Material BO Doubt

Hi
I need to create a workflow, whenever user modify/change or newly assign Inspection type in MM02. I have checked in mm02, which bo is trigger. But i can see in swel A00MARA trigger while change the inspection type or any thing in MM02.
But i checked in SWo1, A00MARA is not available.
My requirement like whenever user assign or modify inspection type only in MM02, i want to send mail. Before that i have to identify which BO is trigger.
Can any one help me for that?

Hi,
i have the same problem. Did you find the answer ?
thanks.

Similar Messages

Material master doubt

Hi all,
I am very much confused in what to fill in few fields of material master.
Please let me know in case of ROH, HALB and FERT material masters, what to fill in :
1._In house production days_?(My doubt here is in house production days will be suppose 2 days for 2 quantities and 1 day for 1 quantity.So do i need to give 1 day or 2 days for in house production days?
Next doubt: If my in house production days are 2 hours for 1 quantity( for example I am in HALB or FERT material master), how will i put 2 hours? that field only takes in terms of days! I cant put decimals.Do i need to go to in work scheduling view and at bottom I need to give base quantity as 48 if I have given 2hours in inhouse production days??
2.setup, teardown, processing, and interoperation times, base quantity in work scheduling view
My doubt here is for HALB and FERT anyhow I am giving time in routings, why to give it here also? more over base quantity is given with what reference? is it like setup, teardown, processing, and interoperation times are given total for base quantity 20 quantity( for example)?
3.Replenishment lead time: what data to give here? what will happen if I do not give anything? what will happen if I have given GR processing and planned delivery time also and the addition of these two is not equal to replenishment lead time?(is it related to replenishment lead time in any way??
Please reply in all 3 cases: ROH, HALB, FERT
I am into implementation and my client is asking me daily and I am very much confused.
Regards,
Mohammad Arif.

Hi,
Setup, inter opn, teardown
Yes the base qty specified here should be the common base qty for all the above
The Lead time data maintained in Material master is considered if you choose "Basic scheduling" in scheduling field during MRP run (check MD02)
If you choose " Lead time scheduling" in that field then the data in routing is considered
In house prodn time:
In-house production time is independent of the order quantity.
The system requires the in-house production time to determine the planned dates for planned orders in materials planning (If you choose basic scheduling).
If you want it to be on basis of lot size... then specify you enter the setup, teardown, processing, and interoperation times. If you maintain these values, the system determines the in-house production time on the basis of lot size.
Total Replenishment lead time
Total replenishment lead time (in workdays)
The total replenishment lead time is the time needed before the product is completely available again, that is, after all BOM levels have been procured or produced. It is not calculated by the system, but defined in this field as the total of the in-house production time(s) and/or the planned delivery time(s) of the longest production path.
This time is necessary if, for materials produced in-house, the replenishment lead time is to be taken into consideration in the availability check.
In an availability check where the system takes the replenishment lead time into consideration, it only checks whether there are sufficient incoming quantities and stocks available to cover the requirements within the replenishment lead time. Outside the replenishment lead time,the system assumes that the material is available in sufficient quantity.
Therefore, in this situation, it is usually necessary to depict the product's total replenishment lead time with all BOM levels as the replenishment lead time.
Use
The following options exist for materials produced in-house if the replenishment lead time is included in the availability check:
The Total replenishment lead time field is maintained.
In this case, the time maintained in this field is used for the availability check.
The Total replenishment lead time field is not maintained.
In this case, the system reads the in-house production time and, if available, the goods receipt processing time, and interprets the total of these two times as the replenishment lead time for the availability check.
Note
There is no point in maintaining the Total replenishment lead time field for materials procured externally. In external procurement, the system adds the processing time from purchasing, the planned delivery time, and the goods receipt processing time and uses this total as the replenishment lead time for an availability check with replenishment lead time.
Regards,
Ashok

Material Ledger doubt

Hi All
Can anybody please explain regarding the transaction key LKW ( in TCODE : OBYC configuration)
As this LKW key is for Material Ledger documents postings for Accrual and defferals account. As per my knowledge system post the FI document to relevant GL assigned , when we do the ML Costing Run (using TCODE : CKMLCP).At the time of run in the step posting if we don't select the revaluate material check box, system is asking for assignment of GL to LKW key.But the thing is i don't know which entries it'll posted in this case and why it is required to post
But, could anybody please explain the purpose the key LKW.
It'll be great helpful for me
regards
VVR

