Material Blocked by another user

Hi,
Can you confirm, At a time multiple user can create Sale/ PO Order with Same material & plant.
kindly confirm.
Regards,
Venkat

Hi
Yes at a time Multiple SO or PO can be created for a material by multiple users.
But posting GR/ GI for a particular material is not possible as it will be locked by another user.

Similar Messages

Creating a materialized view for another user

I don't seem to find the correct setup for this....
With the user "dummy"
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW dummy.thetable BUILD IMMEDIATE REFRESH FORCE ON DEMAND AS select * from real.thetable;
And the materialized view is created ok.
With a DBA user:
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW dummy.thetable BUILD IMMEDIATE REFRESH FORCE ON DEMAND AS select * from real.thetable;
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
I don't want to be switching back and forth from the user to create materialized views, am I missing a permission here? DBA of course has create any materialized view

From the SQL Reference Guide:
To create a materialized view in another user’s schema:
- You must have the CREATE ANY MATERIALIZED VIEW system privilege.
- The owner of the materialized view must have the CREATE TABLE system privilege. The owner must also have access to any master tables of the materialized view that the schema owner does not own (for example, if the master tables are on a remote database), and to any materialized view logs defined on those master tables, either through a SELECT object privilege on each of the tables or through the SELECT ANY TABLE system privilege.
I suspect that, if you first GRANT CREATE TABLE TO DUMMY, you will be able to create the MV.

IDOC POsting Error: Transition no. OBJ_SYS is blocked by another user

Hi Experts,
I m sending the XML from a third party system into SAP using XI as middleware for IDOC posting (FB01).
I m getting an error <b>Transition no. <xx> is blocked by another user</b> while sending intercompany and cash applications. SAP is unable to process such XML directly.
But if i login to SAP and mannually post the IDOC, it is getting posted successfully.
Any idea what may be the cause?
Useful answers will be rewarded for sure.
Regards
DhanyaR Nair

Hi Dhanya,
        In your inbound idoc processing program, pls do use the lock mechanism for the FI document which you are processing and if it cannot be locked then keep it on wait for sometime and check for the same.
        If its a standard program check whether it can be done in XI.
      When SAP is locking the transaction it will be unlocked after the commit work and hence its happening.
The reason why you may not be getting this in individual processing is that you are doing the same thru a single session. And the lock if am not wrong is happening in table level and not in record level.
Cheers
JK

Will I know I've been blocked by another user?

If I have been blocked by another user, will I receive some kind of notification? When I send text messages to the other user, will they simply not be delivered, or will they bounce back to me as undeliverable?

A buyer can be blocked from buying an item but not from 'seeing' an item. Usually if you can't see the items it means that the seller does not have shipping for that particular item to Canada. If you want to see if that is the case, change your shipping location to the U.S. on the top right of the search page so that you can tell if there are listings available just to the U.S.

Seeing held material document with another user I.D.

Hi Experts,
I am new to this forum. My query is - Is it possible to see a material document in the held list of MIGO screen if the document has been held up with some other user I.D. I held up a goods issue document from MIGO screen and i can see that document in held list of MIGO screen with same user I.D. But when i am entering MIGO with another user I.D. this document is not showing up in the held list. How can i see it in held data list of the MIGO screen with the second user I.D. ?
Regards
Sm.

>
Sm wrote:
> Hi Jeyakanthan,
> If it is not possible to see it with the other i.d., will it be possible to post it in the held format if the material document number is there? i tried to do the posting of the material document created and held with another user i.d., system is allowing to post but the document does not appear in the held format, i had to re-fill all the fields before posting it. Is it standard SAP behaviour ? Can i somehow get the filled-in and held up MIGO document with my i.d. and then post it?
>
> Regards
> Sm.
Certain information can't be holded like excise details
For more details Click 'i" help in migo screen How to work with this transaction --->Hold and Manage Data
or
Search for SAP notes in component MM-IM-GR-MIGO

Regardig material locking by another user

Dear Friend,
when i have done production entry by mfbf at that time there is another user for same material then there is error shown that material locked by that user
is there is any customising to eliminate this type of situation
at time of entry also to reduce time entry time
i know SM12 but my user have not authorisation of that t/code
thanks in advance
regards,
nil

