Mailbox Migration Performance Analysis

I'm attempting to follow the steps per this website
http://ppe.blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2014/03/24/mailbox-migration-performance-analysis.aspx in Exchange PowerShell and Step 4. is returning the following.
ProcessStats : The term 'ProcessStats' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function, script file, or operable program. Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the path is correct and try again.
At line:1 char:1
+ ProcessStats -stats $stats -name ProcessedStats1
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (ProcessStats:String) [], CommandNotFoundException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException
Any suggestions?

No luck with that format for step 1.
PS D:\temp> ..\AnalyzeMoveRequestStats.ps1
..\AnalyzeMoveRequestStats.ps1 : The term '..\AnalyzeMoveRequestStats.ps1' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet,
function, script file, or operable program. Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the
path is correct and try again.
At line:1 char:1
+ ..\AnalyzeMoveRequestStats.ps1
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (..\AnalyzeMoveRequestStats.ps1:String) [], CommandNotFoundException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException
PS D:\temp>

Similar Messages

Tuxedo Performance Analysis - Query - tried txrpt not receiving report

Hi All,
We have currently migrated from Solaris-8 - Tuxedo 8 environment to Solaris 10 - Tuxedo 11gr1 Staging environment.
All the application binaries were running fine.
However we conducted a performance testing for 500 users we could see the performance coming down, when compared to our old performance report of
Solaris 8 - tux8 environment.
However we doubt it may be some issue with the network or some other server via which the requests are hitting or responses leaving our system.
Can you suggest any utility or its usage by which we can check that our current Tuxedo version is working fine than the older one?
Like how much time tuxedo is taking now to process,the throughputs.
can you please suggest some way to monitor or generate some sort of report to compare tuxedo 8 performance and Tuxedo 11g R1 performance for same application.
tried the txrpt
I5_RQMG_0002_00
SRVGRP=AQUREQGRP
SRVID=2000
CLOPT="-r -s PSY_MG_0002_00:I5_RQMG_0002_00 -o logs/slog/I5_RQMG_0002_00.out -e logs/slog/I5_RQMG_0002_00.err"
MIN=1 MAX=1
RQADDR="I5_RQMG_0012_00Q2"
REPLYQ=Y
for this above server :
-rwxrwxrwx 1 tuxedo tuxedo 71022518 May 29 14:56 I5_RQMG_0002_00.err
I get the above file generated.
Executed the command:
tuxconsolas1:/apps/tuxapps/intserv/logs/slog>txrpt -nPSY_MG_0002_00 -d05/29 -s02:00 -e14:00 I5_RQMG_0002_00.err > txrpt.out
I am just receiving :
tuxconsolas1:/apps/tuxapps/intserv/logs/slog>less txrpt.out
START AFTER: Tue May 29 02:00:00 2012
END BEFORE: Tue May 29 14:00:00 2012
in the report and the process hangs for me.
Am i doing any error?
Edited by: 835542 on May 29, 2012 10:27 AM

Hi,
If you want detailed performance analysis of your Tuxedo 11gR1 application, you can use TSAM (Tuxedo System and Application Monitor) to get very detailed performance information including time spent on network links, time spent waiting in IPC queues, etc. Unfortunately you won't be able to use the same tool for your Tuxedo 8.0 application as it is too old for TSAM to support.
Regards,
Todd Little
Oracle Tuxedo Chief Architect

Slow Mailbox Migration

Hello All
We are in coexistence with 2007 and exchange 2013 and everything is working fine except mailbox migration, which is taking very long.
Mailbox size is average 200MB and migration for 10 mailboxes takes about 12 hours, even within the same LAN and across WAN link
The architecture is
DataCenter 1
2007 Environment
2013 CAS1
2013 Mailbox1
2013 Edge
DataCenter 2
2013 CAS2
2013 Mailbox2
2013 Edge2
Has anyone experienced problems like this before?
Thanks

