Maintaining Infotypes in PP01 for Central Person while already maintained n

Dear Team,
When we are using PP01 Transaction code by taking Object type Central Person system is showing is showing IT0001, IT0002, IT0006 and IT0009 etc. Please let us know the purpose of using all these infotypes as we have already maintained the same in PA30 u2013 Maintain master data
Could you please suggest us whether to update these infotypes here or not and what are implication of the same if we maintain them again here?
Kind Regards
Nagesh

Hi,
When you enter central person and click to see data it takes you to PA30 infotypes and this shows that there is CP-P relation and tells you that link exists from OM to PA for same.
It is sufficient to maintain infotypes in PA30 only as this just shows you linkage nothing more.
Thanks,
Ameet

Similar Messages

Trex - Certain objects not found for Central Persons (CP)

Hi all,
In our soultion we use HRTMC_SEARCH application to search for certain persons.
For a specific person, we have set 3 aspirations. However, if we now search for persons with these aspirations, we cannot find them.
This is why I started looking into trex configuration
First thing I noticed in TREXADMIN is that the last indexation is done in 2013 for following query hrtmc_centralperson~aspirations
However if I go to esh_cockpit, I get the following
I tried updating HRTMC Central Person (Search Object Connector) but nothing changes
I also tried to use SES_ADMIN to recreate index but can't find the business object used for central persons
Can anyone help ?
Thnx !

Hi Mikhail,
We have detected a few problems.
If we use the talent profile search scenario, it goes to the class CL_ESH_IF_SEARCH_REQUEST and uses method SEARH.
However, if we go to scenario ESH_SEARCH_RESULTS_UI it uses method SEARCH_FEDERATED.
SEARCH does not give us any result.
SEARCG_FEDERATED does give us results.
Second problem:
If we open the value lists for for example CAREER_TYPE, we get 2 results to choose from, when there are actually 3
If we go in debug, we can see that the table returns 3 lines, but the first one contains 0 while the 2nd and 3th return 0003 and 0004. First one should be 0002.
We are on TREX 7.1 revision 53 and I have asked BASIS to install revision 58.
Any idea's ?
Kr

FM or BAPI to create 1001 IT for Central Person

Hi Friends
I need FM or BAPI to create 1001 relationship for OTYPE CP ' Central Person ' .
FM HR_CENTRALPERSON_INSERT is there to create IT 1000 for CP i need for 1001 IT
anybody pls guide me.
Regards
Meeta

Hi
Thanks for your response
i have to create CP for B209 relations type ( subtype )
but prog giving me error ( Relationship CP B 209 P cannot be maintained using basic trainsaciton )
CALL FUNCTION 'RH_RELATION_MAINTAIN'
 EXPORTING
 ACT_FCODE = 'INSE'
 ACT_PLVAR = '01'
 ACT_OTYPE = 'CP'
 ACT_OBJID = '01119840'
 ACT_ISTAT = '1'
 ACT_RSIGN = 'B'
 ACT_RELAT = '209'
 ACT_SCLAS = 'P'
 ACT_SOBID = '01119840'
 ACT_BEGDA = SY-DATUM
 ACT_ENDDA = '99991231'
 ACT_PRIOX =
 ACT_PROZT =
 REL_ENDDA =
 EXCEPTIONS
 MAINTAINANCE_FAILED = 1.
 OTHERS = 2
 IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
 WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
 ENDIF.
Regards
Meeta

'No detailed information exists for this person' while adding new reviewer

Hi All,
This is an extremely urgent issue.
We are getting the following message in SRM while adding a new approver to the Shopping cart once the - 'No detailed information exists for this person'
We have implemented the following OSS Notes in the SRM 5.5 system, Release 700 after rasing a call with SAP.
SAP Pilot OSS note - 1002957
Other OSS Notes -
999528 Adding Ad Hoc Approver fails due to comit erro...
722357 Ad hoc: Commit control with ad hoc enhancement...
990467 Commit Problem with AdHoc Agents...
984582 Problems with Posting Container Data (ad Hoc
 agent...
947296 Inserted/changed approver is not transferred...
910925 SRM Workflow: Ad-hoc agent not found...
803628 BADI workflow: You cannot add an approver
Here are the details
 Cannot add additional approver
 We are now on SRM 5.5 and a document attached shows the
 patch levels
 from SPAM.
 In shop transaction, it is possible to change the
 default approvers,
 but not possible to Add.
 When we add, the system shows the list of available
 approvers, allows
 selection, but "transfer" button does not actually
 transfer.
 When the cart is saved, the added approval shows as "no
 approval
 available".
 We are using the standard workflows for 2 step approval.
 A document is attached to show what happens and the
 results of checks
 we have performed.
 BUS2121 also shows as ok when checked.
Any pointers what could be possible reasons.
Points for sure. !!
Regards
- Atul

