Mapping - Filtering criteria

Hi Friends,
In my source structure i have one of the field called "Purchase ID". I need to map this field to target based on one criteria as follows :
Only the following Purchase ID's should be considered from source xml.
Purchase ID
100
101
Requriment :
If there is any  other values for Purchase ID other than (100 ,101) . Those  set of records  need to be dicarded . It should not go to target remaning other valid records will have to go to target.
For eg :
We have 100 records out ofwhich 50 records are not having the values either 100 or 101 hence this records should not go to
Target.
Kindly guide me.

My target structure
  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:MT_ProdCatalog_Simplexity xmlns:ns0="http://palm.com/PALMPRODCATALOG/Simplexity"><STATEMENT_STORE_SIMPLEXITY_FEED><TABLENAME ACTION="UPDATE_INSERT"><TABLE>STORE_SIMPLEXITY_FEED</TABLE><ACCESS><CARRIER_DESC></CARRIER_DESC><MANUFACTURER_NAME></MANUFACTURER_NAME><Manufacturer_Code></Manufacturer_Code><*PURCHASEID*>101</*PURCHASEID*><EQUIPMENT_NAME></EQUIPMENT_NAME><EQUIPMENT_TYPE></EQUIPMENT_TYPE><EQUIPMENT_SHORT_DESC></EQUIPMENT_SHORT_DESC><EQUIPMENT_LONG_DESC></EQUIPMENT_LONG_DESC><SUG_RETAIL_PRICE></SUG_RETAIL_PRICE><DISPLAY_PRICE></DISPLAY_PRICE><EQUIPMENT_PRICE></EQUIPMENT_PRICE><NUMERIC_COST></NUMERIC_COST><REBATE_AMOUNT></REBATE_AMOUNT><PRICE_AFTER_REBATE></PRICE_AFTER_REBATE><REBATE_DESC></REBATE_DESC><EQUIPMENT_IMAGEFILE_SMALL></EQUIPMENT_IMAGEFILE_SMALL><EQUIPMENT_IMAGEFILE_MEDIUM></EQUIPMENT_IMAGEFILE_MEDIUM><EQUIPMENT_IMAGEFILE_LARGE></EQUIPMENT_IMAGEFILE_LARGE><MANUFACTURER_LOGO></MANUFACTURER_LOGO><PRODUCT_LINK></PRODUCT_LINK><UPC></UPC><COMPATIBLE_ACCESSORIES_PAGEURL></COMPATIBLE_ACCESSORIES_PAGEURL><IS_BELOW_IMAP></IS_BELOW_IMAP></ACCESS></TABLENAME></STATEMENT_STORE_SIMPLEXITY_FEED><STATEMENT_STORE_FEED_REFRESH_DATE><TABLENAME ACTION="UPDATE"><TABLE>STORE_FEED_REFRESH_DATE</TABLE><ACCESS><REFRESH_FEED>YES</REFRESH_FEED><REFRESH_CACHE>YES</REFRESH_CACHE><EXTRACT_DATE>2010/10/06</EXTRACT_DATE><FEED_TYPE>SFeed</FEED_TYPE></ACCESS></TABLENAME></STATEMENT_STORE_FEED_REFRESH_DATE></ns0:MT_ProdCatalog_Simplexity>

Similar Messages

  • Scheduled CUIC Reports losing filtering criteria.

    CUIC 10.01
    ICM 9.0
    We have a reoccurring issue where some scheduled reports fail with this message:
    "SCHEDULED REPORT EXECUTION FAILED - DATA-PROCESSING-CENTER-ERROR"
    When I access the report, the filtering criteria is missing.  Once I define the criteria and save the report, it works again.  This has happened to a few different scheduled reports and is not limited to one report type/definition.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks!

    here you go: 
    https://software.cisco.com/download/special/release.html?config=7743258e122971fd6cfad709bbc2ce5a

