Mapping error in Response

Hi
I am invoking a Java Webservice deployed on a Apache Axis server using a SOAP Adapter Receiver and a HTTP sender for sending the request message(thro a HTTP client).In the pipeline while retrieving the Response I get a Error message "NO_MAPPINGPROGRAM_FOUND"
<SAP:ReliableMessaging>
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">NO_MAPPINGPROGRAM_FOUND</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>http://sap.com/xi/WebAppl/StockQuote STOCKRequesttoWSDL</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2 />
But the Interface mapping STOCKRequesttoWSDL is set properly with Request and Response mappings.I dont understand where this error is coming from..Has anyone faced this problem before?

You can use the XMLAnonymizer module with your adapter (if you are using SOAP adapter for the call as HTTP adapter does not support modules) to remove the namespaces. Kindly check the following blogs for modules:
Gabriel Sagaya Selvam - Standard Adapter Framework modules in PI 7.1 u2013Part 1
/people/gabrielsagayaselvam.panneerselvam/blog/2009/12/07/standard-adapter-framework-modules-afmodules-in-pi-71-150part-1
Gabriel Sagaya Selvam - Standard Adapter Framework modules in PI 7.1 u2013Part 2
/people/gabrielsagayaselvam.panneerselvam/blog/2009/12/07/standard-adapter-framework-modules-afmodules-in-pi-71-150part-2
Regards,
Gökhan

Similar Messages

Soap response mapping error

hi
i got payload of response from webservice as below;
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <m:requestResponse xmlns:m="http://tempuri.org/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<result xsi:type="xsd:string">20060911tt11</result>
</m:requestResponse>
when i test mapping with above contents in mapping test tab, i got mapping error as blow;
16:03:59 Start of test
Cannot produce target element /ns1:Rnumber_MT/rnum. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd Cannot produce target element /ns1:Rnumber_MT/rnum. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd
16:03:59 End of test
source side in MM_response, comming from wsdl for MT.
result          xsd:string
target side in MM_response, i created DT, MT.
Rnumber_MT
         |__
             rnum xsd:string
i sent data to webservice succesfully, and i can see return value as well, but mapping error.
please guide me.
thanks in advance
venjamin

hi
in response procedure;
my scenario abap proxy 2 soap sync
1. response from webserivce --> r/3
there is no DT, MT due to coming from wsdl.
only i can see result xsd:string
2. data type for r/3
   Rnumber_DT
       rnum xsd:string
   message type Rnumber_MT
   Rnumber_MT
       |_
           rnum xsd:string
3. mapping for response
   1. source (webservice)
     external message : requestResponse
     result xsd:string
   2. target (r/3)
   Rnumber_MT
       |_
           rnum xsd:string
   i did map ,,, result ---> rnum..
here is payload for response from webservice....
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <m:requestResponse xmlns:m="http://tempuri.org/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<result xsi:type="xsd:string">20060911tt11</result>
</m:requestResponse>
please help me
thanks in advance
venjamin

Map XI System Error to Response

Hello,
I have a synchronous scenario HTTP --> XI --> RFC.
If R/3 gets timed out, I need to send timeout error in Response.
Is that possible?
I dont want to use BPM for this.
Thanks in advance,
Beena.

Hello Bhavesh,
Yes, you are right.
When you use the http client available on web, you get the error message back.
However this client uses ActiveX and same code can not be used in our application.
So we have used following code:
URL HttpUrl = new URL(URL);
HttpURLConn= (HttpURLConnection) HttpUrl.openConnection();
HttpURLConn.setDoOutput(true);
HttpURLConn.setRequestMethod("POST");
OutputStreamWriter out = new OutputStreamWriter(
                                                    HttpURLConn.getOutputStream());
out.write(request);
out.close();
BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(                            new InputStreamReader(
          HttpURLConn.getInputStream()));
String inputLine;
while ((inputLine = in.readLine()) != null)
                            response = response + inputLine;
in.close();
                       HttpURLConn.disconnect();
and we get following error:
java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 500 for URL: http://sapxi:8000/sap/xi/adapter_plain?namespace=&interface=&service=Srv_Web&QOS=BE&sap-user=&sap-password=&sap-client=110&sap-language=EN
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(HttpURLConnection.java:791)
        at com.reliant.b2b.adapters.net.xi.XIHttpAdapterConnection.submit(XIHttpAdapterConnection.java:112)
        at com.reliant.b2b.adapters.net.xi.XIHttpAdapterConnection.submit(XIHttpAdapterConnection.java:191)
        at com.reliant.b2b.adapters.data.internet.xi.HttpRequestHandler.parse(HttpRequestHandler.java:33)
        at com.reliant.b2b.adapters.net.xi.HttpAdapter.getResponse(HttpAdapter.java:33)
        at com.reliant.b2b.transactions.TransactionMonitor.run(TransactionMonitor.java:34)
Any Ideas??
Thanks,
Beena.

