Materials not to be Costed

Hi,
Where in the material master status can I set so that it will not get costed when I run T-code:CK40N?
Thanks,
Teo

Hi
If you do not want to cost the material then in Material master MM02 Select view cost estimate 1 and select the option DO NOT COST. Then the said material will not be costed during cost run.
Kindly check the same & if the answer is helpful kindly assign points
Thanks & Regards
Mahesh

Similar Messages

Report to know the Materials not yet costed

Hi Experts,
Can anyone suggest a standard Report to know the Materials not yet costed in ECC.5
Thanks and Regards

Dear Pradeep,
There are 2 ways of addresing this issue,
1.Either create a new material status in T Code OMS4 which throws an error message related to production order,purchase order
creation and assign it to the materials(products) which does not have any released cost estimate.
Once after taking the cost estimate you can remove this setting from the material master.
2.The other way is using user exitrs which checks whether the material has a released cost estimate or not.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Cost component Split not transferring while costing using Spec Prc Key

Hi Fellow CO consultants,
I have come across an strange scenario in my work could you help me on it . We are using special procurement key to get the prices between cross company code costing while doing costing run the Materials which have the cost component split from KKPAN (costing without quantity structure ) we find an strange behaviour of update of the costing price .
scenario 1:That is Using KKPAN the FG materials are costed with fixed and variable cost and are marked (future ) but not released in the Production plant . Now while doing the CK40n at warehouse level the Cost component split is correctly picked up the receiver plant using the Spec Prc key properly the fixed and variable cost split .
But
Scenario 2: Using KKPAN the FG materials are costed and then price is released and the material price is at current standard price .Now while doing the CK40N run the cost component split is not picking the variable and fixed contribution its picking up the Total price of the material .( this behavior is observed only in materials done with KKPAN other materials with quantity structure provides the variable and fixed itemization even in the current price of the material ) The prerequsite of the transfer control statergy is set as fist to check the future price for the fiscal year and next the current price of the material if no future price exist. The cost component split and the costing variant are the same .
Appreciate your thoughts .. on helping Scenario 2 case why does the cost component split take the fixed and variable cost while the price of the material is in Current.
regards
GK

Dear Prasad
Try masking costing variant too at assignment to plant and co code.
Rajneesh

Pass on lot size" function not supported in costing runs

hi when i am doing cost estimate through ck40n i am getting following error.
Pass on lot size" function not supported in costing runs
Message no. CK463
Diagnosis
You have selected costing variant PPC1 for the costing run. The Pass on lot size indicator is set in this costing variant. Costing variants in which this indicator is set cannot be used by the costing run.
System Response
The costing run is not created.
Procedure
You have the following options:
Reset the Pass on lot size indicator in costing variant PPC1 so that the lot size is not passed on.
Use a different costing variant in which the Pass on lot size indicator is not set.
if any one had found any same king of error please help me in fix it.
thanks
kareem

Probably this might be the cause
Sales order by Costing
Check out the below
Pass On Lot Size
Definition
If this indicator is selected, the system determines the costing lot size using the lot size of the highest material in the BOM and the input quantities of the components.
Use
1) Do not pass on lot size
If this indicator is not selected, the materials further down in the structure are costed in accordance with the lot size in the costing view of the material master record. When the materials in the next-highest costing level are costed, the costing results of the semifinished materials are converted to the lot size of the finished material to calculate the material costs for the finished product.
2) Pass on lot size only with individual requirement
In the MRP view of the material master record, you can specify that a material is planned as an individual requirement. If such a material is added to another material, costing uses the lot size of the highest material.
3) Always pass on lot size
Here, the costs for all the materials in a multi-level BOM are calculated using the costing lot size of the highest material. This function is used principally in sales order costing.
If you are costing sales orders using product costing for a material with a multilevel BOM that is produced in-house, choose 2) or 3) . For those individual requirements materials, from a business management point of view it is recommended that the order lot size be used when costing the material components going into the finished product. On the other hand, materials subject to collective requirements are generally costed using the costing lot size in the material master record.
Thanks

Additive cost not picking in costing run

Hi!
I am using additive costing , while doing costing run system is picking up additive cost for header material, that when BOM exploding, but not picking additive cost for componenets.
for us componets are also having price control "S", standard cost esimate has to run. as per valuation variant planned price will be consider for the standard price for components, where there is no BOM
any suggestions on this?
why additve cost is not picking for materials where there is no BOM explosion.
regs,
ramesh

Hi
If child is not having BOM - Then Maintain a Special Proc Key 20 in the Costing view of Mat Master and whatever price you maintain in the Planned Price Fields -can be released as a cost estimate
In that case, If you maintain additive cost, it does not make sense.. You can straight away maintain the requird price in planned price
br, Ajay M

When not to create cost elements for P&L accounts? Implications?

