Material Ledger Value Flow Monitor CKMVFM question

Hello,
I am researching the Value Flow Monitor report CKMVFM.  On my test material, it is showing a balance in FI, and a red indicator on the FI/ML status.  I assume this means there is a discrepancy between FI and Material Ledger, but I don't know how to go about researching this.  I have completed all steps in the Closing Cockpit.  How do I explain the difference between FI and ML, or go about reconciling the two?  Thanks in advance for your assistance!

Please Refer OSS : Note 744090 - Value Flow Monitor: Explanation and recommendations

Similar Messages

  • Value Flow Monitor in ML

    Hi Experts,
    Can you explain to me how the Value Flow Monitor transaction CKMVFM works in ML. How to correct the unallocated, and the undistribuited amounts?

    Please Refer OSS : Note 744090 - Value Flow Monitor: Explanation and recommendations

  • Revaluating COPA COGS with Material Ledger values (KE27-B0 curr type)

    While attempting to use transaction KE27 to revaluate COPA with material ledger's cost component structure, we are getting an error for the B0 (Operating Concern Currency) records.  The error (KE 435) states that "Costing Key ML1 does not exist".  I have defined this costing key and it appears to be working for the Company Code (curr type 10) currency records.  Does anyone have any idea why I am unable to restate the Operating Concern Currency records?

    Hi Thomas,
    The system posts the difference between the original values of the line
    item and the new values in a new, separate line item, but in the same
    value fields. To avoid the error message KE435 you have to define for
    the costing key a value field for actual costs for your operating
    concern in customizing :
    Profitability Analysis  -> Master Data  -> Valuation  ->
    Set Up Valuation Using Material Cost Estimate  ->
    Define Access to Actual Costing/Material Ledger ->
    Costing Key for actual Cost Estimate  ->
    Val.Fld Allocatn for Periodic Moving Average Price (total cost)
    That is necessary even though you defined already value fields in
    Cost component structure (cost component split) in customizing :
    Profitability Analysis  -> Master Data  -> Valuation   ->
    Assign Value Fields (transaction KE4R)
    The program expects both entries, one for cost component total cost
    and several for cost component split. If there is a cost component
    split defined for material the valuation will distribute the share of
    costs to the value fields according the definition.
    Only for material without a cost component split the program will
    assign the costs to the value field for total costs.
    Regards,
    Abhisek

  • Material Ledger Close (CKMLCP) -problem executing during the month

    Due to our tight closing schedule, we are attempting to pre-run the Material Ledger close (CKMLCP) process and Value Flow Monitor (CKMVFM) on the last 2 days of the month in order to catch any issues before the first workday of the close, when it is too late to do many of the normal processes that would correct the problems in our system.  The issue we are having is that some of our production plants are 24/7 and we are not getting good results in our test run due to new transactions that get posted while we are running the CKMLCP steps, resetting the material statuses.  For example between the Single level and multi level calculations for a given material, a goods movement might get posted that resets the material status from "single level calculated" back to "quantities and values entered", which leads to errors when the multilevel calculation tries to roll up the WAC variances.
    Has anyone encountered this issue, and how did you get around it?  Currently, we can only think of locking people out of the system while we are running the pre-checks, but we know the users will balk at that suggestion. 
    Thanks,
    Burns Thomas

    Hi Thomas,
    you might try to use the alternative valuation run as a simulation environment.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/d2/cb532d455611d189710000e8322d00/frameset.htm]
    an alterantive valuation run for just one month will create a copy of the ML data in which you will have no problem with material status. the calculation logic for closing is the same, also the reporting, like CKMVFM. Therefore, If you are successfull in closing the AVR that is a good indcator for not having further problems for your real data.
    best regards,
                         Udo

  • Material Ledger - confirmation in different months

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a problem as follows:
    We are using material ledger for actual costing. When we post partial confirmation for a production order in period t, goods receipt and goods issue is posted for period t. However, in some cases, confirmation is posted although one material has not arrived at the factory yet and that material is not assembled on the finished product in period t, but it is assembled in period t+1. In this case, when we close material ledger, we receive an error as "there are nondistributed rows" in transaction CKM3. How can I solve this problem either in logistics side or financial side?
    Thanks and cheers,
    Fatih Zenginer

    Hi Faith,
    Are you familiar with transaction CKMVFM - Value Flow Monitor? You can analyze Not Distributed differences with this transaction. The price limiter is the key.
    Thanks,
    Greg

  • Activation Material Ledger with material working in price control "V"

