Mass variant changes

Hi experts
Is there any way to make the mass changes in the variants created for standard as well as z reports. I had created variant for all periods of 2009 year. Now i want to create variant for 2010 year but in one go (by making mass changes). Pls let me know how can i do that.
Thanks in advance.
Deepak Mehmi

Creating variants of reports in mass is not possible. You only have to go manually and maintain the variants for each program/job etc.
But I have one question. Why do you want to change the variant every year. If year is the only variable which changes everytime (other variables are fixed anyway), you can always create dynamic variants for the jobs once for all, and it will take care of the year by itself.
When you save the variant you can see the column Selection variable and Name of the variable for the specific field and you can maintain your values there. Once done, it will automatically take care of the year.

Similar Messages

  • Standard tcode for (mass) data change of internal orders or ... ??

    Hi!
    I really need some info if there by any chance SAP has standard transaction for mass data change of internal orders (more particular, distribution rules in settlement rule section, which can be found in <b>KO02 transaction</b>  ).
    I am trying to change distribution rules for settlement receivers in <b>settlement rule section</b>, that is finish past distribution rules by filling TO PERIOD and TO FISCAL YEAR fields on the right of each rule, and then entering new rules (which i get from external source -flat file, ms excel, csv...).
    If i wanted to import data in SAP i guess i would have to develop a Batch Input. But that would take me some time to develop because it is pretty complicated.
    I found tcode KO08 but i do not really know how to use it. Maybe there is another tcode that i am not aware of?
    I would appreciate any suggestions!
    Thnx, UK

    Hi Srilakshimi,
    If you are familiar with MASS transaction, then you can modify User Responsible field for Internal Orders from transaction KOK2.
    As first step you must create a selection variant in order to define which orders you want to modify. Once selection variant was created, excute transaction with it and you'll get a screen similar to MASS transaction. Select the field you want and massively replace it. Do not forget to save.
    Best Regards!
    Mgitur

  • Mass price change for inforecord

    Hi All,
    Can I do a mass price change for inforecords? We are in ECC 6.0....
    I have checked transaction MEMASSIN but there is no field for price in this txn.
    Regards,
    V S

    Yes it is Possible. But, not thru any Mass Transactions.
    You need to Perform a BDC for ME12. Go to ME12 and Select Conditions Tab and Select the Gross Price Condition and Click on remove Line and Create New Gross Condition with New Price and Per Unit.
    Hope it will Solve ur Query.

  • Mass price change

    hi ,
    Is there any Std T.code to do Mass price Change of Materials ?
    regards
    Mike

    Hi,
    You also have Tcode MASS for more mass modification.
    Use object type BUS1001 and generate. Then you have to know the tables where the field you want to modify is.
    Pick the fields in their folder and generate again. Then in selection pick the materials or use other selection criteria. Generate again.
    In the upper side of the screen insert the data and click the button 'carry out a mass change'.
    Follow the link for screen shots
    http://www.sap123.com/showthread.php?t=172&goto=nextoldest

  • Variant change history log  in T-code KE28 .

    Hi,
    Variant change history log needs to be found for the Variant XYZ used in T-code KE28 .If any body know the procedure could you please reply .
    Regards
    Srihari

    hi mythily,
    you mean to say that, the user has manually inputed a billing date (rather than the one captured automatically) and created this cancelled invoice..?
    Or the user has changed the billing date after this cancelled invoice was created..?
    If its the first case, i dont think there is any log created for this.
    Regards
    Jobi

  • PCD inspector (Mass property change)

    Hi!
    We encountered strange "problem".
    We have a role with lots of KM iviews, those iviews are pointing to a different places in KM.
    In some of them path property is like "/documents/Public Documents/...", in other ones it's like "/documents/Public%20Documents/...". It happened because initial error in path, that then was reproduced by delta links (and those links were then edited, so it's not possible to chenge only initial object).
    So, the question is... Is it possible to somehow mass-change only a part of 'path' property? Something like "change all 'Public%20Documents' to 'Public Documents' in all iViews in a given folder".
    Am I describing question clear?
    Thanks in advance for help!
    Regards,
    DK

    Hi Dennis,
      Please go thru the  PDF<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4ee6d3ee-0901-0010-658f-d9b21cdebce4">PCD inspector</a>.
    It describes how to do the mass property change.The change which u are refering is possible. An example is given for the same under the section 'Mass property change' under 'General PCD Inspector capabilities'.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Sharadha

