Material PO confirmation at supplier side (SUS) not taking place in SRM SUS Extended classic scenario

We have configured extended classic scenario SRM with SUS, and all functions are working fine. However, at the time of PO confirmation of material item at the Supplier side (SUS), the material line item disappears when we click on the Create Confirmation button in SUS. The functionality is working fine for Service Items. The total value of PO is also displayed correctly in the Items overview section.
Please provide some help in solving this issue.

Hello,
This is the correct behaviour of SUS - confirmations can only be created for service items which in turn create service entry sheets (Trx: ML81N in ECC).  And accepting the SES in ML81N will generate GR posting.
For material items, you have to create ASN which will in turn create inbound delivery in ECC which you can post and will generate goods movement documents.
So basically, for service items you create confirmation and for materials you create ASN.
Regards,
Prasanna

Similar Messages

  • ASN in Extended Classic Scenario with SUS

    Hi SRMer?
    Is it possible to create an ASN in SUS with Extended Classic Scenario (ECS)?
    OSS note 543544 mention that the scenario is limited for document types Purchase Order, Purchase Order Response and Change Order. Confirmations and invoices are not possible. There is no indication on ASNs.
    Any help will be appreciated.
    Regards.

    Hi
    Please go through these links ->
    SUS-MM Confirmation without ASN
    Re: Details on ASN
    The specified item was not found.
    SUS  ASN - mandatory field
    ASN Confirmation not created,
    Clarifications on EBP-SUS and MM-SUS Scenario
    Re: SUS-MM scenario with "POR (order ack.)" and ASN for free text
    Creating custom field in ASN screen of SRM SUS
    SUS Invoice
    Regards
    - Atul

  • SUS / no goods receipt doc to backend  in extended classic scenario?

    Hello
        have you any find  a solution for problem
        in SRM/SUS and goods receipt in extended classic scenario. Gr remains  only in SRM not going to backend...
    Brg Harri
    Message was edited by: Harri Harkonen
    Message was edited by: Harri Harkonen

    Hi Christophe,
    We also have this issue. Goods Receipt from SUS is created in SRM but is not posted in backend (we have implemented extended classic scenario).
    I tried to use the BBP_DOC_SAVE_BADI to created an idoc which posts the material document in backend system (using fm IDOC_GR_CREATE).
    The goods receipt is posted in backend this way.
    Unfortunately we are not able to cancel or make a return delivery on this GR.
    I am very interest in your FM. Could you please share this, or tell me what changes you made to the GR in SRM.
    Thanks in advance.
    Rgds,
    Martijn

  • No GR on Confirmation Approval in Extended Classic Scenario

    Hi all gurus out there,
    We are trying to implement confirmation approval workflow in our SRM system. Our SRM version is SRM 3.0 or EBP 4.0 and we are operating in extended classic scenario.
    We implement the approval workflow WS10400002 (1-step approval) and WS10400010 (no approval). WS10400002 is used in situation when an administrator does the confirmation and will go to the requestor for approval. Here, when the requestor approves the confirmation, the status is updated correctly to 'Approved' but no goods receipt is triggered by the system. We looked at the workflow and found that there is no task/activity to do the post goods receipt in the backend system.
    Can someone please confirm whether these are the correct workflows that I should be using and that it is not a bug? I just want to make sure it is not as a result of a standard limitation before going back to SAP.
    Cheers!
    Siow Fong

    Hi Guys,
    I checked with SAP on this and found out that the standard codes would have created the goods receipt. This creation is no longer coded in the workflow itself (like the old workflow used to be). The reason why it was not working for us was a piece of code being added that prevented the creation of the goods receipt.
    Regards
    Siow Fong

