MAM 2.5 - NW04s - seeking installation and post setup Instructions

I'm running NW04s SP13, MI 7.0 and I'm trying to uprade mam to SP6.
1. Is there any current documentation on how to install MAM 2.5 on NW04s
2. Is there any step by step instructions on how to apply MAM 2.5 SP 6
Thanks.
Henry

Hi Henry,
all MAM publicly available documentation is published on service marketplace:
https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/swdc -> Release and Upgrade Info -> Installation and Upgrade Guides -> SAP xAps -> SAP xApps for Mobile Business -> SAP xMAM -> MAM2.5. You can find installation guide there.
Regards,
Larissa Limarova

Similar Messages

PI (XI 7.0) Installation and Post Installation Guides

We have installed XI 3.0 with previous clients, and we are trying to install XI 7.0 (PI) for a client on Windows 2003 SQL server. We looked for installation documents in the service.sap.com, but we were confused about which documents to follow.
Has anyone installed PI (XI 7.0) from scratch? If yes, could you provide us documents regarding installation and post installation steps. What are the differences in installing XI 3.0 and PI?
You help is greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
Karma

Hey Karma,
You dont need any guide for PI post installation.
There is a facility in NW 2004s for completing post installation, they provide with templates. you just have to execute the templates and your PI post config is done.
first execute
NWD
and then
PI templates
After this import the BASIS components into design environment.
Regards
Ramesh P

SAP PI7.0 installation and post installation procidure needed

Hi,
I am installing the SAP PI7.0 my O/S is IBM AIX 6.0 and 570 H/W.
Can any one give me the Installation and post installation procedure?

you can find
www.service.sap.com/instguides

SCCM installation and post requirements

I have searched several threads regarding the permission prerequisites for SCCM installation but have not found one that cleary addresses my question.
I have setup the appropriate permissions with the SCCM computer accounts and site installation service account added
to the local administrators group on the SQL server. Is this access still needed for post SCCM installation or can it be reduces once installation is complete?
I would like to remove the SCCM computer accounts from the SQL local admin group post installation and reduce the SCCM service account from the sysadmin role on SQL.
What is the supported configuration post installation?

The official response is that we require admin rights to all site system computers, even after installation. There are ongoing tasks we perform after installation that will fail and generate errors/status messages if you were to remove it.
With that said, for SQL Server:
If the customer removes the local admininstrators group from the SQL sysadmin then we still work.
Hi Wally,
do you mean the SQL sysadmin right for SCCM installation service account is not required after the installation? is it officially supported by Microsoft?

Thinking of pre installation and post installation

Hi,
I understand the following is very common question, but I need to know the answer specific to my case.
my case:
My production database has around 100 tables in a single database/instance (no clusterred yet); 3 of tables are growiing very fast, in less than 1 month can use more than 1TB hard disk space, and we have to keep 6 months' data (so in a half year, disk space will be used up 6-10 TB by these 3 tables; every day there are lots of operations on these tables, update, insert and query (no delete, every operation invoked heavy API stored precedure.
questions.
1. if applying cluster, installing in 2 nodes, 5 nodes, 10 nodes, can I expect linear performance increasing to 15%,18%,20%?
2. install nodes in one physical box (usiing vmware) better or 1 node 1 box better, in terms of performance?
3. afer installing Grid, the database install in one of those node or iin another box?
4. any doc telling how to install/configure the database upon cluster/nodes?
Thanks
John

