Maintaining Aspect Ratio and Quality

Hello FCE Guru's!
Yesterday while editing I noticed that my footage in FCE that I shot on a canon 7d was not as clear as the raw footage. When I adjusted my settings in FCE using the sequence settings tab, my project became smaller and seemed to regain its clarity.
But the problem is when I import any footage that wasn't already in the project the aspect ratio is bigger than what was in my project prior to adjusting the sequence settings? Even when I try and re-adjust the sequence settings the video stays small while new clips that I import are a lot larger????
So basically I have footage that is smaller than other footage, How do I keep all my footage the same size throughout the entire project?
I would like to know how I can fix this issue and what I did wrong to avoid in the future. I really hope this is something that is fixable as my project is 90% complete and the client is looking for a finished product by Friday. Please Help!
Thanks in advance.

Sorry,
Here is everything:
The footage that is in my timeline and saved to my project is: 1920x1080
*My Easy Setup settings are setup as*: AVCHD Apple Intermediate Codec 1920x1080i60 Format (all Format) Rates (all Rates)
*My sequence settings are setup as*: Apple Intermediate Codec 1920x1080i60
*The footage That I shot and trying to import reads exactl*y: 1920x1080 Apple Intermediate Codec, Integer (Big Endian)
*The issue is*: The Footage that I have in my timeline as well as in my project already seems to be a smaller than the footage that I am attempting to import into my project. The footage I want to import is Full Frame While the footage I already had in my project is smaller in my viewer.
Please let me know if you need any further information,
Thank You.

Similar Messages

  • Cropping in PS while Maintaining Aspect Ratio and DPI

    I shoot the Nikon D3, RAW (.NEF) and convert through ACR. Through ACR, the DPI is set to 300 DPI; the DPI caries over to Photoshop.
    I crop in Photoshop using the crop tool (not marquee). To maintain 2:3 or 3:2 aspect ratios, the crop tool requires the width and height in inches or pixels. If specifying resolution, the document size will crop to that DPI, if not; the DPI is derived from pixel dimensions.
    In my case, I’ve been cropping at 2in by 3in (or reverse for orientation). The resulting “real” image pixel dimensions are still very high (correct to crop size) but the document size reported in PS is 2in by 3in with a wildly high DPI. By changing the resolution back to 300 DPI through Photoshop, the document size returns to normal. Therefore the picture has not lost anything; it appears to only be a function of the Meta data. The pixel dimensions remain constant while the document size and DPI change.
    It apears that you canot specify an aspect ratio via the crop tool without defining it in inches or cm. You can do it with the marquee tool but the marquee tool sucks for cropping. You can however crop in ACR with the crop tool by merely specifying the aspect ratio (not in inches or cm). In summary, the PS crop tool is based in inches or cm while the ACR crop tool is simply aspect ratio.
    What I can do to crop in PS while maintaining aspect ratio and defined DPI. Is there a work-around, magic trick, or something else I can do to fool the PS crop tool into an aspect ratio not based in inches or cm?

    Just to summarize:
    Setting a dimensioned ratio (e.g., 2 in by 3 in for Width and Height) in the Crop tool without filling in a Resolution value yields a crop with the desired aspect ratio, and without any resampling.
    There is no way to specify a ratio with the crop tool, specifically, as the OP has requested, though in a future version perhaps specifying simple numbers there without any units might be a way Adobe could facilitate this.  It would be a nice addition and with little downside.
    I guess what I don't understand, though, is why the OP cares about the "high" resulting dpi value?  It's just a number.
    Expanding on this, the Resolution is nothing but a metadata value that can be changed at will (e.g., through Image - Image Size... - uncheck Resample) at any time in the future.  There is ALWAYS a Resolution value associated with the image, both before and after the crop (though the crop tool may end up changing it; so what?).  In short, the Resolution is just an arbitrary figure until such time as the user wants to use the image for a purpose (e.g. printing).
    Always think in terms of pixel dimensions (number of pixels horizontally and vertically) while editing, then think about dpi right before publishing.  It's hard to go wrong this way.
    -Noel

  • How to maintain aspect ratio?

