Mapping Issue in Triggering Email

Hi All,
I am having problem in PI Mapping.
Requirement: Trigger an email target structure only if ReturnCode is not equal to 0 and 1.
Source Structure                                                                                Target Structure
Invoice        1..1                                                                                Mail1             1..1
  Return       0..unbounded                                                                                Mail2          0..unbounded
     ReturnCode  1..1                                                                                ReturnCode   0..1
Kindly help me out with the Mapping to be implemented for the same.
I tried below logic,
Mapping 1st Node:
I ReturnCode I I SplitByValue I
                                                       I = I  I Not I                                                                               
I or I I createif I I Spltbyvalue I I removecontext I I Mail1I
                        I Constant(0) I
I ReturnCode I I SplitByValue I
                                                       I = I  I Not I
                        I Constant(1) I
Mapping 2nd Node:
I ReturnCode I I SplitByValue I
                                                       I = I  I Not I                                                                               
I and I I createif I I Spltbyvalue I I removecontext I I Mail2I
                        I Constant(0) I
I ReturnCode I I SplitByValue I
                                                       I = I  I Not I
                        I Constant(1) I
Regards,
Santhu

Hi, you have to use the function equalsS in order to compare strings. After that, createIf seems appropriate.
e.g. Constant(1) equalsS ReturnCode createIf Mail1.
Not is a boolean function and works only for
true
and
false
Please refer to [standard functions on sap help|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/c4cdfc334824478090739c04c4a249/content.htm].

Similar Messages

  • XSLT mapping issue in parent child relation

    Hi Guys,
    i have one XSLT mapping issue. Mapping scenario is from IDoc to file.
    IDoc structure is as below
    <ZLOIPRO1>
      <E1AFKOL>
         <A></A>
         <B></B>
         <E1RESBL>
             <MATNR>1</MATNR>
             <CHARG>1</CHARG>
             <ZSBL>
                 <MTART>ABC</MTART>
             </ZSB>
         </E1RESBL>
         <E1RESBL>
             <MATNR>2</MATNR>
             <CHARG>2</CHARG>
             <ZSBL>
                 <MTART>ZHA1</MTART>
             </ZSB>
         </E1RESBL>
         <E1RESBL>
             <MATNR>3</MATNR>
             <CHARG>3</CHARG>
             <ZSBL>
                 <MTART>ZHA1</MTART>
             </ZSB>
         </E1RESBL>
      </E1AFKOL>
    </ZLOIPRO1>
    As you can see 'E1RESBL' is repeatative. Now my issue is i need to select 'MATNR' and 'CHARG' from 'E1RESBL' segment when first occurance of 'ZSBL/MTART' with value 'ZHA1' appears. i.e. my output would be MATNR = 2 and CHARG = 2.
    I hope i am clear. Please let me know if any solution for this.

    Hi,
    Try this
    <xsl:if test="./ZSBL/MTART == 'ZHA1'">
    <xsl:for-each select="./E1RESBL">
      <MATNR>
       <xsl:value-of select="./MATNR"/>
      </MATNR>
      <BATCH>
       <xsl:value-of select="./CHARG"/>
      </BATCH>
    </xsl:for-each>
    </xsl:if>
    You might need to do some changes in the above.
    Thanks,
    Prakash