Hi,
If the servers are performing other higher priority jobs, the mailbox movements will be stalled. When the servers get freed up from higher priority jobs, the mailbox movement resumes.
I recommend you use the New-MoveRequest cmdlet with the Priority parameter to check the result.
If only some mailboxes are affected, you can set the BadItemLimit parameter to a higher value to check the result.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Mailbox Migration Error

I am operating an Exchange 2013 CU7 in a co-exit environment with an Exchange 2010 server. when I try to setup a mailbox migration through the EAC I receive and Error "Multiple potential Migration mailboxes were found for this organization. Please
specify a particular Partition mailbox to use." and I can go any further or finish performing the migration.
any thoughts would be appreciated.

I contacted Microsoft to work through this error message and we were able to get it resolved.
hear is the solution for this error message.
within "Active Directory Users and Computer" in the
Users OU, find and delete the following accounts. (don't worry we will recreate them in a few moments.)
DiscoverySearchMailbox {D919BA05-46A6-415f-80AD-7E09334BB852}
FederatedEmail.4c1f4d8b-8179-4148-93bf-00a95fa1e042
Migration.8f3e7716-2011-43e4-96b1-aba62d229136
SystemMailbox{1f05a927-0acd-45d5-9bc1-1a123e6fc52e}
SystemMailbox{bb558c35-97f1-4cb9-8ff7-d53741dc928c}
SystemMailbox{e0dc1c29-89c3-4034-b678-e6c29d823ed9}
Once they are removed, go to your Exchange 2013 server and run the following command from an elevated command prompt
(locate the Exchange Setup File from you CD or download location and run)
Setup.exe /Preparead /IAcceptExchangeServerLicenseTerms (this recreates all the account we just deleted.)
we are almost done. next we have to enable the accounts. This time from 2013 "Exchange Management Shell" run the following commands one at a time.
Enable-Mailbox –Arbitration “DiscoverySearchMailbox {D919BA05-46A6-415f-80AD-7E09334BB852}”
Enable-Mailbox –Arbitration “FederatedEmail.4c1f4d8b-8179-4148-93bf-00a95fa1e042”
Enable-Mailbox –Arbitration “Migration.8f3e7716-2011-43e4-96b1-aba62d229136”
Enable-Mailbox –Arbitration “SystemMailbox{1f05a927-0acd-45d5-9bc1-1a123e6fc52e}”
Enable-Mailbox –Arbitration “SystemMailbox{bb558c35-97f1-4cb9-8ff7-d53741dc928c}”
Enable-Mailbox –Arbitration “SystemMailbox{e0dc1c29-89c3-4034-b678-e6c29d823ed9}”
Set-Mailbox "Migration.8f3e7716-2011-43e4-96b1-aba62d229136" -Arbitration –Management:$true
once you have completed this you will be able to close the Exchange Admin Centre, then log back in and go to Migration tab without any errors.

Mailbox migration using JavaMail

Has anyone ever attempted, successfully or otherwise, using the JavaMail API to write a program performing mailbox migration.
Essentially, the task of grabbing all the folders and msgs from one mailbox and putting them into another mailbox.
Thanks!
jrmy

See http://www.jservlet.com/
Use EMail object with Pop3 object (see method EMail.sendRedirect and use IMAP protocol for grabbing all folders)
regards,

Move Mailboxes from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2013 (Could not find a valid mailbox migration for esta organization)

Hi all, I am in full migration from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2013 and everything went correctly.
I have migrated several mailboxes and are working well. But a few days ago, when I try to migrate a mailbox I get the following error and can not migrate:
"Could not find a valid mailbox migration for this organization"
Do you know that you can be?
regards
Microsoft Certified IT Professional Server Administrator

Hi,
From your description, the issue should be related to the migration mailbox. I recommend you check if the following account is existed in ADUC.
Migration.8f3e7716-2011-43e4-96b1-aba62d229136
If this account does not exist, you need to run setup /prepareAD and then enable this migration mailbox to check the result.
Hope this can be helpful to you.
Best regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Vendor performance analysis report

Hi all,
requirement to create an ALV report for vendor performance analysis... wat r d tables n feilds which are to be used fr this... any help is appreciated..

