MARS slow performance after latest patch?

I just moved our small MARS 50 to 4.3.2 and we're still crawling. The GUI is ungodly slow, is anyone else still having this issue? I saw a lot of complaints of MARS in regards to the 4.3.1 code, I'm not seeing much an improvement to 4.3.2.
Anyone else relate or have advice for me other than frequest reboots?

In our case, it was some bug with NAT sessionization. We have Checkpoint devices, but I'm not sure if it's limited to CP or any NAT device. Turning NAT sessionization off really boosted performance. Our pnparser CPU utilization went from >70% to <30%. It's a per device DB setting, so Cisco has to do it.

Similar Messages

Slow performance after iOS 7.1 upgrade, please help.

My kids have iPad Airs. One of them has a serious slow down in performance after upgrading to iOS 7.1. The others work fine. It is so slow that it is unusable. When you type a single character, it takes several seconds to show up on the screen. I'm rebooted and did a reset in Settings. Any other ideas? Please help.

I called Apple Support (800-275-2273) and they also recommended a reset: "Press the Home and On/Off buttons at the same time and hold them until the Apple logo appears".
It came to a screen with a USB cable and arrow to iTunes logo. I had to connect to my PC and lanuch iTunes. iTunes recognized the iPad in restore mode. My only option per Apple Support was to restore to factory defaults. It appears all data is lost.
The Apple Support person would not admit that this is a known issue with iOS 7.1 even though you can go online and see that may people have slow performance after upgrading to iOS 7.1.

Slow performance after installation of new OS-X

I don't know if anyone else has been experiencing the same problem as me, but it seemed to occur after I installed the new OS-X.
My MacBook Pro has gone stremely slow and it seems to be related to MAIL. I thought that the standard MAIL program that comes with MAC was the problem, so I installed Postbox and that seemed to work for a while (1 day or 2) and then it was the same. It's not just email programs that are slow, but all programs.
Click and wait seconds (10, 20, 30 sec) just for a program to open. Moving between files is so slow. I feel like I'm using Windows again.
I'm no expert, but when I look at MEMORY usage, out of 4GB I'm using 3.8GB. My Virtual Memory is 4.76GB. See screen shot below.
I would apprecaite if anyone can help me resolve what the problem is.
Thanks
Richard Giuliano

First, back up all data immediately unless you already have a current backup. If you can't back up, stop here. Do not take any of the steps below.
Step 1
This diagnostic procedure will query the log for messages that may indicate a system issue. It changes nothing, and therefore will not, in itself, solve your problem.
If you have more than one user account, these instructions must be carried out as an administrator.
Triple-click anywhere in the line below on this page to select it:
syslog -k Sender kernel -k Message CReq 'GPU |hfs: Ru|I/O e|find tok|n Cause: -|NVDA\(|pagin|timed? ?o' | tail | awk '/:/{$4=""; print}' | open -ef
Copy the selected text to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C.
Launch the Terminal application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Terminal in the icon grid.
Paste into the Terminal window (command-V). I've tested these instructions only with the Safari web browser. If you use another browser, you may have to press the return key.
The command may take a noticeable amount of time to run. Wait for a new line ending in a dollar sign (“$”) to appear.
A TextEdit window will open with the output of the command. Normally the command will produce no output, and the window will be empty. If the TextEdit window (not the Terminal window) has anything in it, stop here and post it — the text, please, not a screenshot. The title of the TextEdit window doesn't matter, and you don't need to post that.
Step 2
There are a few other possible causes of generalized slow performance that you can rule out easily.
Disconnect all non-essential wired peripherals and remove aftermarket expansion cards, if any.
Reset the System Management Controller.
Run Software Update. If there's a firmware update, install it.
If you're booting from an aftermarket SSD, see whether there's a firmware update for it.
If you have a portable computer, check the cycle count of the battery. It may be due for replacement.
If you have many image or video files on the Desktop with preview icons, move them to another folder.
If applicable, uncheck all boxes in the iCloud preference pane. See whether there's any change.
Check your keychains in Keychain Access for excessively duplicated items.
Boot into Recovery mode, launch Disk Utility, and run Repair Disk.
If you have a MacBook Pro with dual graphics, disable automatic graphics switching in the Energy Saverpreference pane for better performance at the cost of shorter battery life.
Step 3
When you notice the problem, launch the Activity Monitor application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Activity Monitor in the icon grid.
Select the CPU tab of the Activity Monitor window.
Select All Processes from the View menu or the menu in the toolbar, if not already selected.
Click the heading of the % CPU column in the process table to sort the entries by CPU usage. You may have to click it twice to get the highest value at the top. What is it, and what is the process? Also post the values for User, System, and Idle at the bottom of the window.
Select the Memory tab. What value is shown in the bottom part of the window for Swap used?
Next, select the Disk tab. Post the approximate values shown for Reads in/sec and Writes out/sec (not Reads in andWrites out.)
Step 4
If you have more than one user account, you must be logged in as an administrator to carry out this step.
Launch the Console application in the same way you launched Activity Monitor. Make sure the title of the Console window is All Messages. If it isn't, select All Messages from the SYSTEM LOG QUERIES menu on the left. If you don't see that menu, select
View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar.
Select the 50 or so most recent entries in the log. Copy them to the Clipboard by pressing the key combinationcommand-C. Paste into a reply to this message (command-V). You're looking for entries at the end of the log, not at the beginning.
When posting a log extract, be selective. Don't post more than is requested.
Please do not indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Important: Some personal information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting. That should be easy to do if your extract is not too long.