  • Freight is not updated in R/3 in the Extended Classic scenario

    Friends,
    Freight is not updated in R/3 in the Extended Classic scenario.
    Once a PO is ordered, if a freight condition in SRM is applied, it does not get updated in R/3.
    We have created a condition for Freight (Value and Percentage)in Create
    Payment Conditions using the following menu path:
    spro
    --> Supplier Relationship Management
    --> SRM Server
    --> Cross-Application Basic Settings
    --> Pricing
    --> Process Payment Conditions
    When creating a Purchase Order in SRM in the "Item Data" tab, there is
    a"Pricing" option. Choose "Pricing" and select "Add Further Conditions"
    from the drop down menu. Here Freight is available. Add Freight and
    the PO record in SRM is updated with the Freight Condition. However,
    upon ordering, the Freight condition does not transfer to the PO
    recordin R/3.
    We've heard this can be achieved by enhancement: only ie by implementing
    set of BADIs..  But does anyone know WHICH BADIs we need?  Or how we could find out?  Thanks.

    Hi
    <b> You can either of these BADIs to handlwe the scenario.</b>
    BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW Exit while creating a purchase order in the backend system
    BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK   OLD Exit while creating a PO in the backend system     
    BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI  ECS: PO Transfer to Logistics Backend                  
    BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI  Control Extended Classic Scenario  
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Can we use the Extended Classic Scenario with MM-SUS

    HI, expert :
        In extended classic scenario ,the PO created in SRM system ,and then replicated into the MM system .You  can't change it  in MM system .
        So, in this situation ,I want to know the MM-SUS can be  suitable or not ?The PO can transfer from ECC  to SUS ?
       If I use the decoupled  scenario  ,which one I can select ?MM-SUS or EBP -sus ?
       BR !
      Alex!

    Hi Alex,
    as noted by Bill, in MM-SUS is the extended classic not possible at all.
    By default it's also not supported in the SRM-SUS. Please see the note 543544. If you would like to activate this, you need to pay a consulting fee for SAP:
    "Please note that the full scenario can be enabled by a consulting solution, compare OSS note 700350."                                  
    Regards,
    Peter

  • Extended Classic Scenario - SHC: Buffer table not up to date

    Hello all,
    I'm working in SRM_SERVER 550, SAPKIBKT11, and having issues using BACKEND PURCHASING ORGANISATIONS and the Extended Classic Scenario.
    According to SAP note 944918 the following indicator should not be required to be set:
    Supplier Relationship Management>SRM Server>Cross-Application Basic Settings>Activate Extended Classic Scenario --> extended classic scenario active.
    I did set the Backend Purch. Grps Responsible indicator, and I did create organizational units specifically for the backend purch. grps.
    We need to set the main part of all SHCs to ECS, but when I do set the indicator in customizing to "extended classic scenario = active", I get a dump in my web environment: 'buffer table not up to date'.
    What is causing this failure in my SHC?
    I tried to implement BAdI "BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI" (method DETERMINE_EXTPO) like described below here: without the line bbp_extpo_gl-bbpexpo = 'X'., I can continue and create the SHCs. Problem is though: all SHCs will get marked as Classic Scenario. So, to make sure the SHCs will always get marked as ECS, I have added this line in the BAdI. Unfortunately this immediately results in the 'buffer table not up to date' error in the SHC itself, as soon as I try to open the details of the new item.
    Hope you help me out here?? It doesn't seem to be related to the BAdI, but somehow the system doesn't allow me to mark SHC items as ECS.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Berend Oosterhoff
    SRM Consultant Accenture Technology Solutions - The Netherlands.
    BAdI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI:
    method IF_EX_BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI~DETERMINE_EXTPO.
    data definition----------------------------------------------------*
      DATA:    wa_mattype     TYPE BAPIMATDOA,
               wa_char18      TYPE MATNR,
               attrib_tab     TYPE TABLE OF bbp_attributes,
               wa_attrib_tab  TYPE bbp_attributes,
               wa_value       TYPE om_attrval,
               wa_product_id  TYPE comt_product_id.
        bbp_extpo_gl-bbpexpo = 'X'.
    from here I did the specific selection for the SC, but that's not relevant here.

