Mapping of SRM UOM with backend system UOM

Hi,
In the SRM system customization, where we can map the UOM's in the SRM system with the UOM's in the backend system?
Could you please explain navigation path in the SRM system?
Thanks & Regards
Ravi

Hi
You need to download the UOMS from Backend using CRM middleware.
DNL_CUST_BASIS3 is the object name.
Pls. check this blog for the procedure to download UOMs, Product categories and Products from backend.
/people/marcin.gajewski/blog/2007/02/05/how-to-replicate-material-master-from-r3-to-srm
Once downlaoded from backend, the UOMs are updated automatically.
Regards
Kedar

Similar Messages

Compliance Calibrator Issue with Backend system

Hi Experts,
We have situation where we are unable to run any risk analysis from CC to our backend system.
The error we are getting is " Can not execute BAPI USERLIST, Invalid value in OPTION field of value table for IN itab operator"
and the RFC ID in R/3 system is getting below dump
" The current ABAP/4 program attempted to execute an ABAP/4 Open SQL
statement in which the WHERE condition contains an IN itab operator.
The IN itab operator is used with internal tables which
have the following structure:
SIGN(1) OPTION(2) LOW LIKE db_field HIGH LIKE db_field
The OPTION column should contain only one of the following values:
"EQ LE GE CP BT NE LT GT NP NB"
The value "##" is not allowed here."
The functin module is /VIRSA/ZCC_GET_USER_LIST
Recently we have upgraded our R/3 system to ECC6.0, after upgrade we are geting this error.
Please help us.
Thank you.

"Recently we have upgraded our R/3 system to ECC6.0, after upgrade we are geting this error."
During upgrade, what method (process) you followed to upgrade VIRSANH ? What is version of VIRSANH , is it 5.3?
Earliar was it VIRSA or VIRSANH installed on your system?
Do you also have SAP_HR component?
regards,
Surpreet

MSS Component not connected with Backend system

Hello All,
In our NW Portal 7.01 system, we have got old Business package of MSS 60.1 & when we are trying to connect to our backend system R/3 4.7, we are able to connect it.
Now we have upgraded portal to EHP1 and then we are trying to do the same, then we are not able to connect to MSS business package, as we are getting TP Host missing error and connection not able to do with R/3 system
Has anyone come across such scenario? please update us asap.

Just 1 correction, we are able to work successfully with NW 7.0, but not after upgrade to EHP1.
So need to know, whether anyone is able to work with NW 7.01?

Reg_GRC 10.0 Integration with backend systems

Hi Everyone,
Could you please help me to find out which all of the below products can be integrated with GRC 10.0 Access control.
Click Schedule
PI System
BOBJ - CMS
BOBJ-DS-CMS
SAP Mobile Platform - Derby
Afaria
ADP
ARIS Cloud
SOLMON
Adobe Live Cycle
SAP Mobile Platform - Agentry
Click Plan
Click Roster
Success Factors - LMS
Success Factors - EC
Success Factors - Talent Management
Success Factors - Performance Management
Benefitfocus
BOOMI
KNOA
SAP Central Process Scheduling by Redwood
SAP Extended Diagnostics by CA Wily
SAP Quality Center by HP, enterprise edition, bundle
SAP Test Acceleration and Optimization
SAP NetWeaver Landscape Virtualization Mgmt enterprise
Thanks and Regards,
Naga.

Hi Hemant
SAP has made a lot of the transport functionality in GRC10. I find that they hereby created a huge expectation with the customer, that in fact is not true.
For instance Exclusion Objects and Mitigation Controls are NOT transported. What about Organizations? Critical Roles and Profiles are also not transportable.
As for the Connectors - system specific parameters are transported. Therefore you end up having to delete the DEV and QA connectors in the PRD GRC system.
On this question, has anyone used CLM yet? It seems that only Functions and Risks will be extracted to CLM and then deployed in the other system (DEV to QA for example). Does CLM even work?
SAP provide not guidance on all of these important issues. I agree that it is about time that SAP takes some leadership and produce a proper best practise guide for this software. By the way, an offical sizing document from SAP is still to be delivered.
Thanks
Will

Not able to do user Mapping with the backend System

Hello all,
I am trying to Map a user to a windows based KM System but getting an error like
"There is a configuration issue which leads to problems when accessing user mapping data for the selected backend system 'KM_Test_System'. Usually, the reason is user mapping being configured for strong encryption, but the necessary additional files being missing. Check the security log file for further information and hints on how to solve the problem."
Can somebody tell me what could be the possible reason for this and how to handle this. I dont have access to the Portal server right now , so not able to see the security log.
Thanks to all,
Regards,
Sarabjeet Singh.

