Manual postings to reconcialiation accounts

Hi All
We are doing data loading and we want to post balance to Vendor , customer and asset reconcilaition accounts manually by changing the GL master data for some time and reverting back to its orginal state after we are done. Can anyone explain the  impacts of doing this?.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
At the outset there is no necessity for direct posting into reconciliation accounts. The system does it on its own. In addition NO direct postings can be made into reconcilitaion accounts.
The very nature of reconciliation accounts is to have transaction integrity between the customer/vendor/asset sub ledgers. The individual open items in the sub ledgers roll up to reconciliation account.  By uploading data the purpose of having such a functionality is lost. There is a huge risk of sub ledgers balances not synchronising with the reconciliation accounts.
It is fraught with risks. And strongly recommended not to be done.
Muralitk

Similar Messages

  • Block Postings to specific account/profit center combinations

    How do I set rules or controls to prohibit manual postings to specific account/profit center combinations?  I want to emphasize that I am not not just interested in blocking postings to an account, it has to be the unique combination of account and profit center which is prohibited.
    Thank you,
    Mark Galla

    Hi,
    Use OB28...
    Set the prerequisite as BKPF-Tcode : FB01...( any transaction used for manual posting)
    and BSEG-BUKRS <> the company code
    Then in the Check button
    BSEG-PRCTR = prctr ( first create a set id using GS01 with this name there give all the profit center which you want to block.
    Third is as usual give the message type as Error.
    Thats it...
    Hope this helps
    Regards,
    Velumani

  • List of GL accounts that are Open for manual postings

    Hi,
    I am trying to download a list of all the GL accounts that are open for manual postings.  Meaning in FS00 the check box "Post Automatically Only" is not ticked.  Also I would like the list to include the Field status group associated with the GL account.  Does anyone know how i can find this?  I looked through the tables SKA1, SKAT and did not find it there.  When I get the technical information for the account, it says Structure "GLACCOUNT_SCREEN_CCODE" and field "XINTB."  Any ideas?
    Thanks,
    Rashad

    Hi,
    Post automatically only and FSG are company code specific. so you should be checking that in relevant table SKB1 which has companycode specific details.
    Regards
    Shivappriya

  • Manual posting to reconciliation account under asset account group

    We need to maintain Asset Group (G007) to allow manual input in order to post a period end-closing adjustment as required by our external auditors. ( i.e in the reconciliation account under the asset account group, we need to check the 'allow manual input' option so as to do posting to this account manually).
    Under normal circumstances, the posting should have been from WBS Element, to AUC, then to Fixed Assets.  However, since all the procedures have been completed until Depreciation Run, we have no option but to input this manually.
    Similar Recon accounts which allow manual inputs are Accounts Receivable (GL Code 115000) and Accounts Payable (GL 210000). 
    My intention is to have this captured in the system as of Dec. 31, 2008; Reversed the same transaction on 01-Jan-09 and process it normally as mentioned above.
    Valuable assistance will be highly appreciated.
    Best regards,

    You can make manual postings on the asset reconciliation account with the transaction ABF1
    Use PK 70 or 75 , G/L account and transaction type 100.
    The result is that asset accounting is no longer in line with your G/L accounts.
    Put this transaction in your authorization make the posting and reverse and take the transaction out off the authorization!

  • Blocking Manual Postings in FI

    Hi All,
    I would like to know "which are all the Accounts blocked for Manual Postings in FI?". There should be some Master table in which a flag is set or reset for this. Please let me know if you have more details.
    With Best Regds,
    Prabahar N.R

    Dear Prabahar N.R,
                     Field name is XINTB. If you set this field in the Account Msster then It indicates that this account can only be posted to by the system using account determination tables.
    Regards,
    Vikas Madaan

  • Manual postings in COPA

    Hi,
    The manual postings done through the tcode KB11n, are not updated to BI cubes through COPA datasources.
    Is there any way to update the manual postings to BI.
    Thanks in advance!,
    Jyothi.