  • EA4500 – Smart Wi-Fi interface and Windows Network Map issues

    I purchased this Router about 2 weeks ago as a phased upgrade of our Home Network, primarily to enhance media streaming. It has the latest firmware preinstalled from the factory. Prior to the purchase and installation of the EA4500 Router I replaced my old Motorola SurfBoard SB6120 DOCSIS 3.0 Cable Modem with a Motorola SurfBoard SB6141 DOCSIS 3.0 Cable Modem. My old Linksys E2000 Router worked perfectly with the SB6141, with the exception that the E2000 wasn’t IPv6 enabled, but does have 10/100/1000Base-T Ethernet (RJ-45) and Internet ports.
    The EA4500 has been installed for about 10 days and seems to have improved local network speeds and I don’t seem to be having any Internet connectivity issues. However, there are some disturbing issues with the EA4500 and the AE3000 I purchased. There are 11 devices connected through the Router; a Dell Desktop (wireless with the AE3000), a Dell Desktop (Ethernet), a Dell Laptop (wireless), 2 Canon Printers (1 Ethernet and 1 Wireless), 2 Western Digital 1TB MyBookLive Network Drives (both Ethernet), a WD TV Live Streaming Media Player (wireless), an Apple TV media player (wireless), an iPad (wireless), and an Android Smartphone (wireless).
    Issue 1 – The Linksys Smart Wi-Fi interface appears to be unreliable at times!!! I’ve read about this problem here on the Community involving the EA6500, so I don’t know if this is a Linksys Server issue, as suggested in a few responses, or a bug in the Router firmware, or defective hardware. However, when the interface locks up, it can’t be accessed from a wireless or wired connection. Usually, powering down the Router and then powering it back up and restart will allow it to function again. However, at times before the interface completely locks up it shows either just a white screen or the security screen will show no firewall features enabled. This is a little scary, so I’ll do a complete reset and setup; this is becoming a pain in the rear!!!!! Is there any hope for this being fixed, in this Router, not the next generation??????????
    Issue 2 - All of my network devices show up in the Router’s Device List. Except for the Apple devices they also show up, when they are online, in Windows 7 Explorer under Network and when you click on Network they are correctly displayed as Computers, Media Devices, Network Infrastructure, or Storage. However, when you click on “Open Network and Sharing Center” and then click on “See Full Map”; it fails with the response “Windows cannot create the network map. Responses from other devices on the network are delayed or there is an incompatible router on the network”; no device map is shown. When I follow the link for more information, the only thing that stands out is “A device on the network, such as a hub or switch, is not working properly or is not compatible with the Link Layer Topology Discovery (LLTD) protocol, which Windows uses to create the map. To fix this problem, disable the device, turn it off, or remove it from your network”. All of my network devices showed up on the Network Map with the old E2000. This issue is the same on all of my computers, either wired or wireless. Any known solutions for this, or is it as Windows suggests; an incompatible Router????
    Thanks in advance for any insight or solutions. With the issues I’m having with the EA4500 and the AE3000; they are both probably going back to Amazon.

    thebluemamba_24; Thank you for your suggestion; I finally found time yesterday to perform an extensive evaluation before I return the Router. However, rather than trying to add devices manually, my rationale was if the EA4500 can’t process them correctly, automatically, it needs to be returned anyway, so I added devices normally letting the device an Router handle the process.
    In thinking through this issue, all devices on our network are detected and identified by Windows Explorer on Windows 7 computers; except of course the Apple and Android devices (Apple TV, iPad, and Smartphone). So, I wondered if one of those three devices being added to the Router’s device list was somehow causing issues or interfering with Windows 7’s ability to generate a Network Map. Therefore, my approach was to turn off or disable all devices on our network, reset the Router to factory defaults, reestablish the Router to my custom Home Network configuration using a Windows 7 PC that has LAN and Wireless access to the Router, then add one device at a time and check with each addition to see if Windows 7 could still generate a Network Map.
    With the Router reset and reestablishment complete; I began the process of adding one device at a time and checking to see if a Network Map was being generated. What I discovered was when a recent addition to the network, a Western Digital WD TV Live Streaming Media Player, was connected (wirelessly), Windows 7 could no longer generate the Network Map and the failure was consistent. The only way to get the Network Map to work again was to remove power from the WD TV Live, although it remained in the EA4500’s Device List; simply turning it off didn’t help. Since I’d originally witnessed the Windows 7 Network Map working with the Linksys E2000 Router that the EA4500 replaced, I decided to test the WD TV Live with that Router. It worked initially, but it failed consistently after the first success. Interestingly, the failure indication was a little different, but nevertheless generation of the Network Map failed.
    I’ve tried changing a few settings on the EA4500 as well as the WD TV Live, but nothing helped. There was a recent firmware update to the WD TV Live, so I might try rolling back the firmware to see if it makes a difference.
    The Network Map issue might very well be an issue with the WD TV Live, not the Router, but after reading many threads on this Community I have reservations that the problems I’m experiencing with the Smart interface lockup will be fixed. I suspect new emerging replacement products will be the focus and these older products will be abandoned and no more firmware fixes will be forthcoming and I don’t want to spend more money for a new product just to fix old problems and get something that works properly. The Network Map issue is troublesome, but the lockup of the Router’s “Linksys Smart Wi-Fi” interface is a serious matter to me. It appears that once it locks up, the only way to correct it is a power off restart; not practical if you’re traveling and trying to access settings remotely; the selling point for this feature.
    Given the problems I’m experiencing with the EA4500 and AE3000, I guess I’ll return them. Too bad, because otherwise the EA4500 seems like it’s a good Router. I’ve been brand loyal since the Linksys WRT54G came out, but after reading this Community and with my personal experience with the EA4500 and AE3000, now I’ll probably give the NETGEAR N900 equivalents a try.

