Major color/saturation issues in dvd authoring

hi. we've just finished color correction for our indie film, and looking at the digi-beta master on a pro-ntsc monitor- it looks great. but, the dvd's look terrible. there has been a lot of yellow added to warm up the picture. so on the master, the yellow is subtle and applied to the backgrounds, on the dvd, the yellow is awful and everywhere. for example, on a close up of our lead, his skin is so freakishly yellow he looks like an oompa-loompa- not the look we're going for. here's the other kicker- when played on a computer with an LCD monitor, the dvd's look great- like the master. but i've played the dvd's on 4 different television, with 4 different dvd players, and they all look like crap. does anyone know how to solve this color issue in dvd studio pro? we cut the project in FCP. color was final touch, brought back into FCP. quick time exported from FCP, 10 bit uncompressed, 23.98 non-drop frame. then dvd studio pro used to do the authoring. all dvd studio pro settings are at default. THX!

So you used DVDSP to do the encoding as well as the authoring??
Have you tried taking a short-ish section of the footage and encoding it wiht something a good deal better, such as BitVice, MegaPEX or Canopus Procoder or Cinemacraft? These will give you much, much better quality encodes and you simply author the project with the MPEG file as an asset instead of the uncompressed file. If you use a short section you can get a better estimation of what is happening before you go for the full encode.
I realise these encoders are not free, but if you are serious about what you are doing then you'll need to invest in something that is purpose built for the job! The above range from not very expensive to moderate... and Cinemacraft goes into the high end price bracket depending on the version you opt for.

Similar Messages

  • Re DVD Studio Pro 4:  help with color saturation

    Re DVD Studio Pro 4:  having trouble with the color saturation on the text of menu buttons.  been using the same method for years, checked opacity of colors.  All of a sudden, the text color is splotchy and looks unprofessional. Clients are complaining and I do not blame them.  Any help?

    This issue isn't external drives, it's the mini, and installing the program.
    http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/dvdstudiopro/specs.html
    The specs do not seem to require an internal superdrive.

  • Major Color Issue

    I am having a major color issue in 10.3.9.
    Issue #1:
    Setting Color Labels...
    even though the names of the colors are there, the colors are actually shades of blue and gold.
    Issue #2:
    Mac Icon...
    normally on the dock, it's 2 shades of BLUE.. however on mine, it's 2 shades of GOLD.
    Issue #3:
    Adobe Programs...
    In Photoshop, Illustrator and Acrobat, ALL PHOTOS have this duotone look (blue and black) and the ONLY way to preview a photo in true color, is if I save for web and in that screen, it shows correctly. I'm a graphic designer and it makes it VERY difficult to adjust photos.
    I know its not the photos themselves, because they preview correctly when imported into Quark and also when printed. I have also tried switching monitors, to see if that was the issue and I still have the same problem. I had this problem back in January, when I upgraded to 10.3.9, and my supervisor fixed it through DUMB LUCK! I recently had to re-install everything, including the OS and this problem resurfaced. Now it's almost a year later and we've tried everything we could think of, but no such luck. This is my last hope!
    Does anyone know how to fix this problem, or has anyone ever HAD this problem? Is it just my negative energy that is feeding into it and making it want to lash out at me?!?!

    I am having a very similar issue, and am really pulling my hair out. I have one user that is having this problem - FROM ALL MACHINES! I have deleted ALMOST every preference in ~/Library/Preferences to no joy. Just started yesterday. (I am using network Home Folders - with no other major issues)
    Everything looks like it is in 8 bit color.
    I have done all the standard fixes. It does it no matter which machine this user logs into, so it is not a hardware or /Library/ issue. It definitely is a ~/ issue.
    PB G4 Al (2), MDD G4 Dual (3), AGP, Cube, W3K Server, B&W G3 Server & others (in   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   Server 10.3

