Manipulate sqlplus output from a UNION ALL

I have table tA with col a, table tB with col b. Could someone show me how to output the query result like:
a1
b1
a2
b2
a100
b100
not
a1
a2
a100
b1
b2
b100
Thanks.
- Zac

SQL> select * from tA;
                   A
                   1
                   2
                   3
                   4
                   5
                   6
                   7
                   8
                   9
                  10
10 rows selected.
SQL> select * from tB;
                   B
                   1
                   2
                   3
                   4
                   5
                   6
                   7
                   8
                   9
                  10
10 rows selected.
SQL> select 'a', a from tA
  2  union all
  3  select 'b', b from tB
  4  order by 2,1;
'                    A
a                    1
b                    1
a                    2
b                    2
a                    3
b                    3
a                    4
b                    4
a                    5
b                    5
a                    6
b                    6
a                    7
b                    7
a                    8
b                    8
a                    9
b                    9
a                   10
b                   10
20 rows selected.

Similar Messages

  • Cannot export query output when using UNION ALL

    Hi
    I can run a query in SQL Developer 1.5.5 and if it's a SELECT statement it works fine, but if I output the result of several SELECT statements using UNION ALL after some 10,000 records the SQL Developer crashes and it generates a file whose size is 0 kb
    Is there a workaround for this??
    Thanks and Regards!
    Isaac

    Should be fixed in the upcoming 2.1... you can try the RC1 also...
    Regards,
    K.

  • No output from Lirc at all since the kernel update

    I put this in a separate thread because I seem to have a different problem to the 'double press' issue and I'm pretty sure my remote isn't covered by mceusb. I've got a remote that until recently worked perfectly with the lirc_atiusb driver. However I get no output with irw or in boxee. I still get this in my dmesg output:
    lirc_atiusb: USB remote driver for LIRC $Revision: 1.88 $
    lirc_atiusb: Paul Miller <[email protected]>
    lirc_atiusb 3-1:1.0: lirc_dev: driver lirc_atiusb registered at minor = 0
    lirc_atiusb[2]: X10 WTI RF receiver on usb3:2
    usbcore: registered new interface driver lirc_atiusb
    Here is lircd.conf:
    # Please make this file available to others
    # by sending it to <[email protected]>
    # this config file was automatically generated
    # using lirc-0.8.2(default) on Sun Aug 12 02:13:30 2007
    # contributed by Ben Adler @ gmx dot net
    # brand: Medion / X10 (part of http://www.medion.de/md8824/)
    # remote control: RF Vista Remote Control (OR24V)
    # P/N: 2003 5335
    # devices being controlled by this remote: USB RF remote receiver (CM20E), P/N 2003 1776
    begin remote
    name Medion_X10
    bits 16
    eps 30
    aeps 100
    one 0 0
    zero 0 0
    pre_data_bits 8
    pre_data 0x14
    post_data_bits 16
    post_data 0x0
    gap 227978
    toggle_bit_mask 0x80800000
    begin codes
    red 0x87B2
    yellow 0x0934
    blue 0x8AB5
    green 0x0833
    power 0xD702
    text 0xEB16
    tvrecord 0x6D98
    disc 0xD904
    table 0x86B1
    tvplay 0xF11C
    back 0x75A0
    info 0x042F
    volume_up 0x5E89
    volume_down 0xDD08
    mute 0x5580
    channel_up 0xE00B
    channel_down 0x618C
    cursor_up 0xEF1A
    cursor_down 0x77A2
    cursor_left 0xF21D
    cursor_right 0x749F
    ok 0xF31E
    start 0x709B
    track_previous 0xF621
    track_next 0x78A3
    record 0xFC27
    pause 0x7EA9
    stop 0xFD28
    seek_backward 0x79A4
    play 0xFA25
    seek_forward 0x7BA6
    1 0xE20D
    2 0x638E
    3 0xE40F
    4 0x6590
    5 0xE611
    6 0x6792
    7 0xE813
    8 0x6994
    9 0xEA15
    0 0x6C97
    asterisk 0x0C37
    hash 0x8DB8
    clear 0x0530
    enter 0x8BB6
    end codes
    end remote
    And here is my current lsmod | grep lirc, although I've tried a bunch of different setups with and without the lirc package:
    lirc_atiusb 12179 0
    ir_lirc_codec 3135 0
    lirc_dev 7140 2 lirc_atiusb,ir_lirc_codec
    ir_core 12433 11 ir_lirc_codec,ir_sony_decoder,rc_hauppauge_new,ir_jvc_decoder,saa7134,budget_ci,ir_rc6_decoder,ir_rc5_decoder,ir_common,ir_nec_decoder
    usbcore 115802 5 lirc_atiusb,usbhid,ohci_hcd,ehci_hcd
    Thanks in advance, and sorry for the second thread.

    Perry3D wrote:
    Hi,
    i have the same problem with my X10 Remote.
    I wrote the lirc developers: http://old.nabble.com/lirc_atiusb-and-2 … 53763.html
    They recommend to use the ati_remote module. But for my remote control this modules doesn't work as i want.
    The current lirc_atiusb module is just a pre version. So i think this is an upstream bug.
    The current solution for me: i stay with 2.6.35 as long the bug is fixed.
    I'd have to roll back my graphics drivers amongst other things, and the new kernel fixed an issue with my network card I'll try the ati_remote module when I get home.
    Last edited by rocktorrentz (2010-11-29 13:12:32)

  • Output from selected string

    i have two table and i am giving the structures bellow
    tWO TABLE
    TBL1
    ID DATA                    COL1 COL2
    1     TESTING 1 DATA      2     DEPTID YEAR
    MESSGAE :TESTING DEPTID DATA 2008 ( 1 REPLACES COL1 VALUE AND 2 REPLACES COL2 VALUE
    TBL2
    ID     DEPTID     NAME
    1     IT     ALEX
    2     AC     GEORGE
    AFTER CALLING OUTPUT SHOULD BE FOR INPUT ID-1
    TESTING IT DATA 2008 . HOW I WILL GET THIS? THROUGH PROCEDURE OR FUNCTION