  • Credit memo and MAP issue

    Hello Guru's
    I have 2 issues, and i am unable to understand the system logic for the same
    Issue 1:-
    We have an Intercomapny scenario
    sequence of transaction is as follows
    1. Create Return purchase order (document type NB) - Intercompany purchase
    2. Post return goods receipts - movement type 161
    3. Post credit memo with respect to return purchase order
    4. Cancel the movement type 161 - using 161 movement type
    System allows me to cancel the document created using 161 movement type
    Step 4 should not be allowed but system is allowing me to do so, please advise how to stop this
    Issue 2:-
    I have a strange MAP issues which is flactuating very drastically
    the scenario is as follows
    Store stock is 10 ea, stock value is 1000, MAP is 100
    DC map is 25
    When we make return STO from store to DC, ths stocks are issued at DC MAP (condition type P101)
    Assume we issue 9 quantity from Store then
    Store stock is 9 ea, stock value is (1000-(25*9)) =  775, MAP is 775/1 = 775
    This transaction is causing major flactuation in store MAP (100 changed to 775)
    Please advise if there is any way we can control this behaviour
    I understand that there is a setting which will in case of major MAP changes will put the amount into PRD account.
    Appreciate if you can guide me to help
    Regards
    Amit

    Hi,
    For your first scenario,
    for a retun po of IC NB type, after creating the PO you  need to deliver the same at VL10G. For the delivery system will allow to create the PGR . Prior to these steps you need to return the goods using 161 at MIGO.Please check this 161 stock posted to stock in transit.After PGR system will clear the stock in transit.
    Now after claring the stock from transit try cancelling the MIGO 161 document.
    For the second query,
    Please review your question' When we make return STO from store to DC, ths stocks are issued at DC MAP (condition type P101)
    Assume we issue 9 quantity from Store then
    Store stock is 9 ea, stock value is (1000-(25*9)) = 775, MAP is 775/1 = 775
    This transaction is causing major flactuation in store MAP (100 changed to 775),
    Please review the third line.
    Regards,

  • Mapping issue in idoc to JDBC scenario

    mapping issue in idoc to JDBC scenario
    source structure
    E1KNB1M
      BUKRS = 1000
    E1KNB1M
      BUKRS=  9000
    E1KNB1M
      BUKRS=  2000
    THE NODE E1KNB1M is repeated many times and the field BUKRS is also repeated with E1KNB1M as above
    TARGET field : ISFRANCHISE
    if any where value of BUKRS =9000 we have to pass Y to the target filed, else N
    if BUKRS = 9000   THEN ISFRANCHISE= Y
                   ELSE
                ISFRANCHISE=N
    I've done the mapping as below
    BUKRS = 9000--> IF THEN Y ELSE N--
    > ISFRANCHISE
    BUT everry time the target value is N only
    pl suggest
    rgds
    mojib

    mapped like this
    BUKRS--->SORT---->
                                                 EQUALS --------IF---THEN    Y
    9000------------------------>                                               ----------------->ISFRANCHISE
                                                                  ELSE   N
    context of BUKRS set to parent node
    its worked
    thanks to all for valuable suggestions
    rgds
    mojib

