Mass PO maintainance for IO in Acct Assgnment

In MEMASSPO I am trying to change the details of IO number . But I am not geeting the respective field there. Is it not possible to change the IOno, GL no etc from Mass PO maintainance?
Please suggest.

Hi
In Mass Maintenance we can amend the account assignment category, but we cannot amend below fields:(Relerated to Account assignement category)
Cost center
GL code
IOrder
WBS Element
Asset
Network & etc
Regards
Prasanna

Similar Messages

Mass Maintain for F-04 Post For Clearing

Hi SAP Expert,
Is there any mass maintain for transaction F-04 Post For Clearing
i have about 1500 data ( debit and credit ). if i do manually entering i need to enter about 1500 times then save the document, i have using LSMW to pum the 1500 line item data but the LSMW got error,
When i recording i'm using two data and save, in the live it grap two data and save, actually i'm need to enter about 1500 in one document number,
please assist

HI
If your requirement is for clearing the open items in a GL account please use F.13 which will do automatic clearing.You need not select each and every line item via F-04.
Good luck
Hari

No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds

Hi All,
I have the following issue when trying to carry out inventory clearing using LI21.
When I carry this out for Plant B all is OK.
When I try it for Plant 'A' I get the following error.
No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds A and B.
When I clear inventory from plant A why would the system look at plant B?
This does not occur when clearing from plant 'B'.
I am convinced it must be a WM setup issue, but could be FI.
I am not a WM guy but need to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Stuart

In LI21 system will pick up the quantity from storage type 999.
It will clear this storage type and tie up the WM-IM stock for a particular plant.
This error message which u have mentioned usually comes when u are doing a stock transfer between 2 plants in different company codes.
system looks for a GL account in transaction type BUV in tcode OBYA.
Check this setting also .

No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds RTIL and RCP

Dear sir
i am stock transfer in one plant ot another plant on 301MVT use in MB1B t code that time below error is showing
No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds RTIL and RCPL.

Hi,Since you are doing 301 for plants in 2 different company codes you need to maintain CC clearing account,it will not required if do this scenario in same company code, Maintain the Company code Clearing account between 2 company codes through transaction OBYA with proper GL account.

No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds 1000 and 000

Dear all,
I am doing STO between company codes with UB doc type, and I am getting error as " No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds 1000 and 0001."
how to resolve this. plz give steps?
Regards,
Prashanth

Hi...
AS per me OBYA is the Transaction code to maintain account
determination for Cross company code Transactions.
Plz go ahed & confirm.
S..tosh.

No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds 8490 and 062

Hi,
Error when iam doing the PGI:
No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds 8490 and 0627.
What settins are missings. This delivery is normal delivery only.

Hi,
If you are doing intercompany transaction then you need to assign GL accounts in tcode OBYA.

PGI-No Accounts maintained for company code clearing between company codes

Dear Expetrs,
When i am doing PGI getting error that is no accts maintained for company code clearing between 0010 to 0035. This is intercompany process. In our intercompany company codes is 0010 and 0020. So we maintained already clearing acconuts between 0010 and 0020 in OBYA. But when am doing post goods issue... getting error no accts maintained between 0010 to 0035. Actually here supposed to take clearing accts between 0010 to 0020. I couldnt understand why its taking 0010 to 0035. Could you please suggest me where i did mistake, Please suggest me ASAP.
Tanks & Regards,
VS

Dear Lakshmipathi,
Here am pasted the OBYA Screen...whatever i maintain pls check and suggest me. i am suspecting on Debit posting kes and credit posting keys maintain as 01 and 31 is corect.
Transaction          BUV   Clearing between company codes
Posted in             0016
Cleared against       0013
Debit posting key    01                  Credit posting key   31
Account debit        7790000013          Account credit       7720000013
Posted in             0013
Cleared against       0016
Debit posting key    01                  Credit posting key   31
Account debit        7790000016          Account credit       7720000016
Thanks & Regards,
Vasu

