Matching report tolerances

Hi Forum,
Can anyone advise on best practices in relation to the generation of a matching report and how best to hide balances less than a certain value ? I have a matching report written using evdre() but I have all the differences listed , ideally I would like to exclude any balance less than 100  EURO.
Thanks,
Brian

We separated the expense account from the liability accounts - we also created a rule to capture the prior year YTD plug account balance in the current month.  This solved our issue.

Similar Messages

  • Does SAP system provide 3 way matching report from PO up to payment in AP

    Dear expert,
    Would like to seek for your help to advise, does SAP system provide 3 way matching report from PO up to payment in AP  with the following information?
    Vendor Number
    Vendor Name
    AP Document Number
    AP Document Date
    Payment Document Number
    Payment Document Date
    Payment Amount
    PO reference Number and Date
    Item Description
    Please help.
    Regards,
    KH

    Hi Atif,
    Thank you for the prompt reply, however I have a few question to seek for your advise as below:
    a)I would like to know does  SAP system have any standard report which have the information of 3 way matching report from PO up to payment in AP module?
    b) I have find one report using T-code:FBl1N (vendor line item) is able to display the report with information of invoice,payment and there is one field purchasing document in the report however this field do not have any po number refer to the invoice.
    I would like to know what the field purchasing document mean for (i.e what are the information capture on the column purchasing document)?
    Please help.
    Regards,
    KH

  • Intercompany Matching Report Balance is not the same as Plug account

    Hi - we are running an ICP Matching report (standard setup without any custom consolidation logic).  The balance in the report does not tie to the balance for the Plug account that we ran the report for - Intercompany report uses plug account as the parameter to generate the report.
    For this grouping of accounts, we have both P/L and Balance sheet accounts plugging to the same Interco plug account.  While we understand this is not standard practice, mixing the different account types in the same Plug account, could this be causing our issue?
    Does the IC Plug accounts generate Periodic values for Income Statement accounts?
    Any guidance is much appreciated.

    We separated the expense account from the liability accounts - we also created a rule to capture the prior year YTD plug account balance in the current month.  This solved our issue.

  • Invoice matching report in AR Donwpayment Invoice

    Hi Expert,
    Customer would like to see AR Downpayment Invoice matching report as follow. May I know how to derive the information?
    BP name(A)   D/P Inv No(B).  Total amount in D/P Inv(C)    Amount applied in invoices(D)    Remaining balance(E)=C-D
    and the report must include supporting information about paid invoices
    Inv No.    Posting date      Amount.--> Total of these amount must be same with (D)
    Regards
    Thomas

    Dear Thomas,
    In order to get this information you need a query that would work out the values in the ar down payment invoice.
    This can be a beginning. However, some values must be calculated in the query because they are not in the table.
    SELECT T0.DocNum, T0.CardCode, T1.VatSum, T1.LineTotal, (T1.LineTotal * T0.DpmPrcnt/100) as DPM, (t1.LineTotal - (T1.LineTotal * T0.DpmPrcnt/100) - T1.VatSum) as PAYM_LEFT FROM ODPI T0  INNER JOIN DPI1 T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry WHERE T0.DocNum = '1'
    Please, let me know if this is sufficient or you need some more information from the query.
    Kind Regards,
    Marcella Rivi
    SAP Business One Forums Team

