Mapping Error : MEASURE FIELD

Hello SAP Gurus,
When I am loading external flate file I am getting the following erroe
THE FOLLOWING DOES NOT EXIT IN THE DATA FILE HEADER : [MEASURE FIELD].
Pleaselet me know what is Measue field and importance of this field.
Thanks.
WIth regards,
Anand KUmar

Hello,
Thanks again for promt reply.
I have solved the problem but I want to know the following points :
1) What is measure column?
2)  What´s the use?
3) Why is it needed in the transaction data?
Thanks in advance.
With regards,
Anand Kumar

Similar Messages

  • Target Field Mapping error

    i am having a source structure like
    <a>
    <b></b>
    <c>
       <1></1>
    </c>
    </a>
    and target structure like
    <x>
    <y></y>
    <z>
       <9></9>
    </z>
    </x>
    with
    1. ofcourse the roots mapped to each other
    2. an the element b is mapped to element y
    3. element c is mapped to z
    4. sub element 1 is mapped to sub element 9.
    The minOccurs for c, z, 1 and 9 =0.
    However, while execution of this mapping with the source element c missing in the payload a 'Cannot produce target element' error is encountered.
    Can any one help find out why is this error being encountered when both the source and target feilds along with their subfields are optional (i.e. with minOccurs=0)?

    ok there seems to be some confusion
    my source structure is like
    <a>
    <b></b>
    <c>
    <1></1>
    </c>
    </a>
    and target structure is like
    <x>
    <y></y>
    <z>
    <9></9>
    </z>
    </x>
    and the mapping is as follows
    a is mapped to x
    a>b is mapped to x>y
    a>c is mapped to x>z
    a>c>1 is mapped to x>z>9
    and both c and z have cardinatlity 0 to unbounded.
    In this case if my source message does not have the element c, its processing leads to the said mapping error.
    Edited by: diptee s on Mar 14, 2010 4:51 PM

  • Is it possible to map the cmp fields of the entity bean with out dictionary

    Dear sirs,
    I have created the EJB project module and WEB Module. Now i have to map the CMP fields of the entity bean to the underlying table. Is it possible to map the cmp fields of the entity bean with out java dictionary? If yes how can we do that.
    I have got some error while mapping an EJB's CMP fields to the table through dictionary. I was actually intended to map 79 fields but it gives an error that more than 64 fields are not allowed while building the dictionary.
    1. Can you tell me what could be the possible reason?
    2. Is it possible to map the cmp fields of the entity bean with out java dictionary? If yes how can we do that.
    Kindly helo me,
    Sudheesh K S

    Hi,
    Sudheesh please check up if the below link helps,there are other ways of writing the persistent.xml for container managed entity bean.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/9b/f695f0c84acf46a4e0b31f69d8a9b7/frameset.htm, probably in the studio you cannot browse through tables not in  the java dictionary,but manually editing it may still solve the problem.
    Also here is another link that specifies the databases supported by J2EE Engine.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/66/a5283eeb47b40be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    The below link shows how to specify the database vendor and datasource
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/e1/67fc3ee241ba28e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Hope you are able to solve the problem.
    Do let us know if you come up with the solution.
    Regards,
    Harish
    Message was edited by: HARISH SUBRAMANIAN

  • Strange Data Mapping Errors after SEM 6 Upgrade. Please assist.