    (note: UPPERCASE is considered shouting)
    I get the feeling that you have only provided us with half of your actual requirement.
    Based on the little bit you've given us, this will achieve what you want...
    SQL> with tbl1 as (select 1 as id, 'TESTING 1 DATA 2' as data, 'DEPTID' as col1, 'YEAR' as col2 from dual)
      2      ,tbl2 as (select 1 as id, 'IT' as DEPTID, 'ALEX' as name from dual union all
      3                select 2, 'AC', 'GEORGE' from dual)
      4  --
      5  select replace(replace(data, '1', tbl2.deptid), '2', to_char(sysdate, 'YYYY')) as data
      6  from tbl1 join tbl2 on (tbl1.id = tbl2.id)
      7  /
    DATA
    TESTING IT DATA 2008
    SQL>I assume, however, that you are looking for something a little more dynamic in some way, but you need to tell us how.

  • Query using Union All and CTEs is slow

    TypePatient
    [ednum] int NOT NULL,  PK
    [BackgroundID] int NOT NULL, FK
    [Patient_No] varchar(50) NULL, FK
    [Last_Name] varchar(30) NULL,
    [First_Name] varchar(30) NULL,
    [ADateTime] datetime NULL,
    Treat
    [ID] int NOT NULL, PK
    [Ednum] numeric(10, 0) NOT NULL, FK
    [Doctor] char(50) NULL,
    [Dr_ID] numeric(10, 0) NULL,
    background
    [ID] int NOT NULL, PK
    [Patient_No] varchar(50) NULL, FK
    [Last_Name] char(30) NULL,
    [First_Name] char(30) NULL,
    [DateofBirth] datetime NULL,
    pdiagnose
    [ID] int NOT NULL, PK
    [Ednum] int NOT NULL, FK
    [DSMNo] char(10) NULL,
    [DSMNoIndex] char(5) NULL,
    substance
    [ID] int NOT NULL, PK
    [Ednum] int NOT NULL, FK
    [Substance] varchar(120) NULL,
    DXCAT
    [id] int NULL, PK
    [dx_description] char(100) NULL,
    [dx_code] char(10) NULL,
    [dx_category_description] char(100) NULL,
    [diagnosis_category_code] char(10) NULL)
    Substance
    ID
    Ednum
    Substance
    1
    100
    Alcohol Dependence
    4
    200
    Caffeine Dependence
    5
    210
    Cigarettes
    dxcat
    id
    dx_description
    dx_code
    dx_category_description
    diagnosis_category_code
    10
    Tipsy
    zzz
    Alcohol
    SA
    20
    Mellow
    ppp
    Mary Jane
    SA
    30
    Spacey
    fff
    LSD
    SA
    50
    Smoker
    ggg
    Nicotine
    SA
    pdiagnose
    ID
    Ednum
    DSMNo
    Diagnosis
    1
    100
    zzz
    Alcohol
    2
    100
    ddd
    Caffeine
    3
    210
    ggg
    Smoker
    4
    130
    ppp
    Mary Jane
    TypePatient
    ednum
    Patient_No
    Last_Name
    First_Name
    ADateTime
    100
    sssstttt
    Wolly
    Polly
    12/4/2013
    130
    rrrrqqqq
    Jolly
    Molly
    12/8/2013
    200
    bbbbcccc
    Wop
    Doo
    12/12/2013
    210
    vvvvwww
    Jazz
    Razz
    12/14/2013
    Treat
    ID
    Ednum
    Doctor
    Dr_ID
    2500
    100
    Welby, Marcus
    1000
    2550
    200
    Welby, Marcus
    1000
    3000
    210
    Welby, Marcus
    1000
    3050
    130
    Welby, Marcus
    1000
    background
    ID
    Patient_No
    Last_Name
    First_Name
    DateofBirth
    2
    sssstttt
    Wolly
    Polly
    8/6/1974
    3
    rrrrqqqq
    Jolly
    Molly
    3/10/1987
    5
    bbbbcccc
    Wop
    Doo
    8/12/1957
    6
    vvvvwww
    Jazz
    Razz
    7/16/1995
    Desired output:
    Staff ID
    Doctor
    Patient_No
    Client Name
    Date of Service
    Ednum
    DX Code
    DX Cat
    DX Desc
    Substance
    1000
    Welby, Marcus
    bbbcccc
    Wop, Doo
    12/12/2013
    200
    Caffeine Dependence
    1000
    Welby, Marcus
    rrrqqq
    Jolly, Molly
    12/8/2013
    130
    ppp
    SA
    Mary Jane
    1000
    Welby, Marcus
    sssttt
    Wolly, Polly
    12/4/2013
    100
    zzz
    SA
    Alcohol
    1000
    Welby, Marcus
    sssttt
    Wolly, Polly
    12/4/2013
    100
    ddd
    SA
    LSD
    1000
    Welby, Marcus
    sssttt
    Wolly, Polly
    12/4/2013
    100
    Alcohol Dependence
    1000
    Welby, Marcus
    vvvvwww
    Jazz, Razz
    12/14/2013
    210
    ggg
    SA
    Smoker
    1000
    Welby, Marcus
    vvvvwww
    Jazz, Razz
    12/14/2013
    210
    Cigarettes
    A patient is assigned an ednum. There are two different menus for staff to enter
    diagnoses. Each menu stores the entries in a different table. The two tables are substance and pdiagnose. A patient’s diagnosis for a substance abuse can be entered in one table and not the other. 
    The number of entries for different substances for each patient can vary between the two tables. John Doe might be entered for alcohol and caffeine abuse in the pdiagnosis table and entered only for caffeine abuse in the substance table. They are only
    linked by the ednum which has nothing to do with the diagnosis/substance. The substance entered in one table is not linked to the substance entered in the other. A query will not put an entry for alcohol from the pdiagnosis table on the same row as an alcohol
    entry from the substance table except by chance. That is the reason for the way the query is written.
    The query accepts parameters for a Dr ID and a start and end date. It takes about 7 to 15 seconds to run. Hard coding the dates cuts it down to about a second.
    I might be able to select directly from the union all query instead of having it separate. But then I’m not sure about the order by clauses using aliases.
