Mass addition accunting entires from PO to FA

Hi
any one please help me to know what are all acunting entires created in mass addition process - from PO to FA
1) I created asset item in the asset orgainsation
2) for example the item is 'Computer laptop' - in purchasing tab - account code is - asset clearing account.
3) I entered purchase order for 'computer laptop' - the distribution account - asset clearing accounting. it is 3 way match.
4) I received the item - 'Computer laptop' - delivered it
5) same PO matched against AP invoice
6) AP invoice distribition account - showed asset clearing account - Tracked as asset is checked
7) Ran the mass addition program
8) in FA through the mass additioin- I add the new assest.
In this case - what are all accounting entires created from receipt of 'computer laptop', delivery of item, matching to AP invoice and Addition of asset. - please write the down accounting entry.
Thanks
venkatesan
Edited by: user11936275 on Jan 20, 2011 8:55 PM

Hi Vekatesan,
For Asset related invoicess , In AP
Credit Liability
Debit Asset Clearing
Mass additions will create the asset with the following entries
Debit Asset account for computer-Laptop
Credit Asset Clearing
Regards
Muthu

Similar Messages

Life in months is not populating from interface in Mass Additions Post

Hi,
We have one critical issue in FA conversion.We have popultaed the life_in_months in fa_mass_additions table.When we run the Mass Additions Post,it is defaulting the life_in_months from category and not from fa_mass_additions interface table.As per intended functionality,it should populate from interface table.
If any of you encounter the issue,Please let me know the soultinon.
Thnaks
Praveen

>
DATA showing on front end,but it is not populating into base table AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL.
>
Are you saying you can see the distributions from front end but not in the table?
Did you populate the distribution related columns in AP_INVOICE_LINES_INTERFACE (e.g. DIST_CODE_COMBINATION_ID)?
Sandeep Gandhi

Loading categories to the mass additions interface

Hi,
We are doing an R12 FA implementation.
If I explain it more detail.
We have 11i , but we r going to scrap 11i and implement R12 fresh.
However the data will be extracted from 11i as it is.
As u all know we need to use either mass additions interface or the additions API. In this case we r going to use mass additions interface.For the conversion we r going to use ODI to map the data.
The isssue we are facing is, since the ODI is going to be used it will map data from 11i base tables to the mass_additions_interface table in R12. The mapping of the categories becomes a major issue in this scenario. Since we cannot load the category combinations to the interface, instead only an ID can be populated.As I told you we r populating the 11i values it will be wrong the populate it with 11i values, because in R12 we will have a new set of category IDs.
Can anyone help me to load the categories ( That exist in R12) to the mass additions interface using ODI? or is there a way using the API?
Thanks and Regards,
MPH

Hi,
I believe you need to define another table which maps the Old Category ID with New one. Use ODI to map the Data and this Temp table to Mass additions.
Regards,
Sridhar

Undelete in Mass Additions Queue=Delete

My business user inadvertently deleted all AP transactions from Mass Additions using Tools==>Delete All. The transactions were in queue 'New' but now are in queue 'delete'. Is there a way to put them in the 'New' queue again. No post process has happened as of yet. The trasactions were sent by AP using Mass Additions process.
Thanks in Advance!
mtm

Hi,
We could find the work around for deletion of assets which are in POST Status.
We edited the Description of the Asset and saved it again.This way it allowed to Delete the Mass additions which got stuck with POST status.
Thanks

Assets Mass Addition error-APP-OFA-48400

Hi,
We are working on Oracle Applications 11i. The Assets user have run the post mass additions and the Mass Additions post gave no output when it completes successfully (POST MASS ADDITIONS REPORT and two of the MASS ADDITIONS POST resulted in error before the thired one completes successfully) and there is still one item X in the POST queue in the mass additions.
Item X was one of two items in the same PO and same invoice the second item Y was POSTED successfully and now has an asset number.
I have checked the po charge accounts, ap expense account and fa clearing account and they match.
Any clues?
This matter is urgernt please due to the period closing.
Found the following error in one of the logs:
At least one of the child requests failed.
Cause: At least one of the child requests spawned to run Mass Additions Post failed.
Action: Check the Mass Additions Post log files to find out what caused the request to fail.
Error: function famgpi returned failure (called from FAMAPT)
APP-OFA-48400: Error: function famgpi returned failure (called from FAMAPT)
Edited by: AHS on Feb 4, 2010 1:37 AM
Edited by: AHS on Feb 4, 2010 1:48 AM

