Mapping of Quality System (Source System) after the Transport

Hi,
We have two quality source systems like 300,400 in sync with the development ,to extract the data . I am transporting Transfer rule mapping from the development .After the transport to Quality , the changes are reflected in 300 . But I want to change it from 300 to 400 i.e.Transfer rule mapping should be reflected in 400. What is the transaction code used to change this mapping in BW System?
Thanks for your time.
Thanks & Regards,
Raja

Raja,
When you transport - you have a transport mapping in your dev system that tells BI which system connects to which system in the QA system for instance
FLAT_FILE in DEV could be Z_FLATFILE in QA - accordingly the datasources are mapped. Also the transfer rules are source system specific which means that you change the source system - the transfer rules will have to be recreated.
Instead what I am asking you is to maintain the mappings for client 400 in DEV and then maintain the mappings as 400 - 400 in the qa system and then transport the same. If your dev systems are linked to QA300 and your mapping says QA400 the same will hold good.. however if you have QA300 in dev to be sent to QA as QA300 and then change the source system .. it will not work since this will be seen as a source system change and you cannot change the same. You could try BDLS and try changing the logical client name ( I am not sure if it is BDLS ) or change the RFC connection parameters in SM59 but am not sure if it would work....

Similar Messages

"Conversion of Source System names after the transport" : O

Experts:
Environment : BI 7.0 and SP 12
<b>Tranports related to transformation rules are failing with inactive status...</b>
Further investigation on this, I have noticed that in our QA system, where "Conversion of Source System names after the transport" : O screen, we have columns
Original Source System, Target Source System, 7.0, Description(I guess, since no name is found)
Everything looks fine to me with reference to actual techinical names of source/target system...
My question there is a check box on column "7.0", which is UNCHECKED. Is this correct?
My understanding is that, this check box needs to be CHECKED, since this is related " Only Valid for RSDS, TRFN and DTPA Objects ". Is this correct?
If yes, Can I check this box in QA system, save and retransport my requests. If so, what happens to standard BW objects i.e., transfer ruels, update rules etc...
OR do i need to create another entry with same source/target system and check the 7.0 box.
OR do i need to create 3 entries with same source/target system and check 7.0 box for each entry i.e., RSDS, TRFN, DTPA.
Finally, please advise the exact steps that need to be taken here...pros and cons
Your inputs will be of great help....
Thanks,
BI
Message was edited by:
B I

Hi,
Yes you need to check the checkbox as it is related to Data sources and transformation and DTPs. you can mark the check box if your client is modifiable, if not you need to transport the setting from DEV. Go to
SPRO > Business Intelligence>Transport Settings--> Change Source system name after transport.
you also need to maintain the Source system IDs .
Hope it helps.

Warning: Failed to clean up the source mailbox after the move

Hi!
After moving a mailbox between databases (EMC or EMS), there is a warning: Warning: Failed to clean up the source mailbox after the move. Erro details: MapiExceptionUnexpectedMailboxState: Unable to delete mailbox. (hr=0x80004005, ec=2634).
Users can successfully access mailboxes, but these mailboxes stay in disconected mailbox node on EMC, and it is shown on EMS afer command [PS] C:\> Get-MailboxDatabase | Get-MailboxStatistics | where {$_.DisconnectReason -ne $null} and their databases are
the old ones.
We have recently upgraded from SP2 to SP2 RU4, but we´re not sure when this problem started.
Our Environment:
Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise SP1
Windows Roles: File Services, Web Server (IIS)
Exchange Server 14.02.0318.001 (Build 247.5) Roles MBX, DAG with one more MBX identical Server
Antivirus: Forefront Endpoint Protection Version: 2.1.1116.0
Virtualization: Yes – Hyper-V
Applications: Backup Agent CA, SCCM Agent, SCOM Agent, HP Management Tools
Any idea?
Thankyou in advance!
Fabio Martins MCDST/MCSA Brasil!!!