992202 wrote:
Firstly install nodes, to be able to build up a cluster, on top of it, install multiple database instances, then we can configure a RAC database, which will still look like a single database from external client point of view.Correct. Grid installation first to build the cluster. Then RAC installation to provide a cluster database infrastructure across grid nodes. Then create a physical cluster database with a database engine on each cluster node.
now going to the point how I think and expect performance increasing against my case.
without clustered database (say in a standalone or singleton instance), executing 100 database operation (query, insert, update, by calling API, stored procedures) takes 5 minute; now in RAC database in which 5 nodes, 5 database instances in 5 physical machines, 100 operation may distribute to all nodes, namely each database instance may just need to handle 20 request (ideally); this way performance should be increased lots.Emphasis on should.
Yes, RAC provides for scalability. However, no cluster (RAC and anything else) is capable of simply taking any program (or stored procedure), and make that now run faster across multiple cluster nodes.
The program (stored proc or SQL in RAC's case) need to be able to run in parallel, deal with concurrency, and do this in a thread-safe way. The cluster provides the tools for this. The program needs to support or use these tools.
And, I also think, in 10 nodes cluster, it's better that installs 10 database instances than installing only 5, in terms of performance.Of course, you want to use all cluster nodes. But you can for example create server pools in the cluster and more than one cluster database - and run these on your cluster. A cluster does not necessarily mean only supporting a single cluster database.
A report shows CPU usage is very high constantly during executing (now we use 32 CPU in one box), however I/O and network usages look normal.Unlikely that a RAC will do better in this case - running processes within the same h/w boundary on 32 CPUs will usually be faster than running the same processing across 16 server nodes, with 2 CPUs per server.
Can I still expect linear performance increasing? if no, what can RAC database help me out, or any other way can help me my case?As I said - RAC provides incredible scalability (e.g. my biggest RAC does up to 35,000 rows inserts per second, and uses parallel processing to process 30+ million row data sets using several table joins in less than 120 seconds).
But for any cluster - scalability needs to be part and parcel of the software loads run on that cluster. If the workload of the software cannot be parallelised, if workloads are not designed to be scalable, then no amount of clustering will improve the runtimes of such workloads.
My suggestion is to first identify the CPU related performance problem you have. You need to know WHAT the problem is, in order to decide on how to address it. And whether RAC is a solution to the performance problem.

Time Warner Road Runner and iCloud setup instructions

I use Time Warner Road Runner for email on my MacBook Pro, my iPad, and my iPhone. I'm confused about how to set up syncing mail using iCloud and a .me mail address when my email has a road runner address. Is there a good step by step instruction available? Do I have to change my .rr email address to one using .me?

I have the same issue. I thouhgt my email would "sync" like my work Outlook emial account, but they do not. If you find a solution, please share!

I want pre and post portal installation guide for EP 7.0 ?

Please give me links for portal(EP 7.0).Installation guide for pre and post installation steps to be followed.

Hi,
Refer this thread
Portal 7.0 Installation Document/Screen Shots
Portal 7.0 (ECC 6.0) Installation
Regards,
Senthil K.

3 posts in one on the Leopard "installation and setup" forum

I just posted a topic "Cannot disable trackpad pinch open & close" on the Leopard "installation and setup" forum and the topic was posted 3 times.
I first previewed my post, then posted the message from the preview pane. Interestingly, it took the forum server a very long time to display the preview pane ... and then a very long time (several minutes) to post the message after i clicked the post button.
I did not get impatient and click any buttons twice ... I just waited, and somehow the message got posted 3 times. I can believe I did something inadvertent on my end ... but impatiently hitting the preview and post buttons while waiting was not it.
If someone with power can remove 2 of the 3 repetitions, I'd appreciate it ... I couldn't figure out how to delete them myself

fiddleaway wrote:
Thanks. Is there a direct channel to the moderators anyone can use in circumstances like this?
This is it. The Feedback forum is the place to post requests for the Hosts.
I'd like to find out why my posting actions are generating multiple postings.
This has been happening to many people and as Terence mentions seems to be a fault in the forum software. Some have noticed that it occurs when there appears to be a server lag. That is, they'll click the button to post and there will be a long lag in response from the web site, and then even though they never clicked another button, several posts will appear.
It's not anything you did.