  • Error handling in server proxy - triggering email

    Hi,
    i have WS->XI->CRM scenario.
    i am using server proxy at CRM side.
    I want to hadle errors in ABAP server proxy.
    i am using fault message and collecting and raising the error.
    Everything is fine.
    But to know the error i have to come SXMB_MONI of CRM.
    But in real scenario how it works. some one will not come and see every time.
    How to notify ( may be triggering  email ) some one in the organization if some error occurs in SXMB_MONI.
    Is there any automatic method?? if yes, how to do that.
    Thanks in advance...

    Configure alerts
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9418d690-0201-0010-85bb-e9b2c1af895b
    U may also use CCMS monitoring
    /people/sap.india5/blog/2005/12/06/xi-ccms-alert-monitoring-overview-and-features
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • Mapping issue - if value matches on of several conditions

    Hi champs,
    I have a mapping in PI 7.1 of an invoice-xml  to a INVOIC02-idoc.
    I am mapping the invoice sums to E1EDS01-segments and just want to map five of several qualifiers. So I have set up a mapping for the qualifier field SUMID that just maps those five qualifiers, and map the SUMME-field from inbound message as it is.
    Now it shows that our vendors send more than those five qualifiers I have in my mapping. Since I don´t have any control of the SUMME-field all seven values get mapped into the Idoc (generating seven E1EDS01-segments), but only the five segments with my mapped SUMID get the SUMID-field. So I get in total seven E1EDS01 segments in which I get only the SUMME in two of them.
    So my question is: Are there any pretty ways to handle this kind of mapping issues besides using a lot of equalS, if and or?
    I would like to be able to say (in as simple a function as possible)  that if qualifier in field A is X, Y or Z then map the value in field B to SUMME. How do I do that? BTW I am not a java-programmer so advanced java-codes are not a good way for me to handle it.
    regards,
    Glenn

    Write an UDF with this code:
    public void <UDFNAME>(String <FieldName>,Container container){
    If (<FieldName> == "X" || <FieldName> == "Y" || <FieldName> == "Z"){
    return <FieldName>;
    Edited by: spantaleoni on Mar 16, 2011 4:04 PM

  • Mapping issue with context again

    I again need help with a mapping issue. I don’t know how to handle the contexts to get this working in the xi graphical mapping tool.  I have previously logged a question regarding this structure but the requirements have now changed. 
    I have a source document that has multiple delivery line items and for each delivery line item, there are multiple handling units. Each handling unit contains the line number of the delivery line item it belongs to. This structure has been simplified below.
    <b><u>Source Sample</u></b>
    <DOCUMENT>
    <DELIVERY_LINEITEM>
    <LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
    <MATERIAL>mat 1</MATERIAL>
    </DELIVERY_LINEITEM >
    <DELIVERY_LINEITEM >
    <LINENUMBER>20</LINENUMBER>
    <MATERIAL>mat 2</MATERIAL>
    </DELIVERY_LINEITEM >
    <HANDLING_UNITS>
    <HU_LABEL>123</HU_LABEL>
    <HU_ITEM>
    <LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
    </HU_ITEM>
    </HANDLING_UNITS>
    <HANDLING_UNITS>
    <HU_LABEL>456</HU_LABEL>
    <HU_ITEM>
    <LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
    </HU_ITEM>
    </HANDLING_UNITS>
    <HANDLING_UNITS>
    <HU_LABEL>789</HU_LABEL>
    <HU_ITEM>
    <LINENUMBER>20</LINENUMBER>
    </HU_ITEM>
    </HANDLING_UNITS>
    </DOCUMENT>
    <u><b>Source Structure</b></u>
    DOCUMENT 1..1
    DELIVERY_LINEITEM 1..unbounded
    LINENUMBER 1..1
    MATERIAL 1..1
    HANDLING_UNITS 1..unbounded
    HU_LABEL 1..1
    HU_ITEM 1..1
    LINENUMBER 1..1
    In the target structure, I need to output each handling unit along with the corresponding DELIVERY_LINEITEM material.  Target structure has been simplified below:
    <u><b>Target Sample</b></u>
    <DOCUMENT>
    <ROW>
    <PACKAGING>
    <HU_LABEL>123</HU_LABEL>
    </PACKAGING>
    <PACKAGING_ITEM>
    <LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
    <MATERIAL>mat 1</MATERIAL>
    </PACKAGING_ITEM>
    </ROW>
    <ROW>
    <PACKAGING>
    <HU_LABEL>456</HU_LABEL>
    </PACKAGING>
    <PACKAGING_ITEM>
    <LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
    <MATERIAL>mat 1</MATERIAL>
    </PACKAGING_ITEM>
    </ROW>
    <ROW>
    <PACKAGING>
    <HU_LABEL>789</HU_LABEL>
    </PACKAGING>
    <PACKAGING_ITEM>
    <LINENUMBER>20</LINENUMBER>
    <MATERIAL>mat 2</MATERIAL>
    </PACKAGING_ITEM>
    </ROW>
    </DOCUMENT>
    <u><b>Target Structure</b></u>
    DOCUMENT 1..1
    ROW 1..unbounded    
    PACKAGING 1...1
    HU_LABEL 1..1
    PACKAGING_ITEM 1..1
    LINENUMBER 1..1
    MATERIAL 1..1
    Note, 1 ROW in the target structure = 1 HANDLING_UNITS from the source structure.
    Can anyone help me to achieve this? I do not know how to map the relevant DELIVERY_LINEITEM\MATERIAL from the source structure to the target structure.

