Maps behavior differs between devices

This morning I went to go pick up an iPhone 5, and I used the maligned Maps program on my old iPhone 4 to get to the store. It wasn't that bad -- but when I got the new phone, the maps program worked differently on the new phone?
Specifically, on the old phone, I was able to swipe side-to-side on the individual 'green-sign' directions, to step back and forth to see what the next turn would be.
On the new phone, I was stuck on the current step in the directions -- no swiping at all. All I could do was go back to an overview or a list of all the directions.
What's the deal? I should be able to swipe between the direction steps, shouldn't I? It certainly was a LOT easier to work with that way. Being stuck in close view on the current step is no good.
Has maps been updated? Maybe my old phone had a newer version than the new phone?
Thanks,
Bob

Any word on the status of this Bug Fix?
Why is the Swipe feature only available when not using your Current Location? I would really like the Swipe feature to be available regardless of the method of search (Current Location versis typed location).
It appears that cetain functionality is mutually exclusive.
If inputting two locations locations, Swipe feature available but not turn-by-turn voice navigation or ETA statistics.
If using Currentl Location, just the opposite features are available.
All these features should be available all the time. Seems like a great feature.
Next steps in Map view?

Similar Messages

Mapping Design - SOAP body content needs to be different between test and production

Hello,
We are integrating with a 3rd party SOAP receiver who uses the same web service URLS for test and production.
So to differentiate they exposed 2 web services which do the same thing but have different root and payload node names...along with account details.
For example, for production our SOAP XML must follow pattern like:
<Envelope>
<Body>
<appRequest>
<userID>produser</userID><password>prodpwd</password>
<appPayload>
<?xml>
blah blah this XML is the same between test and production
</xml>
</appPayload>
etc
But for their testing we must use:
<Envelope>
<Body>
<appRequestTest>
<userID>testuser</userID><password>testpwd</password>
<appPayloadTest>
<?xml>
blah blah this XML is the same between test and production
</xml>
</appPayload>
etc
So I'm trying to think of a good way to handle this difference in one set of mappings that we can use in our 3 PI platforms Dev / Test / Prod
Since these differences are in the SOAP Body does it need handled in mapping or is there a way to handle it in the Adapter Config which is naturally different between our environments (mapping we like to keep the same).
What is a smart way to handle this scenario?
Many thanks,
Aaron

I second Artem when he states that this is a bad design decission from the caller's side.
However this is not gonna help you in the current situation, right?
The problem you are facing is that by poor design the message does not have a root node which you may use to handle occurences. Let me explain further
You would be good if prod message looked like so
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soapenv:Header/>
<soapenv:Body>
<appData>
   <appRequest>
   </appRequest>
</appData>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
and test message looked like so
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soapenv:Header/>
<soapenv:Body>
<appData>
   <appRequestTest>
   </appRequestTest>
</appData>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
--> Then you would have been able to specify occurence of <appRequest> and <appRequestTest> as 0..1
So I think you have (besides what Artem already pointed out) 2 other options:
1. activate "do not use SOAP envelope" on sender SOAP channel and then designing the data types like above
2. Use HTTP instead of SOAP adapter and designing data types like above
Hope I didn't miss something crucial :-)
Cheers
Jens

Can i share live documents in pages between different apple devices with different owners

Can i share live documents in pages between different apple devices with different owners

iTunes: How to share music between different ... - Apple - Support

What different between Hong Kong, Chinese or American version devices?

Hi. What different between Hong Kong, Chinese or American version devices? Thank you.

Thanks to all. I want to buy a new iphone and in China the big difference in price. The seller says that HongKong version is better because is special better material, is it true?.And difference in price between CN ZP and American is nearly 200$. I want to know except the bands have any difference?

Will I be able to disable the automatic icloud sync between devices?

What I want to know from looking at the keynote speech it looks like if I buy a song on my phone or ipad it will also get downloaded to my son's iphone even though he may not want the sond and vice versa. I hope there will be a way to disable the automatic sync between devices because in theory it sounds good but when you have several ios devices in the family they usually don't want to have the same music that I listen too. I have a MBA, Iphon4, and Ipad and would not mind all of them syncing together but my son's iphon 3GS does not need to be synced with the other devices. I didn't hear anything about being able to disable it and if someone knows can they let the rest of us know. Thanks.

