Mapping not using IDocs as source

Hi,
I wish to get some advise from you if it would be possible to do mapping wherein your data are sourced directly from an SAP R/3 table. There is a table that contains all the data needed for your target fields.
In this case, no IDoc is being sent to XI.
Given this scenario, what trigger mechanism would you suggest in order to initiate the mapping? Is it possible to automate the trigger in XI?
Your response is very much appreciated.
Thanks a ton!

Hi Jai,
I agree with you to not connect the SAP databse tables directly. But then without RFC or IDOCs there will not be any option to get the data from SAP tables directly.
Thus I have suggested. But from security point of view this should not be preferred. If the transaction is within the same division or may be in same company then this could be the option.
But ya I don't think there will be any reason to avoid RFC or IDOCs.
As Raj have suggested we could go for own coustomized RFCs.
Thanks for your suggestion
Thanks
Swarup

Similar Messages

CT5760 - virtual-host in parameter-map not used in webauth redirect

Hi all.
I'll try posting my issue here before I post a TAC on this:
Cisco CT5760 wireless controller running IOS-XE version 3.6.0.
This issue is related to web authentication on an SSID with external web portal. It seems that the statement "virtual-host" in "parameter-map type webauth global" is not used as intended. I'll try to explain:
When a user connects to an SSID with external web authentication enabled and the user opens a web browser, the user will get redirected to the external web portal for authentication. In this redirect URL we see the parameter "switch_url=http://1.2.3.4/login.html". The IP address 1.2.3.4 is, in this example, our virtual IP. But we have also configured "virtual-host" to be webauth.example.com. And in my opinion the "switch_url" parameter should be "switch_url=http://webauth.example.com/login.html". This is how it works on our old Cisco WiSM1 implementation.
The reason why this is a problem is that the clients web browser will not accept the certificate installed on "http://1.2.3.4" because it is not issued with that IP address, only the hostname webauth.example.com. I know that it is possible to get certificates issued with an IP address (as long as it's not an RFC1918 IP address), but rumors say that many Certificate Authorities will stop issuing these soon, even with "real IPs". Therefore it is important that the redirect URL gets corrected.
Does anyone disagree with me that this is a bug?

Hi and thank you for your response.
I feel that I need to clarify a few things. Here is my parameter-map config (a bit edited):
parameter-map type webauth global
virtual-ip ipv4 1.1.1.1 virtual-host webauth.example.com
intercept-https-enable
parameter-map type webauth webauth_external
type webauth
redirect for-login https://webauth-external.example.com/v2/login.html
redirect portal ipv4 x.x.x.x
So the problem here is that a web browser of the client gets the following redirect URL:
https://webauth-external.example.com/v2/login.html?switch_url=https://1.1.1.1/login.html&redirect=http://www.cnn.com
Then after a successful login on the external portal, the user gets redirected back to https://1.1.1.1/login.html. Here is the core of my problem. I think that the parameter "switch_url" should be with the name webauth.example.com since I configured it as the "virtual-host". This is the behavior we see with our old Cisco WiSM1.
When the redirect goes to https://1.1.1.1/login.html the client complains about the certificate, because it is not issued to that IP address but to the hostname.
I can verify that the client does not complain about this if I manually edit the redirect URL on the client to the following:
https://webauth-external.example.com/v2/login.html?switch_url=https://webauth.example.com/login.html&redirect=http://www.cnn.com
Then the redirect after authentication goes to https://webauth.example.com/login.html and the client accepts the certificate and everything is peachy.
Do you see my problem? And yes, the virtual IP resolves to the name in DNS.

Header mapping while using IDoc as receiver communication

Hi All,
Can any one brief me with header mapping while configuring receiver determination when IDoc is used for receiver communication.
Thanks,
Govindu.