Strange Data Mapping Errors after SEM 6 Upgrade. Please assist.

Hi All, I encountered these sudden Mapping errors after I tried to do Testing in Post Upgrade Sand Box. Here I am trying to to perform Collected Reported Financial Data under Data Collection Method for a particular Company Code 3040. Kindly help me with some quick responses as this is kind of high priority. The errors and the Diagnosis Notes I am unable to follow as I do not where I shall write those Mapping Rules they are referring to. I do not even know if that need to apply any SAP Notes as such. Once again Highly appreciate your quick response and Many Thanks in Advance.
Regards, BIP
Input conversion for field Period Value LC has invalid format Message no. UCT8210 Diagnosis The mapping rule for target field Period Value LC contains a move with a selected Input Conversion indicator. Therefore, the system performs an input conversion prior to creating the target data. However, an error in the input conversion occurred while moving the source key figure to the target key figure Period Value LC. This means that the format used for the input conversion is incompatible with the target data. System Response The system will not perform the move. Procedure Examine the mapping rule for field Period Value LC. Either select the Conversion Exit indicator or deselect the Input Conversion indicator. Execute the method again. -
3040 is incompatible with input format for field /1FB/COMPANY Message no. UCT8258 Diagnosis During execution, the method derives the source selection for source field /1FB/COMPANY from the mapping rule for the target field. 3040 is one of the values that were derived for the source selection. The system requires that this value is in the correct SAP-internal format because the Conversion Exit indicator has been selected in the move operator for field /1FB/COMPANY. However, the value 3040 is incompatible with the SAP-internal format. System Response The system attempts to interpret value 3040 as an external format and convert it to the internal format. If this fails, the system is unable to restrict the source selection using source field /1FB/COMPANY. In this case, the system may read more source data than was originally intended, which can affect performance. Procedure In the log, choose the Source button to display the source selections that are used to read the source data. When this appears, examine values selected for field /1FB/COMPANY. If the correct values were selected, you can ignore this message. To prevent this message from being issued, you can select the indicator in the mapping rule used by source field /1FB/COMPANY. If incorrect values were selected, make sure that the mapping rule used by source field /1FB/COMPANY has been defined correctly. If the mapping rule is correct and value (3040) derived for the source selection does not affect the overall result, you can ignore this message. If the source selection does not contain the value 3040 for field /1FB/COMPANY and, because of this, source data that is supposed to be read is not being read, make sure that the mapping rule has been defined correctly. If the source selection does not contain any value for field /1FB/COMPANY, make an estimation as to how much excess source data is being read and whether this might affect system performance. If you do not expect any performance problems, you can ignore this message. In any event, you have the following alternatives if the mapping rule is defined correctly, but the source selection on field /1FB/COMPANY is unsatisfactory: You can define a source selection for field /1FB/COMPANY in the Customizing settings for the method on the Selection tab page. Then the method uses this source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. You can implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER and use the method INVERT to determine the source selection on field /1FB/COMPANY. Then the method uses the result of the INVERT method for the source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. -
Cannot derive the source selection from target field Version Message no. UCT8252 Diagnosis Field Version has one of the following roles: Consolidation unit Group currency key Fiscal year Posting period Version To delimit the volume of the source data to be read, the system usually derives the source selection from the target selection of such a field. However, the system cannot derive a source selection from field Version. System Response It is possible that a greater volume of source data is being read than is necessary. This can lead to performance issues. Procedure Check whether a mapping rule is defined for field Version. If a mapping rule is defined, you can disregard this warning message. However, if you discover after method execution that the system did not process a large amount of data, and that system performance was not satisfactory, you may want to examine the source selection by choosing the Source button in the log. If the reason for the disregarded data is that too much source data was read because of the unrestricted selection on the source field (which is linked with target field Versionthrough mapping), choose one of the alternatives below: Change the mapping rule for field Version so that the system can derive a delimiting source selection. Implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER with the method INVERT to delimit the selection for the source field that is linked via mapping to the target field Version. -
