Mailbox Transport health state unhelathy

Hi team,
I check my Exchange 2013 Mailbox server, abd the result, Mailbox Transport health set become unhealthy
and after i check into mailbox transport detail, there is some error. here the details
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>get-healthreport -server BCEJKT-MBX2-SVR | where {$_.alertvalue -ne "healthy"} | ft -auto
Server State HealthSet AlertValue LastTransitionTime MonitorCount
NotApplicable FIPS Unhealthy 8/6/2014 3:41:14 AM 22
NotApplicable Monitoring Unhealthy 8/6/2014 3:56:32 AM 9
NotApplicable MailboxTransport Unhealthy 8/6/2014 4:11:41 AM 56
NotApplicable MSExchangeCertificateDeployment Disabled 1/1/0001 7:00:00 AM 2
Server State Name TargetResource HealthSetName AlertValue ServerComp
onent
NotApplicable Mapi.Submit.Monitor MailboxTransport MailboxTransport Unhealthy None
NotApplicable MailboxDeliveryAvail MailboxTransport Unhealthy None
abilityMonitor
NotApplicable TransportDeliveryFai MailboxTransport Disabled None
luresDeliveryStoreDr
iver560Monitor
what error means?
and, why the state "NotApplicable" ?
Is there any services trouble (disturbed)?
Please give me details :)
Thanks
Regards

Hi,
There is no official document explaining the state "NotApplicable". Search all related articles about HealthSet, the state is always NotApplicable.
From the output of running Get-HealthReport cmdlet, FIPS, Monitoring and MailboxTransport health set are unhealthy. Please use the Test-ServiceHealth cmdlet to check result.
Besides, please check the application log and system log for events related to this feature.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

How Do I create a health state dashboard for a group of servers in SCOM 2012 R2

I am aiming to create a health state dashboard which would show the agent health for a particular group of server. But unable to find the option for the appropriate widget. Can somebody suggest how should I proceed on this?

There is state widget for show status of computer health or warning or critical
http://blogs.technet.com/b/antoni/archive/2013/05/13/operations-manager-2012-dashboard-widgets.aspx
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"Mai Ali | My blog:
Technical | Twitter:
Mai Ali

Unable to retrieve topology component health states

Hi,
SharePoint 2013 SP1 + Sep 2014 CU and SQL Server 2012 SP1
i have created search service application using power shell and also using central administration but both times i am getting following error message when access search service application.
Unable to retrieve topology component health states. This may be because the admin component is not up and running
Pls guide how to fix it
thx
iffi

Hi Imughal,
This issue can be caused by many reasons, please check ULS log for detailed error message.
If the issue is caused by Event ID: 6482 error “A call to SSPI failed, see inner exception”, then
it can be caused by the following reasons:
The timer service account is trying to communicate with HostController service and generates 'SSPI Connect' call demanding SPN to be created for target services Identity, if no SPN is found.
The Hostcontroller service's NodeRunner process is limited to use restricted amount of RAM.
Then please follow the steps in the link below for solving this issue:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bkr_sharepoint/archive/2014/06/09/sharepoint-2013-search-topology-activation-error-quot-unable-to-retrieve-topology-component-health-states-this-may-be-because-of-the-admin-component-is-not-up-and-running-quot.aspx
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Custom Monitor Health State Troubleshooting Techniques