Report Slow Due to Mass Data , Soln for Performance Tuning

Dear All,
I am making report with mass data so for this i have to put For All enteries in & Ranges at lodz of places.
1. For all enteries in is making my report works very slow.
2. If i change for all enteries by Ranges then if the no. of records are large the system will thn
throw dump.
If the no. of records are large or the logic applied in complex then report is taking very long
execution time , Can anyone suggest me the method by which i can optimize my report and make it
run smoother in performance.
Thanks
Ankesh Jindal

Hi,
>
Ankesh Jindal wrote:
> The problem is with FAE and ranges acc to uptill i have discovered,
> As I have mentioned if I take FAE and number of records are large the execution will take
> very large amount of time for that i have changed FAE to ranges but still if no. of records are
> large in ranges system will throw dump
>
so far so good. SQL statements must not get too large.
>
Ankesh Jindal wrote:
> so the best soln for this which i have considered for
> my reports is to use ranges but with some logic applied that is ;
> suppose i have 20,000 records then send data to ranges in 3k or 4k lots .
> so in this case i am using ranges with 3k or 4k lots so the sytem will not throw dump and i will get
> faster execution of query with ranges...
>
General question: How big is the runtime difference for your SELECT with Range (4k) and the default FAE (5 in case of ORACLE)... more than 20%? could you post your actual run time figures?
Your range approach is faster because you do less database calls. 5 db calls if you have 4 k entries in the range.
You can influence the number of database calls as well for the FAE.
Assuming you are running on ORACLE with a default configuration you have 5 entries per call.
(Parameters rsdb/max_in_blocking_factor, rsdb/max_blocking_factor). So you will end up
with 4000 db calls with 5 records each.
You compare that with 5 db calls with 4000 records for your range... this is not fair
Hint your FAE with this, this would lead to 5 db calls for the FAE as well.:
%_hints oracle '&max_in_blocking_factor 4000&'.
now compare again... .
Note1: Be care full with big ranges and blocking factors... cost based optimizers may react sensitive to big inlists or or concatenations and may change plans suddenly... .
Note2: If you are not on ORACLE your blocking factors may be considerably higher (30, 60, ...).
Kind regards,
Hermann

Message no. 8I766 Number Ranges are not maintained For Extended Withholding

Dear All,
I am facing the following problem when i am trying to generate the withholding tax certificate
1.) Message no. 8I766 Number Ranges are not maintained For Extended Withholding Tax
     Number Ranges are not maintained for Business Place and Section. Check entries in tables J_1iewt_cert (for Business Place) or J_1iewt_cert_n (for Section Code) and j_1iewt_certno in EWT.
I have checked all the above tables and found that the entries are maintained
2) When i am trying for print priview and then print its generating spool request and the certificate is getting saved -
> here the following problems are faced
      A) . TDS Number is not coming
      B).Details Of the tax deductor ( Name , Adress , TDS Circle , TAN & PAN is not coming Where       to update these details
      C) In Amount Paid / Credited Column - Some fixed amount is comming irrespective of the actual amount credited
Please help me in soving the above issues
Thanks & Regards
Arun.R

Hi
You need to maintain Section Code wise number range . Go to Sm30 Select Table J_1IEWT_CERT_N and maintain it.
Thanks
GG

I have 1 apple id for iTunes store and a different one for my iCloud acct. How can I watch my photo stream on apple tv and be connected to the iTunes store

I have 1 apple id for iTunes store and a different one for my iCloud acct. How can I watch my photo stream on apple tv and be connected to the iTunes store

Use the same Apple ID for everything.

Fiscal year variant is not maintained for calendar year 2009

Hi,
After upgrade to BI 7.0 we are getting error: "Fiscal year variant & is not maintained for calendar year 2009" while opening a query through Bex Analyzer.
Basically it is happening like when we open a particular query, the Variable selection screen comes up, then on clicking the exection button (after selection) it shows SYSTEM_FAILURE exception & clicking the details button, shows the message ""Fiscal year variant is not maintained for calendar year 2009"
Please provide some information/resolution to this.
Thanks,
Shantanu.

HI,
Please ensure that you have defined your fiscal year variant in OB29
correctly. It is necessary that:
1. the previous year has been maintained,
2. an entry for Dec 31 exists in each fiscal year,
3. the following fiscal year has been maintained.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Nitin

Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012

I am getting this error while scheduling infopackage for 2lis_02_HDR.
Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012
PLease let me know how to solve thhe issue.
Thanks,
harika.

