Material regrouping in MM02 not reflecting in COPA report

Hi,
In my project during data conversion material was grouped wrongly. We realised it later once we started designing COPA reports. The material is used by seven company codes. The basic material group defined in basic data is used by all company codes while Material group 1,2,3 4 and 5 are used by company specific defined in sales orgs 2 View in MM master(MM01).
I am designing report for three companies by using material group 1,2,3,4 and 5.
We tried changing the material group 1,2,3,4 and 5 for wrongly grouped materials in MM02. But in COPA report these changes are not reflecting. The grouping in report is still as per the data conversion grouping.
Please suggest on how should we rectify our material grouping to reflect in COPA report.
Regds

Hi,
in COPA reports characteristics are read from the COPA tables, they are not dynamically derived at the time of executing the report. In the COPA tables oyu will find the characteristic as derived at the moment of posting the line item.
If the characeristic that you want to rectify is in the definition of your your COPA segments - which you can check through TC KEQ3 - then there is possibility to carry changed master data over to past COPA data.
TC KEND allows you change the existing COPA segments according to current master data. However, it will not make changes to table CE1XXXX, where COPA line items are stored, but changes happen on the segment level (CE4XXXX).
This means that you always see the changes in COPA reports that read from segments, but not in line item based reports.
To change your output from line item based reports I see no other possibilty but to make correcting entries in CE1XXXX using KE21N or KEFC.
If you should consider using KEND please read the documentation for "realignment". It can create problems, for example if you have a SAP BW that is delta-updated from CE11XXX. Also your summarization levels for COPA have to be rebuilt after KEND.

Similar Messages

  • Changes in MM02 not reflecting in COPA lin item report

    Hi,
    In my project during data conversion material was grouped wrongly. We realised it later once we started designing COPA reports. The material is used by seven company codes. The basic material group defined in basic data is used by all company codes while Material group 1,2,3 4 and 5 are used by company specific defined in sales orgs 2 View in MM master(MM01).
    I am designing report for three companies by using material group 1,2,3,4 and 5.
    We tried changing the material group 1,2,3,4 and 5 for wrongly grouped materials in MM02. But in COPA report these changes are not reflecting. The grouping in report is still as per the data conversion grouping.
    Please suggest on how should we rectify our material grouping to reflect in COPA report.
    Regds

    Hi,
    in COPA reports characteristics are read from the COPA tables, they are not dynamically derived at the time of executing the report. In the COPA tables oyu will find the characteristic as derived at the moment of posting the line item.
    If the characeristic that you want to rectify is in the definition of your your COPA segments - which you can check through TC KEQ3 - then there is possibility to carry changed master data over to past COPA data.
    TC KEND allows you change the existing COPA segments according to current master data. However, it will not make changes to table CE1XXXX, where COPA line items are stored, but changes happen on the segment level (CE4XXXX).
    This means that you always see the changes in COPA reports that read from segments, but not in line item based reports.
    To change your output from line item based reports I see no other possibilty but to make correcting entries in CE1XXXX using KE21N or KEFC.
    If you should consider using KEND please read the documentation for "realignment". It can create problems, for example if you have a SAP BW that is delta-updated from CE11XXX. Also your summarization levels for COPA have to be rebuilt after KEND.

  • Total values not reflecting in copa reporting

    Dear All,
    I have configured COPA (Costing based) & assigned all SD condition types to copa value fields.When i execute profitability analysis the report is giving correct output for following example
    Particulers                                     Qty           Amount
    Customer 1
    Sales Domestic (Material No.1)    150        15000
    Sales Domestic (Material No.12)   50           5000
    Sales Domestic (Material No.23)   30           3000
    But the report is reflecting only one entry despite of different line items for same material with different qty .
    Particulers                                Qty     Amount
    Customer 1
    Sales Domestic (Material No.1) 265    26500
    Sales Domestic (Material No.1) 100   10000
    Sales Domestic (Material No.1) 175   17500
    Kindly tell me why this is happening.
    Regards,
    Sany.