Hi,
I have created a Custom Timed Script 2-state Monitor through Ops Console in SCOM 2012 SP1 and the health state is misbehaving and remains Healthy always, even while the unhealthy expression should be evaluated as True.
I have confirmed the monitor is targeted to class IIS FTP Server, as the monitor appears in Health Explorer for FTP Server and is displayed as enabled.
I have used LogScriptEvent in the script to write an event of the results of the script on the agent and the value that will be passed back to the SCOM server, so I also know the script is executing and generating the correct results.
The script returns a numeric value, either 0 or a positive value (ie. no negative value number).
The healthy expression is = 0. The unhealthy expression is > 0.
The returned value represents the number of missing files and when it is for example 12, the health state is not changing to unhealthy and no alert is generated.
I have updated the MP version and confirmed the agent receives the latest version.
I have flushed the agent health state.
I have reset and recalculated the monitor.
I have reviewed agent and server event logs and do not see any related errors.
I have used a simple alert description in case it itself had an error and was preventing a healthy state change.
I have review the xml and see no issue. I updated the monitor xml manually to receive and compare the script value as an integer (instead of the default string type that the gui creates).
I wish I knew how to see the results of the SCOM workflow that determines if a health state change is required.
My next steps in the absence of a better action plan, is to reverse the healthy/unhealthy expressions to see what happens or recreate the MP from scratch.
Any help would be greatly appreciated as I have been banging my head on this one!!

Thanks for the response Andy.
Actually, you are only partially correct. The returned value IS a string by default, however you CAN cast it as an Integer if you export the MP to xml, substitute value String with Integer, and reimport the MP.
Root cause of the issue turned out to be a typo in the parameter syntax used in the health expression.
It was an easy catch once I compared side-by-side a working monitoring against the unworking monitor. Good example of how going too fast can actually slow you down :)
Thanks again for taking the time to respond!

Unable to retrieve topology component health states. This may be because the admin component is not up and running.

Unable to retrieve topology component health states. This may be because the admin component is not up and running.
I have deleted Search Service App and created again.
But still same error can anyone give me check list.. I need it very urgently.
Please reply
Thanks
Raj

Hi Raj,
This issue can be caused by many reasons, so please check the ULS log for detailed error message.
For SharePoint 2013, by default, ULS log is at C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\LOGS.
Here are some similar issues and the corresponding solutions for you take a look:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bkr_sharepoint/archive/2014/06/09/sharepoint-2013-search-topology-activation-error-quot-unable-to-retrieve-topology-component-health-states-this-may-be-because-of-the-admin-component-is-not-up-and-running-quot.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sambetts/archive/2013/08/28/sp2013-win2012-unable-to-retrieve-topology-component-health-states-this-may-be-because-the-admin-component-is-not-up-and-running.aspx
http://techtrainingnotes.blogspot.com/2013/09/unable-to-retrieve-topology-component.html
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

ConfigMgr 2007 Management Point Health: State

I am getting this, how to fix this issue. SCOM 2012
Any body knows the triage to fix this issue
Manjish

Hi,
Verify that the SMS Agent service is running.
Check the MPControl.log file and component status for MP_CONTROL_MANAGER for more details.
ConfigMgr 2007 Management Point Health: State Rule
http://mpwiki.viacode.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=119435
Note: Microsoft provides third-party contact information to help you find technical support. This contact information may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this third-party contact information.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Group Member showing incorrect Health State

Hi Everybody,
Just looking for a few thoughts on an issue I've had today and a couple of times in the past.
We are running SCOM 2012 and use dynamic groups based on name to send notifications to the right people. Today we had a critical alert however when looking at the group members the health state for the server was only at warning level and a notification
was not sent.
The critical alert was that the server was not contactable, other notifications do however seem to work.
Am I just missing something simple here?
Many thanks,
Allan
Edit - All other health status' match the alerts states and now that the critical issue is resolved the health state matches at a warning level.

