Material Ledger not activated in Material Master--Urgent
Dear Gurus,
We have created Material Master of Project Material With tag "Do NOT Cost" but Material ledger not get activated. although In plant material Ledger is activated .
Can any body Help to find out solution
Regrds
Mahesh
*Assign full marks
>
Kishore Kumar Chiluka wrote:
> Hi
>
> Please get in touch with your BASIS consulatant , as the updates are not performing rightly, this seems to be asystem error.
>
> Thanks & Regards
>
> Kishore
Thanks a lot Kishore.
But unfortunately we don't have any Basis Guy separately. I was doubling up as Basis as well APO in my org . I'm pretty new to all these stuff. I searched in help.sap.com about this a lot, but couldn't find anything useful.
Can you help me in identifying a solution to this problem?
Thanks,
Rajesh Manoharan
Similar Messages
-
Material Ledger not activated in both plants within the same company
Hi Experts,
I would like to ask what would be the impact if we activate ML only in one plant. The company code has 2 plants assigned to it. We are currently implementing transfer pricing but only to one plant. What is the impact of activating the PC valuation to other plant under the same company code?
ThanksHi,
Usually to add transportation cost or freight to the material cost at the time of STO we will use the seperate pricing procedure & condition types.
same way we can do one thing..
1)define the seoerate pricing procedure for STO
2)include condiion types for mfg cost, transport cost, margin etc etc & define the condition types in such a way that this all condition type values are get added to inventory.
3)create STO & give values for all condition types in STO
4)create delivery PGI
5)create excise invoice
6)create GRN at receiving plant.
hope its clear.
Regds -
MM closing period problem when material ledger is activated
Hi!
the MM period is opened for period 7,2010, now we want to close that period and open period 10,2010 ( this is sand box system only, so no one used from last 3 months), but when I am executing MMP to close period 8 ( as we have to close periods till 10th period) , system is giving erros saying key duplicate records are not allowed in table "ckmlkev" ( as material ledger is activated), in this table already periods are existed till 9,2010 for all valuation areas.
Now how to close 7th period in MM ( MMPV)?
can any one suggest alternative ways?
regs,
ramesh bHi,
As it's your sand box and you don't need to fix the root cause of the error, try to execute MMPV with option "Close period only".
Regards,
Szymon -
Dump when execute MMPV (Material Ledger is actived)
Hi experts,
This is my scenario:
- We are testing in a Development system (No productive system)
- Material Ledger is actived since 12-2011
- No Material Ledger period end closing made in 12-2011
When we execute MMPV the system shows the dump: SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC
We applied the sap note: 1123034 - MMPV: SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC error in SAPLMLCCS, but the dump continues.
I checked the table ckmlkev and I saw registers to Company Code 0200 Period 2 and Year 2012, however if I check OMSY transaction, I saw only Company Code 0200 Period 1 and Year 2012.
There is something extra to do?
Thanks in advance for your help,
José LuisHi,
This short dump is produced when the system tries to insert a new
entry in table CKMLKEV but a duplicate entry already exists in the same
table.
CKMLKEV indicates in which period which cost component structure is
used for the actual cost component split. CKMLKEV entries are created
by MMPV. Their existance for these periods indicates that the period was
shifted already by MMPV.
What you can do now is the following: please check the period
status in ML.
If the status is undefined, then delete the CKMLKEV entry and re-run
MMPV.
If the status is period opened (or higher), then you have to reset
the MM period.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack -
Material ledger:not distributed variance-URGENT
Dear all,
For raw material A, it issued to certain production order(say FG is B) in Apr. at the month end, I found that there are some variance(not distributed) in material A due to there is no goods receipt for production order. in May. I performed GR for B, then calculate WIP/variance and perform settlement. after that, I run CKMLCP for ML closing.
However, system can not distribute the variance which occurred in the previous month to B, this means this variance will keep in the variance account forever, and the actual cost of B is wrong.
I do not know whether this is standard SAP, our version is ECC6.0.
thanks,
BenHi Ben,
If you don't find the reason for 'not allocated', you should open a message in the system for SAP to check.
Check note 908776. Here you will find all possible reasons:
**'Not included' or 'Not allocated' price differences:
A) The material has multilevel consumption alternatives (processes).
Possible causes:
- Multilevel price determination was not carried out yet.
- Not all subsequent materials were processed by multilevel price
determination. If multilevel step has not been carried out (or
resulted in an error etc.) the price differences remain on the
input material in the 'not allocated' line.
You can verify the Actual BOM for all consumption processes to find
all output materials. You should check the status for multilevel in
all output materials
- the multi level document of one subsequent material is obsolet,
because it is older than the single level or multi level document of
the input material.
You can check this by comparing the time stamps in the documents'
header data.
This situation occurs when the input material was reprocessed by
single level and/or multi level price determination, but not all
depending subsequent materials were reprocessed.
To avoid such error SAP recommends to run multi level price
determination generally with the option:
'materials already processed: process again'.
- For some consumption processes there was no goods receipt of the
output material in the period. In this case the price differences
can not be rolled up by multi level price determination. They
remain as 'not included' ('not allocated') at the input material.
