Managing photos in aperture

I'm feeling pretty stupid and frustrated.  I just went through and deleted maybe 200 photos that I didn't want.  (Of course, I wouldn't need to do this if all my photos were excellent when I took them!)  I was using Aperture, and of course deleted versions.  Then, I did a batch rename.  What I think I've learned since having done that is that 1) I never deleted the photos I thought I was getting rid of and, 2) that I only renamed them in Aperture and then, it was a version I renamed and not the original.
So, I go to Photoshop to work on the photos...and guess what...everything I thought I deleted is still there (in Photos, which is where I save them) with the original jpg. file name.
If I want to change the original file (like delete it or rename it) is there a way to do that in Aperture, or is my only option using Finder?  The task of going back and redoing everthing I did yesterday is daunting, but I don't think I have a choice.

If I want to change the original file (like delete it or rename it) is there a way to do that in Aperture, or is my only option using Finder?
First of all - don't use the Finder with Aperture! You will be in for a lot of trouble otherwise. If you are using Aperture, let Aperture manage the media files, otherwise you are risking an inconsistent Aperture library. You can and should use Aperture to delete and to rename your files, even the original files.
I am not quite sure about, what you have done exactly and what you wanted to achieve.
I just went through and deleted maybe 200 photos that I didn't want.
How did you delete the images? 
So, I go to Photoshop to work on the photos...and guess what...everything I thought I deleted is still there (in Photos, which is where I save them) with the original jpg. file name.
Is your Aperture library referenced, and you can see the original image files in a folder in the "Photos" folder?
To delete images in Aperture reveal them in their project, select them in the Browser, and select "File > Delete Version" or "File > Delete Original Image and all Versions" from the main menu bar, depending on if you want to delete the current version or all versions and the original image file as well. If you did it this way, did you remember to empty the Aperture Trash?
To rename your original files use "Metadata > Batch change" and select a preset for the version name. Then check the button "Apply to Original file". This will rename the originals as well.
Regards
Léonie
Added: I see, Frank Caggiano has already answered this

Similar Messages

  • Is it possible to create Panoramic photos in Aperture

    I know it is possible to create Panoramic photos in PS, but was wondering if it is also possibel in Aperture.

    Imho ( ) it is worth understanding the difference between Aperture and programs like it (LR, etc.), and Photoshop.  The difference is compositing.  PS and other Graphics programs are built from the ground up as compositors.  Aperture and its cousins are Digital Asset Managers and digital photo development tools.  You use Aperture to manage your collection of digital photos, and to make any one photo into the best version possible for whatever use you have.  Then you export your digital photos from Aperture, and use them in graphics programs to create new graphics.
    In general, if you are combining things (text, geometric primitives, multiple graphic elements, etc.), you use a graphics program; if you are optimizing a photo for a particular use, you can do it using Aperture.
    For panoramas, I import the photos I'm going to use into Aperture, Stack them and add a color label (so I can see at a glance that these Images are part of that kind of series), check the WB, the export them to a temporary Finder folder.  I use Hugin to open all the exported files and stitch them together.  Then I import the panorama I created using Hugin and place it as the Stack Pick of the Stack, and make whatever additional adjustments I want for the use I have for the panorama.
    Message was edited by: Kirby Krieger

  • Itunes 11 shows zero photos in Aperture and ApertureData.xml not being created in library

    I've tried to do some trouble shooting of this problem. I've rebuilt permissions, I've repaired and rebuilt the Aperture library, I've made sure sharing previews is always for iLife and iWork, I've created a new library, switched to it and switched back and I can't get iTunes to see my albums and pictures from my iPhoto library when I try to sync through Aperture. What I have found is when I created the new temporary library and loaded one pic into it, a file in the package contents called ApertureData.xml is created, which isn't created in the iPhoto libary, it has AlbumData.xml. iTunes does recognize the temp library and photo. I deleted the AlbumData.xml, but it was just recreated. It seems Aperture is supposed to be creating a file that it isn't. Any help would be appreciated, I'm trying to migrate from iPhoto to using Aperture exclusively to manage photos and sync with devices. All software is up to date. Thanks. 

    in case anyone searches and finds this question, but importing by iphoto library to aperture into a new library, I fixed the problem. I do not know how to fix the original issue of the aperturedata.xml not being created in the origianl iphoto library.