    Hi Prashant,
    Thanks for your quick reply!
    Note 1085700 is about Short Dumps when creating or changing a contract. I am trying to create a Shopping Cart, without a reference to a contract. BAdI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI is not active in our system.
    Any other thoughts?
    Regards,
    Berend

  • Use the MM-SUS in Extended Classic Scenario

    HI,my experts :
        The standard function doesn't support the MM-SUS in Extended Classic Scenario .Now I may have two questions about it .
      1、  I have one ECC system .I need handle the invice in the ECC system .In other word ,the invoice rcreated in the SUS should transfer to the MM system .But in EBP-SUS ,the invoice is transfered to the SRM system .What can I do now ?
      2、 If  I  want to use the decoupled scenario ,some POs are create in EBP ,and others are created in MM .Now ,which sus I should select ? EBP-SUS  or MM-SUS?
       Or some detail document about it .
      BR!
       Alex!
    Edited by: Alex on May 25, 2010 9:17 AM

    Khan has explained most of the things.
    The external web service I meant is actually OPI catalog which you need to maintain.
    The same has to be entered in the attribute CAT of the EBP purchaser.
    To maintain the call structure of this catalog
    Get the URL from SE80->BSP appln->ros_prescreen->controller->main.do
    then give the client no of yr ROS client
    the RFC user user ID from EBP to ROS
    it's password
    sap-sessioncmd=open
    sap-language=sy-langu
    the operational purchaser role in EBP (sap_EC_BBP_OP_PURCHASER) should be linked with
    the same in ROS via role menu->business partner->screen supplier->right click->change details
    ->sap-client=ROS client no
    The administrator & op purchaser should be present in ROS org structure also
    & should have same userID & password as EBP
    you have to define the vendor root, the root of the purchasing organization and the currency in
    table BBP_MARKETP_INFO in the SRM System (Enterprise Buyer client).
    BR
    Dinesh

  • Auto Goods Issue not taking place

    Hii All
    I hv Maintained backflush indictor in work center and in MRP2 view it is maintained as Workcenter
    decides whether to backfluch .
    But the auto goods issue is not taking place when the production order is saved and confirmed.
    The stock remains the same ..
    Can anybody tell the reason for that
    Regds
    Rakesh

    Hi Rakesh,
    what is the control key u have maintained in Routing?
    if u r using Control key PP01 - Routing/Ref. op. set - internal proc., then after Production Order confirmation u have to do MB31- Goods Receipt for Order, with movement type 101.
    If u r using PP03 Routing - in-house prod. auto. goods rct, then it accepts only single operation in a Routing (or) if u r having say more than one operations in a routing, then u have to give PP03 control key for the last operation.
    I think u got it...
    revert back if u have doubts.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Santosh

  • SUS-MM vs SUS-EBP (Extended CLassic Scenario)

    Hi!
    We have an extended classic scenario already up and running between ERP->EBP system without XI usage.
    Now it is necessary to configure SUS integration for ASN creation purpose. As I can see SAP has 2 standard configuration guides: one for SUS-MM and another one for SUS-EBP, but they are not fully relevant for ECS.
    Could anybody tell me please from what system EBP or ERP it is better to send PO to SUS system when we are using extended classic scenario? And what are advantages/disadvantages of this?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Siarhei

    Hi Dinesh!
    Thank you for your answer! It is clear that leading PO is in EBP, but why I can't use ORDERS and ORDCHG IDOCs to transfer PO and PO chnages to SUS?
    One other question: do you know whether Configuration Guide for ECS exsits (like SUS-MM and SUS-EBP documents)?
    BR,
    SIarhei
    Edited by: Siarhei Tsikhanenka on Apr 4, 2008 9:56 AM

  • Income tax dedcution is not taking place on medical reimbursement .

