Making Enharmonic changes to a score?

Is there a 'smart' way to make enharmonic changes in a score? Sometimes Logic will 'spell' notes incorrectly, e.g. it will display E flat where D sharp is musically grammatically correct. Obviously, I can delete the 'error(s)' & insert the correct notation, but this can involve several clicks & click&drag to produce an accurate result. Any suggestions?

What about chords with root bass like: B7/Eb. Tonality is B but Logic puts Eb and D sharp is the correct. Trying to change it, Logic put it back to Db

Similar Messages

Getting Error while saving a transaction without making any changes to it.

Hi All,
I have a page where in the advance table I add few rows and save the transaction. First time when I save it everything works fine, but when I save it again without making any changes to the fields I get following error:
"Unable to perform transaction on the record. \nCause: The record has been deleted by another user. \nAction: Cancel the transaction and re-query the records to get the new data."
In the same page if I make any changes again it allows me to save the transaction.
Please guide how we can avoid it..
I have already checked many threads related to the issue but nothing has worked. Please help!!
Any help would be highly appreciated..
Regards,
Nisheeth

Hi All,
please help!!

The action could not be completed because of a conflict with the original item. The conflict may have occurred when an existing item was updated on another computer or device. Open the item again and try making your changes. If the problem continues, cont

I have a user on an iMac 10.6 connected to our domain. She uses Outlook web access for email on our exchange server. Last week she received the following message which is randomly preventing her from sending emails. She claims no attachment was involved in the original email when this all started. I have not been able to look at her account as she is out of the office but maybe someone else dealt with this issue. I realize this may not be Mac related but thought I'd give it a try. She did say it occurred once over two days while working on a PC but it continued over the past weekend.
If an internal user tries to send a message with infected attachment using Outlook Web Access, it may report the following error message: The action could not be completed because of a conflict with the original item. The conflict may have occurred when an existing item was updated on another computer or device. Open the item again and try making your changes. If the problem continues, contact technical support for your organization.
This is because F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange has detected a virus in the attachment. If the user tries to send the message again, the message will be sent but without the attachment. At the same time a blank message with an attachment named "Attachment_information.txt" will remain in the user's Drafts folder. The "Attachment_information.txt" will contain information about the virus detected in the message.

PS - have found other posts indicating that clips smaller than 2s or sometimes 5s, or "short files" can cause this. Modern style editing often uses short takes ! Good grief I cannot believe Apple. Well I deleted a half a dozen short sections and can export, but now of course the video is a ruined piiece of junk and I need to re-do the whole thing, the sound etc. which is basically taking as much time as the original. And each time I re-do it I risk again this lovely error -50 and again trying to figure out what thing bugs it via trial and error instead of a REASONABLE ERROR MESSAGE POINTING TO THE CLIP IT CAN'T PROCESS. What a mess. I HATE this iMovie application - full of BUGS BUGS BUGS which Apple will not fix obviously, since I had this product for a few years and see just hundreds of hits on Google about this error with disappointed users. Such junk I cannot believe I paid money for it and Apple does not support it with fixes !!!
If anyone knows of a GOOD reasonably priced video editing program NOT from APPLE I am still looking for suggestions. I want to do more video in future, but obviously NOT with iMovie !!!

Problems with overage charges and making account changes on line

I have quite a bit of history involving my attempts to resolve the problem of catching my account before it goes over the minutes allowed and making the changes on line (to cut down on call volume) to change my account to raise the minutes allowed for that billing cycle. I was given one reason why it didn't work the first time (I didn't print out my confimation proving I made the changes - bit the bullet and paid those charges) and so the second time wanting to avoid the problem from the first time I made sure I printed out my confirmation. The confirmation had an effective date of change of 07/19/2012 the day I was informed I was nearing my allowed minutes. There were only 4 or 5 maximum days left in that billing cycle so I wanted to nip the problem in the bud and make the changes to my account to be made "that" day. My confirmation said the changes were effective 07/19/2012. In plently of time before that billing cycle ended. Again I was told I did something wrong. This time I'm holding my confirmation in my hand even as the person is telling me again I did it wrong. The purpose Verizon wants it's customers to use the available on-line option is to cut down on their call volume. I didn't go to school to get the knowledge apparantly needed to perform these particular tasks in a manner that is acceptable to Verizon. Has anyone else had problems with trying to fix their problems themselves using Verizons "helpfull" on-line choice?