Cannot derive the source selection from target field Group Currency Message no. UCT8252 Diagnosis Field Group Currency has one of the following roles: Consolidation unit Group currency key Fiscal year Posting period Version To delimit the volume of the source data to be read, the system usually derives the source selection from the target selection of such a field. However, the system cannot derive a source selection from field Group Currency. System Response It is possible that a greater volume of source data is being read than is necessary. This can lead to performance issues. Procedure Check whether a mapping rule is defined for field Group Currency. If a mapping rule is defined, you can disregard this warning message. However, if you discover after method execution that the system did not process a large amount of data, and that system performance was not satisfactory, you may want to examine the source selection by choosing the Source button in the log. If the reason for the disregarded data is that too much source data was read because of the unrestricted selection on the source field (which is linked with target field Group Currency through mapping), choose one of the alternatives below: Change the mapping rule for field Group Currency so that the system can derive a delimiting source selection. Implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER with the method INVERT to delimit the selection for the source field that is linked via mapping to the target field Group Currency
1 is incompatible with input format for field FISCPERIOD Message no. UCT8258 Diagnosis During execution, the method derives the source selection for source field FISCPERIOD from the mapping rule for the target field. 1 is one of the values that were derived for the source selection. The system requires that this value is in the correct SAP-internal format because the Conversion Exit indicator has been selected in the move operator for field FISCPERIOD. However, the value 1 is incompatible with the SAP-internal format. System Response The system attempts to interpret value 1 as an external format and convert it to the internal format. If this fails, the system is unable to restrict the source selection using source field FISCPERIOD. In this case, the system may read more source data than was originally intended, which can affect performance. Procedure In the log, choose the Source button to display the source selections that are used to read the source data. When this appears, examine values selected for field FISCPERIOD. If the correct values were selected, you can ignore this message. To prevent this message from being issued, you can select the indicator in the mapping rule used by source field FISCPERIOD. If incorrect values were selected, make sure that the mapping rule used by source field FISCPERIOD has been defined correctly. If the mapping rule is correct and value (1) derived for the source selection does not affect the overall result, you can ignore this message. If the source selection does not contain the value 1 for field FISCPERIOD and, because of this, source data that is supposed to be read is not being read, make sure that the mapping rule has been defined correctly. If the source selection does not contain any value for field FISCPERIOD, make an estimation as to how much excess source data is being read and whether this might affect system performance. If you do not expect any performance problems, you can ignore this message. In any event, you have the following alternatives if the mapping rule is defined correctly, but the source selection on field FISCPERIOD is unsatisfactory: You can define a source selection for field FISCPERIOD in the Customizing settings for the method on the Selection tab page. Then the method uses this source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. You can implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER and use the method INVERT to determine the source selection on field FISCPERIOD. Then the method uses the result of the INVERT method for the source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule
Input must be in the format ___,___,__~ Message no. 00088 Diagnosis Your entry does not match the specified input format. System Response The entry in this field was rejected. Procedure The entry must comply with the edit format. The following edit format characters have a special meaning: "_" (underscore) There should be an input character at this point; this should be a number for numeric fields. "." (decimal point) (applies to numeric fields) The decimal point occurs here (setting in the user master record). "," (thousands separator) (applies to numeric fields) This separator occurs (optionally) for more than three figures. Depending on the setting in the user master record, it can be a period or a comma. "V" (applies to numeric fields) The operational sign appears here. If used, it must by at the right margin of the field. The sign is either "-" or " "(space). "~" (tilde) (applies to numeric fields) As of and including this character, leading zeros must also be entered. Otherwise, this character has the same meaning as an underscore. Leading zeros need not be entered on the left of the tilde. They are not output at this position. All other characters have their normal meanings and must be entered in the same position as in the edit format.