  • Best way to manage photos?

    So I don't manage photo's on my iphone very much. I dont' need to, but my parents (not very technical) do take a lot of photo's with their phones. On occassion, there is a need to make more room on the iphone, so I'm starting to teach them that the photo's should be sent to the (windows) pc, but they don't want all of the pics to be removed from the iphone.
    Currently I'm not sitting in fromt of a pc with iTunes on it, but is it possible to do this in iTunes? Or is a good reason to use the Photo Stream feature on iCloud?.Or can I sync just certain albums (without Photo Stream / iCloud) , if I show them how to move pictures to other albums?
    I'm looking for the best / easist way for them to manage their photo's, without having much user interaction. At most, maybe plug it in and that's it.
    Suggestions would be welcome.
    Thanks
    Murph

    How about an Express Card/34 Flash Card Reader that should be faster than an old USB one. 
    Aperture looks good for Photo Management.
    This forum is for discussions about Apple Discussions themselves; you'll get better answers if you post in a more relevant forum.
    regards
    mrtotes

  • Managing photos on the iPad

    I can't get the hang of managing photos on the iPad. I have 2,000 photos and the only choice I see is to delete all of them or keep them? What is the best way of managing the photos?

    I can tell you what I've done that works well for me.  On my iMac, I created a set of folders that contain various photos.  The folders on the iMac have descriptive names like "Cats", "Florida 2010", "Air Show" etc.  In iTunes, I use the Photo pane to sync those folders with the iPad.  On the iPad, the photos are all organized by the above folder names and are easy to show.
    Using the folders works better for me than syncing with Aperture or iPhoto directly.  Using folders allows me to choose which photos I want to include, and doesn't risk any damage or deletion of photos in Aperture/iPhoto.
    I've also started using iCloud and Photostream.  It has many limitations, but is a good way to get photos on your iPad quickly (but not in any real organized fashion).

  • Managing videos in Aperture

    I've been importing videos from my PAS's and iPhone into Aperture. I'm looking for some feedback as to the benefits of allowing Aperture to manage those videos. It seems as though when I try to upload a video from Aperture to my MobileMe Gallery, the video doesn't work. I have to export it first and then upload the video via QuickTime in order to get it to work.
    Also, if videos don't support IPTC metadata, why are the fields eligible? Is it worth adding metadata to video files in Aperture?
    As as side question, if I were to continue managing video within Aperture, does it make sense in anyone's opinion to keep those videos in the same projects, etc as my image files? I have a smart album that holds just video, but it gets confusing (aside from the little video icon) when viewing images in the different views as to what is video and what is a photo.
    Thanks

    macorin wrote:
    I'm looking for some feedback as to the benefits of allowing Aperture to manage those videos.
    Aperture was not designed as, and does not excel as, a video storage, editing, and publishing workshop. My guess is that video was added in because it could be, not because users wanted it. My experience was that video tended to mung-up the works with 3.0. One of the upgrades has resolved those issues, but video remains nothing more than a limp tangent away from Aperture's core.
    As as side question, if I were to continue managing video within Aperture, does it make sense in anyone's opinion to keep those videos in the same projects, etc as my image files?
    Absolutely. Set one of each view's metadata overlays to show badges. Video has its own badge. Also, you might set the Poster Frame of each clip to show some text (the title, for instance) as a visual indication that the Preview is a video.