Hi Sarbjeet,
I believe this links will help you understand and solve your problem:
user mapping is not saved
and
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/04/d246215f1d4f588d1d9c49391acb01/frameset.htm
Hope this helps,
Robert

Unable to distribute the MODEL to backend system in SRM 5.0

Hello Experts,
I have created distribution model " SRM_to_R3" in BD64, maintained message types BBPCO, BBPIV and MBGMCR
Every time I try to Distribute this MODEL to back end system I get the following error in IDES system
Target system T90CLNT090       Commnunication error occurred, error when opening an RFC connection
RFC connections are
T90CLNT090   - SRM to R3
SRM_00_800   - R3 to SRM
Systems got connected successfully and I can "Remote Logon" too......
My query is why am not able to send or distribute the MODEL from SRM to ECC backend system ?
How to get rid of the error and successfully distribute MODEL to backend system.........appreciate your help in this regard
Rgds !
SAP Novice

Hi Zuljana,
Kindly check if your partner profile is active. (Indicated by 'A')
Sometimes if your partner profile is not active, you wont be able to distribute your model. Check the 'A' indicator
Regards,
Nikhil
Edited by: Pbponikhil on Dec 21, 2010 4:11 PM

Incorrect distribution -Error while distributing GOA to R3 Backend system

Hi,
We have installed SRM server 5.5 and implementing contract Management
scenario with backend system R/3 4.6B.
In this scenario we are creating a Global Outline Agreement in SRM
system and distributing it to the back-end ERP system.
In SRM5.0 GOA (Trans.type GCTR) that are distributed at Header level
are failing to distribute to R/3 system v4.6b
We are getting this error message in SRM transaction SLG1: -
The error ocurred by processing event RELEASED_NEWLY with GUID
DCA7101B320134F1949F000347DE470F and object_id= 5600000054 " RECEPIENT
NOT FOUND"
The purchasing org , the plant has been mapped .Also vendor & material is maintained for the company & Plant .
The condition types are mapped in SRM
Pls suggest.
Regards,
Avinash

Hi Avinash,
In reference to your query about GOA, the distribution error might be beacause of the issues in BADI implementation.
By using the BADI you can define which document to be created in the backend.
BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE BADI can be used in SRM and BBP_CTR BADI can be used in back end R/3 for this purpose.
Check for the transaction types (GCTR) and the number ranges for the transaction types.
The GOA will either create a contract or a Scheduling agreement in R/3 back end after distribution.
Also refer the below SDN thread in this regard :
Re: Scheduling Agreement from GOA
Any further clarifications are welcome.
Award points for suitable answers.
Rgds,
Teja

UoM issue due to multiple backend systems

Hi All,
We have multiple backend systems hooked up with the SRM system. One issue that we have is that many of the UoMs are different in the backend systems. For example, for THOUSANDS, we have TH and THO in different systems. As part of optimization we intend to include only 1 entry per UoM in SRM box.
The problem is if we put TH as the unit, then if it is chosen by a user linked to the backend system that does not have this Commercial unit, then the Shopping Cart fails when trying to create a follow-on document.
Any advice how we can get this resolved will be greatly appreciated.
Best Regards
Gaurav

Hi Gaurav,
Common problem when using multiple back-ends, which can be resolved rather easily. The best way to solve this is by a business change. That isu2026. synchronize the use of the UoMu2019s throughout the organization. This would be the most elegant solution. All back-ends will then have the same valueu2019s in their respective CUNI tables.
Off course the feasibility of this will depend on your organizational structure and the hitting the u2018right stringsu2019 in order to get every one to understand the importance of this.
As a back-up an other solution would be to create a Z-table which will translate the UoM used in the SRM system to the corresponding UoM in the respective back-endsu2026.. The table will have three columns. u2018SRM UoMu2019 u2013 u2018Back-end Systemu2019 u2013 Back-end UoM. Depending on the implementation scenario U use, you can have the interface to the back-end carry out the translation. For this you can use the available Badiu2019s: BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW, BBP_CREATE_BE_RQ_NEW, BBP_CREATE_BE_RS_NEW
Downside of this solution will be the extra maintenance effort for the Z-table. Best choice in my perspective would be the business change.
Kind Regards,
Skander

User mapping certificate in UME (J2EE) with ABAP system as Backend (SNC)