    Hi All, I encountered these sudden Mapping errors after I tried to do Testing in Post Upgrade Sand Box. Here I am trying to to perform Collected Reported Financial Data under Data Collection Method for a particular Company Code 3040. Kindly help me with some quick responses as this is kind of high priority. The errors and the Diagnosis Notes I am unable to follow as I do not where I shall write those Mapping Rules they are referring to. I do not even know if that need to apply any SAP Notes as such. Once again Highly appreciate your quick response and Many Thanks in Advance.
    Regards, BIP
    Input conversion for field Period Value LC has invalid format Message no. UCT8210 Diagnosis The mapping rule for target field Period Value LC contains a move with a selected Input Conversion indicator. Therefore, the system performs an input conversion prior to creating the target data. However, an error in the input conversion occurred while moving the source key figure to the target key figure Period Value LC. This means that the format used for the input conversion is incompatible with the target data. System Response The system will not perform the move. Procedure Examine the mapping rule for field Period Value LC. Either select the Conversion Exit indicator or deselect the Input Conversion indicator. Execute the method again. -
    3040 is incompatible with input format for field /1FB/COMPANY Message no. UCT8258 Diagnosis During execution, the method derives the source selection for source field /1FB/COMPANY from the mapping rule for the target field. 3040 is one of the values that were derived for the source selection. The system requires that this value is in the correct SAP-internal format because the Conversion Exit indicator has been selected in the move operator for field /1FB/COMPANY. However, the value 3040 is incompatible with the SAP-internal format. System Response The system attempts to interpret value 3040 as an external format and convert it to the internal format. If this fails, the system is unable to restrict the source selection using source field /1FB/COMPANY. In this case, the system may read more source data than was originally intended, which can affect performance. Procedure In the log, choose the Source button to display the source selections that are used to read the source data. When this appears, examine values selected for field /1FB/COMPANY. If the correct values were selected, you can ignore this message. To prevent this message from being issued, you can select the indicator in the mapping rule used by source field /1FB/COMPANY. If incorrect values were selected, make sure that the mapping rule used by source field /1FB/COMPANY has been defined correctly. If the mapping rule is correct and value (3040) derived for the source selection does not affect the overall result, you can ignore this message. If the source selection does not contain the value 3040 for field /1FB/COMPANY and, because of this, source data that is supposed to be read is not being read, make sure that the mapping rule has been defined correctly. If the source selection does not contain any value for field /1FB/COMPANY, make an estimation as to how much excess source data is being read and whether this might affect system performance. If you do not expect any performance problems, you can ignore this message. In any event, you have the following alternatives if the mapping rule is defined correctly, but the source selection on field /1FB/COMPANY is unsatisfactory: You can define a source selection for field /1FB/COMPANY in the Customizing settings for the method on the Selection tab page. Then the method uses this source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. You can implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER and use the method INVERT to determine the source selection on field /1FB/COMPANY. Then the method uses the result of the INVERT method for the source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. -
    Cannot derive the source selection from target field Version Message no. UCT8252 Diagnosis Field Version has one of the following roles: Consolidation unit Group currency key Fiscal year Posting period Version To delimit the volume of the source data to be read, the system usually derives the source selection from the target selection of such a field. However, the system cannot derive a source selection from field Version. System Response It is possible that a greater volume of source data is being read than is necessary. This can lead to performance issues. Procedure Check whether a mapping rule is defined for field Version. If a mapping rule is defined, you can disregard this warning message. However, if you discover after method execution that the system did not process a large amount of data, and that system performance was not satisfactory, you may want to examine the source selection by choosing the Source button in the log. If the reason for the disregarded data is that too much source data was read because of the unrestricted selection on the source field (which is linked with target field Versionthrough mapping), choose one of the alternatives below: Change the mapping rule for field Version so that the system can derive a delimiting source selection. Implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER with the method INVERT to delimit the selection for the source field that is linked via mapping to the target field Version. -
    Cannot derive the source selection from target field Group Currency Message no. UCT8252 Diagnosis Field Group Currency has one of the following roles: Consolidation unit Group currency key Fiscal year Posting period Version To delimit the volume of the source data to be read, the system usually derives the source selection from the target selection of such a field. However, the system cannot derive a source selection from field Group Currency. System Response It is possible that a greater volume of source data is being read than is necessary. This can lead to performance issues. Procedure Check whether a mapping rule is defined for field Group Currency. If a mapping rule is defined, you can disregard this warning message. However, if you discover after method execution that the system did not process a large amount of data, and that system performance was not satisfactory, you may want to examine the source selection by choosing the Source button in the log. If the reason for the disregarded data is that too much source data was read because of the unrestricted selection on the source field (which is linked with target field Group Currency through mapping), choose one of the alternatives below: Change the mapping rule for field Group Currency so that the system can derive a delimiting source selection. Implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER with the method INVERT to delimit the selection for the source field that is linked via mapping to the target field Group Currency
    1 is incompatible with input format for field FISCPERIOD Message no. UCT8258 Diagnosis During execution, the method derives the source selection for source field FISCPERIOD from the mapping rule for the target field. 1 is one of the values that were derived for the source selection. The system requires that this value is in the correct SAP-internal format because the Conversion Exit indicator has been selected in the move operator for field FISCPERIOD. However, the value 1 is incompatible with the SAP-internal format. System Response The system attempts to interpret value 1 as an external format and convert it to the internal format. If this fails, the system is unable to restrict the source selection using source field FISCPERIOD. In this case, the system may read more source data than was originally intended, which can affect performance. Procedure In the log, choose the Source button to display the source selections that are used to read the source data. When this appears, examine values selected for field FISCPERIOD. If the correct values were selected, you can ignore this message. To prevent this message from being issued, you can select the indicator in the mapping rule used by source field FISCPERIOD. If incorrect values were selected, make sure that the mapping rule used by source field FISCPERIOD has been defined correctly. If the mapping rule is correct and value (1) derived for the source selection does not affect the overall result, you can ignore this message. If the source selection does not contain the value 1 for field FISCPERIOD and, because of this, source data that is supposed to be read is not being read, make sure that the mapping rule has been defined correctly. If the source selection does not contain any value for field FISCPERIOD, make an estimation as to how much excess source data is being read and whether this might affect system performance. If you do not expect any performance problems, you can ignore this message. In any event, you have the following alternatives if the mapping rule is defined correctly, but the source selection on field FISCPERIOD is unsatisfactory: You can define a source selection for field FISCPERIOD in the Customizing settings for the method on the Selection tab page. Then the method uses this source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. You can implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER and use the method INVERT to determine the source selection on field FISCPERIOD. Then the method uses the result of the INVERT method for the source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule
    Input must be in the format ___,___,__~ Message no. 00088 Diagnosis Your entry does not match the specified input format. System Response The entry in this field was rejected. Procedure The entry must comply with the edit format. The following edit format characters have a special meaning: "_" (underscore) There should be an input character at this point; this should be a number for numeric fields. "." (decimal point) (applies to numeric fields) The decimal point occurs here (setting in the user master record). "," (thousands separator) (applies to numeric fields) This separator occurs (optionally) for more than three figures. Depending on the setting in the user master record, it can be a period or a comma. "V" (applies to numeric fields) The operational sign appears here. If used, it must by at the right margin of the field. The sign is either "-" or " "(space). "~" (tilde) (applies to numeric fields) As of and including this character, leading zeros must also be entered. Otherwise, this character has the same meaning as an underscore. Leading zeros need not be entered on the left of the tilde. They are not output at this position. All other characters have their normal meanings and must be entered in the same position as in the edit format.