  • Filtering criteria using an Exit variable

    Hi,
    I have a requirement as follows:
    There are 2 info objects for Start& End Periods of project.
    There is another Keyfigure(number of months) which is populated by calculating the difference of Start & End periods.
    Now, the filtering criteria would be Start period, End period and number of months.
    When the user enters the Start and End periods of the project and also the number of months, the system shoudl display all the projects matching the above filtering criteria.
    Eg:
    Project1:  Start period : 01.2009
                   End period :  06.2009
                   Number of months : 6
    Project2:  Start period : 02.2009
                   End period :  04.2009
                   Number of months : 3
    Project3:  Start period : 03.2009
                   End period :  05.2009
                   Number of months : 3
    Project4:  Start period : 05.2009
                   End period :  07.2009
                   Number of months : 3
    Project5:  Start period : 05.2009
                   End period :  09.2009
                   Number of months : 5
    Now if the user enters the following the filtering criteria:
    Start period: 01.2009
    End period:  12.2009
    Number of Months : 3,
    the system should display only project2,project3,project4.
    Any thoughts on how to achieve this using an Exit variable? Because the variables Start and End periods are created on 2 seperate info objects.
    Thanks
    Shyam

    Hi,
    I think you should create the two variable..
    One for start period where user puts the start period:- 01/2009 to 01/2009
    Also in the end period user can select the :- 01/2009 to 012/2009.
    in exit variable you can take the user input and add the high value for strat period similar to user input..
    and in the end period user puts the end month and in exit u need to put the start period in low value.
    Hope this helps..
    in this caase, u will get the
    start period value    01/2009 to 01/2009
    End Period Value   01/2009  to 12/2009.
    Regards
    Gopal

  • Filtering criteria in User selection screen

    Hi experts,
    Is there any ways to display values in the selection screen based on the above criteria that user selected? For example, the selection screen has 3 selection tabs. The first tab is to choose region (A,B or C). When user selects region A, the second criteria shows only the factories that located in region a, not all of the factories. Once user select a factory, the thrid tab shows only the manager names that works in that factory.
    I'm new in this area so please provide me an instruction steps by steps.
    Thanks so much,
    Phant

    Do you have any mapping maintained in any InfoObject for all these characteristics you mentioned, or you are trying to pull out this information based on the trascational data from the cube.
    There is one option in the query designer. Go to Advance tab of the characteristic and under second option "Filter vale for selection during query execution", select Characteristic Relationships.
    - Danny

  • Geting select option value on the basis of filtering criteria

    Hi
    I have a selection parameter field is PRPS-WERKS. when user will go for f4 help, the value should come as filtered on the basis of the condition : select the respective WBS ELEMENT (PRPS- PSPNR) and select the respective PR LINE item. (The relation is PRPS-PSPNR=EBKN-PS_PSP_PNR and EBKN-BANFN = EBAN-BANFN and EBKN-BNFPO = EBAN-BNFPO).now the value iof WERKS is not comming from the database table PRPS itself. how to manage this thing?

    Hi,
      Refer the link select option in smartforms and read what i suggested..
    Regards,
    Dhina..

  • Mapping tables with no primary key defined

    Hi!
    I was just wondering if it's possible to map a table with no primary key? The reason why is that I have a logging table that I want to access, which is built very simple and the only useful filtering criteria that I'll be using there is a date column.
    Regards,
    Bjorn Boe

    TopLink requires that an object have a primary key to determine identity, perform caching, and database updates and deletes. It is best to define a primary key in all your objects; a sequence number can be used if the object has no natural primary key. The primary key does not have to be defined on the database, as long as a set of fields in the table are unique you can define them to be the primary key in your TopLink descriptor.
    If your table truly has no primary key, nor unique set of fields, it is still possible to map the table with some restrictions. If you disable caching, and mark the object as read-only, and never update or delete the object, you can map it for read-only purposes.
    You will need to do the following:
    - Set any field as the primary key to avoid the validation warning.
    - Set the cache type to NoIdentityMap.
    - Set the descriptor to be read-only.

  • How to give filters from Year level to day level in dashboard?