    Hi experts!
    I have activated Material Ledger and I have a question about this..
    1) Before the activation, I have for example a material with the next values in the "Accounting 1" tab:
    Total stock = 7 UNI
    Price Control = V
    Moving price = 166 USD
    Standard price = 166 USD
    Total value = 1.162 USD  (7 UNI*166 USD)
    2) And after the Material Ledger activation, In the same material appears the next values in the "Accounting 1" tab.
    Total stock = 7 UNI
    Price Control = V
    Standar price = 166 USD
    Per.Unit price = 23,71 USD
    Inventory value = 166 USD
    I don´t understand if my total value before activation was 1.162 USD, when I have activated ML, the new value is 166 USD.
    I dont´t understand why the value for the "Per.Unit price" is 23,71USD and not is 166 USD because this is the original value before ML activation..
    I think that my inventory value must be the same before Material Ledger activation, (1.162 USD)???
    Best Regards
    Manuel

    Hi Shaubhikg:
    At first, thanks for your response.
    I have founded another material wich has the next information before the material ledger activation:
    In the Accounting 1 tab:
    Price control: V
    Moving price: 1.265,80 USD
    Total stock: 5 UNI
    Standard price: 553,00 USD
    Total value: 6.329,00 USD
    After the material Ledger production start up, the same material has the next information in USD:
    Standard price: 553,00 USD
    Per.unit price: 1.265,80 USD
    Price control: V
    Inventory value: 6.329,00 USD
    In this case the total value of the stock is the same after and before to do the activation of ML. I think that this is good..
    And can,t understand the example wich I saw you before.. In that case the Total value of the stock after activation Material Ledger is not the same that before activation..
    The material doesn´t have any modification in his unit of measure..
    Could you tell me someting about this issue??
    Best regards!!
    Manuel

  • Material Ledger -- WIP values

    Hi,
      We have material ledger functionality active and want to extract the WIP values based on the Production Order. Currently we are executing transaction Code CKMLWIPDISP for viewing the WIP details and the values in object currency and controlling area currency are appearing. We want to know the table which provides the above details
    Can anybody suggest the table which will provide us the WIP values based on the Production corder incase if the material ledger active.
    Regards,
    Shree.
    Edited by: Shree Ja on Nov 18, 2010 10:19 AM

    Hello Shree,
    Some more tables
    CKMLCRWIP                      Material Ledger: WIP Period Records (Values)
    CKMLLACRWIP                    ML Activity Types: Period/ Currency Records WIP
    CKMLLAPPWIP                    Ml Activity Types: Period Records WIP (Quantitie
    CKMLMV004WIP                   Process Model: Deductions WIP
    CKMLPPWIP                      Material-Ledger: Period Records WIP (Quantities)
    CKMLWIPCUST                    Customizing: WIP To Actual
    As told earlier I'm not in a position to verify since there are no records in the current system.
    Kind Regards // Shaubhik

  • Material Ledger Question with "Individual PO" process

    Hello All,
    I have a material ledger question related to the individual PO process in SAP where a Sales Order is Created, which automatically generates a Req/PO.  The materials from the Req/PO are received into the plant for which the Req/PO was created, and the Stock type of this material becomes Sales Order Stock. Then a outbound delivery is created to issue the goods to the customer on the original sales order that started this whole process. 
    The issue is that the material ledger is not reflecting the goods receipt at the time we do the goods receipt against the PO, as it does with all other goods receipts.  It will only be reflected once the outbound delivery to the sales order is created.  Therfore the general ledger and the material ledger subsidary are not in balance.  This will not be a problem as long as the sales delivery is created within a few hours as expected, but if the receipt and sales delivery crosses a month end, this will cause an issue. This would also be a problem for us at physical inventory.
    Is this supposed to happen in this process?  Is there a report to show where the outbound deliveries need to still be created for sales orders in this process that can be used for us at month end?   Any help you could provide would be greatly appriciated.  Thank you.

    Interesting issue.
    Just curious... I feel you have done this, but in CKM3, can you key in the Sales Order number in the field provided and then see what the result is? What does it show?
    Cheers.

  • WIP Cumulative value(Material Ledger)

    Hi,
    We have executed the material ledger acutal cost WIP Transaction Code --  COMLWIPDISP. This t.code is reflecting the WIP Cumulative value which is inclusion of WIP Price difference. Cany anybody let me know how this value is calculating and in which t.code. In which table or function module we can see the WIP price difference value and cumulative value.
    Regards,
    Shree J

    Hi SJ,
    The below example will help you to understand your query:
    SFG product standard cost is 90 ( as per the BOM materials).
    Production/Process order is created, released and Raw material are issued to this Production/Process order. The status of this Order is not yet changed to TECO/CNF due to there are still some more operations has to be carriedout. So assume at this stage total cost is 100.
    When you run your month activities like WIP/Variance/Settlement Calculation and also CKMLCP (Actual Costing Run).
    After the month end activities, if you execute COMLWIPDISP, system will display Cummulative WIP value as 100 and difference 10.
    Thanks and Regards,
    ADI