I hope someone can help me with the user mapping concept (X.509 V3 certificates) for both "worlds" (ABAP and JAVA Stack).
I know how to install and configure certificate based (X.509) login to SAP ABAP and SAP JAVA (J2EE) Stack (--> enable encryption for communication and Single Sign On).
Situation:
We have a ready installed and configured X.509 certificate authentication environment for the ABAP world (between SAP GUI and SAP Server System)
and the user mapping was configured in the ABAP System (SU01). As the users are using certificates, the passwords are deactivated on the ABAP System.
Now if you want to integrate a JAVA (J2EE) Sytem and you want to configure the UME to the ABAP System (as Backend), you have an administrative effort problem with the user mapping (X.509) in the UME configuration.
1.) It is possible to assign manually the user public key to every user --> But to much effort
2.) As the user does not have a password (deactivated in the ABAP system), the way to combine the automatic mapping with a user login does not work.
3.) In the distinguished name of the user certificate there is no information about the SAP username itself
--> you are not able to use any information of the DN to bind a user in the Login Module configuration.
Now my question:
Is it possible to use the sncname information from the ABAP System (still configured and available) for the UME configuration?
As i know, it is possible to write an own Login Module. Does anybody has a customized Login module for this issue?
At the end the best solution would be to enable the same user mapping mechanism on the JAVA world as on the ABAP world. --> Mapping the Distinguished Name to the SAP User

We have developed a login module which is working with Kerberos auth, not x.509 auth, but still solves a very similar problem to the problem you are describing. As you know, when SNC is used to logon to ABAP stack, the SNC name of the user is mapped onto a SAP user via entries in the USRACL table. Our mapping login module takes the authenticated user principal name from the shared state and uses this to lookup the entry in USRACL table on ABAP stack, and from this it will know which SAP user to use, and can update shared state with this info so that CreateTicketLoginModule will created an SSO2 ticekt for the mapped SAP user id.
This means that mapping of users externally authetnicated identity onto SAP user/client can be managed in one place, e.g in ABAP stack using USRACL table entires and su01 t-code etc.
I know it is not exactly what you wanted, since you are looking to use x.509 certifiates instead of Kerberos authentication, but I thought it was worth sharing so that you know the concept has already been implemeneted many times. Many of our customers use this login module when they have our product, for the same reasons that you have stated.
Thanks,
Tim

"Backend systems with Release 701 are not supported " - ECC 6.0 to SRM 5.0

Hi ,
I have 2 doubts .
1. We are getting Error "Backend systems with Release 701 are not supported " while replicating vendors from ECC 6.0 backend system to SRM 5.0 system.
There are some notes on simillar topic but are not for SRM 5.0 ,suggested on SDN. an anyone please suggest what need to be done for the same.
2. Can we replicate Vendor Master Data with Contact Person from SRM to ECC system ? if yes, How ?
Regards
Narendra

answer 1:-
Note 1372175 - BBP_VENDOR_GET_DATA_JOB "Back-End Systems Not Supported"
On recent upgrade of the ECC back-end system to release '701' the program BBP_VENDOR_GET_DATA_JOB is getting errored out. If you are using SRM 5.0 , SRM_SERVER 550 with ECC backend Release 701 you encounter the above reported problem
Other terms
Vendor Replication Job, Release 701, Backend not supported, BBP_VENDOR_GET_DATA_JOB
Reason and Prerequisites
The program does not consider the release 701
remote_release EQ '700' OR remote_release EQ '701'.
OR
bbp_vendor_get_data - DEBUG what ois the remote_release 700 or 701?
Muhtu

Same business partner number for SRM and backend system

Hello all, I am working in SRM 7.0 in a classic scenario.
I am trying to replicate vendors from backend system to SRM, but I want that all vendors have same number in two systems, for example:
Vendor 1000 in backend shows as 1000 in SRM
How can I do it?
Thanks in advance
Rosa Rodríguez

Hello,
A. You need to customizing settings in SRM system
1. Define Number ranges as External (Same number ranges which are maintained in R3 backend sytem)
(Tcode:BUCF / Path: IMG --> Cross-Application Components --> SAP Business Partner > Basic Settings> Number Ranges and Groupings --> Define Number Ranges)
2. Define Groupings and Assign Number Ranges (Path: IMG --> Cross-Application Components --> SAP Business Partner > Basic Settings> Number Ranges and Groupings --> Define Groupings and Assign Number Ranges )
B. Before replication you need extract payment terms and UOM in SRM system & Create the Vendor root org structure (Tcode: PPOCV_BBP)
@Experts: Please add if i miss any thing apart from this.
Regards,
Suneel Kumar Singan

