Mapping issue in idoc to JDBC scenario
mapping issue in idoc to JDBC scenario
source structure
E1KNB1M
BUKRS = 1000
E1KNB1M
BUKRS= 9000
E1KNB1M
BUKRS= 2000
THE NODE E1KNB1M is repeated many times and the field BUKRS is also repeated with E1KNB1M as above
TARGET field : ISFRANCHISE
if any where value of BUKRS =9000 we have to pass Y to the target filed, else N
if BUKRS = 9000 THEN ISFRANCHISE= Y
ELSE
ISFRANCHISE=N
I've done the mapping as below
BUKRS = 9000--> IF THEN Y ELSE N--
> ISFRANCHISE
BUT everry time the target value is N only
pl suggest
rgds
mojib
mapped like this
BUKRS--->SORT---->
EQUALS --------IF---THEN Y
9000------------------------> ----------------->ISFRANCHISE
ELSE N
context of BUKRS set to parent node
its worked
thanks to all for valuable suggestions
rgds
mojib
Similar Messages
-
Message mapping issue in idoc to jdbc scenario
We have a scenario of idoc->XI-JDBC
the below given segment may get repeated , as shown below ,
E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
QUALF---003
IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
QUALF---003
IDTNR---20500000000034(EAN No)
Reqd mapping
if QUALF=003
THEN IDTNR----->Bar_code_Number_EAN
Now IDTNR has to be mapped with Bar_code_Number_EAN for the segment which comes last
Pl suggest how to map using graphical mapping for the above scenario.Hi Raj ,
The current mapping works fine if the parent segment E1EDP01 is only one but if that gets repeated then the last value of IDTNR is getting populated in the target side, very clearly i m giving the source and target structure and the mapping done using the UDF
Source structure
E1EDP01
E1EDP19[1]--idoc segment
QUALF---002
IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
QUALF---003
IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
QUALF---003
IDTNR---20500000000030(EAN No)
E1EDP01
E1EDP19[1]--idoc segment
QUALF---002
IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
QUALF---003
IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
QUALF---003
IDTNR---20500000000031(EAN No)
E1EDP01
E1EDP19[1]--idoc segment
QUALF---002
IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
QUALF---003
IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
QUALF---003
IDTNR---20500000000032(EAN No)
Target mapping
if QUALF=002
THEN IDTNR--->Article_No this is the direct mapping so , no issues
if QUALF=003
THEN IDTNR----->Bar_code_Number_EAN, now this IDTNR should get repeated every time the segment E1EDP01 gets repeated , currently only the last value form all the IDTNR is coming to the target side.
The current mapping works fine if the parent segment E1EDP01 is only one
Target structure
Access1
IDTNR--> Bar_code_Number_EAN( value is 20500000000030)
Access2
IDTNR--> Bar_code_Number_EAN( value is 20500000000031)
Access3
IDTNR--> Bar_code_Number_EAN( value is 20500000000032)
Current mapping
If QUALF = 003
Then QUALF ---->
mapBarCodeEAN---->Bar_code_Num_EAN
If QUALF = 003
Then IDTNR ---->
Context of QUALF is set to E1EDP01
Context of IDTNR is set to E1EDP01
thanks for your personalised help
rgds
mojib
Edited by: mohammad mojib ur rahman on Apr 9, 2010 1:30 PM -
Mapping Issue for IDoc to JDBC interface
Hi All,
I am having problem in implementing logic in IDoc to JDBC interface where I have to filter out E1WBB07-KSCHL = VKP0.
Source IDoc structure is like ->
E1WBB01(occ 0 -1000)
|-> E1WBB03 (occ 0-100)
|-> E1WBB07(occ 0-1000)
|-> KSCHL
DATAB
DATBI
Now, For each KSCHL = VKA0 there should be a duplicate VKP0 record. From these 2 records only the VKA0 should get processed and VKP0 ignored.
Duplicates for VKP0 and VKA0 can be identified by identical DATAB and DATBI.
Suppose, in one E1WBB03 segment,there are 4 E1WBB07 segment having following values.