Allan,
look at this Kevin's blog
http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinholman/archive/2008/02/01/configuring-notifications-to-include-specific-alerts-from-specific-groups-and-classes.aspx. This is exactly what I think.
But be aware, this will only solve problem with notifications.
If you get in situations like in your first post you will stil not see health rollup to particular windows computer in case of "The Failed to Connect to Computer". Instead you will see coresponding "Health Service Watcher" in critical state.
This is because class "Windows Computer" does not host class "Health Service Watcher", so health form watcher can't rollup to health of windows computer.
Watcher is something that reside on management servers or in other words MS's are owner of agent watcher instances.
The purpose of these watcher is to show you agent health from "network" perspective...
Regards,
Ivan

JMS Health State

At the following URL it states that the JMSRuntimeMBean and
          JMSServerRuntimeMBeans expose a HealthState via a getHealthState() method
          call:
          http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs70/admin_domain/monitoring.html
          From the text of this message is would appear that this health state is
          related to the health of the JMS thread pool:
          "...the JMS subsystem monitors the condition of the JMS thread pool..."
          But after substantial testing it does not appear that the health state
          changes. It has defined 4 levels: OK (0), WARNING (1), CRITICAL (2), and
          FAIL (3), but I have never seen it move to anything other than 0 (OK).
          Here is my test environment:
          JMS Thread Pool set to 2 threads (reduced from 15 to try to observe this
          condition)
          For my Topic I have a maximum message count of 10 (again to try to observe
          errors)
          I have 200 threads sending 224 bytes of data into the JMS topic at 4 second
          intervals. I have observed the byte and message throughput to drop to
          almost nothing with pending bytes and messages, but the health state is
          still OK. Furthermore, with only 2 threads to service 200 requests (backing
          up at some times to 300 concurrent connections? and a default execute queue
          of 50 threads (100% in use) and a queue length of 180), you would think that
          the health state would reflect a problem.
          Any insight?
          Thanks!
          Steve


sorry in health collumn it showing warning , for that deploymnet

JTA health state has changed to HEALTH_WARN

Hi 
 I've got the following warning: 
 The JTA health state has changed from HEALTH_OK to HEALTH_WARN with reason codes: Resource OracleStore_1 declared unhealthy.
 
 Can u point out a document, that describes rules of changing JTA's health state ? 
 
 regards
 Lukas 
 WLS 9.2

First of all, it's not likely there is lost data but the proposed solution to delete store directories will destroy data and is not normally recommended. It's much more likely that the data in question never made it into the system as the transactions that inserted data are in the process of rolling back or already rolled back (the exception in the first post indicates the transaction rolled back); or possibly the data is part of an unresolved transaction that has a pending commit.
There appear to be two different problems in this thread and it's doubtful the same solution would apply to both. Based on the minimal information provided:
- (A) check your server log for precursor warnings and errors
- (B) increase transaction timeouts (the global domain default is 30 seconds)
- (C) reboot your WebLogic servers
- (D) ensure your up-to-date on service-packs/patches
- (E) contact customer support
HTH,
Tom

Disk health state dont change OS health state

Hi,
Scenario: SCOM 2012 R2 UR4.
The health state of a disk in a given server dont change the health state at OS.
The health state at disk is warning, but the health state at OS is OK.
The questions are:
Is this behavior normal?
How to configure health state at OS to be the same at disk?
Thanks in advance!

As of i have seen even i have seen such situations in my SCOM 2007 R2 where it shows Healthy event if there are multiple Monitors in a critical state.
Based on my understanding SCOM calculates based on the Dependency monitor.
Example: Best state and worst state.
1.So may be even though that disk related issue is there but that totally does not affect the Health of the Agent.
2.In case if there is any specific service named Service 1 which is in a critical state and there is Service 2 and if Service 2 has also become critical because it depends on Service 1. So because of 1 service multiple services are in a non healthy state,
Then if this is the case at that time the agent may change to a critical state in the dashboard.
May be your current situation is like example 1 and not like example 2 so you are still getting the state as Healthy in the Dashboard.
=============================
Any one please correct me if i am wrong.
Gautam.75801