PopinFRESH wrote:
Yes you can disable it. Also since it's free for all of those services, and you want different content on your devices, you could just setup an Apple ID for your son so that their content will be synced among their devices and you can still benefit from all the iCloud goodness. The only downfall to this is that the content that you may want to share would have to be purchased twice. I'm hoping they add support for "Family Groups" for iCloud services so you can have a shared Apple ID for content on up to 10 devices while also giving the flexibility for having sub-ID's to differentiate who's devices are who's.
That is exactly what I am talking about. I know you can share your purchases through several devices and some of the app store stuff my son and I share with no problem. I just hope that sharing is ok. Also using picture flow could be bad too. What if I want to take a picture that I don't want on any other device. This is all good but sounds like they didn't think this through all the way before implementing it. I am a mobileme subscriber and have been for 2 years and I liked iDisk. There was nothing wrong with the way it worked as I could set up iDisk only on my devices and my son's would not be affected. Like I said good idea but for some of us we may not want stuff out on the cloud automatically.
Also I can see some folks up in arms about privacy issues just like they did with the tracking issue. I am thinking I will turn this service off on all my devices until I get more information about it after it is implemented.

Playlist order different between iPhone and iTunes

I updated to 3.1 and iTunes 9. In iTunes lets say i have 5 songs in a playlist. Lets say I Will Not Bow, Let The Beat Build, So Sharp, Good Time, and Fall. But on my iPhone in the same playlist they are ordered Let The Beat Build, Good Time, I Will Not Bow, So Sharp, then Fall. Why would they be ordered differently between the two? Anyone else having this problem?

There is a solution for this problem. Right click your smartlist; select edit smartlist; UNCHECK "live updating"; Then sync your files. This will adjust your device (iPod, iPhone) list to the way it is in your iTunes list.
It does mess up adding new songs to your smartlist if you use a specific method of list names which adds a song automatically. If this is the case, check "live updating" using the method above, add your song, then uncheck it again to keep the order as it is in iTunes.
Hope this helps. It works for me everytime a list messes up. I read about this fix somewhere in these forums, tried it and it works like a charm!!
ks

How the implementation differs between BW and BI , Is BI takes more time fo

Hi All,
I would like to know difference between implemenation and time lines for MM as mentioned below.
How the implementation differs between BW and BI , Is BI takes more time for implementing MM module than on BW?
Thanks in advanced. (Full points will be awarded)
With Regards,
PCR

Hi Timo,
Thanks for response!
But as i read from the following url: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15051_01/apirefs.1111/e10653/oracle/jbo/ViewObject.html, the setQueryTimeOut(int timeOutMills), the timeOut is mentioned in milliseconds. Please correct me if I am wrong.
and i have overriden the executeQuery() method in the View Object Impl class as shown below:
public void executeQuery() {
Map sessionScope = ADFContext.getCurrent().getSessionScope();
sessionScope.put("MyQuery", this);
try {
super.executeQuery();
} finally {
sessionScope.remove("MyQuery");
throw new JboException("Query Taking too long to respond");
and in the JAVA class i am calling the above method like this:
monitor.setQueryTimeOut(6);
monitor.executeQuery();
But the issue is:
1. The above exception message is getting carried forward to other pages as well. I mean somewhere in the session/ADFContext this message is being saved and error comes up/pops up when i click on other tabs of the page. How do i clear this?
2. The above exception message is coming for the first time but when i click the 'Submit' button second time, i am getting the results and also the message that 'Query is taking too long to respond'. This should not be the case, everytime it should show the same message as the timeout limit is less and the query should end without fetching the results.
Kindly let me know how to resolve the above issues, any pointers will be helpful.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: user9223904 on Nov 3, 2012 4:42 AM

Whats the different between regular strems and buffered streams?

Hum , Hey.
Whats the different between regular streams(un buffered) and buffered streams?
When should I use buffered streams and when should I use buffered streams?
Thanks in advance !

