay not working in the background!

Why isn't autoplay of youtube videos not running in the background of Safari? It works fine in Firefox or Chrome, but in Safari, everytime a video is done, I have to make the youtube tab active for it to start playing the next video in the playlist. I'm pretty sure this is a bug in Safari and has not been fixed for a long long time.. Is there a way to get this working? Any extensions? Please help.

Hi, I have encountered the same problem when the youtube page is running on a background tab in safari. However, I find a alternative way to deal with this bug. I just draw that youtube tab out of safari to make it running in a seperate safari window without any other tabs in this window. In this way, it can autoplay the next video when it running background.
Hope this also works for you.

Condition not working

Hi all the is code i have used
DECLARE
     CURRENTRECORD NUMBER;
BEGIN
DECLARE
               CURRENT_DISCOUNT NUMBER;
               CURRENT_REASON VARCHAR2(100);
BEGIN
CURRENT_DISCOUNT:=:XXSY_DISCOUNT_MANAGER_V.DISCOUNT_RATE;
               CURRENT_REASON:=:XXSY_DISCOUNT_MANAGER_V.DISCOUNT_REASON;
               CURRENTRECORD :=:SYSTEM.CURSOR_RECORD;
               IF :XXSY_DISCOUNT_MANAGER_V.DISCOUNT = 'Y' THEN
               FIRST_RECORD;
               WHILE TRUE LOOP
          :XXSY_DISCOUNT_MANAGER_V.DISCOUNT_RATE:= CURRENT_DISCOUNT;
          :XXSY_DISCOUNT_MANAGER_V.DISCOUNT_REASON:= CURRENT_REASON;
               IF :System.Last_Record = 'TRUE' THEN
          :XXSY_DISCOUNT_MANAGER_V.DISCOUNT_RATE:=CURRENT_DISCOUNT;
          :XXSY_DISCOUNT_MANAGER_V.DISCOUNT_REASON:=CURRENT_REASON;
EXIT;
ELSE
     NEXT_RECORD;
END IF;
END LOOP;
END IF;
     END;
END;
it is not working properly,for record to record values is changing.for 1st record it is ok ,2nd record itis dispalying 1st record like that..
plss help me in this condition
Rgards
Siva

DECLARE
CURRENTRECORD NUMBER;
CURRENT_DISCOUNT NUMBER;
CURRENT_REASON VARCHAR2(100);
BEGIN
CURRENT_DISCOUNT:=:XXSY_DISCOUNT_MANAGER_V.DISCOUNT_RATE;
CURRENT_REASON:=:XXSY_DISCOUNT_MANAGER_V.DISCOUNT_REASON;
CURRENTRECORD :=:SYSTEM.CURSOR_RECORD;
IF :XXSY_DISCOUNT_MANAGER_V.DISCOUNT = 'Y' THEN
FIRST_RECORD;
LOOP
:XXSY_DISCOUNT_MANAGER_V.DISCOUNT_RATE:= CURRENT_DISCOUNT;
:XXSY_DISCOUNT_MANAGER_V.DISCOUNT_REASON:= CURRENT_REASON;
EXIT WHEN :SYSTEM.LAST_RECORD='TRUE';
NEXT_RECORD;
END LOOP;
END IF;
END;
Is the condition ":XXSY_DISCOUNT_MANAGER_V.DISCOUNT " true for more than 1 record....??????
Is there any error....?????
Are there displayed in your block more than one record...?????
Transform the above code and execute it in sql plus..... as db procedure..... Are the results as expected....?????
Greetings,
Simon

