Maintaining image quality in FrameMaker and RoboHelp
Can someone tell me how I can maintain image quality in my Word documents in FrameMaker 11 while importing the documents into RoboHelp 10? Basically, I will be importing Word (help) documents into FrameMaker 11 (hoping to maintain the image quality) then importing those documents in FM to RoboHelp 10 to publish. Please help.
Well, we have tried multiple times to import our Word files directly into RH in which the images were not satisfactory. So after going round and round with this...FrameMaker was introduces as a way to solve our image concerns. However, I do agree with you...it is very cumbersome. I just want to keep the higher ups pleased.
Similar Messages
-
Importing Captivate movies into FrameMaker and RoboHelp
Does anyone know where I would find step-by-step instructions
on how to integrate Captivate movies into FrameMaker and
RoboHelp?Hi Jay
See if the links below help any.
Link
number one
Link
number two
Cheers... Rick -
Image quality for background and screen saver
Hi
I have recently upgraded to Aperture 2.1. To take advantage of the additional/improved RAW image features, I have been migrating my older images from their original 1.1 RAW fine tuning to 2.0. However, after migrating most of my library (over 10k images) I have noticed that images using 2.0 have dramatically lost their sharpness when on the background & screen saver display. I have a 30" HD Apple Cinema Display, and the images look fine within Aperture itself. I've looked through the menus on System Preferences and Aperture Preferences but can't see anything obvious that would be causing this lack of quality.
If anyone knows how to solve this I would be extremely grateful - I take a lot of photos, and usually have my most recent images on the screen saver as it helps me to evaluate them prior to culling!
Kind Regards
VinnyHi Ian
Thank you for the welcome and advice. I had a look in the preferences for Previews and the settings were not as high as they could be. I have adjusted them to the highest, and also unticked 'use camera jpeg when possible'. This has made a difference.
Thanks again.
Vinny -
JPEG - maintaining image quality
Do JPEG images degrade each time that you them in photoshop, change the color space and save them.
Example: I receive a JPEG orignal file, change the size of the image and rename the original and save-as. A month later I open this new file and convert it to CMYK. Has the quality of the image degraded with these changes?
I will be using the images for large format printing and want the best quality.A jpeg degrades every time it is resaved, yes. It makes no difference what you do before the save, it's the save itself that does the damage.
You can usually get away with one or two resaves, but it's good practice to avoid it altogether. If you receive a jpeg, resave it to tiff or psd immediately.
Edit: cross post -
Training Videos - Adobe Technical Communication Suite, FrameMaker and RoboHelp
Adobe Senior Product Evangelist, RJ Jácquez, has created
three On Demand training videos to help customers get started with
Adobe Technical Communication Suite. Please see the details below-
NEW Training Video! Getting Started with the Technical
Communication Suite: Part 1 (
http://my.adobe.acrobat.com/p29205929/)
In Part 1, you will learn about leveraging live and
interactive 3D models from virtual any CAD/CAM/CAE software in your
technical and instructional documents using the Adobe Technical
Communication Suite.
NEW Training Video! Getting Started with the Technical
Communication Suite: Part 2 (
http://my.adobe.acrobat.com/p25426010/)
In Part 2, you will learn how to supplement your technical
and instructional design documents with engaging Adobe Captivate
demonstrations, simulations and quizzes in the Flash format using
the Adobe Technical Communication Suite.
NEW Training Video! Getting Started with the Technical
Communication Suite: Part 3 (
http://my.adobe.acrobat.com/p13101233/)
In Part 3, you will learn about adding FrameMaker books and
documents in RoboHelp as live links and reusing FrameMaker content
for creating Online Help systems, Searchable Knowledge bases,
Performance Support systems and even Policies and Procedures. Just
like the first two, the exercise files are also included in case
you want to go over the integration features yourself.
Besides Adobe Technical Communication Suite, there are
training videos for Adobe FrameMaker 8 (
http://www.adobe.com/support/documentation/en/framemaker/#tutorials)
and Adobe RoboHelp 7 (
http://www.adobe.com/support/documentation/en/robohelp/#tutorials)
available on Adobe Help Resource Center.Posting the links again -
NEW Training Video! Getting Started with the Technical
Communication Suite: Part 1
http://my.adobe.acrobat.com/p29205929/
NEW Training Video! Getting Started with the Technical
Communication Suite: Part 2
http://my.adobe.acrobat.com/p25426010/
NEW Training Video! Getting Started with the Technical
Communication Suite: Part 3
http://my.adobe.acrobat.com/p13101233/ -
How to maintain image quality?