    Is there a way to rewrite the query to speed it up?
    I did not design the tables or come up with the process of entering diagnoses. It can’t be changed at this time.
    Please let me know if you notice any inconsistencies between the DDLs, data, and output. I did a lot of editing.
    Thanks for any suggestions.
    with cte_dxcat (Dr_ID, Doctor, Patient_No,Last_Name,
    First_Name, Adatetime,Ednum,
    dx_code,diagnosis_category_code,dx_description,substance,
    DateofBirth) as
    (Select distinct t.Dr_ID, t.Doctor, TP.Patient_No,TP.Last_Name,
    TP.First_Name, TP.Adatetime as 'Date of Service',TP.Ednum,
    DXCAT.dx_code,DXCAT.diagnosis_category_code,DXCAT.dx_description,
    null as 'substance',BG.DateofBirth
    From TypePatient TP
    inner join treat t on TP.ednum = t.Ednum
    inner join background BG on BG.Patient_No = TP.Patient_No
    inner join pdiagnose PD on TP.Ednum = PD.Ednum
    inner join Live_Knowledge.dbo.VA_DX_CAT_MAPPING DXCAT on DXCAT.dx_code = PD.DSMNo
    Where (TP.Adatetime >= convert(varchar(10), :ST, 121)+ ' 00:00:00.000'
    and TP.Adatetime <= convert(varchar(10), :SP, 121)+ ' 23:59:59.000')
    and DXCAT.diagnosis_category_code = 'SA'
    and t.Dr_ID =:DBLookupComboBox2
    cte_substance (Dr_ID, Doctor, Patient_No,Last_Name,
    First_Name,Adatetime, Ednum,
    dx_code,diagnosis_category_code,dx_description,Substance,DateofBirth) as
    (Select distinct t.Dr_ID, t.Doctor, TP.Patient_No,TP.Last_Name,
    TP.First_Name, TP.Adatetime as 'Date of Service', TP.Ednum,
    null as 'dx_code',null as 'diagnosis_category_code',null as 'dx_description',s.Substance, BG.DateofBirth
    From TypePatient TP
    inner join treat t on TP.ednum = t.Ednum
    inner join background BG on BG.Patient_No = TP.Patient_No
    inner join pdiagnose PD on TP.Ednum = PD.Ednum
    inner join substance s on TP.Ednum = s.Ednum
    Where (TP.Adatetime >= convert(varchar(10), '12/1/2013', 121)+ ' 00:00:00.000'
    and TP.Adatetime <= convert(varchar(10), '12/31/2013', 121)+ ' 23:59:59.000')
    and t.Dr_ID =:DBLookupComboBox2
    cte_all (Dr_ID, Doctor, Patient_No,Last_Name,
    First_Name,Adatetime, Ednum,
    dx_code,diagnosis_category_code,dx_description,Substance,DateofBirth) as
    (select cte_dxcat.Dr_ID as 'Staff ID', cte_dxcat.Doctor as 'Doctor',
    cte_dxcat.Patient_No as 'Patient_No',
    cte_dxcat.Last_Name as 'Last',cte_dxcat.First_Name as 'First',
    cte_dxcat.Adatetime as 'Date of Service',cte_dxcat.Ednum as 'Ednum',
    cte_dxcat.dx_code as 'DX Code',cte_dxcat.diagnosis_category_code as 'DX Category Code',
    cte_dxcat.dx_description as 'DX Description',
    cte_dxcat.substance as 'Substance',cte_dxcat.DateofBirth as 'DOB'
    from cte_dxcat
    union all
    select cte_substance.Dr_ID as 'Staff ID', cte_substance.Doctor as 'Doctor',
    cte_substance.Patient_No as 'Patient_No',
    cte_substance.Last_Name as 'Last',cte_substance.First_Name as 'First',
    cte_substance.Adatetime as 'Date of Service',cte_substance.Ednum as 'Ednum',
    cte_substance.dx_code as 'DX Code',cte_substance.diagnosis_category_code as 'DX Category Code',
    cte_substance.dx_description as 'DX Description',
    cte_substance.substance as 'Substance',cte_substance.DateofBirth as 'DOB'
    from cte_substance)
    select cte_all.Dr_ID as 'Staff ID', cte_all.Doctor as 'Doctor',
    cte_all.Patient_No as 'Patient_No',
    (cte_all.Last_Name + ', '+ cte_all.First_Name) as 'Client Name',
    cte_all.Adatetime as 'Date of Service',cte_all.Ednum as 'Ednum',
    cte_all.dx_code as 'DX Code',cte_all.diagnosis_category_code as 'DX Category Code',
    cte_all.dx_description as 'DX Description',
    cte_all.substance as 'Substance',
    CONVERT(char(10), cte_all.DateofBirth,101) as 'DOB'
    from cte_all
    order by cte_all.Patient_No,cte_all.Adatetime

    Please post real DDL instead of your invented non-language, so that people do not have to guess what the keys, constraints, Declarative Referential Integrity, data types, etc. in your schema are. Learn how to follow ISO-11179 data element naming conventions
    and formatting rules. Your rude, non-SQL narrative is so far away from standards I cannot even use you as a bad example in book. 
    Temporal data should use ISO-8601 formats (we have to re-type the dialect you used!). Code should be in Standard SQL as much as possible and not local dialecT. 
    This is minimal polite behavior on SQL forums. You posted a total mess! Do you really have patients without names?? You really use a zero to fifty characters for a patient_nbr??? Give me an example. That is insane! 
    Your disaster has more NULLs than entire major corporate systems. Since you cannot change it, can you quit? I am serious. I have been employed in IT since 1965, and can see a meltdown.
    I looked at this and I am  not even going to try to help you; it is not worth it. I am sorry for you; you are in an environment where you cannot learn to do any right. 
    But you are still responsible for the rudeness of not posting DDL. 
    --CELKO-- Books in Celko Series for Morgan-Kaufmann Publishing: Analytics and OLAP in SQL / Data and Databases: Concepts in Practice Data / Measurements and Standards in SQL SQL for Smarties / SQL Programming Style / SQL Puzzles and Answers / Thinking
    in Sets / Trees and Hierarchies in SQL

