Mapping issue - nQSError: 15018

hi..
I have creataed a new business model which contains 3 fact table(f1, f2, f3) and 3 dimension tables(d1, d2, d3)..
Initially in the physical layer the fact table f3 was absent and thats why i have created that and make a primary key and mapped that primary key with the dimension table d3's foreign key.
after that i have created the business model where in the business model whole diagram i have made all the simple joins maintaining the primary key foreign key relationship. the global consistancy check is ok without any errors or warnings.
Now from the presentation services, when i have made a report from that business model then it is throwing the error..
*A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table d3) does not contain mapping for [f3.column1]. (HY000)*
I am surprised that according to the error, the obiee is considering d3 as a fact table...but it should not be..
How can i resolve that...please help..

Hi User,
In BMM layer check whether there is mapping for f3 and d3 in business diagram which you had given in physical diagram.Give the complex join for this.
Thanks
Diney

Similar Messages

NQSError: 15018 : Incorrect Mapping

Hi,
I'm in a situation where am getting this error:
A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source *(for fact table F2)* does not contain mapping for *[Dim D1]*
Now mapping in BMM and Physical layer is
D1 -----> F1
D2------->F1
D3-------->F2
Am not able to understand, even though there is no column from Fact F2 is envolved in creating request, still the error persists..
Am I missing something?
Regards,
Jitendra

Hi,
you have to set total level for D1 and D2 in the LTS of F2, and tatal level for D3 int he LTS F1.
F1 levels:
D1 - detail level
D2 - detail level
D3 - total level
F2 levels
D1 - total level
D2 - total level
D3 - detail level
This is tha way to prevent the error, for example you have:
D1 D3 F1 F2
a b 10 100
D1 D3 D2 F1 F2
a b c 10 null
But if you want that also the data of the F2 table are displayed put all the measures of the F2 at total level (in the hiearchy) for D1 and D3, and all the measures of the fact table F1 at total level of D3.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Gianluca

NQSError 15018 Incorrectly defined logical table source error

Hi,
I am getting the following error when I am building one of my reports.
I have 3 dimensions - Time, customer and Product and two facts F1 and F2. Both F1 and F2 are joined to all three dimensions
The part I dont understand is that when I built a report with columns from all 3 dimensions and 2 facts it worked fine. But as soon as I added a new column from the customer dimension I am getting the below error. When I remove this specific column the report works fine.
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table F1) does not contain mapping for [Time.Mth_name, Time.Year]. (HY000)
Please help me figure out the issue.

Hello All,
I am also getting the same error.
I have one dim table d1 and 2 fact tables f1 and f2.
f1 contains 5 columns and f2 contains 2 columns. I created a logical table source between f1 and f2. Column mapping is done between f1.agency_no and f2.agency_no.
Columns in f1 : agency_no, agency_name,source, proj#, proj_phase
Columns in f2: agency_no, manager
Columns in d1: agency_no, agency_shortname, agency_name
Now, when i select f1.agency_no and f2.agency_no in the report. It is working fine, because the column mapping is defined between these 2 columns.
When i drag f2.manager into the report (report contains f1.agency_no, f2.agency_no, f2.manager) i am getting the following error.
[nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table f2) does not contain mapping for [f1.agency_no]. (HY000)
Please help me out with this issue.
Thanks in advance.

RE:[nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table sourc

Hi Experts,
Actually we have a report by using X subject area and there are two users(Y,Z) accessing the report but for one user(Y) the report is looking fine for other user(Z) it is showing the below error
but for both users having same permission on the X subject area.
*[nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table ABC) does not contain mapping for .ROW_ID)*
here in the report does not contain any column from the ABC fact table .
weather this is an security issues or any technical issue because one user is getting the report and other user is not getting the report.
Can any one guide me regarding the above issue...
Regards,

Since you have formatted the error message its not clear ROW_ID is from which table.
Here I'll give few hints to cross check.
1 There should be no key on fact tables in the Business Model.
2 Use Complex joins, not Foreign Key joins, in the Business Model.
3 All dimensions should have hierarchies defined
4 Content tab settings
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Mar 26, 2013 10:03 AM
It would be nice if you update your old post before you post new one, that helps you to get responses
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Apr 18, 2013 6:32 AM
Whats the solution or fix?
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Apr 18, 2013 6:55 AM

How avoid the error nQSError: 15018 in Answers?