  • Intercompany Matching Report does not run

    Hi All!
    I'm trying to run IC Matching report on HFM 11.1.1.2 on sample COMMA Application.
    But have an error like this:
    Unspecified error
    Show Details:
    Error Reference Number: {0A4406C3-2AAD-4830-93B3-72DC20A8EA3D};User Name: testuser@testdomain
    Num: 0x80004005;Type: 1;DTime: 24.07.2009 13:04:20;Svr: HQ-ALIMIN;File: ReportGenerator_Intercompany.cpp;Line: 1006;Ver: 11.1.1.2.0.2207;
    Num: 0x80004005;Type: 1;DTime: 24.07.2009 13:04:20;Svr: HQ-ALIMIN;File: ReportGenerator_Intercompany.cpp;Line: 1010;Ver: 11.1.1.2.0.2207;
    Num: 0x80004005;Type: 0;DTime: 24.07.2009 13:04:20;Svr: HQ-ALIMIN;File: CHsvReportGeneratorACM.cpp;Line: 691;Ver: 11.1.1.2.0.2207;
    Num: 0x80004005;Type: 0;DTime: 24.07.2009 13:04:20;Svr: HQ-ALIMIN;File: HFMActionsExecution.cpp;Line: 2195;Ver: 11.1.1.2.0.2207;
    Num: 0x80004005;Type: 0;DTime: 24.07.2009 13:04:20;Svr: HQ-ALIMIN;File: HFMActions.cpp;Line: 72;Ver: 11.1.1.2.0.2207;
    Num: 0x80004005;Type: 0;DTime: 24.07.2009 13:04:20;Svr: HQ-ALIMIN;File: HFMCESAction.cpp;Line: 28;Ver: 11.1.1.2.0.2207;
    Num: 0x80004005;Type: 0;DTime: 24.07.2009 13:04:20;Svr: HQ-ALIMIN;File: Actions.cpp;Line: 291;Ver: 11.1.1.2.0.2207;
    Other reports (for example Journal reports) works fine.
    What's wrong in my system? How can I fix this?
    Thanks in advance!

    Please ensure you have MSXML 6.0 SP2.
    Stop all your hyperion services and IIS admin services.
    De-register following .dll files
    Using command regsvr32 -u <dll name with complete path>
    1. <HYPERION_HOME>\Products\Financial Management\Server\HsvData.dll
    2. <HYPERION_HOME>\Products\Financial Management\Server\HsvMetaData.dll
    3. <HYPERION_HOME>\Products\Financial Management\Server\HsvSystemInfo.dll
    Re-Register the above dll using regsvr32 <dll name with complete path>
    Start IIS Admin services
    Start Database services
    Start the relevant Hyperion services and test your results. The above should fix your problem.
    This solution I received from janarthanan sivaraj (Oracle) . It works for me.
    Let know if this helps.

  • Intercompany Matching report from Financial Report Studio

    Hello all,
    Im trying to create an Intercompany matching report with Financial Reporting (Hyperion Reports), I've used two grids with identical selections but swapped entity and icp dimensions.
    With a function I can retrieve this data into one grid and calculate the mismatch, but my question is do I need first to create a System-defined member list for my ICP members?
    As a result of my current report (without the system defined member list) i'm getting half report correct and half incorrect..
    Does anybody else face this problem before? Any comments and help will be highly appreciated.
    Best Regards,
    Jorge

    I've created 2 Member List, both identical either for ICP and Entities, using scripts... and it works well....
    I've Build up the report in this way:
    Grid1 Acct Pay Acct Rec Matching Difference
    ICP / Entity XXX Grid2. Column[A] [A]-
    Grid 2 (Hide) Acct Rec
    Entity / ICP XXX
    Note that the Grid1 is getting the information from Grid2 and doing the matching difference. As a result I'm getting a bit list with about 210K lines, that brings to me all possible combinations with all entities. Basically the final report should have about 1K lines for every month, it means that there is a lot of Zero's on the rows. The solution I've found is use the suppress option, but as a result I've got a new problem!!
    The Fist(Acct Pay) and the 3rd (Matching Difference) Column Looks fine, but the 2nd column that is "linked' with the grid 2 becomes 0.
    And I'm struggling myself to get it done !! eheh If someone know how to get it fix please let me know!!
    Best Regards,
    Jorge

  • HFM Intercompany match reports won't display

    Are there any specific system requirements for HFM intercompany match reports to display? Almost all of the users of our current HFM application are able to successfully run match reports, however one user in particular is unable to render the reports. In order to remove the question of user access, I want to confirm that this user is in the same security groups as others who are able to successfully run the reports.
    My assumption is that there are settings on the individual user's machine that are preventing her from displaying the report. Has anyone else experienced this issue?  Could she be missing a plug in or some system configuration that is required?
    Thanks in advance for your responses.
    Scott
    EDIT:
    User had Google Toolbar installed.  Even though IE pop-up blocker was turned off, Google was stopping it from rendering.