Dear,
Checck the settings in transaction OMT0.
This controls the lock used on materials. It can sometimes be set to be TOO safe and therefore lock everyone when it is not necessary.
There are different ways to do this.
1. First request user to logoff and try login again.
2. Check SM04 list and run session for that user.
3. Try to delete lock , SM12 transaction.
OR,
Go to SM50, Select the process.
Go to menu Program/Session>Program>Cancel.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

1st salesorder blocked if another user is in 2nd salesorder of a contract

Hi,
I have a service contract and a number of sales orders linked to it.
If one sales order is being edited by an user, other user cannot access any another independent order linked to this contract.
The first user has to come out of the 1st sales order, so that others can edit other sales ordes.
Is this a new funtionality in ECC 6.0. The user says he has encountered this issue before in 4.6c.
I checked in my test client and it works this way only...
I have not worked with service contracts in 4.6c ...
Just want to make sure if this is a new functionality in ECC 6.0...
Any idea?
Thanks
Anand Viswanathan

V.,
This is driven by the copy control from contract-to-sales order at the item category level, the field "Pos./neg. quan" if Positive or negative then it is waiting until you edit the newlly created sales document before it unlocks the referenceable contract ... Thiink about it ... somebody could be changing sales order #1 using all the referenceable quantity (and maybe the really good volume price) of that contract and Sales Order #2 should not have any more quantity available other than the quantity already used...
If you set the "Pos./neg. quan" = "0" (or blank) then no locking will happen, but your contract quantity fulfillment will NOT get reduced every time you reference it (For example, you may want to have an inquiry that could be reference to a quote as many times as needed, without reducing the referenceable quantity.
Hope this helps,
Ed.

Issue creating a MatView for another user w/ a private DB Link

I am having an issue creating a materialized view for another user where the select statement for the MV uses a private db link. Looks like the following:
Logged in as user X, I run:
create materialzied view Y.foo
(select blah
from tbl@y_priv_db_link_here);
When I try to run this, I get a permission issue. User X has DBA privilege, user Y has create MV priv and has select priv on the table in the db link.
I can create this MV logged in as user Y. Cant create this logged in a user Y in test or prod environment, so this isn't an option.
Any ideas on how I can create this logged in a user X? I believe the issue here is that since this is a private db link owned by user Y, user X doesn't have access to this db link.
thanks.

Here is what I was trying to do:
SQL> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW extract.ADDRESS
2 TABLESPACE xxx
3 BUILD IMMEDIATE
4 REFRESH
5 COMPLETE
6 ON DEMAND
7 WITH PRIMARY KEY
8 AS
9 ( SELECT ... FROM address@CM_TO_CPD);
FROM pwb_address@CM_TO_CPD)
ERROR at line 11:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
Message was edited by:
Jim S

Material block In Availability Control

Dear Experts,
In IMG-Availability Check-Define Checking Group-----one check box is there "Material block in availability check with transfer of qties" .What will be impact if we checked this box and how it is different to the Block check Box in " Define Material Block for other users" in availability Check.
Regards
Jyoti.

"Material block in availability check with transfer of qties" .
Might be you have faced the case like if you are working on Transaction MSC2N with some material & at the same time ,you create a Delivery for the same material , you will get an error that Material is Blocked.Secondly when you do the availability check in the Sales order and at the same time ,you have opened MM02,then you will get the same error.
" Define Material Block for other users"
This has been maintained to check the exact situation of the stock .Like if you have created a Delivery (without PGI) of XYZ Material of 10 MTS and again you will try to create an order for the same Material & Batch , it will not show you the confirmed Quantity.
Hope it may help you.
Best Regards,
Ankur

How to avoid: Material data locked by another user

Hi,
'Material data locked by another user'
We want to avoid this kind of situation so that two different users can do the transactions on same material at same time.
Regards,

hi,
As per SAP std. configuration its not possible...And if we the reason...then it good for a user...
so, that once the user 1's work is not done fully user 2 can't work untill then and by this we avoid making of extra GR/IR or any of the duplicate documents...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Hi there. My iPod Nano was stolen from my car today. I do know the serial number of this stolen device. Is there any way that Apple can block another user from connecting this stolen device to iTunes?