Hi,
To change the Partner Type( SNDPRT and RCVPRT ), you use Header mapping in the receiver agreement.
If you use APPLY CONTROL RECORD FROM PAYLOAD, the following values are filled from tha payload,
MESCOD
MESCFT
TEST
EXPRSS
STD
STDVRS
STDMES
SNDSAD
SNDLAD
RCVSAD
RCVLAD
REFINT
REFGRP
REFMES
STATUS
DIRECT
OUTMOD
CREDAT
CRETIM
Take sender from payload and take receiver from payload, are used to change the value of SNPRN and RCVPRN.
Regards,
Bhavesh

E71: Why does Google Maps not use GPS and track my...

Why is it that Google maps only gives me a GPS signal accurate to 60-2000m. (depending on where I am)
Nokia Maps 2.0 would follow me down roads and footpaths, but Google maps just gives a rough approximation inside a large circle. My friend had an N95 Black and now an N97, and has testified to the exact same problem.
If I could get Google Maps to work with my GPS I would probably delete Nokia Maps, as it is otherwise mostly inferior.
(I've gone through the laborious process to download Maps 3.0 and it is pretty rubbish to be honest - big, bloated with inferior maps)
Message Edited by alexjholland on 24-Aug-2009 05:07 PM

Google Maps can be set to use your GPS if your phone is equipped with it.
Simply run Google Maps...
Options > Tools > Use GPS (check it or uncheck it for on and off, it toggles)
Current version is 3.2.0 which supports layers and Latitude.
The good thing is that it will get a cell tower lock (where supported) first before it establishes a satellite lock so you get a position, albeit approximate, faster.
You can tell it has established satellite lock when a small box on the top right corner of your app shows you "GPS active (x)" where x = number of satellites locked.
Unfortunately, it does not seem to support the magnetometer on the newer phones yet for compass heading.
Good luck.
Message Edited by mouserider on 25-Aug-2009 07:53 AM

[Nokia N8] Ovi Maps NOT using GPRS data

I recently updated the my Nokia N8 software to PR1.1
I had used Ovi Maps before and it was working properly. The GPRS data was being utilized for positioning. But after updating the software, the counter at the bottom remains 0.0kb and shows "Not connected symbol"
Here is the screenshots:
Other configuration:
http://i52.tinypic.com/mvg2nq.jpg
http://i52.tinypic.com/kci7o8.jpg
http://i54.tinypic.com/14nzfw2.jpg
http://i56.tinypic.com/29yp47d.jpg
http://i53.tinypic.com/2vtw7yc.jpg
http://i53.tinypic.com/15wnomt.jpg
Please help
Solved!
Go to Solution.

farby wrote:
A bit off track.. but can you browse internet thru' your phone.. ? Just to confirm that the Access Point settings haven't been disturbed..as all the settings / configuration for the Maps applications seems to be OK to use the GPRS data..
. Even I had the same thought at first, so I already checked it before I sharted the topic and I even checked now just to be sure.
Yes, I CAN browse the internet, both with the Default browser AND with Opera Mobile.
Also, after I browse the net, I can confirm the data usage in the logs for each session.
But, when I use Ovi Maps, the session for "Vodafone live!" does exist in the log but the usage is 0kB (U/D).
aspergerguy wrote:
@RCL0000ZK
Any particular reason for not upgrading OVI Maps to v3.06_10wk46 on your N8 as OVI Suite has been delivering this version for quite a while?
Here at my side, that update just doesn't show up in Ovi Suite.
I only see "Real Golf 2011" in the Install Device Application section of Ovi Suite.
Just to make sure, is this what you mean?

Hi Using IDOCs with LSM Workbench????