I noticed some P&L gl accounts are not created as cost elements eg. R&D expense, COGS (posted during SD delivery), sales (posted during SD billing), freight charges, production variance (posted during prod.order settlement), etc.. I'm thinking if cost elements are not created, FI and CO will not reconcile.
Example of our SD delivery posting :
Debit COGS (sales order assignment)
Credit Stock
From above posting, there is amount posted to COGS gl account but no CO assignment except for sales order. Is there supposed to be a follow-up to this posting to reconcile FI with CO ? Or is our setup wrong?
Fyi we do not use CO-PA.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Pixel8 ation on Aug 3, 2010 5:16 PM

Hi,
Sorry, I probably confused things by mentioning Revenue. Your settings are correct, with Revenue defined as a revenue element (11) rather than a cost element (1).
With respect to WIP (P&L), I would create it as a cost element, since it represents the absorption of cost centre costs and materials into the production of goods, even though the goods are not yet complete. When the goods are completed they will be credited in CO-OM and debited to stock using a similar entry. The impact of these credits (to WIP or to Stock) is to move costs out of CO-OM into the goods produced (CoGS). In CO-OM, the net result of Costs less credits to WIP/Stock, indicates the efficiency of your cost centres or the accuracy of your standards.
I would also create the manufacturing variance accounts as Cost Elements and settle them back to your production costs centres (or possibly CO-PA if you used it), since they are also a reflection of the efficiency of your cost centres - i.e. if a Cost Centre manager is not achieving the standards, (s)he should be accountable for the variance, and if you are concerned about reconciling CO-OM and the costs in P&L, you won't reconcile if the variances aren't posted back to CO.
Regards,
Marc

Cost element is not assigned to cost component structure

Dear Team,
While doing the settlemnt through KO88 system is showing the message like below
Cost element 433001 is not assigned to a cost component in CostCompStruct Z1
     Message no. MLCCS 010
Diagnosis
     You have activated the actual cost component split.
     No cost component has been assigned to cost element 433001 origin group
     in cost component structure Z1 for chart of accounts XXX. The system is
     unable to assign the value to a cost component.
System Response
     You cannot carry out posting.
Procedure
     Check whether for this operation the value to be posted is to be
     assigned to this cost element.
User has done tchnically completed from CO side .But system is showing the open status in FI.
So we have suggested to the user to do settlemt through KO88 system is showing the above message .Half of the production orders we can able to close through Ko88. Some of the PO we are facing the above issue.The concern GL account showing by the system is maintained as a sundry receivables a/c.
Please advice how to proceed further.
Thanks for the consideration.
Regards,
Suma

Dear Sir,
System is showing the GL account is not relating the cost element a/c ,The concern account belongs to Sundry receivables account.
The configuration is done correctly with all expenses GL a/c in OKTZ as well WIP accounts assigned corrctly in OKG8.                How the system is showing this account which i am not understanding.
Please advice to resolve.
Thanks for the consideration.
Regards,
Suma

Error in CK11n - The system could not determine a cost component split for

Hi All,
When i run CK11n i have following error:
The system could not determine a cost component split for the internal activity with activity type 502000 of cost center 10100.
Procedure
Check the master data for activity type 502000 of cost center 10100. It is possible that no activity price calculation has been carried out for the cost center.
could any one give me solution
Thanking you.

Well, did you run activity price calculation for the relevant cost center(s)?
The CCS you're using for product costing (either your COGM split, or the auxillary) has been marked as a "primary" cost component split. It wants to break secondary costs down into their cost components, and assign those components to components in its own structure.
Wihout a planned CCS for the activity, this isn't possible. (This is normally calculated by KSPI during planning.)
Either calculate an activity CCS is KSPI, assuming that all the prerequisites are in place for that, or uncheck the "primary cost component split" indicator in your costing variant configuration.

Do not assign to cost center

Hello
I am facing this problem at the time of making entery through Tcode f-02
please let me know if you have any Idea
Thanks
Do not assign to cost center (not active in CO area ASHI and FYear 2007 )
Message no. KI230
Diagnosis
You assigned an account to a cost center. However, no cost centers are active for controlling area ASHI in fiscal year 2007.
System Response
This posting is not allowed.
Procedure
Activate Cost Center Accounting for fiscal year 2007 using CO configuration.

hi
using KEOA1 wont work in this situation as it looks like the cost center accounting is not active in your controling area.
so go to OKKP and activate the cost centre accounting for your controling area and then try again
i am sure this will work
Assign points if useful

F4 help is not available for cost center in Confirmation

Hi
We are working on SRM 4.0
During the Confirmation of services through WEB portal ( F4 ) option is not available for Cost Center
Through GUI ( Backend) we are able to see the Values in Drop down , but when we select them un able to copy them to Confirmation screen.
Through Web front end F4 help also not appearing.
We have applied the OSS Note 935201 in spite of which, it is not working
please give me inputs on it.
Regards,
Neelima
Edited by: S Neelima on Dec 9, 2009 4:54 AM

Any inputs???
Regards,
Neelima

Account not valid for cost center

Hi,
In MR11, I am getting error:
Account 1223000 not valid with cost center or I/O only WBS is allowed.
any ideas?

Remove the cost center and populate WBS element. Looks like that account does not need cost center cost object but needs WBS only.

