MAP is in negative

Hi all
I have got an error while doing MIRO for an IMPORT material.. The eror is,
"Posting not possible. MAP is in negative"
While i displayed material master price it get reduced heavily..
What are the possible reasons for this... These kind of error i get only while posting LIV for import material..
Thx in advance,
Yuvi.

Hi,
One of the reson is foreign currency involvement at the time of GR or MIRO.
If you do delivery item GR in $ insted of INR it is possibility of this error.since MAP disturbes in this case. If for ezample u post $15000 insted of INR15000 then error in price for INR600000 almost and gives this error.
Some informatory SAp notes are available like 66754.(only information)
Solution is to revaluate material in MR21 or MR22 .
Regards
Kedar
Edited by: Kedar Kulkarni on Apr 3, 2008 10:16 AM

Similar Messages

MAP value negative in material master

Hi,
I am facing problem with few materials where the stock exists but the MAP value is negative.
Movements 101,102,201,261 has taken place. Checked the material documents and did not find any problem in any of the movements.
Is changing the MAP value in MR21 is advicable?? Will this create any problem in FI accounting??
Pls advice.
Regards,
Radha

HI,
What is that material type.
Check is there any sales against that material with less cost of MAP .
The system shows that less amount as negative from the finanace point of view.
So check any salaes docs agianst that material.
Regards,
Andra

Negative MAP value for finished goods

Hi ,
There is a finished product with price control as 'S' while doing the production order settlement system gave the message that the moving average price is negative.
This is inhouse material ..and not procured from vendor ..
there was no stock at that moment ,and the standard price was released ..
there was stock on 10'th feb which was consumed on the subsequent days ..
Could you throw some light on this ?
Could you also let me know how the system updaes MAP in such cases ??
Regards,
Kedar

As mentioned in my earlier reply, if material is maintained on price control 'V', then system tries to settle the variance to inventory. In such case, if the variance is favourable i.e. Actual cost is less than the standard cost, the negative variance will reduce the value of inventory and as a result MAP. If the inventory value is less than the amount of variance, system issues a message that MAP will become negative.
Hope this clear the issue. If yes, please award points
Regards
Rakesh Pawaskar
Message was edited by:
Rakesh Pawaskar

Error: moving average price negative while doing MIRO

Hi Experts,
I am doing MIRo for PO where its giving me error while posting the Invoice that:
Moving average price for material is negative: XSEPSNPW045CX 1044
The MAP maintained in material master is 39,979.71 and in the invoice and GRN is 69,049.58.
Can any please help me to resolve this.
what would be the implications if the price difference is too high b/w MAP in Invoice amount.
and
what happen when we paintain the amount in mr21.
Regards,
Sonali.

Hi,
Pls check your price in MMR (MAP price) and then check the IR price of material ....
Example:
MMR MAP Price = 5.00 EUR
If IR price = 30 .00 Eur
IN YOUR CASE:
The MAP maintained in material master is 39,979.71
and in the invoice and GRN is 69,049.58.
So MAP PRice defined in the MMR is lesser than the IR price...
so the MAP will get negative...
Hope it helps...
Regards
Priyanka.P
AWARD IF HELPFULL
Edited by: Priyanka Paltanwale on Sep 2, 2008 7:49 AM

Valuated stock becomes negative-Error

Dear all,
when confirming the Pro.order, as per the BOM,all the mat components should be issued/consumed to Production.
But,during this process,system is giving Error message and not allowing to move forward.
with respect to one raw mat component,the Error is like below
VALUATED STOCKS BECOME NEGATIVE
What might be the reason for this error? Please suggest the way.

Hi,
Reasons for the message is at the time of issuing, because of MAP formula your MAP is becoming negative. System will not allow to post the document.
Possible reasons are:
by any reasons your MAP of material becomes very low.
your invoices are pending to book of goods inward.
invoice had been booked for low value than GRN value.
If you do not find any problem with material's price than you need to change it through MR21 and post the document.
Regards,
Bhagat

Prob. in challan de mapping

When de map the challan of March month
It shows
Unable to save challan mapping due to negative entry in Total Number of Employees Partially Mapped