Hi there. My iPod Nano was stolen from my car today. I do know the serial number of this stolen device. Is there any way that Apple can block another user from connecting this stolen device to iTunes? Also, if another user was to attempt to connect this stolen device to iTunes, would Apple be able to inform of the username of this person in order that I could then pass this information to the police?

Is there any way that Apple can block another user from connecting this stolen device to iTunes?
No.
Also, if another user was to attempt to connect this stolen device to iTunes, would Apple be able to inform of the username of this person in order that I could then pass this information to the police?
No. Apple can do nothing to help. Sorry.
Reporting a lost or stolen Apple product
B-rock

Material block with quantity transfer

Dear all,
        I have searched some information from library, and it is useful for our company, can anyone help to tell me how to make the configure to achieve it ? Thanks in advance!!
       The information is below:
       "If another user tries to process the blocked material in the corresponding plant while the availability check is being carried out, the system tries five times to block the material exclusively for this other transaction with a pause of about 1 second between each attempt. If the fifth attempt is unsuccessful, the check is terminated and the transaction remains unconfirmed. To confirm the transaction, the user must call up the availability check again."

Can anyone help me ??

Free Goods from One Material Group to Another Material Group

Salute Masters!!
I need your valuble suggestion, please provide.
I need to configure Free Goods of Material Group to Material Group.
User want:
1) Free Goods from one Material Group to another Material Group, like F010 to F040
2) User should have option to change from one Material Group to Other Material Group, which He / She want, like F010 or F020, F030, F040 any one of them.
Suppose;
Line Item Material Belongs to One Group Quantity in Gallons Free Goods from Any Material Group Quantity in Gallons
      1            A                                              3                                    F010                                             4
      2            B                                              3                                     F020
      3            C                                              4                                     F040
Any No. of Line Item Any No. of Material
                                   from One Group      Total 10                   From Any Material Group
(Comprising of 3-4 Different Material from 1 Group, they should be able to choose/provide Free Goods from other Material Group)
3) While creating Sales Order what Quantity (Gallons/No./Ltr) to be put?
How I can configure this scenario?
Please suggest, is it possible through KEY COMBINATION?
Rgds.
Srivastav
+91 7829755109
Skype ID: sanjai.srivastav1

Hi,
if you want to give free goods from other group it can be possible only for EXCLUSIVE free good type
In exclusive free goods, a material different from the orignal material can be specified as the free goods.
Example: A customer who buys 200 crates of beer, gets 5 boxes of glasses free.
In VBN1 >> Exclusive
See column ADD FREE MATERIAL
While creating Sales Order what Quantity (Gallons/No./Ltr) to be put?
Maintain alternative units in material master >> Additional data >> Material master,BUT it is only main item
Those item u want to give free that items unit is derived from free goods condition record and it CANNOT be change in order

Limitation on a material basis or another filed in recipe.

Hi All,
I wasnt to grant access to recipes to users depending on the data that is given in the recipe (e.g. per application field or material,u2026).E.g. some users are allowed to see/change recipe of material XYZ, while other users are not allowed to see/change a recipe of material XYZ.
So , can you please find out, if there is any possibility to create a check or whatsoever to include such an access limitation on a material basis (or another field in the recipe) on recipes?
Regards
satish

It is not common that authorizations must be based on material codes of the recipe header;
it is usual , however, to create some roles based on Authotization objet VAGRP from C_ROUT_MAT.-
Many VAGRP ( or Planner Group in the Recipe Header) can be created in Customizing and assigned to the recipe header.
Regards

Dead Lock what made by another user!(patition table)