1: KSCHL=VKP0, DATAB=20102011, DATBI=25102011
2: KSCHL=VKP0, DATAB=26102011, DATBI=30102011
3: KSCHL=VKA0, DATAB=26102011, DATBI=30102011
4: KSCHL=VKP0, DATAB=01112011, DATBI=31129999
2 & 3 are duplicates. From these, 2 should get dropped.
As a result only 1, 3 and 4 should get processed.
How can I proceed with this..?...I have tried some work around but not able to do it successfully. Is a UDF required to compare DATAB and DATBI. If yes how it can be written.?
Thnx in advance,
Praveen.chk below mapping:
change the context of DATAB, DATAB1 and KSCHL to E1WBB03 (right click-> context) in all the mappings shown below
1)
DATAB
------------concat-----sort----splibyvalue(value change)-----collapse context---TargetNode
DATBI
2)
DATAB
------------concat-----sortbykey \
DATBI / \
KSCHL------------/ \
----------------------------------------FormatByExample----sort-----UDF1----Target KSCHL
DATAB /
----concat---sort--splibyvalue(value change)-
DATBI
3)
DATAB
---concat ( ; )-----sort-splibyvalue(value change)---collapse context--splitbyvalue (each value)--UDF2---TargetDATAB
DATBI
4)
DATAB
------------concat ( ; )-----sort----splibyvalue(value change)-----collapse context--splitbyvalue (each value)--UDF3---TargetDATABI
DATBI
UDF1: execution type : all values of a context...input: var1
int a=var1.length;
int count=0;
if(a>=2)
for(int i=0;i<a;i++)
if(var1<i>.equals("VKA0"))
count= count+1;
else
result.addValue(var1[0]);
if(count>1)
for(int i=0;i<count;i++)
result.addValue("VKA0");
UDF2:execution type: single value...input: var1
String [] temp= var1.split(";");
return temp[0];
UDF3: execution type: single value...input: var1
String [] temp= var1.split(";");
return temp[1]; -
PI : Idoc to JDBC scenario : repeating segments mapping issue
Experts
Please help.
Question reg. mapping for ECC idoc to JDBC scenario.
I am using the ORDRSP idoc which has multiple segments as below.
IDOC -> multiple E1EDK14 segments with 2 fields (QUALF and ORGID)
Depending on the value of the QUALF field i need to populate the column in my target structure.
QUALF 001 => Colmn a
QUALF 002 => Colmn b
For now my graphical mapping is very simple - QUALF => column a (done just to find out how PI mapping works)
What happens in my case, is the PI Payload shows all the E1EDK14 segments however only the value 006 present in the first occurence goes into the target column.
How do I repeat a mapping between QUALF and target col. for multiple occurences of the same segment?
Please can you guide me reg. use of context, loop over segment, UDF = which will be the best solution to achieve this?Hi
My mapping is as below. I will take an example of a sales order that has 2 line items 00010, 00020. The payload is as follows
I see this payload in the SXMB_MONI transaction => Receiver grouping => Payloads
- <ZORDRES>
- <IDOC BEGIN="1">
+ <EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK01 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK14 SEGMENT="1">
<QUALF>006</QUALF>
<ORGID>01</ORGID>
</E1EDK14>
+ <E1EDK14 SEGMENT="1">
<QUALF>007</QUALF>
<ORGID>01</ORGID>
</E1EDK14>+ <E1EDK03 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK03 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK03 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK03 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDKA1 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDKA1 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDKA1 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDKA1 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDKA1 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK02 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK02 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK17 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK18 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK18 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDP01 SEGMENT="1">
<POSEX>000010</POSEX>
+ <E1EDP01 SEGMENT="1">
<POSEX>000020</POSEX>
</E1EDP01>+ <E1EDS01 SEGMENT="1">
<SUMID>001</SUMID>
<SUMME>2</SUMME>
</E1EDS01>
+ <E1EDS01 SEGMENT="1">
<SUMID>002</SUMID>
<SUMME>1100.00</SUMME>
<SUNIT>GBP</SUNIT>
</E1EDS01>
</IDOC>
</ZORDRES>
There are 2 problems. First one which I discovered after posting the query. I can see only the line item 10 in the query that gets contructed in PI to insert the data into the target jdbc table. Please see jdbc receiver communication channel log below
If you see above there are 2 E1EDP01 segments for line 00010, 00020.