Dear Kalappa,
If I want to revalue the stocks, Material Ledger ask me to configurate OBYC operations PRD, PRV and PRY , what kind of accounts I must define here?.
I think if I not going to revalue stocks the consumption is going to be in the actual month you said I must use revenue accounts, it is correct? can you explain more about it? In that case ML is going to make accounting complementary? because all the movements in the beginning was costed by standard cost but now I calculate the Periodic Internal Price, ML is going to make accounting between the difference Periodic Internal price and Standard price for example for movements like consumption, cost of good sales...?
I would appreciate your help as soons as possible.
Antonio Rivas Plata

Materialized views Doubt

Hi All,
I have a question regarding materialized view.
I am adding new columns to the base table of a materialized view.As part of this I do recompiling dependent objects.Do I need to take any action on materialized views? I mean Validating or recreating?
Thanks
Hena

Assuming that you're not expecting the new column to appear in the materialized view, you shouldn't need to do anything.
Justin

Windows vs Mac Performance - Mac wins at the moment

I can tell you from firsthand experience that Lightroom is very useable on a Mac but significantly less so on WinXP.
I have a 1yr old XP laptop, 2GHz Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 128MB ATI X1400, 7200RPM hard drive with 60% free space where my library and photos reside (separate partition). My 8,000+ 1DMII .cr2 (mainly RAW) photos had to be imported without the create standard previews selected and rendered later. I also turn off write XMP when using LR as it slows down my system too much. My photos have between 5-10 keywords each from previous input using iView. The develop module works fine, but it is the library that is painful -- takes too long to try and rearrange my keywords into a hierarchy. In fact, any type of keywording or metadata changes makes my system hang for a few seconds. Forget about using Firewire 400 external hard drive, it degrades my LR performance even further. I can't imagine how people with older hardware configurations cope but I guess it's all relative to what you're used to.
I come from C1Pro, Rawshooter Premium and ACR but I bought and read Martin Evening's book and Luminous Landscape's video tutorials so consider myself fairly knowledgeable with respect to using LR. Both the book and video made LR seem like it was a smooth and very useable piece of software but I noticed both authors used Macs.
I now have a MacBookPro 15", 2.16GHz Core2Duo, 2GB RAM, 128MB X1600 BUT a 5400 RPM internal hard drive with 80% free. I run my photo library & database on a 5400 RPM USB 2.0 external hard drive and this setup smokes my WinXP setup! The library module with keywording, metadata changes etc is very smooth and the difference between running on two similar systems but with different OS has led me to believe that LR is currently much more refined on the Mac. I can even leave write XMP turned on and it doesn't take any significant performance hit. Scrolling through pages of thumbnails in grid view is fast.
My guess is that performance in Windows will catch up to Mac in future updates. I understand people's frustrations with Lightroom, as I share them, but it's the closest thing to a one-stop shop that I've seen and I am eagerly anticipating updates from Adobe.
In the meantime, my suggestion for those people who MUST use LR now and want the kind of performance they were used to in RawShooterPremium (as a frame of reference) is to use a Mac if they have that option. I'm not more loyal to one OS than another which is why I have both, but I believe in choosing the right tool for the job - same goes for my choice of camera equipment. To run LR smoothly, there's no doubt in my mind that Mac users have it better at the moment. Maybe that's why many LR authors are using Macs as well.
And not to sound critical of new users, but it wouldn't hurt to at least watch the Luminous Landscape Lightroom tutorials before posting questions as I believe it's the best $14.95 I've ever spent on educational material.

No doubt LR runs better on a full blown Mac at this point. But, suggestions that LR users move over to Mac hardware offer a costly solution to a problem that has more dimensions than OS considerations--given that available Ram is 2 gigs or more on either platform.
In order to see just what could be done to maximize LR performance, I put it on a insertable, boot drive with nothing but LR and basic WinXP Pro SP2 on it--no internet, no security overhead,nothing but basic OS and LR. It is noticeably faster than when used on a drive crowded with the usual software variety and load with all the, often redundant, calls on the system from background services, virus checkers, internet connections, etc,etc,etc.
But, it is simply not a fast app by either today's standards of what we expect or in comparison to other apps or combinations of apps that roughly equal what LR will do. The solution to that lies with Adobe engineers--not in throwing money at a different OS.
By the way, I am resonably confident that some serious reengineering will significantly improve LR, hopefully some large portion of that in the next release.
In the meantime, if you want a 20% or so boost, throw it on a small fast boot drive and get a quick change drive tray so you can alternate, or interchange, boot drives in about 10 seconds and not only get better performance out of LR--or Creative Suite, or whatever-- but get lightning fast boot itmes as well--that will cost you about $50--considerably cheaper than changing platforms.