  • Blurry iPhone 4 Previews for managed photos

    There have been some previous posts on related blurry preview topics, but I have some very specific observations which may help, and I'm wondering if anyone
    a) has seen this before
    b) believes this should be filed as a bug report to Apple.
    c) has better suggestions.
    I'm using Aperture 3.1.2 currently (though most of the below was observed with 3.1.1) on an iMac i3, running 10.6.6.
    I have three cameras from which I import photos into Aperture: iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, and Canon 5D.
    - iPhone 3GS and Canon 5D: no matter whether I import directly into Aperture library (managed) or leave the photo somewhere else (referenced), the previews are sharp (when the original is sharp).
    - iPhone 4: when the JPEGs are managed, then they appear blurry. When they are imported as referenced, then they are fine and sharp. This is really obvious if I import the same photo directly into the library first, then copy the JPG somewhere else (say with a different filename), and import that photo again into the same project.... the blurry preview and sharp preview show up side by side.
    My import workflow for iPhone's, by the way, is to first use Image Capture to download them to a folder on the local HD, then import from directory using Aperture. The reason why I do this is because, unlike Aperture, Image Capture allows you to delete the original photos after import. For my 5D, I import directly from CF card using Aperture itself.
    I have tried the various suggestions posted on the forums for the blurry previews:
    o Regenerate Previews - this does nothing
    o Rebuild library - this doesn't change anything, and has the added disadvantage of adding a whole bunch of previously deleted folders (or that was in the Trash) into my library.
    o Delete Previews, restart Aperture - again nothing.
    I also tried to Relocate Masters for those iPhone 4 JPEGs that were imported directly into Aperture library (managed). This doesn't update the preview either.
    The only thing that seems to work is to relocate the masters, delete the versions, then to reimport the relocated masters back into Aperture as referenced. However, this deletes all of one's tags, edits, etc....
    Blurry previews are extremely frustrating, as it makes it really difficult to quickly triage through lots of photos. Later on, my wife may look at that photo in Browser mode and say, why did you tag that with four stars? Only by displaying in single photo or three-up view can one realize that it was a good sharp photo.
    I'm quite annoyed that Apple's own products won't integrate... I like Aperture overall too much to go back to Lightroom, but at the end of the day productivity is what matters.
    Thanks very much.

    So, I had to reboot my iMac since Aperture was hanging when opening the library. After the reboot, no matter if I try importing by drag and drop to the folder, or by checking and clicking on "Import Checked", the previews are now sharp from the iPhone 4 images.
    - In most projects, though, the previews that were not sharp before did not automatically become sharp.
    - What is weird is that in one particular project, the iPhone 4 previews did seem to become sharp, but my 5D shots in that project the previews became blurry.
    It's getting weirder and weirder, folks!

  • Full photos from Aperture to iphoto

    I'm new to aperture but I'm trying to import full quality photos from aprture to iphoto, however all I can manage to get in iphoto is thumbnails a few hundred kb worth...Does anyone know how to transfer full quality jpegs over after editing with aperture..ps I can't get raw files off my canon 450d either...
    cheers David

    Davo
    The only way to get "full photos" from Aperture to iPhoto is to export them from Aperture ant then import them to iPhoto.
    If you use the Media Browser in iPhoto (File -> Show Aperture Library) then you can drag Previews over. You can increase the quality if the pics available to iPhoto this way by increasing the quality of the Previews.
    Regards
    TD

  • New Apple application PHOTOS vs APERTURE

    Hello to everyone.
    With the coming of the new application PHOTOS (that is not a professional one) will APPLE continue to support APERTURE? (I mean with new updates and new releases for the next MAC OS systems)
    If not what is that best way to work?
    Change from APERTURE to PHOTOS (loosing all the professional features).
    Change from APERTURE to LIGHTROOM.
    Remain with the double management of PHOTOS and APERTURE (in this case there is a way to take inly a library?)
    Thank you in advance for your answer.
    Alan Ford

    Apple is simply making one piece of software that can run on multiple devices - and its geared toward take pictures with ipad or iphone and transfer through the cloud to your desk top sort of thing,   They are defining a platform that cuts out desktop only users.
    I use Photoshop - and am well aware that PHOTOS does not support PSD files (IPHOTO does or did if they dropped it after ILIFE09)
    Apparently many of the features of PHOTOS are in options that have to be added to menu bar.
    Biggest problem seems to be lack of easy to find instructions.  
    Below is some getting started pages.
    Send feedback to apple on why you don't like the app.
    photos getting started
    https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204655
    https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204410
    https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204264
    https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204414
    http://www.apple.com/feedback/

  • How do I change 'original' photos to 'referenced' photos in Aperture?