    Hi Dan,
    Could you Kiindly advise me where we need to write the Mapping Rules in Consolidation Monitor? All he time the errors refering to Mapping Rules. The only Tab I seen "Mapping" is in Data Basis But as per my Understanding Iwe do not have much to do there as it is system generated Mapping Tab.
    Where we actually go and select/deselct those Input Conversion Indicator/ Conversion exit Indicator.
    Highly appreciate your advise.
    Thanks and Regards,
    BIP

  • Catch mapping error message in BPM Exception branch

    Hi dudes,
    Does anyone know how to catch the mapping runtime error message into a BPM exception branch? I know how to create an exception branch and how to trigger it, but I wonder whether it's possible to pass the mapping error message as shown in SXI_MONITOR (i.e. 'Cannot create target element XXXXX. Values missing in queue context').
    Otherwise, everytime my BPM fails I will have to take the payload and run the mapping test in order to find out the reason of the error.
    Many thanks in advance!
    Paco

    Thanks,
    My problem is not about handling exception in BPM, but getting the mapping error description and then passing it to the exception branch.
    I can see in the workflow log that this info is contained into the Exception container EXCEPTIONS[2] / T100MSG:
    Message Class: SAI_MAPPING
    Message Number: 217
    Message Type: E
    Message Variable: com/sap/xi/tf/_<MM name>
    Message Variable: com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf7.IllegalInstanceExcepti
    Message Variable: on: Cannot create target element /ns1:<path/field>.Message Variable: Values~
    The text in bold is the one I am interested in to be get and mapped into the exception branch.