Refer the links -
vendor performance report !!!
vendor performance report
vendor performance report
I need standard vendor performance report

NAM Report Analyze -- Wan Optimization -- Application Performance Analysis Report

Hello,
Transaction Time (Client Exprerience) report does not show optimized traffic. For this graph what we expect is to show side by side the transaction time of optimized and non optimized traffic side by side to give information about the baseline and optimized application performance.
May it be that the optimization should be disabled for some time for the Wan Sites, and after some time manually reenabled in order to compare these values? This should be difficult for large deployments since manually disabling and reenabling for performance analysis time taking task.
Best Regards,

Mohammed,
It is common, in many of the Cisco Express 8.5 environments we have looked at, for the Total Incoming Calls given on a Traffic Analysis report to be a higher number than an Application Report.
The Traffic Analysis Report counts every unique sessionID (unique call) that is inbound (contact type of 1). The Application Reports do a similar thing but qualify (filter) only the records that have an application assigned.
There are simply times where inbound calls have been directed to an "agent" without having an applicaiton assigned.
The best thing the reporting user can do is to run a query on his or her database such as:
select * from ContactCallDetail where contactType=1and startDateTime > '2012-11-16 10:00:00' and startDateTime < '2012-11-16 11:00:00';
Usually when an application is not assigned to the record in the ContactCallDetail table it is because the destination type is equal to 1, which is an 'Agent' instead of a 'route point'.
So if you modify your select statement to filter by destinationType, you can quickly find the records that don't have the application assigned.
Example: select * from ContactCallDetail where contactType = 1 and destinationType = 1 and startDateTime > '2012-11-16 10:00:00 and startDateTime < 2012-11-16 11:00:00';
When you look at these records, you will see the agent that took the call from the destinationID field. The number in that field should match up with the field called 'resourceID' in a table called 'resouce';
Example: select * from resource where resouce=6011; where 6011 was the number you found in the destinationID field.
If there is still confusion about the source of the call - then talk to that agent and find out what is was.
Good Luck and let me know if you need further help.
Ron Reif
[email protected]

Import Performance Analysis report

Hi,
I ran the import analysis report in FDM and it tells me the time taken by each step of import process. My question is why does it take time for "Memo Reassign Time". I am not doing anything with Memo. Is there a way to avoid the time it takes to reassign memo.
Thanks, AJ

Import Performance Analysis
File Archive Time 1
Memo Reassign Time 53
Total Import Process 254 Seconds
Total Map Process 65 Seconds
Almost 1/5th of the total time is taken by Memo Reassign Step for nothing. Is there a way to bring it to 0 seconds.

Performance analysis and monitoring of a Forteapplication

Hello,
It would be good if one could do some performance analysis and monitoring of
a Forte application at production time.
By performance analysis I mean measure the time some selected methods take
to return. In a CS application such a method would be some selected method
of a key remote service representative of the application's activity.
One would like to mesure the min, max, average time, and also give a
threshhold which when reached will automatically generate an alarm or some
pre-defined processing.
The most powerful way would be to use a SNMP application through a Forte -
SNMP gateway. (see the G. Puterbaugh paper "Building a Forte-SNMP gateway"
in the 96' Forte Forum proceedings).
But before going that far some simple means accessible through EConsole
would already be great.
A collegue of mine when to that Forum and reported that Puterbaugh said that
such an agent is currently missing, but that its implementation is not
difficult.
I looked at all the agents and their instruments. I came to the following
conclusions :
1) instrumented data are available at the granularity level of a partition,
not at a smaller granularity. For example, the DistObjectMgr agent gives you
very useful information : the number of events (sent/received) and the
number of (remote) methods (called/invoked), but this for the entire
partition. Thus it prevents making tuned observations (unless you partition
in a special way your application to put in a dedicated partition the thing
you want to observe and only this thing).
2) there is no instrumented data related to processing time.
This leads me to the point that no information observed by the standard
agents help me figuring out my performances. Thus I have to add at
development time some lines of code to the methods I potentially want to
observe later at production time to generate the appropriate information a
custom agent will then display (process) with the appropriate instruments.
Does someone share this position ?
Has someone implemented such an agent and assotiated means ?
PS: I will probably implement my own one if no other way around.
best regards,
Pierre Gelli
ADP GSI
Payroll and Human Resources Management
72-78, Grande Rue, F-92310 SEVRES
phone : +33 1 41 14 86 42 (direct) +33 1 41 14 85 00 (reception desk)
fax : +33 1 41 14 85 99