    Hi
    1. Open Internet Explorer. In the "Tools" drop-down menu, select Internet Options
    2. You will now be presented with the "Internet Options" screen. Under the "Security tab," click Custom Level
    3. You will now be presented with the "Security Settings" panel, scroll down to the "Downloads" section. Under the "Automatic prompting for file downloads" subheading, click Enable. Choose Enable under the "File download" subheading as well. Then click OK to confirm the security settings have been changed on your browser
    Also make sure that you are following the below Oracle Knowledge baes article.
      Internet Explorer (IE7, IE8 and IE9) Recommended Settings for Oracle Hyperion Products [ID 820892.1]
    thank you
    Regards,
    Mahe

  • Customizing IC Matching Reports

    Is there a way to customize the IC Matching Reports. We need reports that tie to the Elimination plug account but our elimination rules are not standard (contain additional condition to meet to trigger the elim, for example both entity and ICP (when viewed as Entity) have to be in consistent custom member).
    We are able to reconcile the IC matching reports to the plug but wondered if there are options to customize.

    Andrew S,
    Intercompany Matching (matching BALANCES) Report
    In this module it is very easy to show only specific custom members. When you are creating your report you have to specify Account and Partner (matching) account properties.
    You are recommended here to put the full POV you want to search for e.g. A#accname.C1#topC1member.C2#topC2member.C3#topc3member.C4#topc4member
    Obviously if you only want to pull matches with a specific C1 member, then you make "topc1member" to be a particular base member of the C1 dimension. Likewise for any of the other Custom dimensions (C2-C4).
    Please read the documentation pages 202-203 in this file http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10530_01/doc/epm.931/hfm_admin.pdf
    Although it doesn't go into much detail, it does show that the syntax for Account and Partner can include Custom1-4 dimension top members as well. When creating an IC Matching report - the more specific you can be in 'dialing in' the range of intercompany matches the better performance you will experience.
    Hope this helped.
    G'Luck,
    David

  • COGS Revenue Matching Report

    Hi All,
    We are started using standard concurrent program "COGS Revenue Matching Report" XML publisher report.
    Report is completing with no errors, but we are not able view the output in PDF. We checked the template and standard template is selected properly.
    We are using the R12 (12.0.6) instance. The size of the XML file generated for this report is 200MB.
    Is anyone faced the similar issue, please advice.
    Thanku in advance
    Rama

    Hi,
    Please go through note:
    Why Does OPP Intermittently Completes With Warnings and Error 'java.lang.OutOfMemoryError'? (Doc ID 978495.1)
    Please check your file version of CSTRCMVB.pls  and update your pls file if applicable (try on TEST instance)
    Cogs Revenue Matching Report Performance Issue (Doc ID 1352075.1)
    Thanks  &
    Best Regards,

  • PO matching pricing tolerance

    Hi!
    Can anyone tell me the API or Function used to match a Purchase Order to an Invoice in Oracle Payables.
    I need to use it to match only the amounts, taking into consideration pricing tolerance. My application uses a 3-Way tolerance.
    In fact, i need to compare the price of PO in Euro currency to Invoice Amount in Euro. These 2 amounts are stored in Descriptive flex fields on PO and AP.
    vik
    Message was edited by:
    Vik Awotar

    Hi,
    I'm not sure about the API, but you can do that yourself from a custom piece of code. 2-way matching essentially matches the PO Price to the Invoice Price and PO item qty to the Invoice item qty. This can be achieved by relating tables PO_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL and AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL. (This is a many to one relationship - the joining key being PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID). If you're upto 3-way matching, then over and above these two tables, you can relate RCV_TRANSACTIONS and AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL (This is also a many to one relationship - the joining key being RCV_TRANSACTION_ID) to match the Invoice item qty to item qty received against the PO in Inventory.
    Regards,
    Rakesh.

  • Changing value of select list to match report field

    I have an Apex page that has a report region and a form region.
    The report region returns a single row of data from a SQL select. One of the fields returned is a user id (which I translate into a user name using a LOV).
    In the form region, I have a select list containing users (based on the same LOV as above). The form is used to add a new record to a table. I want the select list in the form region to display the same user as displayed in the reports region. I'm adding in the form is based on the user id in the report region.
    How do I do this? Because the form region is adding a new record, and uses the Database field as Source, it always displays the first item in the LOV.
    I tried using computations to override what's in the select list in the form region (by doing a SQL select and getting the same row of data as in the reports region) but this doesn't seem to work. The select list just always defaults to the first user.
    Is there a trick for making one select list match another?