  • Mapping Error- In IDoc to File scenario

    Hi Experts,
    Got the Mapping error for one interface (IDoc to file). After comparing with successful message found that the field value (TDLINE) is not availbale in first segment (E1EDT10) in idoc for this failed one.
    Mapping is :
    TDLINE -- Exists --- Creatif --- Receiver field(in the file)
    But here due to the the empty value in first segment the message is failed in XI system, next segment values is not trasmitted to the recever end(maping is the same above). To overcome this issue please suggest the suitable mapping design in IR.
    Regards
    Mahesh

    Hi,
    After your CreateIf, use a "IfWithoutElse" by selecting the properties "Keep SUPPRESS Values". To do that, do a right click on IfWithoutElse, choose "Properties".
    With this option, you will keep the fact that you have nothing in the source, and so the target context will have a "SUPPRESS" line.  I have not THE solution, so do your own test.
    If it's not enough, see also about the "mapWithDefault" (but that depends of your real rule).
    Regards.
    Mickael

  • Message Mapping error:  RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation

    Hi,
    Being new to XI, I am struglling to sort out a basic mapping error. Appreciate if you could help out.
    Its an File->XI->R/3 scenario.
    My FCC successfully reads the File and creates an XML. However this XML is not transferred to the target XML structure which is exactly same except the root element name is different at top.
    I tried various forum tips but I still am getting the error.
    ( When I Test the Message mapping in test mode..it seems fine, however if I copy the XML from SXMB_MONI, it then throws the above error)
    I looked at the MM in text mode: below is the extract
    /ns0:MT_REQUEST_TO_SAP/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER=/ns0:MT_REQUEST/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER=
    /ns0:MT_REQUEST_TO_SAP/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER/SOURCE=/ns0:MT_REQUEST/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER/SOURCE=
    /ns0:MT_REQUEST_TO_SAP/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER/DESTINATION=/ns0:MT_REQUEST/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER/DESTINATION=
    /ns0:MT_REQUEST_TO_SAP/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER/MESSAGE_ID=/ns0:MT_REQUEST/REQUEST_DETAILS/MSG_HEADER/MESSAGE_ID=
    As seen the name space in both starts with nS0 and end of each line has '=' sign. Is that ok.
    I have run out of options and dont know , whats the problem. Please help.
    The target and Source XML structures are exactly same as shown below
    MT_REQUEST                                 MT_REQUEST_TO_SAP
       |__MSG_HEADER                            |__MSG_HEADER  
         |__SOURCE                                |__SOURCE
         |__DESTINATION                           |__DESTINATION
         |__MESSAGE_ID                            |__MESSAGE_ID
    And the SXMB_MONI Trace shows the following error
    <Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation:
    Cannot produce target element /ns0:MT_REQUEST_TO_SAP.
    Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd at ..
    Thanks
    Shirin
    Edited by: Shirin K on May 29, 2008 10:29 AM

    Hi Prakasu,
    As structure are exactly same, I have done 1:1 mapping. So all the fields in target structure are mapped, so no field has beeen left.
    In this structure, I do not have any 1:n relation. So 1:1 mapping should be fine.
    Apart from this could teher be any other reason.
    Regards
    Rajiv

  • Message Mapping Error in Text File to XML file Scenario

    Hi Gurus,
    This is Sudheer...I am New to SAP-PI......
    Below link is File to File Scenario(Text File to XML File)...
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/xi/basicFileAdapterContentConversion
    I am facing Message Mapping Error....I am not able to map the fileds...
    Please help me.
    -Sudheer

    Thanks Shabarish & Manisha for your reply....
    Ya I am getting error while I am testing in IR....
    I dont know how to map the fields that shown given below...
           Message Type         ---         Message Type
                 Record                              Employee
                     Header                                 EmployeeID
                         Key                              Name
                         EmpID                          Company
                         Name                            Phone
                         Company                       Prior_Employer
                         Phone                               Company         
                      Detail                                   Location
                          Key
                          Company
                          Location

  • Mapping error in the BPM!!