  • Major color shifts during softproofing in CS4

    Hi All,
    I'm new here and looking for some help.   I'm running CS4 on MacOS 10.5.8.  I'm not new to color management but am having a problem with a particular output profile that's driving me nuts.
    I usually print at home, and get fantastic results using my home work-flow (and yes, my monitor is calibrated) but recently decided to try my local Costco for printing.
    My working space is adobeRGB--I work on my file, save a copy as a tiff and then softproof using the Nortisu profile provided by Dry Creek photo for my local Costco.  After soft proofing, I flatten, crop, resize and sharpen and then convert to the image to the Costco profile without the embedded colorspace.
    My issue is when I softproof with one image, I get a major color shift--if there's a way to post the file, I'd be happy too.  It turns a lime green frog into a greenish mustard color and I can't recover the color with any amount of adjustment (primarily with selective color channels with hue/saturation and curves layers).  Most of my other photos have very subtle shifts in contrast and brightness, but no major color shifts.
    Any ideas--I know they are using Fuji Crystal Archive paper and an 80,000 dollar Noritsu printer so I wouldn't think I would have huge out of gamut issues, but maybe that's the case?
    Thanks for your help and if there's a way to attach the original file so people can see the softproof themselves, let me know.
    Cheers,
    Gabriel.

    Tai Lao,
    I'm confused--I am embedding the aRGB file into my original file.  Next I am working on a copy of that image which I soft proof with the Costco Noritsu profile.  Only after I have worked on the color shifted image to I convert the profile from aRGB to the Costo profile, so at no point is there no embedded profile in the actual file.  Now, I did do an out of gamut check and lo and behold, the lime green (and that's the best discription of the frog's overall color) was completely out of gamut...what strikes me is that the color shift is so completely extreme!
    Anyway, I'll have to try the color swatch option to choose an in gamut color which I hope closely resembles the color seen in the aRGB image...my question now is how do I view the color swatch!?
    Here's another question--I assumed that sRGB has a narrower gamut than the printers profile, yet when I soft proof the aRGB embedded image using sRGB the color shift is not nearly as extreme.  That's why I feel like something funky is going on using the costco Profile (which is downloaded from Dry Creek to answer someone elses question).  Why would a narrower color space, such as sRGB, retain more of the file's original color than a wider color space, like the Costco Noritsu profile?
    OK...thanks for everyone's help again.
    Gabriel.

  • A different take on the "Save For Web" color shift issue...

    Ok, everyone who has fussed much with photoshop and "Save For Web" knows about the color shift issue. If you want your colors to look right after you "save for web", you have to work in the sRGB colorspace, and have Proof Colors checked (soft proofing on) and the proof color setup set to Monitor RGB, otherwise what you get looks terrible when displayed in a browser.
    But of course if you are editing for print, this is exactly what you DON'T want to do. Well, I work in both. In fact, often the same images, and I want them to appear as close as reasonably possible in both print and web formats, and without a lot of fussing on my part. And I'm pickiest about the print mode, since I have the most control there, so that's the way I want to edit by default.
    Nothing new here.
    Now comes the interesting part (in my mind, anyway). Obviously there is a known remapping -- because PhotoShop DOES it when you select Proof Colors. So the inverse mapping must also be known (with some gamut issues, but I'm not concerned with those, because, after all, I'm VIEWING it on a monitor anyway!). What I want is a plug-in that automatically applies that inverse mapping so that, when I do a Save For Web, I end up with the colors I've been viewing all the time when setting the shot up in print mode. Then, too, I don't have to worry about what mode I'm in when I'm editing -- it just fixes it when doing a save-for-web.
    Again, I want to edit in my normal print mode (typically ProPhoto colorspace, and with soft-proofing off or set to the printer/medium combination I expect to use), then do a single operation (might be a multi-step action) to "screw up" my colors so that when I then do a "Save-For-Web", the resulting image, when viewed on the average color-stupid browser, looks like the image I've been seeing in Photoshop.
    Anyone know of such a beast?   I would gladly pay for a plug-in that really works and fixes the problem.
    And if you have other solutions, I'm interested, but the absolute requirement is that it I do one single edit pass for my colors for both print and web use, and I get what I see on the screen in PS on both the prints and on the web display (i.e., working in sRGB/Monitor RGB mode all the time won't cut it). And PREFERABLY, let me do all my editing work in the ProPhoto (or at least AdobeRGB) colorspace so I have a gamut closer to what the printer can do.
    Anyone got a decent solution for this?