    Hi all,
    I have some 7 to 10 components and i want the filter from Year level to day (Year,Quarter,Month, Week and Day) with "All" option as default from Quarter to Day level.
    As default Only current year should be selected for which my components should display 4 quarters data
    and when any quarter is selected my components should display 3 respective months data
    then when particular month is selected then my components should display 4 weeks data
    when week is selected the 7 days data
    and last when day is selected only that days data should be displayed.
    All the data will be coming from Database, to get data we need to build query & prompts and map accordingly
    And those prompts should be mapped to these filters and work dynamically.
    If anyone know how to implement this please let me know.
    Regards
    Nithesh M R

    Hi,
    As you said try to prompts for all the above mentioned filtering criteria, then use the combo box as a drop down filter, In first combo box take year list. From second combo box take the data in Tree view using filtered rows insertion type. Below given link can give you a idea how to pass the subsequent values to the next cell.
    Instead of continent & country & ..... you can take quarter, month, week and so on, so your combo box fills the data automatically.
    Filtering Through Combo Box
    --SumanT

  • Unused BOM components not getting filtered

    I have written a Query for BOM, which is having ECM active.  Earlier there were 14 components.
    3 components have been removed. But If I execute my Query--it is getting all the 14 components
    instead of 11.
    In CS03--If I execute,
    with both Valid from and Valid to date as today--Defaulted--Then 11 components are displayed.-OK
    If I keep Valid from Only--Then 11 are displayed.--Ok
    If I remove both Valid from and Valid to date--Then 14 are displayed.-Ok
    If I keep valid to date --Then it is displaying all the 14 components.
    That means Valid from is acting a s filter.
    If I use the same Valid from--(Tried all the Valid From fields in STPO) in my Query--It is not taking.
    The strange thing this, If we give that Particular date (On which the component is changed)--Then it is
    taking and showing the output in the query.
    The thing I need here is --The same functionality (Filtering criteria) has to be put into my Query.
    P.S: Even Standard reports  like CS11/CS12/CS13 are not filtering, in the way--CS02/CS03 are doing.
    Any suggestions would be highly appreciable. Thanks in advance.
    Wherever we see in the standard reports--The Valid to is coming from structures.

    Hello,
    You can try with CS11/CS12 where select Change No. and valid from date.
    If you change a Material BOM  with a change number then a new entry is created in the database (tables STPO, STAS).
    Best Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Filter criteria in ALV report not working

    Hi,
    In ALV report , when i click on filter button , it does not filter the report according to the filtered criteria. this happens in the cases where the selection criteria is a lengthy field. when i debug after the filter criteria it goes into standard function.
    i am using REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY
    is there any way in which i can correct this?
    thanks,
    Amit
    null

    chk this useful thread
    Re: ALV problem (with filter use)

  • How to add into dynamic selection criteria (FBL1N) - custom field from LFB1

    Hello all,
    i have following problem. I added new customer field into table LFB1 (Z* field). And now i need to use this field as dynamic selection criteria in transaction FBL1N. I enhanced selection view for logical database KDF - i have created new customer view and I added my new field from LFB1. It is OK, i see this field in dynamic selection criteria in FBL1N but if i try to select according that Z* field, short dump occured.  
    open cursor with hold LC_KRED for select (VF_KRED_FIELDS)
            from <b>VF_KRED</b>
              where LIFNR in KD_LIFNR
              and   BUKRS in KD_BUKRS
              and   LAND1 in KD_LAND1
              and   KONZS in KD_KONZS
              and   VBUND in KD_VBUND
              and   AKONT in KD_AKONT
              and   BUSAB in KD_BUSAB
              and (VF_KRED_WHERE)
    Problem is in VF_KRED - this is database view (LFA1 joins LFB1). This view has no Z* fields and therefore it cannot be use in statement above -> dump.
    Is needed repature of standard - enhancement of view VF_KRED?
    Thank you very much.