    Hi Fiends,
    I have a BPM ..where I have the steps defined like this..
    Transform -> send mail..
    In the transformation ..I have a simple mapping program(source & the target structures have got one field)..
    message type structures are like this..
    source& target
    Return key  ---> 1:1
       field1 --->1:1
    mapping is like this :
    Field1--->field1(when field1 is not empty)
    If field1 is empty then -> I am sending some constant to the target ...and in the mapping it is working fine...
    My mail is working perfectly when there is some value in field1..and I am getting a mail..
    and when there is no value in field1..I am getting mapping error.
    do you have any idea..how can I solve this issue..plz help me..
    Thanks..

    Raju,
    Try tracing the "transformation" step in BPM. Check the instance of the message in sxmb_moni and click 'PE' so you will be in 'workflow log' here you could see the data flow of your message inside BPE. Here you can trace were your message got exception. If it is in transformation step then click on 'list tech details' (left top corner) then click on 'show container' button corresponding to that 'transformation step'. Its similar to using trace area in sxmb_moni. here you will be aware of mapping error.
    Hope it will be helpfull.
    Regards,
    Yuva

  • Mapping error in FCC to XML conversion

    hiii friends,
    im donig a simple fcc to xml conversion
    my Sender msg type is like
    TXT_mt
          records                             1.1   
                row                             1.n
                    id                             1
                    Name                       1
                    address                   1
    My receiver msg type like
    Xml_mt
          records                             1.1   
                row                             1.n
                    id                             1
                    Name                       1
                    address                   1
    msg mapping like
    records--->records
    id--->id
    Name-->Name
    address-->address
    **Im getting a mapping error like**
    <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="MAPPING">EXCEPTION_DURING_EXECUTE</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>com/sap/xi/tf/_pepsi_fcc_file_mm_</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2>com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException</SAP:P2>
      <SAP:P3>RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~</SAP:P3>
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>During the application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_pepsi_fcc_file_mm_ a com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException was thrown: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    I ve checked my adapeters they r green.
    Could u tell me the problem here and how to solve it???
    Regards
    Balaji

    Hii Volker,
    I have tried to understand the trace msg,. i got one interesting error message i hope it will tell the exact problem im facing,,,
    <Trace level="1" type="T">RuntimeException during appliction Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_pepsi_fcc_file_mm_</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns:xml_mt/record/row. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram
    My Sender CC  contains the following FCC parameters
    Document Name -
    > txt_mt
    Recordset Name -
    > records
    recordset Structure -
    >  row, *
    row.fieldNames -
    > id, Names,address
    row.fieldSeparator -
    > , (comma)
    row.endSeparator--- >  'nl'
    row.processConfiguration  -
    > FromConfiguration
    my TXT_in.txt contain
    100,balaji,chennai
    200,raj,orissa
    300,charakrat,bangalore
    Regards,
    Balaji
    Edited by: Balaji Pichaimuthu on Jul 1, 2009 3:44 PM

  • MAPPING ERROR...................URGENT

    Hi Experts,
    I have a File to File (FTP) scenario,
    The source structure.....................Mapping.......................................target structure
    PO ...................................................................................PO
    |........Header...1.1.................................................................|.....Header.....1.1
    |........Line........1.unbounded..................................................|....Line...........1.unbounded
    |.........sno.........1.unbounded
    |........Inst...........1.unbounded................................................|.....Inst............1.999
    It caught an Mapping error, when i send a messge with below srtucture
    PO
    |........Header
    |........Line
    |........Line
    |........Line
    Error details:
    RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns1:PO/Inst.
    Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd
    Please suggest to resolve the error.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    In you source structure all fields are with occurance 1 -1 or 1- Unbounded.
    But in source XML, if the filed <Inst> is missing its creating this kind of error. As the decided Source XML structure is not getting matched up.
    Probably you could do one thing here either pass the blank space or any value such as 00 etc to Inst field. That will make this Inst available in source XML structure.
    Or change the occurance of Inst to 0 - Unbounded. This will solve the problem.
    Just for confirmation you could add </Inst> tag in your source XML while testing it in Test Tab of mapping.
    (Make sure to add this tag in proper sequece only)
    Thanks
    Swarup