    Sorry, I think I'm being unclear.  This has nothing to do with individual monitor profiles.  In Proof Setup, "Monitor RGB" amounts to turning off ALL color management, and simply letting the monitor do what it will.  It is what the vast majority of web browsers do (even if the operating system provides color management, the browsers don't take advantage of it), so that is what you need to consider for images that will be viewed on a web browser.  If you convert your image to sRGB,  select Monitor RGB in Proof Set up, and turn on Proof Colors, you will see the image as it would appear on a web browser (after you save it as a jpg or use "Save For Web/Devices" to save it as a jpg).   Since almost everyone is running different uncalibrated monitors, there will be lots of variation in how it will look to them, so precise control of the color is unimportant.
    That said, I would expect the color on a calibrated monitor (such as the one I use when editing) to be reasonably close to the colors I am seeing while editing in PS.  To the extent a monitor deviates from "calibrated", those colors will vary, but a good monitor should show good colors.   Unfortunately, this is NOT the case, as my previous post shows.  The colors produced by the steps above are oversaturated and significantly shifted in hue.  There is, to my mind, anyway, no reason for this.  Adobe clearly knows what the mapping is between the colors as it displays them in PS and the un-controlled "Monitor RGB" -- that is, it is the color map they are using during normal editing display.  If they were to reverse-apply that map prior to saving it as a jpg, then the image would appear on a browser on that same (presumably calibrated) monitor very similar to what you set up when editing.  Anyone else viewing the image on a web browser with a calibrated monitor would also see good colors.  To the extent other viewers' monitors are out of calibration, their colors will suck, but there's nothing you can do about that.
    I guess in some sense I AM "asking for a Color-Mamangement-solution for a "non-Color-Management-situation", but specifically I'm asking for PS Color Management to do the best it can for non-Color-Managed situations that we all face every day.
    Does that make more sense?

  • Looking for a better solution to the "Save for web" color shift issue

    Ok, everyone who has fussed much with photoshop and "Save For Web" knows about the color shift issue. If you want your colors to look right after you "save for web", you have to work in the sRGB colorspace, and have Proof Colors checked (soft proofing on) and the proof color setup set to Monitor RGB, otherwise what you get looks terrible when displayed in a browser.
    But of course if you are editing for print, this is exactly what you DON'T want to do. Well, I work in both. In fact, often the same images, and I want them to appear as close as reasonably possible in both print and web formats, and without a lot of fussing on my part. And I'm pickiest about the print mode, since I have the most control there, so that's the way I want to edit by default.
    Nothing new here.
    Now comes the interesting part (in my mind, anyway). Obviously there is a known remapping -- because PhotoShop DOES it when you select Proof Colors. So the inverse mapping must also be known (with some gamut issues, but I'm not concerned with those, because, after all, I'm VIEWING it on a monitor anyway!). What I want is a plug-in that automatically applies that inverse mapping so that, when I do a Save For Web, I end up with the colors I've been viewing all the time when setting the shot up in print mode. Then, too, I don't have to worry about what mode I'm in when I'm editing -- it just fixes it when doing a save-for-web.
    Again, I want to edit in my normal print mode (typically ProPhoto colorspace, and with soft-proofing off or set to the printer/medium combination I expect to use), then do a single operation (might be a multi-step action) to "screw up" my colors so that when I then do a "Save-For-Web", the resulting image, when viewed on the average color-stupid browser, looks like the image I've been seeing in Photoshop.
    Anyone know of such a beast?   I would gladly pay for a plug-in that really works and fixes the problem.
    And if you have other solutions, I'm interested, but the absolute requirement is that it I do one single edit pass for my colors for both print and web use, and I get what I see on the screen in PS on both the prints and on the web display (i.e., working in sRGB/Monitor RGB mode all the time won't cut it). And PREFERABLY, let me do all my editing work in the ProPhoto (or at least AdobeRGB) colorspace so I have a gamut closer to what the printer can do.
    Anyone got a decent solution for this?