    JM,
    Please find the solution. Reply back if it helps or not
    http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1045178998&size=o
    http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1045179010&size=o
    http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1045179022&size=o
    Results :http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1045179134&size=o
    <b>Code used:</b>
    for(int j=0;j<Handling_Linenum.length;j++)
    for(int k=0;k<Delivery_Linenum.length;k++)
    if(Handling_Linenum[j].equals(Delivery_Linenum[k]))
    result.addValue(""Material[k]"");
    result.addContextChange();
    Best regards,
    raj.

  • Java mapping of application triggered an exception

    Hi,
    We have ascenario where a vendor will be sending us a cXML file which has the second line as <!DOCTYPE cXML SYSTEM "http://xml.cxml.org/schemas/cXML/1.2.009/InvoiceDetail.dtd">. If I open it in XMLSpy, it is saying the file as invalid. XI is unable to map this file. So we decided to remove that line using Java mapping and then do the regular graphical mapping.
    I took the java code from the SAP note 812966 and used the aii_map_api.jar, dom.jar, jaxp-api.jar to create the class of that java file and used that class file by importing that into XI as a jar file.
    I'm getting this error in the request message mapping of SXMB_MONI
    <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="MAPPING">STREAM_TRANSFORMATION_EX</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>mypackage/DeleteDTDDeclarationWithDOM</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2>Failed to load resource from the context classloa~</SAP:P2>
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Java mapping of application triggered an exception</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    I'm new to this java mapping, Can you please provide me some details about what files need to be loaded into the XI along with the class file.
    Appreciate you help.
    Thanks,
    MT.

    Hi Prateek,
    Thanks for your quick reply. Yes I have downloaded the aii_map_api.jar from <SAP_install_dir>/<system_name>/<instance_name>/j2ee/cluster/server<number>/apps/sap.com/com.sap.xi.services/
    And also I have compiled my java code using the dom.jar, sax.jar, jaxp-api.jar and aii_map_api.jar.
    I took the class file of my javacode and all the class files of the above mentioned jar files and prepared one single jar file, which I imported into XI.
    It is not allowing me to make a single jar of the actual class file and all the supporting jar files.
    What is the actual method of doing it.
    Appreciate all your help. Thanks very much.
    Thanks,
    Maulik.

