Material Ledger - not distributed

Dear All.
After I run CKMLCP, I found that some value can't not distributed and it's stored in not distributed  category.
I found an unnormal thing in sytem: When I run Settlement, CO88, some Production Order in previous month appear in current period, with a little variance. All of them are completed in previous month and I ran CO88 for them.
Does anyknow why CKMLCP can't ditribute all producion variant to consumption and stock ? Pleas help me.
Thanks and Best regard,
QuangDD

Hi,
The production order even you settle at the previous month may consume some stock in the current period also.so that the settlemnt is considering that amount in the current month,so check whether the consumption is on which month by running consumption of production order in MB51 or production report.
So it will lead unconsistency in CKMLCP run.so check with the prouction dept & correct the entry & take the CKMLCP run.
Tell me one more thing the cost release is for monthly or periodically.
Regards,
Raj.

Similar Messages

  • Material ledger:not distributed variance-URGENT

    Dear all,
    For raw material A, it issued to certain production order(say FG is B) in Apr. at the month end, I found that there are some variance(not distributed) in material A due to there is no goods receipt for production order. in May. I performed GR for B, then calculate WIP/variance and perform settlement. after that, I run CKMLCP for ML closing.
    However, system can not distribute the variance which occurred in the previous month to B, this means this variance will keep in the variance account forever, and the actual cost of B is wrong.
    I do not know whether this is standard SAP, our version is ECC6.0.
    thanks,
    Ben

    Hi Ben,
    If you don't find the reason for 'not allocated', you should open a message in the system for SAP to check.
    Check note 908776. Here you will find all possible reasons:
    **'Not included' or 'Not allocated' price differences:                                                                               
    A) The material has multilevel consumption alternatives (processes).                                                                               
    Possible causes:                                                                               
    -  Multilevel price determination was not carried out yet.             
    -  Not all subsequent materials were processed by multilevel price     
    determination. If multilevel step has not been carried out (or          
    resulted in an error etc.) the price differences remain on the          
    input material in the 'not allocated' line.                                                                               
    You can verify the Actual BOM for all consumption processes to find 
    all output materials. You should check the status for multilevel in     
    all output materials                                                                               
    - the multi level document of one subsequent material is obsolet,       
      because it is older than the single level or multi level document of  
      the  input material.                                                  
      You can check this by comparing the time stamps in the documents'     
      header data.                                                          
      This situation occurs when the input material was reprocessed by      
      single level and/or multi level price determination, but not all      
      depending subsequent materials were reprocessed.                      
      To avoid such error SAP recommends to run multi level price           
      determination generally with the option:                              
      'materials already processed: process again'.                                                                               
    - For some consumption processes there was no goods receipt of the     
    output material in the period. In this case the price differences       
    can not be rolled up by multi level price determination. They           
    remain as 'not included' ('not allocated') at the input material.                                                                               
    -  For some consumption processes, that have different output          
    materials (joint production) for one of the joint products (the         
    materials that receive costs according to the apportionment             
    structure)  the goods receipt has not been posted yet. In this case     
    the differences to be allocated to this joint product remain as         
    'not included' ('not allocated') at the input material                                                                               
    -  One output was calculated with reduced BOM. Typically this happens  
    if input and output material are part of a cycle, and this cycle        
    was cut off because it didn't converge. In this case the price          
    differences of the input were not rolled-up along the cycle             
    connections and therefore remain on the input material. To verify       
    if this case applies check the multi level document of the output       
    material. There must be a red light in the item line of the input       
    material to indicate that no price differences have been rolled up.                                                                               
    In the header data of the multi level document you can see the          
    cycle number. Furthermore in the log of multi-level price               
    determination there may be a message 'Cycle * cut off after *           
    iterations'.                                                                               
    B) Material has Single level consumption alternatives                                                                               
    -  For release 4.7 or higher, the step 'Revaluation of consumption'    
    was not carried out. (This step is only available with Financials       
    Extensions).                                                            
    Regards,
    BC

  • Material Ledger - Not Distributed when use MR22

    Dear All
    I do follow step and i have a problem which need your help
    1. Create a Mew Materail, price determination: 3 - Single/Multi level
    2. GR with Mvt 561.
    3. Using MR22 to update valuae for that material.
    4. Run CKMLCP -->
    I have 2 question
    1. When I run CKM3, I saw quantity in the Consumption Group with negative quantity. I don't know why, because I do GR, not do GI
    2. After run CKMLCP, I saw a not distributed line.
    I aldready config PRDs,
    Please help me solve that problem.
    Thanks
    QuangDD