Hello,
I wanted to use IDOCs as one of the methods with the LSM Workbench. I am going to load the data from flat file to a transaction in CRM. I am just curious to know that how do I go forward with it. The first step of LSM Workbench is asking Message Type, Basic Type, Enhancement and structure assignment for EDIDC40. I have used other methods such as Direct input and Batch input. I have not used IDOCs with LSMW. Is it possible that you can give me the steps what we have to follow in order to set up the IDOCs and then use it with LSMW.
I will really appreciate if you can give me the steps or give a link which shows steps of LSMW with IDOCs..
Thanks much.
Warren

hi warren,
   first u have to configure the partner profile in lsmw
lsmw->settings->idoc inbound processing.
then u have to choose the basic type message type all those stuffs.if u have any enhacement u can use it or else leave it blank.
lsmw->settings->idoc inbound processing.
partner profile..
File port              IDOC_TEST
tRFC port
Partn.type             KU
Partn.number           106
Message type         ORDERS        Purchase order / or
Basic type           ORDERS05      Purchasing/Sales
enhancement blank
    tick it. Enable structure relation for EDIDC40
steps are:
Maintain object attributes
Maintain source structures
Maintain source fields
Maintain structure relations
Maintain field mapping and conversion rules
Maintain fixed values, translations, user-define
Specify files
Assign files
Read data
Display read data
Convert data
Display converted data
Start IDoc creation
Start IDoc processing
Create IDoc overview
Start IDoc post-processing
please don't forget to reward points....
regards,
murali.

Message mapping issue in idoc to jdbc scenario

We have a scenario of idoc->XI-JDBC
the below given segment may get repeated , as shown below ,
E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
   QUALF---003
   IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
   QUALF---003
   IDTNR---20500000000034(EAN No)
Reqd mapping
if QUALF=003
THEN IDTNR----->Bar_code_Number_EAN
Now IDTNR has to be mapped with Bar_code_Number_EAN for the segment which comes last
Pl suggest how to map using graphical mapping for the above scenario.

Hi Raj ,
The current mapping works fine if the parent segment E1EDP01 is only one but if that gets repeated then the last value of IDTNR is getting populated in the target side, very clearly i m giving the source and target structure and the mapping done using the UDF
Source structure
E1EDP01
       E1EDP19[1]--idoc segment
              QUALF---002
              IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
       E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
              QUALF---003
              IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
       E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
           QUALF---003
           IDTNR---20500000000030(EAN No)
E1EDP01
     E1EDP19[1]--idoc segment
                QUALF---002
                IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
     E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
               QUALF---003
               IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
      E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
             QUALF---003
             IDTNR---20500000000031(EAN No)
E1EDP01
       E1EDP19[1]--idoc segment
               QUALF---002
                IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
      E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
              QUALF---003
              IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
     E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
          QUALF---003
          IDTNR---20500000000032(EAN No)
Target mapping
if QUALF=002
THEN IDTNR--->Article_No this is the direct mapping so , no issues
if QUALF=003
THEN IDTNR----->Bar_code_Number_EAN, now this IDTNR should get repeated every time the segment E1EDP01 gets repeated , currently only the last value form all the IDTNR is coming to the target side.
The current mapping works fine if the parent segment E1EDP01 is only one
Target structure
Access1
IDTNR--> Bar_code_Number_EAN( value is 20500000000030)
Access2
IDTNR--> Bar_code_Number_EAN( value is 20500000000031)
Access3
IDTNR--> Bar_code_Number_EAN( value is 20500000000032)
Current mapping
If QUALF = 003
                Then QUALF ---->
                                                 mapBarCodeEAN---->Bar_code_Num_EAN
If QUALF = 003
                Then IDTNR ---->
Context of QUALF is set to E1EDP01
Context of IDTNR is set to E1EDP01
thanks for your personalised help
rgds
mojib
Edited by: mohammad mojib ur rahman on Apr 9, 2010 1:30 PM