    Hi,
    Check report format, if there is filter as per material or not, if it is there then remove the filter and also execute report as per sales order.
    regards,
    sreekanth

  • Sales order values not coming in copa report can been seen in ke24

    hi
    i have did sd and billing and actual settlement through va88
    i can able to values in ke24 actual line items.
    but when i cant able to see values in ke30 copa report aganist sales order characteristic
    and aganist record type A values are not flowing in copa report.
    please help me.
    thanks
    kareem

    hi ajay,
    i have again prepare actual line items report from ke94 ,ke91 and executed report ,
    here for that particular sales order values are flowing through record type C but not flowing for record type A.
    sales order is not displaying for record type A.
    and for that c only revenue and  and  raw material cost is flowing.
    thanks
    kareem

  • Down Payment entries not reflecting in J1INMIS report

    Dear Guru's,
    TDS deducted at  the time of down payment made to vendor is not reflecting in J1inmis report.
    Is J1INMIS report does not reflect down payment entries?
    What will be the reason for this?
    Which alternative report to followed for J1INMIS !!!
    Waiting for your positive reply.
    Regards,
    Sany.

    Hi Sany,
    To update Business Place & Section Code, execute the program given below. After execution of the program run T.Code J1INPP and your issue should get resolved. Let me know if this works.
    Ask the Abaper to write the following Code & execute the program:
    REPORT  ZFI_BUP_SEC_CHANGE.
    TABLES : BSIK,BSAK,BSEG.
    parameters: PA_BELNR TYPE BSEG-BELNR OBLIGATORY,
                PA_BUKRS TYPE BSEG-BUKRS OBLIGATORY,
                PA_GAAHR TYPE BSEG-GJAHR OBLIGATORY.
    PARAMETERS : PA_BUPLA TYPE BSEG-BUPLA NO-DISPLAY,
                 PA_SECCO TYPE BSEG-SECCO NO-DISPLAY.
    PA_BUPLA = 'MUM'.                               (Note : Use the Business place & section Code Used
    PA_SECCO = 'MUM'.                                         in your company code).
    START-OF-SELECTION.
    PERFORM CHANGE_DATA.
    END-OF-SELECTION.
    *&      Form  CHANGE_DATA
          text
    -->  p1        text
    <--  p2        text
    FORM CHANGE_DATA .
    DATA : LT_BSEG TYPE TABLE OF BSEG WITH HEADER LINE,
           LT_BSIK TYPE TABLE OF BSIK WITH HEADER LINE,
           LT_BSAK TYPE TABLE OF BSAK WITH HEADER LINE.
    BSeg updation
    SELECT *
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSEG
    FROM BSEG
    WHERE BUKRS  = PA_BUKRS   AND
          GJAHR  = pa_gaahr   AND
          BELNR = PA_BELNR.
    LOOP AT LT_BSEG.
      IF LT_BSEG-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '26'
         OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '28'
         OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '36'
         OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '38'
         OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '39'.
        LT_BSEG-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
        LT_BSEG-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
        MODIFY BSEG FROM LT_BSEG.
        Write : / LT_BSEG-BELNR, 'Update For BSEG', LT_BSEG-BSCHL,
                  LT_BSEG-BUPLA,LT_BSEG-SECCO.
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    Bsik updation
    SELECT *
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSIK
    FROM BSIK
    WHERE BUKRS  = PA_BUKRS   AND
          GJAHR  = pa_gaahr   AND
          BELNR = PA_BELNR.
    LOOP AT LT_BSIK.
      IF LT_BSIK-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '26'
         OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '28'
         OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '36'
         OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '38'
         OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '39'.
        LT_BSIK-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
        LT_BSIK-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
        MODIFY BSIK FROM LT_BSIK.
        Write : / LT_BSIK-BELNR, 'Update For BSIK', LT_BSIK-BSCHL,
                  LT_BSIK-BUPLA,LT_BSIK-SECCO.
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    BsAk updation
    SELECT *
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSAK
    FROM BSAK
    WHERE BUKRS  = PA_BUKRS   AND
          GJAHR  = pa_gaahr   AND
          BELNR = PA_BELNR.
    LOOP AT LT_BSAK.
      IF LT_BSAK-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '26'
         OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '28'
         OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '36'
         OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '38'
         OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '39'.
        LT_BSAK-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
        LT_BSAK-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
        MODIFY BSAK FROM LT_BSAK.
        Write : / LT_BSAK-BELNR, 'Update For BSAK', LT_BSAK-BSCHL,
                  LT_BSAK-BUPLA,LT_BSAK-SECCO.
      ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    ENDFORM.                    " CHANGE_DATA
    Thank You.