Hello
Regarding your query, the issue reported by you basically happens due to inconsistent mapping or unmapping of the employees to the Challan.
We would suggest you to kindly delete of the negative entry from the table 'T7INTE'. You also need to delete the entries from the table PCL4 as well for the corresponding challan for which the negative entry has been created. Performing the above suggested steps will remove the reported inconsistencies. After deleting the entries completely, kindly perform the Challan mapping for the employees again. Please make sure that you are not deleting the entry from the table for which Form24Q
has already been generated.
The deletion process can be explained as such:
1. Execute the transaction 'se16'. Go to the tables mentioned above. You can execute the table 'T7INTE' with the TAN number. On execution,a negative entry will be displayed for a particular challan. Select that entry and delete of the entry from the table.
2. Go to table PCL4. Execute the table with relid as 'I1' to 'I2' and the TAN number in the field 'SRTFD' as 'TAN number'. On Execution, you will find all the employees mapped to that particular TAN with the corresponding period dates. Delete of the entries for the period for which there existed a negative entry in the table 'T7INTE'.
3. After deleting the entries successfully from both the above tables, kindly performing the mapping action again.
Thanks and Kind Regards
Ramana

MAP value for sub materials from New(Main) Material

Hi all
I got an issue in Kit breaking i.e. i got one material(main) which contains 10 of sub materials.Now when i am receiving the main material, i will receive with a value assume as 10000 bugs.
Now i would like to know that the 10000 bugs can be splited equally between all the 10 materials automatically.
All the 10 material are newly created with MAP value as zero.
Regards
Praveen

As mentioned in my earlier reply, if material is maintained on price control 'V', then system tries to settle the variance to inventory. In such case, if the variance is favourable i.e. Actual cost is less than the standard cost, the negative variance will reduce the value of inventory and as a result MAP. If the inventory value is less than the amount of variance, system issues a message that MAP will become negative.
Hope this clear the issue. If yes, please award points
Regards
Rakesh Pawaskar
Message was edited by:
Rakesh Pawaskar

ISE problem "Joined to domain but disconnected"

Hi all experts.
I recently have experienced this issue.
I have been using ISE1.1.2.145 and joined to AD since the ISE was released, but never seen this error before.
I did not touch any configuration and I was trying to test CWA with multiple WLCs.
I finished all configuration about CWA, and I was verifing if it is working.
while I was trying to login as user on AD, I could not. so I looked up on External Identity Source and it apears.
does anyone know why it is giving me that error ?
the ISE and AD both see the same NTP and time difference between them is only 1 minute, timezone is same.
even though they are looking at the same NTP, it's outside of private network and it is isolated.
also, I am able to ping each other. DNS is working. I don't see why it is not working......
can anyone help me with this problem ?

I had this issue as well but my NTP settings were correct and the time was not slipped at all.
I logged into the cli and ran this: #sh logging application ad_agent.log tail
which led me to this error:
2013-11-15T07:55:57.177566-06:00 host-psn1 adclient[10469]: INFO base.bind.healing Lost connection to DVN.COM(GC). Running in disconnected mode: KDC refused skey: Preauthentication failed
2013-11-15T07:55:57.282448-06:00 host-psn1 adclient[10469]: ERROR base.adagent Can't use default machine password. Please reset computer account in Active Directory.
Go into Active Directory Users and Computers and right click on the computer account object and click reset account.
Which resulted in these log entries:
2013-11-15T07:57:57.473370-06:00 host-psn1 adclient[10469]: INFO samba.interop Attempting interoperability with untested Samba version .
2013-11-15T07:57:58.266485-06:00 host-psn1 adclient[10469]: INFO base.bind.healing Reconnected to odcmsadrw002p.dvn.com(GC). Running in connected
mode.
2013-11-15T07:58:25.006230-06:00 host-psn1 adclient[10469]: INFO daemon.main Start trusted domain discovery
2013-11-15T07:58:25.058151-06:00 host-psn1 adclient[10469]: INFO daemon.main Trusted domain discovery complete : 4 domains found
2013-11-15T07:58:25.058189-06:00 host-psn1 adclient[10469]: INFO daemon.main Have new domain info map: flushing all negative objects
2013-11-15T07:58:25.100676-06:00 host-psn1 adclient[10469]: INFO base.kerberos.krb5conf Wrote /etc/krb5.conf
That fixed me up. Hope this helps someone else out there.

