Mail ignores my rule regarding header
Hi,
I added a rule in Mail:
If Delivered-To Contains moderator
then
Set Colour of Background to Red
I am subscibed to a mailing list and to know whether or not to CC somebody the Delivered-To heading has moderator for [email protected] in it:
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [email protected]
Delivered-To: moderator for [email protected]
Mail ignores my rule, any ideas why?
Cheers Tom
MacBook Pro Mac OS X (10.4.9) Intel
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
So because there are two you don't think I can write a rule just based on one of them?
Every e-mail on this list has the first Delivered-To: header on it so there's not much I can do about that...
Any suggestions?
Cheers
Tom
MacBook Pro Mac OS X (10.4.9) Intel
Similar Messages
-
Hi!
We need to implement authentication using our own methods, and the authentication
information is provided to the web service implementation in a basic authentication
header. The problem is, that the servlet
weblogic.webservice.server.servlet.WebServiceServlet, which handles web services
in
wls 7.0.sp2, always attempts to perform authentication, if the header is present.
Is there any way to circumvent this, because we want to implement authentication
on our own?
I already know two workarounds:
The best would of course be to implement a custom security realm for our own
authentication system. This is not an option, implementing an own security
realm is overkill for this specific web service.
The other way would be to route the requests by way of a custom servlet, which
would
remove the basic authentication header, and put the authentication info in custom
headers, such as x-auth: <user:password>, or smthng similar, and after successful
authentication, make a call to bea's servlet weblogic.webservice.server.servlet.WebServiceServlet.
But still, I'd like to know if there is any way to tell bea's servlet to ignore
the basic
authentication header?
Oh yeah, by the way, this is URGENT, as always. (really!! ;)
Toni NykanenCurrently there is no option to turn off security check.
I think you can use a servlet filter mapped to the URL
of your service, instead of a proxy servlet?
Regards,
-manoj
http://manojc.com
"Toni Nykanen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3ef1577b$[email protected]..
>
Hi!
We need to implement authentication using our own methods, and theauthentication
information is provided to the web service implementation in a basicauthentication
header. The problem is, that the servlet
weblogic.webservice.server.servlet.WebServiceServlet, which handles webservices
in
wls 7.0.sp2, always attempts to perform authentication, if the header ispresent.
Is there any way to circumvent this, because we want to implementauthentication
on our own?
I already know two workarounds:
The best would of course be to implement a custom security realm for ourown
authentication system. This is not an option, implementing an own security
realm is overkill for this specific web service.
The other way would be to route the requests by way of a custom servlet,which
would
remove the basic authentication header, and put the authentication info incustom
headers, such as x-auth: <user:password>, or smthng similar, and aftersuccessful
authentication, make a call to bea's servletweblogic.webservice.server.servlet.WebServiceServlet.
>
But still, I'd like to know if there is any way to tell bea's servlet toignore
the basic
authentication header?
Oh yeah, by the way, this is URGENT, as always. (really!! ;)
Toni Nykanen -
Cannot Redirect Incoming mail Using a Rule
I can no longer redirect mail using a rule (it worked the first few times, but no longer.) I have tried setting up a new user account, the mail will still not redirect using a rule.
Has anyone found a solution to this problem?
Macpro 2.0mhz Mac OS X (10.4.7)Michael,
If there is specific information you are after, then
it would be helpful to request that information
instead of just being short and snide.
You're assuming too much here. I don't know what the problem really is, not even whether there is a solution. To express in your own terms a different way to look at the situation, if there is a specific solution anyone here is after, then it would be helpful to provide all the relevant information instead of assuming that people willing to help is going to be able to guess what the problem really is...
And I don't need you to give me permission to believe what I want.
I haven't. Actually, what I've done is precisely acknowledging that.
His post was basically saying "Is anyone else out there having
trouble redirecting mail with a rule? If so... is there a solution?"
In other words, since I don't have that problem, and I don't even know what the problem really is, I should rather not have asked, right?
If I had other rules doing things with the messages that MIGHT
interefere with the process, I would have mentioned that.
Glad to know. Problem is, I'm confused now. What you said above made me believe that I should ask any specific questions I might have. Now, you seem to be saying that if no additional information was provided, that means I should assume that there is nothing else that could be relevant to the problem, and hence I shouldn't ask obviously redundant and unnecessary questions. Could you please clarify this?
Also, how was I supposed to know that this was the case? Should I assume that for every user that posts about a problem or only for you? If the latter, did I miss something that should have made me realize that was the case for you?
I'm not sure how to proceed now. I can honestly tell you that I still don't know what the problem is, nor whether it can be fixed. There is something about the fact that you're using a Gmail account that makes me wonder, but you've clearly stated below that I should go somewhere else if the information already provided isn't enough, so it seems the right thing to do here is to avoid wasting your time with stupid questions.