    New to Aperture, I mistakenly imported photos into Aperture believing they were 'referenced', and I applied a lot of metadata.
    Then I discovered they were 'original', not 'referenced'.
    Is there an easy way to switch them to 'referenced', and not lose my metadata?
    I need to keep the no. of photos on my laptop to a minimum, therefore I cannot store all my images in Aperture. (I probably should have gone with light room, since I hear it does this natively.)
    Thank you,
    Gina S

    When you import a digicam file into the Aperture Library, you tell Aperture where to store it.  If it is stored inside your Aperture Library package, it is referred to as "Managed".  If it is stored outside your Aperture Library package, it is referred to as "Referenced".  Aperture makes it easy to store your imported files on whichever directly-mounted storage device you want, and also easy to change the storage location at any time.
    Once they are imported, your digicam files are called "Originals" in Aperture-speak.  (In the manual, they also use the out-dated term "Master".)
    For a quick review of the parts of Aperture, look here.  I think you'll find it helpful.
    Metadata is Image-specific.  It remains with the Image, regardless of where you tell Aperture to store each Image's Original.
    Lastly, to save space on your system drive, you might consider, as an alternative to referencing some (or all) of your Originals to an external drive, moving your Library to an external drive and leaving all your Originals managed.  I have run Libraries off external drives for years.
    Aperture program: on system drive
    Your Library: either on system drive or on (fast) external drive
    Your Originals: either in your Library (managed) or elsewhere (referenced), almost always on external drive.

  • Data loss -- managed photos mis-badged as missing referenced photos

    I always import all photos as managed photos, and never use referenced photos. Yesterday, I noticed that the last 29 photos from a group of 96 photos imported Feb 18 were badged as "The referenced image’s master file has not been found."
    Indeed, although I had worked on many of these images in Aperture shortly after importing them, I could now only view a large but low-res thumbnail.
    Weirdly, when I right-click on one of these images and select "Manage Referenced Files..." I get a message that "The selection doesn't use any referenced files." I get the same message when I select "Manage Referenced Files..." from the File menu with the entire project selected.
    Using the Finder, as well as the find and locate commands in the terminal, I have verified that the missing images are not on my main or backup hard drives (unfortunately, I use a simple rsync script for backup, and I didn't discover this problem until after the deletions had propagated to my backup).
    The other 67 photos imported at the same time (same import group) seem fine, and, using the Finder, I can locate all of them in the Aperture library.
    To test one user error scenario, I imported some test photos into the Aperture library and then relocated the masters to the desktop. I then quit Aperture, deleted the photos on the desktop, and relaunched Aperture. As expected, the test photos had the same "The referenced image’s master file has not been found" badge, but when I right clicked and selected "Manage Referenced Files..." I got the expected dialog, unlike when I select the same option for the missing 29 photos.
    Any ideas what went wrong?
    G5 iMac   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

    Thanks for responding...
    It sounds pretty odd. First try to rebuild the
    database...as was suggested (Option>CMD on launch of
    Aperture).
    I will try this eventually. But I want to get some insight first, in case this could create more problems than it solves. I am also holding off on updating to 10.4.9 for the same reason.
    This might help. If not, try to make an
    adjustment on one of the images. This will force the
    thumbnail to redraw. If the adjustments aren't
    available for that particular image, then the image
    is really offline somewhere.
    I am unable to make any adjustments on these images.
    I assume you went into your Library "Show Package
    Contents" to confirm they are missing. If not, try
    that.
    Yes, the images are not in the folder with the other images from that import. Further, I used the unix 'find' and 'locate' commands to search my entire hard drive and backup drive, and the images were not found.
    Can you Export the image?
    That was how I first stumbled on this problem -- I tried to export and got an error message that "Versions with unavailable master images cannot be exported."
    The weird thing is that when I try and get the 'Managed referenced files...' dialog, Aperture claims that "The selection doesn't use any referenced files" -- that tells me this data loss might be the result of a bug and not user error.