Clicking noise to the right of mouse pad, and very slow performance after updating software to Yosemite. Does anyone know what the issue might be?

So I recently updated to the latest Yosemite software (last night to be exact), and this morning i started to get a weird clicking and sort of grinding noise to the right of the mouse pad and extremely slow performance. I have no idea what is going on. If anyone has any ideas or suggestions please let me know.
Thank you

So I recently updated to the latest Yosemite software (last night to be exact), and this morning i started to get a weird clicking and sort of grinding noise to the right of the mouse pad and extremely slow performance. I have no idea what is going on. If anyone has any ideas or suggestions please let me know.
Thank you

Yoga Tab 2 8 inch slow performance after update

Hello everyone!
I recently bought a Yoga tablet 2 8 inch (Wifi only). By default, it was running smoothly, and the performance was overall solid, both on the launcher (Lenovo's and Google Now Launcher) and in apps.
However, after two updates (The first one was around 350MB and the second one 79MB), some aspects of the software got much slower.
For instance, when running on the stock Lenovo launcher, the transitions between the pages of apps are much slower. Even weirder, they are slower in landscape mode than in portrait mode! When running in portrait mode, the stock launcher is about as fast as it was before the updates.
The Google Now launcher, which was running fine before, is now running really slow both in portrait and landscape modes.
When it comes to apps, Gmail runs pretty smoothly while Chrome also seems to be capped at 30 fps. Opera, which I downloaded from the Play Store, seems smooth enough. YouTube is smooth when playing a video but choppy when navigating.
The settings of the tablet (display, networks...) is silky smooth as it should, while Kingston Office (provided by Lenovo) is struggling and laggy.
To sum up, some of the on board apps and the launchers seem to have taken a massive performance hit (while oddly enough some aspects of the software are smooth, like the settings), while third party apps downloaded from the store are, for the most part, unaffected, except for launchers (Granny Smith runs at 60 fps) (The performance on Nova Launcher is as poor as on Google Now Launcher)
I don't see any app running in the background (I even disabled some of them, like Security HD), and Power mangement tools are off.
The version of Android I am running on is 4.4.2, build : YOGA Tablet2-830F_S000195_150422. I also did a software reset through the settings, but the performance issue remains.
Sorry about this long description, but it looks like a software issue and any help is welcome, because other than that I really like this tablet. If you need more information, do not hesitate to ask.
Thank you!
Vincent

Hello Ronnie_S!
Yes I am running on the update that was released yesterday, however I noticed a performance drop on the first update I got (the 350MB one), so my performances were already hit before that latest update. So I can't tell you what effect the update released yesterday could have on your specific device.