Thank you for your help.
unfortunately, i have no access to metalink these days.
We had also the following error ; on the attempt to open the assignment form of the item:
APP-OFA-48317: the employee to which this distribution line is assigned is no longer valid.
when the form opens there is no emmploye visible in the assignment line.
and in the table FA_MASSADD_DISTRIBUTIONS an employee_id is there.
So, I chose an employee in the form and saved it, then I cleared the employee from the line and saved again.
Finally the problem is solved.

Mass Additions Posting Report customization

Hi,
I am customizing a standard report that has one mandatory parameter. Requirement is to make the report available for all SOBs by removing the parameter. Report is "Mass Additions Posting Report" (FAS824.rdf). While trying to remove the P_BOOK parameter in the standard RDF, I am unable to derive values for "Accounting_Flex_Structure" variable as it is being derived using the P_BOOK value. This particular value is coming from "FA_BOOK_CONTROLS.accounting_flex_structure". I am unable to group it with the main group in the RDF which is using "FA_SYSTEM_CONTROLS". There is no link for FA_SYSTEM_CONTROLS to any table where I can join it with FA_BOOK_CONTROLS to derive "Accounting_Flex_Structure" and make the report run for all SOBs. Please help.
Thanks in advance.
Kiran

I think you can use database trigger, Whenever they are running the Mass Additions posting, the trigger will submit the concurrent request (FAS824) in a loop, use Fnd_Request.submit_request by the particular SOB parameter, hope this can help you
br,
thanks

Fixed Assets Mass Addition

Hi,
We have the below requirement in 11i:
When there is a mass addition, there should be an option to assign accounting code combinations at a category or setup level so that it defaults to all items on a divisional accounting basis. This is to enable divisional accounting for Balance Sheet and Depreciation (Profit & Loss).
Is this possible using standard functionality?
thanks.
S.Sriram

Hi
I am using Solution beacon vision instance and have tried entering an asset using mass additions and below are my observations:
I entered the Asset book, Transaction date, asset category, number of units and than clicked on the Assignments button and entered the Expense Account and Location.
For the expense acount the system is automatically defaulting the following:
Company Segment Value - 01 as company value (since the default value has been set at the Key Flexfields segments window)
Account Segment Value - Depreciation expense account (This value is being defaulted from the Asset category window based on the Category setup)
Sub-Account - Defaulted as 0000 (since the default value has been set at the Key Flexfields segments window)
Product - Defaulted as 0000 (since the default value has been set at the Key Flexfields segments window)
The system is prompting me to enter the value for the department segment as it is not automatically defaulted. (No Default value has been set at the Key flexfields segments window)
I didnt find a place where in i can see the asset clearing account or cip clearing account was being asked or used while creating mass additions.
When the asset is being brought from other module such as Payables, than the Asset clearing account or CIP Clearing account would have been entered at the Invoice distributions level and that is being brought into the Mass additions window and is displayed in the source tab screen.
But apart from the above i have not been able to find a tab/field wherein system asks or prompt me to enter the other accounts as mentioned by you.
Based on the above, do you find any difference of what you might be seeing or the accounts being defaulted.
Thanks and Regards
Manish Jain.

Mass addition transfer

Hello,
What are the conditions to transfer items to FA?
Is that the combination that have same category in FA?
If the line in distribution in AP is matched to PO and has an item that defined "Fixed asset" - it will transfer to FA ?
thanks,
Kobi Idah

For doing the Mass Transfer in Fixed Assets the following conditions is to be met.
a) Define the Asset Category for that Asset.
b) If it is matched to PO, then in the Charge account you need to choose the Asset Clearing Account only.
c) When the Invoice been matched to Purchase Order, make ensure from the Show->Field-> Track as Asset need to be enabled otherwise the payables distributions will not be identified as a 'Asset'.
d) Validate an Invoice
e) Account an Invoice.
f) Payable Transfer to General Ledger.- Report Need to be run.
g) Run the Report
-- Mass Addition Create
-- Mass Addition Create Report.
Navigate to Fixed Asset Module.
Go to Prepare Mass Addition.
Query with your asset book / Invoice Number.
Change the status from Queue to Post.
Go to Post Mass Addition.
Choose your Asset Book and submit the concurrent.
Make ensure these concurrents should complete Normal.
I have also mentioned the Accountign entries at different stages--
In Purchasing Module
Expense accural a/c Dr
Asset Clearing a/c.
In Payables Module
Asset Cost a/c
To Liability
In Fixed Assets Module
Asset Clearing a/c
To Asset Cost