  • Colored bands on photos in aperture canon 40d

    Does anyone else get bands and squares of pink to magenta color on some of their photos in aperture? It only involves portions of the photos and does not affect them all.
    I use a canon 40d and shoot RAW.
    I know that other color issues have been seen with other cameras and that this resolves when you roll back to the RAW update 2.1 but surely someone in Apple knows about this?
    Interestingly I have not experienced this yet on my Macbook Pro with the 2.4 update but it comes back each time in my imac.

    I am still having this same problem
    I have tried deleting both the preferences and presets. I have reinstalled Aperture and tried switching off automatic previews with no improvement. I have changed color sync profiles.
    I have noticed that the same thing happens in iphoto 9.
    I managed to speak to someone at Apple who was quite short with me and implied there was nothing much wrong. He told me to rebuild the database, then perform a consistency check and then hung up. I did both these things and still have the problem.
    I have invested a lot of time in Aperture as well as money on plugins and don't want to change but I may have to turn to Adobe if this can't be fixed

  • Photos in Aperture could not sync with iTunes

    I am using aperture 2 to manage all of my photo which is a great idea so far. I put my original into my external hard drive instead of into Aperture library. I am sure that all my photos refer to the right places because I can fine it when I click the function "show in my finder".
    However, in iTune, when I try to sync my photo from aperture from the way of selected folder, the folder doesn't have any photo inside.
    Thank you very much for your answer in advance.

    iTunes uses your previews to sync images.
    In Aperture, Choose Aperture >> Preferences then Click the Previews tab and make sure Share Previews with iLife and iWork is checked. You can also control the size of the previews in the Preferences.
    If you haven't set it up to automatically generate previews in Preferences, you will have to generate them manually: select all the photos in the Album you plan to sync, and choose Images>> Update Previews.
    DLS

  • Are there any apps for managing photos other than iphoto

    I do not find iphoto to be a particularly intuitive or user friendly app to manage photos with.  Are there any other options?

    What is your complaint about iPhoto? What are you having problems with?  Have you perused the tutorials on iPhoto:
    Apple - iPhoto for Mac
    Mac Apps - iPhoto - Apple Support
    What features do you want in a photo management applications.  There are many, many image management apps for Mac available:
    Lightroom
    Aperture
    IMatch 5
    Stock Keeper
    Photo Explorer
    Shoebox Express
    Shoebox Pro
    Picasa
    JetPhoto Studio
    myPhotos
    photo 1.5.1
    Photo Supreme
    MediaDex
    EzyPic Photo Organizer
    Daminion
    Photonator
    iMatch
    uAlbum
    All have different features so you'll need to determine what's important to you and do some research.  I don't think any are as easy to use as iPhoto, particularly with a Mac.

  • Importing 12,500 photos from Aperture.

    As the title says, I have 12,500 photo's in Aperture - broken down into folders and projects. For reasons that I dont need to expand on, I want to start using iphoto for managing my photos, but when I imported the pictures from aperture, I now have in iphot 1 event with 12,500 pictures!
    How do I get my folders from aperture to show as events in iphoto, and have the correct photos in these folders?
    TIA
    Wayno

    iPhoto has no knowledge of, and knows nothing of how the Aperture Library works. It cannot read the Aperture library. So:
    1. Export all your Masters
    2. Export all your Versions
    You can write the metadata to the files on export - check out the Export presets in Aperture. Note that you cannot export Faces. There is no convention for sharing Faces. The best you can do is use Faces as a basis for keywording.
    Import them into iPhoto. Note that there is no way to associate the masters with the versions in iPhoto, so you'll have apparent duplicates.
    There is no other way to get your Photos from Aperture to iPhoto. The best any other method can di is access either the thumbnails or the Previews.
    Regards
    TD

Maybe you are looking for