Hi
I have a DWH with 45 fact tables and 146 dimensions. The model is star, in OBI EE the physical and the logical layers are similars.
In the presentation Layer, I group the 45 facts in 6 subject areas, in each subject area I include the dimensions to have relation with the facts in this subject areas. However some dimensions that have relation with a facts, don't have relations with others.
The problem is that the user sees all dimensions an all facts of a subject area and select items of dimensions that not have relation with the fact to analyze, then the user receive the error:
"State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table XXXX) does not contain mapping for [YYYY.ZZZZZ]. (HY000)"
This project is a migration of reports from Oracle Discoverer, in Discoverer the user select the fact an only the dimensions with Foreign Keys to this fact are availables, others are hide. Exist some behavior similar in OBI EE?, what is the best practice to avoit the error nQSError: 15018?
Edwin

Hi
Thank you for your reply. I want clarify that the subject areas are in the presentation layers how presentation catalogs, in the business and model mapping layer only exist one business model and in the physical layer only exist one database and one schema.
In the business model diagram I see the differents facts and its dimensions in star model. The question is:
Do I need to separate the facts in differents presentation catalogs?
The presentation catalog in the presentation layer organize the information with a business point of view. I think that the users don't need to know the model, however with this behavior the user receive errors when cross information from tables than don't have relationships.
I would like to see a similar behavior than discoverer, where the dimensions are hidden or not depending that the fact selected.
Thanks
Edwin

XSLT mapping issue in parent child relation

Hi Guys,
i have one XSLT mapping issue. Mapping scenario is from IDoc to file.
IDoc structure is as below
<ZLOIPRO1>
<E1AFKOL>
 <A></A>
 
 <E1RESBL>
 <MATNR>1</MATNR>
 <CHARG>1</CHARG>
 <ZSBL>
 <MTART>ABC</MTART>
 </ZSB>
 </E1RESBL>
 <E1RESBL>
 <MATNR>2</MATNR>
 <CHARG>2</CHARG>
 <ZSBL>
 <MTART>ZHA1</MTART>
 </ZSB>
 </E1RESBL>
 <E1RESBL>
 <MATNR>3</MATNR>
 <CHARG>3</CHARG>
 <ZSBL>
 <MTART>ZHA1</MTART>
 </ZSB>
 </E1RESBL>
</E1AFKOL>
</ZLOIPRO1>
As you can see 'E1RESBL' is repeatative. Now my issue is i need to select 'MATNR' and 'CHARG' from 'E1RESBL' segment when first occurance of 'ZSBL/MTART' with value 'ZHA1' appears. i.e. my output would be MATNR = 2 and CHARG = 2.
I hope i am clear. Please let me know if any solution for this.

Hi,
Try this
<xsl:if test="./ZSBL/MTART == 'ZHA1'">
<xsl:for-each select="./E1RESBL">
<MATNR>
 <xsl:value-of select="./MATNR"/>
</MATNR>
<BATCH>
 <xsl:value-of select="./CHARG"/>
</BATCH>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:if>
You might need to do some changes in the above.
Thanks,
Prakash