Hi Atul,
Here is the list.
 |----- 0000702787 EBP 4.0: Message "Enter a country"
 |----- 0000732828 E-mail messages for work items with incorrect line break
 |----- 0000735026 Memory problems at BBP_GETLIST_INDEX_FILL
 |----- 0000804317 SRM40/SUS/PO: PO inbound with error BBP_PD 147
 |----- 0000862851 PO not ordered due to different locations error
 |----- 0000902956 Changing Account assignment category BE Limit service PO
 |----- 0000911446 No reservation is created
 |----- 0000917869 SRM 5.0: PPOMV_BBP - Vendor address tab page
 |----- 0000919553 SRM 5.0: Termination of output preview for invalid partner
 |----- 0000920363 Shopping cart transfer: Sourcing indicator is not set
 |----- 0000924218 SRM 5.0: wrong error message for non existant auth. PurchOrg
 |----- 0000924811 SRM5.0: Javascript error on document screen
 |----- 0000926750 Shopping cart: Unit of measure is not restored
 |----- 0000926878 Link for expanding details in the shopping cart too small
 |----- 0000927142 SRM5.0: Browser hangs up during attachment upload
 |----- 0000938168 SRM50: Message "No default value from vendor master"
 |----- 0000938296 JavaScript runtime error in the bid invitation
 |----- 0000940805 BBPS_SC_APP_SOS cannot be enhanced
 |----- 0000941935 External requirements displayed as a reference
 |----- 0000942742 Update is cancelled if new source of supply is found
 |----- 0000944592 No location when vendor has changed
 |----- 0000944918 ECS: Find back end purchasing group as a responsible group
 |----- 0000945601 Termination when you display purchase order item detail
 |----- 0000948425 Shopping basket changeable although already approved
 |----- 0000953238 Shopping cart history in the sourcing cockpit
 |----- 0000954066 Follow-On Documents Tab does not get Highlighted
 |----- 0000954409 Error message during approval of a confirmation
 |----- 0000955377 Long runtimes for workflows with blocks
 |----- 0000956108 Empty worklist after clicking button 'Find'
 |----- 0000956723 BBPMAININT:Bus. partner display switches to maintenance mode
 |----- 0000956797 RUSRM50: Limit Purchase Order Functional Area Error Message
 |----- 0000957884 Category Management: Data disappears after program SAVE
 |----- 0000958045 BBPSC04: Delete icon not hidden despite screen variant
 |----- 0000958349 Final delivery with quantity 0
 |----- 0000959528 During PO creation wrong error message BBP_PD 428
 |----- 0000960169 Favorites not saved for 'Purchase for'
 |----- 0000961422 BBP_MON_SC: No search help for 'Created By'
 |----- 0000962093 BBP_VENDOR_CREATE: Refresh BP data
 |----- 0000962252 BBP_GETLIST_INDEX_FILL: Incorrect processing statistics
 |----- 0000962474 Error after changing partner data
 |----- 0000964132 Approval Preview for Rejected Items: Wrong User's Inbox
 |----- 0000964361 Cannot find employee of vendor
 |----- 0000964455 Country for the PO box is initial
 |----- 0000964911 Kopieren von Alertkategorien: Containerelemente verschwinden
 |----- 0000966072 Download of material fails - set type COMM_PR_UNIT
 |----- 0000966323 Service Item: Not able to create PO in ERP backend
 |----- 0000967429 Approval buttons not updated after release
 |----- 0000967615 Performance of BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL may be poor
 |----- 0000968110 Transfer canceled, account assignment acc. to value/quantity
 |----- 0000968251 BBPSC02:In source of supply preferred vendor not validated
 |----- 0000969091 SRM does not support passwords longer than 8 characters
 |----- 0000982293 Ext requirements: Purchasing group data not transferred
 |----- 0000982448 Impossibility to delete an item in PO
 |----- 0000982674 Change PO quantity does not update account assign quantity
 |----- 0000983130 Search for back-end purchase orders using the requester name
 |----- 0000984184 BADI BBP_ALERTING active but its implementation isn't called
 |----- 0000985179 Delete button active for backend service entry sheets
 |----- 0000990264 Multiple confirmations cannot be posted for service & limit
 |----- 0000996104 No catalog when confirming back-end blanket purchase orders
 |----- 0001003408 BBPCF: Cannot Add Catalog Item to Confirmation for Limit PO
 0001010791 Flag Confirmation based Invoice Verification set erroneous
Kind regards,
Yann

Grey out an application for a person who already has filled the application

Hi All,
I have made an application which is prompts user to select various check boxes and fill text boxes. At the end of the form there is a submit button, which upon clicking inserts a record in database with that particular persons id.
Now the issue is, how could I grey out the form so that next time the same user cannot fill the form. Right now I am able to display that, that person has already filled the form, but am not able to grey out the form.
Please help me.
Thanks,
Verity.