WEBLOGIC MANGED SERVER HEALTH STATE IS UNKNOWN

Dear Team,
I am working as support engineer in a production environment.
I am facing some issue described below:
1. One of Weblogic managed server health state is WARNING. I have checked in managed server log and found below error:
<Jun 22, 2014 5:13:37 AM IST> <Error> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000337> <[STUCK] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)' has been busy for "7,222" seconds working on the request "Workmanager: nlsi/wm/MarshallerWorkManager, Version: 0, Scheduled=true, Started=true, Started time: 7222299 ms
", which is more than the configured time (StuckThreadMaxTime) of "7,200" seconds. Stack trace:
As the Health is in warning state managed server become fully unresponsive.
Now I have following query:
1. What is the risk if managed server health state is WARNING?
2. Is Stuck thread will make the server go into an Unknown state?
3. If managed server state in UNKNOWN then what is the risk?
3. Could you please provide any solution so that in future we should not face this WARNING health state.
4. Could you please investigate why this health state WARNING occur?
Please help me.
Regards,
Maity

Dear Team,
I am working as support engineer in a production environment.
I am facing some issue described below:
1. One of Weblogic managed server health state is WARNING. I have checked in managed server log and found below error:
<Jun 22, 2014 5:13:37 AM IST> <Error> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000337> <[STUCK] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)' has been busy for "7,222" seconds working on the request "Workmanager: nlsi/wm/MarshallerWorkManager, Version: 0, Scheduled=true, Started=true, Started time: 7222299 ms
", which is more than the configured time (StuckThreadMaxTime) of "7,200" seconds. Stack trace:
As the Health is in warning state managed server become fully unresponsive.
Now I have following query:
1. What is the risk if managed server health state is WARNING?
2. Is Stuck thread will make the server go into an Unknown state?
3. If managed server state in UNKNOWN then what is the risk?
3. Could you please provide any solution so that in future we should not face this WARNING health state.
4. Could you please investigate why this health state WARNING occur?
Please help me.
Regards,
Maity

ManagedAvailability problem with Mailbox Transport Submission after CU6

We are getting the following error after CU6 implementation:
Seems like a latency issue... But, all tests are succesful, we are not experience any harm/issue. So, can we consider it as "by design" or should we take action?
Mailbox Transport Submission - the verification that the probe messages were successfully submitted within 5 minutes to HUB has failed.
This could indicate that the mailbox submissions are taking too long or not progressing at all.
SequenceNumber: 635484312145508431
Error: MapiSubmitLAMProbe finished with CheckPreviousMail failure.
FailureContext: MapiSubmitLAMProbe finished with CheckPreviousMail failure.
ExecutionContext: MapiSubmitLAMProbe started. This performs - 1. Submits a new message to Store 2. Checks results from previous Send Mail operation. Sequence # = 635484312145508431. First Run? = False. Previous mail submission to store was successful. Results
- # of previous results: 0. Could Not Find stages that ran. Previous SendMail failure - Mail submitted to Store during the previous run never reached SendAsCheck.
This may indicate a latency from Store to Submission Service. Investigating. Found lower SA latency. Indicates an issue in Submission service.

Using the message tracking logs, i found that my single exchange server tries to be high available and therefore wants to copy the mail to be transported to a different server before it transports it.As it can not find a suitable server to backup to, *THIS
BACKUP ONLY STEP* failes. The transport will be done nevertheless, without problems.
Get-MessageTrackingLog -Server MyServer -messageid [email protected] | ft Timestamp, EventID
Timestamp EventId
11.04.2015 01:51:36 DELIVER
11.04.2015 01:51:36 RECEIVE
11.04.2015 01:51:36 SUBMIT
11.04.2015 01:51:36 --> HAREDIRECTFAIL <--
11.04.2015 01:51:36 RECEIVE
11.04.2015 01:51:36 AGENTINFO
11.04.2015 01:51:36 SEND

Mailbox database contentindex state is failed

Hi,
I have two mailbox servers in DAG (MBX01 & MBX02).
when I check database copy status it show contentindex state failed on mbx02 server.
I tried with command update-mailboxdatabasecopy -identity database1 -catalogonly but it is gives error;
The operation couldn't be performed because 'database\*' matches multiple entries.
how to resolve it, please share resolution.