  • Questions in Material Ledger Currency

    Hey Gurus,
    I am having some problems posting documents with MIGO because Iti gives me the error message C+052 (inconsistency in valuation of material).
    While accessing the tcode CKM9 I see that one of the currencies is inconsistent as you can see in the print.
    Do you know if this is the origin of my error? How can I correct it?
    Cumps,
    MB

    Hi Manuel,
    Just a thought, as a follow-up to Owen's comment above ...
    Before you consider the reversal of production startup, consider the following:
    1)  If it is only one material that causes this problem, then consider reversing all material transactions during the current period, close any and all production orders, purchase orders, etc that use this material, and see if a deletion flag can be set, and then use a new material.  If ML close gives you a problem after reversing all the transactions, see if you can change price determination to 2 and then do ML Close.
    2) See if any of the utilities in Material Ledger Help Desk will be helpful in fixing this error.
    3) Above all, consult SAP FIRST before you run reversal of production startup etc.  They may have a simpler solution.
    Of course, I know you will perform all these in a test environment first before you venture anything in Production Environment, right?
    Cheers,
    TD

  • Questions on material ledger

    Dear All,
    i want to activate material ledger in a company code, but i have some concerns that maybe some of you could give me the best suggestion.
    1. is it possible to activate Material Ledger in the middle of SAP operation (i mean in the previous years, we didn't activate the Mat Ledger, just by now we have the idea to activate it)
    2. what are the impacts by activating Material ledger, and some concerns that maybe exist in activating it?
    3. is there any recommended link that gives the steps for activating it? i got some resources, but apparently the steps don't apply to my system, especially the step when I want to set the valuation area as productive (FYI, my SAP version is 4.7)
    Many many thanks!
    Nasikhin

    you may check below notes, hope it can helps:
    Note 596558 - Material ledger production startup
    After activate material ledger, you need to start up the ML using tcode : CKMSTART , then check using CKM9 for detail.

  • Material ledger Price determination change

    For the FERT materials - we have material ledger active, price determination 2 and price control S setup as of now. We have the standard cost for the group and Moving average is calculated for information purposes - now we want the moving average to be periodic.
    I changed the price determiation from 2 to 3 in ML activation but had no impact.
    My questions are:
    1. Should we do this at the material level - so that moving avg does not get updated for each transaction and instead by period.
    2. what are the steps/tcodes to be taken before and after changing the price determination.  I understand we need to run ckmlcp - but need clarity on all the steps I have to do both from config and master data perspective.
    3. Test script steps

    Hi!
    A+ 1st point. Other decision is when you do MMPV.
    B+ I think its better do MMPV on 01/may before do CKMM,  so in point iii, you close of April. If you do CKMM with MMPV active period April, ML will be active for March and April. Again this is just a personal point of view.
    C+ Well, the procedure is correct,  Keep in mind the following: The system consider in your scenario S2 > S3 as Actual Cost of April the value in the standard at the moment of CKMM, so the flow:
    > CKMM > Release Standard>  At the release, system  create a price diff (UMB), that is part of your actual cost (initial of may). The value is the diff of your previews and new standard.
    In the ML Close of april, UMB of MAY  will be cleared and converted in PRY/PRV. If you want details of this, check Standard Cost Release with ML Active.
    Its important you validate it, because if the system dont select this materials, UMB $$ will be part of your P&L account.
    In the ML close of May, this value will be consider part of the actual of May.
    D+ What will happen if the run (iii) above after point (i ) will the ML revaluation will have impact on the material changes to 3S.
    The ML close of april have impact if you post (GM, IR, Settlement) for this materials on April. If this materials are produced, its common that you do the settlement of its order the 1 or 2nd day of may with posting date of april, but as i toldyou is a common procedure.
    E+ Just thinking, Its a good idea you do the ML close for this materials in April (status set to 70)
    If for any reason your ML close dont select them there are some workaround  eg check this oss 1602599 - Additional selection options for selection
    PS1.  Wish this give you more ideas. This topic is interesting and difficult to explain, because have some `depends on`. Again, i recomend you test in your QAS system!
    PS2. This post maybe give you other ideas Material Ledger Activation  - Lot of Questions in startup.
    Arturo.