I recently upgraded our Exchange 2010 servers (CAS/HUB and MBX) from SP1 to SP3 RU6 and now I'm encountering this issue when doing mailbox moves. I opened a support case with Microsoft and it appears that they are aware that SP 3 RU1 doesn't fix
the issue in all cases. Below is the response I received from the support engineer.
=====
Based on my research and case experience, we have several customers report that even if they are running Exchange 2010 SP3 RU1 or later version(for example, one of customer is running Exchange 2010 SP3 RU4 and another is also in CU6 environment), they also
have such issue. When they move mailbox, it completed with warning message that source mailbox can’t be cleaned up after the mailbox move operation. This issue occurs because the Mailbox Replication service does not check a certain flag when you move the mailbox.
Additionally, a move process for a mailbox that fails takes 30 seconds by default. When a move process for a mailbox fails, the Mailbox Replication service tries five more times to move the mailbox. Therefore, there is a 2.5 minute delay for each mailbox move
process when you move many mailboxes at the same time.
Currently, the workaround is to remove the “SoftDeleted” mailboxes manually after move the mailbox using the command you shared to us.
==========================================
1. List all disconnected mailboxes in a database and display DisconnectReason if its SoftDeleted or Disabled
Get-MailboxStatistics -Database "DB9" | Where-Object {$_.DisconnectDate -Notlike $NULL} | Format-Table DisplayName, DisconnectDate, MailboxGuid, DisconnectReason –Wrap
2. Remove a specific softdeleted mailbox
Remove-StoreMailbox -database “DB9” -identity “User Alias here” -MailboxState SoftDeleted
==========================================
And as I know, it has no impact on the mailbox usage, so we can ignore the warning message currently. Please rest assured that once we got more information about the issue, we will inform you ASAP.

REG:After the transport of the DC to QA Server for PI Webservices.

Dear All,
Currently we are working on a project where we connect to the DB through PI Webservices ,we have used the "Import through Webservice model" to create the models and then we have Developed the DC and transported it to the QA but, even after the transport it points to the Dev PI and not to the QA PI as the url in the Traget link holds the destination of the DEV server .How can we make the DC point to the QA server after transport without changing any thing at the application level.
Request you to help us at the earliest.
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Nishita Salver

You can try using SDM substitution variables.

Process Chain triggers Automatically after the Transport

Hello There,
I have a Process chain setup to load Transaction Data and the infopackets are set to "Immediate Start"..
When I transport these to Test environment, they are getting executed immediately after the transport..
Just wondering ,, this is what it intended to do.. because I don't want to run them after the transport.. is it something I am missing anything here ??
Your comments are much appreciated..
Thanks
Mavi

Mavi,
Once you click delete and save. The schedule is deleted. You could view via Maintain Start Variant -> Direct Scheduling button.
You will noticed that there is nothing schedule i.e. all tabs (immediate, specific datetime, etc) are not scheduled.
Answering to your question on modifiable in Test and Production box :
All you have to do is go to RSA1 -> Transport Connection -> Object Changeability -> Change the Process Chain objects to Changeable -> Save.
And you are done i.e. you could change the scheduling of the RSPC in Test and Production.
Remember to assign the point to the solution provided...:-)
Thanks.
Regards,
Lye

Mapping of objects from source system to BW

Hi Experts,
Here is a problem in my source system I declared objects as ZTECHNICAL but while defining in BW as it will not accpet more than 9 characters so I named it as ZTECNICAL here does it matter for the mapping of the object to ZTECHNICAL to ZTECNICAL.
ZTECHNICAL IN SOURCE SYSTEM
ZTECNICAL IN BW.
Thanks in Advance.
Vassu.

Hi Vasu,
It deos not matter as long as you map the same info-object to the same fields from the source system.
For example Company Code BUKRS in R/3 is always mapped to 0COMP_CODE info-object in BW.
No issue. Go ahead.
Bye
Dinesh

SC not in the sourcing cockpit after the follow-on document is deleted

HI,
    In sourcing cockpit , I created a contract by SC , but I deleted the contract , the SC didn't appear in sourcing cockpit. the SOURCE_REL_IND still is 'Y',    I have no way to create new contract by the SC .
   I don't know if it is the standard functionatity, It seem to be not reasonable.
Please tell me the solution that SC can be back to sourcing cockpit automatiocally.
even if I carry out the BBP_GET_STATUS_2. it still don't work.
   Thanks a lot.
Jesse

Hi
the rule is below
sc created 2 qty -- PO created 2 qty -PO deleted - now order quantity and PO quantity difference is there so now SC comes to cockpit and this shopping cart item needs to sourced and PO needs be created.
i did not test below scenario.
SC CREATED - contract or Bid invitation created and now Contract / bid invitation deleted and now you are expecting this sc item comes to cockpit.
Note 1068497 - BBPSC04: Incorrect status for items completed in sourcing
Symptom
You create a shopping cart which is sent to sourcing cockpit. You create a follow-on document. For eg: Bid invitation. You delete the same and complete the item in sourcing. The status of the item in check status is shown as 'Approved' instead of 'Cannot be ordered'.
As per the above note sap rule, even though Bid Invitation deleted and reference shopping cart must venture to cockpit to create another follow on document.in your case SOURCE_REL_IND = Y instead of X. What is the item status of sc after contract / po deleted?