If this is not enough information for you...
then help someone else with their problem.
That's what I do, each and every day...
But just because you assume user error, doesn't mean
someone else hasn't found a solution to the problem that
3 of us have explained.
I'm not assuming anything. That's what I'm trying to tell you, that I don't really know what's going on. I'm just trying to understand the problem in case I or someone else that, as a result of the discussion, finds a better description of what the problem really is, can help. If you feel that's not appropriate and I should have tried to help only if I already knew what the problem is and how to fix it, I apologize for having wasted your time.
Oh! And I'm not sure the problem is the same in all the cases being discussed here either.
Regards. -
Essbase Load Rules File Header Issue
Hi,
Is it possible to specify more than one member for the same dimension in the Load Rules file Header?
Example: I need to load the same data in all the remaining months in current year.
I tried using a substitution variable in the header which is defined as Aug,Sep,Oct,Nov,Dec.
It loaded randomly. For each account, only one month is loaded.
It loads only as many data points as in the data file regardless of the number of members from the same dimension specified in the Header definition.
Any suggestions to correct this.
Using a Calc script to do a data copy cannot be used because of other process limitations.
Appreciate your thoughts.
Thanks,
-Ethan.Randomly? That's really interesting. But yeah, I wouldn't expect that to work.
I have a hard time thinking of a really good option that will handle an variable number of periods and is driven by a single subvar.
Run the load multiple times, cycling through the subvar settings? Or (faster, if Period is dense) create one load rule for each period, with the data column copied multiple times using field manipulation and the future Periods assigned to each column (rather than using a 'Data' field) and run only the rule you need? That option doesn't use a subvar at all, but still requires conditional logic in the process.
Alternatively, do the transformation in your source extract / parse the file. This is really the 'best' option but I appreciate there are sometimes constraints on changing upstream processes. -
Maverick Mail Printing Problem: prints email header on separate page from body of email. Why?!
Maverick Mail Printing Problem: prints email header on separate page from body of email. Why?!
For what it's worth, I can report exactly the same problem. I just recently converted from Outlook for Mac 2011 to Mail. I did the conversion while running Yosemite. I like pretty much everything about Mail EXCEPT that it take 2 pages to print a 1 page email!! The header appears on the top of p.1, followed by a blank space. The message begins at the top of p.2.
If you scale it down, you can get the message to begin to appear on the bottom of p.1, but clearly, Mail is inserting BIG SPACE between the header and the message. Changing the display fonts for Mail had no apparent effect (except that the font DID change, of course)....still a BIG SPACE between the header and the message.
Coming to Mail for the first time, I would have assumed that this was just a quirk of Mail, but am I understanding that some of you Mail users out there USED TO NOT have this problem?? I think it's pretty clear that it's Mail that's causing the problem, not the message, because I went over to my old Outlook and printed the same couple of messages with no such space between the header and the message. So Mail is inserting a space into the print formatted email message that is NOT there in Outlook's print formatted same message.
Be really nice to get rid of this problem, but my Apple Care free support has expired. Not sure I want to pay for something that's generic to Mail!! Anyone else made any progress on this? -
Mail has gone crazy. Header's and messages are mixed up. New Mac Book Pro. Migrated files from Time machine running snow leopard. Reinstall or new computer needed?
Ok; I'm not sure what you're doing. 36 hours is rather long. Seems like a new migration. Not what I intended.
Here's what I intended: from the newly-migrated and apparently-corrupt environment, create a new user, not related to any existing user, nor any migration-created user, or any other user for that matter. That is, use > System Preferences > Users and Groups, authenticate yourself by clicking on the padlock, and then click the + and create a wholly new user. Then log in under that user and establish the mail access.
36 hours? I'm wondering if there's an error or an exceedingly slow network here? Or a really, really slow disk? Or a sick backup? (WiFi isn't the path I'd usually choose, either.)
Failing the attempted second migration, I'd try a different tactic. Does your existing (old) system work? If so, I'd bypass the backup and connect an external (scratch) USB disk drive to the (old) sstem and then boot and use Disk Utility booted from the installer DVD disk or boot and use Disk Utility from the recovery partition or booted from a recovery partition created on some other external storage (details here vary by the OS X version and what hardware you have), and perform a full-disk backup of your original internal disk to (scratch) external storage. (Make sure you get the source and target disks chosen correctly here; copying the wrong way — from the scratch disk to your existing disk — will clobber your data!) In esssence, this will clone your existing boot disk. Then dismount the (formerly-scratch) external disk, transfer it over to the new system, and use it as the source of the migration, by performing a fresh OS X installation on the new system.