EA4500 – Smart Wi-Fi interface and Windows Network Map issues

I purchased this Router about 2 weeks ago as a phased upgrade of our Home Network, primarily to enhance media streaming. It has the latest firmware preinstalled from the factory. Prior to the purchase and installation of the EA4500 Router I replaced my old Motorola SurfBoard SB6120 DOCSIS 3.0 Cable Modem with a Motorola SurfBoard SB6141 DOCSIS 3.0 Cable Modem. My old Linksys E2000 Router worked perfectly with the SB6141, with the exception that the E2000 wasn’t IPv6 enabled, but does have 10/100/1000Base-T Ethernet (RJ-45) and Internet ports.
The EA4500 has been installed for about 10 days and seems to have improved local network speeds and I don’t seem to be having any Internet connectivity issues. However, there are some disturbing issues with the EA4500 and the AE3000 I purchased. There are 11 devices connected through the Router; a Dell Desktop (wireless with the AE3000), a Dell Desktop (Ethernet), a Dell Laptop (wireless), 2 Canon Printers (1 Ethernet and 1 Wireless), 2 Western Digital 1TB MyBookLive Network Drives (both Ethernet), a WD TV Live Streaming Media Player (wireless), an Apple TV media player (wireless), an iPad (wireless), and an Android Smartphone (wireless).
Issue 1 – The Linksys Smart Wi-Fi interface appears to be unreliable at times!!! I’ve read about this problem here on the Community involving the EA6500, so I don’t know if this is a Linksys Server issue, as suggested in a few responses, or a bug in the Router firmware, or defective hardware. However, when the interface locks up, it can’t be accessed from a wireless or wired connection. Usually, powering down the Router and then powering it back up and restart will allow it to function again. However, at times before the interface completely locks up it shows either just a white screen or the security screen will show no firewall features enabled. This is a little scary, so I’ll do a complete reset and setup; this is becoming a pain in the rear!!!!! Is there any hope for this being fixed, in this Router, not the next generation??????????
Issue 2 - All of my network devices show up in the Router’s Device List. Except for the Apple devices they also show up, when they are online, in Windows 7 Explorer under Network and when you click on Network they are correctly displayed as Computers, Media Devices, Network Infrastructure, or Storage. However, when you click on “Open Network and Sharing Center” and then click on “See Full Map”; it fails with the response “Windows cannot create the network map. Responses from other devices on the network are delayed or there is an incompatible router on the network”; no device map is shown. When I follow the link for more information, the only thing that stands out is “A device on the network, such as a hub or switch, is not working properly or is not compatible with the Link Layer Topology Discovery (LLTD) protocol, which Windows uses to create the map. To fix this problem, disable the device, turn it off, or remove it from your network”. All of my network devices showed up on the Network Map with the old E2000. This issue is the same on all of my computers, either wired or wireless. Any known solutions for this, or is it as Windows suggests; an incompatible Router????
Thanks in advance for any insight or solutions. With the issues I’m having with the EA4500 and the AE3000; they are both probably going back to Amazon.

thebluemamba_24; Thank you for your suggestion; I finally found time yesterday to perform an extensive evaluation before I return the Router. However, rather than trying to add devices manually, my rationale was if the EA4500 can’t process them correctly, automatically, it needs to be returned anyway, so I added devices normally letting the device an Router handle the process.
In thinking through this issue, all devices on our network are detected and identified by Windows Explorer on Windows 7 computers; except of course the Apple and Android devices (Apple TV, iPad, and Smartphone). So, I wondered if one of those three devices being added to the Router’s device list was somehow causing issues or interfering with Windows 7’s ability to generate a Network Map. Therefore, my approach was to turn off or disable all devices on our network, reset the Router to factory defaults, reestablish the Router to my custom Home Network configuration using a Windows 7 PC that has LAN and Wireless access to the Router, then add one device at a time and check with each addition to see if Windows 7 could still generate a Network Map.
With the Router reset and reestablishment complete; I began the process of adding one device at a time and checking to see if a Network Map was being generated. What I discovered was when a recent addition to the network, a Western Digital WD TV Live Streaming Media Player, was connected (wirelessly), Windows 7 could no longer generate the Network Map and the failure was consistent. The only way to get the Network Map to work again was to remove power from the WD TV Live, although it remained in the EA4500’s Device List; simply turning it off didn’t help. Since I’d originally witnessed the Windows 7 Network Map working with the Linksys E2000 Router that the EA4500 replaced, I decided to test the WD TV Live with that Router. It worked initially, but it failed consistently after the first success. Interestingly, the failure indication was a little different, but nevertheless generation of the Network Map failed.
I’ve tried changing a few settings on the EA4500 as well as the WD TV Live, but nothing helped. There was a recent firmware update to the WD TV Live, so I might try rolling back the firmware to see if it makes a difference.
The Network Map issue might very well be an issue with the WD TV Live, not the Router, but after reading many threads on this Community I have reservations that the problems I’m experiencing with the Smart interface lockup will be fixed. I suspect new emerging replacement products will be the focus and these older products will be abandoned and no more firmware fixes will be forthcoming and I don’t want to spend more money for a new product just to fix old problems and get something that works properly. The Network Map issue is troublesome, but the lockup of the Router’s “Linksys Smart Wi-Fi” interface is a serious matter to me. It appears that once it locks up, the only way to correct it is a power off restart; not practical if you’re traveling and trying to access settings remotely; the selling point for this feature.
Given the problems I’m experiencing with the EA4500 and AE3000, I guess I’ll return them. Too bad, because otherwise the EA4500 seems like it’s a good Router. I’ve been brand loyal since the Linksys WRT54G came out, but after reading this Community and with my personal experience with the EA4500 and AE3000, now I’ll probably give the NETGEAR N900 equivalents a try.