    Hi guys,
    thanks so far. I managed to show prompts in the report. But still my problem is nor 100% solved
    I would like t achieve that the filtered criteria in the report title is separated through a comma like in the report filter summary - e.g.: {001, 002, 003, 004} followed by just 1chart/table that is including the whole information.
    When I however just drag a variable into the report it automatically created different sections, right? Like ........ table, chart, whatever... .......table chart whatever........
    Regards

  • Strange Scenario Criteria bug

    Hi Experts,
    I have come accross a weird bug when using a bizpackage with many bizsteps vs using a bizpackage with only one bizstep.
    If I have a bizpackage with 4 bizsteps, all filtering criteria defined correctly & then add the document in B1 that should trigger the first bizstep, I see it gets filtered with the message "No scenario subscribes to this message"
    However, if I then create a bizpackage with just one bizstep (the first bizstep from above, no changes whatsoever) define its filtering criteria in exactly the same way as above & then add the document in B1 that triggers the bizstep, it works perfectly!
    My only explanation is that for some reason having the other bizsteps all the in the same bizpackage is affecting the filtering? I can't find anything indicating this, and it is incredibly frustrating to debug as everything looks fine! If I check the message that gets filtered, its selection criteria are correct & match the filtering criteria for the bizstep!
    Thanks for any ideas or help.. I can run them all as seperate bizpackages but doesn't it kind of defeat the whole idea of a bizpackage? Plus I will now have 8 packages per database instead of just 2.
    Regards,
    njmog

    Hey Gordon,
    Sure:
    Step1: Journal Entry created by a payment in System1 sends a JE to System2
    Filters:
    Between account 123456 and account 234567
    OriginalJournal = 'ttReceipt'
    Debit is greater than 0
    TransactionCode is blank
    Step2: Journal Entry added by step one in System2 sends a JE to System1
    Filters
    Between account 123456 and 234567
    OriginalJournal = 'ttJournalEntry'
    Debit = 0.000000
    TransactionCode = 'B1i'
    Step3: User adds a manual JE in System1 and this is sent to System2
    Filters:
    Between account 123456 and 234567
    OriginalJournal = 'ttJournalEntry'
    TransactionCode is blank
    Debit = 0.000000
    Step4: JE added in step2 ro system1 send a new JE to system2
    Filters
    Between account 123456 and 234567
    OriginalJournal = 'ttJournalEntry'
    TransactionCode = 'B1i'
    Debit = 0.000000
    It's a really specific business case so I know it won't make much sense from an outside point of view. What I don't understand is how step1 when followed by 2-4 will not be triggered, but step1 in a package on its own works fine!
    Thanks,
    njmog

  • MI 7.0 T51  when sync data not filtered

    Hi Experts,
    we have a synbo t51 in mi 7.0 and when we sync with the middelware whe got all the data of the syncbo , not filter by the user of the mobile client who perform the sync?
    has somebody this problem?
    Thanks in advanced.
    Some help..some point....

    Hi,
    Peform this and set a user based filter criteria on syncBO.
    1. Go to transaction merep_sbuilder.
    2. Give the syncBO name and click on Environment and click on filtering criteria.
    3. And then set a filtering criteria for the header field "user" as "ME-SYNC_USER".
       It should look like this:
       FieldName: Userbased Field in header
       Option: EQ
       Value: ME-SYNC_USER.
    4. Enable the syncbo and enable the filter.
    5. Then perform the sync and check if you are getting data only for the sync user.
    But for setting this filtering criteria, your T51 syncbo's header should have a field called "USER" and this value should be filled from the backend. Only then when you sync this filtering of data based on user will happen.
    Hope this helps.
    Best Regards,
    Siva.

  • Power Map filter option missing

    I have an end user who is more of a power user in the company.  They're using Power
    Maps add-in for excel and are expecting this
    filter option but its currently not displayed. I have run all MS updates after the add-in was installed as well as a restart to the system. 
    I have also found other articles about manually updating office but
    those options aren't available in our version of office (pro plus x64 15.0.4675.1000).  The registry keys are not even there. 
    I deployed our MS office via GPO startup script and MSI file. 
    Has anyone run into this or have even a hint as to what may be wrong? 