Slow performance after app start up on AIR 2.6 on Android

I'm developing an application built using AS 3.0 compiled with the latest Flex 4.5 SDK. We have a CS5 fla expored as a SWC which is then imported by an AIR project.
We use a mx:Application mxml as the entry point to the application and immediately show a "Loading message" as the application finishes loading. How it's designed is it builds all the UI elements that are needed by the entire application, instantiates them, and then makes most invisible (or on lower layers in the viewstack). We realized we needed to call .stop() after we set the visible property as false. However the number of actual clips in the entire application is less than 300 instances in totality.
When we run the application on a desktop either as AIR or a flash swf on a webpage, the performance is fantastic. Every button reacts correctly, all the drop shadows appear perfect, and it functions with no issues. When I profile the application the memory footprint isn't that huge (~14mb) and it drops and climbs by a few mb, but never grows very large and always settles back down again.
Unfortunately when we deploy it to an HTC EVO, the exact same application starts to load and usually finishes quickly, but soon after it gets amazingly sluggish to touch response. Sometimes taking more than 15 seconds to register a button click event. After a minute or so, it suddenly goes back to normal and then functions perfectly well for the rest of the time it's running.
We've tried checking for any memory leaks or objects that don't get garbage collected, but there isn't really any culprit. We only use about 4 timers in the application and then they only run once every 5 to 10 seconds anyway. We've switched many of the filters and vector graphics to PNGs and turned it into gpu renderMode, however the application still functions the same. We've changed sprites that we don't change their rotation, color or alpha to cacheAsBitmap and cacheAsBitMapMatrix. Still no change.
Does anyone have any suggestions of where else to go next? We unfortunately can't release the source code of our application but may be able to provide compiled versions if anyone needs it.
-Matt Morrissette

So after a lot of additional investigation the only thing we can figure out that helps is frame rates.
According to:
http://www.unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos/2010/09/08/optimization-techniques-for-air-for-and roid-apps/
Setting the frame rate on the stage to something like "4" should improve your application's performance if you're not using any animations that you really want to be smooth.
Unfortunately we found with a frame rate of 4, the application has serious performance issues after it starts up (usually within 30 seconds). We are not using any components other than a few standard flex and flash components (imported from a swc) and no long movie clips or motion animation of any kind.
When we raise the frame rate to 8 suddenly the entire applications becomes much more responsive and the entire slow down issue disappears.
Thought I'd at least tell someone.
-Matt

Slow Performance after Leopard 10.5.2. Update

After updating to Mac OS X Leopard 10.5.2, I have encountered performance issues that I suspect are related to my Creative Suite applications.
I find that after a reboot, my system performs pretty well, but over time (a day or two) it starts to slow down dramatically. Using Activity Monitor to look for clues, I noticed what seems an inordinate number of "MSGS SENT" by several applications, e.g.:
Photoshop CS3 is running in the background with a document open, and it's sending about 100 Msgs per second.
Illustrator CS3 is running in te background with no document open, and it's sending about 500 Msgs per second
Unfortunately, I did not observe these numbers prior to updating to 10.5.2. But I have observed, that quitting these applications seems to restore system performance to an acceptable level.

I think it may have something to do with Photoshop's event
handling. That is, it is polling for input even though you
have no file open. I'll maybe take a look at this later if
I have time.

Very Slow Performance After Removing Windows Partition

Hello,
Recently I went through a failed attempt at installing Windows 7 onto my Macbook Pro using boot camp. After this failure I decided to try again another day and used the boot camp assistant to remove the Windows partition.
Ever since doing this, my computer has been running extremely slowly and beach balls on the simplest of tasks. I have tried resetting the SMC and my PRAM all to no avail. I have also used Disk Utility to verify my disk and it says that my disk looks OK.
Has anyone else experienced this/know of any possible fixes?
Thank you for your help!

Hi,
This may happen sometimes due to anti-virus or firewalls also.Disable them and check if it works better...Or, otherwise try these:
- First uninstall the latest Windows Updates.
Click on the Start Button> Type Windows Updates in the Start Search box > Click View Installed Updates at appears at the top > In the Installed Updates screen Sort the updates as per installed date by clicking on the Down arrow next to installed and choose a date or last week...
Uninstall the updates that were installed recently one by one. Do not restart.Click cancel on restart window.
Then perform a clean boot as shown in the link and follow these steps:
Perform a clean boot >
In the start search box type msconfig > Click Startup tab > Click disable all at the bottom > Then Click services > check the box next to Hide all microsoft services at the bottom > Then select disable all > Click Apply > Ok and restart.
Once it restarts then go to windows updates and complete all the updates > Restart and check. If it works better then Go bak to msconfig and enable only the startup programs and services that are required. Enable few and check again..
Let me know if problem continues..
Note:
If you have HP Support Assistant installed on the computer(The Blue Question Mark) then open it ==> Complete all pending Updates & Tuneups==> Restart and Check. It may solve your problem
Although I am an HP employee, I am speaking for myself and not for HP.
**Click on “Kudos” Star if you think this reply helped** Or Mark it as "Solved" if issue got fixed.