Target Disk Mode is also sometimes an option for accessing the disk for a migration, but that requires the right cable, and requires systems that have the same external connection; newer MacBook Pro systems use Thunderbolt for this, and older systems tend to use FireWire. And I'm guessing you don't have compatible hardware.
The details here can and do vary by your OS X versions and your particular Mac systems — if you'll identify the specific models and hardware, somebody might be able to better tailor the above (fairly generic) sequence to your particular configuration. -
Mail not following rules set by outlook
Hello everyone,
I cannot figure this one out. I have rules set up in outlook to sort mail into folders, but ios mail will not follow them. The folder shows up in ios mail, but all the emails still go to inbox while the folder remains empty. I am running ios7.1
Also, is there a way to turn off notifications for this folder only? I would not like to be alerted when mail arrives in this folder, but still alerted for mail arriving at my inbox.
ThanksAfter reading that thread over a few more times and doing some more research, what I found is that what I am asking to do is impossible. IOS mail cannot follow rules made by exchange that are client side only. Sorting mail by keywords in the subject line is a rule that can only be applied on the client side and not the server side.
-
Since upgrading from 10.4.11 to 10.5.6 I've had random issues with mail.app.
Rules have been an issue since upgrading. Application of rules was more or less OK, except for one set of messages that apparently the new mail.app couldn't/wouldn't filter, even when I deleted the old imported rule and created a new one. :-/
Today I find that mail.app has decided to stop applying all rules. If I select a single message and choose Apply Rules from the Message menu, it gets filtered as desired, except the messages mentioned above which still are not filtered.
Did I forget to buy the special superSecret, available only by special invitation from you know who, iDecoderRing?
Hints? Tips? No, I'm not interested in going to Thunderbird, at least not yet. I use it elsewhere and like it, but...
Thanks,
- JohnHow many condition entries do you have in the failing rule(s)? How many rules do you have? I have found that if a rule got too big I started seeing inconsistent execution - in this case auto-move of incoming mail based upon sending email address. Don't ask me how big is too big - I didn't capture that info, maybe 25+. I did find that reducing the number of entries within a rule once that rule became problematic did no good. I had to delete the offending rule and add a new (smaller) rule. The inconsistent auto-move behavior I was seeing went away when I had a smaller number of smaller rules.
But now I'm seeing a different rule problem
I have set up four rules to change each mail entry's color based upon its age. Same inconsistent behavior as above - but I can't trace it to running mail.app continuously for days or anything like that. I reboot/restart my MBP at least 1X/day. It appears that the rules engine simply get "lazy" after some unknown time period until it gets woken up by going to Message > Apply Rules. The "lazy" behavior is that it only executes the first active rule rather than all active rules. -
Hi,
I still have the same problem, and I can see that I'm not the only one that is experiencing rule issues. For me the mail rules stop working automatically after mail has been open for a few days, but if I "Apply Rules" to individual messages they work fine. Except for one that refuses to move the message to the designated folder. I know the rule is being executed because I have it change the color of the text, and that is working, just not the move. I also noticed that if I select all the new mail and "Apply Rules" none of the rules seem to be applied.
Finally, is there any way to tell mail to apply the rules to the inbox without selecting the individual messages? That would be very useful when mail "forgets" to apply the rules to incoming mail.
This is very frustrating. Before I upgraded to Leopard I had no problems at all with mail.app.
Any suggestions would be gratefully accepted...
- JohnHow many condition entries do you have in the failing rule(s)? How many rules do you have? I have found that if a rule got too big I started seeing inconsistent execution - in this case auto-move of incoming mail based upon sending email address. Don't ask me how big is too big - I didn't capture that info, maybe 25+. I did find that reducing the number of entries within a rule once that rule became problematic did no good. I had to delete the offending rule and add a new (smaller) rule. The inconsistent auto-move behavior I was seeing went away when I had a smaller number of smaller rules.
But now I'm seeing a different rule problem
I have set up four rules to change each mail entry's color based upon its age. Same inconsistent behavior as above - but I can't trace it to running mail.app continuously for days or anything like that. I reboot/restart my MBP at least 1X/day. It appears that the rules engine simply get "lazy" after some unknown time period until it gets woken up by going to Message > Apply Rules. The "lazy" behavior is that it only executes the first active rule rather than all active rules. -
Tiger to Leopard Mail Boxes and Rules?????
Can I drag my mail boxes and rules from a tiger system (10.4.11) to a leopard system (10.5.2)?
Thank youNiel wrote:
You should be able to, if they are in a place where the Mail application will look for them.
(33480)
I intended to drag from/to ~user<me>/Library/mail.
As I do sometimes, I posted the question then went and experimented. Wondering now if I can reverse what I did. I imported the mailboxes from the tiger machine, then modified the rules to point to the Import/mail box name.