Hi Dan,
Could you Kiindly advise me where we need to write the Mapping Rules in Consolidation Monitor? All he time the errors refering to Mapping Rules. The only Tab I seen "Mapping" is in Data Basis But as per my Understanding Iwe do not have much to do there as it is system generated Mapping Tab.
Where we actually go and select/deselct those Input Conversion Indicator/ Conversion exit Indicator.
Highly appreciate your advise.
Thanks and Regards,
BIP

SOAP: error in response

Hi everybody,
we are requesting a SOAP. In RWM --> message monitorg we got the error
error in response
in SXMB we see the error:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="UNKNOWN">APPLICATION_ERROR</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText>application fault</SAP:AdditionalText>
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="">item</SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage>
<SAP:Stack />
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Does anybody know what to do?
The WebService seems to work if we use a dedicated client.
Does SAP XI really have a problem or is it the WebService (-reponse)?
Regards Mario

Mario,
Your Webservice is throwing a SOAP Fault or Application error.
see the payload in CallAdapter Step in response message. It will have a fault payload with details.
It is basically related to input data problem.
check the input data given to SOAP Request.
Regards,
Sudharshan N A

Soap(sync) to RFC(Sync Scenario ,error in response

Dear all,
For Sender,I created 2 message types
request
record
getdetail                        1..1
Response
Details
Records                       0..1
items                             1-- unbounded
1                                    0-1
2                                     0--1
3                                     0--1
4                                     0--1
The Rfc is imported in to Imported objects which has similar structure as source i.e same occurrences and higher levels.
I took 2 message mappings
1)MT request to RFC Request
2)MT Response tp RFC Response
Operation mapping
req_out(MT req,MT_res)---- RFC(MT)
The problem is while testing in operation mapping ,I am getting error in Response.
in Message mapping as an individual mapping it is working fine(tested in mm test tab).
I did not configure the ID,Is it required to get the response.
if not pls provide me pointers on the same.
We are using PI7.3,are there any changes in generating and publishing the WSDL.
Can I use Integrated configaration for this scenario.
If I use it where to pudlish wsdl as there will be no sender agreement to publish in SR.
Thanks
Pi

Hi,
>>>The problem is while testing in operation mapping ,I am getting error in Response.
COnfiguration objects need to be created & test as full scenario.
B'cos, it need to hit RFC of ECC & provide back the response.
>>>in Message mapping as an individual mapping it is working fine(tested in mm test tab).
so, the mapping part is working fine.
>>>I did not configure the ID,Is it required to get the response.
if not pls provide me pointers on the same.
Yes. configure the ID objects.
>>>We are using PI7.3,are there any changes in generating and publishing the WSDL.
Not sure, but, it should be same. Create all the objects & generate the WSDL.
>>>Can I use Integrated configaration for this scenario.
Yes. it can be used.
>>>If I use it where to pudlish wsdl as there will be no sender agreement to publish in SR.
why NO SA. it should be created in this scenario.
-santosh.

Handling/Mapping a SOAP response message back to the RFC request Message

Hi
I was wondering if you could kindly offer some advice on how to handle the SOAP response back to an RFC in a RFC>SOAP>RFC.Response scenario. When executing an RFC function module that triggers a message to XI, the outbound message seems to process successfully, however, there is an error in the response message. I am not sure how to map the response back to the function module response message because it looks like the response payload is empty. It is also strange that the interface seems to run in synchronous mode despite being configured as an asynchronous interface. If it ran in asynchronous mode, there would not be a problem because we actually do not need a response back. The interface also runs perfectly when executing it from the Runtime Workbench, and it also runs in asynchronous mode as it should.
I would really appreciate any suggestions on how to solve this problem.
Thank you,
Brendon

