Major diff. b/w CUCM v7,v8 and v9

Hi All,What are the major differences between CUCM v7, v8 and v9 ?
Thanks

Hi,
you can also visit the link and refer word DOC by Rob.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11073566/differences-between-versions-cisco-call-manager
CUCM 8 supports virtualization  and version 9 supports centralised ELM along with virtualisation while call manager 7 does not support both.
regds,
aman

Similar Messages

  • Major difference between JRE 1.4.2_13 and JRE 1.4.2_17

    Can anyone pls tell me the major diff betwenn two JRE versions.
    1) JRE 1.4.2_13
    2) JRE 1.4.2_17
    Currenly my application is using 1.4.2_13 and now we have to use 1.4.2_17.

    Those are update releases. Check the release notes. See also
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/ReleaseNotes.html#142_17
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/ReleaseNotes.html#142_16
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/ReleaseNotes.html#142_15
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/ReleaseNotes.html#142_14

  • What is diff b/w contract with doc and w/o document?

    hi
       what is diff b/w contract with doc and w/o document?
    regards
    Ram]
    Edited by: Ian Wong on Aug 13, 2008 7:01 PM

    Hi,
    Are you taking about Distributed contracts..if not then pls elaborate your question..explain properly, its use, where is req. etc..
    Regards
    Priyanka.P
    Edited by: Ian Wong on Aug 13, 2008 7:02 PM

  • What are the major differences b/w live copy blueprint and Language copy of CQ ?

    We are in process of creating a different Language Versions of a Website and trying to figure out the best/recommended approach.
    what are the major differences b/w live copy blueprint and Language copy of CQ ? which one is recommended in which ? any pointers on this would be appreciated.

    The language copy tool is a one-shot tool to create pages under a certain structure. It has a nice UI for it. But that's it.
    The MSM blueprint/livecopy concept is much more powerfull, because it has live connections between the blueprint and the livecopy. It does not only allow you to easily create livecopies, but supports you also in maintaining the relationshop between these. So you can easily detect, that the blueprint page has been updated and needs to be rolled out again. Or that there are conflicts, because both blueprint and livecopy have been updated independently. And so on.
    From my perspective the language copy tool should not be used, because with creation of language pages the "fun" has just started and the real work is just ahead.
    Jörg

  • CUCM, VCS-Core and Edge, B2B Calling

    I have CUCM ver 9.1(2) and VCS 8.1.1 in my environment, the VCS-C and VCS-E are currently setup to do MRA which is working fine for the vpn-less Jabber.
    We also have a number of SX series Telepresence codecs dotted about which are registered to the CUCM and used for internal video conferencing, now the company is wanting the ability for outside video conferencing so need to setup the B2B capability (licencing has been sorted out already for Rich Media Sessions)
    I've been ploughing through a number of docs on this, I have not found one yet specifically for CUCM registered devices and VCS doing nothing but firewall traversal, so the guides I've been working from are for enabling CUCM registered devices to talk to VCS registered devices and just taking relevant bits such as Neighbour zones and SIP trunks from it.
    Does anyone know of a guide specifically for the direction Cisco appear to want us to go, which is Telepresence devices registered to CUCM and the VCS just doing firewall traversal.
    Or a guide on the firewall traversal part only and I can tack it on to my notes from the other adapted guides.
    My current notes have the following tasks I think I need to do to get this working
    - setup partition and CSS on the CUCM for Telepresence calls
    - setup SIP trunk on CUCM pointing to Expressway-C (have subnotes on requirments for SIP Trunk Security profile and the SIP Profile)
    - SIP route pattern(s) on the CUCM pointing to the SIP trunk
    - Enterprise parameters on the CUCM such as Cluster FQDN, Organization Top Level Domain and URI Lookup Policy
    - On the VCS-C a neighbour zone pointing to the CUCM
    - Search rule to route inbound calls to CUCM neighbour zone
    Is this looking correct so far?  If so then what else will I need to in relation to traversal zones and VCS-E call routing to get calls in and out the business?
    thanks in advance
    Tigre