Satellite U840W PSU5XA - Win 8.1 installation and effective SSD usage

Hello.
Im hoping for a solution to two issues.
The second I suspect is caused by the first.
Satellite U840W PSU5XA-001006
Started to receive BSOD with various faults.
Most persistant was IRQ LESS or not EQUAL- iaStorAV.sys
Many hours of searching and I cannot locate a solution nor post that actually has the "AV" extension on on iaStore.sys.....
So, i factory resetted, and various other issues (BSOD's) persisted.
So, I Clean installed Windows 8.1 straight over everything and deleted all previous files.
I noticed the system was not running any factory TOSHIBA Branded utilities etc. and seemed to be a lot slower. I suspected that this was caused due to the 32GB SSD used for Cache had now seemingly been bi-passed and everything was now strictly running off the 500GB HDD. I dont recall BSOD's but the system was significantly slower on boot and performance.
Sooooo, (SIGH), I again reset back to factory settings and this gave me back TOSHIBA branded utilities such as service station and the like.
HOWEVER, The BSOD's remained and once upgrading to windows 8.1 KEEPING files and settings, the iaStorAV.sys error has returned (specifically when closing lid into sleep mode) forcing CRITICAL error and forcing system into reboot instead of awakening from sleep.
Note: Windows is a legit MS copy so that isnt the issue either. Even stranger is that the 8.1 instal had been running at least 8 months no issue prior to sudden BSOD Page file and iaStorAV errors. Readings and posts have me believing MS Updates to bee the culprit here for the beginning of these issues.
I read a similar post regarding enabling RAID CACHE PRIOR to Windows 8.1 install. My intuition tells me that these two may just be related. i.e. If windows has not installed RAID CACHE properly, then CACHE isnt being strored correctly and causing BSOD's. Im a newbie at this stuff, so be patient.....
What I really want to know is, How can I now Factory Reset Windows 8, making positive the 32GB is being used as CACHE and assisting fastboot etc, then safely upgrade to Windows 8.1?
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
THINGS ALSO ATTEMPTED: IRST and RAID re-Install, Memory Diagnostic (Passed), BIOS Upgrade to 6.70, Rapid Storage Drivers re-installed
Thanks ahead of time,
Mr Frustrated............

Ok, well, its been a while and no-one had really come up with a solid solution. But thank you JakieStewart for the RST information.
Note: Updating RST drivers alone, failed....
However, I have been able to work around the issue in a way:
I have lost the ability to use the SSD as a cache, which really annoys me, as all the reboots, and suggestions i have read, re-installs etc proved flawed in some way or another.
So, I have instead chosen to clean install windows 8.1 then followed a post relating to Diskpart and setting SSD hibernation partition.
A link to consider would be http://download.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/sb/rapid_start_technology_user_guide.pdf
However i followed a somewhat abbreviated version.
Conclusion:
1. Now I can close the lid on my U840W (INTO SLEEP or HIBERNATION Mode and not get a "System Thread Exception iaStorAV.sys error because I have 1. Reluctantly Clean Installed Windows 8.1 over factory image and 2. now created a >Hibernation Partition< on the SSD
Even though SSD Cache may no longer be available, creating this Hibernation Partition assists with Rapid START Technology and the associated iaStorAV.sys type errors
You can find your Toshiba Rapid Store Technology Drivers for your model here:
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/search?keyword=Intel%C2%AE+Rapid+Storage+Technolog y+%28Intel%C2%AE+RST%29
2. I no longer have the option to use the SSD as a cache, but overall my system runs a lot better now
3. The SSD is not visible in explorer (which it never was under the original settings anyway)
3. Downside: I can no longer boot or reset back to original Toshiba factory settings and can only recover from the new recovery disk (USB) i have made.
I have now also downloaded and stored on a USB all the original TOSHIBA U840W Drivers from http://www.mytoshiba.com.au/support/computers/ultrabook/u840w/psu5xa-001006/download?os=30
If like me, you clean install windows 8.1 I highly suggest getting your drivers downloaded locally so that you don't have to keep going back to Toshiba or Intel unless updates are required.
4. Note: Make note to set the BIOS Hibernation mode to "Immediately" if you choose to go this route as per the instructions on the Intel Link
5. Change "Toshiba Power Options" to make sure that closing Lid send laptop into Sleep or Hibernation (Both work) Do this by searching for "power options' in windows charm search and >select power plan >Change power plan settings >Change Advanced Power Settings >Power Button and Lid >selecting either Sleep or Hibernation (both work as i said earlier)
ON THE PRO SIDE: My HDD boot from total Shutdown State time is "about" 50 seconds but more significantly, closing the lid into sleep keeps my work available again, and takes 9.5 seconds to boot from sleep into usable actions!!!!
So despite losing SSD Cache, I now know a lot more about my computer, and the sleep function and Hibernation work supremely well.
I hope someone finds this thread useful...
Shane
Laslty, it is sooooo strange how this all happened overnight with the iaStora.sys; iaStorAV.sys iaStora.sys errors...and how restoring back to previous states didn't work, and how it seemingly corrupted even the Flash Stored Cache settings and Operating System! At least I now understand my computer better and luckily this didn't occur during previous Diploma studies. Phew.....
Message was edited by: shaner1

