Material Exclusion Not working in Sales Order

Hi All,
I configured material Listing/Exclusion to make some materials available for(Industrial Sector customer) and exclude for ( Public Sector customer).
I used the following configuration procedures
u2022     Created a Condition table with combination of fields(Sales Organisation, Customer Group and Material).
u2022     Then created two Access sequences   and Assigned the Condition table to each Access Sequence.
u2022     Created two condition Types and Assigned the Access Sequence.
u2022     Created Determination Procedure for Listing/Exclusion and Assigned the Condition Types.
u2022     Then assigned the Determination Procedures(Listing/Exclusion) to Order Document Type.
u2022     Using VB01, I created a condition record for Exclusion, select the sales area, defined the Customer Group as Public Sector and selected all the materials to be excluded.   Also created the condition record for listing with the customer group defined as (_Industrial Sector_ and selected all the valid materials).
When I create the Sales Order the exclusion materials were allowed for the Public Sector Customer.
Could you please tell me what I am doing wrong?
Thanks in advance for your help.
DorisFola.
PS: I am a beginner.

Hello,
Thank you very much, I have tried the suggested solution but it has not solved the problem.
Have you encountered similar problem in the past and is it possible it can be due to the related table not being refreshed?
As someone just told me, it has encountered the problem before and that sometime if the backup tables are not supportive it will not reflect?
Regards Doris.

Similar Messages

Copied layout is not working for Sales order item assinment block

Hi Experts,
I copied the standard componet BT115IT_SLS/items view layout with custom role configuration key and worked fine.
I have added one more field to the item view with the same configuration and saved .When I opended the sales order in the WEB UI , The item assigment block is displaying with complete BTADMINI context fileds and This is the issue.
I have seen configured fields only in the personalization and I have downloaded the items assigment block data to Execl.In the Execl sheet I can able to see the configured fields (availble fileds in the configuration tab in component workbemch) data only.
But Items assignment block is displaying all the fileds (taking from the context node BTADMINI).
I have deleted existing customer configuration and again copied from the standard layout.But I got the same issue.
I have wriiten some code in the ON_NEW_FOCUS and commented the code.Still it not working.
Please help me , where I have done the mistake and provide me some inputs.
Thanks,
Venkky

Hi Experts,
Solved isuues myself.
The problem is inconsistency of BTAdminI context node . I have deleted the view enhancement and again enhanced the view .I copied the layout with customer role key and dispalyed expected layout.
Thanks,
Venkky

Material Mandatory not showing at sales order level error

Hi Every one,
According to my client Requirement at the time of sale order creation material is mandatory , but i tried through Incompletion log
its showing material mandatory but the problem is after entered the material in one line item when i try to save the sales order
system is asking enter the material again ie one more line item
so i have avoid the that error and how to map into SAP system suppose to ask onetime material is mandatory
Can any one guide me how to solve the issue

Hi Prasanna,
As Amit Suggested, in user exit USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE in MV45AFZZ, you need to add a small 2 liner code telling the system that if VBAP-MATRN is blank then give an error message.
I had the same requirement and I have used it and it works perfectly fine for me. Let me know if you have any further questions.
Regards,
Rohan Gudavalli

Both Credit Limit and L/C are not working in Sales Order

Dear All,
We are working on Export scenario where order are created based on L/C and Credit Limit. In my scenario both credit Limit and L/C check is not happening please suggest.
I have created a sales order with value is 1024.00 INR. (My Credit Price is 1024.00 INR)
Customer credit Limit is 50.00 INR. (In FD32)
My L/C value is 1000.00 INR (In VX11N).
I have Implemented Dynamic Check and Assigned L/C to Sales Order. During Order process system blocking the order through Dynamic check. As per the above value System should not block the order. But System blocking the order. When I check Header -> Billing -> Financial Document Log, System showing the value update error. Its comparing entire Netvalue of the Order(1024) with L/C value (1000). How it is possible.
My requirement is system should consider both Credit Limit and L/C value. Please suggest.
Thansk & Regards

No reply received from any body. But there is limit to post the questions to post another one. I am closing this.
Thanks & Regards

Incoming orders in COPA not working if Sales Order blocked for Credit Check

Hi all,
We need to build a report showing all incoming sales order by entry date and/or change date (change of values or quantities later on). COPA allows to do this, but the problem is that COPA line item table is only updated if the sales order is released from credit check (VKM3). I am looking for a solution to be able to record sales orders in COPA even if they are still blocked for credit check. By doing that we will be able to report all sales orders entered from COPA and provide basis for commissions calculation to the business.
I have investigated possible COPA enhancements like COPA0005 but it doesn't seem to be used at the time of sales order save.
Thanks.