Mac OS slow performance after bootcamp installation

So, I've been searching around here and on other forums, but I haven't found a solution yet to this problem and wanted to see if others knew of it. The problem is that the performance on Mac OS seems to have degraded when I have bootcamp (with WIndows 7, 64bit) installed. I've gone through uninstalling and reinstalling bootcamp a couple of times now and the result always seems to be the same, Mac OS is much slower... although I should note that the Windows side of things seem unaffected, and I'd say that (gasp) WIndows is running more smoothly that the Mac OS on m machine. Pretty **** annoying.
Some symptoms:
- Slow boot time AFTER I log in. The loading of the desktop and apps seems to take forever, when prior to bootcamp they'd all pop-up in maybe 10 seconds max. Note: this is not the general boot-time from OFF to the login screen... that's fine.
- Loading applications (safari, terminal, etc) all seem to take forever to load. For instance, safari may take 30-60 seconds to load and show my home page. Before bootcamp, this would take a few seconds.
- Once in Safari, the load time from page to page seems slow and jerky. Say I load engadget.com, or something equally image/content heavy, it seems like the whole page has to load before I can even start to scroll. Even then, scroll seems 'jerky' and not so smooth. Again, before bootcamp, this wasn't a problem.
I've gone through a bunch of stuff to try and fix this, but nothing so far has helped. Here's what I've done so far:
- repaired permissions
- used disk utility to verify/repair any problems (it didn't find any problems, btw)
- reset PRAM
- rebuilt spotlight index
- disabled spotlight indexing of the BOOTCAMP by placing a file called '.metadataneverindex' in the root directory on that partition. This interestingly helped speed up the the post-login boot-time, but application loading and browser performance is still pretty bad.
Anyone else have these issues and figured out what's going on? An IT guy at my job told me to stay away from bootcamp 'because 'it'll slow down your machine', so I don't think this is an isolated occurrence.
From what I've read all over the place, I shouldn't be taking a performance hit on the Mac OS side of things for installing bootcamp. Any thoughts tips you could provide would be helpful.
*I might use Parallels or some other VM down the line, but I don't want to run Windows 7 solely in a VM. Yes, I HAVE tried installing Parallels with Windows 7 and it didn't slow anything down, but due to the nature of my work, I want to be able to boot to Windows directly without having any overhead. (this is small percentage of what I'd be doing with the Mac, but enough that I wanna get this bootcamp install working)

Sorry, Macbook Pro 13" 2.4 Ghz... pretty much a stock 13" new MBP. I'm running bootcamp 3.0.2.
I should also note that I was having this issue last week and decided to reinstall everything and start from scratch just to see if that helped. It's a new-ish Mac, so clearing everything out wasn't that big of a deal... other than taking the time to do it. I didn't use a time machine backup as I wanted to reset everything.
So, I think I've figured this out after fiddling with the user accounts per your suggestion. I had set up my Mac so that my general-use account was 'standard' with a separate admin account for installing stuff.(more secure) This was different from what I had setup last week where I had one account that was setup as the admin. (less secure)
I added a new user, 'test' as a standard account. I restarted into 'test' and still had an issue. I quick-switched over to my admin account for something and immediately noticed that everything speed up. Hmmm...
I changed my regular account back to admin and that restored the performance on my mac to its pre-bootcamp state. (happy!) I'll need to play around with this more, but it seems that the two things I did to fix this were:
1) Add the file to the bootcamp partition to exclude it from spotlight
2) Login as an admin account
I haven't had a chance to see if setting my account back to a standard account will in fact cause the performance to drop. I also then need to test with removing that file from BOOTCAMP to exclude it from spotlight. Right now, I think I have more correlation than causation, but at least it IS working well again.
I'll update later today. Hopefully I'm not going to have to leave my main account as the admin.
*ALSO, I tested out configuring Mac OSX to immediately unmount the bootcamp partition at login, and that did help with performance, but kind of made using Parallels a PITA as I had to then go and manually mount that partition when I wanted to get into Windows through parallels. It worked, but it was a janky work-around. I have since dropped that configuration and now just let BOOTCAMP mount.