  • Any BAPI available for mass creation/change/delete for dependency net

    Hi guys,
    Any BAPI available for mass creation/change/delete for constraints in dependency net. I mean any uploading option in mass for creation, change and delete.
    Regds
    Regds

    Hi,
    Check if the below FM's meet your need:
    CAMA_CNET_CONSTRAINT_MAINTAIN
    CAMA_CONSTRAINT_NET_MAINTAIN
    CAMA_DEPENDENCY_MAINTAIN
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • SQ00: Variant-change permission missing,but user wants to use and not to ch

    Hi There,
    i've created a InfoSet and a Query and my users want to use the Query. The Query has a default Variant and the Default-Variant also has a Default Layout. When the user wants to run my query, he gets an error:
    "Variantenpflege-Berechtigung FP zur Variantenpflege erforderlich (Meldungsnummer DB626)
    Sie möchen eine Variante bearbeiten oder löschen. Es fehlt ihnen die hierzu erforderliche berechtigung. Es handelt sich um das Berechntigungsobjekt S_PROGRAM und das Feld P_ACTION = VARIANT. Der Inhalt dieses Feldes Berechtigungsgruppe in den Report-Attributen wird gegen die Werte in Ihrem Benutzerstammstatz im Feld P_GROUP geprüft."
    Short Version in English:
    There is a permission for a Variant-change necessary ....
    I do not know why he gets this message, because he does not want to change the Variant, he only wants to use the Variant. Or should i give him the permission? But i don't that he is able to change the variant i've created...
    Any ideas ?! Any help will be appreciated.
    Regards
    Sebastian

    Hi Sebastian,
    maybe you solved it inbetween. If not,  you might entered something in the authorization-group of the the infoset:
    Infoset --> GoTo --> Global Properties --> Authorization Group
    If there is something entered the user get the DB626 message while chosing a variant in SQ01 (if he does not have authorization for S_PROGRAM / P_ACTION = VARIANT / P_GROUP --> Authorization Group)
    Cheers
    Jan

  • Do we have mass program change function

    in our case we need mass program change and is there anyone who can help me. in our case when studying one year as freshman students must change there program to higher level and i need mass program changes.
    regards,
    jin dal

    Hello Michael,
    it is not stage change. it is just program change and in the PIQST00, we have 'change of progrm' in the PIQST00 and i want to use this function in the background mode. if we have this function in the mass changes it would be happy
    regards,
    jin dal

  • Mass Variant for OBD creation+PGI

    Posting this after some initial research on this with our developers.
    We have a task at hand which we would like to do in mass but thereu2019s not really a consensus on whether it is possible
    Creation of OBD and doing PGI for some (large) open sales orders by confirming the pick qty= ordered qty where materials = a, b, c and storage location = 2. I,e the attributes to be changed in mass are not for all line items but for those line items with specific materials and specific storage location and set the pick qty to 1 and do the PGI and hence save the OBD (VL02N)
    Basically this is a slight deviation from standard wave job program as we are confirming the pick qty for selective lines that meet the unique combinations of Material and storage location and the pattern of that is random.
    If someone has done such a task before, through some mass maintenance tools (without the need for deploying a program in production), pls. reply. If additional info is required, pls. let me know.
    Also do share your ideas to accomplish this, even if you have not done it ditto before.
    Even if we can do this using combination of multiple variants of mass maintenance and standard FM's pls. let me know, anything that can cirumvent the manual process that we are doing now.
    Regards,

    Sounds rather unusual to me, so I doubt there is a standard program. I would have to search for it just like you could.
    You could try recording the steps for one such copy e.g. via SHDB and feed the variant names from an Excel sheet.
    Thomas