INSERT INTO tblOItem (IDocDate, IDocTime, SalesOrderNo, ItemNo, Plant, ItemCategory, UnitSellPrice, QuantityOrdered, QuantityAllocated, ScheduledDeliveryDate) VALUES (20111206, 135530, 0015002085, 000010, 0086, ZTAN, 0.00, 1.000, 1.000, 20111201)
My source and target mappings are as below.
ZSALORD
IDOC
BEGIN
E1EDK01
E1EDP01
POSEX =============> SalOrdItm table column itemno
My target side structure (idoc to jdbc scenario is as follows)
I have mapped the E1EDP01 to Statement - I thought this will build one query per line item (per occurence of E1EDP01) but this is not working.
MT_OITEM
Statement
dbtablename ============> SalOrdItm
action =================> Insert
table
access
Itemno (this is one of the columns from the table)
The occurence of E1EDP01 is 0..9999999 while the occurence of Statement node is 1...unbounded.
Please is there any email address where I can send you screen shots if the above is not clear.
I need to get this interface delivered as soon as possible but am STUCK.
Edited by: gary jojo on Dec 6, 2011 3:06 PM -
Storage Issue in Database while executing Idoc to Jdbc scenario
Hi,
I am testing an Idoc to JDBC scenario. The scenario executes correctly, but the number of records getting stored in the database are not equalling the data present in the Idoc.
Eg: If the Idoc has data for around 75000 records to be saved, only around 50000 records are getting saved in JDBC SQl server database.
Please let me know what could be the issue and how to resolve it.
Regards
Kiran.Check the output XML in XI;ie, the output of your mapping. Does it have the same number of records as the Idoc? if no the issue is in the mapping.
Regards
Bhavesh -
Very strange error : IDOC to jdbc scenario
Hi
I am getting a very strange error when I see the log for the idoc to jdbc scenario that I am building.
The mapping test shows the header record and line item record properly in the mapping result.
insert, access nodes, fields with access nodes are all formed correctly.
However the communication channel log shows below error.
Could not execute statement for table/stored proc. "tblTestItem" (structure "Item") due to com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: Incorrect syntax near ')'.
JDBC Message processing failed, due to Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'tblTestItem' (structure 'Item'): com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: Incorrect syntax near ')'.
The message status was set to WAIT.
The query that I see in the log is :INSERT INTO tblTestItem () VALUES ()
However mapping tool shows that all nodes are correctly formed.
Please assist.Hi
I am still getting this issue even after the below steps so kind of stuck - actually very much stuck.
1. Restart of the dev environment
2. Tried with a new extension of the idoc
In the communication channel log for the JDBC receiver channel I still see
INSERT INTO tblItem () VALUES ()
The payload that I see in the message content tab is as follows
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns0:MT_XXX_XXXX xmlns:ns0="http://capita.com/pi/XXXX">
- <Statement>
- <dbTableName action="INSERT">
<table>tblItem</table>
</dbTableName>
- <access>
<InvoiceNo>0000000009293467</InvoiceNo>
</access>
</Statement>
</ns0:MT_XXX_XXXX>
How do I debug the jdbc adapter to see how it converts the above xml output from the mapping step (note that this output is from an actual run and not test tool) to a sql query.
Very strange that the column names are present in the target payload but it is not reflecting in the query.
I have other tables being populated with the same jdbc receiver communication channel which makes this more and more confusing.
PLEASE ADVICE. -
Pass system ack of JDBC adapter to ERP in IDoc - XI - JDBC scenario
Dear all,
i have an IDoc -> XI -> JDBC scenario (without using ccBPM). In the standard way the ERP system, sending the IDoc waits for an application acknowledgement. However the JDBC adapter is only capeable to send system acknowledgements.
Is there a way to pass these acknowledgements to the IDoc status record?