Hi, what happens is that when I import an image (Object Library -> Image -> click Image -> URL -> pick my image file) the image gets resiszed to a bigger size.
I mean, I design something in Illustrator, I export the work as PNG, I check the output, it looks ok. I import the image into Designer, I preview the page, and it is pixealted or blurry because of the resize. (I'm sure it is a resize problem because I compare both images and one is obviously bigger than the other, like a 20-25% I guess).
I've heard that this happens because Designer only works in 72dpi, but, is there any workaround?.
Thanks.Remember that Premiere's program monitor shows the images as video. If your sequence is interlaced, the program monitor may be displaying every other trace (this is a display option as I recall).
What does it look like when exported and viewed on a TV.
Did the image size on import match the sequence parameters? if your image in Lightroom was say 6 x 4 inches and the resultion set to 72 dpi, the pixel dimensions are 432 x 288. If you expecting this to fill a 1920 x 1081 sequence, you are going to see degradation as Premier Pro scales it up to fill the image.
It important to remember the difference in mission of lightroom and premiere. Premiere doesn't give a hoot what the dpi is--it only cares what the pixel dimensions are.
Best approach is to do all scaling in photoshop by cropping the image to the pixel size, e.g. 1920 x 1080. In the crop tool set a fixed height and width "1920 px" by "1080 px" ===the dpi is irrelevant to premiere pro.
Before cropping check the general preferences in photoshop to ensure you have the best scaling algorithm depending on whether you scaling up or down. -
How to maintain video quality after resizing?
I have a 640 x 360 px video that I want to resize to fit a 480 x 270 px flash movie. When I resize the video to fit the smaller stage the image quality suffers, it looks like low res. When I crop to fit, it looks fine. Is there a way to maintain image quality when reducing size?
link to file: http://www.moongraf.com/flashvideo.htmlI have nothing on this computer aside from Adobe and a few other audio apps. This is a dual Xeon 6GB system. I work in IT and am MS certified. I do not think it is the system. I am using AE CS6. =A0Keyboard is set to its defaults. I do not touch the keyboard mappings. The effect brings the clip down to 10% or so. How should it be resized? SHift - click and drag works in all of my apps like Photoshop, so it isnt the kb or the system. Is that the way it is supposed to be done in AE? If you have AE, are you able to try this to see what I mean?
-
I am creating simple drawings in Power Point and them saving them as png or jpg files.
I then bring the drawing into Flash using import to stage.
The imported drawings lose some quality (e.g. straight lines appear jagged).
Any way to maintain image quality when importing images into Flash.
BobThis might help. Right click the image in the library, select Properties, and select the option to allow smoothing.
-
IPhoto vs Aperture uploaded image quality to Mobile Me
I realize this may have been discussed, but by my tests the exact same album loaded up to Mobile Me gallery via iPhoto looks better than Aperture...how can this be? I searched for topics about image quality and Mobile Me and found many complaints but little in the way of solutions. While, for me, this seems to be a solution, it is sad that my "pro" app is doing a worse job than a "consumer" app, not to mention the additional importing needed to use iPhoto. And this is v7.1.5 of iPhoto. Anyone have any other solutions for image quality involving Aperture and Mobile Me galleries? Thanks.
So the album finished uploading and the difference is amazing! I was very hesitant to send a link to my client after Aperture had uploaded the album...the images were that soft. But the iPhoto, while still a touch soft look 10X's better. Same album...just different programs used to upload to Mobile Me gallery. I'm not sure what is going on with Aperture, but Apple really needs to figure it out.
-
Should I See 2012 Process Image Quality Improvements? Plus Minor Display Buglet.
Having played around with the Camera Raw 6.7 Release Candidate, and switching back and forth between the 2010 and 2012 processes (the latter only offering limited main panel adjustments), I'm left to wonder...
Question:
I really didn't see any discernable differences in Image Quality between 2010 and 2012.
Should I have expected any? If so, are there special places I should look?
Or is 2012 just all about control simplification, which doesn't apply to ACR 6.7? Keep in mind I don't use LR so I don't know what that simplification might be; I'm just going on what I heard.