    Was checking the logs on the SX10 itself, appears to be reporting the same thing about 503 Service Unavailable, I had the logging on it set to "Extended Logging"
    (NB - the address 10.1.99.198 in this case is not the SX10, it is my laptop as I was using the SX10's webgui to remotely control the device and make the call)
    Currently discussing this issue with Cisco TAC, will update as and when more info comes
    Line 1113: Sep 10 15:24:56.367 a9 appl[1529]: 6097.58 CuilApp   User admin(1001) about to execute command '/Phonebook/Search ContactType: any Limit: 100 Offset: 0 PhonebookType: local SearchString: [email protected]' from 10.1.99.198.
    Line 1114: Sep 10 15:24:56.375 a9 appl[1529]: 6097.58 CuilApp   User admin(1001) about to execute command '/CallHistory/Recents DetailLevel: Full Limit: 100 Offset: 0 SearchString: [email protected]' from 10.1.99.198.
    Line 1115: Sep 10 15:24:56.384 a9 appl[1529]: 6097.59 CuilApp   User admin(1001) about to execute command '/Phonebook/Search ContactType: any Limit: 100 Offset: 0 PhonebookType: corporate SearchString: [email protected]' from 10.1.99.198.
    Line 1117: Sep 10 15:24:58.634 a9 appl[1529]: 6099.84 CuilApp   User admin(1001) about to execute command '/Dial callType: Video number: [email protected]' from 10.1.99.198.
    Line 1125: Sep 10 15:24:59.154 a9 appl[1529]: 6100.36 MainEvents I: OutgoingCallInvoked(p=3) remoteURI='sip:[email protected]' localURI='sip:[email protected]' bookingID=''
    Line 1164: Sep 10 15:24:59.859 a9 appl[1529]: 6101.07 MC I: CallParticipant: calledUri: sip:[email protected]
    Line 1190: Sep 10 15:24:59.890 a9 appl[1529]: 6101.10 SipPacket   INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0
    Line 1196: Sep 10 15:24:59.892 a9 appl[1529]: 6101.10 SipPacket   To: <sip:[email protected]>
    Line 1295: Sep 10 15:24:59.960 a9 appl[1529]: 6101.17 SipPacket   To: <sip:[email protected]>
    Line 1306: Sep 10 15:24:59.967 a9 appl[1529]: 6101.18 SipPacket   To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=1393374~8642d04e-70cd-49a5-b73c-5ca5fe21b218-48171693
    Line 1313: Sep 10 15:24:59.970 a9 appl[1529]: 6101.18 SipPacket   ACK sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0
    Line 1318: Sep 10 15:24:59.972 a9 appl[1529]: 6101.18 SipPacket   To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=1393374~8642d04e-70cd-49a5-b73c-5ca5fe21b218-48171693
    Line 1328: Sep 10 15:24:59.979 a9 appl[1529]: 6101.19 MainEvents I: CallDisconnectRequested(p=3) remoteURI='sip:[email protected]' cause=[normal('') 'LocalDisconnect']
    Line 1333: Sep 10 15:24:59.986 a9 appl[1529]: 6101.19 MainEvents I: CallDisconnected(p=3) remoteURI='sip:[email protected]' causeToLocal=[disconnected('Service Unavailable') 'RemoteDisconnect'] causeToRemote=[normal('') 'LocalDisconnect']

  • Differences between CUCM 7.x and 8.x.

    Can someone explain the differences between 7.x and 8.x ?