Hi,
Please seed the content index catalog using the Update-MailboxDatabaseCopy -CatalogOnly cmdlet to check the result.
You need to specify the Mailbox server on which the database1 is, here is an example for your reference.
Update-MailboxDatabaseCopy -Identity DB1\MBX2 -SourceServer MBX1 -CatalogOnly
For more details about this command, you can refer to the article below.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/dd335201(v=exchg.141).aspx
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Agent health state issues

scom2012R2
Under Monitoring - Operations Manager-Agent Details-Agent Health Status
I have a number odd server states showing, i.e.,
1) Agent State from Health Service Watch pane shows server as critical
while Agent State pane shows state as healthy - grey circle with check mark
Tried a agent repair and no change
2) Agent State from Health Service Watch pane shows server as healthy with green cirlce and check mark
while Agent State pane shows state as green circle not monitored
Tried a agent repair and no change
3) Agent State from Health Service Watch pane shows server as critical
while Agent State pane shows state as grey triangle Warning
Tried a agent repair and no change
Under Active Alerts a number of servers show as critical with Alert Details as
This monitor indicates that the target System Center Management Health Service that this Watcher is monitoring was not able to load internal system rules.
It says the resolution is to do a repair but that did not help
NM

Hi,
This two views are important – because it gives us a perspective of the agent from two different points:
1. The perspective of the agent monitors running on the agent, measuring its own “health”.
2. The perspective of the “Health Service Watcher” which is the agent being monitored from a Management Server".
If any of these are red or yellow – that is an excellent place to start. This should be an area that your level 1 support for Operations manager checks DAILY. We should never have a high number of agents that are not green here. If they
aren't – this is indicative of an unhealthy environment, or the admin team not adhering to best practices (such as keeping up with hotfixes, using maintenance mode correctly, etc…
Use Health Explorer on these views – to drill down into exactly what is causing the Agent, or Health Service Watcher state to be unhealthy.
Please go through the link below for more details:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinholman/archive/2009/10/01/fixing-troubled-agents.aspx
Regards,
Yan Li
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Error During Exchange 2013 Mailbox Transport Role Install On Server 2012

I was installing Exchange 2013 on Server 2012. The server is not a DC, but is a member of a domain with a 2008 R2 functional level, and I was logged in as a domain admin. There has never been an Exchange instance on this domain. I got past
the prerequisite checks, and the installer showed 15 steps, so I walked away. When I came back, I saw this:
Step 8 of 15: Mailbox role: Transport service
Error:
The following error was generated when "$error.Clear();
 $maxWait = New-TimeSpan -Minutes 8
 $timeout = Get-Date;
 $timeout = $timeout.Add($maxWait);
 $currTime = Get-Date;
 $successfullySetConfigDC = $false;
 while($currTime -le $timeout)
 $setSharedCDCErrors = @();
 try
 Set-SharedConfigDC -DomainController $RoleDomainController -ErrorVariable setSharedCDCErrors -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue;
 $successfullySetConfigDC = ($setSharedCDCErrors.Count -eq 0);
 if($successfullySetConfigDC)
 break;
 Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("An error ocurred while setting shared config DC. Error: " + $setSharedCDCErrors[0]);
 catch
 Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("An exception ocurred while setting shared config DC. Exception: " + $_.Exception.Message);
 Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Waiting 30 seconds before attempting again.");
 Start-Sleep -Seconds 30;
 $currTime = Get-Date;
 if( -not $successfullySetConfigDC)
 Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Error "Unable to set shared config DC.";
 " was run: "Unable to set shared config DC.".
The only option on the screen was exit, so I did. I checked the start menu, and there were two new Exchange icons, but I did not click them. I ran the installer again, and it detected an incomplete install, the only option was to click next to
finish the install, so I clicked next. This time, I eventually got the same error, except the screen showed "Step 8 of 15: Mailbox role: Transport service." I did install some Exchange 2010 prerquisites on the server before Exchange Server 2013
came out, and I can rebuild the server and try the install again if that would be best, but I thought I should post here first and try to work through this since the product is so fresh. Any suggestions?