How to creat commitment for PO PR but not creat statistical cost for GR

Hi,
Quantities and Values in Valuated Project Stock: Example - Material - SAP Library
Planning
Material FIN-M is assigned to network activity V10 and is managed in the project stock for WBS element P/4711.1.
The network type is flagged as appended and apportioned to the WBS.
Before the first MRP planning run or before the planned orders are converted into purchase requisitions or production orders, the following amounts appear in WBS element P/4711.1:
Planned costs of $500,00
Remaining order plan value of $300,00
The MRP controller begins by converting the planned orders. First, the planned order for the material RAW-M is converted into a purchase requisition and the planned order for the material SEMI-M is converted into production order A2.The order type is flagged as not appended and apportioned to the WBS.The remaining order plan value in the WBS element changes by the amount of the internal activities portion of production order A2 to $400,00 (300,00 + 100,00).After the purchase requisition is converted into a purchase order, a cost commitment of $50,00 also appears in WBS element P/4711.1.
External Procurement
Valuated goods are received for the purchase order, but the price is $10 different at $60. Assuming that material RAW-M is price-controlled, this gives rise to a debit posting of $60,00 in the stock account and credit posting of $60 in the GR/IR clearing account (Financial Accounting).If the inventory accounts was created as a cost element in CO, the following appear in WBS element P/4711.1:
Statistical actual costs of $60,00 in the stock cost element
A cost commitment of $0,00
If material RAW-M is price-controlled the standard price is $50,00, the postings in Financial Accounting are: $50,00 debit to a stock account $10,00 debit to a price difference $60,00 credit to the GR/IR clearing account
In this case, the only figure in the WBS element would be statistical actual costs of $50,00.
Above excerpt from SAP help, may I know how to do configuration to creat commitment for PO PR but not creat statistical cost for GR?
Thanks and regards,
Ray

Hello Jie,
if i right assuming your query then PR->PO= Commitment should be created.
but GRN by MIGO=Statistical cost should not create once MIGO if right then actual cost would be 0.
you can activate commitment by OKKP transaction.
And you want to cost should not be statistical after MIGO right?
here solution is cost never statistical type until account assignment object not statistical type this is my assumption.
if this is the issue then check G/L account from the PO. then check that G/L account, whether it is a B/S account or P&L account? I think you have wrongly assigned P&L account.
Regards,
Sanjeev

Value BLANK/SPACE not valid for cost element "Fund"

Hi!
We use funds management in our solution. It has worked fine in development but when doing the module tests we get the following error when creating a shopping cart:
Value BLANK/SPACE not valid for cost element "Fund"
When creating a PR in backend we do not get an error. So it should not be a problem in funds management.
Everything works fine when using BBPSC01 (central)
Any ideas?
Sincerely
Anders
Edited by: Anders Öhrling on Sep 29, 2008 11:33 AM

Ple provide the solution for Problem Resolve.

WM staging of materials not completed for entire quantity

Hi all,
I get this warning when I try to stage materials for a production order:
WM staging of materials not completed for entire quantity
The system allows you to continue with the process but in the end you find that some of the materials are not staged and you may need to create regular TOs for them.
Can anyone suggest how I can fix this problem??
Thank you very much.

Hello,
Please try setting the Complete material staging indicator for the PP interface via:
SPRO->Logistics Execution->Warehouse Management->Interfaces->Define Porduction->Whse Number --> For you warehouse, tick the complete matl staging indicator.
SAP helps do state that " When the system generates transfer orders for transfer requirements from production (PP), this indicator controls whether a complete staging of materials must take place. This means that the system must generate transfer orders for the total quantities of all items in the transfer requirement."
So hopefully, this should help.
Thanks,

Itemization item 00001 does not have a cost element Message no. CKBK024

Hi,
I'm getting the following error message while working with Easy Cost Planning.
Itemization item 00001 does not have a cost element Message no. CKBK024
Can any respond immediately on this.
Required information of this issue:
Costing Variant (std): PS06
Material Valuation: 4 Planned Price, 2 Std Price, 3 Moving Average Price.
Activity Types/Processes: 1 plan Price for the Period, 6 Most Up-to-date Plan Price.
CO Version Plan/Actual
Sub Contracting: 3 Net Quotation Price.
Quotation In Purchasing : Actual Quota Arrangement
External Processing: 3 Net Quotation Price, 4 Gross Quotation Price
OverHead: No Assignment
And Work Center defined fine had the assignment of Activity type and Cost Center.
In KP26, activity type rate defined for period in combination with Cost center and Activity Type.
Then what would be the problem, pl respond immediately.
Vemula

Hi Friends,
I, my self resolved the issue. by considering the following 3 rd strategy in
For Activity Type/Processes: Considered 3rd strategy as below:
Activity Types/Processes: 1 plan Price for the Period, 6 Most Up-to-date Plan Price
and 2 Plan Price as Average of All Fiscal Year Periods.
Now it has been resolved.
Thanks all.
Now it is closed.
Vemula

Materials not to be Costed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for