** XPath condition not work well in Receiver Determination.

Hi,
My scenario is having 3 receivers. I have 'Student' is the data type. I use the same data type for Source & Target Message Types. Requirement is I have to send
1) only records which are having SCOURSE = 'BE' to receiver 1
2) only records which are having SCOURSE = 'MCA' to receiver 2
3) only records which are having SCOURSE = 'MBA' to receiver 3
My Input.xml file contains the following records.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:THIRD_MT_OB xmlns:ns0="http://ganesh_third">
 <STUDENT_INFO>
 <ST_ID>10020</ST_ID>
 <SNAME>Raja</SNAME>
 <SCOURSE>BE</SCOURSE>
 <SFEES>3000</SFEES>
 <SMARKS>1200</SMARKS>
 </STUDENT_INFO>
 <STUDENT_INFO>
 <ST_ID>10021</ST_ID>
 <SNAME>Ram</SNAME>
 <SCOURSE>MCA</SCOURSE>
 <SFEES>3000</SFEES>
 <SMARKS>1200</SMARKS>
 </STUDENT_INFO>
 <STUDENT_INFO>
 <ST_ID>10022</ST_ID>
 <SNAME>Ram</SNAME>
 <SCOURSE>MBA</SCOURSE>
 <SFEES>3000</SFEES>
 <SMARKS>1200</SMARKS>
 </STUDENT_INFO>
</ns0:THIRD_MT_OB>
I set the Xpath condition in the Receiver Determination Step and add the 3 receivers for against the conditions.
Our problem is, If we send the single record in the input file, the corresponding receiver is selected correctly and we get the output file for that receiver. But, if we send the all combination of records (MCA,BE,MBA) 3 receivers are selected and the 3 output files we get. But, the three files are having the all records (MCA,BE,MBA). Instead, we want the first file should only have MCA record, the 2nd file should only have BE record and finally the 3rd file should only have MBA record. That means each receiver should receive only one record for the above input.
Friends, I though it will work for the 'XPath Expression' against receivers in the Receiver Determination Step. But, it didn't work. (Records are not split up)
How do achieve this, friends?
Could you kindly help me to solve this problem.
Kind Regards,
Jeg P.

If you are trying to split you input msg and send it to 3 different receivers using conditional receiver determination then it will not work. Once a condition is meet in the receiver determination then the entire msg is forwarded to the corresponding receiver, that is why when you have a single row in your input file which results in a single msg in XI the conditional receiver works. Now when you have multiple rows in your input file still only one msg is being created in XI for all the rows currently so all the conditions are being meet and the msg is forwarded to all the receivers.
If you are using FCC in the sender side then use the "recordset per msg" parameter to consider each row of your input file as a separate msg in XI and the rest will automatically fall in place.
Cheer's

Receiver Determination-Condition not working

Hi all,
It is simple iDoc to File scenario. I have two receivers based on a condition in the receiver determination. I am getting all data into both receivers without executing the condition.
Below is the condition. Any idea why this is not being executed? Thanks for your help.
(/ZGENERIC_OUTBOUND01/IDOC/Z1GENERIC_SDATA/SDATA = '1C')
(/ZGENERIC_OUTBOUND01/IDOC/Z1GENERIC_SDATA/SDATA = '1B')

> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
> - <ZGENERIC_OUTBOUND01>
> - <IDOC BEGIN="1">
> - <EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="1">
> <TABNAM>EDI_DC40</TABNAM>
> ......
> ......
> </EDI_DC40>
> - <Z1GENERIC_SDATA SEGMENT="1">
> <SDATA>1C</SDATA>
> </Z1GENERIC_SDATA>
> - <Z1GENERIC_SDATA SEGMENT="1">
> <SDATA>1C</SDATA>
> </Z1GENERIC_SDATA>
> - <Z1GENERIC_SDATA SEGMENT="1">
> <SDATA>1B</SDATA>
> </Z1GENERIC_SDATA>
> </IDOC>
> </ZGENERIC_OUTBOUND01>
You cannot have both the conditions in same IDOC at the same time. Like here in the above example you have 1C & 1B both, so in this situation it will not work.
Just for testing either remove 1C or 1B and then test. I am sure it will work.
You cannot send the same payload at the same time based on two different conditions to 2 different receivers except you put 'OR' in your conditon for 1C & 1B. But in this situation message will go to both of the receivers which you don't want here.
Regards,
Sarvesh

"If" condition not working

Hi all,
Here i want to put condition like when BELRT field of BKPF table get 'RE' type data this time condition is fire and program will termineted. for this i put code like below.
SELECT * FROM BKPF INTO TABLE IT_BKPF WHERE BELNR IN P_DOCNO          " DOCUMENT NO.
                                        AND   GJAHR IN P_FYEAR.         " FISCAL YEAR.
    if it_bkpf-blart = 'RE'.
      MESSAGE 'Please Enter Correct Doc.No and Financial Year' TYPE 'I'.
      SUBMIT ZFI_MM_DEBIT_VENDOR1 VIA SELECTION-SCREEN AND RETURN.
      LEAVE PROGRAM.
    endif.
But it will not working. So please help me out..
Thanks in Advance.
keyur chauhan
Code Formatted by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Jan 4, 2010 5:28 PM