    HI,
    What business scenario you have which necessiates this process?
    You see the logic for not making available 'Value fields' for editing while making a FI entry..Keeps CO-PA out of balance when you try to reconcile with FI.
    However, there is an option, if it is must...Using CO-PA enhancement 'COPA0005' to transfer a different value than entered in FI.
    Please post back with your scenario.
    Hope this helps.

  • Block Manual JE  for particular accounts

    Hi all,
    I need an SP where i can block any manual JE if the inventry accounts are selected. This is the query that i have but it returns errors;
    IF @transaction_type = 'A' AND @object_type = '30' 
    BEGIN
    if exists(Select '141010','141020' from [dbo].[JDT1] T0
    Where T0.BaseEntry IS NULL
       AND T0.DocEntry=@list_of_cols_val_tab_del)
    begin
         SELECT @error = 1, @error_message = 'Manual JE for these accounts not permitted  !'
    end
    END
    Please assist.
    Thanks,
    Joseph

    Dear,
    Try this:
    IF @transaction_type = 'A','U' AND @object_type = '30'
    BEGIN
    if exists(Select T0.Transid from dbo.JDT1 T0
    Where (T0.Account = '141010' or T0.Account=' 141020' )
    AND T0.Transid=@list_of_cols_val_tab_del)
    BEGIN
    SELECT @error = 1, @error_message = 'Manual JE for not permitted '
    END
    END
    Hope this will solve your problem.
    regards,
    Neetu

  • Deactivate manual PR creation with account assignment "N"

    Hi experts,
    How to Deactivate the manual PR creation with account assignment "N" in ME51N ,as these PR with account assignment "N" is to be made from CJ20N Tcode.
    Kindly help..
    Thanks

    Hi,
    The above proposed solution is not working.Kindly let me know if can be done through any development.If so,please tell me the USER EXIT for this requirement..
    There is no way through configuration changes to block the manual creation of PR for account assignment "N"
    Thanks
    Edited by: ARITRA MUKHERJEE on Sep 4, 2010 10:13 AM

  • Reconciliation: Manually link not matched accounts to OIM users

    Hi all,
    Is it possible to manually link a reconciled account to a OIM user?
    When reconciliation process is finished, in the reconciliation manager there are a few accounts that are not matched (to OIM users). This is beacuse they are "service accounts" or resource "administrative accounts", and the user ID of the reconciled account is not equal to any existing OIM user (xellerate users).
    In that case, we want to manually link those accounts to an administrator (OIM users). So, when listing the resource profile of that user, those accounts are showed as provisioned.
    By now, we are trying to achieve that, only that, not any service account behaviour (that will be the next goal).
    Regards.
    Edited by: user643044 on Feb 3, 2009 9:12 AM

    Thank you.
    We have solved it in the following way:
    1.- RO: create a "dummy" recon field.
    2.- Recon Connector (java code): create a field (uid_to_map), but not added to the hashmap. So, this field is added to the reconciliation event as "unprocessed".
    3.- Create a Recon Rule, to map OIM "User Id" -> RO "dummy"
    4.- Perform reconciliation.
    5.- Edit the reconciliation event. Edit the unprocessed field "uid_to_map", linking it with "dummy" recon field, and introducing the OIM user ID of the OIM user we want to link to.
    6.- Re-apply the matching rule.
    So, the account is linked to the user.
    Maybe it could help somebody who needs the same functionality.