Credit memo and MAP issue

Hello Guru's
I have 2 issues, and i am unable to understand the system logic for the same
Issue 1:-
We have an Intercomapny scenario
sequence of transaction is as follows
1. Create Return purchase order (document type NB) - Intercompany purchase
2. Post return goods receipts - movement type 161
3. Post credit memo with respect to return purchase order
4. Cancel the movement type 161 - using 161 movement type
System allows me to cancel the document created using 161 movement type
Step 4 should not be allowed but system is allowing me to do so, please advise how to stop this
Issue 2:-
I have a strange MAP issues which is flactuating very drastically
the scenario is as follows
Store stock is 10 ea, stock value is 1000, MAP is 100
DC map is 25
When we make return STO from store to DC, ths stocks are issued at DC MAP (condition type P101)
Assume we issue 9 quantity from Store then
Store stock is 9 ea, stock value is (1000-(25*9)) = 775, MAP is 775/1 = 775
This transaction is causing major flactuation in store MAP (100 changed to 775)
Please advise if there is any way we can control this behaviour
I understand that there is a setting which will in case of major MAP changes will put the amount into PRD account.
Appreciate if you can guide me to help
Regards
Amit

Hi,
For your first scenario,
for a retun po of IC NB type, after creating the PO you need to deliver the same at VL10G. For the delivery system will allow to create the PGR . Prior to these steps you need to return the goods using 161 at MIGO.Please check this 161 stock posted to stock in transit.After PGR system will clear the stock in transit.
Now after claring the stock from transit try cancelling the MIGO 161 document.
For the second query,
Please review your question' When we make return STO from store to DC, ths stocks are issued at DC MAP (condition type P101)
Assume we issue 9 quantity from Store then
Store stock is 9 ea, stock value is (1000-(25*9)) = 775, MAP is 775/1 = 775
This transaction is causing major flactuation in store MAP (100 changed to 775),
Please review the third line.
Regards,

Mapping issue in idoc to JDBC scenario

mapping issue in idoc to JDBC scenario
source structure
E1KNB1M
BUKRS = 1000
E1KNB1M
BUKRS= 9000
E1KNB1M
BUKRS= 2000
THE NODE E1KNB1M is repeated many times and the field BUKRS is also repeated with E1KNB1M as above
TARGET field : ISFRANCHISE
if any where value of BUKRS =9000 we have to pass Y to the target filed, else N
if BUKRS = 9000   THEN ISFRANCHISE= Y
               ELSE
            ISFRANCHISE=N
I've done the mapping as below
BUKRS = 9000--> IF THEN Y ELSE N--
> ISFRANCHISE
BUT everry time the target value is N only
pl suggest
rgds
mojib

mapped like this
BUKRS--->SORT---->
                                             EQUALS --------IF---THEN    Y
9000------------------------>                                               ----------------->ISFRANCHISE
                                                              ELSE   N
context of BUKRS set to parent node
its worked
thanks to all for valuable suggestions
rgds
mojib

Mapping issue - if value matches on of several conditions

Hi champs,
I have a mapping in PI 7.1 of an invoice-xml to a INVOIC02-idoc.
I am mapping the invoice sums to E1EDS01-segments and just want to map five of several qualifiers. So I have set up a mapping for the qualifier field SUMID that just maps those five qualifiers, and map the SUMME-field from inbound message as it is.
Now it shows that our vendors send more than those five qualifiers I have in my mapping. Since I don´t have any control of the SUMME-field all seven values get mapped into the Idoc (generating seven E1EDS01-segments), but only the five segments with my mapped SUMID get the SUMID-field. So I get in total seven E1EDS01 segments in which I get only the SUMME in two of them.
So my question is: Are there any pretty ways to handle this kind of mapping issues besides using a lot of equalS, if and or?
I would like to be able to say (in as simple a function as possible) that if qualifier in field A is X, Y or Z then map the value in field B to SUMME. How do I do that? BTW I am not a java-programmer so advanced java-codes are not a good way for me to handle it.
regards,
Glenn

Write an UDF with this code:
public void <UDFNAME>(String <FieldName>,Container container){
If (<FieldName> == "X" || <FieldName> == "Y" || <FieldName> == "Z"){
return <FieldName>;
Edited by: spantaleoni on Mar 16, 2011 4:04 PM