I have an explanation for you by what was meant by "you did it wrong."
When you make a change effective the date you are requesting it and not at the start or end of your billing cycle, your minute usage for that month is pro-rated.
For example, you say you made a change, because you were nearing your allowance limit, on 7/19/2012 and wanted it effective that day with 5 days left in the billing cycle. Lets assume that your allowance is 700 minutes/month and you were at 675 minutes for that month(still under your monthly allowance). If you make a change effective with 5 days left in your billing cycle to the 1400 minute/month allowance, your allowance for the 1st 25 days of your cycle will have been pro-rated to (25/30) * 700 = 583 minutes. This would mean you would have already had an overage of 92 minutes for the 1st 25 days of the month. Additionally, you would have a pro-rated allowance to use the last 5 days of (5/30) * 1400 = 233 minutes. This is how the pro-rating works when you make a change effective during the middle of your billing cycle.
What you need to do next time to avoid these overage charges is to make the change effective at the beginning of your current billing cycle. So if you had made the change on 7/19/2012, but your billing cycle ended on 7/24/2012(5 days later), you should have made the change effective at the beginning of your current billing cycle, or 6/24/2012. This is called backdating the change. In this instance, you would have received a credit on you account for the cost of the 700 minute plan and been charged the full amount for the 1400 minute plan on your next bill, which I believe is a net additional charge of $10 and you would have had the use of 1400 minutes for throughout the entire month. In this example, you would not have had any overage with your 675 minutes during the 1st 25 days of your cycle and would have been able to use 725 minutes over the last 5 days of your billing cycle. This is much better than the overage charge you would receive with 92 overage minutes @ $0.45/minute = $41.40.
I hope this explains it.

ORA-00607: Internal error occurred while making a change to a data block

hi
i hv use testing purpose oracle 10 Xe in unix
but when today i hv connect database following error occured
SQL> startup
ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 83886080 bytes
Fixed Size 1257284 bytes
Variable Size 75497660 bytes
Database Buffers 4194304 bytes
Redo Buffers 2936832 bytes
Database mounted.
ORA-00607: Internal error occurred while making a change to a data block
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4193], [625], [640], [], [], [],
I hv check alert log , but no proper solution is given , how can start database

Duh, and of course I missed the significance of
oracle 10 Xe in unix
XE is only supported for Linux - according to the downloads page that means "Debian, Mandriva, Novell, Red Hat and Ubuntu".
Oracle have not publically stated the reasons why XE is only available on Linux and Windows, but my guess is that it is something to do the Intel chip architecture. If this is so it would be possible for Oracle to port XE to run on Solaris for x86. But they have not done so yet.
Which means, alas, that you are unlikely to get any help for this one, because XE is not supported on any unix platform.
Good luck, APC

ICloud is no longer syncing my calendar. I keep the gmail calendar at home on my laptop and at work on my desktop, but my phone isn't making the changes! It used to and I haven't changed anything! Help?

iCloud is no longer syncing my calendar on my phone. I do gmail calendar both at home and at work, but it just stopped making the changes to my phone! I don't think I have changed anything and have run through setting to no avail. Can anyone help on this?