    I want export a video in 2.35.1, but want to maintain aspect ratio(and get rid of the black bars).
    How can I do that in Compressor?
    I can only figure out how to compress it. But can’t find any options for maintaining aspect ratio.
    I know this can be done with QuickTime 7, but I don't have it.
    Currently using Compressor 4

    As mishmumken said, custom frame sizes can be
    Specified in Compressor Geometry.
    But I'm concerned that you may not have preserved the aspect ratio
    When you exported from your editor
    Here is a great tutorial that describes how to do that from FCPX.
    Http://library.creativecow.net/articles/payton_t/FCPX_Custom-Resolution-Timeline s/video-tutorial
    Russ

  • Resize flash movie while maintaining aspect ratio?

    Hey all,
    We have created an extremely content heavy .swf file (1900 x
    1400) for a presentation that runs full screen on a monitor at a
    screen resolution of 1900 x 1400. I think that was the
    resolution... I've been away from the project for a while and I
    can't remember. anyways....
    now we need to shrink the .swf down to a more reasonable size
    so that we can make a cd rom out of it. Probably needs to be shrunk
    to about 800 x 600. Is there an easy way to shrink the .swf in
    flash from 1900 x 1400 to 800 x 600 while maintaining aspect ratio
    and keeping all items on stage?
    I sure hope so! I'd hate to have to recreate the entire
    thing! It was a HUUUGE project with a ton of content.
    Thanks in advance for any help or suggestions!!!!

    Hey all.... I am just now working on this project.
    I've created my .fla file and I'm trying to load a .swf into
    an empty movie clip. It didn't scale down like I want it to and it
    was still appearing as the normal size file. So I added the
    container._height = 500; and container._width = 800; When I added
    the width and height the .swf inside the empty mc container
    disappeared!!!!! Any idea why???
    Here is my code:
    stop();
    this.createEmptyMovieClip("container",
    this.getNextHighestDepth());
    loadMovie("hlhuntyears.swf", container);
    container._width = 800;
    container._height = 500;
    container._x = 0;
    container._y = 0;
    I export it as an .exe since its going to be a cd rom and
    when I double click the .exe to run it I get a blank screen. But
    when I take out height and width it shows up but not to the correct
    scale. The original file (hlhuntyears.swf) is 1440 x 900 and when I
    run the .exe I can only see a tiny piece of it. Can anybody help??
    please??

  • Scaling  |  Zoom (i.e. "maintain aspect ratio, scale to fill and crop to remove outside boundary"

    Hi,
    I have a mismatch on the aspect ratio of my source and visual display region.  (And please just assume that I can not conform the visual display region to match the source's aspect ratio.)
    Flash's default gives me ""scale to fit" which maintains my source's aspect ratio but results in "letterboxing" black space.
    Does OSMF (or Flash) have a configurable property that will maintain aspect ratio, scale to fill and crop to remove outside boundary?  Or do I just have to code my own solution (e.g. using masking)?
    I have a diagram here:
    http://flexflashvideo.com/codesamples/2010/zoom_crop.png
    Thanks,
    g

    Have you tried with ScaleMode in OSMF?
         var layout:LayoutMetadata = new LayoutMetadata();
            video.addMetadata(LayoutMetadata.LAYOUT_NAMESPACE, layout);
       layout.scaleMode = ScaleMode.ZOOM;
    Ryan

  • Pasting from Illustrator to Photoshop doesn't maintain aspect ratio

    I have vector artwork that is not aligned to a pixel grid in Illustrator. In CS5, I would be able to paste the vector object as a smart object into Photoshop file that was larger than the illustrator image and resize larger while holding shift to keep the ratio the same.
    However with Creative Cloud, if I have a square in Illustrator that happens to be 17.3px by 17.3, then paste to Photoshop in a file that has a larger canvas than the paste, I get uneven horizontal and vertical ratios (width = 18; height = 17). It seems to overestimate the width and make it appear fatter horizontally (which is the wrong aspect ratio). This is very noticeable when vector objects (like perfect circles and small icons) get scaled up in Photoshop.
    I have tried unchecking and checking "Snap Vector Tools and transforms to Pixel Grid" but this doesn't seem to fix it.
    The only way I've been able to get this ratio to be kept is to create a new document with the size automatically changed to clipboard dimensions (which are the desired 17x17). When you paste as smart object, it now uses the correct aspect ratio.