Gonen wrote:
CeciNEstPasUnProgrammeur wrote:
Heck, I often asked myself that, too. If only there were any documentation for those classes one could read...
The buffer allows the stream to read a whole chunk of data, even though your program requests it one byte at a time. Reading larger chunks from a file e.g. is much faster than trying to read single bytes. Especially considering that usually, a whole cluster is read and you'd discard all but one byte, and then repeat the same...so if the buffered is faster . why there is un buffered streams?Lots of reasons. Maybe you're sure you're going to send or receive all the data in one transaction, so you don't want to waste memory on another buffer. Maybe you're sending data to a device that requires real-time input, like a robotic arm.

Why parition table is different between S10 3/05 and S10 6/06?

I want to set up RAID 1 (mirroring) using the Solaris Volume Manager (SVM) on my Solaris 10 6/06 x86 machine. I have 2 identical Seagate 40GB HDD's (model ST340016A).
The partition table on the primary disk was already defined by Solaris 10 3/05 OS before I reinstalled the OS (Solaris 10 6/06). The partition table of the primary disk is as follows:
leopard $ prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c0d0s2
* /dev/rdsk/c0d0s2 partition map
* Dimensions:
* 512 bytes/sector
* 63 sectors/track
* 32 tracks/cylinder
* 2016 sectors/cylinder
* 38771 cylinders
* 38769 accessible cylinders
* Flags:
* 1: unmountable
* 10: read-only
* Unallocated space:
* First Sector Last
* Sector Count Sector
* 20984544 57173760 78158303
* First Sector Last
* Partition Tag Flags Sector Count Sector Mount Directory
0 2 00 6048 8390592 8396639 /
1 3 01 8396640 2098656 10495295
2 5 00 0 78158304 78158303
3 7 00 10495296 2098656 12593951 /var
4 0 00 12593952 4195296 16789247 /opt
5 8 00 16789248 4195296 20984543 /home
8 1 01 0 2016 2015
9 9 01 2016 4032 6047
It has 38771 cyclinders.
Now I want to create exactly the same partition table on the secondary disk, but it refuses to match the same partition table to the primary disk. It stills gives 40GB, but the number of cycliners is not the same. Below is the partition table of the secondary disk.
leopard $ prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c0d1s2
* /dev/rdsk/c0d1s2 partition map
* Dimensions:
* 512 bytes/sector
* 63 sectors/track
* 255 tracks/cylinder
* 16065 sectors/cylinder
* 4864 cylinders
* 4862 accessible cylinders
* Flags:
* 1: unmountable
* 10: read-only
* Unallocated space:
* First Sector Last
* Sector Count Sector
* 48195 78059835 78108029
* First Sector Last
* Partition Tag Flags Sector Count Sector Mount Directory
2 5 01 0 78108030 78108029
8 1 01 0 16065 16064
9 9 00 16065 32130 48194
leopard $
It has 4864 cyclinders not 38771. Why?
You can see the disk dimension is different between these 2 disks. I tried to redefine it to match the primary disk, but it keeps coming back to the different table.
Do you know why the partition table defined by Solaris 10 6/06 differs to what Solaris 10 3/05 had defined? How do I force the parition table to match with the primary disk? Both disks must match so that SVM would work.
Can anyone shed any light as to why it happens? Thank you for your help.
Trevor