  • Material ledger is not active in valuation area C002

    Dear All,
    I have a Scheduling Agreement for a material 'A' with Vendor 'V' with diff prices with validity dates, I did the GR & when i am posting the invoice thro' miro, system is throwing error as above Material ledger is not active in valuation area C002 Why should I activate the material ledger here ? Pls suggest how can i solve this ?
    regds,
    Kallu

    Hi
    For a Particular material, Material Ledger is active or not? Can be checked in Accountig view of Material Master.
    Why we need Material Ledger?
    A fundamental task of the material ledger is carrying inventories in multiple currencies and/or
    valuations.
    Material inventory values are normally carried by the SAP system in one currency. The material
    ledger component enables the R/3 System to carry inventory values in two additional
    currencies/valuations. Therefore, all goods movements in the material ledger are performed in up
    to 3 currencies or valuations. Currency amounts are translated into foreign currencies at
    historical exchange rates directly at the time of posting. Businesses such as those in highinflation
    countries can therefore carry their inventories in a more stable currency (such as US
    dollars). This reveals inflationary effects on inventory values.
    If you use transfer prices to represent value flows in your company in different
    valuation views, you must use the material ledger. This allows you to carry your
    inventories in three different valuations (legal valuation, valuation for reporting
    purposes, and profit center valuation).
    Before activating the material ledger, make sure you know which currencies and valuations
    you want to use, because you cannot go back and change the setting.
    Activating the material ledger is a prerequisite for using multiple valuations.
    Thanks
    Raman

  • SRM Product / Material creation - Data flow to SAP MDM

    Dear SAP friends,
    I need your help with 2 issues. Thanks in advance for your collaboration.
    Our client needs to create products and make them available to purchase almost immediately.
    The scenario we had working for the last 2 years was: product creation in SRM (fields: short description / product category / measure unit), that would then be sent to SAP MDM for data enrichment, through BBP_CCM_TRANSFER_CATALOG (JOB running every 1 minute). This solution worked well for the last 2 years.
    Recently, we are having some problems with this job. We noticed that, sometimes SRM doesn´t send the new products to MDM, and we think it´s a report performance problem. The report doesn´t maintain is normal behavior when executed every 1 minute.
    SAP advice is to only run this report once a day. That would obviously require having a minimum time frame of 1 day between product creation and its availability (purchase), which isn´t acceptable in this client business model.
    Question 1: Did anyone have a client with similar requirement? What was the implemented solution?
    Because of report performance problems, we are running it (BBP_CCM_TRANSFER_CATALOG) every 5 minutes. It happens that sometimes, more than one catalog manager creates products in that time frame, and MDIS when importing the products to MDM, creates one unique workflow JOB making it impossible to assign it to both catalog managers for enrichment.
    Question 2: How can we ensure that SRM sends only one product per xml files sent to XI / PI ? Or, perhaps, ensure that XI / PI splits the xml file sent from SRM into several files with one product each.
    Thank you very much for your help in advance,
    Best Regards,
    João S. Carvalho

    Hi meka
    In product costing values flows as follows;
    In product cost calculation raw material prices are costed which comes from material master in MM01
    Product operations: i.e material BOM and master receipe or routings from PP module.From PP module operation costs comes in product costing.
    In CO module: In Tcode KP26 we maintain activity\cost center planning for activities like machine hours, set up hours, labour hours etc.Here we define plan quantity and plan prices.
    In Cost Sheet (KZS2) we maintain base cost elements & overheads and While order creation we calculate planned cost of that particular  material.and then check the variances after getting actual cost of product.
    Hope this will help you and if found useful assign points.
    Let me know if you need more information.
    Regards
    Nilesh.

  • Issue with Standard Cost estimates / Material Ledger

    Background:
    We have been using SAP for the last 5 years with Material Ledger active. Due to a number of reasons, we have not revised its standard cost estimates from 2001 till now. This means that at month end, we do not mark and release prices as recommended, nor do we mark prices and use dynamic release.
    What Happened:
    A new material called PFSW3 was made. This is a FERT. Before production
    could start my team released the standard cost estimate for this material. Production was now able to proceed without problem. Then, when the time came to sell the material (VF02), SAP again raised the error 'cost estimate not found'. On checking the standard price in MM03, we discovered that the future cost estimate was missing. So we created and marked a new cost estimate in the middle of February 2007.
    Problem:
    When the first sale took place, SAP released the marked cost estimate and posted a Price Change document to adjust for the new standard cost. I understand this was due to dynamic release. Now, when month end came, the system settled all the production orders of material PFSW3 but did not do multi level costing on it.
    Internal Investigation:
    My team has determined that the material PFSW3 has price determination 2 set by mistake. All our other production materials (HALB and FERT) are
    set to price determination 3 in the material master (accounting view).
    Questions:
    To sum this situation up,
    we need to know why the material PFSW3 was not marked closed in its period status (CKM3) at the time of closing through CKMLCP?
    What are the implications of not closing this material in Feb 2007 (current period status is showing 'Quantities and values entered')?
    How can we close this material this month?
    The future cost estimate is again missing for PFSW3 in March 2007 and I
    fear we are going to face more problems as this material is sold to customers.
    Please respond this is an urgent issue.

    Dear Shumyl,
    Please, have a look at Note 645083 - Material period status set to "Closing Entry Completed" that might help to closing your material in previous period.
    Hope it will be useful.
    Regards,
    Flaviano.

Maybe you are looking for