The CA correction improvements appear to apply equally to 2010 and 2012 processes.
Buglet:
The one other thing I noted was that when you hover over the little warning icon on the image it puts up the message "Update to Current Process (2010)", which is a bit wrong given that it's actually a downdate to an older process. Maybe the wording should be different if it's the 2012 process? Something like "Change to Process (2010)"?
-NoelRobin, Adobe adds functionality to Camera Raw in each new major Photoshop release. PV2012 is likely going to be touted as a new Photoshop CS6 feature.
I'm sure their Marketeers believe that if the team made Process 2012 fully available and controllable in Camera Raw 6 for Photoshop CS5 that some people would avoid buying Photoshop CS6.
On the other hand, they couldn't very well just leave the new release of Lightroom completely incompatible with the latest version of Photoshop...
What they've done makes them compatible because if you set a bunch of controls in Lightroom, then try to open the image in Photoshop CS5, you'll find that it will generate the same result. If they didn't add at least this much PV2012 support then they'd be getting bona fide complaints from Lightroom users that the new version isn't compatible with any version of Photoshop - which I guess is a major selling feature.
Seems more easily solved by just waiting until Photoshop CS6 is released, but I suppose this decouples the two just enough, and allows Adobe not to miss out on all the Lightroom sales.
A parting observation: Camera Raw 6.7 isn't actually released, so the majority of Photoshop users know nothing about it whatsoever. But a Lightroom user has the option of upgrading to 6.7 RC to solve his "incompatibility" problem. I wonder if Camera Raw 6.7 is actually going to release before Photoshop CS6...
-Noel -
I'm attempting to create online help sourced from a FrameMaker 10 book using Robohelp 9 and Web Help (primary layout).
The text is interspersed with numeorus small icons which, in the FrameMaker documents, are .bmp images inserted into anchored frames in the lines of text.
Most of these icons were imported by reference into the FrameMaker book's chapters. Some were copied from another FrameMaker book and pasted into the present book.
Many of these images are turning out blank in the finished Help project.
Robohelp seems to convert these images into JPEGS.
In the source FrameMaker book, the images which appear OK in the Help project have Object Properties including: Facets: FrameVector JPEG ... Referenced File: No File
The images which appear blank have different object properties there: Facets: DIB ... Referenced File: (address of the image's source file)
How can I fix this and make all of the images appear in the Online Help?Sorry, Jeff. I missed the key word in your instructions. Well, I did the import and still no luck. I'm getting the exact same results with the same images. (In some cases, I'm even getting hidden conditional text from the FM document body showing up in the image's frame instead of the image! See below.) This is bizarre behavior, but it's not new with the import. It is happening both in the linked and imported WebHelp with the same exact images. (Just another piece to complicate the puzzle.) So we have some jpeg images that are blank, and a few that are glitchy. From what I can tell, the commonality, besides the fact that all these new images are in jpeg format instead of gif format, is that all the blank and glitchy images are in a text inset. I'm beginning to think maybe RH just doesn't support text insets at all.
Arnis, I'll have to ask my colleague how she created the images next week when she's back from vacation. I have no clue if there are any differences between the jpegs and why some are showing up correctly. What do you mean by "compression type or level?" Are you asking about the resolution (high, medium, low) she chose when saving the images, or which program she used to do the screen capture and editing? (We have Adobe Photoshop CS5 and FM 11).
My next step is to copy-paste all the content from the text insets into my FM document (in the book I am linking) and re-render to see if that solves the problem. It will make single-sourcing impossible because I'll have to copy-paste the new content and images my colleague creates into my document each time we do an update, but oh well.
Here is an example of a glitchy image in RH:
And here is what it looks like in FM:
So bizarre! -
Controlling Image Conversion quality from Word to RoboHelp 8
I cannot find settings that will control image quality when converting Word documents to online help files by means of RoboHelp.
My problem is that screen captures, which were inserted as PNG or bitmaps, are reproduced with what looks like GIF or JPEG quality in the online help. I want better quality.
I read that for Famemaker, there are image conversion settings that enable one to preserve full, lossless (screen) resolution during the conversion.
Is there a way to do this for conversion from Word 2007 documents to RoboHelp 8?
If not, perhaps RoboHelp 9?