please correct you code
SELECT * FROM BKPF
INTO TABLE IT_BKPF
WHERE BELNR IN P_DOCNO    and                  " DOCUMENT NO.
           GJAHR IN P_FYEAR    and               " FISCAL YEAR.
            blart ='RE'.
if sy-subrc = 0.
" do what ever you want here further processsing
else.
   message 'No Data Found' type 'I'.
   LEAVE-LIST PROCESSING.
ENDIF.
( or )
SELECT * FROM BKPF
INTO TABLE IT_BKPF
WHERE BELNR IN P_DOCNO    and                  " DOCUMENT NO.
           GJAHR IN P_FYEAR .                            " FISCAL YEAR
if sy-subrc = 0.
   loop at it_bkpf in wa_bkpf.
      if wa_bkpf-blart = 'RE'.
          " Do you logic what you want
     else.
   "   here you can do many things
     "     a) use CONTINUE statment to move to next loop pass
       "   b) you can raise an message
     endif.
Let me know if you need further information
Regards
Satish Boguda

Oracle equals_path condition NOT working with table and materialized view

The user i am using is xdb with dba role.
1.When i try to use the statement
SELECT PATH FROM xdb.path_VIEW
WHERE
EQUALS_PATH(res, '/home/OE/PurchaseOrders/2002')=1
the result is
/home/OE/PurchaseOrders/2002
2. When i drop the path_view and recreated it like materialized view with statement
create MATERIALIZED view path_view as
select /*+ ORDERED */ t2.path path, t.res res,
xmltype.createxml(xdb.xdb_link_type(NULL, r2.xmldata.dispname, t.name,
h.name, h.flags, h.parent_oid, h.child_oid),
'http://xmlns.oracle.com/xdb/XDBStandard.xsd', 'LINK') link,
t.resid
from ( select xdb.all_path(9999) paths, value(p) res, p.sys_nc_oid$ resid,
p.xmldata.dispname name
from xdb.xdb$resource p
where xdb.under_path(value(p), '/', 9999)=1 ) t,
TABLE( cast (t.paths as xdb.path_array) ) t2,
xdb.xdb$h_link h, xdb.xdb$resource r2
where t2.parent_oid = h.parent_oid and t2.childname = h.name and
t2.parent_oid = r2.sys_nc_oid$
then the equals_path condition STOP working !!!
3. The same experiment, but i recreate it like table
create table path_view as .... using the rest of the statement ...
Can someone help me to understand why equals_path is NOT working on table and materialized view !

Thanks Jonah. I was under the impression that I already had it but seems like it has to be a direct priv - thru a role doesn't work.
I granted the reqd privs and then it worked fine. Thx for your help!

Date Condition Not Working ,Value not cming in to item.

Hi Friends,
i have create a form for palce order and i have create a MASTER table for fixed item Rate between two date with price code like A,B,C,D .
In Form i have for Item
:P1_ORDER_DATE
:P1_ITEM_CODE
:P1_PRICE_CATEGORY Select List With Submit
:P1_ITEM_RATE
In Item rate i have put in Source ,
Source Type --SQL Quary
Source Vale
select RATE_1 from SAM_ITEM_MAS where ITEM_CODE =:P1_ITEM_CODE and PRICE_CATEGORY=:P1_PRICE_CATEGORY and :P1_ORDER_DATE
between FROM_DATE and TO_DATEMy Table
CREATE TABLE "SAM_ITEM_MAS"
   (     "ID" NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "ITEM_CODE" NUMBER,
     "PRICE_CATEGORY" VARCHAR2(5),
     "FROM_DATE" DATE,
     "TO_DATE" DATE,
     "RATE_1" NUMBER,
     CONSTRAINT "SAM_ITEM_MAS_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("ID") ENABLE
/that code's not working but if i run this code in to SQL Command Then it's work fine.but not in to ITEM :P1_ITEM_RATE .
i want when i select P1_PRICE_CATEGORY Like A,B,C,D then Respective Rate from Table SAM_ITEM_MAS should come in to item :P1_ITEM_RATE .
Oredr date condition is not working.
Thanks
Edited by: 805629 on Dec 28, 2010 11:32 PM