    Hi Jyoti,
    You will find numerous posts with this information on the support community
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11495631/comparison-table-between-cucm-8x-and-7x
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11005596/compare-cucm-6x-7x-8x
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/10993461/comparison-between-cucm-ver-7-and-8
    HTH
    Manish

  • Need Urgent Help on Meeting Place Integration with CUCM 7.1 and AS5400 PSTN Gateway

    Hi,
    This is first time I am on this forum.
    I have already tried going through a lot of docs on docwiki.cisco.com but couldn't find complete configuration help.
    I have to integrate Meeting Place 8.X with an existing CUCM and an E1 gateway (PSTN Gateway) AS5400.
    The CUCM is already part of a Telepresence Environment. I need to create a SIP trunk between AS5400 and CUCM 7.1 and then create a Trunk between AS5400 and Cisco Unified MP 8.X and then between CUMP and CUCM.
    I need help on AS5400 SIP Configs as well as parameters I need to cover on CUCM (Though I have done some basic dial-peer configs but they haven't been of much help).
    Then I also need help on AS5400 SIP configs with CUMP 8.0
    Any docs on Integration between CUMP and TP3000 will be of great help too.
    Rgds,
    Asim

    I can get the Ricoh to register as sip endpoint, it answeres then imediatly disconnects. Doing a monitor with Wireshark looks like it attempts to negotiate t38 but fails. Any idea why this fails?
    |160.260684000|         INVITE SDP (g711U)            |                   |SIP From:
    |         |(5060)   ------------------>  (5060)   |                   |
    |160.338806000|         INVITE SDP (t38)              |                   |SIP Request
    |         |(5060)   <------------------  (63435)  |                   |
    |160.339545000|         491 Request Pending           |                   |SIP Status
    |         |(5060)   ------------------>  (5060)   |                   |
    |160.547894000|         406 Not Acceptable            |                   |SIP Status
    |         |(5060)   <------------------  (63435)  |                   |

  • MTO(Diff between complex make to order and sales order based mass prod)

    Hi
    We are using MTO...Can anyone tell me what is the Diff between complex make to order and sales order based mass prod in finance perspective?

    Hi,
    In the case of complex make to order scenario, through MRP, the Project shall be assigned to the sales order. Then there will be milestone billling and all. In the case of mass production MTO, it is only creation of production order for each sales order item and each sales order item shall have sales order cost estimate.
    Trust this helps much and do encourage our efforts!
    Cheers!
    Edited by: Ashok Singh on Oct 28, 2008 6:53 PM

  • What is the Diff Between tcodes WE19 in XI and WE19 in r/3 sys

    Hi all,
    Can anyone tell me
    What is the Diff Between tcodes WE19 in XI and WE19 in r/3 sys?
    one more question I have a File>XI->IDOC scenario
    the file is picked up from the sender sys
    but not posted the IDOC to the receiver sys
    I need to post that particular record to r/3 sys can any tell me how to post the record.
    Thanks
    Sai.

    SAP PI  alo have ABAP stack part of PI server, so we will have all trasaction codes in PI too(ECC trasaction codes),the use of WE 19 in ECC to reprocess IDoc to external partner system.
    WE 19 tx in PI also same purpose if you are using PI ABAP stack for creating and processing IDoc's,but we never use it.
    You hav to build mapping logic to suppress unwated data and create IDoc in ECC.
    Regards,
    Raj

  • Diff between R/3 Internet sales and CRM  Internet sales

    Hi every body!
    Could any body tell the basic Diff between R/3 Internet sales and CRM  Internet sales.
    Thank you,
    mark..

    Hi Markiv
    Just to round that off, the ERP version lacks:
    - Rule based ATP (with APO)
    - Customer specific product numbers
    - Web based catalog management
    - Support for further e-Service processes
    Cheers
    Dom

  • Diff, bet general SD pricing procedures and Internet Pricing procedure

    Hi,
      Will any one give clear picture about the diff, between SAP SD pricing procedure and Internet Pricing Procedure? and what are the areas it differs?. If you mail me any URL / Doc regarding Internet Pricing Procedure  Configuration that will be of great help.
       [email protected]

    I hope by internet pricing procedure you mean pricing procedure used in Internet Sales / CRM Online.
    Basically, there are no differences. Structure is same. The way pricing procedure is defined & used is same. The only different I would say is, the way you write code for formula & requirements. Usability-wise, they both are same.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Kaushal

  • Diff betw FA Mass addition interaface and FA_ADDITION_PUB.DO_ADDITION API

    Hi
    Can anyone tell me the major difference between FA MASS ADDITION INTERFCAE and FA_ADDITION_PUB.DO_ADDITION API and which one would you recomend to uses for loading assets from legacy system and why?