Mapping issue with context again

I again need help with a mapping issue. I dont know how to handle the contexts to get this working in the xi graphical mapping tool. I have previously logged a question regarding this structure but the requirements have now changed.
I have a source document that has multiple delivery line items and for each delivery line item, there are multiple handling units. Each handling unit contains the line number of the delivery line item it belongs to. This structure has been simplified below.
Source Sample
<DOCUMENT>
<DELIVERY_LINEITEM>
<LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
<MATERIAL>mat 1</MATERIAL>
</DELIVERY_LINEITEM >
<DELIVERY_LINEITEM >
<LINENUMBER>20</LINENUMBER>
<MATERIAL>mat 2</MATERIAL>
</DELIVERY_LINEITEM >
<HANDLING_UNITS>
<HU_LABEL>123</HU_LABEL>
<HU_ITEM>
<LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
</HU_ITEM>
</HANDLING_UNITS>
<HANDLING_UNITS>
<HU_LABEL>456</HU_LABEL>
<HU_ITEM>
<LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
</HU_ITEM>
</HANDLING_UNITS>
<HANDLING_UNITS>
<HU_LABEL>789</HU_LABEL>
<HU_ITEM>
<LINENUMBER>20</LINENUMBER>
</HU_ITEM>
</HANDLING_UNITS>
</DOCUMENT>
Source Structure
DOCUMENT 1..1
DELIVERY_LINEITEM 1..unbounded
LINENUMBER 1..1
MATERIAL 1..1
HANDLING_UNITS 1..unbounded
HU_LABEL 1..1
HU_ITEM 1..1
LINENUMBER 1..1
In the target structure, I need to output each handling unit along with the corresponding DELIVERY_LINEITEM material. Target structure has been simplified below:
Target Sample
<DOCUMENT>
<ROW>
<PACKAGING>
<HU_LABEL>123</HU_LABEL>
</PACKAGING>
<PACKAGING_ITEM>
<LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
<MATERIAL>mat 1</MATERIAL>
</PACKAGING_ITEM>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<PACKAGING>
<HU_LABEL>456</HU_LABEL>
</PACKAGING>
<PACKAGING_ITEM>
<LINENUMBER>10</LINENUMBER>
<MATERIAL>mat 1</MATERIAL>
</PACKAGING_ITEM>
</ROW>
<ROW>
<PACKAGING>
<HU_LABEL>789</HU_LABEL>
</PACKAGING>
<PACKAGING_ITEM>
<LINENUMBER>20</LINENUMBER>
<MATERIAL>mat 2</MATERIAL>
</PACKAGING_ITEM>
</ROW>
</DOCUMENT>
Target Structure
DOCUMENT 1..1
ROW 1..unbounded
PACKAGING 1...1
HU_LABEL 1..1
PACKAGING_ITEM 1..1
LINENUMBER 1..1
MATERIAL 1..1
Note, 1 ROW in the target structure = 1 HANDLING_UNITS from the source structure.
Can anyone help me to achieve this? I do not know how to map the relevant DELIVERY_LINEITEM\MATERIAL from the source structure to the target structure.

JM,
Please find the solution. Reply back if it helps or not
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1045178998&size=o
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1045179010&size=o
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1045179022&size=o
Results :http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1045179134&size=o
Code used:
for(int j=0;j<Handling_Linenum.length;j++)
for(int k=0;k<Delivery_Linenum.length;k++)
if(Handling_Linenum[j].equals(Delivery_Linenum[k]))
result.addValue(""Material[k]"");
result.addContextChange();
Best regards,
raj.

File - XI - Idoc : mapping issue

Hello gurus,
I have a mapping issue:
I have a mapping between FICABillingNotification to FKK_EBS_DOC_TREE
Some fields are mapped one to one, others a mapped to constants.
But for some reason i don't know, not all fields get the right value.
For example:
Working:
Constant 1 --> BEGIN
Constant LS --> RCVPRT (Receiver Partner Type)
Not working:
Constant FILE-->RCVPOR (Receiver Port)
I had an other value the first time i tried it, but now i changed it to FILE but this value is not used by the mapping.
Any help would be welcome
Thanks
Thomas
Edited by: Thomas Pary on May 28, 2008 3:36 PM

This was allready done (sorry i didn't answered that question).
But Ok now i see, that for this RCVPOR the value of the constant "FILE" is mapped, and i can see it in the payload in SXMB_MONI after the mapping. But it isn't populated to the IDoc field :-s
Another problem is, that like the one said above, some of my values are not mapped :
<FICAExternalBilling>
--<DocumentHeader> mapped to EF1KK_EBS_DOC_HEADER
<BillFromId>25001254</BillFromId> mapped to REF_DOC_NUMBER
<PostingDate>20080520</PostingDate> mapped to POST_DATE
<DocumentDate>20080520</DocumentDate> mapped to DOC_DATE
<OriginTypeId>IV</OriginTypeId> mapped to EXT_DOC_TYPE
<ObjectType/>
<ObjectKey/>
<PendingCommitmentGroupID/>
<InvoiceReferenceID/>
<DisputeDocumentReferenceID/>
--</DocumentHeader>
The value of OriginTypeId is not mapped, but the value of DocumentDate and PostingDate are mapped.