    Hi SAP-HR Experts .
    I am facing a issue that for few employees Medical Exemption for incomeTax is not taking place for few employees ,
    like upto Rs. 15000/- amount annually are exempted for Income Tax .
    a employee whose exemption is taking place /3m1 wage type generated , while for those employees for which exempted for Income Tax in not taking place /3m1 is not generating .
    IT-589 is maintained , and having amount 2MER(Medical reimbursement wage type) .
    IT-267 is also having entry for Off-cycle Payment .
    Emp X , having IT-589 , 2MER : 16,200 , for the duration of 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009
    for the month of May-2008 , He claims Rs. 1395.00 .
    He has both wage types 2MER = 1395.00 and /3m1 = 1395.00  .
    Employee X is correct case .
    Emp Y : is wrong case where tax exemption is not taking place .
    having IT-589 , 2MER : 30,600.00 , for the duration of 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009
    for the month of May-2008 , He claims Rs. 2086.00 .
    He has both wage types 2MER = 2086.00 and /3m1 is not here  .
    what is required in ordfer to correct this wrong case (Employee - Y) .
    Thanks & Regards : rajneesh

    Hi Sikinder.
    I have checked the Log of payroll both Correct case 'Emp-X' and wrong case 'Emp-Y'
    Both emps are of same department and same location .
    incase of Emp-X , Payroll-function INMED generates /3m1 wage type
    while in case of EMP-Y it is not generating .
    Why this is happening and how to correct it ?????.
    Regards : rajneesh

  • Command link / button action is not taking place if i use it in iterator.

    Hi,
    I am new to ADF, i am facing 1 issue while implementing ADF mobile browser application.
    Issue: command link / button action is not taking place if i use it in iterator. its just refreshing the page it self and displaying as no records.
    Scenario is i am populating the search results in results page from search page using iterator, i want to get the complete details in different page (results page -> details page) .
    I have tried in different ways.like
    case1:
    <tr:panelGroupLayout id="pgl2" layout="vertical" styleClass="af_m_panelBase">
    <tr:panelHeader text="#{classviewBundle.SEARCH_RESULTS}" id="ph1"/>
    <tr:iterator id="i1" value="#{bindings.SubjectVO1.collectionModel}" var="subject"
    varStatus="subIndx" rows="100">
    <tr:panelBox text="#{subject.Subject} #{subject.CatalogNbr} - #{subject.CourseTitleLong}"
    styleClass="af_m_listingPrimaryDetails" id="pb1">
    <f:facet name="toolbar"/>
    <tr:table var="ssrClass" rowBandingInterval="1" id="t1" value="#{subject.children}"
    varStatus="clsIndx" rowSelection="none"
    binding="#{SessionBean.subjectTable}" verticalGridVisible="true"
    emptyText="No Records" width="100%">
    <tr:column id="c9" sortable="false" styleClass="width:100%">
    <*tr:commandLink text="Section: #{ssrClass.ClassSection}-#{ssrClass.SsrComponentLovDescr} (#{ssrClass.ClassNbr})"*
    id="commandLink2" styleClass="af_m_listingLink"
    *action="#{pageFlowScope.BackingBean.searchaction}"></tr:commandLink>*
    //remaining code
    in this case commandlink action is not able to invoke serachaction() method
    case 2:
    <tr:commandLink text="Section: #{ssrClass.ClassSection}-#{ssrClass.SsrComponentLovDescr} (#{ssrClass.ClassNbr})"
    id="commandLink2" styleClass="af_m_listingLink"
    action="classdetails}"></tr:commandLink>
    in this case its not able to navigate to classdetails page.
    I gave correct navigation cases and rules in taskflow,but its working fine when the command link is out of iterator only.
    i tried with actionlistener too.. but no use.. please help me out of this problem .
    *Update to issue:*
    The actual issue is when i use command link/button in an table/iterator whose parent tag is another iterator then the action is not taking place.
    the structer of my code is
    < iterator1>
    #command link action1
    < iterator2>
    #command link action2
    </ iterator2>
    < /iterator1>
    #command link action1 is working but "#command link action2" is not...
    Thanks
    Shyam
    Edited by: shyam on Dec 26, 2011 5:40 PM