    Hi k4rizma858,
    According to your description, you said"I deployed our MS office via GPO startup script and MSI file. ", it seems you’re using Microsoft Office 2013. I regret to tell you, Office 2013 doesn’t support the filter function of Power Map,
    and Power Map is an unsupported add-in in Office 2013. Please read this content:
    https://support.office.com/en-in/article/Power-Map-for-Excel-82d65bd7-70c9-48a3-8356-6b0e82472d74
    Microsoft updates to Excel Power Map with two big features, Power Map Filtering and Custom Maps in September 2014, and the features of Power Map are only enhanced for Office 365. You can get these messages from these links:
    http://blogs.office.com/2014/09/09/excel-power-map-september-update/
    http://microsoft-news.com/microsoft-updates-excel-power-map-with-power-map-filtering-and-custom-maps/
    Thus, if you really need to use the filter function of a map. You can use the Office 365 to fulfill your needs or you can try to use Bing Maps in Office 2013.
    Hope it’s helpful.

  • Junk mail filtering problem

    My Mail v2.1 (752/752.2) has learned, and presumably is still learning on an ever-ongoing basis, what is Junk and what is not Junk mail and it seems to be pretty accurate.
    However, it always treats two specific senders, from which I receive emails fairly regularly, as Junk no matter how many times I click the Not Junk button to tell Mail that they are not junk.
    Why does it persist in failing to learn these two specific sender addresses and how can I "force" it to learn without dumping the whole Junk filtering criteria and starting again?
    Thanks.

    Ok, here goes ...
    added to the Window > Previous Recipients - Yes, both are there.
    Sender of message is in my Previous Recipients is checked - No, it asn't but it is now!
    Have you made any changes to the junk filter in Preferences > Junk Mail > Advanced? - Not knowingly. The logic is: If All: Sender is not in my previous Recipients > Sender is not in my addresss book > Message is Junk mail then Move message to Junk.
    Go to Preferences > Junk Mail, disable junk mail filtering, then enable it again. - Done.
    Choose either Training or Automatic mode - Automatic selected.
    lick Advanced to see how the junk filter rule is defined now - The logic now is: If All: Sender is not in my previous Recipients > Sender is not in my addresss book > Message is Junk mail then Move message to Junk which looks pretty much the same to me except for the order, but that shouln't matter should it?
    but don’t touch anything there - I wouldn't dare! :-))
    Thanks, I'll report back when I receive any new emails from them. As one of them is news alerts from Lynchburg, Virginia there will peoably be a few after this afternoon's (UK time) news of today's shootings.

  • Combined Query Output as Filter Criteria

    Post Author: imzdo1
    CA Forum: WebIntelligence Reporting
    I have the need to run a combined query to produce a list of document numbers (I have that query working) and then use the output from that query as the filter criteria in an expanded query in the same Universe.  The output from the first query is 6500 document numbers so it would be very time consuming to cut and paste these into a filter 15 or 20 at a time and then pasting the result of the 300 queries needed to get one report.
    I have both reports built, but can not figure out how to link the first report output to the filtering criteria on the second report.  I am using Webi, not full client version.
    Is is possible and if so how?

    Post Author: RobotSlave
    CA Forum: WebIntelligence Reporting
    Hello imzdo1, what type of datasource? the following applies to SQL:
    sounds like you need to create a temporary table in your SQL stored procedure, like so:
    CREATE TABLE #TempDocumentNumbers
    documentNumber int,
    documentName Varchar(20)
    or however many columns you need, then insert into the temporary table using your existing query like so:
    INSERT INTO #TempDocumentNumbers
    SELECT (whatever your select statement is)
    just remember that you will need to have coresponding columns in your temporary table for each column your select statement returns, once you have the values stored in your temporary table you can join on it just like you would on any other table in the database,
    I like to explicitly drop temp tables at the end of my query like so:
    DROP TABLE #TempDocumentNumbers

Maybe you are looking for