I've tried three times since my last post, following
http://msexchange2010.info/archives/2330 as closely as possible the most recent time. I am consistently getting the same error that appears to imply I don't have write access to the domain. I don't understand this, because I am using the
same domain admin account I have been using all along. Nonetheless, here is the powershell output starting with the first Exchange setup.exe step (all other steps were already performed, all available updates were installed, and the server was rebooted
prior to this):
Windows PowerShell
Copyright (C) 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
PS (domain admin home)> D:
PS D:\> .\Setup.exe /PrepareSchema /IAcceptExchangeServerLicenseTerms
Welcome to Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 Unattended Setup
Copying Files...
File copy complete. Setup will now collect additional information needed for installation.
Performing Microsoft Exchange Server Prerequisite Check
Prerequisite Analysis COMPLETED
Configuring Microsoft Exchange Server
Extending Active Directory schema COMPLETED
The Exchange Server setup operation completed successfully.
PS D:\> .\Setup.exe /PrepareAD /OrganizationName:PRD-INC /IAcceptExchangeServerLicenseTerms
Welcome to Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 Unattended Setup
Copying Files...
File copy complete. Setup will now collect additional information needed for installation.
Performing Microsoft Exchange Server Prerequisite Check
Prerequisite Analysis COMPLETED
Setup will prepare the organization for Exchange 2013 by using 'Setup /PrepareAD'. No Exchange 2010 server roles have b
een detected in this topology. After this operation, you will not be able to install any Exchange 2010 servers.
For more information, visit: http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.NoE14ServerWarning.
aspx
Configuring Microsoft Exchange Server
Organization Preparation COMPLETED
The Exchange Server setup operation completed successfully.
PS D:\> .\Setup.exe /Mode:Install /Roles:ClientAccess, Mailbox, ManagementTools /t E:\Exchange /IAcceptExchangeServe
rLicenseTerms
Welcome to Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 Unattended Setup
Copying Files...
File copy complete. Setup will now collect additional information needed for installation.
Languages
Management tools
Mailbox role: Transport service
Mailbox role: Client Access service
Mailbox role: Unified Messaging service
Mailbox role: Mailbox service
Client Access role: Front End Transport service
Client Access role: Client Access Front End service
Performing Microsoft Exchange Server Prerequisite Check
Configuring Prerequisites COMPLETED
Prerequisite Analysis COMPLETED
Configuring Microsoft Exchange Server
Preparing Setup COMPLETED
Stopping Services COMPLETED
Copying Exchange Files COMPLETED
Language Files COMPLETED
Restoring Services COMPLETED
Language Configuration COMPLETED
Exchange Management Tools COMPLETED
Mailbox role: Transport service COMPLETED
Mailbox role: Client Access service COMPLETED
Mailbox role: Unified Messaging service COMPLETED
Mailbox role: Mailbox service FAILED
The following error was generated when "$error.Clear();
if ($RoleIsDatacenter -ne $true)
if (Test-ExchangeServersWriteAccess -DomainController $RoleDomainController -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue)
$sysMbx = $null;
$name = "SystemMailbox{bb558c35-97f1-4cb9-8ff7-d53741dc928c}";
$dispName = "Microsoft Exchange";
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Retrieving mailboxes with Name=$name.");
$mbxs = @(Get-Mailbox -Arbitration -Filter {name -eq $name} -IgnoreDefaultScope -ResultSize 1 );
if ($mbxs.Length -eq 0)
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Retrieving mailbox databases on Server=$RoleFqdnOrName.");
$dbs = @(Get-MailboxDatabase -Server:$RoleFqdnOrName -DomainController $RoleDomainController);
if ($dbs.Length -ne 0)