Hi Reyaz,
This is actually an RFC-->SOAP scenario where the message structure of the source and target systems are different. We don't actually need a reponse back from the SOAP system. I was wondering if you perhaps know how we can cancel the Response response back to the requestor or at leaset map the SOAP response back?
The interface runs perfectly in asynchronous mode when executing it from the Runtime Workbench in the test section, but it runs in synchronous mode for some reason when executing the RFC function call in SAP.
Thank you,
Brendon

Adobe Print Form Error - Invalid Response Code: (401) Unauthorized

Hi, I've just configured ADS on Netweaver 2004s. I've run through the config guide and everything works ok including the form generation test report FP_TEST_00 which outputs PDF without issue. I have two problems:
-When I run a "test connection" on the RFC destination 'ADS' using the ADSUSER for the login details, I get a 403 not authorized error. Changing this user to J2EE_ADMIN resolves the issue and I get a 302 redirect. I've tried adding other permissions to the ADSUSER without any luck.
-Running a report on the Portal under e.g. Executive Reporting and attempting to just right-click and hit "Print Version" results in a 401 error for request "http://hostXX:portXX/AdobeDocumentServices/Config?style=document" exactly as per this thread: Re: Adobe Form Creation Error - Invalid Response Code: (401) Unauthorized. However, I've double-checked all user details in Visual Administrator (ADS_AGENT) and on the ABAP stack side in su01 and sm59. I also tried changing the users to dialog with no effect. If I go directly to that URL and log in with ADSUSER I get a 403 not authorised error (using J2EE_ADMIN is again successful). I've noticed that in the http access log the HTTP protocol used is 1.1 when using the web browser and 1.0 when using the sm59 connection test. I've heard of problems with using HTTP/1.1, but when I change the options on IE8 to use HTTP/1.0, it changes for all other requests except the request for "http://hostXX:portXX/AdobeDocumentServices/Config?style=document", which is still submitted as HTTP/1.1. Conversely, in sm59 if I specify that it should use HTTP/1.1 under Special Options, I can see from the access log that it is in fact still using HTTP/1.0. Could this be related to the 401 error code that I'm seeing?
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks,
John

I think I've ruled out the HTTP protocol version as being an issue here. However I may have found more useful information on the actual issue.
In the security log under usr\sap\<SID>\DVEBMGS00\j2ee\cluster\server0\log\system I see a different message for the unsuccessful report PDF generation attempt to that of a direct query to the same URL with the same web browser, as below. The unsuccessful attempt appears to forget the ADSUSER credentials and resort to the default J2EE_GUEST which has no authorisations and therefore fails. The direct query doesn't lose the ADSUSER credentials and I think this is because it prompts for the user/password when needed. Does anyone know why this happens for a direct query to this URL but not for the PDF generation attempt?
Resulting logs from unsuccessful PDF generation attempt:
#1.5 #005056AF1EB300750000002D0000142000048B4D2208F055#1279063306899#/System/Security/WS/SecurityProtocol#sap.com/irj#com.sap.security.core.client.ws.AuthenticationContext.setDestination#AICL0001#622##<host>_<sid>_3576650#AICL0001#4c1a62608ed511dfbe2a005056af1eb3#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_5##0#0#Info#1#com.sap.security.core.client.ws.AuthenticationContext#Java###An destination was set with the following properties:
{0}.#1#{PROXY_ENABLED=false, CLIENT_AUTHENTICATION_KEYSTORE_VIEW=, SAP_SID=, SLD_URL=, USERNAME=ADSUSER, SLD_WS_NAME=, URL=http://<host>:50000/AdobeDocumentServices/Config?style=document, PROXY_URL=, SSL_SERVER_AUTHENTICATION=IGNORE, SLD_WS_SYSTEM_NAME=, PASSWORD=XXX, SLD_WS_PORT=, SAP_CLIENT=, DEFAULT_URL=http://localhost:50000/AdobeDocumentServices/Config?style=document, Authentication=BASIC, CLIENT_AUTHENTICATION_KEYSTORE_CERTIFICATE=, URL_CHOICE=Custom, SAP_LANGUAGE=}#
#1.5 #005056AF1EB30072000000250000142000048B4D220A12ED#1279063306977#/System/Security/Authentication##com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logincontext#J2EE_GUEST#0##<host>_<sid>_3576650#Guest#4c1a62608ed511dfbe2a005056af1eb3#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_24##0#0#Info#1#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logincontext#Plain###LOGIN.FAILED
User: N/A
Authentication Stack: com.adobe/AdobeDocumentServices*AdobeDocumentServices_Config
Login Module                                                               Flag        Initialize Login      Commit     Abort      Details
1. com.sap.engine.services.security.server.jaas.BasicPasswordLoginModule   SUFFICIENT ok          exception             true       Authentication did not succeed.#
Successful direct access of URL http://<host>:50000/AdobeDocumentServices/Config?style=document (click on rpData test and manually log in as ADSUSER):
#1.5 #005056AF1EB30070000000250000142000048B4D3E260016#1279063778670#/System/Security/Authentication##com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logincontext#ADSUSER#675##<host>_<sid>_3576650#Guest#812f72008ed611dfa62d005056af1eb3#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_14##0#0#Info#1#com.sap.engine.services.security.authentication.logincontext#Plain###LOGIN.OK
User: ADSUSER
Authentication Stack: com.adobe/AdobeDocumentServices*AdobeDocumentServices_Config
Login Module                                                               Flag        Initialize Login      Commit     Abort      Details
1. com.sap.engine.services.security.server.jaas.BasicPasswordLoginModule   SUFFICIENT ok          true       true
Central Checks                                                                                true                  #
#1.5 #005056AF1EB30070000000260000142000048B4D3E2666A6#1279063778702#/System/Security/Audit/J2EE##com.sap.engine.services.security.roles.audit#ADSUSER#675##<host>_<sid>_3576650#ADSUSER#812f72008ed611dfa62d005056af1eb3#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_14##0#0#Info#1#com.sap.engine.services.security.roles.audit#Java###{0}: Authorization check for caller assignment to J2EE security role [{1} : {2}].#3#ACCESS.OK#SAP-J2EE-Engine#all#