Installation and performance wonderful!

Just completed installation and testing of Aperture 3. 20K images, mostly RAW from Canon 40D and 5DM2 (11 to 23 MB RAW files), around 300GB.
Ran Consistency Check and then Rebuild on Aperture 2 libraries before starting move to Aperture 3.
Backed up Aperture 2 Libraries on several hard drives (belt and suspenders).
Installed from Ap 3 disk.
Did software updates re slideshows and new RAW update.
Turned off Faces (can run this later).
Did not reprocess files, just the update. I will reprocess as needed, when I want to use new tools on old files.
Update on both Mac Pro (2006, 2.66GHZ, 7GB ram) and MacBook Pro (2008, 2.5 GHZ, 4 GB ram). No other application slowed down at all during update. Update took about two hours on each machine.
Library and adjustments are very snappy.
Printing went exceedingly well, after re-entering my presets.
Image Browser shows Aperture library.
Not a single problem so far. I've spent almost a week reading the posts here and I've seen all the problems some people have had.
In my view, a very, very impressive new version.

I know it really probably will not help but I submitted a bug report.
"17-Feb-2010 12:16 PM Brian Hursey:
Summary:
Major issue with Aperture 3 when converting A2 library's and projects to A3.
Steps to Reproduce:
Senerio 1. Open an existing aperture library. It tells you you will need to convert the library conversion only gets to about 5%.
Senerio 2. Importing and not converting an existing A2 library into a A3 library.
Senerio 3. Reprocessing masters on a imported A2 project.
Expected Results:
Conversion, importing processing needs to keep from locking up the system and making it unusable.
Actual Results:
Uses all systems resources and creates a 43+ gig swap file. Used 100% of both cores of my 2.0 ghz 2009 mac mini, and used all of the ram.
Regression:
System: Spring 2009 Mac mini. 2.0 ghz core duo, 2 gigs of DDR3 ram, Snow Leopard 10.6.2 , Aperture 3.
Notes:
Possible work a rounds 32bit mode will test tonight. "

I have the new Oracle 8i installer and here is why

I have been trying to get Oracle 8i on Linux and I feel that I
must share
my thoughts on the new Oracle installer with everybody.
I hate the new installer. I used to run the installer from
home over my
128Kbps connection while I was connected to the office machines,
because it
was simple text based. And Oracle 8i has changed all that!
I have nothing against GUI based installers, only when they have
a little too
many animated images that eat up bandwidth. I had to drive all
the way to
the office because I did not have sufficient bandwidth to display
the darn
ringing bell animated image. This is strictly the mentality of
Windows users
who like to work on the console of servers.
And check this out:
line 118 in my install log file at :
/usr/local/oracle/u01/app/oracle/oraInventory/logs/installActions.log
says :
platGroup = WINDOWS
And this is on Linux!!! Maybe the Oracle folks are forgetting
that Linux
users are a little too sensitive to these kind of mistakes. :)
This also supports my theory that the new installer is a gift
from Windows
programmers. Who are not too familiar with the idea of being
able to send
their video display to any computer around the world and work
from there.
A feature every Linux user takes for granted
There are numerous other bugs in the installer and other routines
of Oracle
8i for Linux. Some of them I will list here:
2. The installation types screen list 3 options:
Typical, Minimal and Custom.
Somehow Minimal takes more disk space (642 MB) compared to
Typical (585 MB).
Well that is what the installation screen says. I have not tried
to install
using the minimal install.
3. The installation cant figure out how much free space is
available on the /
partition. Is it that hard? Its gives warnings about how I may
not have
enough space.
4. dbassist cant find the cdrom if you try to install the default
database
from CDROM. It says cannot find CDROM even if you have all your
stuff under
/mnt/cdrom
5. The docs talk about software mount points and data mount
points /u01 /u02
/u03 and /u04 that I created, but I could not find anywhere to
specify them
like I was able to, with the last release.
6. "Oracle Protocol Support" section during the install shows no
options at
all. What happened to good ole Net8?
And many others. This product is a joke.
Atif.
[email protected]
null