MASS ADDITIONS POST 시 DR/CR 계정이 안 생기는경우

제품 : FIN_FA
작성날짜 : 2003-12-02
MASS ADDITIONS POST 시 DR/CR 계정이 안 생기는경우
========================================
PURPOSE
Mass Additions Post 에 의해 생기는 DR/CR clearing accounts 가
merged mass additions lines에서는 잘 안생기는 경우가 있다. 이에 대한
해결책을 제시한다.
Problem Description
다음 Query문으로
DR/CR Clearing Accounts 가 안생기는 자산을 찾을수 있다.
select distinct th.asset_id "ID",th.book_type_code "BOOK"
,th.invoice_transaction_id "TRX_ID"
,ai.fixed_assets_cost "COST"
,ai.payables_code_combination_id "CC_ID"
from fa_transaction_headers th,
fa_asset_invoices ai,
fa_deprn_periods dp
where (th.transaction_type_code = 'ADJUSTMENT'
or th.transaction_type_code = 'ADDITION')
and dp.book_type_code = th.book_type_code
and dp.period_close_date is not null
and th.date_effective between
dp.period_open_date and nvl(dp.period_close_date, sysdate)
and th.asset_id = ai.asset_id
and th.invoice_transaction_id = ai.invoice_transaction_id_in
and ai.payables_code_combination_id = gcc.code_combination_id
and (0 =
(select sum (ai1.fixed_assets_cost)
from fa_asset_invoices ai1
where th.asset_id = ai1.asset_id
and th.invoice_transaction_id = ai1.invoice_transaction_id_in
and ai1.fixed_assets_cost != 0
and ( ai1.merged_code = 'MC'
or ai1.merged_code = 'MP')))
and not exists
( select ad2.transaction_header_id
from fa_adjustments ad2,
fa_asset_invoices ai2
where th.asset_id = ad2.asset_id
and th.asset_id = ai2.asset_id
and th.invoice_transaction_id = ai2.invoice_transaction_id_in
and th.book_type_code = ad2.book_type_code
and th.transaction_header_id = ad2.transaction_header_id
and ( ad2.source_type_code = 'ADJUSTMENT'
or ad2.source_type_code = 'ADDITION')
and ad2.adjustment_type = 'COST CLEARING'
and ad2.code_combination_id = ai2.payables_code_combination_id
and ad2.adjustment_amount = ai2.fixed_assets_cost );
Workaround
한꺼번에 넘어오는 Invoice들중 먼저 하나를 Asset으로 등록하고 나머지 Invoice들을 기존 자산에 'Add to Asset' 을 이용하여 등록한다.
Solution Description
Apply 11i.FA.J (2230269) 이상에서 해결되었다.
Reference Documents
205765.1

Hi
Supplier invoice debit an account XXXX. This should be a CIP account (construction in progress), which is an Asset type account in GL.
When you capitalize the project, the system is populating the mass addition 'clearing account' field with the account debited by Projects (in your case, by AP). This will be the XXXX account.
The Expense Account should be the account you intend to charge periodic depreciation costs.
The Asset Account should be the account you intend to charge the value (the cost) of the asset in GL balance sheet.
Both, expense and asset, accounts are derived from the asset category.
If you have not defined asset categories, the system will use the default accounts from the system implementation setup.
Usually when you create an asset in Projects, before capitalizing, you are expected to setup the asset category. Asset category derives accounting and depreciation method.
Dina

Mass Additions Description

Hello
Can we maximize the description that is being transferred from AP Distribution to Fixed Asset Mass Additions? If so, how?
jann

I mean the number of characters that can be copied from AP.. I think the current number of characters allowed now for Mass Additions description is only 80.. Can we make it 150 or more?
thanks

Mass Additions WEB ADI Issue

All,
Has anyone come across a need to modify the mass additions upload via web adi, to do validation on asset numbers. We find that if we use web adi to mass additions, the error of duplicate asset numbers is only picked up when we do a post. Our users require that validation, when they do the upload from web adi. As this was a functionality that desktop adi provided.
Any help here would be much appreciated.