  • PS 2013 - Changing the formula in custom field not reflected in the report columns

    Hi, 
    The company where I work have a Sharepoint environment / EPM 2013 with about seven hundred registered projects. 
    We have a customer demand where it is necessary to change the formula of one of the custom fields of the environment. This field is used in some management reports made ​​in Reporting Services and accessed by the entire board. The report uses as a source
    'MSP_EpmProject_UserView' view. 
    The change in formula was simple, but we found that the change will not be reflected in the reports when the user saves the project in Sharepoint or publish the schedule associated with the Project. 
    I believe this is the expected behavior of the EPM, but I wonder if there is some other way than through the PSI, to publish all environmental projects.  
    Best regards,
    Armando Machado Gonçalves - Sharepoint / EPM 2013

    Hello,
    That is expected, it will not update until the project is open and republished. No automatic way to do this without automating project pro. Publishing all projects via the PSI wont cause the plan to recalculate, the plans will need to be opened.
    Paul
    Paul Mather | Twitter |
    http://pwmather.wordpress.com | CPS

  • Master data updation not reflected in Bex report

    Hi,
    There is a field "Approver" in a report. It will only show the name of the Approver. And recently the same approver name has been changed in MDM system and now the problem is newly changed name is not reflecting the reporting. It shows the only old name in reporting.
    My doubt is, what about already loaded record in BW system. Whether changes will be made for the older data. I mean it is possible to overwrite the approver name stored earlier in BW.
    D Raj

    Hi
    Yes, master is always overwritten.
    load the new value to the  approver Info object.
    in RSA1 -> right click --> activate master data.
    Initially when data loaded, records will be Modified version. when you perform activate master data then M versions records will turn to A version.
    records with A version are only visible in Report.
    If your report is on Aggregates, then you have to perform ACR (attribute change run) to update the same new value in aggregate.
    you can use the program RSDDS_AGGREGATES_MAINTAIN.
    Regards,
    Venkatesh

  • Characteristic Values are not updated in COPA Report

    Dear Gurus
    I have created one characteristics  and derive the value out of derivation rule but the same is not appearing in the COPA Report even though I mapped that Characteristics in my COPA Report.  Please advice and help.
    Sivakumar Subramanian

    Dear Jayaram
    While creating the Derivation Rules I checked the derivation is working fine or not by giving the inputs and it is working and no error in deriving the characteristcis.
    Please help.
    Sivakumar Subramanian

  • Rebate billing doc not reflected in COPA

    I have mapped the rebate condition type BO01 to BO05 with a COPA value field called rebate value already. However, I found that no COPA doc is created after the rebate billing doc is created. Why? How can I check the configuration?
    I have tried in the billing doc simulation transaction and got the following message.
    Document "90000028" is not profit-related and thus could not be transferred
    Message no. KF755
    Diagnosis
    Sales document "90000028" was not transferred to Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) because it is not relevant for the analyses in CO-PA. This can be due to one of the following reasons (among others):
    The document type is not profit-related, such as an inquiry
    The sales document shows zero for the quantity
    The sales document has been denied
    The sales document is locked due to credit reasons
    A rebate doc of course has no qty, and is a credit note, so how should I configure the COPA?
    Thanks,
    Vicki
    Edited by: Po Yee Vicki CHAN on Jul 11, 2008 6:57 AM

    Hi,
    Check tcode KE4I (in IMG of CO-PA).
    I hope this helps you
    Regards,
    Eduardo

  • Sale quantity is not updated in COPA report

    Dear All
    I am using Account based COPA. In the report COGS and the revenue is captured correctly, but the quantity is not coming. While seeing the line items I found that at the time of PGI one line item with +ve quantity is generated and at invoicing one line item with -ve quantity is generated and as a result quantity becomes ZERO.  A screenshot is pasted below for the convenience.
    Can you please help me in finding the error in my configuration or in report.
    Regards
    Rajneesh Saxena

    Hi Rajneesh sir,
    I believed till now that, at the time of PGI only COGS value is transfer to COPA and not even sales quantity in accounting based method, but after observing your thread I need to frame my understanding differently now.
    OK, since the Sales quantity is transfered to COPA at the time of PGI, why we need to transfer again at the time of billing?
    So, my suggestion is why don't you de-assign the quantity field under the billing settings and try? Transaction code KE4M
    Regards...
    Jose

  • Actual cost of spares not reflecting in standard reports

    Hi all,
         we have procured the materials for 2 years and all the materials  are procured as assets and they are being capitalized with INR 0.01 value and when we are using these spares im PM order, the cost of the material is very low.
    can you help me in material management how and where the material procurement cost is captured?