JDBC to Idoc mapping - create multiple Idocs from 1 JDBC input

I am importing data using JDBC and I want to put the data in an IDoc on a SAP system. my data is about 100,000 rows, but my Idoc (ZIDOC) is defined as 1-35,000 for the segments. I have followed Ossnote 814393, and also set up my Interface Mapping to use my JDBC source and the Idoc as the target. In my Message Mapping, i use the source as my JDBC Message Type, and the target is my External Definition Idoc (changed to be 1 to unbounded).
My incoming JDBC mapping is:
JDBCinput     (1:1)
-row            (0...Unbounded)
      -part        (1:1)
      -unit        (1:1)
      -type       (1:1)
my outgoing Idoc (from external definition) is:
ZIDOC           (1:1)
-IDOC          (1...Unbounded)
     -Begin       (required)
     -EDI_DC40 (1:1)
     -Zsegment   (1...35,000)
        -part        (1:1)
        -unit        (1:1)
        -type       (1:1)
I currently map JDBCinput = ZIDOC and IDOC, row = Zsegment, and the rest of the rows match.
When I use this mapping, my first 35,000 rows from my JDBC input gets mapped to ZIDOC with 35,000 segments, but the remaining 65,00 rows from my JDBC input just seem to be lost, as only this one ZIDOC is created. I would expect to see 3 Idocs created, 2 with 35,000 segments each, and the 3rd Idoc created with 30,000 segments.
Does anyone know what I need to change to get this mapping to work and create the extra needed Idocs? Can this be done with out using a BPM?
Any guidance?
Thanks
Jake

HI,
Just try out with context change and check if it works
In this type of case, it is easy to use Java mapping so that you can generate target structures as you like.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
moorthy

Jdeveloper using containers data-sources

Hi,
Could some one please help me. I developed an application in jdeveloper using BC4J. It uses jdevelopers database connections. I deployed it to a remote 9iAS Application server. Now, i want the application to use containers data-sources instead of using jdev's format. I configured data-sources in the container, defined resource reference mapping for this application but still it seems to be not using containers data-sources.
Any one of you have any ideas please?
Thanks,
Kavitha

Repost

Mapping Issue: Target IDoc structure not getting created properly

Hi Experts,
I am stuck with a strange problem in my mapping. It is a M:N scenario mapping where we have multiple IDocs in source as well as in target.
For example, in source Queue-1 I am getting values as [SUPPRESS, true, true, true, true] and in the in source Queue-2 I am getting the values as [1,2,3,4,5]. I used MapWithDefault function to match the number of values in both the queues but in the target IDoc the node (say TMPN) is created only 4 times because of the condition put at the target node. So, the target node should have values as [1,2,3,4] but it gets values as [2,3,4,5] because the first target TMPN node is not created in the first target IDoc. I can provide you with the skeleton of the map. Hope this will give you a fair idea. Let me know if you require more details.
1. Target Structure:
    IDoc - No TMPN Node
    IDoc - 1 TMPN Node
    IDoc - 2 TMPN nodes
    IDoc - 1 TMPN node
Condition put on target TMPN_Node ---> (created only 4 times due to condition)
2. Mapping Skeleton:
Values coming from Q1 (SUPPRESS, true, true, true, true) --->
                                                                                \===>FORMATBYEXAMPLE+SPLITBYVALUE==> TMPN-F0 [2]
                                                                                /                                                                              TMPN-F0 [3]
Values coming from Q2 (1,2,3,4,5) -
>                                                                               TMPN-F0 [4]
                                                                                TMPN-F0 [5]
Where F0 is the field which is created when TMPN Node is created. So, if TMPN gets created 6 times, the F0 gets created 6 times.
Please let me know if there is an alternative to this problem. How can I have values as [1,2,3,4] in field F0 instead of [2,3,4,5]

hi,
i got the email.
as i can see your mapping seams to be rigth, but there is sometrhing i dont get. in a previuos post you said:
I am stuck with a strange problem in my mapping. It is a M:N scenario mapping where we have multiple IDocs in source as well as in target.
For example, in source Queue-1 I am getting values as SUPPRESS, true, true, true, true and in the in source Queue-2 I am getting the values as 1,2,3,4,5. I used MapWithDefault function to match the number of values in both the queues but in the target IDoc the node (say TMPN) is created only 4 times because of the condition put at the target node. So, the target node should have values as 1,2,3,4 but it gets values as 2,3,4,5 because the first target TMPN node is not created in the first target IDoc. I can provide you with the skeleton of the map. Hope this will give you a fair idea. Let me know if you require more details.
1. Target Structure:
IDoc - No TMPN Node
IDoc - 1 TMPN Node
IDoc - 2 TMPN nodes
IDoc - 1 TMPN node
lets asume you define as default value "1"
now, the result of the formatByExample taking the example you sent to me is:
1,T1,T2,T3,T4 without context change. and the result of the function splitByValue should be what you are specting.
but its something that is not clear still,
could you post the result of the mapWithDefault? i think your problem is there.
Rgds
RP-.