Questions on Elevation Service

Hello,
I have problems using the elevation service.
I can't determine if the problem comes from a misunderstanding of the feature on my part or simply a design choice of the service.
I display a map of the oceans with a Pin in the water, I want the pin to move on the water and get blocked by the coasts.
The pin is moving using an Animation module, written by Ricky Brundritt: Bring your maps to life
I am working on a modified version of this module to validate that every steps of the animation is in the water by calling only once, the Elevation Service but it always returns me '50' !!
I have built a JSFiddle to demonstrate that :
JSFiddle
In this JSFiddle, I am loading a short series of coordinates and I build the URL.
Clicking on a radio buttons, one can choose from the SeaLevel or List API or even Google Maps...
I have removed my key from the sample but with a valid key inserted in the javascript, you can test the URL or modify it and click on the button to get the values returned by the service. The call to Google Maps doesn't work in this sample but the URL that
gets generated works in a browser and returns data to looks valid to me.
I would need help to find how the Bing Services can give me values that will tell me how deep is the water, I don't like to compare but the Google Maps service return negative numbers in this scenario. Does this data exists in Bing or is there a workaround
or a plan to include them ?
Thanks for any help,
Claude

The elevation service is for elevations on land only and has no valid data over water.
http://rbrundritt.wordpress.com

Production order with negative amount for settlement in to Material for MAP

Hi All,
When I am trying to settle some production orders, it is giving me an error "Moving average price for material is negative" and doesnot let me settle them. we have maintained our materials at MAP and settle our production order variances to material to adjust its MAP. In these orders, it is trying to settle negative value, which is greater than the total value of the stock of materials and if settled leaving some of the stock with negative value. does any body has this situation and what would be the solution for this ?
Thanks
MKR

Hi,
This is Pavan Fronm IBGroup Rajnandgaon.
To My Knowledge,
When U Settle the Production Order, the Diffence Between the Target cost and Actual cost(MAP) of Finished Material hits the Material Account of the finished goods.
Say Suppose,
Target cost (Production Cost) =   Cost of Raw material + consumable,   = 10
                                                Activity ( Labour, Power, etc)              =    5
                                                Overheads.                                        =    2
                                                                                17
Actual Cost is ur Finished Material (MAP). = 18
CASE 1:
Now the system calculate the difference as 17 - 18 = -1 Rs , it try to reduce from Material Cost,
Now in case if Material has the stock say 1 unit.
it will reduce the cost of material by 1 rs in Material Master.
If the Material has no stock , as we know the system try to reduce the cost from zero stock tends to
give us a message saying
MOVING AVERAGE PRICE OF MATERIAL IS NEGATIVE.
CASE 2:
If Target - Actual is say +1 RS it increases the material price to 1 Rupee, if stock is Zero , then 1 Rupee
hits the Price Difference
CASE 3: *STANDARD PRICE INDICATOR*
In case of Standard Price indicator Every thing beyone the Material Price , whether respect to negative
variance or positive variance hits the price difference.
So I request u to settle the order if u use MAP for Finished goods befor dispatch of finished good to calculate actual production cost for ur finished material..
We can Also use MR21 for price change if the stock has dispatched befor settlement, but it is not suggestable to my knowledge hence ur material wont carry actual production cost if that is thae case.
Please Correct if I m Wrong.
Regards
J .K .PAVAN KUMAR
SAP PP-PI Consultant
Edited by: PAVANIDLUR on Mar 30, 2009 9:05 PM
Edited by: PAVANIDLUR on Mar 30, 2009 9:09 PM
Edited by: PAVANIDLUR on Mar 30, 2009 9:11 PM

Negative sign mapping handling for amount field

hi Experts,
From SAP ecc to PI we are receiving - negative sign after the amount value 1000 - . can you please suggest the suitable graphical mapping or UDF whenever amount value in -ve should give the ouput result as -1000. .
Regards,
Krushi.