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Retrieving users with Name=$name.");
$arbUsers = @(Get-User -Filter {name -eq $name} -IgnoreDefaultScope -ResultSize 1);
if ($arbUsers.Length -ne 0)
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Enabling mailbox $name.");
$sysMbx = Enable-Mailbox -Arbitration -Identity $arbUsers[0] -DisplayName $dispName -database $dbs[0
].Identity;
else
if ($mbxs[0].DisplayName -ne $dispName )
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Setting DisplayName=$dispName.");
Set-Mailbox -Arbitration -Identity $mbxs[0] -DisplayName $dispName -Force;
$sysMbx = $mbxs[0];
# Set the Organization Capabilities needed for this mailbox
if ($sysMbx -ne $null)
# We need 1 GB for uploading large OAB files to the organization mailbox
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Setting mailbox properties.");
set-mailbox -Arbitration -identity $sysMbx -UMGrammar:$true -OABGen:$true -GMGen:$true -ClientExtensions
:$true -MailRouting:$true -MaxSendSize 1GB -Force;
else
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Cannot find arbitration mailbox with name=$name.");
else
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info "Skipping creating E15 System Mailbox because of insufficient permission."
" was run: "Database is mandatory on UserMailbox.".
The following error was generated when "$error.Clear();
if ($RoleIsDatacenter -ne $true)
if (Test-ExchangeServersWriteAccess -DomainController $RoleDomainController -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue)
$sysMbx = $null;
$name = "SystemMailbox{bb558c35-97f1-4cb9-8ff7-d53741dc928c}";
$dispName = "Microsoft Exchange";
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Retrieving mailboxes with Name=$name.");
$mbxs = @(Get-Mailbox -Arbitration -Filter {name -eq $name} -IgnoreDefaultScope -ResultSize 1 );
if ($mbxs.Length -eq 0)
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Retrieving mailbox databases on Server=$RoleFqdnOrName.");
$dbs = @(Get-MailboxDatabase -Server:$RoleFqdnOrName -DomainController $RoleDomainController);
if ($dbs.Length -ne 0)
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Retrieving users with Name=$name.");
$arbUsers = @(Get-User -Filter {name -eq $name} -IgnoreDefaultScope -ResultSize 1);
if ($arbUsers.Length -ne 0)
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Enabling mailbox $name.");
$sysMbx = Enable-Mailbox -Arbitration -Identity $arbUsers[0] -DisplayName $dispName -database $dbs[0
].Identity;
else
if ($mbxs[0].DisplayName -ne $dispName )
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Setting DisplayName=$dispName.");
Set-Mailbox -Arbitration -Identity $mbxs[0] -DisplayName $dispName -Force;
$sysMbx = $mbxs[0];
# Set the Organization Capabilities needed for this mailbox
if ($sysMbx -ne $null)
# We need 1 GB for uploading large OAB files to the organization mailbox
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Setting mailbox properties.");
set-mailbox -Arbitration -identity $sysMbx -UMGrammar:$true -OABGen:$true -GMGen:$true -ClientExtensions
:$true -MailRouting:$true -MaxSendSize 1GB -Force;
else
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info ("Cannot find arbitration mailbox with name=$name.");
else
Write-ExchangeSetupLog -Info "Skipping creating E15 System Mailbox because of insufficient permission."
" was run: "Database is mandatory on UserMailbox. Property Name: Database".
The Exchange Server setup operation didn't complete. More details can be found in ExchangeSetup.log located in the
<SystemDrive>:\ExchangeSetupLogs folder.
PS D:\>
I am cleaning out in ADSI and rebuilding the server for now, because the server is behaving oddly (not as oddly as it was with 6GiB, but oddly, nonetheless). I probably won't try to install Exchange again before tomorrow. What should I do to prevent
encountering the above again and/or if I encounter it again?

Mailbox Transport health state unhelathy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for