  • Order by decode statement with Union all

    Hi
    I use Database Version: Oracle 9.2.0.1.0
    OCI version 9.2
    I try to use order by decode while i have a select base on union and I get en error:
    ORA-01785: ORDER BY item must be the number of a SELECT-list expression
    Here is my code:
    select catalog_type, catalog_id, item_id, item_name
    from items_catalog
    union all
    select catalog_type, catalog_id, organisation_unit_id, organisation_unit_name
    from units_catalog
    order by decode(catalog_type, 1, item_id, organisation_unit_id)
    If I use the decode on a select statement without union, it works.
    What I have to do in order to make it work on union all select?
    Tnx

    Hi,
    Here's a slightly different way:
    COLUMN     sort_key   NOPRINT
    VARIABLE     catalog_type_wanted     VARCHAR2 (5)
    EXEC         :catalog_type_wanted := '4'; 
    SELECT       catalog_id, item_id, item_name
    ,       CASE
               WHEN  :catalog_type_wanted = '1'  THEN  '1'
                                               ELSE  '2'
           END || item_id          AS sort_key
    FROM       items_catalog
          UNION ALL
    SELECT    catalog_id, organisation_unit_id, organisation_unit_name
    ,       CASE
               WHEN  :catalog_type_wanted = '1'  THEN  '2'
                                               ELSE  '1'
           END || organisation_unit_name     AS sort_key
    FROM       units_catalog
    ORDER BY  sort_key
    ;This way guarantees that (for example) 'SHOP50' comes before 'SHOP58', whether or not they are in the first half of the output or the second half.
    Notice that this uses the SQL*Plus COLUMN ... NOPRINT command to hide the sort_key column.
    If you're not using SQL*Plus, then whatever front end you are using may have a similar feature.
    If not, then you can do the UNION in a sub-query, as Daniel did, but do the ORDER BY in the main query (only).

  • Inconsistent SQL results when using View with UNION-ALL and table function

    Can any of you please execute the below scripts and check the output. In the table type variable, I am adding 4 distinct object ids, where as in the result, I get only the row pertaining to last id in the table type variable. Same row is returned 4 times (4= number of values in the table type).
    This scenario is occurring in our product with a SQL with exactly same pattern. I could simulate the same issue with the sample script I have provided.
    Database version: 11.2.0.3 Enterprise Edition, Single node
    Thank you.
    CREATE TABLE TEMP_T1 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
    CREATE TABLE TEMP_T2 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
    UPDATE TEMP_T2 SET OBJECT_ID = OBJECT_ID * 37;
    CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T1_U1 ON TEMP_T1(OBJECT_ID);
    CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T2_U1 ON TEMP_T2(OBJECT_ID);
    CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW TEMP_T1T2_V AS
    SELECT * FROM TEMP_T1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM TEMP_T2;
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TYPE AS OBJECT (OBJ_ID NUMBER);
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_OBJ_TYPE;
    SET SERVEROUTPUT ON;
    DECLARE
    TYPE TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_T1T2_V%ROWTYPE;
    TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE;
    TEMP_OBJ_TAB TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE := TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE();
    PROCEDURE ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(OBJ_ID IN NUMBER) IS
    BEGIN
    TEMP_OBJ_TAB.EXTEND;
    TEMP_OBJ_TAB(TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST) := TEMP_OBJ_TYPE(OBJ_ID);
    END;
    BEGIN
    ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(100);
    ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(116);
    ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(279);
    ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(364);
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('=====================');
    FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
    LOOP
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
    END LOOP;
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
    SELECT * BULK COLLECT INTO TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB
    FROM TEMP_T1T2_V VW
    WHERE ((VW.OBJECT_ID) IN (SELECT OBJ_ID
    FROM TABLE(CAST(TEMP_OBJ_TAB AS TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE))));
    FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
    LOOP
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
    END LOOP;
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
    IF TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.COUNT > 0 THEN
    FOR I IN TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.LAST
    LOOP
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_ID||' : '||TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_NAME);
    END LOOP;
    ELSE
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('NO ROWS RETURNED!');
    END IF;
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
    END;
    /