Hello,
It would be good if one could do some performance analysis and monitoring of
a Forte application at production time.
By performance analysis I mean measure the time some selected methods take
to return. In a CS application such a method would be some selected method
of a key remote service representative of the application's activity.
One would like to mesure the min, max, average time, and also give a
threshhold which when reached will automatically generate an alarm or some
pre-defined processing.
The most powerful way would be to use a SNMP application through a Forte -
SNMP gateway. (see the G. Puterbaugh paper "Building a Forte-SNMP gateway"
in the 96' Forte Forum proceedings).
But before going that far some simple means accessible through EConsole
would already be great.
A collegue of mine when to that Forum and reported that Puterbaugh said that
such an agent is currently missing, but that its implementation is not
difficult.
I looked at all the agents and their instruments. I came to the following
conclusions :
1) instrumented data are available at the granularity level of a partition,
not at a smaller granularity. For example, the DistObjectMgr agent gives you
very useful information : the number of events (sent/received) and the
number of (remote) methods (called/invoked), but this for the entire
partition. Thus it prevents making tuned observations (unless you partition
in a special way your application to put in a dedicated partition the thing
you want to observe and only this thing).
2) there is no instrumented data related to processing time.
This leads me to the point that no information observed by the standard
agents help me figuring out my performances. Thus I have to add at
development time some lines of code to the methods I potentially want to
observe later at production time to generate the appropriate information a
custom agent will then display (process) with the appropriate instruments.
Does someone share this position ?
Has someone implemented such an agent and assotiated means ?
PS: I will probably implement my own one if no other way around.
best regards,
Pierre Gelli
ADP GSI
Payroll and Human Resources Management
72-78, Grande Rue, F-92310 SEVRES
phone : +33 1 41 14 86 42 (direct) +33 1 41 14 85 00 (reception desk)
fax : +33 1 41 14 85 99

[request] Intel VTune Performance Analyser

Hello, I am wondering if someone have made a pkgbuild for the Intel VTune Performance Analyser: http://www.intel.com/cd/software/produc … 239143.htm. At the moment I do not have the skills or time to make a PKGBUILD, so I am hoping that someone already have done it. I am planning too learn the PKGBUILD system, so if do not have any success with request, I may prowide a PKGBUILD, in a distant future!

OK.
ThinkPad Edge E530 (3259-AD9)
i5-3210M(2.5Ghz), 6GB RAM, 750GB 5400rpm HD, 15.6in 1366x768 LCD, Intel HD Graphics, 802.11bgn wireless, 1Gb Ethernet, UltraNav, Fingerprint reader, Camera, 6c Li-Ion, Win7 Home Premium 64
First, in case you don't have it, here's your complete driver matrix: http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/research/hints-or-tips/detail.page?&DocID=HT073274
From there, please confirm that you have installed the most recent release of the Intel HD Graphics drivers:
http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/research/hints-or-tips/detail.page?&DocID=HT073274 from November 2013.
Regards.
English Community Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество
Community Resources: Participation Rules • Images in posts • Search (Advanced) • Private Messaging
PM requests for individual support are not answered. If a post solves your issue, please mark it so.
X1C3 Helix X220 X301 X200T T61p T60p Y3P • T520 T420 T510 T400 R400 T61 Y2P Y13
I am not a Lenovo employee.