    Hello Quang,
    First of all, do you have any consumption for your material in CKM3?
    CKMLCP would not distribute anything if there is no consumption in the material.
    The "not distributed" lines are due to 4 different causes explained in SAP Note 908776.
    I think your problem though, is that you have an MR22 posting and there is no consumption to apply that variance to.
    Hope it helps
    Javier

  • Material Ledger not activated in Material Master--Urgent

    Dear Gurus,
    We have created Material Master  of Project Material With tag "Do NOT Cost" but Material ledger not get activated. although In plant material Ledger  is activated .
    Can any body Help to find out solution
    Regrds
    Mahesh
    *Assign full marks

    >
    Kishore Kumar Chiluka wrote:
    > Hi
    >
    > Please get in touch with your BASIS consulatant , as the updates are not performing rightly, this seems to be asystem error.
    >
    > Thanks & Regards
    >
    > Kishore
    Thanks a lot Kishore.
    But unfortunately we don't have any Basis Guy separately. I was doubling up as Basis as well APO in my org . I'm pretty new to all these stuff. I searched in help.sap.com about this a lot, but couldn't find anything useful.
    Can you help me in identifying a solution to this problem?
    Thanks,
    Rajesh Manoharan

  • Material ledger:'not allocated' variance

    Dear all,
    For raw material A, it issued to certain production order(say FG is B) in Apr. at the month end, I found that there are some variance(not distributed) in material A due to there is no goods receipt for production order. in May. I performed GR for B, then calculate WIP/variance and perform settlement. after that, I run CKMLCP for ML closing.
    However, system can not distribute the variance which occurred in the previous month to B, this means this variance will keep in the variance account forever, and the actual cost of B is wrong.
    I do not know whether this is standard SAP, our version is ECC6.0.
    Is there anyone know why and how it come and settle it ?
    thanks very much

    Dear Jin Ming Zhang,
    Please, check the note 908776 which explains the possible reasons for 'not distributed' and 'not allocated' price differences.
    There is no automatic procedure, but CKMVFM is a valuable tool to analyse the reason for the differences and distribute/include them.
    Best regards,
    Antje

  • Material ledger not closed

    Hi ,
    I am facing one issue in which the material ledger for a material has not been closed for a particular month. We have price difference in beginning and cumulated inventory. Is it because of the price difference ? or can it be due to some exchange rate difference ? How can I check this in system ?
    Pls help.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

    Hi,
    Please check if the material was correctly closed with transaction CKMLCP. Maybe for the material was manually closed without executing transaction CKMLCP. You can verify this if there is a post closing document for the material in that period.
    I hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    MLM

  • Material Ledger not activated in both plants within the same company

    Hi Experts,
    I would like to ask what would be the impact if we activate ML only in one plant. The company code has 2 plants assigned to it. We are currently implementing transfer pricing but only to one plant. What is the impact of activating the PC valuation to other plant under the same company code?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Usually to add transportation cost or freight to the material cost at the time of STO we will use the seperate pricing procedure & condition types.
    same way we can do one thing..
    1)define the seoerate pricing procedure for STO
    2)include condiion types for mfg cost, transport cost, margin etc etc & define the condition types in such a way that this all condition type values are get added to inventory.
    3)create STO & give values for all condition types in STO
    4)create delivery PGI
    5)create excise invoice
    6)create GRN at receiving plant.
    hope its clear.
    Regds

  • Not Distributed PPV

    Hi All,
    In material Ledger(CKM3), I have one doubt:
    Material 1: Beginning Inventory:3 & ending inventory:3
    for this material in NOT DISTRIBUTED folder is there
    Material 2: Beginning Inventory:1 & ending inventory:6
    for this material in NOT DISTRIBUTED folder is not there
    Whats the logic behind this folder? Why it has created material:1 but not in the case material 2
    Thanks In advance

    Hi All,
    The NOT DISTRIBUTED are calculated as follows:
    (ending inventory + consumption) - (beg. inv + receipts + other receipt)
    They occur if CKMLPP-PBPOPO is bigger than the cumulative inventory.
    One algorithm would be:
    if CKMLPP-PBPOPO > cumulative inventory
    (Cumulative inventory / CKMLPP-PBPOPO) * price differences = distributed
    price differences
    price differences - distributed price differences = not distributed PRDs
    The note 908776 mentions more details.
    Regards,
    Declan