Thinking it would be preferable to not have the Import mail box folder. So maybe I can drag the Imported folder to the trash and as you and the next guy suggested, just drag my tiger Mail folder and .plist file to leopard????
Message was edited by: buz -
i have lost my icloud account password and i have tried a lot to get back my password through i forgot but i have not recieved any mail to my id regarding the change of password
Check your spam mail. If you have more than one email address verified with that apple id that email will go to the rescue email.
About the rescue email address
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5312 -
Rv220w- content filtering ignoring firewall rules
Hello,
I face a strange bahavior with my rv220w router : I set up access rules to deny all outbound trafic for a particular IP range. It seems to work fine .... but when I enable content filtering, HTTP access on port 80 works again (and other ports are denied). It seems that activating content filtering makes the router ignore firewall rule. Bug ? Or did I miss someting ?
Thanks in advance for your help.Hello,
I've opened case # 621056469. The support engineer told me that he'll try to reproduce the problem on his side, and contact me back for remote testing on my own router. If the issue is already known, does it have some kind of ref number so that I can inform him ? Is a fix already planned for a future firmware release ?
Thanks for your help. -
What are the rules regarding posting of exam questions?
What are the rules regarding posting/discussing specific exam questions?
I just read the Rules of Conduct and I'm wondering if posting exam question falls under unauthorized information disclosure and if it somehow violates the confidentiality of SUN information as stated in
[CONFIDENTIALITY OF SUN INFORMATION|http://www.sun.com/termsofuse.jsp#g2_2]jwenting wrote:
That would be completely useless, as the questions are chosen semi-randomly from a large collection of questions so the topicspread you get may well be completely different from what someone else gets.
Of course there is probably a pretty well balanced mix, so going flat out on one topic to the exclusion of all else is sure to make you fail :)And those sorts of "hints" are also useless because they only really talk about the posters weaknesses. For example I might say "study Generics!" because that was the section of the exam I did the poorest in, but if you are solid with generics and weak with threading that won't do you much good. -
Yaourt (0.9.4-2) (aur) ignores IgnorePkg rules in /etc/pacman.conf
Usually doing yaourt -Syu --aur goes through and updates all of the packages I installed from aur unless the package is among those listed in the IgnorePkg array in pacman.conf. However, the recently updated yaourt from aur simply ignores the rule and prompts me to upgrade the package anyways. For example, I see this for bin32-wine.
opened a bug report:
http://bugs.archlinux.fr/task/170 -
Apple devices ignoring DHCP rules - using up all my IP addresses on the FiOS-G1100
Your lease time may be causing a bug in the DHCP client on Apple devices. That is an unusually long lease time so I wouldn't be surprised if it was something like an integer vs float vs signed integer problem in the code. Please consider cutting the leases down to 3600 minutes, and then use DHCP Reservation for any devices that you own which you would like to keep on a fixed IP.
Now if this is for guest devices, consider limiting your least time to 30 to 60 minutes. Many devices are mobile and do not need 90 day long leases. That's wasteful of an otherwise limited IP subnet.Apple devices ignoring DHCP rules - using up all my IP addresses on the FiOS-G1100 Hi all, I have now gone through two of the new quantum gateways and both allow Apple devices of all kinds to bypass the lease time that I set to something like 129600 Minutes for that specific IP Address (which is 90 days, or three months). People using our guest network end up taking all our non-static addresses and then we have none left to issue out to other users or staff. I'm about to receive my third g1100 from Verizon and I'm pretty sure it's not the box but the firmware. I've had to do 2-3 hard resets on both boxes since Jan '15 to erase everything and start over with loading custom settings back in. A Huge pain. Once all addresses are taken up and you login as Admin on the router, half of the UI options have now disappeared. Also in general there is no way to manually force the router to expire LAN IP addresses even after a hard reset. Or is there and I just have never seen this option? Anyone else experience this? I've spent about 3 hours with multiple reps who either don't believe me or have no idea how their product works. I'm beginning to either think I'm crazy or there's a bug and no one has reported it yet. Best,Lockdown
Maybe you are looking for
-
Please let me know the query/transaction/report for parked invoices with input as vendor and plant combination. Thanks.
-
Double click on output in write statement
hi, i have a list of PO as outout thru write statement(classical).i wamt to open me23n with the double click on that particular po. how could i do this? answer with full code.
-
How do I delete my mobileme e-mail account?
how do I delete my mobileme e-mail account?
-
BAPI - user last modified Name, Date and Time in SU01 of a Particular User
HI Experts, After searched a lot in SDN , i am posting this thread, I want to know any Standard BAPI to give LAST modified User name , time and Date in SU01 of a particular User. I checked * BAPI_USER_GET_DETAIL* , its giving LAST modified time an
-
How to create a parameter id on screen element
How to create a parameter id on screen element reply urgent