Maintaining Documents in plant level

Daer Folks,
Is there any possibility maintaining document at plant level without using LAB/OFFICE ? we have WERK(Plant) field in DRAW table but we are not assigning plant anywhere while creating document. is there any work around so that we can make use of plant field of DRAW to tale to restrict our document at plant level.
Bhuwan Tiwari

Hi,
regarding the field 'Plant' I have to inform you that this could not be filled duing the document creation process via transaction CV01N or the BAPI. So I would recommend you to use the field 'authorization group' for your requirement. This field can be filled with a specific value for each plant.
As soon as this field is filled you can define an authorization concept which only allows user to enter documents which have only a specific value in this field and so restrict all other user from entering. For further information on all existing authorization objects for DMS and also regarding the field Authorization Group please see the following link too:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/AuthorizationObjectsin+DMS
Best regards,
Christoph

Similar Messages

In future batches are maintained in plant level

dear all,
when i am doing MB1A ,MB1B,MB1C after i save the document there is a message saying that in future the batches are maintained at plant level. I am not getting the document generated number. because of this i am unable to find whether the document generated or not. how to overcome this
regards
anup

Some one has most likley changed the batch level.
Please go to transaction OMCT and have a look around there to figure what has gone on
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/25/283aac4f7811d18a150000e816ae6e/frameset.htm
That will explain this transaction and settings in this,.
Edited by: Adeel Sarwar on Sep 18, 2008 10:04 AM

Program/User exit to maintain the number ranges at plant level

Hi Everybody,
Could u please tell me program/user exit to maintain the number ranges at plant level.
Thanks & Regards,
Piyush

Hi
Do you want to maintain all the number range Objects
For Material Master you can use the enhancement MGA00002
For PO Nu,ber ranges you can use the enhancement MM06E003
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Restrict purchase order document type at plant level

Dear,
I would like to restrict the purchase order document type at plant level,
Plz help me.

Hi Dear,
             at the Plant level you have to use the below given Authorization Objects for the Users in different Plant
M_BEST_BSA     Document Type in Purchase Order
M_BEST_WRK     Plant in Purchase Order
Give the values of the respective Plant and Order Type for the Respective Users.
For more help you can contact your Security Team.
but before that please check out in the T-Code SU24, if both the Objects are active, if not then ask the ABAP person to activate them.
Hope it helps you.
regards,
yawar Khan

Payment Terms fetch Issue(Plant Level) @ SRM 7.0

Hello Experts,
We are currently implementing SRM 7.0 system(Classical Scenario) across regions.In one such scenario we found out that when we create a PO directly in SRM the Payment Terms is fetched correctly from the Vendor Master at Plant Level(Bypassing the Purch Org Level data, since Standard SAP looks for plant specific data & the same has been implemented in SRM by enahancing the BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI (Implementation ZBBP_DOC_CHANGE_PO ,Method :- BBP_PO_CHANGE using a Custom FM with SQL Query on LFM2)
However when a PO is ordered via the Shopping Cart method,the payment term is fetched at Purch org level,even though we have an Alternative Data(at Plant level) in R/3.
The Header & Item Level Data are the same.for both the PO's. Can someone please give some pointers on fixing this issue.As we know from SAP,fetching Plant related Payment Term into SRM is not a SAP Standard Feature & thus a custom logic was implemented.Payment Term Table(BBP_PAYTERM) is updated with the latest data with all Payment Term translations maintained in R/3.
Awaiting your suggestions.
Thanks,
Arnab Sinha
Shanghai,China

Dear Poster,
As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
Best Regards,
SDN SRM Moderation Team

MCHB,MARD - Stock available at plant level and storage location level

Hi ,
How to determine how much stock available at Storage location level and Plant level. (Lot is not maintained).
In MCHB-Stock at lot level is shown.
In MARD-Stock at Storage Location level is shown lncluding
the stock maintaned at the lot level.
If i want to know the stock which is not maintained in Lot, i.e, Stocks directly maintained at Storage location / Plant.
Do I need to subtract the MCHB Value from MARD Value ?
Is there any other way available to find the stocks which is not maintained at lot level.
Regards
Prasath