Hi
Can you think about one work around
1. Import Asset table containing Asset Number before uploading the asset using Web ADI.
2. Compare the Imported data with Web ADI Template using EXCEL macro check or using a sql script
Have you loged SR & wether Oracle can think of some Validation (as this is the standard functionality) ?
Regards
Sunil Kumar

Necessary to empty Mass-Addition Workbench before run Depreciation?

Hi!
Is it necessary to empty the Mass-Addition Transactions in Workbench before the Depreciation Run will be started or the Period will be closed?
Which impact does it have if few Transactions will remain in the Mass-Addition Workbench? Because till Depreciation - Run or Month End Closing it will be not possible to finish editing all Mass Additions Transactions.
Thank you!
kind regards
Evelyn

Hi
Answer can be both Yes and No
Case I : Say you have pending transaction for the current period in Mass Addition, then it is required to post them before running depreciation and they can't be processed later.
Case II: If you have future trsanctions in mass addition, no need to worry . when you will close the period depreciation request set will run Proces sPending Transactions and will post any elligible lines from mass addtiions
Thanks
Sunil

Diff betw FA Mass addition interaface and FA_ADDITION_PUB.DO_ADDITION API

Hi
Can anyone tell me the major difference between FA MASS ADDITION INTERFCAE and FA_ADDITION_PUB.DO_ADDITION API and which one would you recomend to uses for loading assets from legacy system and why?

Hi
Can anyone tell me the major difference between FA MASS ADDITION INTERFCAE and FA_ADDITION_PUB.DO_ADDITION API and which one would you recomend to uses for loading assets from legacy system and why?

Fa mass additions (fa_addition_pub.do_addition)

Hi All,
I am working on Mass Addition interface. After successfull execution of fa_addition_pub.do_addition package.I got asset_id too..
output :-
S 0
SUCCESS
THID 167215
ASSET_ID 109950
ASSET_NUMBER 99339
But my issue is i am not able to get this data in fa_mass_addition table ...In which table this data is updated ?
How to get the data in Fa Mass Addition so that i can run 'post mass addition' to get status as posted..?
Your knowledge will be appreciable..
Thanks
Raman Sharma