I can't accessed system recovery options after the repairing process was interrupted.

although it's not my PC, i'm still concern about it (it's actually a public computer in our library). I actually tried to repair it using the system recovery options of windows 7 with thinkvantage technoliogies but i interrupt it because maybe someone will caught me and i will be mistakenly be liable. and the result is after i restared it, it restarts over and over again, with BSOD appearing for a split second. i tried to use disable autorestart on system failure feature, and i saw the BSOD. but the real issue is i can't go through the recovery options, only until the part when i'm asked to select a keyboard input method, then the next part is this message: "You must log in to access System Recovery Options. If you are having trouble logging in, please contact your computer administrator for assistance. Click OK to restart the computer." anyway, this is the BSOD says:
A problem has been detected and windows has been shut down to prevent damage to your computer.
If this is the first time you've seen this stop error screen, restart your computer. If this screen appears again, follow these steps:
Disable or uninstall any anti-virus disk defragmentation or backup utilities. Check your hard drive configuration, and check for any updated drivers. Run CHKDSK /F to check for hard drive corruption, and then restart your computer.
Technical in formation:
*** STOP: 0x00000024 (0x00000000001904, 0xFFFFFA800690D840, 0XFFFFFFFFC0000102, 0x0000000000000000)
I hope this problem will be solved as much as possible. thank you in advance. and i also don't know what model of this Lenovo all-in-one PC is. but i think this is 3318F9U, and its i forgot its BIOS version, and i don't know how to access it. and also, i'm not sure if there's a preloaded Superfish in this all-in-one PC, maybe the vulnerability started it. because i recently read an article regarding the Superfish's vulnerability.

Hello and welcome,
Please remeber that this is a peer-to-peer forum (users helping each other) not the Lenovo support site. There is some Lenovo presence, but if you need urgent support, please try your local support office:
Philippines
THINK-branded products
Tagalog, English
1-800-8908-6454 (GLOBE subscribers), 1-800-1441-0719 (PLDT subscribers)
Z.
The large print: please read the Community Participation Rules before posting. Include as much information as possible: model, machine type, operating system, and a descriptive subject line. Do not include personal information: serial number, telephone number, email address, etc. The fine print: I do not work for, nor do I speak for Lenovo. Unsolicited private messages will be ignored. ... GeezBlog
English Community Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество

Why is my samsung monitor quality is so poor after the lastest os update?

I recently updated my mac pro and the monitor qulity just turned very poor on me
all the options seems to be gone now
the text qulity is very poor
and the colour is also very poor.
everything was fine before the update what happened?

Hi julianju,
If you are having issues with the image quality on your external display after a recent OS update, you may find the following article helpful:
Apple computers: Troubleshooting issues with video on internal or external displays
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1573
Regards,
- Brenden

BI 7.01 SP06 Software Requirements for Backend System (Source System) ECC6

Hello,
We currently have a NW BI 7.0 SP18 system and an ECC 6.0 SP17 system.
We are looking into upgrading our BI 7.0 to a BI 7.0 EhP 1 SP06.
I've been searching for information on any Software requirements for the ECC 6.0 system to make sure it's compatible with the BI 7.0 EhP1 system.
My question is :
Our ECC 6.0 is @ SP 17, which is equivalent to ECC 6.0 EhP 4 SPS 03.
As a prerequisite for BI 7.0 EhP1 I've read ECC6.0 needs to be at EhP4.
1). Is it adequet to have Support Packs equivalent to EhP4?(SP17)
Or do I need to actually apply EhP4 on the ECC 6.0 system?
2). What is the requirement from a PI & PI-Basis prespective on the ECC 6.0 system, for it to work with BI 7.0 EhP 1 SP06?
Our ECC 6.0 currently has PI_Basis 2005_1_700 SP 17.
Where can I fiind information on this?
Any insight would be appreciated.
Thank you.

As a prerequisite for BI 7.0 EhP1 I've read ECC6.0 needs to be at EhP4.
1). Is it adequet to have Support Packs equivalent to EhP4?(SP17)
Or do I need to actually apply EhP4 on the ECC 6.0 system?
If its a prerequisite then you have to apply it. When we upgraded our systems we upgraded both ECC and BI to EhP4/NW EhP1 and EhP1 respectively.
2). What is the requirement from a PI & PI-Basis prespective on the ECC 6.0 system, for it to work with BI 7.0 EhP 1 SP06?
Our ECC 6.0 currently has PI_Basis 2005_1_700 SP 17.
PI_Basis on both the systems will be 7.01 as they are upgraded as part of NW EhP1. You have to use Maintenance Optimizer for downloading EhP's which will take care of all the dependencies.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Naveed

Assignment of Source System in quality after transport

Hi Experts,
We have implemented the Inventory management standard flow in Development,
Now to tell you, we have multiple landscape over here,
Depending on the project, and the fesiblility for the client, the tranport layer is been decided,
But for sure we have multiple source system,
By multiple source system, i mean not the other components like R/3, SRM or APO,
but for R/3 itself we have multiple boxes at each layer,
Now when transported to quality,
the standard objects are reflecting after few errors corrected and re transports,
But the source system which it has picked for the BF BX and UM datasource is not that i require according to the transports landing for the R/3 developments,
AT DEVELOPMENT LAYER,
BW development is GDA, which is having the source system connection to development R/3 (GD0),
AT QUALITY
We have BW as EQ3,
For R/3 we have EQ0 and NR0,
All the transports have reached in the respective target quality system,
But the data sources are having source system connection to NR0 and not EQ0,
I want it to be EQ0 as the data lies over there.
How do i resolve this ?
Thanks and should be appricated for your efforts in helping.