Hi prashant,
What do u mean by stock maintained at SL level without batch level. Do u mean that some materials are subjected to batch management and some or not?
If that is the case, for all batch managed materials, u can see the stock at batch level and also same is summed up at SL level. But still what ever u are getting from MARD table isstock at SL level only.
If u have activated batch management for any material, it will always be shown at lot level also.
hope this clarfifies query
award points if found useful

Seperate Inco Terms on at Plant level

Hi
I am new to this forum and I need your help to find out if there are any quick solution to my below issue. Our business has a requirement where there would be a new plant rolled-out under the same company code but having a different delivery address so for any external purchasing from Vendors, they are suggesting we have a new Purchase Organisation in order to in-corporate a seperate Inco-terms so it would appear on the PO print. I am not sure if this is the correct solution as because that would be lot of work in terms of Master data creation, etc. Instead I proposed we could maintain Inco-terms at Plant level in the PIR's so that would be picked on the PO output. But since we also have A/c assigned PO's and other Service items for which there are no PIR's, how can we handle this situation? Obviously for these orders, the Inco terms are getting picked from the Vendor Master. And I am sure this is not a unique problem as anyone will have the same issue!!
Could you please tell me if there is any better solution or any user exit which solely handle these type of situations? We are on ECC 6.0 btw.
Thanks in advance
Cath

Hi Ajit / Jurgen
Your valuable answers pointed me to the right direction, many thanks for that!! When we wish to raise a PO with A/C assignment (free text items) or for service items, the concept of Inco terms does not arise. So in these cases, the Alternative data in the Purchasing view of Vendor Master really helps to have different sets of data with the plant combinations. So when I maintained different Inco terms for two seperate plants for the same Vendor (even though he is with different Company Codes!), I could able to create two PO's with outputs showing different Inco terms. So this test proves what I am aiming for and clear any confusions (I am talking about me
Thanks once again guys
Cath

JDBC Receiver: FATAL ERROR document format: invalid level 4

Hi,
I am creating an IDOC -JDBC scenario .
The XML created has action as delete.
but in the comminication channel i am getting an error which is
Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'T_SAP_WBS' (structure 'statement1'): java.sql.SQLException: FATAL ERROR document format: invalid level 4' found (structure 'statement1')
does any one have any idea on this?
Regards,
Tarun Bahal

Hi,
The JDBC format which you are using is incorrect.....please maintain the format as mentioned in this document...there seems to be some mismatch
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2e/96fd3f2d14e869e10000000a155106/content.htm
By maintaining the format i mean:
1) maintain the hierarchy as mentioned in the link
2) maintain the case (upper/ lower) for the standard elements (you seem to be using statement1 instead of Statement)
3) If there are no multiple stattements then have the name as Statement
If still facing the problem....provide your structure in sdn
Regards,
Abhishek.

Plant level authorization in DMS

Hi Gurus,
My client needs to control the document access by plant level.
In CV01N, 02N, 03N & 04N.
Is there any way to control the same document type aginst different plant.

Hi,
I would say that the best way would be to implement the BADI DOCUMENT_AUTH01 to create a special authorization check on the desired field values.
So this check should work to restrict specific users on entering document info records.
Best regards,
Christoph
P.S.: Please reward points for useful information.

Identification of old material number at plant level

Dear All,
We are implementing SAP for two hospitals. In legacy system each hospital as its own material master and material number. Now in SAP each hospital we are treating as a plant. These two plants are assigned to one company code.
So it means that there will be one unique material number for two hospitals. Now business wants their old material number (which is maintained differently for two Hospitals) at plant level in search functionality
How can I achieve with material master
Regards
Subhash

create a class "OLDMAT" for old material number with CL03 for class type 001
define a characteristic for old material number for each plant with CT04 and assign it to the class (can as well be done from within CL03). name it e.g. OLDMXXXX (XXXX = plant number)
in MM01 select classification view and add the class. after you hit enter you get the fields to add the old material numbers
Standard F4 help for a material number allows then to search for a material number by classification.