Problem in mapping while using Do not Use SOAP Envelope

Hi All,
This is wrt my thread 'Removing and adding SOAP Envelope'
I am currently working on SOAP-XI-Proxy Scenario.
For some un avoiadable reason, I had to use the option 'DO not use SOAP Envelope' .So the SOAP Envelope came withen the payload and in the pipeline, I can see the payload prefixed by '<?xml version="1.0" ?>' .
Now my payload looks like
<?xml version="1.0" ?> ( no more the encoding="utf-8" notation is there)
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
 xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<soapenv:Body>
<Complaint_Request xmlns="urn:******createserviceticket">
<CaseNo>12345</CaseNo>
<CustomerNo>12345</CustomerNo>
</Complaint_Request>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
To accomodate the change, I also changed my request structure as
<Complaint_Request> (My new message Type)
 <Envelope>
 <Body>
 <Complaint_Request> (My previous message Type)
 <caseNo>
 <CustomerNo>
But I am facing problem in mapping the values to the target structure (which is a flat structure),
as the payload doesnot start with ' ns1: ' notation any more . Even XSLT mapping is not working.
When I am pasting the payload in the Testing Mapping Editor, the Source Node are correctly
formed, but all come in RED . But as the root node , ie 'ns0' is not there, the value
from child nodes are not getting mapped to the target fields.
Regards,
Subhendu

Hi Joel,
SAP says, when we use the option 'DO Not Use SOAP Envelope', the payload also contains the SOAP
Envelope. So it is obvious that the payload wont start with 'ns0' notation.
So I am searching for a solution, when we use that option.
Regards,
Subhendu

Mapping to an IDOC using an externally created XSL file

I want to map a message to an IDoc using an ABAP XSLT transform. I am creating the XSLT in an external tool.
I need to use an XSD definition of the IDOC as the target document of the mapping. I can get that in two ways:
1) Get the XSD definition of the IDOC from transaction WE60 and use the menu command 'Documentation -> XML Schema'
2) In the Integration Repository, export the XSD of the imported IDOC.
The problem is, there are significant syntax differences between these versions, and I don't know which is the correct version. For instance, the XSD exported from the Integration Repository has a mandatory attribute 'SEGMENT' for each segment that must be filled to create a valid XML message; this is not the case when the XSD definition is created in WE60.
Can somebody advise which is the correct version to use?

Hi Anthony,
This is really strange...
In both case XSD should be same...can you please tell for which idoc you are generating xsd?
Eventhough if you generate XML Schema using WE60, mandatory attribute 'SEGMENT' for each segment has to be there....this validation would be done while posting idoc. It will check for all mandatory fields.
I have some different thoughts that what wojciech has suggested...
"If were your shoes I would use xsd from integration repository because that's the expected result...."
But final goal is not to achieve mapping but posting idoc with proper data in R/3 system successfully.
Your second question..
"Do I assume then that placing a constant value of 1 in the SEGMENT attribute is just to satisfy the validation of the XML message against the XSD:..?
ummm...I think if you assign constant "1" to segment it will generate that segment while creating idoc. Its mandatory to assign constant value to segment which you want to generate...
"Can I assume that the IDoc adapter will fill the SEGMENT attribute with the correct value?.."
I dont think so Idoc adapter will fill this attribute automatically...you need to assign constant to field segment.
Nilesh

