Maintenance order teco?
hi
when my maintenance order is in status TECO it allows me to do service entry sheet.But according
to my view it should not allow in standard sap.It is because service entry sheet is technical acceptance
by maintenance people.So you complete the service entry sheet and make the order TECO.Please
explain me in detail.
regards
sanjay
You use the technical completion of an order to define the following information for the order:
u2022 The order obtains the status Technically completed. The order is marked as complete for Plant Maintenance.
u2022 Now you can only make the following changes:
o Lock and unlock the order
o Set the deletion flag
o Post goods receipts for the order
u2022 You can still enter confirmations for a technically completed order. In order to prevent this, you must create a user status that does not permit confirmations.
u2022 The storage location and account assignment data entered for the order are fixed and can no longer be changed. However, the order can still receive costs, for example, through incoming invoices for materials delivered and used.
If no settlement rule has yet been maintained for the order, the system creates one automatically. If missing data makes this impossible, the system takes you to the screen for maintaining the settlement rule.
u2022 All the existing purchase requisitions for the order are flagged for deletion.
u2022 All the existing reservations for the order are cleared.
u2022 All outstanding capacities which have been scheduled for the order are cleared.
u2022 All the notifications for the order are also completed, unless prevented for one of the following reasons:
o The Complete notifications indicator was not set in the Complete dialog box.
o One or more tasks have not been completed.
o A user status in the notification prevents it from been completed.
u2022 If the order was created using a maintenance plan, the date of the technical completion will be used for the further Scheduling of the Maintenance Plan.
You can make changes to the maintenance process procedure when completing orders. You can, for example, prevent all users that are allowed to complete orders and notifications from using this data simultaneously to change the scheduling of maintenance plans. For more information, see Separate Completion of Maintenance Call Dates
- Pithan
Similar Messages
-
Maintenance Order TECO date must not be befor the Permit Issue Date
Hi Friends,
I have a genuine requirement like " Maintenance Order TECO date must not be befor the Permit Issue Date ".
The requirement is System shall issue a message if TECO date is before the Permit issue date.
Guys pls help me onthis.
Thanks & Regards,
krishnaKrishna,
What you can do is use a User Exit: IWO10004 Maintenance order: Customer check for order completionand check that the reference date of completion, also you would need the approval date for the assigned permits in Order by using the table "IHSG" or a relevant function module to get the details of the Permit approval date. After you have the permit approval date, you can compare it with the reference date of completion and if mismatched then generate the relevant error message.
regards,
Muhammad Usman Kahoot -
User exit for maintenance order TECO
Hi
1. I want to restrict system not to do TECO of maintenance order until it is CNF
2.During creation of notification user has to enter either functional location or equipment
Can any one pl tell me the name of user exit? also how can I find out the name of relevant user exit in t-code smod or cmod?
thnks in advance
rgds
rajibHi Rajib,
For your 1st question i would suggest you to use user statuses to prevent order TECO unless the order status is CNF. For example you may create as follows:
Status Status Desc lowest highest
no
1 OSOO Outstanding order 1 2 -
Initial Status
2 REL released 2 4
3 PCNF opn partial confirm 2 4
4 CNF opn confirm 2 4
For all Statuses (1 to 3) forbid the business transaction "TECO" and permit it for Status 4.In this way unless the status of order is "CNF" you will not be able to Complete the order.
For the 2nd question you may check user exit IWOC0001/QQMA0014 and consult with an ABAPer to write a code to check your condition.
Regards,
S.Basu -
How to restrict the Order TECO wiht out serviceentry sheet / usage Decision
Dear PM Guru's
i am seeking a good solution for the following issue. suppose one external order created, against to this PO created, but maintenance people TECO the order with out creating the service entry sheet. how i can restrict this functionality? please suggest me good solution which is very simplicity. and some of the orders are TECO with out the usage decsion taken against the Inspection lot, here also how i can restrict the TECO the order is there any function module or enhancement to avoid such a mistakes? please guide me and give an good idea to sort out this issue as soon as possible.
thanks in advance to all the PM guru's.
regards
jaluHi,
By doing the user exit in IW32 we achieved the requirement of restriction of maintenance order TECO functionality if any Service Entry sheet pending with reference of maintneance order.
regards
JKM -
Operations in Preventive maintenance order has to release then only order has to TECO
Hi,Friends
is there any standard in R/3 that as soon as i am not releasing Operations in Preventive maintenance order, order should not be TECO
when ever i have released Operations then only Preventive Maint order has to be TECO
Your response is highly appriciated
Regards,
KumarKumar,
I'm still confused...
When you release the order header (REL), then all operations are also set to released (REL). You cannot individually release operations using the system status.
However, you can set user statuses for each operation which are configured in the IMG.
Please give more details.
PeteA -
System Status TECO should update automatically in Maintenance Order
Hi,
Our Client has a requirement in the Maintenance Order.
Whenever we confirm the Last Open Operation in the Order, the system status should automatically update to TECO.
Any Inputs, please let me know.