    Cheers - think you're right, using the default will do it. Having a bit of trouble with my SQL select now though...
    This is the SQL I'm was using
    SELECT ASSIGNED_USER_ID FROM REQUEST WHERE REQUEST_ID = 1;
    How do I rewrite this as a PL/SQL function or expression to return the ASSIGNED_USER_ID field as my default (I'm still learning the basics of PL/SQL)?

  • PowerPivot in SharePoint 2013 : how match report with user connected

    Hi all,
    I would share an excel in my SharePoint 2013 (Entreprise) . This excel file contains a worksheet which contains data retrieved from a cube. So is it possible to filter this report directly in SharePoint ? How can I match my username indicator with the user
    connected (ID) ?
    Thanks in advance for your help
    Mutandis mutatis

    The way to set this up is to either use and configure Kerberos or EffectiveUserName within Excel Calculation Services. Both methods will pass the user executing the report to the SSAS instance.
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Invoice/payment matching report

    Hi I am very new to AP,I would like to know if there is an exsiting report which will show the vendor invoice as well as our payment...thanks!

    Hi,
    In FBL1N you receive this information. Choose cleared itens and then add clear document to your list.
    I hope this solve your problem. If not give some more information
                  Best Regards
                         João Fernandes

  • AP Reported channel utilization in Prime does not match reported channel utilization in Spectrum Expert

    Hello
    I have a fairly dense Wireless network with an Accesspoint per room. The 3502 models are connected to WiSM with Software 7.0.240.0 and are managed with Prime Infrastructure 2.2 (the issue was also in older PI versions).
    PI reports on the 802.11b/g/n interface a channel utilization of 32% with a RX and TX utilization of 0% (no clients are connected to this AP). If I open this AP now in Spectrum Expert (thanks to CleanAir), I have a channel utilization of less than 5%, no interference power at all. Also the Swept Spectrometer is only showing signal with less than -85dbi (with a few very rare higher powered specks).
    So which value is now correct, or do they show something different?
    Thanks,
    Patrick

    This is very important to understand. I should actually do a blog post on the subjey, it comes up often. 
    Think like a wifi radio. You can only do 3 things: send, receive, listen. And you can only do one of these at a time. While in listen mode, you hear other traffic on your channel within range. In send mode you tx data on the channel. In receive mode you Rx data on the channel. Based on these functions. You as an AP can determine how often the medium (channel) is busy or not. 
    Lets go a bit deeper. Before a frame is sent a preamble is triggered to sync all clients on the channel. These client do not know yet if the frame is for them or not. Then the phy header comes telling clients how lomg/time the frame will take to send. Then the actual frame gets punched and all the clients receive it. The client brimg it up from the PMD layer to the data layer. Look at the Mac address and if its for them they process the frame. If it's not for them they drop it. But before they drop it they peek at the Nav timer in the duration / ID field and back off again. This time for the SIFS and ACK. This busy time calculates the number you are seeing .. Better ? 
    I normally dont don't worry about channel utilization till 40% under load. If you are at 40 without load I bet you habe 1 PHY mandatory .. Do you ? 

  • GL Balance Report output not Matching with Material Stock

    Hi,
    Can we Match Reports MB5B (Stock on Posting Date)  and S_ALR_87012301 (G/L Account Balance)???
    Till March these reports are matching but from April 11, data not matching..
    In tcode MB5B, we are looking Valuated Stock of Materials and in tcode s_alr_87012301 showing balances, which were matching earlier..
    Plz guide...

    Dear:
              Execute the stock GL in FS04 to track the history of changes made to it. It is quite possible that post automatically tick was changed and some direct posting were made against this GL which ultimately caused discrepancies. If track is showing post automatic tick changed then it means some direct posting were made to it, Note the period in which it was changed and analyze the posting against this GL in that time span.
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for