  • Manual JE using control accounts

    Hi all
    Is it possible to pass manual JE using control accounts..?
    rgs anand

    Hi Anand,
    If the control account is associated to a Business Partner, you have to enter the BP Code on the JE (press CTRL+TAB).
    If the Business Partner is associated to more than one control accounts, then you can display the Control Account column on JE and select the required control account.
    Hope it helps.
    Cheers,
    Marini

  • Alternative reconcialiation account for the Customer

    Dear all,
    In our system, One sales order type has its own billing type (Ex: Sales Order type ZOR1-relevant billing type is ZF1). When we define Customer Master (Tcode : XD01,XD02) , the G/L reconcialiation account is chosen in the company code data. My problem is in about reconcialiation account for customer (Ex: in Company Code of the customer, I have chosen recon.account 1311000). During billing process, I want to change recon.account from 1311000 into 1311200 in the accounting document of this billing. How can I do this change?
    Thanks in advance! Specially, help me how to config it in detail

    hi
    this is to inform you that
    G/L reconcialiation account is used as subledger account for normal posting.
    let me understand why you want this requriment.
    balajia

  • Exclude postings from certains accounts from Project Settlement

    Hi,
    I would like to know if there is a certain config that could exclude postings of CERTAIN ACCOUNTS from Project settlement.
    Thanks!
    Vivian

    Hi,
    May I know if you are referring to OKO6 config? We have no included any of those unwanted cost elements for settlement, but during settlement we are getting error saying that allocation structure not complete - so we need to find a way for system to totally exclude posting from those accounts for settlement (instead of showing error)
    Thanks!
    Vivian

  • Manual postings to PCA for previous periods seems to get posted twice

    Dear All,
    Actual postings to PCA are performed manually using a custom job from SA38. Postings were made in FI for all previous (closed) periods . After running those jobs for previous periods to transfer those entries, some companies and accounts are showing duplicate amounts or just a balance on comparison ledger and not in base ledger. How to correct this.
    Thanks a lot for your help

    Hi
    You will have to use 9KE0 or a custom job again to rectify this
    Ajay M

  • Manually Clearing GR/IR account

    Dear all,
    Is there any way to manaully clear the GR/IR account only?
    if so, please advise on the T/code.
    Regards

    HI,
    MR11 is designed to show the GRs that have not yet been fully invoiced and the
    invoices that have not yet been fully received.
    In any normal business situation there will always be some invoices for items
    that have not yet been received and some receipts that have not yet been
    invoiced. But MR11 is designed to be used to clear the OLD ones that are
    probably NEVER going to be completed.
    So you would run MR11 with a date in the past (a few months old normally) and
    anything that has still got a balance (either way) could indicate that you will
    never get these cleared no matter how long you wait.
    So you can use this transaction to clear these documents.
    The best way to use it is to run it firstly with very small tolerances (value
    and value percentage) and very old dates. For example any PO older than 6 months
    that has a balance of less than 10 USD. You would prepare the list intially
    (without update) and see the proposed effect. If you were happy with this you
    can then run it in update mode and clear those documents. This will post any
    outstanding values correctly and close down the PO.
    For example if you had a PO where you had received 99 and the invoice was for
    100, the system would increase the stock value of those 99 by 1 to reflect that
    we paid 100 for those 99 items (and close the PO)
    Similarly if you received 100 and were invoiced for 99 the clearing would reduce
    the stock value by 1
    Both examples are affected by the valuation type (Std price or MAP) but the end
    result is the same.
    After running it like this with small differences, the only uncleared items left
    would be the recent ones, or the "old" ones that have a bigger difference. You
    can then run MR11 with larger tolerances, view what would happen and either re
    run the same selection with update instead of list and clear these.
    You would eventually finish up with a manageable number of POs that don't
    balance and the value difference is quite large. You would then have to decide
    if you want to leave them as they are and wait for the open amount to be
    invoiced (or GRd), or you can manually clear them by selecting the individual
    line and then selecting the clear from the menu options.
    At the end of this process you should only have POs that are awaiting further
    postings.
    You would also have to financially clear the entries that have been cleared in
    MR11 but this would be via the normal financial clearing transactions.
    Best Regards
    Kiran

  • Need manual input of gl account- good issue against order

    Hi experts
    I want to give manual gl account when user issue a material against plan maintenance order(iw31). Is it possible? Or how i can assign a gl when i issue a material to order.
    Please help me to solve the problem.

    u can manually change the GL in the Order . At GI it wont be possible .

Maybe you are looking for