Hello ,
Thanks for the reply
As you said , the credit check in the service order is information message "Credit check (maximum percentage for ope
exceeded)" .
If you enter and come out this message then one more message will come , i.e., "The business transaction can not be carried out" detail message - System status CNOK is active (ORD XXXXXXX).
with the above message , system will not allow to do the Service order release.
In this particular case , we have done the VKM1 for the sales order to unblock the order from credit check . But again system is checking the credit check at service order (created w.r.t sales order) . we are not able to control this .
we also suggested the solution to the customer , saying removal of credit check for service orders . But customer requires credit check to happen at both the documents.

Purchase order on Hold is not working from Sales Order document

Hello gurus,
I'm detecting a problem that I have.
I have created a Sales Order and then, this document create a Purchase Requisition in automatic.
So, when I create the purchase order, adopting the purchase requisition, I want to save this as on Hold.
The problem is that the button "Hold" is missing.
But, if I create a purchase requisition and I register the sales order directly (account assignment "E") and then, I create the purchase order, adopting the purchase requisition, the button "Hold" is not missing.
I have active the BADI to Hold, but, it is only mention restrictions with Third Party and Services, not with Sales Order normal.
Could you help me please a.s.a.p.?
Regards,
Sandra Palomo

Application component: MM-PUR-PO-GUI
Function group: MEPO
The Business Add-In (BAdI) ME_HOLD_PO enables you to specify whether an
Enjoy purchase order can be put on hold or whether this function is to be
suppressed in accordance with your requirements.
In the standard system, this function is generally offered during the
creation of an Enjoy purchase order (transaction ME21N) and when a PO
that is on hold is changed (transaction ME22N).
Note
Enjoy purchase orders cannot be put on hold if any of the following
criteria apply:
o The PO contains service items
o The PO contains "third-party" items
o Commitment errors are involved
o Subsequent (period-end volume rebate) settlement is involved
In the case of stock transfers within a company code, the "Hold" function
is generally inactive. If an application object contains an error of any
kind, the function is likewise inactive.

New Condition Table not working in Sales order

Dear All,
I am facing problem in pricing procedure. I have created new condition table(LIFNR & ROUTE), included Vendor(Fwd Agent) and Route in condition table with sales area. I have added that condition table in access sequence and assigned access sequence to condition type. Then Condition type added into pricing procedure and assigned pricing procedure to document type.
In sales order I've added route and fwd agent but while checking in analysis system does not determine route and fwd agent.
Thanks and Regards,
Kaushal

hi,
i have a query to ask why you need LIFNR in condition table creation.
where in sales order it will trigger automatically.
please check the config settings for route determiantion automatically.
so that if route comes automatically into the sales order then from where you will trigger LIFNR.
please clarify.
regards,
balajia.

Exhange Rate not working in sales order

Dear all,
I am facing a problem with exchange rate, I have maintain exchange rate procedure in customer master with exchange rate INR 70 = 1 EUR, Now I am creating Sales order where as i m changing Exchange rate INR 65 = 1 EUR, in sales document header as well line item, but surprisingly system is not considering 65, it is only considering 70, But i want system must consider 65 which i m manually changing in sales order.
Please suggest me to solve the problem
Regards
Shambhu

Shambu,
After changing the Exchange rate are you updating the price by going to Item conditions? If not then update the price by clicking on update button and then select B : Carry out new pricing.
Thanks,
Raja

Material is not editable in sales order

Hello,
we have service order returns (zbre). with reference to returns order we create free of subsequent delivery (zbsd).
but here some times the business wont delivery same material which shows in returns order it replaces different material.
but the sap not allowing change the material in free of charge subsequent delivery.
Regards,
ramesh