RF Queues User Exit to assign to different queues

Hello SAP Gurus,
I have doubts about the existence of a user exit that can carry out to just the allocation of the TO's with the same WM movement type but with a different type of material.
Example:
Materials: 2 Materials - Cans and bottles.
Type of movement: 101
Main Queue:
- Unpack
Secondary Queues (into main):
- Unpacking Bottle.
- Unpacking Cans.
What I want to know is whether there is a standard user exit that do this segregation of materials depending on the type and assign it to respective queue?
Thanks and Regards,

Hello Jesus,
You must be knowing that TO's created are assigned to various queues on the basis of following types.
1.Putway
2.Picking
3.Posting change
4.Warehouse supervision
I do not have SAP access right now , but I believe we can create number of queues and then assign the TO's manually on the basis of material to different queues through LRF1
The point of using user exit for splitting TO's to differnent queues with respect to material is doubtful.
Regards,
Prashant

Cost center doubt in Itemization of Material Cost Estimate

Hi,
I have one doubt. I creating a material cost estimate of a header material.A new overhead rate ZCDD has been maintained in the costing sheet. An existing crdit key ZC9 has been assigned to the overhead rate ZCDD. The cost element and cost center row has been added in the credit key.
When I run the material cost estimate, the cost element it is coming, but the cost center it is picking is not the one which has been maintained in the credit key.
Can you please clarify my doubt, I am stuck up on this. Please let me know if you need any more information roe clarifications.
Thank you very much.
Prithwiraj.

Hi Rau,
Thanks for the reply.
Can u tell me, is it mandatory to have only one to one Cost Center-Cost element mapping in a Credit Key?
I mean to say is it like that we can assign a cost element of a credit key only to one cost center?
Thanks,
Prithwiraj.

A Doubt on Material and Chapter ID Combination

Hello All,
A Doubt on Material and Chapter ID Combination.
We use HALB materials - for procurement as well as manufacturing. It manufactures certain parts in-house and sells them outside. If there is no manufacturing capacity, we procure same parts from outside and then sells them outside.
How do we enter Material and Chapter ID Combination for such items in J1ID ? Their count is 5000+.
In Material and Chapter ID Combination, when we specify "Material Type" for such items as Raw Materials and manufacture them in-house and sell them outside, SAP does not update RG1 register. It updates RG1 register, only when "Material Type" for such items is RG1.
If we specify "Material Type" for such items as RG1, but procure them from outside, SAP does not update RG 23 registers. It updates RG 23 registers, only when "Material Type" for such items is Raw Materials.
Any solution for the above problem ? Creating a separate material code is out of question.
Thanks and Regards,

Hi,
there is no possibilty to have two differant material type for a material, you may assign the material as RG1 and when you procure the goods you can change the material type as Rawmaterial during MIGO/J1iex so that you will be allowed to take the credit and also the RG23 registers will be updated, there is no other possibility.
Regards,
Murali

Material ledger Conceptual doubt

Dear Guru's,
I have one doubt regarding Activate Actual costing.
What is importance of these below fields.
0              No activity update
1              Activity update not relevant to price determination
2              Activity update relevant to price determination
     If we select "1" what is impact, means whether we have to do month end process at cost center or material ledger. What are the dependencies for this.
or If we select "2", where we have to month end process. in material ledger means where we have to our month end process.
Please explain process. i have read help document. but i am confusing my self.
Thanks,
AK.

Hi Kumar,
You can refer below link related to your query.
Material ledger
Notes: (May be useful)
If you use Actual Costing, you can decide whether (in addition to material consumption) activity consumption on cost centers and process consumption of business processes that are required to produce a material should be updated in the quantity structure in the Actual Costing/Material Ledger.
Depending on which activation type is chosen
Actual consumption is updated in the quantity structure but not considered by price determination.
You can use this setting if you simply want information about the complete actual quantity structure. You can assign variances between the plan price of the cost center/activity type or process, and the actual price calculated at period end to the particular cost object at period-end closing using the function 'Revaluation at Actual Prices'.
Actual consumption is updated in the quantity structure and taken into account for the price determination.
If you choose this setting, the variances between the plan price and the actual price are adjusted subsequently. The cost center or the process is then credited and the material associated with the consumption is debited. In the context of multi-level price determination, these variances can be rolled up through the production structure up to the finished product in the same way that material price variances are rolled up.
If you choose this setting, you cannot use the function 'Revaluation at Actual Prices' at period closing in Cost Object Controlling, as the variances from the cost centers/processes are debited to the material direct. If you do use the function 'Revaluation at Actual Prices' at period closing, the cost centers/processes are credited twice and the materials are debited twice.
BR
Ashok

Doubt in BDC ( Material master)

Hi frnds,
I am creating BDC for material master.In that BDC if i load the data in 'A' mode its work properly. In 'E' Mode in the last page its asking every time for Save, In 'N' Mode its not upload how to do this.
This is my code :
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPLSPO1' '0300'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '=YES'.
***********CALL TRANSACTION************************
CALL TRANSACTION 'MM01' USING bdcdata MODE 'E'
         UPDATE 'A'
        MESSAGES INTO it_bdcmsg.
Thanks,
Gowri.