    Hi
    Can anyone tell me the major difference between FA MASS ADDITION INTERFCAE and FA_ADDITION_PUB.DO_ADDITION API and which one would you recomend to uses for loading assets from legacy system and why?

  • Silent monitoring calls with CUCM 6.0 and UCCX 5.0

    Dear all,
    We have just integrated a 3rd party recording solution in our VoIP system, which consists of CUCM 6.0 and UCCX 5.0.
    Until now we used the recording and monitoring solution of the UCCX for the agents. This worked ok.
    But, as we wanted to record other people's calls and also the outgoing calls of the agents, we have created for them a Recording profile in the CCM and assign it to the agents phone.
    We have also mantained the recording and monitoring active for them in the UCCX.
    What is happenning now is the following:
    - The 3rd party recordings works perfectly.
    - The recording in the UCCX gets only one way audio.
    - The silent monitoring gets only one way audio.
    - If the 3rd party recording server is stopped, but the recording profile is stil active in the phones, the silent monitoring in the UCCX works.
    Could any of you confirm if using a 3rd party recording solution the monitoring still works?
    Is there any 3rd party silent monitoring software?
    Thanks in advcance.
    Best regards,
    Amaia

    We've got to delimit the problem.
    When we use 3rd party recording solution there are 4 RTP flows: 1 incoming to monitored/recorded phone and 3 flows outgoing.
    1 incoming RTP flows
    - voice of remote phone
    3 outgoing RTP flows
    - voice of monitored/recorded phone
    - voice of monitored/recorded phone sent to 3d party recording server
    - voice of remote phone sent to 3rd party recording server
    When we use a network analyzer we see that the agent running in the PC (UCCX 5.0) establishes two RTP flows for the monitoring session. But we can see that one of these flows sends 3 packet RTP per 1 packet RTP sent in the other RTP flow (in the same time).
    We think agent sends to monitoring device all the outoing RTP packets of the phone (that belong to three different RTP flows), instead of sending only the RTP packets belonging to voice of monitored/recorded phone.
    The other flow, voice of remote phone, sounds fine.
    Is there a solution to avoid this problem when we monitor with UCCX 5.0 and record with a 3rd party software at the same time?
    Thanks,
    Christian

  • I recently changed from a pc to a mac book. The major issue I am having right now is getting yahoo to work properly. The major thing is autocomplete does not work and I do not know how to load my contacts to "mail".

    I recently changed from a pc to a mac book. The major issue I am having right now is getting yahoo to work properly. The major thing is autocomplete does not work and I do not know how to load my contacts to "mail". Furthermore, I cannot attach any type of documents to my emails (Yahoo says there is a problem). I suspect there is a setting somewhere, but I don't know where. Javascript is enabled, so I am out of options

    Which os are you using?
    Yahoo issues should be posted in their forums or contact Yahoo tech support.

  • Generic PG with CUCM, IP IVR and CVP

    Hello
    Does any one know if it is possible to have a Generic PG with pims for CUCM, IP IVR and CVP?
    Thanks in advance
    Victor

    Hi
    Be aware there are a few different versions of UCCX - the prices vary quite a lot based on the standard/enhanced/premium version you go for.
    Premium adds some of the things you said you aren't interested in (outbound, agent email etc), so you can probably get away with Enhanced - but really check the requirements carefully. You lose a good number of advanced features such as db integration and so on.
    If you drop another level to Standard, you lose even more - including loss of Agent Desktop in favour of IPPA. Tricky to recommend that in most cases...
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/custcosw/ps5693/ps1846/data_sheet_c78-483369.html
    Regards
    Aaron

Maybe you are looking for