My sentiments exactly. There are so many bugs in the
installation of this release that I have just about given up.
And I haven't even started testing the new features yet!
I've tried the install on RedHat 6.0 straight out of the box (no
patches or updates applied) and followed the OIG and release
notes to the letter. Clearly, no one at Oracle did the same,
because there are many problems during install. I finally got a
simple database running, but there are some real gotcha's along
the way.
Here are just a few of the bugs I've encountered:
1. Zero length library file $ORACLE_HOME/lib/libnjni8.so.
Netasst doesn't work without it. Someone said they posted the
source code to the comp.databases.oracle.server newsgroup, but I
can't find it.
2. Database Creation Assistant thinks dbmssql.sql is called
dbmssml.sql.
3. Building the Intelligent Agent with TCL 7.5 causes a cascade
of undefined references when running gmake -f ins_oemagent.mk
agent
4. Database Creation Assistant doesn't understand OFA. It wants
to put all of the database files /u01/app/oracle/oradata/<sid> !
5. Database Creation Assistant will sometimes prevent editing
the data file names to put them in OFA compliant directories.
I am appreciative of the free developer licenses for so many
Oracle products, but this is the worst Oracle install I've had
in 12 years.
Atif (guest) wrote:
: I have been trying to get Oracle 8i on Linux and I feel that I
: must share
: my thoughts on the new Oracle installer with everybody.
: I hate the new installer. I used to run the installer from
: home over my
: 128Kbps connection while I was connected to the office
machines,
: because it
: was simple text based. And Oracle 8i has changed all that!
: I have nothing against GUI based installers, only when they
have
: a little too
: many animated images that eat up bandwidth. I had to drive all
: the way to
: the office because I did not have sufficient bandwidth to
display
: the darn
: ringing bell animated image. This is strictly the mentality of
: Windows users
: who like to work on the console of servers.
: And check this out:
: line 118 in my install log file at :
: /usr/local/oracle/u01/app/oracle/oraInventory/logs/installActio
ns.log
: says :
: platGroup = WINDOWS
: And this is on Linux!!! Maybe the Oracle folks are forgetting
: that Linux
: users are a little too sensitive to these kind of mistakes. :)
: This also supports my theory that the new installer is a gift
: from Windows
: programmers. Who are not too familiar with the idea of being
: able to send
: their video display to any computer around the world and work
: from there.
: A feature every Linux user takes for granted
: There are numerous other bugs in the installer and other
routines
: of Oracle
: 8i for Linux. Some of them I will list here:
: 2. The installation types screen list 3 options:
: Typical, Minimal and Custom.
: Somehow Minimal takes more disk space (642 MB) compared to
: Typical (585 MB).
: Well that is what the installation screen says. I have not
tried
: to install
: using the minimal install.
: 3. The installation cant figure out how much free space is
: available on the /
: partition. Is it that hard? Its gives warnings about how I
may
: not have
: enough space.
: 4. dbassist cant find the cdrom if you try to install the
default
: database
: from CDROM. It says cannot find CDROM even if you have all
your
: stuff under
: /mnt/cdrom
: 5. The docs talk about software mount points and data mount
: points /u01 /u02
: /u03 and /u04 that I created, but I could not find anywhere to
: specify them
: like I was able to, with the last release.
: 6. "Oracle Protocol Support" section during the install shows
no
: options at
: all. What happened to good ole Net8?
: And many others. This product is a joke.
: Atif.
: [email protected]
null