    Hi,
    To solve my problem I used a af:foreach instead.
    <af:forEach items="#{viewScope.DataBySubjectServiceBean.toArray}" var="text">
    <af:commandLink text="#{text.IndTextEn}" action="indicator-selected" id="cl1">
    <af:setActionListener from="#{text.IndCode}" to="#{pageFlowScope.IndicatorCodeParam}" />
    </af:commandLink>
    </af:forEach>
    By the way you need to convert the iterator to an Array using a ManagedBean.
    public Object[] toArray() {
    CollectionModel cm = (CollectionModel) getEL("#{bindings.TView1.collectionModel}");
    indicators = new Object[cm.getRowCount()];
    for(int i=0;i<cm.getRowCount();i++){
    indicators[i] = cm.getRowData(i);
    return indicators;
    public static Object getEL(String expr) {
    FacesContext fc = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
    return fc.getApplication().evaluateExpressionGet(fc,expr,Object.class);
    Hope that helps-
    Edited by: JuJuZ on Jan 3, 2012 12:23 AM
    Add getEL Method

  • Enhancement Section Activated but changes not taking place

    Hello Friends,
    I have been getting a dump error for FM GN_DELIVERY_CREATE_FOR_DIALOG which says that
    "spe_version" does not exist in table "LIPS".
    I found a enhancement option that commented out the perform that lead to the subroutine which has the error code.
    I have activated business function LOG_LE_INTEGRATION via SFW5 which activates among others switch LE_SFWS_SC3.
    I can see the global status of the switch as ON.
    This switch is associated with enhancement spot ES_SAPLV50S which has implemented an enhancement section in inlcude LV50LF14 lines 191 -194
    However, despite activation the changes are not taking place and i am still getting a dump error.
    I am also not able to set a break-point in the FM because the program cannot be generated
    My question is: Is successful program generation a pre-requiste for enhancement source plug-ins to be effective?
    Any pointers would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Minhaj.

    Hi Minhajuddin ,
    With "enhancement spot" we have come across similar short dumps and inactivation of spots even when steps are taken as per procedure.Please check if any notes are available for the same ,since most of the time it fixed the problem.
    Regards
    Byju

  • Extended Classic Scenario not creating backend PO

    Hi All
    We are just starting with SRM (Using SRM 5.0 SRM Server 5.5) and trying to decide to use Classic or Extended Classic.
    I can get the Classic working were an approved SC creates a backend PO without any problem. However when I switch on Extended Classic the backend PO is not created from an apporved SC.
    In RZ20 my error is Shopping cart 1000000080 (PReq. ): BBP_BD 002 Buffer table not up to date and Table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB is empty
    In config I activated the extended classic scenario as well as activating the backend purchasing groups as responsible. Under sourcing I also defined for the relevant product categories as "1 - Sourcing Never Carried out"
    Am I missing something obvious??
    Many thanks for any help.
    Daniel

    Hi Daniel,
    In reference to the info. you have provided, it looks like you have not switched to Extended Classic Scenario properly.
    Once you say you are on ECS, the P.O should get created in SRM and the copy of it should get replicated to R/3.
    As you said you have flagged both the check boxes in SPRO for ECS activation, try activating sourcing also.
    SPRO > IMG > SRM > SRM Server > Sourcing > Choose one Product category for which you want to create shopping cart and set the setting as " Sourcing Always carried out".
    Check whether the approved shopping cart is coming to Sourcing cockpit or not.And from there try to create a P.O by assigning vendor.
    Also ensure that no BADI is activated which converts ECS to Classic scenario for the Product category you have choosen.
    If this cycle woks then definitely what you require will also work.Clarifications are welcome.
    Award points for helpful answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • MM-SUS for the extended classic scenario

    Hi,
    I have done SUS-MM for the classic scenario.
    Did anyone implement SUS-MM  for the extended classic scenario ?
    Did you face any problem or will it be same as 'classic' scenario ?
    Please help
    Thanks
    Pranav

    There shouldn't be any problem especially when the scenarios are concerned. Since the PO's moves from MM-SUS.
    Regards, IA

Maybe you are looking for