    When you paste an object into Photoshop take a look at your options bar to see if the Maintain Aspect Ratio button is checked. I'm guessing that it isn't which is why Illustrator objects are being pasted at different heights and widths. As you can see in the image below, a perfect circle from Illustrator is being placed in Photoshop at 100.05% and 99.44%. By checking the link button between the two percentages the numbers get locked to the same percentage so that the object is pasted in at the correct dimensions.

  • Empathy Video Call Doesn't Maintain Aspect Ratio

    I'm using empathy 3.6.3-1 with gtalk, and I noticed that video calls don't seem to preserve aspect ratios. Does anyone else have this problem?

    When you paste an object into Photoshop take a look at your options bar to see if the Maintain Aspect Ratio button is checked. I'm guessing that it isn't which is why Illustrator objects are being pasted at different heights and widths. As you can see in the image below, a perfect circle from Illustrator is being placed in Photoshop at 100.05% and 99.44%. By checking the link button between the two percentages the numbers get locked to the same percentage so that the object is pasted in at the correct dimensions.

  • Maintain aspect ratio on panel re-size

    I think it would be valuable to have a panel attribute "Maintain aspect ratio on resize" that would apply to manual resizing (not maximizing) a panel.
    I know this is doable with panel callbacks and EVENT_PANEL_SIZE but a native solution that shows that constraint while dragging a corner would be better.
    And given the nature of many of our UIs I think this would often be used.
    Any comments before I submit a product suggestion?
    --Ian

    Since this is now a LabVIEW question, I would recommend to post it in the LabVIEW forum!
    The event structure has a "This VI...panel resize" event and you can probably use it to enforce a certain aspect ratio. 
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • Exporting for Web - maintaining aspect ratio

    I've been trying to export a 6 minute video as a Quicktime movie file which will be imported into Adobe Flash for use on the web. I've tried 3 or 4 codecs and all of them end up creating a 4:3 image where my source is 16:9. What codec would be best to use and maintain the original aspect ratio and still keep the video file a reasonable size to import into Flash.
    Thanks for the help
    Carl

    Ok, I misspoke when I used the term "codec". I did mean I had tried a variety of settings, none of which preserved my original 16:9 aspect ratio (and this, despite setting "preserve aspect ratio" in the mpeg-4 settings). So, I have experimented with a variety of settings to no avail. I'm sure there is something there - I was hoping someone had the same experience and could clue me in on what settings to use.
    thank you,
    Carl

  • How do I maintain aspect ratio of images in a replicator?

    I have these ai files from a company logo I want to use to build up a wall of the cross shapes seen in the screen shot. My problem is that I have not been able to figure out how to have the replicator maintain the square aspect ratio of the image.  What am I missing?
    Thanks,
    Drew

    The only time I've seen something like this is when the original file was saved with an aspect ratio and *non-square* pixels. Adobe applications (Photoshop is the one I know) have presets for video, like NTSC 720x480 in either 16:9 or 4:3 aspect.  Taking the 16:9 as an example, what should be 854x480 pixels is saved as 720x480 and the pixel widths are set to be interpreted as 1.21 times wider. In other applications, this will appear to be about 21% squeezed when viewed as square pixels.
    If this is the case, (or even *close* to the case) here's what you need to do:
    In the Layers list window - at the top -- click the media tab.
    Select the image/AI file.
    In the Inspector, click the Media tab (again...)
    Find the Pixel Aspect Ratio and select (most likely) NTSC D1/DV Anamorphic 
    Motion will automatically set the 1.21 aspect I was trying to explain at the top. If that doesn't work, select one of the other presets or Custom and type in your own aspect "correction" value.
    HTH

  • Maintaining aspect ratio when transforming

    Since I have upgraded to CS6 I've noticed that when transforming an object it does not maintain the aspect ratio even when I am holding shift while transforming. I have to each time check the link button (maintain aspect ratio)