Hi Krushi - I don't see any complexity in it..
Use graphical function "endswith" to check if the amount has "-"
If yes then use replace function to replace "-" and then again conact it with "-"
amount                              then amount->replacevlaue "-"-> concat + "-",amount
          endswith          if
-                                        else amount
For graphical function look at the below blog-
Standard Functions in PI 7.0 - Process Integration - SCN Wiki

Negative stock MAP change

Hi,
We had the negative stock like -2 , value is 0. after that through MR21 we changed the MAP 15 rs.
At that time system generates two FI documents entry.
Price difference a/c dr 30
to inventory a/c. 30
Inventory a/c dr 30
to price difference a/c.30
why it is so, system shoud generated 1st entry for finance point of view.
Please provide solution and process of this.
Kind regards

Go to SPRO>MM>IM>Goods Issue/Transfer posting>Allow negitive stock allowed for plant and then chose the plant and then go for the storage location --> mark the same.
If use ful award points

Impact of Negative Stock to MAP calculation

Hi,
I have some query on the impact of Negative Stock to MAP price calculation.
If letu2019s say now I have 10 unit of stock A u2013
Stock qty = 10
Price/unit= RM10
Total stock value = RM100
Then, I goods issue 200 unit of stock A -
Stock qty = -190
Stock value = -RM1900
Then, I goods receipt 200 unit again at diff cost, & the accounting posting is :~
Dr Stock RM 2050
Cr GR/IR RM 3000
Dr Inv Adjustment RM 950
Just wondering How system calculate RM2050? Any idea? The MAP had now changed to RM15/ unit.
Hope to get feedback from SAP guru.....Thanks!

Hi,
Stock qty = 10
Price/unit= RM10
Total stock value = RM100
Then, I goods issue 200 unit of stock A
Stock qty = -190
Stock value = -RM1900,
in this case sytem takes the MAP from the material master which is available, as 10 RM,
Then, I goods receipt 200 unit again at diff cost, & the accounting posting is
Dr Stock RM 2050
Cr GR/IR RM 3000
Dr Inv Adjustment RM 950
in the above case u have received the GRN with 15RM,
means the MAP is update with the new price,
and the difference 950 is also adjusted through inventory adjusted posting,
rgds
chenna

GRC: Negative ack; PI: End tag 'enviNFe' does not match the start tag 'NFe'

Bom dia SAP Boosters!
Como muita gente estou aqui brigando com o GRC NFe. Esse forum tem resolvido meus problemas, até agora. Por isso inicio um novo tópico pois estou tendo o seguite problema que nao encontrei resposta:
O grc e o pi estao em servidores separados. Do lado do grc, na sxmb_moni mostra para a interface BATCH_nfeRecepcaoLote_OB erro no acknowledgement status. abrindo o item error do ack msg id aparece:
<SAP:Error SOAP:mustUnderstand="" xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="BPE_ADAPTER">NEGATIVE_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1></SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2></SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3></SAP:P3>
<SAP:P4></SAP:P4>
<SAP:AdditionalText></SAP:AdditionalText>
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace=""></SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage>
<SAP:Stack>Negative acknowledgment triggered by a process</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
No lado do PI, ao consultar esta interface e abrir o payload do item Request Message Mapping, aparece a mensagem de erro: End tag 'n0:enviNFe' does not match the start tag 'NFe'. e todo o xml fica em uma linha só.
Voltei entao no xml do sender e de fato encontrei a tag NFe, onde deveria constar os dados das notas fiscais, sendo aberta mas nao sendo fechada, e sem dados, desse jeito.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <n0:nfeRecepcaoLote2 xmlns:n0="http://sap.com/xi/NFE/006">
<n0:cUF>35</n0:cUF>
<n0:tpEmis>1</n0:tpEmis>
<n0:tpAmb>2</n0:tpAmb>
- <n0:nfeDadosMsg>
- <n0:enviNFe versao="2.00" xmlns:n0="http://www.portalfiscal.inf.br/nfe">
<n0:idLote>000000000000025</n0:idLote>
<n0:NFe asx:root="" xmlns:asx="http://www.sap.com/abapxml"></n0:NFe>
</n0:enviNFe>
</n0:nfeDadosMsg>
</n0:nfeRecepcaoLote2>
Alguém já viu esse bug? estou com grc 10 e SP 08 e das notas que sairam depois nenhuma fala disso.
Obrigado.