Performance Analysis in Oracle Enterprise Manger console..

Hi,
Following is a findings of performance analysis section of Oracle Enterprise Manager.
SQL statements consuming significant database time were found.
======
While clicking on above link system opens another page and it should following details.
Action Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SQL statement with SQL_ID "5z50bh2wj1svt".
SQL Text SELECT /*+FIRST_ROWS INDEX(a ttdpur041730$idx4)*/ a.t$amta,a.t$bqua,a.t$btsp,a.t...
SQL ID 5z50bh2wj1svt
Rationale SQL statement with SQL_ID "5z50bh2wj1svt" was executed 732 times and had an average elapsed time of 2.9 seconds.
The impact of this finding is 77% ...
THis is an erp apps where we don't have any source code ...
Any suggestions to reduce impact form 77%
SSM

I don't think that the system tablespace datafile is 92% being filled is a problem,but his what you can do:
set oracle_sid=<your SID>
I take it the path includes the correct <oracle_home>\bin
sqlplus / as sysdba
alter database datafile 'E:\path_to\system.dbf' AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 1M MAXSIZE 2000M; replace 'E:\path_to by the correct disk and path.
Changing a datafile size (resize) or changing a datafile so it is able to autoexextend can also be done by the EM itself.
The controlfile can grow over time but I haven't seen any problems with it's size.
Sorry, I can't explain the backup issue.
Eric

BOM Performance Analysis using SAT or SE30 t-code?

Hi,
Currently I'm doing performance analysis of BOM to find out the bottlenecks. I'm doing the analysis using SAT or SE30 t-code.
From my understanding, BOM performance depends upon
1. no. of BOM items
2. BOM Level
3. BOM Evolution over time
Can anyone provide me a hint to find out the bottlenecks in BOM performance. Thanks!!
Regards,
Saravana

I have done the BOM Performance Analysis. Based on the most execution time and top performance consumers, please find my observations…
Functionally, Performance of BOM execution depends upon
Number of BOM items available in the BOM
Number of Assemblies present in the BOM
BOM Levels
BOM Evolution over time
Technically, BOM execution time is purely depends upon
fetching the data from the SAP tables
hitting the same table again and again when goes down the level
loop at the tables / Nested functions used in SAP Program
Hence, I'm closing this thread.....

Performance analysis program

hello gurus!
Someboody can send me the program name for making performance analysis in queries and infocube, please?
Thanks a lot.
BR.

i think there is no particular program, to performance analysis. there are different scenaios based on that particular performance issues.
check the link
http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=%20performance%20analysis%20in%20queries%20and%20infocube%2C%20%20in%20sap%20bi%20in%20sdn&source=web&cd=9&ved=0CFoQFjAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcsc-studentweb.lr.edu%2Fswp%2FBerg%2Farticles%2FTeched2010%2FBerg_TechEd_2010_Performance_Tuning_v5.pptx&ei=e1zwTvWmJ4ayrAfA5KXSDw&usg=AFQjCNGy7RVynsLUPqKInmQGlVCSbaxlQA&cad=rja

Performance analysis with SE30

Hi,
I want to know about performance analysis with SE30 How much should be percentage of DATABASE SYSTEM and on ABAP how to reduce the load of system and which is more critical load on DATABASE OR abap, also for my report i have checked with different parameter according to the posting period which i have selected the graph is changing
regards,
zafar

There are a variety of materials on the subject of Performance Analysis and SE30. If you'll take the time to search the blogs and articles in SCN, I'm confident you'll find something useful...
Percentages vary, depending upon what we're doing, which tables we're using, how many tables, etc. So, there are no hard and fast rules about what the percentages should be (so far as I know). Generally, very high database percentages can predict long runtime if one is obtaining a large number of data rows, and suggest (to me, at least) the need to review the select statements within the ST05 trace tool, to be sure I'm utilizing index and doing so optimally for each table I'm reading, that I'm not bypassing SAP buffers if not necessary, etc.

Mailbox Migration Performance Analysis

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for