    It'll be because 'Snap Vector Tools and Transforms to Pixel Grid' is enabled in 'Preferences > General', an option that didn't exist before CS6. It's actually being more truthful that way because the transformed layer has to become an integer number of pixels wide and tall, anyway, and that's not going to be a perfectly proportional scale in most cases.
    See what I mean by trying to scale an 11 x 10 pixels layer by 50%. It's impossible for that to be scaled by exactly 50% in width because the result has to be either 5 or 6 pixels wide (it will be 6). When the 'Snap...' preference is disabled (i.e. the pre-CS6 behaviour) you can scale the bounding box by precisely 50% in width but the pixels don't cover precisely 50% of the original width. When the preference is enabled, you won't be misled by being able to scale the bounding box to precisely 50% when the pixels cannot cover precisely 50%.

  • How do i transform a layer with maintain aspect ratio through scripting in Photoshop?

    Hi,
         How do i transform a layer with maintain aspect ratio through scripting in Photoshop? I am expecting your reply.
    thanks,
    Rajiv.s

    I don't think your talking apples to apples.  First I do not know of any Maintain Aspect Ratio icon in Photoshop. The only icon I think associated with transform is the anchor point icon in the option bar for transform. I think you may referring to the constrain check box in the image size dialog which you can check when resample is checked. Image size effect all layers in the document and the documents canvas size. The document canvas size will be changed to the values in the images size dialog and all layers will be transformed by percentage the canvas was changes while maintaining the layers position over the canvas and the layers I think may be cropped so only pixels over the canvas remain.
    I do not know if you know that layers can be any size and have aspect ratios different then the documents canvas.
    In your case it sounds like your describing a template that has a canvas size that is 2000px wide be 3000px high a 2:3 portrait aspect ratio.  Your image file has a landscape aspect. If you place that image into your template place would by default transform the image so the image would fit within the 2000px by 3000px canvas size there would be a white border top and bottom.  You could transform that smart object layer to it actual pixels size activeDocument.activeLayer.resize(100,100, AnchorPosition.MIDDLECENTER); then calculate the size you want to transform its height to. By retrieving the canvas size and the layers boundaries. Divide the canvas height pixel size by the layers pixel height size should give you the percentage you need to use. Make sure you set the ruler units to pixels so your working with pixel values for the canvas and layer size values. The resulting layer will be larger then canvas size keeping the anchor point centered will result in the canvas size masking off both sides.  In effect cropping you landscape to a portrait.  Note cropping a image from one orientation to the other changes the composition drastically.
    If your trying to make a composit like collage you may want to look at my Photoshop Collage Toolkit it will fit images to fill a 2000px by 3000px area http://www.mouseprints.net/old/dpr/PhotoCollageToolkit.html
    You could also do centered 2:3 crop that is resized to a 3000px

  • Pixel Aspect Ratio and ciphering type of footage-CS6

    CS6- updated 12\18\13  V-11.03
    Hi All,
    A few questions about:
    Pixel Aspect Ratio and ciphering type of footage. Bare with me as I touch on two different aspects of what I feel are related:
    1. Setting up a Comp-
    Having AE decide on the correct footage being used- Via >Import footage,.(to Folder) then drag it on, or into the 'make comp icon' where AE is supposed to do a 'best guess' for the comp settings. Be it square pix or otherwise. What are the second value in brackets ? See pic
    2. Interpolation-
    When using two diff footage sources- If using two different source footages in a comp. Is this where I should interplolate my footage to match the existing footage and the comp settings (If I have choosen NOT to pre-comp that secondary footage?)
    3. Seperating fields-
    How come footage that a camera manufacturer claims to be shooting in Progressive 30 or 24p is showing up as interlaced in my comp's CP? The manual to the cam says 30p or 24p or 60i The footage was shot at 30p (for sure)
    Here is a screen grab of AE's 'best guess' of that footage, showing it with an UPPER field render; indicative of HD Interlaced footage and then in the inerpolate settings - 'kinda confirming it.
    Now for the way out- Render:
    4. If that is in fact Interlaced and I then want to reduce the size of that 1920 footage to 66% size... Do I need to do anything in particular at this point?
    For some reason I am getting an error on my end when trying to export as an AVI and reducing size to 1280
    5. Is this from the Field render of interlaced challenge?
    I ended  up with a couple of errors and then aborted the whole file and re-imported to start over with this error. Which happend again after a redoux
    So I sent it over to Prem Pro to export those MTS Files as a movie and noted AGAIN the reference to Interlaced video. "upper and lower" Prem Pro was able to use the same MTS files and export a working movie. (so those files were not corrupt BTW) Yet Note PP's output reference to that footage again as Interlaced would be...
    Thanks for any clarity on those "5" questions... NC