Hi Daljeet,
You should set the Source system Conversion option in Transport Connection before Transporting the objects to QA and PRD.
You can do this using the button 'Conversion' next to the button 'Source System Assignment'. Here you can specify the Target source system name after the Transport.
If you want to change all the assignments from NR0 to EQ0, this article will be helpful for you.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/805eefcd-5428-2d10-c0ab-dc27a95b2c81
Get the help of your BASIS team also.
Refer this thread.
Re: source system in RSA1 is diiferent to the datasource in infoprovider

Source System mapping for BW configuration transport

I create a data model mapped to the testing source system i.e DEV201 but the configuration source system is DEV200.
Now i am about to transport the BW configuration to BW-QAS , I am wondering if I have to assign the data model to the config. source system(DEV200) or i can created a transport request attached to DEV201 ?
Is there any concern on this ?

Hi,
I'm not clear your system landscape. Do system landscape like that:
BWD (BW development) --> DEV201
Now you want transport all objects to BW_QAS with connected to DEV200.
If this is true, you do like this:
- On BW_QAS: create source system (DEV200). Maintain conversion of source system after transport (Original: DEV201; Target source system: DEV200).
- After that transport your modeling from BWD to BW_QAS.
Hope this helps
BR
TRUC

Source system mapping for transport

We just create a change request for an InfoSouce. Now we transport this change request from DEV system to TEST system. But when this change request was imported on TEST system, got the "Method Execution" red error which can be checked through STMS in log. The red error msg is "Source system A does not exist", where A is our R3 DEV server. Actually we need the source system B which is R3 TEST server in the InfoSouce transported into BW TEST system, but the problem is that the change request was created on BW DEV which uses A as Souce System in the InfoSouce, then how to make the InfoSouce has B on BW TEST after the transport?
Roberto gave an answer (see my another post: What should BASIS do for an InfoSource transport for Souce System change?) as below:
"you have to set the source system mapping in your target system in RSA1, Transport Connection -> F8 and then import your request again !"
But he said this setting would be done at the target or TEST system. I don't think it's right, this mapping setting should be done at the DEV system since our transports are created in DEV Transport Connection, am I right?
Please verify who is right?

hi Kevin,
let's refer to sap's doc
'bw and transport'
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3010ba90-0201-0010-2896-e58547c6757e
p. 33
'.. make sure to set the source system mapping configuration in each <u>target system</u> to convert the transfer rules ..'

InfoSource 8ODS_SLS is not defined in the source system

Hi Guys,
    When I tried to load data from ODS to Infocube, I am getting the following error.
InfoSource 8ODS_SLS is not defined in the source system
      Source System is not R/3. It is just a flat file and data was uploaded into ODS. When transferring the data from ODS to Infocube, I get this problem. And I have defined the update rules for infocube and also given the infosource name as ODS.
      But the data is not getting uploaded in the Infocube.

First replicate your BWSELF system.
Then, Run this program in SE38:
rs_transtru_activate_all
Enter the source system (your BW system)
Enter the datasource (8ODS_SLS).
If you get an error message immediately, the datasource doesn't exist. If it runs, check and make sure you get no error messages.
/smw

Identify the Source System in CRM BADI

Hi,
I need to write the code in ORDER_SAVE BADI in CRM based on the source system. For example, When i create the quotation in PCUI i need to validate few fields. Suppose i have created quotaton in R/3 and it gets transfer to CRM and i need validate few more fields.
How do i findout in BADI whether the source system is PCUI or R/3? I have checked the SYST table but no difference in both the case. Anyother way to findout this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Bala.c

Hello Bala,
In the ORDERADM_H structure of the CRM_ORDER_READ or in the CRMD_ORDERADM_H table you find a field called LOGICAL_SYSTEM. In that field the RFC destination of the source system (source system = where the order/transaction was created) will be stored.
For PCUI this field will have the RFC destination of the CRM server itself.
For R/3 it will have the RFC destination of the R/3 system.
Hope this helps,
Reward points if useful!
Regards,
Joost

Mapping of Quality System (Source System) after the Transport

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for