FA_ADDITIONS_B table in the FA
but will u provide the script or review mine ..
/* Formatted on 2012/05/23 14:19 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */
DECLARE
-- CURSOR C1
-- IS
-- SELECT *
-- FROM MCB_FA_TABLE;
P_API_VERSION NUMBER;
P_INIT_MSG_LIST VARCHAR2 (200);
P_COMMIT VARCHAR2 (200);
P_VALIDATION_LEVEL NUMBER;
X_RETURN_STATUS VARCHAR2 (200);
X_MSG_COUNT NUMBER;
X_MSG_DATA VARCHAR2 (200);
P_CALLING_FN VARCHAR2 (200);
PX_ASSET_DIST_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_DIST_REC_TYPE;
PX_TRANS_REC FA_API_TYPES.TRANS_REC_TYPE;
PX_DIST_TRANS_REC FA_API_TYPES.TRANS_REC_TYPE;
PX_ASSET_HDR_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_HDR_REC_TYPE;
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_DESC_REC_TYPE;
PX_ASSET_TYPE_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_TYPE_REC_TYPE;
PX_ASSET_CAT_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_CAT_REC_TYPE;
PX_ASSET_HIERARCHY_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_HIERARCHY_REC_TYPE;
PX_ASSET_FIN_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_FIN_REC_TYPE;
PX_ASSET_DEPRN_REC FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_DEPRN_REC_TYPE;
PX_ASSET_DIST_TBL FA_API_TYPES.ASSET_DIST_TBL_TYPE;
PX_INV_TBL FA_API_TYPES.INV_TBL_TYPE;
LV_COUNT NUMBER := 1;
L_MESG_COUNT VARCHAR2 (2000);
L_MESG VARCHAR2 (2000);
L_RETURN_STATUS VARCHAR2 (2000);
PX_INV_RATE_TBL FA_API_TYPES.INV_RATE_TBL_TYPE;
PX_INV_REC FA_API_TYPES.INV_REC_TYPE;
PX_INV_TRANS_REC FA_API_TYPES.INV_TRANS_REC_TYPE;
BEGIN
BEGIN
FA_SRVR_MSG.INIT_SERVER_MESSAGE;
FND_MSG_PUB.INITIALIZE;
END;
P_API_VERSION := 1.0;
P_INIT_MSG_LIST := FND_API.G_FALSE;
P_COMMIT := FND_API.G_FALSE;
P_VALIDATION_LEVEL := FND_API.G_VALID_LEVEL_FULL;
X_RETURN_STATUS := L_RETURN_STATUS;
X_MSG_COUNT := L_MESG_COUNT;
X_MSG_DATA := L_MESG;
P_CALLING_FN := NULL;
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC------------------------------------------------------
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.ASSET_NUMBER := 'XPRIA1100'; ---FA.ASSET_NUMBER;
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.DESCRIPTION := 'Xperia Mobile'; ---FA.DESCRIPTION;
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.ASSET_KEY_CCID := 2; ---FA.ASSET_KEY;
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.TAG_NUMBER := NULL; ---FA.TAG_NUMBER;
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.SERIAL_NUMBER := NULL; ---FA.SERIAL_NUMBER;
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.MANUFACTURER_NAME := NULL; ---FA.MANUFACTURER_NAME;
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.MODEL_NUMBER := NULL; ---FA.MODEL_NUMBER;
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.IN_USE_FLAG := 'YES'; ---FA.IN_USE_FLAG;
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.INVENTORIAL := 'YES'; ---FA.INVENTORIAL;
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.OWNED_LEASED := 'OWNED'; --FA.OWNED_LEASED;
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.NEW_USED := 'NEW'; ---FA.NEW_USED;
PX_ASSET_DESC_REC.CURRENT_UNITS := '10'; ---FA.CURRENT_UNITS;
PX_ASSET_CAT_REC-------------------------------------------------------
PX_ASSET_CAT_REC.CATEGORY_ID := 21; ---FA.CATEGORY_ID;
PX_ASSET_CAT_REC.DESC_FLEX.ATTRIBUTE1 := NULL; ---FA.ATTRIBUTE1;
PX_ASSET_CAT_REC.DESC_FLEX.ATTRIBUTE2 := NULL; ---FA.ATTRIBUTE2;
PX_ASSET_CAT_REC.DESC_FLEX.CONTEXT := 'COMPUTER-PC'; ---FA.CONTEXT;
PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.COST := 2400; ---FA.COST;
PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.ORIGINAL_COST := 2400; ---FA.ORIGINAL_COST;
PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.SALVAGE_VALUE := NULL; ---FA.SALVAGE_VALUE;
PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.DATE_PLACED_IN_SERVICE := SYSDATE; --- FA.DATE_PLACED_SRV;
PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.DEPRECIATE_FLAG := NULL; ---FA.DEP_FLAG;
PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.DEPRN_METHOD_CODE := NULL; ---FA.DEP_METHOD_CODE;
PX_ASSET_FIN_REC.LIFE_IN_MONTHS := NULL; ---FA.LIFE_IN_MONTHS;
PX_ASSET_DEPRN_REC.YTD_DEPRN := NULL; ---FA.YTD_DEP;
PX_ASSET_DEPRN_REC.DEPRN_RESERVE := NULL; ---FA.DEP_RESERVE;
PX_ASSET_HDR_REC.BOOK_TYPE_CODE := 'OPS CORP'; ---FA.BOOK_TYPE_CODE;
PX_ASSET_DIST_REC.UNITS_ASSIGNED := NULL; ---FA.UNITS_ASSIGNED;
PX_ASSET_DIST_REC.EXPENSE_CCID := NULL; ---FA.EXPENSE_CCID;
PX_ASSET_DIST_REC.LOCATION_CCID := NULL; ---FA.LOCATION_CCID;
PX_ASSET_DIST_REC.TRANSACTION_UNITS := NULL;
--PX_ASSET_DIST_REC.UNITS_ASSIGNED;
PX_ASSET_DIST_TBL (1) := PX_ASSET_DIST_REC;
PX_INV_TBL (1) := PX_INV_REC;
--l_inv_rec.source_line_id := i.source_line_id;
PX_INV_REC.FIXED_ASSETS_COST := 2400; ---I.FIXED_ASSETS_COST;
PX_INV_REC.PAYABLES_COST := 2400; ---I.PAYABLES_COST;
PX_INV_REC.PAYABLES_CODE_COMBINATION_ID := NULL;
---I.PAYABLES_CODE_COMBINATION_ID;
PX_INV_REC.INVOICE_NUMBER := NULL; ---I.INVOICE_NUMBER;
PX_INV_REC.PO_NUMBER := NULL; ---I.PO_NUMBER;
PX_INV_REC.UNREVALUED_COST := NULL; ---I.UNREVALUED_COST;
PX_INV_REC.PROJECT_ID := NULL; ---I.PROJECT_ID;
PX_INV_REC.TASK_ID := NULL; ---I.TASK_ID;
PX_INV_REC.DELETED_FLAG := 'NO'; ---I.DELETED_FLAG;
PX_INV_REC.DESCRIPTION := NULL; ---I.DESCRIPTION;
PX_INV_REC.PO_VENDOR_ID := NULL; ---I.PO_VENDOR_ID;
PX_INV_REC.AP_DISTRIBUTION_LINE_NUMBER := NULL;
---I.AP_DISTRIBUTION_LINE_NUMBER;
PX_INV_REC.PAYABLES_UNITS := NULL; ---I.PAYABLES_UNITS;
PX_INV_REC.INVOICE_ID := NULL; ---I.INVOICE_ID;
PX_INV_REC.INVOICE_DATE := NULL; ---I.INVOICE_DATE;
PX_ASSET_TYPE_REC------------------------------------------------------
PX_ASSET_TYPE_REC.ASSET_TYPE := 'CAPITALIZED'; ---FA.ASSET_TYPE;
PX_INV_TRANS_REC.TRANSACTION_TYPE := 2; ---TRANSACTION_TYPE_CODE;
-- PX_DIST_TRANS_REC := NULL; Modify the code to initialize this parameter
-- PX_ASSET_TYPE_REC := NULL; Modify the code to initialize this parameter
-- PX_ASSET_HIERARCHY_REC := NULL; Modify the code to initialize this parameter
-- PX_ASSET_FIN_REC := NULL; Modify the code to initialize this parameter
-- PX_ASSET_DEPRN_REC := NULL; Modify the code to initialize this parameter
-- PX_ASSET_DIST_TBL := NULL; Modify the code to initialize this parameter
APPS.FA_ADDITION_PUB.DO_ADDITION (P_API_VERSION
, P_INIT_MSG_LIST
, P_COMMIT
, P_VALIDATION_LEVEL
, X_RETURN_STATUS
, X_MSG_COUNT
, X_MSG_DATA
, P_CALLING_FN
, PX_TRANS_REC
, PX_DIST_TRANS_REC
, PX_ASSET_HDR_REC
, PX_ASSET_DESC_REC
, PX_ASSET_TYPE_REC
, PX_ASSET_CAT_REC
, PX_ASSET_HIERARCHY_REC
, PX_ASSET_FIN_REC
, PX_ASSET_DEPRN_REC
, PX_ASSET_DIST_TBL
, PX_INV_TBL
, PX_INV_RATE_TBL
-- END LOOP;
LV_COUNT := LV_COUNT + 1;
COMMIT;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE ( X_RETURN_STATUS
|| ' - '
|| X_MSG_COUNT
|| ' - '
|| X_MSG_DATA
L_MESG := 'FAILED (' || SQLERRM || '): ' || L_MESG;
END;
it returns with a message ( E - 1 - OFA )
which is not descriptive at all

Undelete Mass Additions - Queue 'delete'

My business user inadvertently deleted all AP transactions from Mass Additions using Tools==>Delete All. The transactions were in queue 'New' but now are in queue 'delete'. Is there a way to put them in the 'New' queue again. No post process has happened as of yet. The trasactions were sent by AP using Mass Additions process.
Thanks in Advance!
mtm

Hi,
We could find the work around for deletion of assets which are in POST Status.
We edited the Description of the Asset and saved it again.This way it allowed to Delete the Mass additions which got stuck with POST status.
Thanks

Mass addition accunting entires from PO to FA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for