See Here > iCloud: Troubleshooting iCloud Calendar

How to restrict the user from making any changes in Sales order- item level

Hi to all
How to restrict the users from making any changes in sales order at item level if the same sales order is released by senior user through status profile.
Regards
Anish Parikh
Edited by: anish parikh on Jan 24, 2008 5:16 AM

Hi Anish,
This can be achieved through the roles and authorization.
This can be done through the basis team. they can create user profiles and roles.
For the roles they assign some transaction codes so that they can view the only assigned tr. codes.
Like that ur requirement can be done.
Also u can prevent the user to change any fields in the sales order screen (VA02). for that please modify the authorisations.
Hope i answers.
Reward points if useful.
Edited by: kaleeswaran bhoopathy on Jan 24, 2008 9:57 AM

Making parmanent changes to a internal table inside a user exit

Hi All,
I am having a User exit to which I am passing a structure as importing parameter.
The user exit is not exporting the same structure, but is exporting some other values.
My problem is that I want to make parmanent changes in the structure I am passing to the user exit.
Currently what is happening:
I am passing the structure to the user exit. It has got 6 rows. Inside the user exit I am making some changes to a particular field of all the rows. Till the program control is inside the user exit the changes in the structure are visible. As soon as the control come out of the user exit, the values for the field are switched to teh old values(values before passing to teh user exit).
My question is, is there any method to make changes to a internal table inside a user exit and these changes are visible outside it when the program control come out of the user exit. (This is when the internal table to which the change is made in not exported by the user exit)

Hi Dear,
Your changes done in import parameters will not reflect outside exit. You can only change the values of export parameters...
If you have very urgent requirement then make changes in SAP''s Standard code.
For your problem you can write to SAP. In many cases SAP provides the solution.
Award Points If Useful.

User making direct changes to PRD system

My enviroment is ERP 6 ABAP /Oracle 10G/Solaris 10
Some of my superusers are fond of making direct changes to PRD (as opposed to DEV & then transport via the landscape) though changes in PRD system have been restricted through client change options SCC4 & system change option SE06
I suspect the said users have ROLE with powerful authorizations that they ought not to have.
Kindy advice what I should look for the users roles or how I can go about to harden PRD system aganist direct changes
Thanks
Edited by: Andale J on Sep 29, 2010 12:10 PM

Hi BAIGSA
Creation of roles is down to the security policy already in place unless you are lucky enough to be in at the beginning and can define how all roles are to be built in future.
Mostly, you arrive at a client's site and have to adapt to their authorisation concept.
You may find that function (module based) roles are inplace or that job roles (either multiple singles assigned directly or via composites or a one role does all) has been set up.
Remediation of module based roles can be a really pain if they were built with too many transactions included - user group/job roles are far easier to remediate but this depends on the policies in place - inactive objects etc)
I haven't enough information to understand what the changes are that have been made in prod to help - you need to review those changes and formulate a strategy which the business agrees to to resolve.
Kind regards
David
Edited by: David Berry on Oct 3, 2010 8:30 PM

ME53N Prevent user from making a change

How do you prevent a user from making a change to a purchase requistion via transaction ME53N? We want the user to make a change to the purchase requisition using transaction ME52N not transaction ME53N. When the user is in transaction ME53N and clicks on the pencil to change the purchase requisition we want to prevent the user from making any changes by sending a message or force the screen to go to display mode. Thank you in advance.

Sharon,
I don't believe that your exact requirement can be met with standard SAP.
However, this is a very odd requirement. It sounds like you are saying that it is OK for a user to make a PR change in ME52N, but for the same user it is not OK to make a PR change in ME53N.
In most companies, if it is not OK for a user to make a PR change in ME53N, it is therefore also not OK for this user to make a PR change in ANY transaction, including ME52N.
It is a straightforward matter to allow a user access to ME53N and ME52N, but to block his ability to change any PR at any time. If this is your requirement, then consult with your authorization team about the authorization objects that are checked in the ME5* series of transactions. As I recall, it is possible to tailor authorizations (create/change/display etc) by plant, by Purchasing group, by purchasing org,by document type, etc.
Rgds,
DB49

Im having trouble making some changes to our webite. Im using DW CC 2014, 8.1 , HP Pavillion pc. Id be happy to pay someone to help.