  • File - XI - Idoc : mapping issue

    Hello gurus,
    I have a mapping issue:
    I have a mapping between FICABillingNotification to FKK_EBS_DOC_TREE
    Some fields are mapped one to one, others a mapped to constants.
    But for some reason i don't know, not all fields get the right value.
    For example:
    Working:
    Constant 1 --> BEGIN
    Constant LS --> RCVPRT (Receiver Partner Type)
    Not working:
    Constant FILE-->RCVPOR (Receiver Port)
    I had an other value the first time i tried it, but now i changed it to FILE but this value is not used by the mapping.
    Any help would be welcome
    Thanks
    Thomas
    Edited by: Thomas Pary on May 28, 2008 3:36 PM

    This was allready done (sorry i didn't answered that question).
    But Ok now i see, that for this RCVPOR the value of the constant "FILE" is mapped, and i can see it in the payload in SXMB_MONI after the mapping. But it isn't populated to the IDoc field :-s
    Another problem is, that like the one said above, some of my values are not mapped :
    <FICAExternalBilling>
    --<DocumentHeader> mapped to EF1KK_EBS_DOC_HEADER
    <BillFromId>25001254</BillFromId> mapped to REF_DOC_NUMBER
    <PostingDate>20080520</PostingDate> mapped to POST_DATE
    <DocumentDate>20080520</DocumentDate> mapped to DOC_DATE
    <OriginTypeId>IV</OriginTypeId> mapped to EXT_DOC_TYPE
    <ObjectType/>
    <ObjectKey/>
    <PendingCommitmentGroupID/>
    <InvoiceReferenceID/>
    <DisputeDocumentReferenceID/>
    --</DocumentHeader>
    The value of OriginTypeId is not mapped, but the value of DocumentDate and PostingDate are mapped.

  • Mapping issue: from unbound node to two single fields

    Hello,
    I have a source message with a node that is 0... unbounded.
    The node contains a field named "component_name" with occurence  1..1.
    The target message contains only two single fields (component1, component2) and the task is to provide the first two occurences to these fields.
    node occ.1
       component <modul beta>      ->    component1
    node occ.2
       component <modul omega>      ->    component2
    We can expect to have any case like these:
    node is 0   -> no components provided
    node is 1  -> one component provided  (usual case) , so second field will be empty
    node is 2 -> two components provided
    node is > 2 -> need to pick the first two components to provide them to the target fields.
    Does anybody here have an idea how to solve this mapping issue?
    Your ideas are really welcome!
    Best regards
    Dirk

    Stefan's solution is very good, alternatively, if you are sure that you will always have at least two items you can do
    source -> copyValue[0]-> target
    source -> copyValue[1]-> target
    please note: if you don't have at least two items in your source the copyValue function will throw an exception

  • Mapping issue: link related items together based on a key

    Hi guys,
    I have a mapping issue.
    I have a source structure like this:
    <ad>
      <key>
      <value1>
    </ad>
    <ad>
      <key2>
      <value2>
    </ad>
    <bx>
      <key>
      <value3>
    </bx>
    <bx>
      <key2>
      <value4>
    </bx>
    <bx>
      <key2>
      <value5>
    </bx>
    I need to get this:
    <kitem>
      <value1>
      <bx>
        <value3>
      </bx>
    </kitem>
    <kitem>
      <value2>
      <bx>
        <value4>
        <value5>
      </bx>
    </kitem>
    Any idea, how to achieve this?
    Thanks,
    Olian
    Edited by: Olian Saludew on Aug 4, 2009 12:08 PM

    Hi,
    See the following mapping image:
    [http://www.imagenonline.com/img_a162827.gif|http://www.imagenonline.com/img_a162827.gif]
    Regards
    Ivan