Fiz um teste que parou de dar erro de acknowledgement e chegou a enviar o lote para a sefaz, que retornou erro de schema porque o xml continua vazio:
Na interface determination gerada quando criei o cenário NFE_BATCH_WebAS_Outbound_Batch, a que contém a interface BATCH_nfeRecepcaoLote_OB, tirei o operation mapping BATCH_nfeRecepcaoLote2_TO_nfeRecepcaoLote2. Embora não seja mais retornada a mensagem de erro na tag, o payload continua no mesmo formato postado acima. Entao coloquei de volta.
Bem, pesquisando vi que a função que gera o xml é a /XNFE/006_SIGN_NFE_OUT. As notas aparecem como assinadas no monitor do grc, mas vou ter que ver entao como esta ocorrendo a geraçao do xml por esta funçao, certo?

How do you get your experts with negative stance for new things / innovations to HANA

We have over 50 ABAP developer (senior experts). Primarily we develop in the old core module (SD, MM, FI, CO, HR, PP, CS, IH, PS) on ERP systems / business suite.
We have three groups of developer:
Group 1: They can’t await to work on new architectures – they’re open for all and have fun to work as a pioneer and dig in the deep of the system
Group 2: For this developer it’s all the same – for this people it’s not a problem to go to a other architectures
Group 3: They have no interest
to work in new architectures
to spend time to learn new things
they are very closed for new things
they have for all topics bad statements
I am part of the group 1. In my opinion in the IT it’s normal to spend much time at new topics in free time to keep up to date. New topics / innovative things make the developer job very exciting. For me it’s regular process – and that’s my own passion .
Since two month we have our own HANA system in our data centre as play field :-) (business suite on SAP HANA). I’ve some colleagues who made the HANA certification – and we made the first steps in our system. For group 1 and group 2 everything is okay and they’ve fun .
We have problems with the group 3. They find every hair in the soup – they spend very much time to search arguments against HANA. That’s our “negative group” . We copied our SAP System to a new system and made a technical migration. Now they compare the SAP System, which is based on an oracle datebase, with the new SAP System which is based on a HANA System. They go through the standard ERP process (offer / order / purchase order / goods movements / delivery / MM invoice / SD invoice / material master data / customer master data / vendor master data / conditions / financial bookings / etc.). They main argument is, that they can’t see a grow up of the performance / the added value of the invest / etc. Our other problem is that the group of this people have experience over 20 years in ABAP developing – and their opinion have a high weight. The other arguments: IBM and oracle are working on similar architectures – and we can hold on on the open sqlsyntax / on the present coding.
Have you similar problems to get the acceptance of group 3?
Have you tips / tricks for us?
Have you ideas for catching the group 3?
What standard components are really optimized for HANA?
In which standard components can we see a really performance grow up?
There are standard use cases to see the differences?
Which data volume do we need in the data model to see the differences?
What can we do to take the group 3 with us?
How can we open the group 3 for innovations?

Hi,
Please find my reply below.
1. Have you similar problems to get the acceptance of group 3?
In IT world we have similar groups. Only results help this group3. I would suggest showcasing on results.
2. Have you tips / tricks for us?
As you mentioned in your email, you already have HANA System to play with. So I would suggest looking at high performance transactions like MRP run and FICO Month-end Close.
3. Have you ideas for catching the group 3?
SAP has few use cases. Take-up these use cases build data models and use in ERP.
4. What standard components are really optimized for HANA?
Recently in our organization we replaced database from DB2 with HANA. Now our SAP ECC is running on HANA. Straight away we have seen 30% of performance improvement in all the transactions. SAP is providing optimized SAP Transactions and there is significant performance improvement and SAP Road Map clearly talks about providing more optimized SAP Transactions on top of HANA to its customers.
We tried to push some of our high performance code to DB layer by creating the Data Models and using those views in SAP ABAP Programs or Transactions. This gave us significant performance improvement.
Please refer to below document. This has list of standard optimized transactions.
Link
5. In which standard components can we see a really performance grow up?
This blog throws light on following high performance transactions.
Link
6. There are standard use cases to see the differences?
Use Case
7. Which data volume do we need in the data model to see the differences?
MRP run transaction has huge performance issue you can work on MRP Run data model.
8. What can we do to take the group 3 with us?
Only Proof of Concepts (POC) results will help to take this group.
9. How can we open the group 3 for innovations?
As per your email, I feel group 3 is most demotivated group. I would suggest to talk to each individual and understand there areas of interest and try to put them in their areas of interest. As per my experience this will give good results.
-VJ.

MAP is in negative

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for