    Chris
    I spent all day Googling and doing side by side comparisons of my old and new systems.
    My display is a Dell U2410. It has several presets, including sRGB and Adobe RGB. I've been using sRGB.
    On my OLD system, (Win XP, PsCS2, DwCS4) there seems to be no distinction between color managed and non color managed apps, even on this wide gamut display. I could capture (digital camera) in Adobe RGB, open and edit in PsCS2, save as .psd, convert to CMYK for print, or convert to sRGB for SFW. All images looked identical and they printed and displayed perfectly. I thought this was normal, and seemed logical. This also seems to be the source of my incorrect assumptions. I was trying to get my new machine to behave like my old one.
    So I get this new machine (Windows 7, PsCS5, DwCS5) and now (still in sRGB display mode) all color managed apps appear de-saturated. Non color managed apps are OK. If I switch the display to Adobe RGB, color managed apps are OK, but non color managed apps are way too saturated. From my investigation, I believe this is normal behavior on a wide gamut display. I've tried changing the Control Panel > Display > Screen Resolution > Advanced settings > Color Management options, but to no avail. Either I'm missing something, or Windows 7 is doing color management differently.
    It seems my only option now is to use Adobe RGB display setting for Ps, etc. and switch to sRGB for Dw and non color managed apps. Or, have 2 separate files for print and web. I've Googled 'til my eyes are numb and still not sure I'm getting this. Any enlightenment would be greatly appreciated.
    Finally, I don't see an edit function here, so I can't remove my previous incorrect reply. Moderator, please feel free to do so.
    Thanks

  • Color Management issues with Illustrator

    Can someone help me figure out the color management issues I'm getting when printing on an Epson 3880 from Illustrator?
    The image comes out severely red as evident on the face. I'm not getting the same problem when printing from Photoshop, even though I set same paper profile in printing dialog box.
    I attached two printed picture (one from Photoshop CC, and one from Illustrator CC) that I took with my iphone so that you can see the printed result.  Even when I try to simulate same thing using illustrator soft proofing process, the soft proof does not show me anything close to how it gets printed out. And I tried all device simulations to see if any would match it. Im using  CMYK SWOP v2 for Color space in both programs.

    Dougfly,
    Only an hour wasted? Lucky you. Color is an incredibly complex subject. First, forget matching anything to the small LCD on the back of your camera. That's there as a basic guide and is affected by the internal jpg algorithm of your camera.
    2nd, you're not really takeing a color photo with your digital camera, but three separate B&W images in a mosaic pattern, exposed thru separate red, green and blue filters. Actual color doesn't happen until that matrix is demosaiced in either your raw converter, or the in-camera processor (which relies heavily on camera settings, saturation, contrast, mode, etc.)
    Having said the above, you can still get very good, predictable results in your workflow. I have a few color management articles on my website that you might find very helpful. Check out the Introduction to Color Management and Monitor and Printer Profiling. In my opinion, a monitor calibration device is the minimum entry fee if you want decent color.
    http://www.dinagraphics.com/color_management.php
    Lou

  • There is a major color shift in my artwork image from the photoshop jpeg to dreamweaver - it gets 'g

    There is a major color shift in my artwork image from the photoshop jpeg to dreamweaver - it gets 'grayed out', loses color contrast. I checked in Bridge and the color settings are synchronized. The image in photoshop is just like what i get from my Nikon D90 camera. The  grayed out image has also been noted by two of my professional printer co. which i use but one of my printers - Modern Postcard - the images in photoshop are perfect. I just need to know what causes the color shift and how to control/manage it, thank you, Kathyrn

    I have noted color shifts as well and have come to a few observations.
    When you are making a .JPG file and you are trying to make a color in that file be the same color as your website's background, you're going to get a lot of failures. Photoshop will add color information in an ICC file in the meta information in the file if you like. That tends to produce actual colors, but they do not fit a web gamut.
    The way I generally deal with images that need high quality is that I use the Save for Web and Other Devices exclusively, either ticking on or off the ICC profile for JPEG files and working with what works best. Saving a JPEG with as much information as is possible is usually the best choice but, since JPEG is a "lossy" compression scheme, you are always going to get some issues.
    Additionally, the web browser in question will have control over what is displayed as well.
    So try playing with the ICC profile in Photoshop's Save for Web And Other Devices and see if you can't get things a little more reliable.

  • Color shift (color management) issues in Mavericks

    Noticed color management lacking for Safari and Dock icons just after Maverick update, but was unable to check it with recalibration. Today X-Rite issued an update for i1 Display PRO and i was able to recalibrate my display, but the problem unsurprisingly wasn't in the display profile.
    Bellow are two screenshots of Safari vs. Chrome and FF vs. Chrome respectively.
    Color difference is seen with the naked eye, but gray and blue fields' values are also annotated (Safari is on the left, Chrome is on the right).
    These are FF (on the left) and Chrome (on the right) with no color difference, both browsers are color-managed.