Does any one experience having slow performance after upgrading to lion? (I'm using an iMac early 2008 with 4gb memory)

I'm having a problem on my iMac early 2008 (2.4GHz Core 2 Duo 4gb SDRAM) after upgrading to Mac OS X Lion.
The animation such as mission control and full screen and especially, launch pad performs really slow.
Sometimes, mission control doesn't even show the animation.
This is terrible and I want Apple to fix these problems or otherwise this is just making my mac useless.
Does anyone experience having similar problem?

thanks for the reply!
I've checked the activity monitor but nothing was taking up the space expect for Flash Player (Safari Internet plug-in, which takes up 29% of CPU)
here's my screenshot. can you see any problems?
and here's another

Slow performance after 10g upgrade

After upgrade from 9.2.0.3.0 to 10.2.0.1.0, the following query runs extremely slow, any suggestion how to adjust the DB settings without re-writing this query
SELECT SUM (ABS (ship_net_clc_amt))
FROM ship_dtl
WHERE order_section_number = '940007320686'
AND SUBSTR (misc_charge_code, 1, 2) IN ('72', '77', 'A9')
AND ics_status_flag2 IN ('W', 'S')
AND dsr_trans_date >= to_date('1/1/2008', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
AND dsr_trans_date < to_date('1/31/2008', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
AND product_base_number NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT sku
FROM ap_smb_sku_based
WHERE fiscal_period = '200801'
AND country = 'TAIWAN')
AND quota_product_line_code IN (SELECT pl
FROM ap_pl_bu
WHERE bu = '3C')
The exec plan for 10g (optimizer mode = ALL ROWS) is
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop ||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 49 | 7 (15)| 00:00:01 | | ||
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 49 | | | | ||
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | | | ||
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| SHIP_DTL | 1 | 42 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 39 | 39 ||
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 49 | 5 (20)| 00:00:01 | | ||
| 5 | SORT UNIQUE | | 1 | 7 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | ||
|* 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AP_PL_BU | 1 | 7 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | ||
| 7 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 3 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | 39 | 39 ||
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IX_SHIP_DTL_ORD_SEC_NM | 3 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | 39 | 39 ||
| 9 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 1 | 39 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 25 | 25 ||
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AP_SMB_SKU_BASED | 1 | 39 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 25 | 25 ||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The exec plan for 9i (optimizer mode=choose) for
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost | Pstart| Pstop ||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 47 | 10 | | ||
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 47 | | | ||
| 2 | FILTER | | | | | | ||
| 3 | HASH JOIN SEMI | | 1 | 47 | 8 | | ||
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| SHIP_DTL | 1 | 36 | 5 | 13 | 13 ||
| 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IX_SHIP_DTL_ORD_SEC_NR | 9 | | 3 | 13 | 13 ||
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AP_PL_BU | 2 | 22 | 2 | | ||
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AP_SMB_SKU_BASED | 1 | 21 | 2 | 13 | 13 ||
Thanks.
Liz