    I can reproduce it:
    SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.3.0 Production on Tue Oct 30 14:05:39 2012
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2011, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
    Enter user-name: scott
    Enter password:
    Connected to:
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
    SQL> select  *
      2    from  v$version
      3  /
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
    CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production
    TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
    SQL> CREATE TABLE TEMP_T1 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
    Table created.
    SQL>
    SQL> CREATE TABLE TEMP_T2 AS SELECT * FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
    Table created.
    SQL>
    SQL> UPDATE TEMP_T2 SET OBJECT_ID = OBJECT_ID * 37;
    72883 rows updated.
    SQL>
    SQL> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T1_U1 ON TEMP_T1(OBJECT_ID);
    Index created.
    SQL>
    SQL> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX TEMP_T2_U1 ON TEMP_T2(OBJECT_ID);
    Index created.
    SQL>
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW TEMP_T1T2_V AS
      2  SELECT * FROM TEMP_T1 UNION ALL SELECT * FROM TEMP_T2;
    View created.
    SQL>
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TYPE AS OBJECT (OBJ_ID NUMBER)
      2  /
    Type created.
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_OBJ_TYPE
      2  /
    Type created.
    SQL> SET SERVEROUTPUT ON;
    SQL>
    SQL> DECLARE
      2  TYPE TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE IS TABLE OF TEMP_T1T2_V%ROWTYPE;
      3  TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB_TYPE;
      4  TEMP_OBJ_TAB TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE := TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE();
      5  PROCEDURE ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(OBJ_ID IN NUMBER) IS
      6  BEGIN
      7  TEMP_OBJ_TAB.EXTEND;
      8  TEMP_OBJ_TAB(TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST) := TEMP_OBJ_TYPE(OBJ_ID);
      9  END;
    10  BEGIN
    11  ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(100);
    12  ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(116);
    13  ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(279);
    14  ADD_TO_TEMP_OBJ_TAB(364);
    15  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('=====================');
    16  FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
    17  LOOP
    18  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
    19  END LOOP;
    20  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
    21  SELECT * BULK COLLECT INTO TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB
    22  FROM TEMP_T1T2_V VW
    23  WHERE ((VW.OBJECT_ID) IN (SELECT OBJ_ID
    24  FROM TABLE(CAST(TEMP_OBJ_TAB AS TEMP_OBJ_TAB_TYPE))));
    25  FOR I IN TEMP_OBJ_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_OBJ_TAB.LAST
    26  LOOP
    27  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('OBJ_ID = '||TEMP_OBJ_TAB(I).OBJ_ID);
    28  END LOOP;
    29  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
    30  IF TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.COUNT > 0 THEN
    31  FOR I IN TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.FIRST..TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB.LAST
    32  LOOP
    33  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_ID||' : '||TEMP_T1T2_V_ROW_TAB(I).OBJECT_NAME);
    34  END LOOP;
    35  ELSE
    36  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('NO ROWS RETURNED!');
    37  END IF;
    38  DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('---------------------');
    39  END;
    40  /
    =====================
    OBJ_ID = 100
    OBJ_ID = 116
    OBJ_ID = 279
    OBJ_ID = 364
    OBJ_ID = 100
    OBJ_ID = 116
    OBJ_ID = 279
    OBJ_ID = 364
    364 : I_AUDIT
    364 : I_AUDIT
    364 : I_AUDIT
    364 : I_AUDIT
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> column object_name format a30
    SQL> select  object_id,
      2          object_name
      3    from  dba_objects
      4    where object_id in (100,116,279,364)
      5  /
    OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME
           100 ORA$BASE
           116 DUAL
           279 MAP_OBJECT
           364 I_AUDIT
    SQL>  Works fine in:
    =====================
    OBJ_ID = 100
    OBJ_ID = 116
    OBJ_ID = 279
    OBJ_ID = 364
    OBJ_ID = 100
    OBJ_ID = 116
    OBJ_ID = 279
    OBJ_ID = 364
    100 : ORA$BASE
    116 : DUAL
    364 : SYSTEM_PRIVILEGE_MAP
    279 : MAP_OBJECT
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> select  object_id,
      2          object_name
      3    from  dba_objects
      4    where object_id in (100,116,279,364)
      5  /
    OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME
          100 ORA$BASE
          116 DUAL
          364 SYSTEM_PRIVILEGE_MAP
          279 MAP_OBJECT
    SQL> select  *
      2    from  v$version
      3  /
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    CORE    11.2.0.1.0      Production
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    SQL>SY.
    Edited by: Solomon Yakobson on Oct 30, 2012 2:14 PM

  • Excluding slow table access in a UNION ALL view

    Hi,
    I have a view which unions three tables together.
    One component of the view requires a table scan, as 90% of the records are required.
    This view is then used in another outer select where these records are actually not required.
    So I tagged each component with a code and excluded that in the outer select. However it still appears to access the table.
    Is there any way I can exclude a component of the UNION ALL or do I need to explicitly split them?
    example:
    SELECT * FROM (
    SELECT 'A' Q, JANUARY F FROM ENORMOUS.TABLE WHERE KEY = 'Non Selective Key' UNION ALL
    SELECT 'B' Q, 1 F FROM DUAL UNION ALL
    SELECT 'C' Q, 1 F FROM DUAL
    ) A
    WHERE Q = 'B'
    When I run the query plan without the WHERE it performs the table scan
    When I include the WHERE it still performs the table scan but with a FILTER NULL IS NOT NULL afterwards.
    So it appears that it is doing the table scan regardless and then throwing the records away - is that correct?
    Any thoughts appreciated. I would prefer not the split this view out if possible as it is used everywhere.

    In summary my question is: is The Oracle query planner smart enough to exclude a component from a load of stacked UNION ALL queries?
    given this query:
    CREATE VIEW TEST AS
    SELECT Q, F
    FROM
    SELECT 'A' Q, JANUARY F FROM ENORMOUS.TABLE WHERE KEY = 'Non Selective Key' UNION ALL
    SELECT 'B' Q, 1 F FROM DUAL UNION ALL
    SELECT 'C' Q, 1 F FROM DUAL
    ) A;
    -- 1. This one selects from all tables, including a table scan on the enormous table
    SELECT * FROM TEST;
    -- 2. This one selects from all tables, including a table scan on the enormous table
    -- However the query plan has a FILTER after the table scan. Does it exclude this work?
    SELECT * FROM TEST WHERE Q = 'B';When I run the query plan without the WHERE it performs the table scan
    When I include the WHERE the query plan indicates it's doing the table scan but with a FILTER NULL IS NOT NULL afterwards.
    So it appears that it is doing the table scan regardless and then throwing the records away - is that correct?
    Any thoughts appreciated. I would prefer not the split this view out if possible as it is used everywhere.
    Oracle version:
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
    CORE     11.2.0.2.0     Production
    TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
    Plan output for 1:
    SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=ALL_ROWS (Cost=7166 Card=2 M Bytes=41 M)
    1 VIEW (Cost=7166 Card=2 M Bytes=41 M)
    2 1 UNION-ALL
    3 2 TABLE ACCESS FULL PLANNING.BF_GEN_STATS_TRAN (Cost=7162 Card=2 M Bytes=72 M)
    4 2 FAST DUAL (Cost=2 Card=1)
    5 2 FAST DUAL (Cost=2 Card=1)
    Plan output for 2:
    SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=ALL_ROWS (Cost=2 Card=3 Bytes=48)
    1 VIEW (Cost=2 Card=3 Bytes=48)
    2 1 UNION-ALL
    3 2 FILTER
    4 3 TABLE ACCESS FULL PLANNING.BF_GEN_STATS_TRAN (Cost=7162 Card=2 M Bytes=72 M)
    5 2 FAST DUAL (Cost=2 Card=1)
    6 2 FILTER
    7 6 FAST DUAL (Cost=2 Card=1)