  • Fiscal Year Variant change

    Hello,
    We are being asked to switch our fiscal year variant from 445 to calendar month based beginning 1/1/2010.  I am curious as to how to approach this change from the BW perspective.
    I first did a quick look at the system to see how and where fiscal year variant is used. 
    What i found is that:
    1. Fiscal year variant is used in our cubes as part of the transaction data
    2. Almost all the queries have the FYV as part of the query definition.  (won't be able to restrict to just 1 FYV since it will rule out many records since FYV is part of transaction data in our cubes)
    3. Many queries compare current Fiscal periods to prior fiscal periods and and ranges too.  This is enabled by using variable exits for 0FISCPER etc.
    4. There are some Restricted Key Figures that have the FYV as part of thier definition.
    5. Many DSO objects have the FYV as a key field.
    What do you recommend from your own experience with regards to how to handle this change.  I am curious what the impacts will be and what I should be prepared for.  I am guessing that data in our DSO's will pile up since starting 1/1/2010 every record will have a new FYV (remember FYV is a key field), also I am curious how time based variable exits will work, since I think they depend to some extent on a single FYV.
    Any advice or recommendations on how to approach this change is appreciated.  Also what decisions have to be made if any...
    Thanks!
    Nick
    Edited by: Nick Bertz on Dec 3, 2009 3:17 PM

    Hello,
    Okay here is one thing that i have run across that i do not understand.  I am using Offsets in a query.  Everything works fine with regards to these offsets, except for when i introduce 2 Fiscal Year Variants. 
    Once there are 2 fiscal year variants, the offsets are completely ignored.
    Does anyone have an explanation why variable offsets would no longer work when there are 2 fiscal year variants on the same report?
    When i launch this query in the web browser from Analyzer I get the following error message:
    Diagnosis
    Variable ZS_FPER2 contains a fiscal year period which is to be moved by 10 periods. Before this can occur, the fiscal year variant must first be specified clearly so that the number of periods in the fiscal year can be determined.
    System Response
    Procedure
    If the fiscal year variant exists as a variable, enter a value for this variable. If the fiscal year variant is not specified in the query, you must include it in the query.
    You can specify the fiscal year variant either globally or for the InfoProvider specifically.
    Procedure for System Administration
      Notification Number BRAIN 618 
    Thanks,
    Nick
    Edited by: Nick Bertz on Dec 29, 2009 4:15 PM

  • Mass update changes are showing as saved but not updating.

    Hi Gurus,
    When I try to do some changes for scheduling agreement line item using t-code MEMASSSA the message is showing as that changes are saved, but when I log into schedule agreement these changes are not being update, even I donu2019t find any change in the log, can anyone let me know why this is happening. Thanks in Advance.

    Hello,
    Mass change for SA is clarified in note 1046851:
    "BAPI_SAG_CHANGE and BAPI_SAG_CREATE are restricted for time dependent
    condition. Whether a document uses time dependent condition or document
    condition is defined in customizing table T161 field STAKO. This set up
    is stored in the document at header level..."
    If this was allowed previously, then this was a program error and
    subsequent will create inconsistency in your system as the
    functionality was intended to block in mass transaction. If not
    there are possibilities of problem described in note 1034912.
    1034912 MEMASSSA - document conditions are deleted
    See aso, 1046794 FAQ: BAPI for outline agreement question 1
    1.  Question:
    You want to change a scheduling agreement via BAPI_SAG_CHANGE and
    receive the error message MEOUT019: "Scheduling agreements with
    time-independent conditions are not supported". Why?
    Answer:
    BAPI_SAG_CHANGE (and BAPI_SAG_CREATE) can only treat scheduling
    agreements with time-dependent conditions. Document conditions are not
    supported. Therefore, this kind of scheduling agreements cannot be
    processed. This is a missing functionality.
    Regards,

  • Mass Vendor Change

    Hi
    Is thr any t code for mass vendor master change?
    Vijay
    Edited by: Vijay on Nov 17, 2008 6:19 PM

    hi
    use code XK99
    regards
    kunal

  • Mass component change in BOM

    hi
    i want to  mass change some components in BOM. For example in the BOM i have 10 components. Now i want to change 5 components in the BOM
    I have around 500 FG How to do that? Is it possible in LSMW?. or CS20?

    It is better to go for getting a BDC developed for all the mass changes in the BOM.
    Using CS20 you can only change a single component and replace with a new material. I think BDC is the best alternative.
    Hope this helps you.

  • Mass PO Change By LSMW

    Hi Gurus,
    I want the LSMW procedure to mass change the PO. Suppose to change the multiple line items or Price of each line item.
    Plz suggest.
    Thanks & Regards
    Akshay

    Hi
    Please create a BDC for Changing of Purcahse Orders, even this is not possioble using  LSMW.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

Maybe you are looking for