if there is a value in the row they are retrieving from the database to show they have completed data entry on the data, you can set the items in the region to be read-only.
Each item has a section in the setup labeled Read Only Condition Type. In this you would select the Value of item in Expression 1 Equals expression 2. In Item one you would enter the item that has the value flagging the row as completed, and in item 2, you would be the value that shows the row is completed..
Thank you,
Tony Miller
Webster, TX

Central person for vendors replicated from R/3

Hi All,
I have replicated the vendors from R/3 to EBP system through PPOMV_BBP to Vendor root organisation.Alll the vendors got Business partenr ID only.
If I want to send the bid invitation to the one of the vendor from the vendor root organisation it is asking for central person is not existing for this vendor . How can we get the contact person for the vendors for whose are replicated form R/3.
Thanks in Advance.
Nanaji.v

HI Nanaji,
we r using SRM 5.5 spk 11 & ECS
I replicated vendor from SRM and i,m not able to create the contact person by using tnx BBPMAININT(Employee for Business partner),it is throughing the error as "Invalid Date Format" when i am saving.
please let me know the procedure u followed to create contact person.
I read that contact person is required for a vendor to send the bid invitatation to him,is't correct.
Please let me know in detail about the fields in BBPMAININT(Employee for Business partner) like Userid pwd etc.
Thanks.,
Suma.

Central person ID in HRP1001

Hi Experts,
Please let me know how to find out who deleted/changed the central person id of a pernr.
Can I get this information from table HRP1001. Please let me know from which table I can get this.
Thanks & Regards,
Soumya.

Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
I would like to know how to find out the central person ID of a pernr. For eg: central person ID is maintained for pernr 100. How to find it? Which table gives that information..
The central person ID of pernr 200 is deleted. How can I find out who deleted the central person id of pernr 200 from table HRP1001.
Thanks & Regards,
Soumya.

Maintaining sub element Costs for the Service Activity

Dear Experts & MM Gurus,
Requirement is to maintain the Sub Cost Elements for the activity and to maintain different unit & Rate for the sub cost elements .
Scenario is explained below.
1. while making Purchase Requisition for Services
in Services Tab at item level i maintained Service Activity and for that activity i had maintained sub cost elements (Such as cost estimate for the activity) like labour cost,material & consumables cost,Transportation cost with the help of Pricing MS0000.
2. My Concern is i need to maintain different unit and rate for the sub cost elements ,but system is not allowing to maintain different unit from unit available with activity unit.How can i maintain different unit for the Sub cost (pricing elements like PRSO,PRS1,PRS2) .
EXAMPLE :1. Activity is Laying of Road where unit is AU and price will be combination of all Sub cost elements .
2. Sub Cost Elements like labour cost where unit is man days,system doesnt allow to maintain this unit.
pl comment /suggest on the above scenario.
Thanks in Advance ,
Regds,
Injeti

Hi
For services, U create activity group in AC03.
U can have upto four levels.
And Model service specifications u maintain in ML10.
Then mainatin service conditions in ML33 / ML 39 based on with or with out plant.
Then create the document, the price will pick it from the conditios u maintained.
Please check and revert back
Regards,
Raman

Error while maintaining the Update Rules for the Infostructure

Hi,
I have added 2 new characteristics for the existing infostructure S9xx and executed the same. While maintaining the Update Rules for the same, system is giving the error message 1. "Field 'PARVW' unknown" and 2. Error generating program RMCX0011.
Please guide me in resolving the issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Kumar.

Hi,
This is with reference to my earlier question that an error is occuring while maintaining the update rules for the existing Infostructure.
Solution provider for this will be rewarded with good points.
Regards,
Kumar.

Multiple position for one central person and one user

Dear Guru's,
I have a requirement to create multiple position for a existing User - which already has CP Central Person and S Position.
How to create this new position and assign the same CP to all the new positions ?
Thanks and regards,
Anil Rajpal

Hi
Yes you can definitely do this
Create the new position and assign the CP to this position in transaction PPOME. You may find the position first there in PPOME, and then drag-drop the CP over the position to make the assignment. System will ask the percentage of responsibility.......which you will ve to enter...
Regards
Virender Singh

Person is already being processed by in while updating an infotype through

Hi,
I am trying to update custom infotypes through BDC based on status change of employee in infotype 0000 , while the BDC is executing I am getting an error message 'Person is already being processed by - ' What is this error and how to rectify it ?