  • Select extra row without using UNION ALL in pl/sql

    Hi,
    Can anyone tell me how to select extra row without using UNION or UNION ALL in pl/sql. Actually I want to have my o/p of query as partitioned by designation and ordered by salary and than one extra row which will contain the highest salary in a particular salary. My table has first_name,emp_id,designation and salary column. And I wnt the o/p as.
    Mohinish,12212,SI,46000
    Ram,11212,SSI,47000
    Shyam,12133,SI,48000
    Rick,9898,SI,46000
    Rocky,12312,SSI,56000
    Sariq,23948,SI,43000
    Suman,12789,HR,49000
    Sampy,12780,SI,46000
    Parna,11111,HR,50000
    Now the o/p should be.
    Mohinish,12212,SI,46000
    Rick,9898,SI,46000
    Sariq,23948,SI,43000
    Shyam,12133,SI,48000
    Shyam,12133,SI,48000
    Ram,11212,SSI,47000
    Rocky,12312,SSI,56000
    Rocky,12312,SSI,56000
    Suman,12789,HR,49000
    Parna,11111,HR,50000
    Parna,11111,HR,50000
    Thanks in Advance

    You don't have to do a UNION or UNION ALL in PL/SQL but you would need to in SQL to get the desired output:
    with data_recs
    as (select 'Mohinish' first_name,12212 emp_id,'SI' designation,46000 salary from dual union
         select 'Ram',11212,'SSI',47000 from dual union
         select 'Shyam',12133,'SI',48000 from dual union
         select 'Rick',9898,'SI',46000 from dual union
         select 'Rocky',12312,'SSI',56000 from dual union
         select 'Sariq',23948,'SI',43000 from dual union
         select 'Suman',12789,'HR',49000 from dual union
         select 'Sampy',12780,'SI',46000 from dual union
         select 'Parna',11111,'HR',50000 from dual)
    select first_name, emp_id, designation, salary from data_recs union all
    select s.first_name, s.emp_id, s.designation, s.salary
      from (select first_name,
                   emp_id,
                   designation,
                   salary,
                   row_number() over (partition by designation order by salary desc) high_salary
              from data_recs
             order by designation, salary) s
    where s.high_salary = 1
    order by designation, salary;
    FIRST_NAME  EMP_ID DESIGNATION   SALARY
    Suman        12789 HR             49000
    Parna        11111 HR             50000
    Parna        11111 HR             50000
    Sariq        23948 SI             43000
    Rick          9898 SI             46000
    Mohinish     12212 SI             46000
    Sampy        12780 SI             46000
    Shyam        12133 SI             48000
    Shyam        12133 SI             48000
    Ram          11212 SSI            47000
    Rocky        12312 SSI            56000
    Rocky        12312 SSI            56000

  • Updatable Materialized View with Union ALL

    (please don't ask about db structure)
    DB: 11gR2
    create table table_1  (
        id number primary key,
        val varchar2(100)
    create table table_2  (
        id number primary key,
        val varchar2(100)
    insert into table_1(id) values (0);
    insert into table_1(id) values (2);
    insert into table_1(id) values (3);
    insert into table_1(id) values (4);
    insert into table_1(id) values (5);
    insert into table_2(id) values (10);
    insert into table_2(id) values (12);
    insert into table_2(id) values (13);
    insert into table_2(id) values (14);
    insert into table_2(id) values (15);
    update table_1 set val='Table1 val:'||id;
    update table_2 set val='Table2 val:'||id;
    create view v_table_all as
    select * from table_1
    view V_TABLE_ALL created.
    select * from v_table_all;
    ID                     VAL                                                                                                 
    0                      Table1 val:0                                                                                        
    2                      Table1 val:2                                                                                        
    3                      Table1 val:3                                                                                        
    4                      Table1 val:4                                                                                        
    5                      Table1 val:5                                                                                        
    select column_name, updatable, insertable, deletable
    from user_updatable_columns
    where table_name = 'V_TABLE_ALL'
    COLUMN_NAME                    UPDATABLE INSERTABLE DELETABLE
    ID                             YES       YES        YES      
    VAL                            YES       YES        YES      
    update v_table_all set val='XXX changed' where id = 3;
    1 row updated.
    select * from table_1;
    ID                     VAL                                                                                                 
    0                      Table1 val:0                                                                                        
    2                      Table1 val:2                                                                                        
    3                      XXX changed                                                                                         
    4                      Table1 val:4                                                                                        
    5                      Table1 val:5                                                                                        
    rollback;
    select * from table_1;
    ID                     VAL                                                                                                 
    0                      Table1 val:0                                                                                        
    2                      Table1 val:2                                                                                        
    3                      Table1 val:3                                                                                        
    4                      Table1 val:4                                                                                        
    5                      Table1 val:5                                                                                        
    create or replace view v_table_all as
    select * from table_1
    union select * from table_2;
    view V_TABLE_ALL created.
    select * from v_table_all;
    ID                     VAL                                                                                                 
    0                      Table1 val:0                                                                                        
    2                      Table1 val:2                                                                                        
    3                      Table1 val:3                                                                                        
    4                      Table1 val:4                                                                                        
    5                      Table1 val:5                                                                                        
    10                     Table2 val:10                                                                                       
    12                     Table2 val:12                                                                                       
    13                     Table2 val:13                                                                                       
    14                     Table2 val:14                                                                                       
    15                     Table2 val:15  
    select column_name, updatable, insertable, deletable
    from user_updatable_columns
    where table_name = 'V_TABLE_ALL'
    COLUMN_NAME                    UPDATABLE INSERTABLE DELETABLE
    ID                             NO        NO         NO       
    VAL                            NO        NO         NO       
    trying update:
    update v_table_all set val='XXX changed' where id = 3;
    SQL-Fehler: ORA-01732: Datenmanipulationsoperation auf dieser View nicht zulässig
    01732. 00000 -  "data manipulation operation not legal on this view"
    *Cause:   
    *Action:
    drop view v_table_all;
    view V_TABLE_ALL dropped.all is ok before this point.
    now we want create a new materialized view with some query
    create  materialized view v_table_all
    as
    select * from table_1
    union all select * from table_2 ;
    materialized view V_TABLE_ALL created.
    select column_name, updatable, insertable, deletable
    from user_updatable_columns
    where table_name = 'V_TABLE_ALL'
    COLUMN_NAME                    UPDATABLE INSERTABLE DELETABLE
    ID                             YES       YES        YES      
    VAL                            YES       YES        YES       it seems to be ok with update.
    but...
    update v_table_all set val='XXX changed' where id = 3;
    SQL-Fehler: ORA-01732: Datenmanipulationsoperation auf dieser View nicht zulässig
    01732. 00000 -  "data manipulation operation not legal on this view"
    *Cause:   
    *Action:How can solve this issue??
    Any suggestion