  • Z10 encoding issue in outgoing email

    Hoping someone can help me. I've been an avid bb fan for years and my husband and I both handed in our bonds a week ago to move to the z10. We are both loving it. While my husband has had no issues with his I am very close to having no issues - except for one major one that affects me and my clients greatly. I have 2 email accounts - gmail (working without any issue at all - was up and running within a matter of minutes of receiving my z10). The other however has not been a fun or even manageable experience. My work email is web based and took a few days for me to even get it up and running. With my bold I was able to connect via Exchange but am no longer able to do so. I was told to connect via Active sync however my employer does not have this functionality and it is not supported. Following that I was told to connect using either IMAP or POP. And while I have been finally able to connect and receive my email when I SEND email it is a disaster!!!!! My out going mail seems to be adding in all of the encoding and so it becomes "unreadable" for lack of a better term. I have no idea where to turn on this. I have been constantly surfing and searching and and all forums that I can in hopes to find a resolution but have not yet found one - this is my last resort - otherwise sadly ....... Very, very sadly I will have to return my phone. Any suggestions at all would be much appreciated! Sorry for the "long-winded ness"

    lesedwards wrote:
    I agree. I run my own business in fact two business and I cannot be sending emails out from some half **bleep** address how professional does that look. Everything has worked perfect for 10 years and then I bought this piece of **bleep** called a Z10 and it even worked on it until the OS update.
    Wow lesedwards.. you are on fire. Jacking your issue into every email thread and getting **bleep**ed constantly.
    This thread was about an encoding issue, and from your other posts you are simply having connection issues.
    @Sarealex - I haven't seen this issue with any of my email accounts over IMAP, what software version are you currently using?
    -: DrewRead :-
    Can't find an app on Blackberry World yet? Tweet the developer and ask when they will #GetWithBB10 !!
    "Like it" if you like it.

  • Changed Purchase order triggering Email and Fax to vendor

    Hello,
    Ecc6.0 srm3.0.
    a changed purchase order triggering email to vendor, although in the table BBPD_PO_METAOUT all the fields are unchecked and we donu2019t have customization in the table BBPD_COMP_FIELDS,
    Please suggest, we donu2019t want email of fax to be triggered when we amend the purchase order,
    Thanks for reply.
    jairaj

    When we change vendor text, It is SAP std that mail will triger to vendor

  • N:M mapping issue

    Hello, can any1 please help me with following mapping issue?
    Input Msg Type 1 (Items to be grouped)
    Item (0..n)
       X  (0..1)
       Y (0..1)
       Z  (0..1)
       SegmentSub1 (0..n)
          a (0..1)
          b (0..1)
          ChildSegmentWithChilds (0..n)
              a (0..1)
              b (0..1)
              AnotherChildSegmentWithChilds (0..n)
         a (0..1)
         b (0..1)
       SegmentSub2 (0..n)
           a (0..1)
           b (0..1)
    Input Msg Type 2 (GroupingCodes)
    Group (0..n)
        Code (0..1)
    Output Msg Type (Items Grouped by Group codes)
    GroupedItems (0..n)
      Items (0..n)
         X  (0..1)
         Y (0..1)
         Z  (0..1)
         SegmentSub1 (0..n)
            a (0..1)
            b (0..1)
            ChildSegmentWithChilds (0..n)
                a (0..1)
                b (0..1)
                AnotherChildSegmentWithChilds (0..n)
               a (0..1)
           b (0..1)
         SegmentSub2 (0..n)
             a (0..1)
             b (0..1)
    Mapping logic should be as following;
    Item/X = Group/Code. (Items grouping by "X" field for each "Code" value)
    any help greatly appreciated,
    Thanks!

    Okan,
    Did you got the solution for  this mapping, I'm really sorry for the past one week I was trying to figure it out, finally today I got it, yahoo!!!! I think am bit slow <b>:-(</b>
      If you got the solution already no probes, if you haven't kindly follow the below logic.
    <b><i>Source & Target structure</i></b>
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545133789/
    <b><i>Mapping logic & UDF - Grouped Items</i></b>
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545133791/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545133801/
    <b><i>Mapping logic & UDF - Item</i></b>
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545133807/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545133811/
    <b><i>Mapping logic & UDF - x node</i></b>
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545138911/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545138913/
    <b><i>Mapping logic & UDF - y node</i></b>
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545138915/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545138917/
    <b><i>Mapping logic & UDF - z node</i></b>
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545138947/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545138951/
    <b><i>Mapping - Results</i></b>
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545005958/
    I hope it helps you!!!!
    Thanks for the patience.
    Best regards,
    raj.

Maybe you are looking for