Thanks in advance!!Hi again,
Fairly old thread now but... (Wanted to share some info here for anyone interested)
Correct and accurate, using any of these FM:
STATUS_CHANGE_INTERN
STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN
or IBAPI_ALM_ORDER_TECO_SET
This will definitely work as I have used them and this did work then.
What I would do is this:
- Check in chosen User-Exit if all needed prerequisites are meet for the operations first of course
- If this is possible during the saving process then just use say FM STATUS_CHANGE_INTERN for the update. Commit will then not be needed as we are in "IW32"-transaction mode already.
- If the above is not possible then I would create a FM that is called in "in update task" from the very same User-Exit with the Order number as importing parameter. What will happen is that the Order will first be saved and then the FM will be running afterwards.
Process now:
- Call the FM from the User-Exit "in update task" with the Order number as importing parameter
- Wait for Order to be saved (first try to lock, if locked: wait x secs, try to lock again etc, when OK to lock -> unlock again)
- Read sufficient Order data to determine if prerequisites are met
- Use say FM STATUS_CHANGE_INTERN for the update (here OBJNR can be read from table AUFK for the Order number)
- Remember to do a COMMIT"
Done.
BR, Johan -
Automatic Creation of Settlement Rule for Maintenance Order
Hi,
While doing TECO for Maintenance Order, its asking for Settlement Rule. IF I click settlement rule, message is coming as Maintain Settlement Profile with options like With Default, Without Default & Cancel.
I have maintained the Cost center in Equipment Master. Also I maintained Cost Center as Default Settlement receiver.
Also I have gone through setting in Automatic Creation of Settlement Rule under Controlling Category.
But I couldnt understand that. Can you please tell what are the steps to be done?
Regards,
Maheswaran.Hi,
Please check the indicatorsin Actual cost/cost sales and Valid recevivers in settlement profile.
If for cost center : 1 settlement optional is maintained in valid recevivers and also for order
and in actual cost/ cost sales: indicator to be settled in full is selected.
Also check Allocation structure too if you have assigned the valid allocation structure.
**check if you have assigned the valid settlement profile to order types.
*****Most important after doing all these settings you need to create new order. for same order you will not get the automatic settlement rule
Hope this helps.
Regards,
PMAddi -
Block Order TECO on the basis of operation User Status
Hi Experts,
I am trying to restrict the TECO of maintenance order on the basis of order operation status. I have configured the user status profile and assigned it to order operation. This user status profile have two statuses, INCL - Incomplete and another is CMPL - Complete. I have prohibited the TECO for user status INCL. But when I create an order and try to TECO, the system allows me TECO it enenif the operation user status is INCL.
Could you Pl. tell me, have I missed something in configuration?Dattatraya,
Actually you can control TECO by completion confirmation of order operation as PCNF ( partial confirmation) for operation which you have mentioned in Order. So you can set up in configuration like allow TECO only once CNF ( Full confirmation ) for all operations mentioned in Order.
For your mentioned scenario , I dont feel based on user status you can stop the TECO, anyway you can check with other experts as well.
Riyaj -
Maintenance order release cancel
Hi...Experts
Can we cancel or unrelease maintenance order ?
if yes then pls suggest how ?
Regards
LokeshGreetings Lokesh,
The System Status REL is not reversible. Once an Order is released, it becomes possible to book actual cost to that order, make confirmations, goods receipts etc. This Orders should then follow on to the status TECO, and then to CLSD.
A work-around if you wanted to prevent certain actions on a released Order, or to signify that an Order was released, but then pulled back and might not be executed, would be to create a User Status with some business transaction control in OIBS.
Note that as Maria Terence mentions above, locking the Order is also a good work around that prevents posting costs to Order, among other things. -
Mass closure of maintenance order
Hello experts,
I need to do mass closure of all open maintenance orders.
Is there any way to change the USER STATUS to WOCO (Maintenance work completed) & SYSTEM STATUS TECO (Techically Completed)?
Regards
Pradipta Sahoohi
you cannot change the user status with mass processing in STD SAP, you have to write some abap programming for the same
consult with technical team
regards
thyagarajan -
User Exit Maintenance Order Business Completion
Hello Gurus,
User Exit IWO10004 triggers when TECO the Maintenance order.
What is the User Exit which can triggers when Business Completion?
My requirement is I want to restrict the Business Completion only for TECO orders,
Currently I even REL order also can be CLSD by business completion which is bypassing TECO status.
how can I restrict this?
Please advice
Thanks
AshokAshok,
Adding some inputs of Pete, the following code seems to be working fine. This throws this error
in the taskbar, when you Business Complete and try to save a Non-Teco Order.
DATA: V_PHAS TYPE PM_PHASE,
V_STAT TYPE J_STEXT.
SELECT SINGLE IPHAS FROM AFIH INTO V_PHAS
WHERE AUFNR = CAUFVD_IMP-AUFNR.