im trying to make some changes on our website (oilfiltercrushers.com). Im using DW CC 2014, 8.8, HP Pavion pc. The problems include:trying to move an image farther to the left & also to remove too much vertical space, trying to remove "AAAs tht show up on a webpage table even they don't show on the local file that was put, a webpage that I cant see on the website even though it was put & appears in the remote files folder. Id be happy to pay someone to help me fix these problems. Thanx, Paul ([email protected], 4146514636)

Hi Nancy
Thanx for your response and commenting on our homepage. I wasn't aware of the problems you mentioned. However it has ranked on the first page of Google, etc for 20 years, so that's not my concern at this point.
The 2 most immediate things are getting rid of the A"s showing up on the table on oilfiltercrushers/truck_ofc.aspx and on /defaultnew.aspx , (the intended home page when I get it fixed,) I get a server error highlighting line 293
&nsp;
. Im not sure what to do about that...
I hope you can help me with this. If its more convenient, you can call me at 414-651-4636. I'll pay you for your input.
Paul
I look forward to hearing from you.
Paul
"Nancy O." <[email protected]> wrote:
Nancy O. created the discussion
"Im having trouble making some changes to our webite. Im using DW CC 2014, 8.1 , HP Pavillion pc. Id be happy to pay someone to help."
To view the discussion, visit: https://forums.adobe.com/message/7034503#7034503
>

Getting error when trying to deploy the SQL project after making some changes

I’m getting the below error message, when I’m trying to deploy the project by making some changes.
In detail, The project was deployed successfully at first time. Later I did some changes(Added 1 more table) and I tried to deploy, but it was not sucess. I'm getting the below error message
Error message:Cannot upgrade the DAC for database CTR_FIN_FINNOTE_DB because the compatibility level is 70 or lower. Alter the database to support a compatibility level of 80 or higher
I checked in SQL, the compatibility level is 110 which is higher than 70.
Can any one help me out to overcome with this.
Regards
Sk.

Try to uninstall you application and then deploy again with the new changes.
jdweng

Error: Making this change would require changing code that is locked....

DWCS3
Rebuilding site -- I know this is a common problem, but what are the steps to resolve it?
Error: "Making this change would require changing code that is locked by a template or a translator. The change will be discarded."
Click OK and the change is made anyway, oftentimes resulting in loss of document CSS and dynamic code, which is then unretrievable. EXTREMELY FRUSTRATING!!!
There is another code at the top of all documents using the template:
""
However, this line has always been in my previous documents and created no problem.
The oddest thing is, I can be in an editable region of a document, click on an image to edit in Fireworks, edit, click DONE and it comes back in DW with that error. ???

Looking at DW preferences, I found two Fireworks editors listed for .png, .gif, and .jpg. Maybe that was causing a problem.
Don't know if this will help, but....
Here is sort of what my template code looks like:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

        <head>
       
<meta name="keywords" content="blah blah blah" />
<meta name="description" content="blah blah blah/>
<meta name="robots" content="noarchive, nofollow" />
<meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache" />
<meta http-equiv="cache-control" content="no-cache" />
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<meta name="google-site-verification" content="8KWIMcjzjngBlH7XsAnwF4W5M_novbbavDYWk2YIZgk" />
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/favicon.ico" />
          
    
<title>document title</title>
          
                
                <link href="../CSS/file.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
                <link href="../CSS/file.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<script type="text/javascript">

</script>
        
</head>
Here's code from a document using the template:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

        <head>
       
<meta name="robots" content="noarchive, nofollow" />
<meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache" />
<meta http-equiv="cache-control" content="no-cache" />
          
    
<title>my document title</title>
<script type="text/javascript">
function toggleMe(a) {
var e=document.getElementById(a);
if(!e)return true;
if(e.style.display=="none") {
e.style.display="block"
else{
e.style.display="none"
return true;
</script>
                
                <link href="CSS/file.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
                <link href="CSS/file.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
        <script type="text/javascript">

</script>
<style type="text/css">

                 </style>

</head>

Making this change would require code that is locked by a template or a translator. The change will be discarded.