I want to set up RAID 1 (mirroring) using the Solaris Volume Manager (SVM) on my Solaris 10 6/06 x86 machine. I have 2 identical Seagate 40GB HDD's (model ST340016A).
The partition table on the primary disk was already defined by Solaris 10 3/05 OS before I reinstalled the OS (Solaris 10 6/06). The partition table of the primary disk is as follows:
leopard $ prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c0d0s2
* /dev/rdsk/c0d0s2 partition map
* Dimensions:
* 512 bytes/sector
* 63 sectors/track
* 32 tracks/cylinder
* 2016 sectors/cylinder
* 38771 cylinders
* 38769 accessible cylinders
* Flags:
* 1: unmountable
* 10: read-only
* Unallocated space:
* First Sector Last
* Sector Count Sector
* 20984544 57173760 78158303
* First Sector Last
* Partition Tag Flags Sector Count Sector Mount Directory
0 2 00 6048 8390592 8396639 /
1 3 01 8396640 2098656 10495295
2 5 00 0 78158304 78158303
3 7 00 10495296 2098656 12593951 /var
4 0 00 12593952 4195296 16789247 /opt
5 8 00 16789248 4195296 20984543 /home
8 1 01 0 2016 2015
9 9 01 2016 4032 6047
It has 38771 cyclinders.
Now I want to create exactly the same partition table on the secondary disk, but it refuses to match the same partition table to the primary disk. It stills gives 40GB, but the number of cycliners is not the same. Below is the partition table of the secondary disk.
leopard $ prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c0d1s2
* /dev/rdsk/c0d1s2 partition map
* Dimensions:
* 512 bytes/sector
* 63 sectors/track
* 255 tracks/cylinder
* 16065 sectors/cylinder
* 4864 cylinders
* 4862 accessible cylinders
* Flags:
* 1: unmountable
* 10: read-only
* Unallocated space:
* First Sector Last
* Sector Count Sector
* 48195 78059835 78108029
* First Sector Last
* Partition Tag Flags Sector Count Sector Mount Directory
2 5 01 0 78108030 78108029
8 1 01 0 16065 16064
9 9 00 16065 32130 48194
leopard $
It has 4864 cyclinders not 38771. Why?
You can see the disk dimension is different between these 2 disks. I tried to redefine it to match the primary disk, but it keeps coming back to the different table.
Do you know why the partition table defined by Solaris 10 6/06 differs to what Solaris 10 3/05 had defined? How do I force the parition table to match with the primary disk? Both disks must match so that SVM would work.
Can anyone shed any light as to why it happens? Thank you for your help.
Trevor

IBooks bookmarks syncing incorrectly between devices

I have a book I am reading on iBooks on my MacBook Pro with Mavericks, my iPhone 5s with iOS 7, and my iPod touch 4g, which has iOS 6. I have each device set up to sync bookmarks and collections between devices, but the bookmarks keep syncing incorrectly. For example: I am reading on my iPhone, and I drop a bookmark 2 pages away from the end of chapter 40. If I open the book on my iPod touch it does not show the current bookmark, but an old one from earlier in the chapter. Another example: I am reading on my iPod touch, and I drop a bookmark two pages away from the end of chapter 40. This time, I open the book on my iPhone, and it has placed a new bookmark at chapter 39! I open the book on my MacBook Pro after that, and a bookmark has been placed at the beginning go chapter 40!
So, there you have it. I place a bookmark on one device, and the other two devices place bookmarks in completely different places on the book.
All of my devices have the same Apple ID, and both of the mobile devices are synced with iTunes.
Has anyone else experienced this?
Thanks.

The only info that syncs via iCloud for iBooks is collection lists (not the books themselves), Bookmarks, and Notes.
The Books themselves can be automatically downloaded if they are coming from the store. On the iPhone, go to Settings > iTunes & App Stores > Turn on Automatic Downloads for Books. Same thing can be done on the Mac in preferences.
Since your Books are not from the store, the only way to get them on both devices is to download them to both devices. This will never occur automatically. This also goes for PDFs you add to your iBooks
Hope that helps solve the mystery.
iBooks: How to sync iBooks between devices
If you buy a book on your Mac, it’s automatically available on all of your iOS devices with iOS 6 or later.
You can even synchronize your bookmarks, notes, and collections across your devices.

What's Different Between ODI and FDQM ?

I need to know What's Different Between ODI and FDQM ?

At is simplest ODI is an enterprise scale ELT tool that can cope with moving very large amounts of data bwteen heteregeneous systems. It requires a fair degree of technical knowledge to use well and that the user is pretty competent with SQL. It is not really an end user tool and the jobs tend to be lights out scheduled processes with a limited user interface for executing these jobs. FDQM is more of a data quaility tool which gives the average end user the out of the box functionality to be able to transform and load data into various target systems. It is not designed to move very large amounts of data efficiently i.e. multi millions of lines of data like ODI. However it does have a rich user interface that provides an easy to use mapping engine, a repeatbale controlled data load process and has a host of in built reporting and audit features which would have to be built from scratch in a tool like ODI

Different between "iostat 5" and "zpool iostat 5"