- For some consumption processes, that have different output
materials (joint production) for one of the joint products (the
materials that receive costs according to the apportionment
structure) the goods receipt has not been posted yet. In this case
the differences to be allocated to this joint product remain as
'not included' ('not allocated') at the input material
- One output was calculated with reduced BOM. Typically this happens
if input and output material are part of a cycle, and this cycle
was cut off because it didn't converge. In this case the price
differences of the input were not rolled-up along the cycle
connections and therefore remain on the input material. To verify
if this case applies check the multi level document of the output
material. There must be a red light in the item line of the input
material to indicate that no price differences have been rolled up.
In the header data of the multi level document you can see the
cycle number. Furthermore in the log of multi-level price
determination there may be a message 'Cycle * cut off after *
iterations'.
B) Material has Single level consumption alternatives
- For release 4.7 or higher, the step 'Revaluation of consumption'
was not carried out. (This step is only available with Financials
Extensions).
Regards,
BC -
Standard cost estimation after goods movement when material ledger is activ
Hi!
our client is activated material ledger, for some materials standard cost estimation is done till marking but not released.
goods movements have been posted for those materials.
Now system is not allowing to release the standar price for those material in the current period, as material ledger expects same price for entrie period.
what is the alternative way to update the standard price for those materials ( with out reversing the goods movements).
regs,
rameshHi Ramesh,
When you are using Material Ledger, after goods movemnets for materials, no need to change the standard cost estimate as Actual costing run will take care to derive the PUP price.
If there is no standard cost estimation release for sold materials (e.g.FG), you will get an error message duirng the billing document release to accounting. To aviod this error, if you are using split valuation (valuation types) and mixing ratios (CK91N & CK94), try with the below steps:
Create a new valuation type for the same material
Crate CK11N & CK94,
Run CK11N
Run CK24.
Then release the billing document.
Let me know if you need more details.
Thanks & Regards,
ADI -
Material is not activated error in MM
Hi,
We'vs installed SAP IDES in our Landscape recently. Whenever I tried to create a new material using MM01 transaction code, it creates. But then when I tried to view the same in MM03 or MM02 it throws an error of the following,
The material XXXXX does not exist or is not activated
Message no. M3305
I'm unable to diagonis the problem properly. Will appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Rajesh Manoharan>
Kishore Kumar Chiluka wrote:
> Hi
>
> Please get in touch with your BASIS consulatant , as the updates are not performing rightly, this seems to be asystem error.
>
> Thanks & Regards
>
> Kishore
Thanks a lot Kishore.
But unfortunately we don't have any Basis Guy separately. I was doubling up as Basis as well APO in my org . I'm pretty new to all these stuff. I searched in help.sap.com about this a lot, but couldn't find anything useful.
Can you help me in identifying a solution to this problem?
Thanks,
Rajesh Manoharan -
Hi ,
I am facing one issue in which the material ledger for a material has not been closed for a particular month. We have price difference in beginning and cumulated inventory. Is it because of the price difference ? or can it be due to some exchange rate difference ? How can I check this in system ?
Pls help.
Regards,
GauravHi,
Please check if the material was correctly closed with transaction CKMLCP. Maybe for the material was manually closed without executing transaction CKMLCP. You can verify this if there is a post closing document for the material in that period.
I hope this helps.
Best regards,
MLM -
Material ledger:'not allocated' variance
Dear all,
For raw material A, it issued to certain production order(say FG is B) in Apr. at the month end, I found that there are some variance(not distributed) in material A due to there is no goods receipt for production order. in May. I performed GR for B, then calculate WIP/variance and perform settlement. after that, I run CKMLCP for ML closing.
However, system can not distribute the variance which occurred in the previous month to B, this means this variance will keep in the variance account forever, and the actual cost of B is wrong.
I do not know whether this is standard SAP, our version is ECC6.0.
Is there anyone know why and how it come and settle it ?
thanks very muchDear Jin Ming Zhang,
Please, check the note 908776 which explains the possible reasons for 'not distributed' and 'not allocated' price differences.
There is no automatic procedure, but CKMVFM is a valuable tool to analyse the reason for the differences and distribute/include them.
Best regards,
Antje -
Material ledger period-end closing - material selection based period status
Dear SAP Experts,
The OSS note 980475 describes functionality of excluding materials without inventory and postings from the period-end closing of the material ledger. The system assigns a new period status for materials without inventory and postings (05 "Period opened without inventory"). This period status is set by the dynamic period-closing program for the new period (instead of "Period opened") if the material does not have any inventory.
Could you clarify what is dynamic period-closing program for the new period?
In my system this note is implemented but still during costing closing materials are being selected even though no postings have been done on them in that period and no inventory exists.
Thankk you very much for advise.