Mapping issue: from unbound node to two single fields

Hello,
I have a source message with a node that is 0... unbounded.
The node contains a field named "component_name" with occurence 1..1.
The target message contains only two single fields (component1, component2) and the task is to provide the first two occurences to these fields.
node occ.1
 component <modul beta> -> component1
node occ.2
 component <modul omega> -> component2
We can expect to have any case like these:
node is 0 -> no components provided
node is 1 -> one component provided (usual case) , so second field will be empty
node is 2 -> two components provided
node is > 2 -> need to pick the first two components to provide them to the target fields.
Does anybody here have an idea how to solve this mapping issue?
Your ideas are really welcome!
Best regards
Dirk

Stefan's solution is very good, alternatively, if you are sure that you will always have at least two items you can do
source -> copyValue[0]-> target
source -> copyValue[1]-> target
please note: if you don't have at least two items in your source the copyValue function will throw an exception

Mapping issue: link related items together based on a key

Hi guys,
I have a mapping issue.
I have a source structure like this:
<ad>
<key>
<value1>
</ad>
<ad>
<key2>
<value2>
</ad>
<bx>
<key>
<value3>
</bx>
<bx>
<key2>
<value4>
</bx>
<bx>
<key2>
<value5>
</bx>
I need to get this:
<kitem>
<value1>
<bx>
 <value3>
</bx>
</kitem>
<kitem>
<value2>
<bx>
 <value4>
 <value5>
</bx>
</kitem>
Any idea, how to achieve this?
Thanks,
Olian
Edited by: Olian Saludew on Aug 4, 2009 12:08 PM

Hi,
See the following mapping image:
[http://www.imagenonline.com/img_a162827.gif|http://www.imagenonline.com/img_a162827.gif]
Regards
Ivan

N:M mapping issue

Hello, can any1 please help me with following mapping issue?
Input Msg Type 1 (Items to be grouped)
Item (0..n)
 X (0..1)
 Y (0..1)
 Z (0..1)
 SegmentSub1 (0..n)
 a (0..1)
 b (0..1)
 ChildSegmentWithChilds (0..n)
 a (0..1)
 b (0..1)
 AnotherChildSegmentWithChilds (0..n)
 a (0..1)
 b (0..1)
 SegmentSub2 (0..n)
 a (0..1)
 b (0..1)
Input Msg Type 2 (GroupingCodes)
Group (0..n)
 Code (0..1)
Output Msg Type (Items Grouped by Group codes)
GroupedItems (0..n)
Items (0..n)
 X (0..1)
 Y (0..1)
 Z (0..1)
 SegmentSub1 (0..n)
 a (0..1)
 b (0..1)
 ChildSegmentWithChilds (0..n)
 a (0..1)
 b (0..1)
 AnotherChildSegmentWithChilds (0..n)
 a (0..1)
 b (0..1)
 SegmentSub2 (0..n)
 a (0..1)
 b (0..1)
Mapping logic should be as following;
Item/X = Group/Code. (Items grouping by "X" field for each "Code" value)
any help greatly appreciated,
Thanks!

Okan,
Did you got the solution for this mapping, I'm really sorry for the past one week I was trying to figure it out, finally today I got it, yahoo!!!! I think am bit slow :-(
If you got the solution already no probes, if you haven't kindly follow the below logic.
Source & Target structure
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545133789/
Mapping logic & UDF - Grouped Items
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545133791/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545133801/
Mapping logic & UDF - Item
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545133807/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545133811/
Mapping logic & UDF - x node
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545138911/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545138913/
Mapping logic & UDF - y node
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545138915/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545138917/
Mapping logic & UDF - z node
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545138947/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545138951/
Mapping - Results
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8764045@N06/545005958/
I hope it helps you!!!!
Thanks for the patience.
Best regards,
raj.

Mapping issue - nQSError: 15018

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for