  • IDOC Serialization(EOIO) using IDOC Adapter throwing Mapping error

    Hello SDN Gurus,
    The scenario I am working on is IDOC(PAYEXT & EUPEXR) --> XI (ABAP Mapping) --> Flat File (IDOC Structure).
    The IDOCS produced in Appl system may be in the following order
    PAYEXT
    PAYEXT
    EUPEXR
    PAYEXT
    PAYEXT
    PAYEXT
    EUPEXR
    I need them to be processed in the same order into flat file.
    The scenario is working good except for the serialization. So I did the following
    Created two entries in IDXQUEUE one for each message type with the same Queue name in XI system.
    Created a new rule for the queue and an associated function module. Used this rule in partner profile for both the message types.  I used the following link to create the above two steps.
    /people/community.user/blog/2006/11/04/how-to-serialize-idoc-xml-messages-fed-into-xi
    The SAP system in based on WAS 6.4.
    I can see the queue name & EOIO in the inbound message header.
    I am getting a mapping error in ABAP program. If I inactivate the queue(in Appl system SAP ECC), I don't get any error.
    Does anybody had this problem earlier? Please advice.
    Thanks
    Srini Vaidyam

    I found an OSS note to resolve my issue. The note number is 1057573.
    Whenever the queue is activated, the sender system will not send the <TABNAM> field value in EDI_DC40 structure. This note addresses this problem.
    I found out this by comparing the results from SXI_MAPPING_TEST individually for the message that failed after queue is activated and the message that was successful if the queue is inactivated.
    Only thing I noticed now is even if you selected the radio button "Trasfer Immediately" in Partner profile of Appl. system, the messages are not sent. They are getting collected. So we need to manually push them out using WE14.
    This forum Rocks.
    Thanks. 
    Srini Vaidyam

  • Soap response mapping error

    hi
    i got payload of response from webservice as below;
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Request Message Mapping
      -->
    - <m:requestResponse xmlns:m="http://tempuri.org/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
      <result xsi:type="xsd:string">20060911tt11</result>
      </m:requestResponse>
    when i test mapping with above contents in mapping test tab, i got mapping error as blow;
    16:03:59 Start of test
    Cannot produce target element /ns1:Rnumber_MT/rnum. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd Cannot produce target element /ns1:Rnumber_MT/rnum. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd
    16:03:59 End of test
    source side in MM_response, comming from wsdl for MT.
    result          xsd:string
    target side in MM_response, i created DT, MT.
    Rnumber_MT
             |__
                 rnum  xsd:string
    i sent data to webservice succesfully, and i can see return value as well, but mapping error.
    please guide me.
    thanks in advance
    venjamin

    hi
    in response procedure;
    my scenario abap proxy 2 soap sync
    1. response from webserivce --> r/3
      there is no DT, MT due to coming from wsdl.
      only i can see result xsd:string
    2. data type for r/3
       Rnumber_DT
           rnum xsd:string
       message type Rnumber_MT
       Rnumber_MT
           |_
               rnum  xsd:string     
    3. mapping for response
       1. source (webservice)
         external message : requestResponse
         result xsd:string
       2. target  (r/3)
       Rnumber_MT
           |_
               rnum  xsd:string  
       i did map ,,, result ---> rnum..
      here is payload for response from webservice....
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!-- Request Message Mapping
    -->
    - <m:requestResponse xmlns:m="http://tempuri.org/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <result xsi:type="xsd:string">20060911tt11</result>
    </m:requestResponse>
    please help me
    thanks in advance
    venjamin