ship_dtl has 94690531 records
ap_smb_sku_based has 19 records
ap_plbu has 19 records
The query returns a single row, because it calculates the sum. The query could be better written to get rid of IN or NOT IN which are costly. But I just wonder why the plans/performance are so different?
I used analyze to analyze other tables and it is still working fine in 10g. Now based on the plans, do you think anything wrong ?
10g -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Id | Operation                                   | Name                   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |    TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib ||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                            |                        |     1 |    50 |    10 (-550| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            ||
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE                             |                        |     1 |    50 |            |          |       |       |        |      |            ||
|* 2 |   FILTER                                    |                        |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            ||
|* 3 |    PX COORDINATOR                           |                        |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            ||
|   4 |     PX SEND QC (RANDOM)                     | :TQ10002               |     1 |    50 |    66   (5)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,02 | P->S | QC (RAND) ||
|* 5 |      FILTER                                 |                        |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWC |            ||
|   6 |       MERGE JOIN                            |                        |     1 |    50 |    66   (5)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWP |            ||
|   7 |        SORT JOIN                            |                        |     2 |    14 |     4 (50)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWP |            ||
|   8 |         BUFFER SORT                         |                        |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWC |            ||
|   9 |          PX RECEIVE                         |                        |     4 |    28 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWP |            ||
| 10 |           PX SEND HASH                      | :TQ10000               |     4 |    28 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       ||
| 11 |            SORT UNIQUE                      |                        |     4 |    28 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            ||
|* 12 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL               | AP_PL_BU               |     4 |    28 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            ||
|* 13 |        SORT JOIN                            |                        |     1 |    43 |    62   (2)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWP |            ||
| 14 |         PX RECEIVE                          |                        |     1 |    43 |    61   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWP |            ||
| 15 |          PX SEND HASH                       | :TQ10001               |     1 |    43 |    61   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,01 | P->P | HASH       ||
| 16 |           PX PARTITION RANGE ITERATOR       |                        |     1 |    43 |    61   (0)| 00:00:01 |   KEY |   KEY | Q1,01 | PCWC |            ||
|* 17 |            TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| SHIP_DTL               |     1 |    43 |    61   (0)| 00:00:01 |   KEY |   KEY | Q1,01 | PCWP |            ||
|* 18 |             INDEX RANGE SCAN                | IX_SHIP_DTL_ORD_SEC_NR |    14 |       |    49   (0)| 00:00:01 |   KEY |   KEY | Q1,01 | PCWP |            ||
| 19 |    PARTITION RANGE SINGLE                   |                        |     1 |    39 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |    14 |    14 |        |      |            ||
|* 20 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL                       | AP_SMB_SKU_BASED       |     1 |    39 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |    14 |    14 |        |      |            ||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|Plan for 9i
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Id | Operation                              | Name                   | Rows | Bytes | Cost | Pstart| Pstop | TQ    |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib ||
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                         |     1 |    53 |    74 |       |       |        |      |            ||
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE                        |                         |     1 |    53 |       |       |       |        |      |            ||
|   2 |   FILTER                               |                         |       |       |       |       |       |        |      |            ||
|   3 |    FILTER                              |                         |       |       |       |       |       |        |      |            ||
|   4 |     HASH JOIN SEMI                     |                         |     1 |    53 |    72 |       |       | 30,01 | P->S | QC (RAND) ||
|   5 |      PARTITION RANGE ITERATOR          |                         |       |       |       |   KEY |   KEY | 30,01 | PCWP |            ||
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| SHIP_DTL                |     1 |    42 |    54 |   KEY |   KEY | 30,01 | PCWP |            ||
|   7 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN                | IX_SHIP_DTL_ORD_SEC_NR |    21 |       |    37 |   KEY |   KEY | 30,01 | PCWP |            ||
|   8 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | AP_PL_BU                |     2 |    22 |     2 |       |       | 30,00 | S->P | BROADCAST ||
|   9 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL                   | AP_SMB_SKU_BASED        |     1 |    39 |     2 |    14 |    14 |        |      |            ||
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Extensions Load Slow (Mac) After Latest Photoshop Update

I was wondering if anyone else has experienced the below:
(On Mac - Mavericks) The latest Photoshop CC 2014 update has slowed down the loading of my two extension (these are extensions I have created in HTML5). Prior to the update they loaded fine. Also, when I uninstalled one of the extensions and then reinstall it I get error code -180 (no documentation on this error code), I click ok and then open Photoshop and the extension loads (but slow) and when I quit Extension Manger and reopen it the extension shows it is loaded.
No problems with the extension in Windows 7 after the Photoshop update. The extensions load as before the update.
Also, error code -180 is a mystery. I have searched the web and can find no reference to it. Any idea where Adobe lists their error codes?
Any insights on this issue will be appreciated - Sam
PS - When one of my extension pallets displays a blank window, I click in the pallet and the extension loads. Strange!

Please post your problem to Photoshop General Discussion so that it can reach more people and get better support.

Slow mac after latest security update!!!

So I updated my macbook pro running 10.5.5 to the latest security update and now everything has slowed down! Now I get a beach ball for 5-10 seconds every time I try to open a program, go to a web page, save a file, etc. Is anybody else having this problem???