In help.sap.com (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/ab/bdb13b00ae793be10000000a11402f/frameset.htm) under "IDoc Processing with the IDoc Adapter " there is a table that maps XI system/applic acknowledgement to IDoc status. So in my opinion the status record of my IDoc should at least chenge to the corresponding status for the system ack.
Can anyone tell, if this is really working? What if I deactivate the acknowledgement request in the NOALE programm?
In any case, can I achieve to transfer the system ack to the IDoc status without using a ccBPM?
Many thanks and best regards
FlorianIs there a way to pass these acknowledgements to the IDoc status record?
Without BPM, No.
So in my opinion the status record of my IDoc should at least chenge to the corresponding status for the system ack.
The ack referred here is related to idoc status whether it is properly reached till XI or not and not related to the JDBC ack.
What if I deactivate the acknowledgement request in the NOALE programm?
Then u won't have any ALEAUD message at sender R3.
In any case, can I achieve to transfer the system ack to the IDoc status without using a ccBPM?
No
Regards,
Prateek -
IDOC to JDBC scenario in case of Cost Element Group IDOC.
This is an IDOC to JDBC scenario.
The Cost Element Group IDOC is having different segments. The main segment E1COGH (1...unbound) is consisting of different subsegment like E1OGS (0...unbound) & E1COGV (0...unbound). The main segment (E1COGH) along with subsegments E1OGS & E1COGV) is occuring more that 1 times. I have to insert data into the table, which we can do in single rows (no hierarchy is possible in tables). I have used "use one as many" in message mapping. Now if E1OGS or E1COGV is repeating in a single E1COGH segment then we dont get any error. But if I duplicate the main segment then I am getting runtime exception.
Please suggest about how to map in this case.In my scenario:
E1COGH
|
-> E1COGS
E1COGV
where E1CGH -> Main segment
E1COGS & E1COGV -> sub segment
E1COGH -> 1..unbound
E1COGS -> 1..unbound
E1COGV -> 1..unbound
At the target side I have created two Statement Structure (ie.Statement & Statement_1) . One for E1COGS (ie. Statement) & the other for E1COGV (ie. Statement_1).
Case 1 -> If E1COGS is present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped AS IS.
Case 2 -> If E1COGS is not present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped as blank.
This will be mapped with Statement & in the absence of E1COGS this Statement structure is SUPPRESSED.
Similarly,
Case 1 -> If E1COGV is present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped AS IS.
Case 2 -> If E1COGV is not present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped as blank.
This will be mapped with Statement_1 & in the absence of E1COGV this Statement_1 structure is SUPPRESSED.
All the elements of the segment E1COGH, E1COGHT & E1COGHR are replicated in all the rows for X (no. of occurance of E1COGS) + Y (no. of occurance of E1COGV).
While testing in Message Mapping, I am able to get the output as for multiple occurence of E1COGS & E1COGV in a single E1COGH.
But if I increse the occurence of E1COGH the it is giving the following error :
Runtime exception during processing target field mapping /ns0:MT_Cost_Element_Group_Response/Statement/DBtablename/access/GROUPNAME. The message is: Exception:[com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.IllegalInstanceException: Too few values in first queue in function useOneAsMany. It must have the same number of contexts as second queue.] in class com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.NodeFunctions method useOneAsMany[com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.CollapseContexts@51197231, , ]
Please suggest how to map the occurence of E1COGH simultaneously with the occurence of E1COGS & E1COGV. -
IDOC-XI-JDBC scenario, jdbc sent too slow
i have a IDOC-XI-JDBC scenario,
the problem is that near 5 Lac IDOC is sent to XI, each IDOC is processes by an instance of the scenario, and the sent to the Database is too clow...means 4000 records per hour,
can i configure the JDBC receiver adapter in a way, so that it becomes faster/more concurrent,Hey,
First raise the issue to the DBA he might help resolve the ISSUE more efficently.
Secondly check in the JDBC adapter -> Adavance mode -> Disconnect from the data base after processing each message shouldn't be set.
Even check with Database Transaction Isolation Level -> default is value of the connected database.
<b>The isolation level determines how transactions running in parallel can influence each other</b>
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/64/ce4e886334ec4ea7c2712e11cc567c/content.htm
Why not the other way around > Collect multiple idocs in a file restrict maxium number of idocs to required value then send the file ?