Vendor Evaluation in plant level

Hi there ,
Can we do the vendor evaluation in plant level.......because as per my observation we can do the same in Purchasing organization level only......
Please sugest me
Thanks & Regards
Kaushik

No you can not because vendor are maintained at Pur org level and the evaluation take place at that level but you can view the plant level eveluation
Run ME63 after ME61 and display the all log
then Run ME6H with vendor and plant and you will see the list plant wise evaluation

Info record mandatory at plant level

We want to restrict info record mandatory at a plant level out of many plants.
i could make it mandatory and price not editable in the po, but while creating sched agreement it does allow the changing the prices.
Pl help.
Haresh

Hi,
Either goto spro>MM>Procurement>Environment Data>Define attributes of system messages and make 06/341 as Error or Warning, as required.
Or
Make source list mandatory in material master.
Or
Source List mandatory at plant in Source List config.
Or
Remove the pricing condition PBXX from your prcing that means you will have only PB00 (Gross price) condition in your PO which is determine the gross price from Info or contract or SA or RFQ but can't allow user to enter the price at PO level w/o any source document
Or
Customer exit MM06E005-EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
Regards,
Ashish.

Changing Batch Level from Material Level to Plant Level.

I want to create the batch class with the class code 22 instead of 23. As the batch class is maintained at the Material Level, not at the Plant Level. So is it possible to change the batch class from Material to Plant Level and create batch class with code 22.
Kindly suggest.

Hi, Thanks for ur reply.
I have applied SAP notes and changed the batch status from material level to plant level...But still i am getting the class type as 23.
What are the next steps to be done. Currently in OMCT, Batch Level Conversion tab is active and rest all the tabs are in inactive state. so please guide.

Account determination at plant level

Hi All,
There is a requirement: we have 1 cocode and 10 plants are assigned to it. Valuation is to be at plant level.
There are around 15 valuation classes. While doing config for account determination, do i need to assign each combn of valuation modifier and valuation class to a different GL account for stock postings i.e. BSX ?
Thanks
Ritu
Edited by: ritu on Dec 24, 2007 8:12 AM

Hi Ritu
G/L accounts will differenciate the accounts which u procure the matls. If u maintain the same G/L account for all valuation class, for all types of materials system wil show same gl account .This will confuse the accounts person. u should differentiate the matls.
Mainthing is gl accounts to be defined by accounts people based on business process.
For ex: If u maintain same gl accounts for raw matl and finished goods, accounts guy wants to check the price that how much raw matl consumed on this month. what he wil do he will check based on gl account.
if u use "transxn event key" or "general modifier" you r more specifying the gl accounts for ur business transactions.
Finally if u want to differentiate accounts u have to maintain different gl account.
In ur case maintain one valuation grouping code for all plants and assign to ur company code and ur chart of account.
Maintain different gl account for ur valuation class and ur valuation grouping code.
For any clarification plse rewert back.
reward if useful.
Regards
Viru

Partner determination at plant level

at present we are having partner determination at p.org level and plant level.
In our business we have a one vendor with 2 ordering addresses for 2 of our plants.
we had maintained these ordering address at vendor master --plant level.
when we are creating manual PO system is picking up the order address where as when we are creating automatic PO using ME59N transaction system is picking partner function maintained at p.org level rather than maintained at plant level.
plz suggest the solution.

Hi,
Check the intial requriment are there r not like source list before craeting the PO.
Check whether the Partner function are maintained at plant level in XK03 in partner fuctions selection field and also check whether you had ticked the data revel at plant level allowed.
Hope this will hep you.
BR,
Patil

Maintaining Documents in plant level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for