Error:SOAP: response message contains an error XIAdapter/PARSING/ADAPTER.SOAP_EXCEPTION - soap fault: Server was unable to read request. --- There is an error in XML document (1, 447). --- Input string was not in a correct format.

Hi All,
We have a scenario of FTP-->PI---> Webservice. While triggering the data in the FTP, it is failing in the PI with the below error
SOAP: response message contains an error XIAdapter/PARSING/ADAPTER.SOAP_EXCEPTION - soap fault: Server was unable to read request. ---> There is an error in XML document (1, 447). ---> Input string was not in a correct format.
Can you please help?

Hi Raja- It seems to be a data quality issue.
Check for the value @ 1447 position in the xml message that you are trying to send to web service..
may be a date filed/decimal value which is not in expected format.

Mapping error in PI 7.1

Hi All,
When i am trying to create a new mapping or coyping the existing mapping(which is already activated) , i am not able to activate the mapping . I am getting the following error :
Source text of object Message Mapping: new |
urn:abc:MessageOut has syntax errors: Source code has syntax error:
Source strcuture and everything is perfect as i had created previous mapping using the same source structure.
Please advice as to what might be the issue here and what is the solution.
Regards
Vinay P.

In each and every mapping which is already avialble in IR and the new ones that i am trying to create ...i am getting the followin exception throughout if press F7 in the mapping ...as a result u cant actiavte any changes in the existing mapping nor in the new mapping
Error:
Source text of object Message Mapping:
Mapping name| urn:abc:namespace:SI_Interface has syntax errors: Source code has syntax error:
Regards
Vinay P.

Java.util.EmptyStackException Mapping error

Hi All,
I am integrating SAP ECC 6.0 system with SAP SNC.
For these i am using standard content of SAP SNC
I am getting following mapping error :
TransformerConfigurationException occurred when loading XSLT InvoiceRequest_InvoicInvoic01_01.xsl; details: Could not load stylesheet.com.sap.engine.lib.xml.util.NestedException: Error parsing query. -> java.util.EmptyStackException
Plz help me out
Regards Milan

hi,
check the interaface mapping which is used in your flow
inside integration repository - is it working over there?
do you see the XSL file in the external archives in repository?
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk
http://mypigenie.com XI/PI FAQ