Hi,
if using ZFS, is it recommended to use zpool iostat over the normal iostat?
Basically what is the different between both?
In normal iostat, what is the most valuable info we need to look into to measure the performance? a_svc, b%, w%?
where in zpool iostat, what is the most valuable info we need to look into to measure the performance? and how to determine it is slow or fast? since, there are no a_svc, b%, w%??
in the following info in http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/819-5461/gammt/index.html?
# zpool iostat
capacity operations bandwidth
pool alloc free read write read write
rpool 6.05G 61.9G 0 0 786 107
tank 31.3G 36.7G 4 1 296K 86.1K
what does 786 and 107 for rpool refer to? kilobyte?bytes? bit?
Thanks

if using ZFS, is it recommended to use zpool iostat over the normal iostat?I like both of them, but I'd recommend 'zpool iostat -v' because it will also give you per-device statistics through zpool.
Basically what is the different between both?iostat displays statistics for all devices, zpool iostat will only give statistics for devices in a zpool. When you have cache and log devices and mirrors and stuff configured, iostat may not be very easy to read. But iostat has information on service time that zpool iostat does not have
In normal iostat, what is the most valuable info we need to look into to measure the performance? a_svc, b%, w%?I usually look at number of operations (read and write), service time (svc_t) and sometimes the throughbut (kread, kwrite). I don't trust %b or %w because I nerver really understood how they are calculated, I also suspect they may be calculated differently on different platforms (linux and solaris) and I have seen cases where they have just been wrong. So I go by rules of thumb for operations and service times:
A single disk should be able to provide ~100 random read operations per second. Maybe 150, maybe 75 but definitely somewhere in that region. If the reported number gets close to that (or bigger), I start to get worried.
The service time of a random read request should be about 4-6ms. Maybe 7 or 8. But if the service time is reported in double-digits, I start to get worried.
Everything else will depend on your application and your threshold for nervousness. Some of my customers feel ok until %b reaches 80%, some may think that service times of 12ms are ok. The best way is to compare these numbers to baselines from when the system is performing OK.
where in zpool iostat, what is the most valuable info we need to look into to measure the performance? and how to determine it is slow or fast? since, there are no a_svc, b%, w%??again, reads and writes is usually what I look for.
in the following info in http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/819-5461/gammt/index.html?
# zpool iostat
capacity operations bandwidth
pool alloc free read write read write
rpool 6.05G 61.9G 0 0 786 107
tank 31.3G 36.7G 4 1 296K 86.1K
what does 786 and 107 for rpool refer to? kilobyte?bytes? bit?bandwidth is reported in bytes. In this case, zpool iostat was called without a repeat-interval so only the average since system boot is reported. So in this case 786 bytes have been read per second on average since system start. Quite a useless number.
Bjoern

Wat is the different between AP set and ORI set?

i fedup about wan buy AP set or ori set... because AP set is cheaper but i scared AP set spoil more easily, i also heard people say AP set camera and sound system is different with ori set.... guys kindly please tell me wat is the different between AP set and ori set and izit same to buy AP set and ori set?THX YA ^-^....
Message Edited by geronimo on 24-Mar-2008 06:29 AM

Thanks YuliaKlimov, I can reproduce this issue, but I cannot explain the different behaviors between SSAS 2008 and 2008R2. As a workaround,
could you try to use dynamic set or create statics set but with fixed member for example:
CREATE
SET CURRENTCUBE.[Prior Month] AS
[Date].[Date Key].&[20050723].PrevMember
, DISPLAY_FOLDER = 'Relative Period Sets';
Personally, I think your set is dynamic set, because the currentmember is changed base on current selection. You can also submit this issue
on below official link to get confirmation from Product Group:
https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/
Thanks,
Raymond
Raymond Li - MSFT

Scrolling direction is different between iPhone and Trackpad.

Can i change the scrolling direction on the TrackPad? It is different between mobile device like iPhone and Trackpad.
TrackPad:
To scroll down i have to move my fingers from top to bottom.
on iPhone or iPad:
To scroll down i have to move my finger from bottom to top.
I want to use it in the same way, because it is confusing.
Greeting Koe

You will be able to when you upgrade to Lion. The gestures are as you describe.
Regards,
Captfred
http://www.apple.com/macosx/whats-new/gestures.html

How do you get your old scores on your games when you transfer the games between devices ive signed into game center and my scores are there but when I open the games Im at 0 again

how do you get your old scores on your games when you transfer the games between devices ive signed into game center and my scores are there but when I open the games Im at 0 again

Did you do this?
iOS: Transferring information from your current iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch to a new device

Maps behavior differs between devices

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for