Dear,
Since it is a subsequent delivery free of charge, it is standard that that sytem wont allow to change the material .
(as a standard process , we will deliver only the material which was sent and was faulty )
But please try to use the concept of material determination.
This might help in your requirement.
If the issue is closed, please let us know how you resolved the issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Hegal

Order by in MATERIALIZED VIEW not work successfully with first column (ID)

Dears,
I am trying to create a Materialized View as below:
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW HR.MV_EMP
PCTFREE 10
MAXTRANS 255
TABLESPACE users
STORAGE (
INITIAL 65536
MINEXTENTS 1
MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
BUILD IMMEDIATE
REFRESH ON DEMAND
AS
SELECT *
FROM employees
where rownum < 5000 order by employee_id desc ;But while querying the MATERIALIZED VIEW, it did not work successfully as the data did not appear in the accurate order.
I tried to create the same MATERIALIZED VIEW but order by another column (Column Date), it worked successfully and the data appeared in the accurate order.
It means that MATERIALIZED VIEW not work successfully with the first column (id).
Can you please help me in this ?
Thanks & regards,,

A few pointers :
1. As has been pointed out, the ROWNUM has been incorrectly placed. ROWNUM values are assigned as rows are fetched from the source before the ORDER BY. You need to ORDER BY first (in a SubQuery) and then ROWNUM afterwards (outside the SubQuery).
2. I wonder why you want only the last 5000 EMPLOYEE_IDs. What if Employee_ID 1 is still an active employee (he is the founder, first employee and CEO ?). There could be very many "low" EMPLOYEE_IDs that are still active.
3. Logically I would expect some filter other than the ROWNUM ... ORDER BY to be used to select candidate rows. Then, an ORDER BY in the CREATE query would be unnecessary.
4. When querying the Materialized View you must explicitly ORDER BY (irrespective of whether you did or did not do an ORDER BY in the CREATE ...)
5. How do you expect to refresh the MV ? Will it always be a COMPLETE Refresh ? Remember that your "5000 employees" filter would likely exclude older employees at the next refresh. If you use some other filter, it should be consistent across all refreshs.
Hemant K Chitale

Condition type not coming in sales order

Hi,
we have a condition type Z026. The issue is that it is not set in the order but the condition records exists. The pricing analysis shows that condition reocrd is missing but the fact is the condition record is there. The acess seq is Z026 and there are many tables in the acess sequence.
The first table in the access seq is 906 and the condition record exists but still the system says that the condition record is not found using cond preliminary step (header fields like customer/sales org/div). the cond record is maintained for relevant sales org/dist channel/customer/material. cond preliminary step means that system first looks for the header fields but everything is there.
The condition is active and the conditon is created on 21.7.10 with validitity from 21.7.10 to 31.1.2010 and the pricing date in sales order is 27.7.10. so everyhting is fine but yet the condition is not coming in sales order
what could be the issue.
regds

Hi,
Now try creating a sales order with 20.07.2010 as the pricing date. It will work. Create another order with 21.07.2010 and it will not work. If so, it is due to the validity date. When you give 21.07.2010 as validity date and there is already another record which was valid on that date, the gap of one day can happen and we have experienced this. There is even an OSS note explaining this concept, which makes sense business-wise.
However you check the scenarios I have mentioned. If the behaviour is as I have mentioned, then you have to change the pricing date of your problamatic sales order to one day earlier, or move the validity date one day earlier.
If the behaviour is different, pls lemme know

Not Updating Open Sales Orders Value for CreditManagement

Hi Frendz,
This is the first time am implementing creditmanagement in my system tested simple credit limit check working fine.
Now testing Static and Dynamic(Automatic) it also working fine but Its not caliculating open sales orders value either static or dynamic while Creating s.o, settings made clicked on open s.o, i have already created sales orders value of 10th.
EX:- customer balance is 2lacs, credit limit is 1lac while creating s.o it always showing balance 1lac only(Instead of 1lac10th) with open sales order value is 10th.
Let me know Where i have missd settings.
Hari Prasad

hello,
it is maintained against the cr control area in ent structure.
one needs to change there.
r u in prd system or development?
becoz if prd, then this change will effect a lot of ongoing docs.
rgs,
AK