    When you procure the material, and received good receipt than update po history and price store in inforecord if inforecord update, and you can find in material master if that material create in material master record. You can check this way.
    Thanks

  • AMOUNTS ARE NOT REFLECTING CORRECTLY IN REPORT MB51 REPORT.

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing some issue regarding Report MB51. We have sold some material say "X" for the month of Sep. Now when I run the GL for particular store from where we have sold the material it shows sales value for the period. But when I run the report MB51 for material "X" it shows me some different value. Can anyone tell me why it is showing the difference.
    Regards

    Post Author: V361
    CA Forum: General
    You may want to select the "no Printer" option instead, this will force CR to use a higher resolution.  Look in page setup, printer options.

  • COPA Report - Input Selection Fields dynamically not derived in COPA Report

    Dear Friends,
    Please send your valuable inputs for the below issue.
    Client needs the COPA Input parametres ( Period/Year) to be dynamically displayed in the respective column of the COPA Output Report
    I have configured in KE35 , in the Column of the Form as  
    Column 1                 Column 2
    Lead Column          Cumulative Actuals         
                                     $FROM-$TO/$YEAR       .   
    Sales quantity     5000
    Gross revenue     10000
    Sales deductions     2000
    Net Revenue                           8000
    Variable Cost                      3500
    Contribution                         4500
    But still Im unable to get the input fields, such as Period/Year , in the respective Column of the COPA output Report. 
    Client is expecting the report should be as below
    Cumulative actual - Profit Margin Report
    Lead column       Cumulative Actuals
                                              1-  12/2011
    Sales quantity     5000
    Gross revenue     10000
    Sales deductions     2000
    Net Revenue                           8000
    Variable Cost                      3500
    Contribution                         4500
    Advance Thanks
    Sanjai

    Dear Makrand,
    Please look into the following:
    I brought profit center in selection criterion:
    For this I have changed my Form T Code:  KE35:
    General Data Selection :
    Included Profit center along with the controlling Area.
    Then I changed my report:
    KE30:
    Variables Tab:
    Givn Profit center as entry at execution.
    Hope this will helps you......
    Regards,
    Pavan Kumar Arvapally

  • Confirmation - workflow approval agent change not reflected in BI Report

    Hi Experts,
    We have implemented SRM 5.0 and have enabled confirmations for POs and this is a classic scenario.
    When a original approver for the confirmation approval workflow was subsititued by an another user, this information is not part of the BI reports. when I checked the document, there was no change document initiated due to the agent change in the workflow. Due to this the delta upload process for BI, is not uploading this information to the BI system for reporting.
    If I run the full or regenerative mode, then the data is getting populated into the BI system. But I would like the delta process to pick it up.
    1. please let me know how to enable the change document for a confirmation, even when the agent is changed in the workflow.
    2. or if delta process to capture the agent changes within the workflow for confirmation.
    Your help is much appreciated.
    Vijay

    Hi,
    On Which Service Pack are you on?WAD has this feature of re arranging the keyfigures in BI 7.0 for SPS 14...
    Regards,
    Bhagyarekha.

  • Reflection of PRD A/c in COPA Report

    Dear All,
    Can any body please clarify me on the following points:
    1.When we define one Price Diffrence Gain/Loss A/c,Exchange Gain/Loss A/c ,Inventory Diffrences-Gain/Loss A/c and Revaluation of Inventory-Gain/Loss A/c.My point is how the values of gain or loss arising out of these GL accounts will be reflected in COPA Report.(i.e Gain value will be with '-' sign and Loss will be with '+' sign and how net effect will be reflected in the Report)
    2.If the values are not reflected correctly,then should we define GL accounts separately for gain & loss accounts. or
    3.Is there any configuration to be done (if so please let me know steps) to achive the desired results by defining one GL a/c for Gain & Loss.
    Regards
    Subbu

    Hi Subbu
    This is addressed in the standard design itself... Gains and losses are updated with diff signs
    Post a document for each scenario and test for yourself... It will be more clear
    br, Ajay M

Maybe you are looking for