In Idoc bundling ...message mapping not found

Hi XI Friends..
In my File to Idoc scenario..i want to send multiple IDOCs from the XI without a BPM .
I am following blog by Michal.
<a href="///people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change:///people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
I have xsd for source ..so i created one external definition .and message interface for outbound.
following the above blog by michal..
i imported idoc ..and i exported that idoc into xsd and i changed the occurance of idoc to unbounded and again imported as external definition.
i created the message mapping between these two external definitions.and tested ..
As in michal 's blog..
In Interface mapping..i given source and target interface as standard idoc.and clicked on Read interface then i am not finding the message mapping created in previous step..
i refreshed cache also..
please guide me.....
regards
ram

Hi bavesh...
thank you so much for very your quick responses..
i got xsd as source..based on xsd i created external definition for source xsd and i created outbound interface based on source external deifinition MI_OUT_WearUnits.
and i imported Idoc and exported as xsd and changed occurance to unbounded and again imported as external definition.
i did mapping between these two external definitions.
and i selected standard idoc for source and target interface for interface mapping and given message mapping of previous step.
In ID
sender agreement :
 sender service :BS_external
 sender interface :MI_OUT_WearUnits
receiver agreement:
 receiver service :R/3
 receiver interface : standard Idoc
Interface determination:
sender service :BS_external
sender interface :MI_OUT_WearUnits
reciever service :R/3
and clicked create
inbound interface : Standard IDOc
i am not getting Interface mapping which i created in IR.
i tried Enhance interface determination also..
please guide me....
waiting for your help.
regards
ram

IDOC Serialization(EOIO) using IDOC Adapter throwing Mapping error

Hello SDN Gurus,
The scenario I am working on is IDOC(PAYEXT & EUPEXR) --> XI (ABAP Mapping) --> Flat File (IDOC Structure).
The IDOCS produced in Appl system may be in the following order
PAYEXT
PAYEXT
EUPEXR
PAYEXT
PAYEXT
PAYEXT
EUPEXR
I need them to be processed in the same order into flat file.
The scenario is working good except for the serialization. So I did the following
Created two entries in IDXQUEUE one for each message type with the same Queue name in XI system.
Created a new rule for the queue and an associated function module. Used this rule in partner profile for both the message types. I used the following link to create the above two steps.
/people/community.user/blog/2006/11/04/how-to-serialize-idoc-xml-messages-fed-into-xi
The SAP system in based on WAS 6.4.
I can see the queue name & EOIO in the inbound message header.
I am getting a mapping error in ABAP program. If I inactivate the queue(in Appl system SAP ECC), I don't get any error.
Does anybody had this problem earlier? Please advice.
Thanks
Srini Vaidyam

I found an OSS note to resolve my issue. The note number is 1057573.
Whenever the queue is activated, the sender system will not send the <TABNAM> field value in EDI_DC40 structure. This note addresses this problem.
I found out this by comparing the results from SXI_MAPPING_TEST individually for the message that failed after queue is activated and the message that was successful if the queue is inactivated.
Only thing I noticed now is even if you selected the radio button "Trasfer Immediately" in Partner profile of Appl. system, the messages are not sent. They are getting collected. So we need to manually push them out using WE14.
This forum Rocks.
Thanks.
Srini Vaidyam

Mapping not sufficiently defined FILE TO IDOC(HRMD_A.HRMD_A06) scenerio

Hello friends,
In message mapping part from File to IDOC. I am doing mapping of infotype 14 message type with the corresponding idoc. But when I activate it I am getting the following error:
Activation of the change list canceled Check result for Message Mapping MM_INF14_LS | urn:tcs:test: Mapping not sufficiently defined
As far as I know I have properly mapped the fields which I am picking from the file. But I am not very sure what to do woth few fields in the IDOC which appear to be red in message mapping
Kindly give me the solution.
Regards,
Lokesh

Thanx guys...I tried changing the description of other mappings whch were already activated. And thn I tried activating I got the same error:
Activation of the change list canceled Check result for Message Mapping MM_02IT | urn:tcs:payroll: Starting compilation Source code has syntax error: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/sun/tools/javac/Main Exception in thread "main"
what possibly can go wrong? Is there any way to activate it.
Looking forward for ur reply.
Regards,
Lokesh

Mapping not using IDocs as source

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for