Best regards,
RobertHi Robert, have you find out what this dynamic period closing is?is this just the option Check and close period in TCode MMPV? or is het one the CKMLCP steps?
thanx in advance,
Said Dahmaza. -
Material Ledger - Not Distributed when use MR22
Dear All
I do follow step and i have a problem which need your help
1. Create a Mew Materail, price determination: 3 - Single/Multi level
2. GR with Mvt 561.
3. Using MR22 to update valuae for that material.
4. Run CKMLCP -->
I have 2 question
1. When I run CKM3, I saw quantity in the Consumption Group with negative quantity. I don't know why, because I do GR, not do GI
2. After run CKMLCP, I saw a not distributed line.
I aldready config PRDs,
Please help me solve that problem.
Thanks
QuangDDHello Quang,
First of all, do you have any consumption for your material in CKM3?
CKMLCP would not distribute anything if there is no consumption in the material.
The "not distributed" lines are due to 4 different causes explained in SAP Note 908776.
I think your problem though, is that you have an MR22 posting and there is no consumption to apply that variance to.
Hope it helps
Javier -
Material Ledger - not distributed
Dear All.
After I run CKMLCP, I found that some value can't not distributed and it's stored in not distributed category.
I found an unnormal thing in sytem: When I run Settlement, CO88, some Production Order in previous month appear in current period, with a little variance. All of them are completed in previous month and I ran CO88 for them.
Does anyknow why CKMLCP can't ditribute all producion variant to consumption and stock ? Pleas help me.
Thanks and Best regard,
QuangDDHi,
The production order even you settle at the previous month may consume some stock in the current period also.so that the settlemnt is considering that amount in the current month,so check whether the consumption is on which month by running consumption of production order in MB51 or production report.
So it will lead unconsistency in CKMLCP run.so check with the prouction dept & correct the entry & take the CKMLCP run.
Tell me one more thing the cost release is for monthly or periodically.
Regards,
Raj. -
Stock price is in negative (when material ledger is activated)
Hi All
While reversing the GRN for import PO system is throwing the error message stock price is in negative.
Please help it's URGENT.
B. KandreHi,
As it's your sand box and you don't need to fix the root cause of the error, try to execute MMPV with option "Close period only".
Regards,
Szymon -
Material ledger problem raised by material type
Hello Expert
I activated matrial ledger for plant ZNST and also processed production startup. But something strange is that for material with type 'ROW', in MM03 from accounting view, I can see mutiply tabs for current period data, previous period data, future costing run, etc. But for material with type 'Finished', in MM03 from accounting view, it likes the one without mateiral ledger.
Can someone give me a hint? What customizing is missing?
Best Regards
NicoleHello Nicole,
There are some configurations in MM (eg. OMSR, OMS9) under Logistics General >> Material Master where you can customize the screen for the material master and this is at the material type level. Since this is happening for one material type and not for the other then it seems that the problem is there in those configurations. I think it would be better if you can consult your MM counterpart as he would be more conversant with those screens and would be able to help out. You have the hide, display etc. options there.
If you are trying to do that yourself then what you can do is find out the field name and the table name from the material master of ROW Material where it is displayed (you can do this by going to the field , press F1, and then click on the hammer icon in the performance assistant screen). Then in OMS9 you can look for that combination for example "MBEW-MLAST" for the Material Price Determination: Control field. Then you can select the radio button 'display' for the material type FERT.
Please revert back in case you need more help.
Kind Regards // Shaubhik -
The routine is not active in Quality server :Urgent
Hi All,
I have assign the routine in the pricing procedure and it works fine in developement server. But it is not fetching the proper value on the quality server .But the routine shows active on the condition type . Is there anything to do more . The basis people also check that but there is no problem in transport .
Need help ugently.
Regards,
Abhijit Dutta.
SAP -SD .
Call:9920863887.Hi Abhijit,
The new routine must not have been activated properly while transferring to quality system. Execute program RV80HGEN to regenerate all the VOFM routines. The output of this program denotes that all routines were activated
Regards
Nadarajah Pratheb
Maybe you are looking for
-
Atribuição de Contas Contábeis ao CFOP
Na minha empresa a atribuição de contas (exemplo: chave de Operação VS2) utiliza o IVA também como uma forma de separar as contas contabeis de ICMS (Ativo, Consumo, Insumo, etc). É possível realizarmos tal operação utilizando o CFOP ao invés do IVA?
-
I have a large number of epubs / pdfs on my Mac (around 1,000) and I sync perhaps 100 of those at any one time to my iPad and maybe 20 to my iPhone. Whenever I go into iTunes to add more books to a device the list in the Books tab of the iPad proves
-
I have created one RFC Function in that i have called the MIGO BDC. When i execute the RFC in SAP with the parametres the MIGO BDC works perfectly. But when i call the RFC through Legacy System with the same data it is not working. Can you pls. let m
-
My screen keeps saying windows failed to start. A recent software or hardware change might be the cause. Its saying to insert windows installation disc or contact computer manufactuer for assistance. Can someone PLEASE help me.??
-
Convert array of clusters to cluster of arrays without for loop
Hi! Here's a problem: I've got an array of clusters (array of messages). Each cluster consists of elements of different data types: double (time), cluster (parameters), char (station id), byte (message code). I know one cluster size and the array siz