CALL FUNCTION 'STATUS_TEXT_EDIT'
EXPORTING
FLG_USER_STAT = 'X'
OBJNR = CAUFVD_IMP-OBJNR
ONLY_ACTIVE = 'X'
SPRAS = SY-LANGU
IMPORTING
LINE = V_STAT.
IF V_PHAS <> '3'.
IF V_STAT+0(4) = 'CLSD'.
MESSAGE: 'Status ''TECO'' is essential for Business Completion' TYPE 'E'.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
CLEAR: V_PHAS, V_STAT.
Please test and confirm.
KJogeswaraRao -
Archive PO associated with Maintenance Order
We have maintenance orders back to 2004 that have never been closed or had the delete flag set. We would like to get these cleaned up. Many of them have purchase orders attached to them.
I ran MEMASSPO to set the final invoice indicator on the purchase orders that were hanging out there but when I tried to then close the orders and set the deletion flag I couldn't. I would get an error that the PO still existed. With production orders I would run RM06EV47 to set the delete flag on the PO then I would be able to close the production order. This doesn't seem to be the case with maintenance orders.
When I run RM06EV47 on the purchase orders that are associated with maintenance orders I get the message "Archive Run only flags Production Order POs. See BADI."
I haven't been able to find anything regarding how to set the delete flag on these POs. Can someone tell me what the process is?
Thanks much,
AndreaThere is no relation between archiving PM Order & PO existence.
When you make TECO & Business Completion of those orders, corresponding PR will get deletion flag.
You can run SARA for Purchase Order as well as Maintenance Order archival which will set Deletion flag as well as archive those documents.
Archive Purchase Orders
Archiving Object for PO - MM_EKKO
Archiving Object for Maintenance Order - PM_ORDER -
To Control status of the operations of maintenance orders individually
Hi,
To Control status of the operations of maintenance orders individually
Anyone know how to control individually the operation status of maintenance orders?, see the image below?
Exsample: I need complete (TECO) only the operation 0010
Thanks,
Adilson DelfinoAdilson Delfino
The system-statuses cannot be set manually by the user (like you can with user-statuses).
You need to process a function to make these statuses change, e.g. releasing the order header, TECOing and order or dispatching operations. Alternatively you can develop a solution that may be able to change these statuses (see above post).
I don't think you will be able to set the TECO status on individual operations.
Have you considered user-statuses on the operations?
PeteA -
Transaction for Mass processing of PM(Plant maintenance) orders
Hi all,
Pls let me know if there is any standard tcode for for Mass processing of PM(Plant maintenance) orders
I checked for COHV ,but it's appplicable only for produciton orders it seems
Costing has to be recalculated for all the orders of order type PM02 for financial year 2008-09
Awaiting eagerly for your reply
Thanks,
SVPHello,
Please try using IW38,IW39
execute the screen and then you get the option for releaseing , teco etc
Regards
gajesh -
QA145 information msg to change error msg and will restrict PM order TECO ?
Dear All Guru's
I have made necessary settings in control key PM01 type by selecting the checkbox indicator such as Inspection Characteristics and the same control key is used in Plant Maintenance- Calibration Order.
Before completing UD, there is a possibility of making mistake by completing Order TECO and system is allowing by giving a information message " A usage decision has still to be made and the Message no. is QA145
The Requirement here " Is it possible to make this information message QA145 to an error message as UD not yet done for the inspection lot"
Advance thanks for the comments /suggestions.
Regards,
AjayaHi
Can user exit not used for this perpose
IWO10004 Maintenance order: Customer check for order completion
CONFPM02 |PM/SM order confirmation: Customer specific input checks 1 |
CONFPM04 |PM/SM order conf.: Customer specific input check 2 |
CONFPM05 |PM/SM order conf.: Cust. specific enhancements when saving
Regards
Sujit
Maybe you are looking for
-
Dear Sir We are populateing the Binding object from the backing bean as the following code : public String writeToOutput() { DCIteratorBinding process = getIterator("processIterator"); process.getCurrentRow().setAttribute("SimpleElemet", "Simple Elem
-
Conditional display in a SQL-Report/Report Region
Hi, here I have an example for "Conditional display in a SQL-Report/Report Region". I figured it out in Firefox 3.6.2 using Firebug as development tool on Apex 3.2.1.00.12. First you have to put the following javascript code in the Page HTML-Header:
-
I have a Sonos system with an ipod dock and was experiencing problems when using my ipod. The people at Sonos suggested resetting my ipod, so I did. Now, unfortunatey, my ipod isn't working properly. When I connected it to my itunes it said that it w
-
Hello people, I would rename technical names of infosources, datasources... I see 2 ways : - rename in a table the technical name of this infoobjects - copy the infosource, with template the infosource to change. In the first one, i don't know if thi
-
Missing InDesign plug-ins after installing on new machine running WIN 7
After installing Adobe InDesign CS3 (version 5.0) on a new computer running Windows 7 Professional, InDesign cannot open a file I created 30 days ago on a machine running the same version of InDesign and Windows XP Professional. I repeat, there have