Hi,
Have you tried casting the item values as dates using TO_DATE():
select RATE_1
from SAM_ITEM_MAS
where ITEM_CODE =:P1_ITEM_CODE
and PRICE_CATEGORY=:P1_PRICE_CATEGORY
and TO_DATE(:P1_ORDER_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYY') between "FROM_DATE" AND "TO_DATE"(change the date format string to match the format of the P1_ORDER_DATE page item)
You should probably change the name of the field to something other than TO_DATE as this is an Oracle function name - try DATE_FROM and DATE_TO or START_DATE and END_DATE or something like that. Otherwise you may have to use the double-quotes as I have shown above
Andy

Condition not working if Part Number is not included in result

Good day
Please assist with the following?
A user wants to display a summary of values for different key figures on all Parts belonging to certain vehicle categories. One of the key figures (KF1) must only display values > (greater than) u20180u2019. He does not want the Part number to display in the report, but KF1 must be based on the individual values of the parts, example if Part V001 has amounts u201C-R200.00u201D, u201CR10.00u201D and R20.00u201D, the summary total to be displayed in the result must = u201CR30.00u201D. (u201C-R200.00u201D must not be included)
I have created a condition on this key figure (KF1) where I indicated the value > 0. When I run the query, the condition does not work on the summary of data, it still includes the values < (smaller than) u20180u2019.
Is there a way I can display the correct values?
Thanks in advance.
Cj

I am not sure if I understood your problem correctly. But to me seems like your problem can be solved at aggregates. I didnt understand your problem correctly, but let me put some pieces together and see of that helps you.
Lets say you have 3 different KFs.
KF1__KF2__KF3
-200__10___20
100___20___20
Now if you create a fourth KF (CKF), you dont want to consider the negative values of KF1. Meanging CKF should display 30 and NOT -190.
If that is the case for KF1, only, you can create one CKF1 which will calculate either 0 (if KF1 value is less than 0) or the KF1 value (if KF1 value is > 0). After this, your scenario will be,
CKF1 = (KF1 > 0)*KF1+0
KF1__CKF1_KF2__KF3
-200____0____10___20
100__100_____20___20
After that create second CKF2 to sum CKF1 + KF2 + KF1
KF1__CKF1__KF2__KF3__CKF2
-200_____0___10___20____30
100____100___20___20____140
Now if your problem is that if part is not part of query result, you sitll want to perform this calculation at part level. In that case, you can create an exception aggregation for CKF2 as part level. So, even if part no is not in query, the calculation will be performed at part no level.
- Dhaval.

XI - Receiver Determination Condition not working

I created a Condition on my Receiver Determination to stop some messages from being sent based on a field in our message.
It works when using some test tools (workbench, SOAPUI, etc) but not when coming from our MDM system. The beginning of the input message looks like what is listed at the bottom of this message(and it works).
But when coming from MDM the one node looks like this - there is no colon ( after the xmlns.
 <YMDMB_CREMDM xmlns='http://intel.com/MDM/BUPA/Vendor'
without the colon ( the condition does not work; with the colon it does work.
the sending system is not able to add the colon.
Does anyone know why the colon matters and what we can do to get around it in XI ??
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<YMDMB_CREMDM xmlns:='http://intel.com/MDM/BUPA/Vendor' xmlns:xsd='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' xmlns:soapenv='http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'>
 <IDOC BEGIN='1.0' xmlns=''>

below is the beginning of the XSD from the IDOC (it is custom but based on a SAP one - just added a few fields)
I also put the start of the input message below that.
also to make sure I was clear, if all we do is change this node of the input message by adding a colon after the xmlns everything works.
 <YMDMB_CREMDM xmlns='http://intel.com/MDM/BUPA/Vendor'
thanks
begging of XSD from IDOC
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
 <xsd:element name="YMDMB_CREMDM">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:element name="IDOC" type="YCREMDM.YMDMB_CREMDM" />
 </xsd:sequence>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:complexType name="YMDMB_CREMDM.E1BPADTTX">
here is beginning of input message
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<YMDMB_CREMDM xmlns='http://intel.com/MDM/BUPA/Vendor' xmlns:xsd='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' xmlns:soapenv='http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'>
 <IDOC BEGIN='1.0' xmlns=''>

Made condition not work in VL10G background

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for