Error when trying to create a delivery note from a sales order - Internal error (-2010) occurred

Hi
I am trying to create a delivery note form a sales order in B1 V9 PL8 and I am getting the following error -
Internal error (-2010) occurred
The code has been working but we seem to be getting problems now
Can anyone suggest anything please ?
Copy of the code attached
Thanks
Andy

Hi Andrew,
Try replacing this line:
odel.Lines.BaseLine = lineno - 1
with this:
odel.Lines.BaseLine = oorder.Lines.LineNum
Beni.

VPRS not coming in sales order

Hi All,
Please look at my scenario and suggest any recommendation.
Sales Org - ABCD is assigned to Company code - ABCD
Order type - standard
Item category(ies) - TAN (with determine cost checked) & TANN (with determine cost checked)
Pricing procedure - has VPRS (with requirement - 4, subtotal - B)
Plant - XYZ (is assigned to Company code - JKLM)
Customer - 12345 (has delivering plant as XYZ on CMR)
Material : KAS010-1
Now, a sales order is placed for customer 12345 from ABCD sales org with XYZ plant on the line items.
Order has 2 line items:
10 KAS010-1 2 TAN $260
20 KAS010-1 3 TANN $0
When I go to line item condition, for both lines, I do not see VPRS. When I looked at the pricing analysis, it says, requirement 04 is not fulfilled.
In the debug mode, it gave me that T001K IS NOT EQUAL TO T001 (i.e. JKLM {company code for plant XYZ} IS NOT EQUAL TO ABCD {company code of ABCD}).
However, still I want to see VPRS on the sales order to map COPA.
Please recommend if there is a way to do it (either by standard or development).
Thanks in advance for your time.

Hi,
For T001K table carry out settings in OMWD
For T001 table carry out settings in IMG >> Financial accounting new >> Financial accounting global settings new >> global parameters for company code >> enter global parameters
kapil

Tax condition(JVAT) of ship to party is not triggering in Sales order

Hi,
Tax condition(JVAT) of ship to party is not triggering in sales order...
Scenario:
Tax condition types:
JCST- CST Payable
JVAT- VAT Payable GJ
Customer Tax classification for JVAT in OVK3:
1- VAT 4%
A- VAT 0%
B- VAT 2%
Material Tax classification for JVAT in OVK4:
0-Tax Exempt
1-Full Tax
In CMR for
Sold to Party:1001(Mumbai), In Sales Area Data(Billing Tab),we have
Country/Name/Tax category/Name/Tax Class./Descrption
IN / INDIA / JCST / CST Payable / 1 / CST 3%
IN / INDIA / JVAT / VAT Pay GJ / 1 / VAT 4%
In CMR for
Ship to Party:2001(Gujarat),In Sales Area Data(Billing Tab),we have
Country/Name/Tax category/Name/Tax Class./Descrption
IN / INDIA / JCST / CST Payable / 1 / CST 3%
IN / INDIA / JVAT / VAT Pay GJ / A / VAT 0%
Access Seq: JLST
Condition table : 368(Country/Region of Del Plant/Region/Tax class1-Cust/Tax Class1-Mat)
Condition record maintained for JVAT as IN/GJ/GJ/1/1 as 4%
Condition record maintained for JVAT as IN/GJ/GJ/A/1 as 0%
Now the sale(Shipping to) is happening in Gujarat..
In sales order
I entered SP:1001 and SH: 2001
When i check the pricing in sales order,condition type JVAT is triggering 4% which is not true as it as to pick 0%
Kindly guide me where i went wrong...
Regards
Azeez.Mohd

Hi Friends.
I found the solution...
Its customization mistake..
Solution:
When we have 'n' tax categories then we should have 'n' condition tables..
I have 2 tax categories: JCST and JVAT but i have only one condition table 368 which is wrong.. i should have 2 condition tables.. so i created another con. table 468 and assigned to access aeq JLST.
then when i create cond. record , we have to select the appropriate table then it will fetch accordingly.. in sales order..
with regards

Material Exclusion Not working in Sales Order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for