Automatic Replication of Vendors from SAP R/3 Backend System to SRM System

Hi All,
I am searching for any existing standard configuration in SRM V 4.0 System for replicating Vendors of selected Purchasing Organizations from SAP R/3 Backend System to SRM System.
I have checked in the SPRO settings of SRM System and found/could make out from the documentation avalable in help itself, that there is a standard configuration by which you can automatically replicate the Vendors created in SAP R/3 by activating the following in SPRO: By putting a tick mark against the Check Box existing against "Create New Vendors also" under Vendor Synchronization with Make Global Settings I hope.
If the above statement is correct, then I hope we have to schedule a job ,since the above configuration is based on a job based execution which should run at least once a day.
In that case,which would be the relevant job which has to be created WITH A VARIANT in order to filter the Purchasing Organizations desired for.
Please help me out since we have to implement this asap.And if the above solution is not at all feasible,then please do reply at the earliest.
Awaiting for your early reply .
Regards
Annette

Hi
Please try this ->
<b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/56/54f137a5e6740ae10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/bb/6c0e3b02616a42e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/62/fb7d3cb7f58910e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/5e/88ef3bc8821d0de10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
Regards
- Atul

Backend System with Release 701 are not supported

SRM 5.0
Extended Classic Scenario
CCM 2.0
When updating the vendors in SRM system using TC - BBPUPDVD getting the below error message :-
Backend System with Release 701 are not supported
Have checked in table - BBP_BACKEND_DEST, the backend entry is properly maintained.
Can any one advice.
Regards,
Jayoti
Edited by: SAP jayoti on Dec 7, 2010 1:11 PM

The problem is resolved for vendor relication after applying the below notes 1313972 and 1372175.
ECC sandbox seems to be in 701 release. When the backend system ECC is in release 701, vendor replication fails with the error message that 'Backend system release 701 not supported'. We need to apply notes 1313972 and 1372175 to fix this issue. I have applied them in Sandbox and the issue is resolved now.

SRM 7.01 Backend Contracts creation with XI/PI ESOA Service

Hello, we are implementing SRM 7.01 PPS with Extended Classic Scenario. We need to create contracts backend contracts ( ECC) from RFX RESPONSE at SRM. As we have ECC 6.0 EHP 5 we have to use Esoa services. The problem is that we have set up PI but no contract is created at ECC ( not even in SRM) when we pressed button " create contracts" from rfx response even thought the message at SRM is " contracts XXXXXX created" I think we are missing some customizing in ECC.
We have already implemented badi BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS
I read note 1268821 who explains that we have to activate business function LOG_MM_P2PSE_1 in ECC but I think this only apply for "CENTRAL CONTRACTS" and we dont want to use central contracts. We just want to creates contracts at ECC from rfx response in SRM. I couldn´t find any documentation about this, just for Central Contracts or backend contracts creation (through idocs) . Any idea?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Best Regards
Liam

The first interface that try to get out from SRM was " PurchasingContractERPRequest_Out_V1", thus based on this interface we made the configuration on PI. So, after pressing button " create contract" on srm if we execute tx SXI_MONITOR in SRM we found the interface " PurchasingContractERPRequest_Out_V1" and in the backend system ( ECC) at tv SXI_MONITOR we found interface PurchasingContractERPRequest_In_V1 for this contract with black and white flag ( processed successfully) but no contract created in ECC not even SRM.
Anyway we have checked that inbound proxy is executed but we dont see any contract created
Is this the right Interface? We are missing something?
Best regads and thanks again for your help!

Problem in SRM (with backend PO)

Hi,
I have a problem in creating a PO with backend product category in backend. The error message is some backend documents could not be determined.
But I could able to create a PR Reservation and Direct PO for the same Product Category. (in the backend and in SRM too).
Org Structure:
I have maintained the transaction type in attribute tab. (backend/EC).
I have maintained the Product Responsibilties and Org Responsibilities for the Respective Pgrp. (Product Cateogeries)
I also have maintained the Product Categories in Extended attributes.
In SRM I havent maintained the transaction type for the EC but I have maintained the follow on document number range. (shopping cart)
The Transaction Type is maintained in the backend and the number range as external.
I have also maintained the Product categories in Technical Basic settings and defined the backend system with respect Product categories in Cross application basic settings.
Please let me know if you need any more information...
Thanks
Jagan

Hi Jagan,
If your SC is considered as complete by SRM (but with a fixed vendor and not a preferred vendor) the system will check if it can create a PO in R/3.
For this, each item will request a META_INTERPRETE_DATA to R/3, asking if it can create a PO. If R/3 considers this data as incomplete, it will reply to create a PR.
Usual cases of R/3 PR creation instead of PO:
- prefered vendor in SRM (and not a fixed one)
- custom checks in user exits in R/3
- error messages in R/3 (ex: O6 334 In the case of a fixed vendor, please enter info record)
Kind regards,
Yann

Mapping of SRM UOM with backend system UOM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for