Hi,
Where are you geting error, before execution or duing execution of DTP in the log.
Check if you have transferred fiscal year variants from source system to BW. Then trigger DTP.
Regards,
Pravin Karkhanis.
Edited by: Pravin Karkhanis on Oct 18, 2011 4:15 AM
Edited by: Pravin Karkhanis on Oct 18, 2011 4:15 AM

Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012 when loadin

Dear Experts,
We are working on BI7.0 extracting data from ECC 6.0.
I am trying to load data from 0HR_PY_PP_1 which is a Self DataSource in our BW System (extracts data from 0EMPLOYEE and 0PERSON) to load into ZPA_C50 which is a copy of BCT InfoCube 0PAPA_C02 (Headcount).
The data has come through into the PSA very well.
However, DTP is throwing an error while loading 32242 records of data from PSA into ZPA_C50 InfoCube. The error details as below:
Error while updating to target ZPA_C50 (type INFOCUBE)
Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012 FGV 2
Messages for 1 data records saved; request is red acc. to configuration
Processing Terminated
We are actually doing a Re-implementation of BW 3.0b in BI 7.0 Ehp1. We have imported Maintenance of Fiscal Year Variant from the BW 3.0b Production System. So this shouldn't be a problem I guess since I have also checked the setting in SPRO in BI 7.0 Development (New) System and they are looking good.
Also, when I do a Filter on 0CALDAY in DTP from 01.01.1900 to 31.12.2010, the loads are working fine. I want the load to run without any Filters on 0CALDAY.
Has anyone been in similar situation. How did you resolve this issue? Your time is very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Chandu

Dear Experts
Thanks for your time.
We have resolved this issue ourselves. We have maintained 'Shortened Fiscal Years' for 'Z1' and it is working fine now. Steps are as below:
In BI Dev System -> SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG -> SAP Customizing Implementation Guide -> SAP NetWeaver -> Business Intelligence -> General BI Settings -> Maintain fiscal year variant -> Select 'Z1' Fiscal Year Variant and then DoubleClick on 'Shortened Fiscal Years' to set the Fisc Year Variant -> Save.
The dataload should work fine now.
Cheers,
Chandu

Populate Error Message while submitting Travel Request if Supervisor(A002) relationship is not maintained for employee

Hi Team,
We have a requirement to "Populate Error Message(Supervisor not Maintained) while submitting Travel Request if Supervisor(A002) relationship is not maintained for employee in ESS.
We are using standard WDA application - FITV_REQUEST and standard travel request workfow - WS20000050.
Please suggest how to do this.
Thanks,
Ravi

Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for the reply...
We created enhancement for FM HRTRV_IF_GET_CUSTOMIZING and written code in that.
So by this if Logged in Employee is not assgned with Line Manager , it will throw error while accessing "Create Travel Request application".
Thanks,
Ravi.

Error message "Data cannot be maintained for set type COMM_PR_PUR_1

Hi
While replicating the material master through R3AS I am getting an error for which the details to be checked in SMW01. In SMW01 when I selected the record for error details I am getting above error message. How to resolve ? Pls guide me stepwise. For your information I has cleared SMQ1 in R3 & SMQ2 in SRM
For curioisity next I selected all such error logs & deleted. It gave me one warning (some inconstinecies error) which I ignored. After that I checked SMQ1 of R3 & SMQ2 of SRM. No log
But I observed a strange thing. Whatever material codes I am creating it is going straightway to SRM without running R3AS transaction. I checked R3AM1, selected the row and cancelled. But still going without any interferrance. Why ? How shall I stop this.
Thanks

Hello,
>
BNR wrote:
> Hi
> While replicating the material master through R3AS I am getting an error for which the details to be checked in SMW01. In SMW01 when I selected the record for error details I am getting above error message. How to resolve ? Pls guide me stepwise. For your information I has cleared SMQ1 in R3 & SMQ2 in SRM
>(...)
Have a look at OSS note 1049693 - Data cannot be maintained for set type COMM_PR_PUR_1.
Regards.
Laurent.

Mass PO maintainance for IO in Acct Assgnment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for