    Looks like user_updatable_columns sort of thinks the MV is just a table - I don't know about that...
    An MV on a single table can be updated - I tried that and it works:
    create materialized view mv_table_1 for update
    as
    select * from table_1;I noticed [url http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e16579/advmv.htm#sthref294]examples stating the UNION ALL needs a "marker" so Oracle can know from the data which source table a row in the MV originates from - like this:
    create materialized view v_table_all for update
    as
    select 'T1' tab_id, table_1.* from table_1
    union all
    select 'T2' tab_id, table_2.* from table_2 ;But that also fails (the "marker" requirement was specifically for FAST REFRESH, so it was just a long shot ;-) )
    What are you planning to do?
    <li>Create the MV.
    <li>Update records in the MV - which then is no longer consistent with the source data.
    <li>Schedule a complete refresh once in a while - thereby overwriting/losing the updates in the MV.
    If that is the case, I suggest using a true table rather than an MV.
    <li>Create table t_table_all as select ... .
    <li>Update records in the table - which then is no longer consistent with the source data.
    <li>Schedule a job to delete table and insert into table select ... once in a while - thereby overwriting/losing the updates in the table.
    In other words a kind of "do it yourself MV".
    I cannot see another way at the moment? But perhaps try in the data warehousing forum - the people there may have greater experience with MV's ;-)

  • Issue with union all in sql

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement as below.
    SELECT 'A' AS 'XXX' FROM DUAL
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 'B' AS 'XXX' FROM DUAL
    I need to check in such a way in my second sql query if 'B'='A' then i need to print 'A' else 'B' , means in my second query i need to compare the value of XXX with the first query value of XXX if it is same then i need to print first query's value of XXX or else need to print second queries XXX value.
    Please help me on this

    user13424229 wrote:
    Hi All,
    I have a requirement as below.
    SELECT 'A' AS 'XXX' FROM DUAL
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 'B' AS 'XXX' FROM DUAL
    I need to check in such a way in my second sql query if 'B'='A' then i need to print 'A' else 'B' , means in my second query i need to compare the value of XXX with the first query value of XXX if it is same then i need to print first query's value of XXX or else need to print second queries XXX value.
    Please help me on thisYour quesiton is not very clear, I would suggest you read {message:id=9360002}.
    If you are looking at a way to see the next or previous row from your current row then you can use LEAD or LAG analytical function. They are well documented. You can read all about it there.

  • Union All vs. View Creation Problem

    Here is my problem basicly;
    I have three table.
    select * from table1;
    select * from table2;
    select * from table3;
    I need to create one view by combining those tables with 'union all' word.
    create or replace view view1 as
    select * from table1;
    union all
    select * from table2;
    union all
    select * from table3;
    Then, I want to write a query as;
    select * from view1 where column1 = x;
    When I did this, view1 first combines all the rows of the tables, then searches x value in all the data. That's OK. However I want to first search x value in the tables, and combine the results of each table and get the result rows.
    I mean, my query "select * from view1 where column1 = x;" need to act as
    select * from table1;
    column1 = x
    union all
    select * from table2;
    column1 = x
    union all
    select * from table3;
    column1 = x
    How can I do this?
    Thanks everyone..

    SnigRO
    I think what you mean is that your query is sequentially full scanning all three tables, and you would like instead for it to use index scans.
    Show the plan for the query. The predicate can be pushed down, but whether it makes any difference may depend:
    - statistics on each table (full scan may be faster than index scan)
    - are the various column1 columns indexed
    - certain documented or hidden optimiser parameters can encourage or discourage push down: eg optimizercost_based_transformation
    - Oracle version: there have been known bugs that interfere with push down (eg Bug 3723007 - Predicate push down may not occur in 10g - reported in 10.1)
    HTH
    Regards Nigel

  • Creating M.V on time with union all

    Hi,
    Here i am creating a M.V and i want refresh this on time(example every day 12.00)
    create materialized view log on emp
    with primary key
    including new values;
    create materialized view log on dept
    with primary key
    including new values;
    create materialized view  emp_dept_new
    refresh on (what ever)
    as select deptno from emp
    union all
    select deptno from dept;when i am executing the last script i am getting some error.
    Please help me in this issue very argent .............
    Thanks
    SKPR.

    SKPR wrote:
    Hi,
    Here i am creating a M.V and i want refresh this on time(example every day 12.00)
    create materialized view log on emp
    with primary key
    including new values;
    create materialized view log on dept
    with primary key
    including new values;
    create materialized view  emp_dept_new
    refresh on (what ever)
    as select deptno from emp
    union all
    select deptno from dept;when i am executing the last script i am getting some error.You will do as "(what ever)" isn't valid syntax.
    Please help me in this issue very argent .............Not for us it's not.
    If you expect help, post your actual code and post the error message you're getting. We're not mind readers, so "some error" means nothing to us.