  • How to activate material ledger field under accounting data

    Hi
    can any body give me solution for following
    i am creating a MIGO for capital Purchase order for (Project capital material-PROJ) with WBS ELEMENT.
    While clicking check button while doing migo error is showing
    "Material xxxx for plant xxxx material ledger not activated"
    when i am trying to change mode under accounting view
    ML ACTIVE FIELD is grey. How to activate this field.
    Please give me solution.
    Thanks
    Nirmal

    tx. OMX1

  • How to set Material Ledger as Productive

    In CKM9 ---> I am getting message as --> Material Ledger Not Yet Productive
    how to set Material Ledger as Productive
    Please help

    IMG->Controlling->Product Cost Controlling->Actual Costing/Material Ledger-> Activate Valuation Areas for Material Ledger
    In this step, you activate the material ledger for valuation areas - Before activating material ledger, check the additional currencies defined in the Co Cd.

  • Material ledger Conceptual doubt

    Dear Guru's,
    I have one doubt regarding Activate Actual costing.
    What is importance of these below fields.
    0              No activity update
    1              Activity update not relevant to price determination
    2              Activity update relevant to price determination
         If we select "1" what is impact, means whether we have to do month end process at cost center or material ledger. What are the dependencies for this.
    or If we select "2", where we have to month end process. in material ledger means where we have to our month end process.
    Please explain process. i have read help document. but i am confusing my self.
    Thanks,
    AK.

    Hi Kumar,
    You can refer below link related to your query.
    Material ledger
    Notes: (May be useful)
    If you use Actual Costing, you can decide whether (in addition to material consumption) activity consumption on cost centers and process consumption of business processes that are required to produce a material should be updated in the quantity structure in the Actual Costing/Material Ledger.
    Depending on which activation type is chosen
    Actual consumption is updated in the quantity structure but not considered by price determination.
    You can use this setting if you simply want information about the complete actual quantity structure. You can assign variances between the plan price of the cost center/activity type or process, and the actual price calculated at period end to the particular cost object at period-end closing using the function 'Revaluation at Actual Prices'.
    Actual consumption is updated in the quantity structure and taken into account for the price determination.
    If you choose this setting, the variances between the plan price and the actual price are adjusted subsequently. The cost center or the process is then credited and the material associated with the consumption is debited. In the context of multi-level price determination, these variances can be rolled up through the production structure up to the finished product in the same way that material price variances are rolled up.
    If you choose this setting, you cannot use the function 'Revaluation at Actual Prices' at period closing in Cost Object Controlling, as the variances from the cost centers/processes are debited to the material direct. If you do use the function 'Revaluation at Actual Prices' at period closing, the cost centers/processes are credited twice and the materials are debited twice.
    BR
    Ashok

  • 0COPC_C04 : Material Ledger Inactive for valuation area

    I ran RSA3 for 0CO_PC_ACT_02 and 0CO_PC_ACT_05 and I get 1000 records respectively. I ran the info package to load this data into BW to 0COPC_C04 . I am getting a message in the status tab " Job termination in the source system". When I look at the job log , it says " Material ledger not active for abcd Valuation area".
    SO I went to OMX1 and I beleive that a while back there was a change to do company code valuation , which got changes to plant valuation ,so this is what I see in the screen:
    Valuation area = 0001
    Company Code = abcd
    Price Det. = 3
    and there is this one records which shows :
    Valuation area = abcd
    Company code = abcd
    Price determination = 3
    and it is not check marked under ML Act . This is only in the dev box , it was fixed in QA and Prod. But never fixed in Dev.
    I am not sure , what to do , also I am not sure if this is what is causing the problem.
    Thanks

    Can some one guide me?
    Thanks

  • T-stock price differences were not distributed by Material ledger

    Dear All,
    We have configured T-stock (Stock in transit) for movement types 601,921 in t-code OMJJ and have assigned this movements types to movement type groups of material ledger in  spro: Controlling -Product Cost Controlling -Actual Costing/Material Ledger -Material Update -Assign Movement Type Groups of Material Ledger. We use movement type group  CF with revaluation of G/L account and CO account assignment .
    Than we have performed operations with T-stock movement types.
    However, in ckm3 we don't see any G/L account in consumption line. In ML document there are no movement type group CF
    During actual costing run (t-code ckmlcp) system requires COC.
    We have analysed CKMLMV005 table data. For movements types with T-stock system puts V_REST in field User-def.name.
    And there are no G/L account.
    How can we solve this issue?
    With best regards,
    Kamila.