    Issues here too: 2013 Mac Pro, latest Mavericks/browser versions (OS X 10.9.4), and Dell UP2414Q display (known for good color—not to mention the only retina display money can buy).
    Safari seems fine: web sites with no color profiles in the images look very much as I am used to from OS X Lion and Windows on other machines (some variation from screen to screen is just life). CSS colors match image colors when they should.
    Firefox is ultra-saturated: web sites the look fine in Firefox--and identical to Safari--under OS X Lion (on a different Mac/display anyway) but on the new Mavericks system, colors are eye-burningly saturated! That's CSS and images alike (without color profiles). CSS and image colors still match—but both are WAY oversaturated.
    Note: images dragged from Safari and Firefox to my desktop both look fine when opened in Quick Look or Preview. Both (again, images without profiles) look super-saturated like Firefox when opened in Photoshop CC—despite Photoshop having the same settings I'm used to using (color management Off for RGB, working space set to Monitor) on my old Mac with PS CS6 under Lion. Yet the color values in PS CC do register as correct despite looking so bad (same goes when opening my own RGB source PSDs that generated the web sites to begin with).
    Shouldn't Safari and Firefox out of the box look alike, since they do in earlier OS versions? (Even if some workaround is found, "out of the box" a new Mac with default Firefox installation now looks terrible.)
    Separate but complicating issues, in case it helps to diagnose this:
    a) The Dell display's default calibration looks quite good to me; but if I run Apple's visual calibration steps which I would normally do on a new Mac, everything gets very dark. (So I went back to the default calibration, which is supplied by Apple and called "Dell UP2414Q"; Apple clearly supports this display specifically, since I never installed any Dell software.)
    b) When I take an OS X screenshot of Safari, despite it looking "right" everywhere (Preview and Photoshop CC alike), values are way off. (Regardless of whether I strip the color profile or not when importing the screenshot into Photoshop CC.) When I take a screenshot off Firefox, the screenshot looks "right" (no longer oversaturated!) in Preview and Quicklook. When imported into Photoshop CC, Firefox screenshots behave just like drag-saved images from Firefox: they appear super-saturated just like in the browser, BUT the color values at least register correctly.
    c) No setting I can find for Photoshop CC will make exported images look right (and match CSS colors) in ANY browser unless I accept them being super-saturated while I work on them (which of course is untenable). I'll deal with that separately: I've abandoned the new Mac Pro for Photoshop work and gone back to my old Mac (and PS CS6)--but this I assume to be Adobe's fault. I mention it only in case it's some kind of clue.
    For what it's worth, here's my interpretation: Firefox and Photoshop are using the full gamut of the display, while Safari is not—and Safari looks GOOD not using the full gamut. (And at least with this Dell display, it looks "correct" that way.) Pure primary red #FF0000 (images and CSS alike) which appears normal to me in Safari and Preview and Quicklook turns to eye-burning neon red in Firefox and Photoshop (with management Off and working space set to Monitor). It's kind of amazing that the display can show a red even more brilliant than I have ever seen on a computer before, BUT it doesn't help me design web sites for the rest of the world who has a more ordinary gamut.
    Maybe this is just a long-standing Firefox bug, revealed to me now that I have a large-gamut display? (But that wouldn't explain why other people have seen colors MORE saturated in Safari then Firefox.)

  • Adjusting color saturation hp 5520e all-in-one

    Some time ago, I had a HP c4580 photosmart all-in-one printer, which had the option available to adjust color saturation, warmth, brightness, etc.  I later purchased a HP 5520e photosmart all-in-one printer, which doesn't seem to have that option.  Is that option available on that printer, and perhaps I just haven't discovered it?  If not, does HP make a printer that does have that option, or that compares with the old c4580?  The option is seldom needed, but occasionally it is a MUCH needed option.

    Hi @blubrd,
    Welcome to the HP Forums!
    It's possible the Photosmart 5520 may not have the same features that the older software for your Photosmart c4580 did. To check though, you just need to be in the program you want to print from, select File then Print. Then on the print dialogue window you want to click on Preferences (may say Properties) and anything you can change will be on those tabs. You also have the option to click on Advance (or Advanced Options) for a few further things to change.
    If you don't see what you're wanting under those screens, it is most likely not a feature that can be changed on the printer any longer.
    With that being said there may be an HP printer out there with the features you need. To get more advice on what printer will have the features you're wanting you can always contact our Sales team (1-800-473-4732) even just to inquire
    Hope that helps, have a great day!
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post resolved your issue, as it will help others find the solution faster
    Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
    **MissTeriLynn**
    I work on behalf of HP

  • What are Hollywood DVDs authored with?