  • Improve performance with union all

    Hello there,
    Oracle Database 11g Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
    SQL> show parameter optimizer
    ORA-00942: Tabel of view bestaat niet. (Does not exist)I have the following query using the following input variables
    - id
    - startdate
    - enddate
    The query has the following format
    - assume that the number of columns are the same
    - t1 != t3 and t2 != t4
    select ct.*
    from
      select t1.*
      from   tabel1 t1
        join tabel2 t2
          on t2.key = t1.key
      union all
      select t3.*
      from   tabel3 t3
        join tabel4 t4
          on t4.key = t3.key
    where ct.id = :id
      and ct.date >= :startdate
      and ct.date < :enddate
    order by ct.dateIt is performing really slow, after the first read it performs fast.
    I tried the following thing, which was actually even slower!
    with t1c as
    select t1.*
      from   tabel1 t1
        join tabel2 t2
          on t2.key = t1.key
    where t1.id = :id
      and t1.date >= :startdate
      and t1.date < :enddate
    t2c as
    select t3.*
      from   tabel3 t3
        join tabel4 t4
          on t4.key = t3.key
    where t3.id = :id
      and t3.date >= :startdate
      and t3.date < :enddate
    select ct.*
    from
      select *
      from   t1c
      union all
      select *
      from   t2c
    order by ct.dateSo in words, I have an 'union all' construction reading from different tables with matching columns 'id' and 'date'.
    How can I improve this? Can it be improved? If you do not know the answer, but maybe a suggestion, I will be happy aswell!!!
    Thanks in advance!
    Kind regards,
    Metroickha

    >
    So in words, I have an 'union all' construction reading from different tables with matching columns 'id' and 'date'.
    How can I improve this? Can it be improved? If you do not know the answer, but maybe a suggestion, I will be happy aswell!!!
    >
    If you want to improve on what Oracle is doing you first need to know 'what Oracle is doing'.
    Post the execution plans for the query that show what Oracle is doing.
    Also post the DDL for the tables and indexes and the record counts for the tables and ID/DATE predicates.

  • Different results using View with union all in 11R1 compared to 10R2

    Hello,
    I have the following situation:
    In Oracle 10R2 I defined a view which looks like this
    create view test_view
    as
    select 'field1;field2;field3' field from dual
    union all
    select field
    from (
    select tfield1||';'||tfield2||';'||tfield3 field
    from table1
    order by tfield1,tfield2,tfield3
    The idea is, my first line contains a header information an then the data in the required sorting order.
    So, in 10R2, when I export the view with select field from test_view, I get the result as expected, which means, the header from the part with the dual was in the first line and after that, the data in the required sort order.
    Now, in 11.1.0.7, it is completely different, because the row of the dual is somewhere in my result set. But if I send the sql instead of the view, I get the expected result as in 10R2.
    I have no idea why this is the case now, because in 10R2 this was working permanently as expected. When I look at the execution plan, I see, that he starts parallelisation, which is ok, but the difference is, that in this parallelisation the select from dual is included and in 10R2 he first make the line from the dual and then the parallelisation with the data. It's not clear to me, that if I send the sql to the database I see the required result, but if i define the view as mentioned, and start a select field from view, I get now get the different sorting, because of the parallelisation, where the optimizer he changes his behavior comparing the both database versions. So my question ist, how can I change this behavior to get the same behavior as in release 10R2.
    Best regards
    Rainer

    Hello,
    thank you for your sample, I see your idea for my sorting purpose.
    I want to look at the following point:
    I create the table, as you described. The table has the degree and instances 1. Now I deefine the following view:
    create view view_test
    as
    select 'field1;field2;field3' field
    from dual
    union all
    select tfield1 || ';' || tfield2 || ';' || tfield3 field
    from (select * from table1 order by tfield1,tfield2).
    This is the way I used it in 10 R2.
    Now, the SQL select field from view_test delivers the expected result:
    field1;field2;field3
    a;b;c
    d;e;f
    So far so good. But now, I changed the degree of the table1 (alter table table1 parallel (degree 4 instances 1);).
    The result looks like that:
    a;b;c
    field1;field2;field3
    d;e;f
    So, the parallelisation of my object seems to be the reason for the, in my eyes, "wrong" sort order. In 10R2 I used this degree and instance values for my table and defined a view and it was working fine. Now, after our migration, I had this "trouble". For me it seems, that the optimizer made some changes, or mabe this is a bug, who knows ?
    I also tried, to change the nls_comp, and set the undocumented parameters as described in the Metalink note 7497640.8, but with no effect of my result set.
    Best regards
    Rainer

Maybe you are looking for

  • Automatic generation of PO in

    Dear all, we have to cover the following scenario: an order is sold to a customer belonging to a Sales Area from a plant that doesn't belong to the company of the sales area  of the order. In this case the standard support the creation of the interco

  • How does Airplay transfer audio file format to an Airport Express?

    Hi, everyone How does Airplay transfer audio file format to an Airport Express? Many from the Internet claim that iTunes encodes an AIFF file format into an Apple Lossless Audio Codec (ALAC) file format before sending signal to an Airport Express. Is

  • Question related to deletion of archived files.

    Hi everyone, I have used the archiving object 'idoc' to archive data. However, this attempt to archive(write) failed twice and now i have two invalid sessions 632 and 633. It has created archvied files worth 80 GB in my UNIX system, which are useless

  • WITH EXAMPLE

    Hi friends, need any good example for doing..<b>.I am listing down the example i finished . now you would be able to help me after seeing what am I doing...</b> Please help...will reward for helping SCENARIO—GET INVOICE DETAILS: Import the Bapi “BAPI

  • SRW.SET_MAXROW

    Hello, In Reports 6i, I have used SRW.SET_MAXROW in the Before Report Trigger to dynamically limit the number of records fetched from the database as per an user specified parameter value. Say if the query in the data model fetches 25 records, but th