Windows 8 64-bit, failed installations and RAID 1 resync on HP ENVY h8-1520z

I recently purchased an HP Envy h8-1520z with a single SSD and 8 GB RAM running Windows 8 Pro 64-bit. I installed 2 Western Digital 500 GB WDC WD5000AAKX-001CA0 HDDs on SATA ports 5 & 6 and configured them as RAID 1 in the BIOS. I have started installing apps on the RAID 1 array (E since the SSD is only 256 GB.
While installing software, some install fine, but often the installation hangs with no errors indicated and I have to kill the installer task through task manager. I usually follow that with a system shutdown or restart and almost every time that results in a resync of the RAID array. Sometimes the shutdown or restart is quick, and other times it takes several minutes with intermittent disk activity as indicated by the drive light. I have sometimes given up after 10 minutes or so and powered down by holding down the power button. I can understand a resync after the forced power down, but it seems that all it takes to cause a resync is a failed installation, and that seem to happen a lot, even with software that explicitly says it is Windows 8 compatible. Sometimes the applications run fine even after an apparently failed installation and other times not so much.
Has anybody else seen this behavior or have any suggestions? I’d like to get this sorted out before I load any more software.

Hi,
Did you check each hard drive for straps? There should not be any straps installed on the hard drive. These drives do have strapping posts.
Did you use the AMD RaidExpert to create the array volume? Did you wait until the RAID migration was complete before using the array volume?
Check the AMD RaidExpert for errors. It's possible that you have a bad hard drive(s).
Many applications want to be installed on the C drive. Your SSD is 256GB so you should have plenty of space for most applications and the application performance will be improved. Use the RAID 1 array to keep and store your data. The mirroring process of RAID 1 will protect it in case one hard drive fails.
You might want to consider removing all of the data etx.. from the array, use the AMD RAIDExpert to delete out the array volume. I would then run for hard drive diagnostics. If the hard drives are free from errors then use disk management to separately reformat each hard drive. Now go back to the AMD RaidExpert and create your new array volume.
Be sure to review the software and bios updates for your PC.
HP DV9700, t9300, Nvidia 8600, 4GB, Crucial C300 128GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium C309G, HP Photosmart 6520
HP Touchpad, HP Chromebook 11
Custom i7-4770k,Z-87, 8GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650,GTX 760
Custom i7-4790k,Z-97, 16GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Plextor M.2 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650, GTX 660TI
Windows 7/8 UEFI/Legacy mode, MBR/GPT

BW upgrade - pre and post upgrade reports

Hi All
Quick question please.
We plan to upgrade our BW ABAP system from NW 731 SPS7 to NW 740 SPS6.
I read the ASU toolbox note 1000009 and can see that there is no file for our scenario i..e from 73X to 740 so note 1734333 is the way to go here when prompted for ASU toolbox run. However within the note 1734333, it states "This note requires that all pre-requisites for the BW-related system copy automation are met according to note 1707321". When i read 1707321 it talks about installation procedure for PCA which is part of LVM, a licensed software. We don't have this license. Hence I am wondering if note 1707321 is applicable for us at all or is it that this note would bring about changes in the system and sets up a staging area upon which the Z report from the other note(1734333) builds and then creates task list for pre and post upgrade. I am certain that we will have to implement Z report from note 1734333 however the reference to note 1707321 has created some confusion.
Also once we implement the Z report from 1734333, the note says, the report needs not be transferred but the objects generated need to be. Would the author here referring to reports - SAP_BW_BEFORE UPGRADE and SAP_BW_AFTER UPGRADE and having them recorded into a transport. Any thoughts here please. If the author is indeed referring to these reports only, how do we know this will show up in quality systems via STC01 as input options.
Regards
Kalyan

I re-read the note again, It says, If task manager content notes(1707321) are not applied, we will not see reports for stopping RDA Daemons and Process chains i...e report RS_SYSTEM_SHUTDOWN. However we are on NW 731 SP7 so we already have this report. This means we can go ahead with implementing the Z report from 1734333 and forget about the other note. Have I comprehended it correctly
Regards
Kalyan

Windows 10 Enterprise Edition: Installation and Development Environment Essentials: Thoughts & Assistance Req:

Hello,
I am in the architecture planning stage of my project and seeking personal and general good advice from Mircosoft engineers. I am laying the foundation stones of a new development product using at least three more new technologies that are
as new as Windows 10. Their are also around four or five technology partners with the latest version of their software that I wish to take onboard. Due to the sensitive nature of the project it is not wise for me to state each piece of technology used,
so I will be as accurate as possible using the limited means I have.
I wish to make a "closed" development environment, with the latest build (currently 9860), install the new software. Some of which installs fine, some of which is not compatabile with Windows 10. Regarding the latter I am in discussions with the
technology providers to make a work-around and hammer and chisel through every issue. Very soon I hope to have a fully stable working development environment which paves the road to a first prototype. So i need to make a decision soon to "lock
down" everything. I will miss Windows 10 updates but the advantage is when the project vertical slice is complete, the feedback and benefit will be larger for Windows 10 final product.
This is probably my fifth or sixth early evaluation of the Windows platform and I am aware of the highs and lows of working with various versions using new builds, from the stability of win98 (becoming 2000 - minus millennium 1999 edition), to the quick uninstall
of vista (it broke our internal projects). The solid bedrock of Windows NT (becoming XP) and so on. The good news is Windows 10 seems very good indeed.
My questions are two:
1) Would the windows team recommend a closed environment development in my situation, and are they aware of other developers doing it (is it wise from your end)? Is their a pool, can we communicate directly?
or
2) Would you recommend an open environment instead? Every install is updated, everything is all on-line and networked, this may lead to more breakages and sacrifice the finished product.
The problem with approach number 2 is that a particular technology may work with this build, but not the next one and vice versa. I will constantly be playing "bunny hop" trying to make it work.
The problem with using number 1 is that you can have a "false dawn" view of the project, meaning you have managed to get it stable and develop code that fits that environment and build, but as soon as you do update six months later, it breaks due
to feature change, it means massive re-work, ultimately breaking the product again.
I have seen these approaches drown larger projects and wash away whole development teams.
Its a tough one and a part of my R&D but very soon I need to make a decision.
To explain more, some of the technology used will be:
Windows 10 Enterprise - Perforce - Office 365 with Exchange Activ Synch - Any associated Intel CPU and GPU monitors.
In other words very stable and solid technology. Their is about an equal number of other techs that are not so stable but I am slowly getting to work under Windows 10.All feedback would be given to Microsoft, regardless of environment 1 or 2.
Any advice and help from the Microsoft Team is greatly appreciated.
Yours Kindly,
Asad

I recently went to an Enterprise Mobility Summit Microsoft was holding at one of their facilities, and they spoke a bit about the future of Windows 10 - and here's what I left with: Microsoft isn't really sure themselves what kind of updating scheme they're
going to be doing with Windows 10. They had some ideas, but they're looking for feedback from enterprises and engineers about their plan.
I don't think it was under an NDA, so I should have no problem discussing it: their idea was to have different tracks (based on the user) with different upgrade schedules based on what the administrator deems appropriate for that user. For instance,
a consumer would have their OS automatically updated as soon as the update was available. while enterprises could stagger their users to a more manageable 3-month or 6-month schedule. Microsoft wasn't sure how long to make this stagger schedule - talk
of a 1 year stagger were floated, but nothing concrete. Critical devices, like POS or ATMs, could be setup so they would never be upgraded, or only upgraded when the administrator specifically allows them to be upgraded.
For you personally, it sounds like a closed development environment is better, since you're testing critical business applications. Again, one never knows exactly what direction Microsoft will take, but with the amount of conversations and...
warnings that dropped by various people at this meeting, it's pretty safe to say that they'll be some sort of timed release schedule for enterprises that you can prepare for.
Hope that helps!

Oracle 11g Server Installation and Configuration

Hi All..
I would like to know the estimate(in detail) for Oracle 11g Server Installation and Configuration.
This is for a server and we might even need to replicate the entire DB.
Can any on please help me out in this .
Thank you

Hi,
Please post your question in the [Database |http://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=18] forum.
Regards,
Hussein

MAM 2.5 - NW04s - seeking installation and post setup Instructions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for