    I saw another thread asking about DVD games and the complex National Treasure DVD authoring was mentioned. It made me curious - I know there are commercial DVDs that have been authored with DVD Studio Pro, but what are major Hollywood DVDs authored with?

    Many are authored with Sonic's Scenarist, which has a price tag of $25,000 or so.

  • Issues with DVD and with SDL

    Whenever I use SDL under totem, the playing image always remians a fixed size. How do I correct this issue?  If I can't use that, how do I get the option XWindows (X11/Xshm/XV) to work? In either case, will the fonts of subtitles look better? When I ran them under no XV, they had terrible aliasing.
    As for DVD under totem, I've installed gstreamer0.10 -plugins, as well as lidnvav. However, it keeps saying that it "can't determine the type of stream". How do I correct this?

    To answer the last question first; VCD is old and less clear format for today's video.  DVD players can play it but the resolution is poor, kind of like a VHS tape as compared to a DVD.  For something to play in a DVD player, it most likely will require that a DVD authoring software be used.  Windows Movie Maker can do this but it may not like the format of the camcorder you have.  To use something that can handle most any type of video and convert it to a DVD playable in most any DVD player, try DVDFlick.  Free and found here: http://www.dvdflick.net/download.php
    Depending on what part of Nero was used, it too should be able to make a DVD playable in a DVD player.
    {---------- Please click the "Thumbs Up" to say thanks for helping.
    Please click "Accept As Solution" if my help has solved your problem. ----------}
    This is a user supported forum. I am a volunteer and I do not work for HP.

  • Final Cut Pro - does it come with a DVD Authoring Software

    Hey guys!
    I'm just planning to change my Windows to a Mac.
    I was looking around for a DVD Authoring Software and everyone was suggesting DVD Studio Pro. So I looked it up to get it's price but I couldn't find it at all. I would really appreciate it if someone could tell me where DVD Studio Pro is available. It would also be great if you could suggest any other DVD Authoring Software compatible with Mac OS.
    Thanks very much!

    You either have not drunk the kool aid or did not get Apple's version of the future memo.
    The DVD is dead according to Apple corp. And, they are doing everything possible to sweep it away. DVDSP has been discontinued.
    If you want to stay with Apple apps, your options are iDVD or  Compressor 4 ( limited menus). Otherwise, start looking at the Adobe CS suite (particularly Encore).
    Welcome to the brave new world.
    x

  • TMG - 0x80090325 -Certificate Chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted

    Hello,
    I am having some problems with testing a OWA (SSL) rule. I get that message.
    The TMG belongs to the domain and therefore as far as I know it gets the root certificate of my CA (I have deployed a Enterprise CA for my domain).
    That is why I don't understand the message: "...that is not trusted."
    The exact message:
    Testing https://mail.mydomain.eu/owa
    Category: Destination server certificate error
    Error details: 0x80090325 - The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted
    Thanks in advance!
    Luis Olías Técnico/Admon Sistemas . Sevilla (España - Spain)

    Thanks Keith for your reply and apologies for the delay in my answer.
    I coud not wait and I reinstalled the whole machine (W28k R2 + TMG 2010) . I suppose I am still a bad troubleshooter, I have experience setting up ISA, TMG, PKI, Active directory but to a certain extent.
    1. Yes, I saw it when hitting the button "Test Rule" in the Publising rule in the TMG machine.
    2. No, it did not work in this implementation but it has worked in others, this is not difficult to set up, until now, hehe.
    3. You said: "...If you are seeing it when running "Test Rule" then it simply means that TMG does not trust something about the certificate that is on your Exchange Server...."
    But the certificates are auto-enrolled, and when I saw the details of the certificates they all are "valid" , there is a "valid" message.
    4. You wrote: "...Easiest way see everything is create an access rule that allows traffic from the LocalHost of TMG to the CAS and open up a web browser. Does the web browser complain?..."
    But as I said, I re-installed the whole thing because nobody jumped in here , and I needed to move forward, I hope you understand.
    5. S Guna kindly proposed this:
    If you are using internal CA,
    You need to import the Root CA certificate to TMG servers.
    Import Private Key of the certificate to Server personal
    Create a Exchange publishing Rule and Point the lisitner to the Correct certificate.
    Since you are using internal CA, You need to import the Root CA certificate to all the client browers from where you are accessing OWA
    But I think I do not have to perform any of those tasks, although I am not an expert but have worked with Certificate for one year or so.
    Luis Olías Técnico/Admon Sistemas . Sevilla (España - Spain)