Hi!
You can't call a transaction (with BDC) from inside a transaction (in a user-exit).
The call transaction contains a commit work - and this would corrupt the transaction logic of the first transaction. Even if you call something which is not currently locked by the first transaction, you should not do this.
Either make your updates after saving the first transaction or try to change values inside the first transaction in global data (internal tables / structures which will be saved by standard later).
Regards,
Christian

Delete Central Person(CP) for a person(P)

Hi All,
I am facing a a scenario in which i need to get rid of all the multiple CP from SAP. I seen some of the eomployee are attached to multiple Central person ID.
Can anybody tell me how to delete a CP in SAP.
Mani

Hi Mani,
The P-CP relationship is established through A/B 209. Try deleting unwanted relationship records in IT1001. Also check IT0031 for the employees.
Donnie

Transferring standard HR Idoc fields to CRM Central Person via ALE

Hello experts!
Here is a description of a scenario I would like some help with please.
We have a fully functioning standard ALE distribution of HRMD_ABA05
IDoc from an HR Instance to a CRM Instance.
The integration is maintaining Central Person data in CRM and then
it maintains the Employee role Business Partner data from the CP.
However it is a requirement to include the additional communication
types and numbers stored in the HR System's PA0006 InfoType.
Our requirement is to transfer fields PA0006-COM01, PA0006-NUM01... etc
from HR to CRM. I understand that the target Central Person InfoType
of PA0006 in CRM is HRP5583. This does not however contain the COM01,
NUM01 fields.
To this end I have tried in vain to implement the instructions
contained in the cookbook attached to SAP Note 758426.
I understand that in order to map this fields to the CRM Employee BP
they must first exist on the Central Person record.
I believe our scenario to be similar to Scenario 2 as described in the
Cookbook in note 758426 except that the data already exists in the
source IDoc.
I have an implementation of Badi HRALEX_INBOUND but am unable to step
into it from debug despite placing external breakpoints with the
correct user... I'm not sure where or when this Badi should trigger?
I would therefore like to know how to extend HRP5583 to include the
extra standard data from PA0006.
Thanks in advance for any help provided.
Jim

hi
you can use PFAL to transfer HR master data.
the data transfer from r/3 to crm is by means of bdoc and not through idoc.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm20c/helpdata/en/3b/e13b38fedcb72de10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
cheers,
hakim

Transfer from COmpany code to another Central Person..

My client req is to transfer one Employee from company code to another COmpany COde
COmpany COde      Number Range
HIL1           1000 - 50000
HIL2          100000 - 200000
Transfer EMployee 1111 from Company COde HIL1 to HIL2. SInce it is not possible to change his Number from 1111 to 100000 series it is not possible, I suggested to Seprate that employee from HIL1 and rehire in HIL. Now client wants all thta master data to be copied into HIL2 company code. Please adise how to handle this...
Thanks
Ravi.

Hi SAPHCM,
You are seeing some of the problems when you use Personnel Number to indicate something other than a specific individual. You should not separate blocks of PERNRs by Company Code or any other grouping for the reasons you are now seeing - people get tranferred and the PERNR should not change. The Organizational Assignment infotype contains all the fields necessary to separate out employees - PERNR should not be used for this.
If the Company Codes are in different countries, you can use the action "Cross Country Transfer". This will retain all the personal data infotypes for an employee while it terminates him from one country and hires him into the other. A better way to handle cross country transfers is "Global Employment". If you are in 4.7 and above you can activate this and it will allow you to have more than one personnel number for an employee. Here you use CP-Central Person to identify the employee.
Again, remove the separate blocks of numbers from being assigned by Company Code and your situation would be resolved by a simple transfer action.
Paul

Issue with IT0031 and Central Person and Business Partner (HRALX PBPHR)

Hello
the following issue appeared in our system:
I have two employee numbers (P1 und P2) that I need to link via IT0031 to make sure they have the same Central Person ID (CP). P1 already has a BP-relation (BP1) - the other doesn't.
When I am now trying to save IT0031 I get the message that P1 and P2 can not be linked - but what is worse, P2 (the one formerly without a BP-relation) now has a BP2 even though nothing was saved in the infotype.
It seems to have something to do with HRALX PBPHR because if I switch the parameter off in T77S0 I am able to link the two P (and therefore make sure only one CP and one BP relation exist) - but is the parameter activated it will generate a new second BP even though there is no cause to do so.
Does anyone know how to fix this?
Unfortunately, I can't let the parameter HRALX PBPHR switched off, so I need some sort of work-around. Any help is appreciated.

Hello
thanks for your reply...but the problem ist not the Central Person but the fact that while trying to link two P the parameter HRALX PBPHR in T77S0 generates a new BP for the P that hasn't had a BP relation before.
In IT0031 no changes are saved due to an error message that results from finding relations to an object - that has not been there before. So, somehow I think this might be a bug or something because I see no reason why the parameter would react to linking two P via IT0031. Because the whole idea of this infotype is to copy CP and BP relations from one P to the other. And it works just fine when deactivating the parameter.

Maintaining Infotypes in PP01 for Central Person while already maintained n

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for