    Hi Kamila,
    SIT supports the revaluation to the original account.
    Please check if the ML document has not updated the
    movement type group CF, hence the revaluation of consumption points
    to the COC account.
    Therefore, there are two possible reasons for the revaluation going
    to COC in the example:
    1. The 601 T movement was posted before the customizing was carried out.
    2. The customizing is incomplete for the Revaluation of consumption in transaction OMX0.
    For instance if currently, there is one entry for 601 T:
    601 T L E -> CF
    Please, try to include additional entries for 601T:
    601 T     -> CF
    601 T L   -> CF
    601 T   E -> CF
    Please, try this in a test system, post the 601 T movement afterwards
    and check the results.
    Best regards,
    MLM

  • Material ledger is not active in valuation area C002

    Dear All,
    I have a Scheduling Agreement for a material 'A' with Vendor 'V' with diff prices with validity dates, I did the GR & when i am posting the invoice thro' miro, system is throwing error as above Material ledger is not active in valuation area C002 Why should I activate the material ledger here ? Pls suggest how can i solve this ?
    regds,
    Kallu

    Hi
    For a Particular material, Material Ledger is active or not? Can be checked in Accountig view of Material Master.
    Why we need Material Ledger?
    A fundamental task of the material ledger is carrying inventories in multiple currencies and/or
    valuations.
    Material inventory values are normally carried by the SAP system in one currency. The material
    ledger component enables the R/3 System to carry inventory values in two additional
    currencies/valuations. Therefore, all goods movements in the material ledger are performed in up
    to 3 currencies or valuations. Currency amounts are translated into foreign currencies at
    historical exchange rates directly at the time of posting. Businesses such as those in highinflation
    countries can therefore carry their inventories in a more stable currency (such as US
    dollars). This reveals inflationary effects on inventory values.
    If you use transfer prices to represent value flows in your company in different
    valuation views, you must use the material ledger. This allows you to carry your
    inventories in three different valuations (legal valuation, valuation for reporting
    purposes, and profit center valuation).
    Before activating the material ledger, make sure you know which currencies and valuations
    you want to use, because you cannot go back and change the setting.
    Activating the material ledger is a prerequisite for using multiple valuations.
    Thanks
    Raman

  • Material ledger is not active in valuation area S001

    Dear All,
    I have created a Scheduling Agreement & did the GR. When I am doing invoice posting system is throwing error as Material ledger is not active in valuation area S001
    What might be wrong here ? For same material if I create PO then everything is working fine. Problem is only with SA.
    regds,
    CB

    Hi,
    Please check your Material Ledger Activation  setting for the Valuation AreaC002 in T-code OMX1. The Check box for the ML activation against the Valuation Area-S001 may be ticked.  After activation/ticking this box, T-code CKMSTART was not executed to complete the ML activation.  If you want the activation of Material Ledger, you have to run T-code CKMSTART to complete this ML activation or Otherwise uncheck this box.  I hope this step will resolve your issue.
    Regards
    appalas

Maybe you are looking for

  • Need help with IDOC CREMAS_03 mapping

    i was not able to figure out what values to assign to the following mandatory fields. BEGIN EDI_DC40(node not mandatory) SEGMENT TABNAM DIRECT IDOCTYP MESTYP SNDPOR SNDPRT SNDPRN RCVPOR RCVPRN i am trying to map the following structure to the CREMAS_

  • I want to import my favourites from IE but the import command in Firefox is greyed out

    I've just moed over from IE to Firefox and want to import my favourites from IE using the Firefox import command. But whatever I try I cannot get the import command under the File tab to "ungrey".

  • ODI 10g - session keep a table locked

    Hi, We have a random issue, with ODI session that keep a lock on a table, even replication is finished and session becomes inactive It generated dead locks as a trigger has to update the target table. what happened : - user application create rows (1

  • Lost HDD space

    Hi, I was using Azureus bittorrent when I lost a couple of gigs of harddrive space. The files to be downloaded were to be put straight across to an external usb drive I have. This hasn't been a problem before but it just went crazy today and all this

  • How to change com.sap.portal.usermanagement.admin.par file

    Hi Requirement is 1)using com.sap.portal.usermanagement.admin.par file provide the UserUpdate view(With out developing ur own GUI and code to update the userprofile). 2)Department and Position is not visible to the user at the time of updation. so to