  • "The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted" when migrating to SQL 2012

    Environment:
    1 Primary Site (USSCCM-Site.domain.com)
    1 CAS (USSCCM-CAS.domain.com)
    SQL 2008 R2 (USSCCM-CAS.domain.com)
    SQL 2012 SP1 CU6 (USSQL12.domain.com)
    Issue:
    We were successfully able to migrate the CAS to the new SQL 2012 server, almost without incident. When attempting to migrate the Site instance however, we are getting errors. Screenshot below.
    Attached is a copy of the log. But below is a highlight of what I think are the errors… It appears that either SQL or SCCM doesn’t like a certificate somewhere, but it is contradicting because the logs say that it has successfully tested connection to SQL.
    I am lost.
    Logs stating it can connect successfully to SQL
    Machine certificate has been created successfully on server USSQL12.domain.com.        Configuration Manager Setup                10/21/2013 10:20:10
    AM               2100 (0x0834)
    Deinstalled service SMS_SERVER_BOOTSTRAP_USSCCM-Site.domain.com_SMS_SQL_SERVER on USSQL12.domain.com.  Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:10 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    SQL Server instance [sccmsite] is already running under the certificate with thumbprint[f671be844bf39dec7e7fdd725dc30e225991f28a].       Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:10 AM        
    2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: Testing SQL Server [USSQL12.domain.com] connection ...                Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:10 AM      
    2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: SQL Connection succeeded. Connection: USSQL12.domain.com SCCMSITE\MASTER, Type: Unsecure                Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:10 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: Tested SQL Server [USSQL12.domain.com] connection successfully.  Any preceding SQL connection errors may be safely ignored.            Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013
    10:20:10 AM               2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: Certificate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               
    Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:10 AM               2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: Created SQL Server machine certificate for Server [USSQL12.domain.com] successfully.    Configuration Manager Setup 10/21/2013 10:20:10 AM               2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: Configuration Manager Setup - Application Shutdown       Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:10 AM         2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: Running SQL Server test query.    Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:10 AM               2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: SQL Connection succeeded. Connection: USSQL12.domain.com SCCMSITE\MASTER, Type: Secure                Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:10 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: SQL Server Test query succeeded.              Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:10 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: SQLInstance Name: sccmsite         Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:10 AM               2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: SQL Server version detected is 11.0, 11.0.3381.0 (SP1).      Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:10 AM         2100 (0x0834)
    Logs saying certificate is not trusted
    ERROR: SQL Server error: [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]SSL Provider: The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted.        Configuration Manager Setup   
    10/21/2013 10:20:49 AM                2100 (0x0834)
    *** [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Client unable to establish connection                Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:49
    AM               2100 (0x0834)
    ERROR: SQL Server error: [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Client unable to establish connection         Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:49 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    *** Failed to connect to the SQL Server, connection type: CCAR_DB_ACCESS.    Configuration Manager Setup                10/21/2013 10:20:49 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: SQL Connection failed. Connection: CCAR_DB_ACCESS, Type: Secure         Configuration Manager Setup                10/21/2013 10:20:49
    AM               2100 (0x0834)
    *** [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]SSL Provider: The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted. Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:52 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    ERROR: SQL Server error: [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]SSL Provider: The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted.        Configuration Manager Setup   
    10/21/2013 10:20:52 AM                2100 (0x0834)
    *** [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Client unable to establish connection                Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:52
    AM               2100 (0x0834)
    ERROR: SQL Server error: [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Client unable to establish connection         Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:52 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    *** Failed to connect to the SQL Server, connection type: CCAR_DB_ACCESS.    Configuration Manager Setup                10/21/2013 10:20:52 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: SQL Connection failed. Connection: CCAR_DB_ACCESS, Type: Secure         Configuration Manager Setup                10/21/2013 10:20:52
    AM               2100 (0x0834)
    *** [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]SSL Provider: The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted. Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:55 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    ERROR: SQL Server error: [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]SSL Provider: The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted.        Configuration Manager Setup   
    10/21/2013 10:20:55 AM                2100 (0x0834)