Hi
May be in 'A' mode you are manually hitting the SAVE and saving
The function code/OK code for SAVE is 'BU' like
    PERFORM bdc_field       USING 'BDC_OKCODE'
                                  '=BU'.
so you have to write this in the last, then it won't ask in E and N modes
may be this is missing in the program see and correct.
Reward points for useful Answers
Regards
Anji

Doubt Regarding Materialized View

Hello,
I am working on Oracle 10g.
We have multiple materialized Views which we Refresh in every 15 mins. My question is that can we get data from these MV's for a particular date....??

When i am Executing a query ..which was mentioned in the earlier post...m getting a particular error.
My Query
select * from db_rational_status_reaffirm_mv as of timestamp sysdate-1
Error m Getting
ORA-01555: snapshot too old : rollback segment number 4 with name "_SYSSMU4$" too small
Any Solution ..?

Doubt on Materialized view

Hi all,
I want to create materialized view, which will refresh the materialized view whenever, there is COMMIT on base table. The following
statement is correct for this requirement.
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW my_MV
BUILD IMMEDIATE
REFRESH COMPLETE
ON COMMIT
AS SELECT * FROM EMP@REMOTEDB;
and my question here is , is START WITH and NEXT values are required to fullfill my requirement.
Thanks,
Pal

Hi,
If U need view to referesh to when base table is committed, then no need of start with and next.
START WITH CLAUSE --- > Specify a datetime expression for the first automatic refresh time
NEXT Clause --->
Specify a datetime expression for calculating the interval between automatic refreshes.
Both the START WITH and NEXT values must evaluate to a time in the future. If you omit the START WITH value, then the database determines the first automatic refresh time by evaluating the NEXT expression with respect to the creation time of the materialized view. If you specify a START WITH value but omit the NEXT value, then the database refreshes the materialized view only once. If you omit both the START WITH and NEXT values, or if you omit the create_mv_refresh entirely, then the database does not automatically refresh the materialized view.
Regards,
Simma,,,

Doubt in creating an material???

Hi,
Am not sure ..IF what i thought was right...plz correct me if am wrg.
In the 1stage of an production order an product is created, which is used an a raw material for 2nd stage of the same order. since I need to operate this 1st stage result product in containers. is it possible that i can create or define it as kanban material??
If so , how do i move . or i mean pack it, to move it to storage location after the 1st stage of production is over ? is the normal Goods movement do be enough to accomplish it??
Plz reply
Thank in advance,
Diana

Hello Diana,
<b>is it possible that i can create or define it as kanban material??</b>
Yes, you can define that as Kanban material which will be used as raw material for second stage.
<b>If so , how do i move . or i mean pack it, to move it to storage location after the 1st stage of production is over ? is the normal Goods movement do be enough to accomplish it??</b>
For the second stage when you create the kanban request, it will create the transfer requirement for raw material from stage one, and you need to replinish/stage it using the LP10/LB10 transaction. This is standard functionality.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Material Master workflow. Doubt?

Hi friends,
I am having a Existing Material Master workflow.
In that there is 1 tcode JI1D.Its working fing before i am modifying below activity.
Now i am modifying this workflow ie i am including 1 CONDITION TYPE in this tcode.
If plant is INDIA then call this JIID.Else skip this tcode.Only if ...else thats all.
Then i moved to PRODUCTION.
Its not triggering for both plant.
Pls suggest
Moosa

Hello,
Did it work in Development?
Did it work in Test?
Did the transport succeed without errors?
Have you done a SWU_OBUF?
How is it not working?
regards
Rick Bakker
Hanabi Technology

Doubt in Material Change BO

Hi
I need to create a workflow, whenever user modify/change or newly assign Inspection type in MM02. I have checked in mm02, which bo is trigger. But i can see in swel A00MARA trigger while change the inspection type or any thing in MM02.
But i checked in SWo1, A00MARA is not available.
My requirement like whenever user assign or modify inspection type in MM02, i want to send mail. Before that i have to identify which BO is trigger.
Can any one help me for that?

First check which event of which object is getting triggered in SWEL transaction code and use that event accordingly. Generally the event changed of BUS1001006 should be triggered. Related with changes in inspection type you have to create a attribute named flag which will check whether the changes has been made in Inspection lot or not. If it is made this attribute should be assigned a value X. Use this attribute to check whether to send mail or not.
Thanks
Arghadip

Material BO Doubt

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for