    Thanks for the details Rick. 
    Thanks for the insight on  #1
    Ref #2, You should never change the interpretation of Pixel aspect ratio on footage  unless you know for a certainty that it is wrong. For example, open Photoshop or Illustrator and create a new document that is 720  X 480 pixels and AE will always interpret the image as rectangular pixels because that is a standard rectangular pixel frame size.
    Unless you specifically created the image in Photoshop with rectangular pixels it is square pixels so the interpretation must be changed to avoid distortion.
    --Did you mean to write:
    Unless you specifically created the image in Photoshop with SQUARE pixels using  a rectangle layout?  I am not trying to bust your blz here, I am trying to understand the unknown. (for me)
    So it may very well be AE mis-guessing the footage and the Upper first is a mistake on AE's part and I need to test it to find out? On that note...
    Ref#3, Separating fields must be done right. Some 1080P footage is interpreted as having fields. This may be incorrect and if there is a question you MUST test the footage. Test the footage by making sure that the fields are being separated
    How do I make sure the fields are being seperated? Does the window as in pic two from the top of my post confirm that or is there another test?
    Then I do the following:
    then selecting the footage in the project panel and choosing Create Composition from Selection, then opening the Composition settings, doubling the frame rate and stepping through the footage a frame at a time. If the footage is really interlaced then each of the frames will be different.  (IE:  29.94 to 59.94fps) OK
    If the field order is reversed then motion will be in the right direction then reverse, then go back to the right direction. ---I did not understand?  Are you referring to Upper and Lower reverse?   Direction, as in fwd and back in Time line? Sorry unlclear on my end...
    Oh and HFR footage? HFR? High frame rate??
    One last thing, Do all cameras shoot anamorphic, or could they as AE is showing my MTS files; are Square? (1.00) Pic #1
    @Dave-  You -
    At 1080, a lot of footage is interlaced, and evidently your camera made interlaced footage
    Me- How do you know? because of the 2nd pic and upper field first indication?
    You-Even if you know for a fact that it was shot 30p, the camera captures the entire frame... but it records it as two fields. They give it a fancy name: Progressive Segmented Frame. 
    Me- Is this typical false advertisement of the sales divison of brands like not telling you what CMOS or CCD is in a cam just slapping HD 1080p on the side of the box?
    You-AE will treat it as an entire frame if you interpret it as having a field order of None.
    Me- Won't that be a problem mis leading AE on an interpret?
    Thanks Gents for the precise details.
    Best
    NC

  • How do I control aspect ratio and pixel dimension in iMovie 10

    When you created a new movie in iMovie 9 the program would ask if you wanted 4:3 or 16:9 aspect ratio and when you saved the movie it would ask about the size of the file and pixel dimensions.  How do I controll these in iMovie 10?

    I think they screwed up - but I have solved the problem by deleting it and reinstalling version 9.0.9 which you can get from the support at http://www.apple.com/uk/support/mac-apps/imovie/
    Frankly I don't see the point of Theatre and I don't use iCloud so reverting back to a version that actually works seemed a good option!

  • What is the aspect ratio and fps for video in Connect 9?

    I'm trying to find any definitive details on the aspect ratio and fps supported by Connect 9.  It is well documented for 8 that it was 640x480 at 20 fps.  Is that the same for 9?  Or has that improved?

    The supported resolution and frame rates for video in the Video pod have not changed with Connect 9.

Maybe you are looking for