    *** [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Client unable to establish connection                Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:55
    AM               2100 (0x0834)
    ERROR: SQL Server error: [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Client unable to establish connection         Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:55 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    *** Failed to connect to the SQL Server, connection type: CCAR_DB_ACCESS.    Configuration Manager Setup                10/21/2013 10:20:55 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: SQL Connection failed. Connection: CCAR_DB_ACCESS, Type: Secure         Configuration Manager Setup                10/21/2013 10:20:55
    AM               2100 (0x0834)
    *** [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]SSL Provider: The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted. Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:58 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    ERROR: SQL Server error: [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]SSL Provider: The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted.        Configuration Manager Setup   
    10/21/2013 10:20:58 AM                2100 (0x0834)
    *** [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Client unable to establish connection                Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:58
    AM               2100 (0x0834)
    ERROR: SQL Server error: [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Client unable to establish connection         Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:20:58 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    *** Failed to connect to the SQL Server, connection type: CCAR_DB_ACCESS.    Configuration Manager Setup                10/21/2013 10:20:58 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: SQL Connection failed. Connection: CCAR_DB_ACCESS, Type: Secure         Configuration Manager Setup                10/21/2013 10:20:58
    AM               2100 (0x0834)
    *** [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]SSL Provider: The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted. Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:21:01 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    More logs saying cert is not trusted
    *** [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]SSL Provider: The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted. Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:21:20 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    ERROR: SQL Server error: [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]SSL Provider: The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted.        Configuration Manager Setup   
    10/21/2013 10:21:20 AM                2100 (0x0834)
    *** [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Client unable to establish connection                Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:21:20
    AM               2100 (0x0834)
    ERROR: SQL Server error: [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Client unable to establish connection         Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:21:20 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    *** Failed to connect to the SQL Server, connection type: CCAR_DB_ACCESS.    Configuration Manager Setup                10/21/2013 10:21:20 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    INFO: Updated the site control information on the SQL Server USSQL12.domain.com.    Configuration Manager Setup                10/21/2013 10:21:39 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    *** [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]SSL Provider: The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted. Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:21:39 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    ERROR: SQL Server error: [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]SSL Provider: The certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted.        Configuration Manager Setup   
    10/21/2013 10:21:39 AM                2100 (0x0834)
    *** [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Client unable to establish connection                Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:21:39
    AM               2100 (0x0834)
    ERROR: SQL Server error: [08001][-2146893019][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Client unable to establish connection         Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:21:39 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    *** Failed to connect to the SQL Server, connection type: CCAR_DB_ACCESS.    Configuration Manager Setup                10/21/2013 10:21:39 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    CSiteSettings::WriteActualSCFToDatabase: Failed to get SQL connection                Configuration Manager Setup               
    10/21/2013 10:21:39 AM               2100 (0x0834)
    CSiteSettings::WriteActualSCFToDatabaseForNewSite: WriteActualSCFToDatabase(USA) returns 0x87D20002                Configuration Manager Setup    10/21/2013 10:21:39
    AM               2100 (0x0834)
    ERROR: Failed to insert the recovery site control image to the parent database. Configuration Manager Setup                10/21/2013 10:21:39 AM              
    2100 (0x0834)
    Troubleshooting:
    I have read on a few articles of other people having this issue that states to find the certificate on SQL 2012 that’s being used and export it to the SCCM server – which I’ve done.
    http://damianflynn.com/2012/08/22/sccm-2012-and-sql-certificates/
    http://trevorsullivan.net/2013/05/16/configmgr-2012-sp1-remote-sql-connectivity-problem/
    http://scug.be/sccm/2012/09/19/configmgr-2012-rtm-sp1-and-remote-management-points-not-healthy-when-running-configmgr-db-on-a-sql-cluster/
    -Brad

    Hi,
    How about importing certificate in the personal folder under SQL server computer account into SCCM server computer account or SCCM server service account? That certificate is for SQL Server Identification. And you could
    set the value of the ForceEncryption option to NO. (SQL Server Configuration Manager->SQL Server Network Configuration->
    Protocols for <server instance>->Properties)
    Best Regards,
    Joyce Li
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Maybe you are looking for