Much obliged.I am importing the Word documents into RoboHelp HTML version 7.0. I did the following experiment:
I imported a document with images containing vector text (the images are in Microsoft Office Object format) from Word 2007 to RoboHelp HTML 7.0, I got poor quality (badly formed text / aliasing). I presume this comes from the rendering and compression performed by the import function. I also saw JPEG artifacts in the raster (screen captures) images of the kind visible at very high compression ratios and which were not visible in the original.
When I insert the very same images, saved as PNG format at screen resolution, directly into RoboHelp HTML 7.0, I get good quality.
It seems that the Import from Word function is rendering and converting the images to a compressed format without preserving sufficient quality.
My questions are:
Is there a preferred format for the embedded images in Word for better import to RoboHelp, especially when the images contain (vector) text?
Are there accessible configuration parameters for the Import from Word function, that can control the rendering, and/or the quality level of JPEG compression, and/or give a choice between compressed and uncompressed images.
How can I access those parameters?
Thanks! -
Enlarging a .Mov file and maintaining the quality
a client wants me to use a .Mov file that is only 224 x 128.
Is there a way to increase the size and maintain the quality because when I do it it looks like an awful mush
thanksNo.
What you have is what you have.
There's no way to recover the information that was lost by reducing the image to that size. -
I am using the Firefox 3.6.3 version with my new Windows 7 operating system. When I used all the previous Firefox versions in my XP and Vista operating systems, image quality and resolution was excellent! However, now that I have upgraded to Windows 7 and Firefox 3.6.3, the image quality and resolution is poor (unacceptable for downloading purposes).
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== I first activated my new computer and installed the Firefox 3.6.3.All my images are pixelated in firefox 3.6.3
http://www.dcgdcreative.com
Not only on my site but on most sites I view.
The issue is not solved by resetting the zoom text view (ctrl+0)
The issue is not resolved by starting in safemode with add-ons disabled
The problem seems to only affect .jpeg files and only on Windows 7 on my desktop; as I have viewed several sites using windows XP with my laptop, no issues.
I had the same issue with IE8 and was able to fix the problem with by setting up the compatibility view for all sites. Issue fixed no problems at all. But nothing similar for firefox?
Whats the deal? -
I want to make a DVD of a slide-show with an audio track behind the photographs. I have carefully followed the iDVD video tutorials but the result is far from satisfactory. The quality of the images on the resulting DVD are blurred and indistict although the original photographs are of a very high quality. Where am I going wrong? Would I have better results from a different program than the inbuilt iDVD and if so so what programs have others found to be better? I should be grateful for some expert guidance.
Hey Falcopebo,
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
Looks like you have image quality issues when using iDVD to burn.
iDVD 7.0: Burned DVD has interlacing, pixelation, or image quality issues
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4078
A standard DVD made by iDVD is made to the standard DVD resolution of 720 X 480, which is smaller than most HDTVs and monitors. When expanded to fit the entire screen or monitor, the image will distort slightly due to upscaling to fit the screen or monitor.
Have a nice day,
Mario
Maybe you are looking for
-
Js-error while executing Multiple Image Upload wizard
If i want to save the configured window of Multiple Image Upload with Save to Database wizard i get this js-error: "While executing onClick in MIUploadWSaveWizard.htm, a JavaScript error occured". can someone help? thanx peter
-
Ejb 3.0 with List as parameter
Hello, I have deployed an ejb to a weblogic 10.0 server. The method has a list as parameter. public void testMethod(List<String> strings){ When I call this remotely i get the following exception: javax.ejb.EJBException: nested exception is: java.rmi.
-
I continue to get the message to auhorize my computer but every time I say yes it continues to ask me the same question. What do I do?
-
HAI, MM-GURUS, PL SOLVE THIS PROBLEM ON QUOTA ARRAGNEMENT I CREATED ONE MATERIAL EX: M1 TWO VENDORS : EX: V1, V2 CREATED INFO RECORD FOR TWO VENDORS CREAED SOURCE LIST FOR TWO VENDORS WITH MATERIAL CREATED QUOTA ARRANGEMENT IN MEQ1 FOR
-
Arsenic free glass in laptops? What exactly does it mean?
Apple announces that its laptops use arsenic free glass. What is the difference in comparison with the other, conventional glass? That is, what +amount of arsenic (per computer)+ is eliminated in Apple laptops compared to laptops built with the conve