I apologize if this has been answered before, but I can't
seem to find a solution in the forum archive. The error message
below displays in Dreamweaver CS3 when I attempt to edit a
Fireworks CS3 file using the "Edit" button in Dreamweaver. After
clicking "Done" in Firworks to update the file and return to my
HTML page in Dreamweaver, the error message displays. Can someone
help me troubleshoot the problem? As a side note, I tested it in my
older version of Dreamweaver and Fireworks (studio 8 versions) to
see if I would get the same error message and I didn't - everything
worked fine and no error message displayed.
DW Error Message: Making this change would require code that
is locked by a template or a translator. The change will be
discarded.
Thanks for your help,
Donna

> Murray, what do you mean? My pages validated before the
switch to DW8.
Are you sure? Show us one.
The error you describe is only thrown in one of two cases -
1. You have actually changed what is being mentioned (sadly
this is most
often NOT the case)
2. You have a coding error somewhere on the page (or in the
CSS) that is
causing the template engine to burp this error message even
though it
doesn't really apply
DW4 was nearly totally unaware of 'validation' errors. DW8 is
MUCH stricter
about them. When anyone says "this was fine in DW4 and is now
not fine in
DW8" this is the first and most likely solution.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"Inge Grotjahn" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
> Am 13.09.2007 schrieb Murray *ACE*:
>
>> DW4 was much more tolerant of errors in your code
than DW8 is. Your
>> symptoms are an absolute diagnostic for such errors.
>
> Murray, what do you mean? My pages validated before the
switch to DW8.
> I only imported my site from DW4 and used the existing
templates.
> After changes of the template I used DW's feature to
update all
> relevant pages automatically. Then I wondered, why I
couldn't make
> changes on the child-pages within the editable regions.
Finally I
> created the template page new in DW8 and applied the new
template to
> all my pages. Now it is working fine, although my pages
still state,
> that they relate to a DW6 template, which I never had?
>
> Best regards:-)
> Inge Grotjahn, puzzled:-)
> --
> CatManiacs World:
http://www.gwsystems.com/inge

How to restrict one user making DDL changes in another schema

can anyone please let me know the way to restrict a user making the DDL changes Through Procedure (This user have the execute privilege on procedure owner by another schema) on another schema.
Let say we have schema A and B. our requirement is, The User A should grant execute privilege on all the procedure that are created on A to user B, but if at all there is a situation a procedure is created with DDL changes(with execute immediate option) and gave the execute privilege to the user B, Then user B can make DDL changes through this procedure. i wanted to restrict user B making DDL changes any way to user A .
Appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Karthik

Your requirement doesn't sound terribly sensible. If you want B to be able to execute the procedure, grant B access to the procedure. If you don't want B to be able to execute the procedure, don't grant B access. If you are concerned that someone is going to change the code in the procedure after it is created to transform it from something that you want B to have access to into something that you don't want B to have access to, you should be reviewing changes before they are promoted.
If you're really determined to do things "uniquely", I suppose you could create a DDL trigger that looks to see who the user is and throws an exception if it is B. But that seems like a poor second choice to dealing with the problem sensibly from the outset.
If you aren't reviewing the changes and building code that tries to check whether something bad got slipped in, you're going to be fighting a losing battle. If you write a DDL trigger that checks the user, for example, and I'm a developer that's intent on creating holes, I could simply add code to a procedure that submits a dbms_job that executes DDL. That job would run as A so your DDL trigger would let it pass. Of course, you could then turn around and disable DBMS_JOB in which case I could use DBMS_SCHEDULER instead. You could disable that as well but then you're disabling the scheduler jobs that Oracle runs by default for things like gathering statistics. And then the rogue developer simply moves on to the next hole to exploit.
Justin

Making Enharmonic changes to a score?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for