Stefan Grube Example:
/people/stefan.grube/blog/2006/09/18/collecting-idocs-without-using-bpm
if it is with bpm then collect multiple idoc with occurance change and send them.
<b>Cheers,
*RAJ*
**REWARD POINTS IF FOUND USEFULL <b> -
IDOC to JDBC scenario: Does INSERT command expect a result value?
Hello,
we have an IDoc-to-JDBC-scenario configured on our XI 3.0, which uses the INSERT command to put a dataset coming from R/3 into a SQL database. This works fine.
Now a trigger has been activated on the database, which sets a flag to each dataset after inserting.
Because of this a system error occurs in the Adapter Engine and I found in the AuditLog (logSQLStatement=true), that the INSERT command is processed correcty, but in the next step an error is shown up: 'SQLServerException. A result set was generated for update.'
Could it be, that the trigger returns a result value, which can't be handled on the XI ?
If yes, how can I solve this issue? I have read something about the different methods execute(), executeUpdate() and executeQuery(), but I don't know how and where this has to be configured...
Thanks in advance,
JuergenHi Upendra,
I got some more information from the database adminstrator:
He used the following command 'exec xp_cmdshell @ExportCmd , no_output'
whereas @ExportCmd contains the command.
With the no_output option, the xp_cmdshell does not return a recordset.
I hope this will be helpful to you.
Grtz,
Juergen -
Idoc to jdbc scenario of sap xi
Hi All,
i want step by step procedure for developing idoc 2 jdbc scenario. Anybody have this scenario, please send me that.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarjuna.Hi
Have a look at these threads
/people/laxman.molugu/blog/2006/08/13/integration-with-databases-made-easy-150-part-1
Re: Idoc triggering from a transaction
Message Mapping - JDBC to IDoc
Re: JDBC - System/Application Acknowledgement
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/09/01/xi-idoc-adapter--edidc40--demystified
Process Integration (PI) & SOA Middleware
**Reward points if helpfull** -
Error in IDoc to JDBC scenario
Hi friends,
I am configuring an IDoc to JDBC scenario in XI.When I am testing the scenario in Test Configuration then it is getting processed successfully but when I am tseting the entire configuration then in sxmb_moni the following error is showing:
"Error occurred during back-routing Error in communication channel". Please help as I am unable to understand the error.
regards
DebansuHi Debansu,
Please go through the link it may help to solve your problem.
JDBC Adapter / Acknowledgements
Error in back routing Error in communication channel
Regards,
Sridhar Goli
Edited by: sridhar goli on Aug 11, 2008 11:35 AM -
Problem in Idoc to JDBC scenario(uses BPM)
Hi
I have a IDoc to JDBC scenario which also uses BPM.
The JDBC adapter has to execute a Stored procedure on Sybase database.
I work on XI3.0 SP14.
When I am sending IDoc to XI it is failing in CALL adapter step.
The error message is "Unable to convert sender service TruckLiftAccountUpdate to an ALE logical system".
However this scenario is working in Production with same settings.But it is not working in Quality and it is giving the above error.
Can any one help me in this.
Thanks in advance.
KPThanks for your quick reply..
All the settings are in place.
Here the Idoc is coming to BPM and BPM cant able to execute the stored procedure.and we are getting the error from BPM to target system.
Here error is unable to convert the sender service(from BPM service) to ALE
logical system.
same settings are there in Production but it is not working in QA.