  • XI Flat File to JDBC Mapping Error

    Hi,
    I have been trying to insert some records from a flat file into a sybase database using the FILE adapter (with file content conversion) as a sender and the JDBC adapter as a reciever, but I keep getting mapping errors like:
    RuntimeException during appliction Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_mm_hh_file__hh_sybase_nombres_</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns0:mt_hh_sybase_nombres/STATEMENTNAME. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.start
    I have read through some blogs and I still can't figure out what is wrong.
    Flat pipe separated file:
    Hans|Robert|Hahn|Gallegos
    Karina|Maria|Cordoba|Gutierrez
    Datatype for this file looks like this:
       Record                         1
          Row                          1...Unbounded
             Nombre                  1
             SegundoNombre     1
             ApPaterno              1
             ApMaterno             1
    Because the FILE adapter uses Content conversion, the file translates to:
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
      <ns:hh_test xmlns:ns="http://me.com">
      <Record>
         <Row>
          <Nombre>Hans</Nombre>
            <SegundoNombre>Robert</SegundoNombre>
            <ApPaterno>Hahn</ApPaterno>
            <ApMaterno>Gallegos</ApMaterno>
         </Row>
         <Row>
           <Nombre>Karina</Nombre>
           <SegundoNombre>Maria</SegundoNombre>
           <ApPaterno>Cordoba</ApPaterno>
           <ApMaterno>Gutierrez</ApMaterno>
         </Row>
        </Record>
      </ns:hh_test>
    My database table looks like this:
    Nombres
    ApPaterno
    ApMaterno
    Datatype for this table looks like this:
    STATEMENTNAME    1..Unbounded
      nombres                  1
        action                    optional
        TABLE                  1
        access                  1
          Nombres             1
          ApPaterno           1
          ApMaterno           1
    MAPPINGS as follows:
    Record ------> no mapping
    Row ------> STATEMENTNAME
    Constant ------> action
    Constant ------> TABLE
    Nombre + SegundoNombre ------> Nombres
    ApPaterno ----> ApPaterno
    ApMaterno ----> ApMaterno
    How do I do the mapping ? I've been through a lot of blogs and threads but I haven't found an example like this, a flat pipe separeted multiline file with records to be inserted in a database.
    Message was edited by:
            Hans Hahn

    Hans,
    The error shows you have an error in mapping. Also you have mapped constant for ACTION and TABLE. Here you have to hardcode the value INSERT or UPDATE etc for ACTION and the name of the table for TABLE.
    Check this weblog where he has mentioned everything what you are looking for:
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2005/06/01/file-to-jdbc-adapter-using-sap-xi-30
    Also once when you are done with mapping try to execute it in the test tab of mapping editor.
    ---Satish

  • Mapping error while downloading the condition records (ECC to CRM)

    Hello Experts,
    We were downloading the condition records from ECC to CRM system (Production), but due to Mapping error, it was unsuccessful, i wonder what's going wrong there.
    When i see in SMQ2 (CRM Inbound Queue), an queue got stucked there, i.e, R3AD_ZDNL_COND_A930 having SYSFAIL status.
    While debugging the queue, I have found that the queue got stuck because of u2018Mapping Erroru2019.
    I found inside, Standard code reads the record from table /SAPCND/T681 (Condition Table Structure) for KAPPL = 'CRM', KVEWE = 'PR', KOTABNR = 'CUS930' and AS4LOCAL = u2018Au2019 for which the value of VAKEY_OFFSET is maintained as 0.
    If system finds the value of VAKEY_OFFSET is Zero(0) then it will change the download type from D (Delta) to M (Mapping Error) and raise the error & block the Inbound Queue in CRM.
    I checked in SMW01alsofor getting some more knowledge about that queue, here the error description:
    Structure information for table CNCCRMPRCUS930 not available (Message class: CND_MAP)
    Error when carrying out delta download (Message class: CND_MAP)
    I am a technical guy and dont have much idea in CRM Middleware.
    I welcome your valuable thoughts and will award full points.
    Regards,
    Jeo

    Hi,
    As you mentioned i checked for the followings:
    >>In Maintain field catalog:
    I found only 2-3 fields are maintained here, when i compared with A930 (A930 in ECC system).
    >>Create condition tables:
    I checked it for CUS930, i found the same but condition table structure name like CNCCRMPRCUS930 are missing. Is that important? Because i see in SMW01, same error is coming over there : Structure information for table CNCCRMPRCUS930 not available .
    Please suggest me, now what i need to do?
    Regards,
    Jeo
    Edited by: Jeo Denson on Dec 1, 2011 4:11 PM

Maybe you are looking for