I have a question about Dead-Lock!
Our Situation is ..
User "A" made a Patition Table, ACNT_WONJANG
(without any Trigger,Function, Procedure)
When "B" - another user - tried to drop its Partition,
Dead-Lock invoked.
but A droped it's Partition well.
What can i Do?
this is the trace file.
/oracle/home/admin/ACNT/udump/ora_44478_acnt.trc
Oracle8i Enterprise Edition Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production
With the Partitioning option
JServer Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production
ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/home
System name: AIX
Node name: acnt
Release: 3
Version: 4
Machine: 000C962D4C00
Instance name: ACNT
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 15
Unix process pid: 44478, image: oracle@acnt (TNS V1-V3)
*** SESSION ID:(16.394) 2001-10-04 15:00:41.829
A self-deadlock among DDL and parse locks
is detected. In most cases, this self-deadlock
is handled internally.
This should be reported to Oracle Support
ONLY IF an error is signalled back to the
user on a command-line or screen.
The following information may aid in finding
user on a command-line or screen.
The following information may aid in finding
the problem.
ORA-04020: deadlock detected while trying to lock object
F03P.ACNT_WONJANG
session: 440786b4 request: X
LIBRARY OBJECT HANDLE: handle=43108348
name=F03P.ACNT_WONJANG
hash=76b93583 timestamp=NULL
namespace=TABL/PRCD/TYPE flags=KGHP/TIM/SML/[02000000]
kkkk-dddd-llll=0000-0001-0001 lock=S pin=S latch=0
lwt=43108360[43108360,43108360] ltm=43108368[43108368,43108368]
pwt=43108378[43108378,43108378] ptm=431083d0[431083d0,431083d0]
ref=43108350[43108350,43108350] lnd=431083dc[4310824c,425b7ec4]
LIBRARY OBJECT: object=431080d0
flags=NEX[0002] pflags= [00] status=VALD load=0
DATA BLOCKS:
data# heap pointer status pins change
0 431082d8 43108154 I/P/A 0 NONE
HEAP DUMP OF DATA BLOCK 0:
HEAP DUMP heap name="library cache" desc=0x431082d8
HEAP DUMP heap name="library cache" desc=0x431082d8
extent sz=0x224 alt=32767 het=8 rec=9 flg=2 opc=0
parent=30000030 owner=431080d0 nex=0 xsz=0x0
EXTENT 0
Chunk 431080c0 sz= 196 perm "perm "
alo=196
431080C0 500000C5 00000000 00000000 000000C4 [P...............]
431080D0 43108348 431080D4 431080D4 431080DC [C..HC...C...C...]
431080E0 431080DC 00000000 00000000 00020100 [C...............]
431080F0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [................]
43108100 43108144 00000000 00000000 00000000 [C..D............]
43108110 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [................]
Repeat 2 times
43108140 00000000 431082D8 00000000 43108154 [....C.......C..T]
43108150 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [................]
Repeat 1 times
43108170 00000000 00000000 00000019 00000000 [................]
43108180 00000000 [....]
Total heap size = 196
FREE LISTS:
Bucket 0 size=0
Total free space = 0
UNPINNED RECREATABLE CHUNKS (lru first):
Total free space = 0
UNPINNED RECREATABLE CHUNKS (lru first):
PERMANENT CHUNKS:
Chunk 431080c0 sz= 196 perm "perm "
alo=196
Permanent space = 196

carlyfromal wrote:
Here's the thing I myself have an Ipad 3 that I got from Ebay that is activation locked and I have the same issue. Can't get the info. Well,since Apple conveniently decided to discontinue selling the Ipad 3 the only way I could get one was to buy a used one,so it looks to me like they could have some mercy and help a person unlock the thing. We're not dishonest people that go around stealing things,yet because of Apple's brilliant(I use that term sarcastically) idea to put this stupid new crap in place people like us who have to buy second-hand products have to suffer and get screwed out of money we had to save up to buy this stuff! And all anyone can come up with is "well boohoo" or "tough luck" or whatever! But,what about the rights of the rest of us?! Some of you may find this a tad rude, but oh well,tough luck!
On the other hand, there are those of us that appreciate the theft protection provided by the latest IOS.
There are certain things to watch out for when purchasing used devices of any sort, the first of which is to ensure that you're not buying stolen property. Since you are unable to obtain cooperation from the seller, perhaps your device was stolen!

Material Blocked by another user

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for