Thanks in adavnce,
KP -
Hi,
Hope you all are doing well. I have an IDoc to JDBC scenario. The IDoc structure is as follows:
<IDOC BEGIN="1">
<Structure 1>
<DEFINITION>xxxx</DEFINITION>
<CREATE_DATE>20070706</CREATE_DATE>
</Structure 1 SEGMENT="1">
<Structure 2>
<ELEMENT>xxx1</ELEMENT>
<CREATE_DATE>20070719</CREATE_DATE>
</Structure 2>
<Structure 2>
<ELEMENT>xxx2</ELEMENT>
<CREATE_DATE>20070719</CREATE_DATE>
</Structure 2>
<Structure 3>
<ELEMENT>xxx1</ELEMENT>
<PROJECT>yyyy1</DEFINITION>
</Structure 3>
<Structure 3>
<ELEMENT>xxx1</ELEMENT>
<PROJECT>yyyy2</PROJECT>
</Structure 3>
<Structure 3>
<ELEMENT>xxx2</ELEMENT>
<PROJECT>yyyy3</DEFINITION>
</Structure 3>
<Structure 3>
<ELEMENT>xxx2</ELEMENT>
<PROJECT>yyyy4</PROJECT>
</Structure 3>
</IDOC>
Structures 1, 2 and 3 are at the same level/hierarchy in the IDoc. Structure 3 contains the project name of records in structure 2. The requirement is that if the records in structure 2 have the create date as the current date then the corresponding project in structure 3 has to be passed on to the database by creating a statement. To do this, we need to check the date of the record in structure 2 and if the date is equal to the current date then we have to use the element in structure 2 to select the corresponding rows in structure 3 to be passed on to the database. The INSERT statements have to be created for each of the rows of Structure 3 to be passed on to the database.
How do I achieve this?
I tried using node and text standard functions functions but was unable to achive the objective. Can I use UDF to read the IDoc structures and determine the statements?
regards
DebansuHi Debansu,
Use this Queue type UDF
public void UDF(String[] curDate, String[] Element_Str2, String[] date, String[] Element_Str3, String[] project, ResultList result, Container container) throws StreamTransformationException{
for(int i=0; i<date.length; i++)
if (curDate[0].equals(date<i>))
for(int j=0; j<project.length; j++)
if (Element_Str2<i>.equals(Element_Str2[j]))
result.addValue(project[j]);
Here first parameter is current date function, second parameter is 2nd structure element field, third parameter is date field from 2nd structure, fourth parameter is 3rd structure element field and fifth parameter is project field from 3rd structure.
Regards,
VR -
Hi All,
I am doing a IDOC to JDBC Scenario.I am done with IR and ID.
The Table in the DB is TABLE1 with Field1 and Field2.
Now when I run thescenario it throws an error ,
2009-03-19 12:41:06 Success INSERT INTO TABLE1 (Field1, Field2) VALUES (KM247850, FINJTIA)
2009-03-19 12:41:06 Error Unable to execute statement for table or stored procedure. 'TABLE1' (Structure 'Statement') due to java.sql.SQLException: [EUDNT038]The name "KM247850" is not permitted in this context. Valid expressions are constants, constant expressions, and (in some contexts) variables. Column names are not permitted.
But it has successfully generated the SQL Query which I think is perfect.
But whats the error which follows that?
How do I resolve it?
Thanks,
VenuHi,
It could be due to wrong structure of JDBC, compare your target structure with this blog..
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/06/01/file-to-jdbc-adapter-using-sap-xi-30
Regards,
Sarvesh
Maybe you are looking for
-
Im trying to listen to a book we downloaded from amazon. When we click on it it says we need to enter out audible username and password. I used my apple id username and password and it says it is not correct. I reset this and used it again and it
-
Can you upgrade battery during inevitable replacement of the factory battery
The inevitable death of my notebook battery has occurred. I was getting an hour of battery life with the HP – 484171-001 battery, the 6 cell factory HP battery. I have to buy a new battery. My question is there an upgrade available? Or am I stuck wi
-
CSV to Oracle DB - Upload File
Dear All, I have a scenario where I need to upload data in csv format to tables in Oracle DB. Here is the detailed description of problem. a) User selects a csv file on his desktop which has data in it in csv format. b) A BLOB is insert
-
Dear All, In my scenario am using one raw material for producing one finished goods. In B1 we can track the inventry for raw material and finished goods but how can i track the inventry details for Work in progress items. now i can able to t
-
Failed ABAP process in process chain does not trigger subsequent process
Hello, I have a issue in my process chain with the abap process type. When this abap process gets failed due to some reason; it is not trigerring subsequent step in the chain. Any ideas on how it can be solved or any work-around? I searched the forum