Hi nerowolfe,
Yes, rest assured you are not alone in your post-update slowdown problems.
I ran back to the steely, solid prowess of Tiger after Leopard indicated it preferred to just sit in the tree sleeping and occasionally falling out. We'll put Leopard down to experience. (The lesson being, if you're embarking on a project, let your developers do the job. Don't re-deploy or scatter your developers mid-way onto more commercial gadgets).
It's a shame but there's now a definite trepidation that comes with OS X software updates. The very rate at which we're being force fed them speaks for itself. Most of the time, I find that they introduce so many other issues that increments in numbers means heartache, searching for fixes, restoration and forgetting the experience. Until the next update, which is the next lap of this downward spiralling track we seem to be on. Do you remember when you could concentrate on your tasks, and not the operating system? (It's becoming difficult).
As for practical solutions nerowolfe, up to now, repairing HD permissions using the OS X inbuilt features or using Onyx has usually done the trick. But neither seem to make a blind bit of difference in the wake of this latest update.
Does anyone else have any practical solutions?
Does anyone know if it's possible to bypass updates or remove installed updates?
MrLinguaFranca.

IPod touch 4G experiencing slow performance after iOS 5.0.1 update.

When iOS 5 was on this iPod, the performance was fairly slower than I expected. Now, since I have updated to 5.0.1 the performance has gotten noticeably worse. Apps crash a lot, especially Safari, opening things like apps, typing in the keyboard and opening the notification centre can be quite unresponsive and sluggish sometimes, and I have also noticed in the Diagnostics an Usage list I get lots of low memory errors, and I think one of these pops up every time an app crashes. I really hope they fix this in the next iOS Update as apps randomly crashing gets quite annoying.

Did you already try to reset the iPod by holding the sleep and home button until the Apple logo comes back again? If this does not help, set it up as new device without using the latest backup.
How to back up your data and set up as a new device

ORA-07445 error, even after latest patch

Windows Server 2003 Ent SP1
8GB Ram
/fastdetect /3GB /NoExecute=OptIn
Oracle 10.2.0.4
Hi,
I have been struggling with the following issue for a while now, and I have not yet been able to find a solution. I would really appreciate anybodies assistance. I was on patch 10.2.0.1, and oracle recommended that I patch to 10.2.0.4. I did that this weekend, but this morning, I had the same error shown below.
Alert log:
Errors in file c:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\rdbms\trace\jde_ora_5788.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x7C82FAF7] [ADDR:0x63006C] [UNABLE_TO_WRITE] []
Mon Mar 23 10:04:40 2009
Errors in file c:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\rdbms\trace\jde_ora_5788.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x7C8224B2] [ADDR:0xCB] [UNABLE_TO_READ] []
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x7C82FAF7] [ADDR:0x63006C] [UNABLE_TO_WRITE] []
Mon Mar 23 10:04:40 2009
Errors in file c:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\rdbms\trace\jde_ora_5788.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x7C8224B2] [ADDR:0xCB] [UNABLE_TO_READ] []
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x7C8224B2] [ADDR:0xCB] [UNABLE_TO_READ] []
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x7C82FAF7] [ADDR:0x63006C] [UNABLE_TO_WRITE] []
Mon Mar 23 10:04:41 2009
Errors in file c:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\rdbms\trace\jde_ora_5788.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x7C832335] [ADDR:0x73006C] [UNABLE_TO_WRITE] []
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x7C8224B2] [ADDR:0xCB] [UNABLE_TO_READ] []
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x7C8224B2] [ADDR:0xCB] [UNABLE_TO_READ] []
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [PC:0x7C82FAF7] [ADDR:0x63006C] [UNABLE_TO_WRITE] []
I have been monitoring the SGA+PGA and it has not gone over 1900M
I have not seen the Oracle instance over 2.1GB
Oracle recommends that I decrease my SGA, but if this is a memory leak issue, wont it just delay the crash with a few minutes?
the 3GB switch is set, so oracle should be able to handle up to 2.7GB.
I will really appreciate any assistance.
Regards

Can you identify the operation or steps that cause this error ? Can you post the contents of the ORA-7445 trace file? There are various reasons why this specific error occurs. See these docs
456305.1 - ORA-7445 [unable_to_trans_pc] on Windows 64-bit Using OLAP/Oracle Express
423064.1 - ORA-7445: [unable_to_trans_pc] Using dbms_java.grant_permission
466370.1 - ora-7445 [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [unable_to_trans_pc] [UNABLE_TO_WRITE] ORA-27301: OS failure message: Not enough storage ORA-27300
433713.1 - Ora-07445: Exception Encountered: Core Dump [Access_violation] after a recent migration
HTH
Srini

MARS slow performance after latest patch?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for