Multi-Mapping Error after copying into new namespace

Hi everybody,
we got a BPM running using a multi-mapping.
We decided to design new namespaces. After copying every IR object (datatype, message-type, mappings etc.) --> SXMB_MONI shows a mapping-error.
But when I take the payload and test the mapping, everything is fine?
Any ideas?
Regards Mario

Hi,
If your payload has Messages tab remove that..and test the payload.
Payload doesn't have any Messages tab.
Just i have given example payload..this payload two strucures it will split into twofiles..and compare your payload should be like same
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<STRUCTURE>
<EMP_DETAILS>
   <EMPNO>123<EMPNO>
   <EMPNAME>XYZ<EMPNAME>
<EMP_DETAILS>
<STUDENT_DET>
   <STUO>123<STUNO>
   <STUNAME>XYZ<STUNAME>
</STUDENT_DET>
<STRUCTURE>
Regards,
Venu.

Catch Mapping Error in File to IDoc scenario

Configured BPM and now learning Error Handling. I know that through BPM we can handle system Errors, but I doubt whether Mapping error is a system error.
I am interested to know the classification of errors with examples, preferably listing out all types of errors.
Please provide some weblogs or explain briefly how to handle system and application errors through BPM.
Thanks,
Raja

Hi Raja,
You will need CCMS if you want to send the Alerts to external system or you want to access the ALerts from the transaction. You can capture your alerts without this also.
When you go to Alert Configuration in the Runtime Workbench you can see Create Alert Rules. These rules are pertaining to the error generated in your AF,AE or IE.
Once you have completed the whole config. The error happening in the AE, IE or AF would trigger the alert. you can see this in your Alert Inbox.
The best would be if you go through the URL I have mentioned below.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/80/942f3ffed33d67e10000000a114084/content.htm
You have to use BPM only if you want to do an activity after the alerts are raised.
Regards
Vijaya
Message was edited by: vijaya kumari

Mapping Error in XI Configuration for MM-SUS Scenario

Dear Experts,
I am working on MM-SUS Classic Scenario,
We have done all basic setting in SRM, ECC and SUS.
Now we are configuring XI Scenario(Working on ESOA Architecture), while configuring XI Scenario, I follow the mention steps :
I have started from Integration Builder in XI (using T-code SXMB_IFR)
1. I have assigned two Business System( for ECC and SUS) In integration Builder (Creates Communication Channels Automatically) .
2. Modify IDOC and XI Communication in ERP and SUS Business system respectively.
3. Now select Tools -> Transer Integration Scenario from Inegration Repository and Create Scenario in it properly
(Included Assign Services, Configure Connections, Generate etc).
4. In last, save scenario.
After configuration XI I am not getting Scenario Data (Objects and Configuration Overview data) in it.
When i click to Check Configurability under Model Configurator of mine Scenario, I found following Errors ( I am Mentioning only some errors) :
Component View SE_Services_Procurement: Connection from Send Z_CREMAS_SUSMM to Business Partner empfangen has no mapping
Component View SE_Services_Procurement: Connection from Send_PO_From_MM to Receive_Purchase_Order has no mapping
Component View SE_Services_Procurement: Connection from ServiceAcknowledgementConfirmationRequest to ServiceAcknowledgementConfirmationCreate has no mapping
Component View SE_Services_Procurement: Connection from InvoiceRequest senden to Receive INVOIC has no mapping
Kindly correct me if am missing some, and help me out, what should have been done to remove this mapping errors.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Pawan Keshwani

If you are on >= SP9 you do not need to perform that action at all.
Go to SU01 transaction assign SAP_XI_DEVELOPER role for the desired users and try it.
regards
Shravan

Mapping Error in AAE in PI 7.1

Dear Team,
If we use message mapping along with AAE concept , What are the objects we need to create in ESR and ID .
How can we monitor the messages - messages failed with Mapping Error.Is there any new option available in RWB?
Thanks&Regards
Drumi

Hi,
ESR Objects are same but in ID we need to create Integrated configuration
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/700058f0-b1a1-2a10-39a8-ab2627b87cfa
If we are using AAE then we don't get any status in SXMB_MONI.
Regards,
Venkata Ramesh

Mapping error in Response

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for