Matl master Vs storage location

Dear All,
I have created a plant(3000) and assigned two storage location 200 and 201 in SPRO.
I have created a material master for MATRL1 with storage location 200 only and not with 201.
But when i create PO or Contract for MATL1 and storage location 201(for which matl not extended), systems accepts PO or contract.
Whether this is SAP std behaviour?
Regards

>
Venkateshwaran Balaji Kannan wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have created a plant(3000) and assigned two storage location 200 and 201 in SPRO.
>
> I have created a material master for MATRL1 with storage location 200 only and not with 201.
>
> But when i create PO or Contract for MATL1 and storage location 201(for which matl not extended), systems accepts PO or contract.
>
> Whether this is SAP std behaviour?
>
> Regards
In po system checks the storage location assignment with plant through company code-plant assignment...you will face the error while doing MIGO
Regards,
Indranil

Similar Messages

Service master require storage location field

Hi gurus!!!
In operation I use PM03 to enter service master. I require to enter the Storage location but I don't see the field. Is there any way to enter?
Regards
Bern

Hi Bern
Can you brief your issue...
For service master, why u need storage location....????
For components you need storage location....
wats your requirement?
- Pithan

Master data storage location

Hai everybody,
In SAP BW, the cubes and ODS contain the data loaded. They have only dimension tables and fact tables but not any Master data(the texts, attributes & hierarchies). My question is where is the Master data loaded stored? Does SAP has a special location for it or does it need to have another database support to store this data?
Thank you.

Hi Visu,
The master data is stored in master data tables: Like, /BI0/SMATERIAL for Material Values and thier SIDs, /BI0/PMATERIAL for material time independant master data, /BI0/QMATERIAL for material time dependant master data, /BI0/TMATERIAL for Texts and /BI0/HMATERIAL, /BI0/IMATERIAL and /BI0/KMATERIAL for hierarchies.
You can look up the tables in InfoObject maintenances (RSD1) or in SE16 with InfoObject.
Hope this helps...

Storage location exclusion from planning run

Hi All
I have excluded material from planning run by putting storage location exclusion indicator in MMSC for material.
Iam using kanban replenishment.
In material master, production storage location is same as that of put in MMSC.
I have created Planned independent requirement in MD61, when i do MRP system created planned order.
Please inform if storage location is excluded from MRP in MMSC then why system is considering requirement for that material at that storage location.

Hi Krishna
Please read help for Storage location MRP indicator
Storage location MRP indicator
Indicator that you use to exclude storage locations from material requirements planning at plant level.
If you do not set this indicator, stock, requirements, and receipts are included in MRP at plant level.
Use
You can exclude storage locations from MRP at plant level in one of two ways:
By excluding storage location stock from MRP
If storage location stock is excluded from MRP at plant level, no receipts for this storage location will be created in the planning run.
By planning storage location stock separately
If storage location stock is planned separately, the storage location is replenished with goods if the stock falls below the reorder point.

Storage location posting

Dear All,
Im create a MATERIAL MASTER with storage location RAW MATERIAL with valuation type 3000,then Im creating a PO with storage location as SEMI FINISHED goods when im creating goods received in MIGO it will posted with storage location SEMI FINISHED goods stock & in MMBE SEMI FINISHED is showing . My querry is that though im creating material with storage location RAW MATERIAL in PO or in MIGO why rather than RAW MATERIAL storage location why it take SEMI FINISHED OR CONSUMABLE or any other storage location i want it will take only RAW MATERIAL storage location which i'll maintain in MM01 at the time of create MATERIAL MASTER that it will take only the storage location ( RAW MATERIAL ) which I've maintain in in MM01 it wii be at the time of create MATERIAL MASTER .(Those storage location we have maintain in material master at the time of MIGO wiil allow this storage location only otherwise it will not allow to post goods receieve) pls give me the configuration in details points must be rewarded.
Best Regards
Amin

Hi
Goto, OLMB -
> Plant Parameters -
> Choose your Plant and Go into Details -
> Pl. Un Check the Create storage location Automatically Check Box....
Then, Goto -
> OLMB -
> Goods Receipt -
> Create storage Location Automatically -
> here for your 101 movement type, Pl. un check the Create storage location Automatically Check Box....
Then you proceed....the system will not allow you to post in diff. sto.loc. while you are doing MIGO....
Reward if useful
Regards
S.Baskaran

Sub storage location for Finished Goods Material

Hi MM Gurus,
In our organization, FG materials are physically stored under different sub areas, even though the same lies under single storage location in SAP. Currently the users are downloading the stock information into excel and allocating the mentioned physical storage areas
Since the option of creating further storage locations at the same level or going for warehouse management is not feasible for us, can we resolve this issue by going for any sub storage location (sub dividing the existing storage location into physically storage sub areas)?
Requst your valuable suggestions in this regard.
Thanks & Regards,
Vinod

Yes your requirement is possible and I have seen it working in one of our client. They named the sub storage location, as STORAGE BIN, and this storage bin data is stored in material master under storage location view. This input field is created with help of abap.
This way your storage location is distributed under sub storage locations namely storage bin, this way you can create areas of your storage location without turning on warehouse management and then assign materials to the storage location and then to storage bin, thus meeting your requirement.

Deactivate storage location from ATP check

Hi gurus,
can anybody pls help me out of this?
i have a storage location , which i want to deactivate from ATP check in a particular plant
regards
kaisar

hi..
in transaction MMSC set the storage location indicator 1 against that material....
OR
U can go to MRP4 view of the material master at storage location level... and put the indicator to 1.
Regards
Neeraj

MRP for storage locations

Hi,
One ROH material is extended to 2 storage locations (A,B). ROH is a BOM component for 2 intermediates.
ROH Storage location A - Material Master
ROH Storage location B
Each tank cannot go less than 10 tonns and cannot exceed more than 50 tonns
Re order point 25 tonns.
Order lot size is 35 tonns.
MRP will consider only one storage location A during requirements generation, becuase material master updated with storage location A only.
My requirement like MRP should consider the both storage locations during MRP run and generate the requirements as per the re order point for inventory.
Regards,
LV

Hello
I suggest you to use MRP areas to plan each storage location separately.
With MRP areas you can define different MRP parameters for each storage location and they can be planned independently.
See the following link for more details:
Determining and Assigning Storage Locations to the MRP Area - Special Planning Processes - SAP Library
BR
Caetano

Storage Location required entry in Material Master

Hi
My client requirement is, at the time of creation of Material Master, System will ask for Storage Location.Without Storage Location, Icann't create Material Master.
Even if I'll select Plant and Storage LOcation View & Warehouse View, System is not asking the storage Location.
Can anybody suggest me where I'll set the setting so that system will ask for Storage Location mandatory in Material Master.
Thanks & regards
PKB

Hi Raja,
Thanks for your reply.Before Posting the thread, I've already checked these Views what you told.But system is not asking me to enter storage location.
You can check in your system.
System only asking for plant not storage location.Even if we select warehouse view, system is not asking for Storage Location view.
Thanks & Regards
PKB

Default Storage location from the Material master

Can we default the storage location from the material master into the reservation line item in trasaction MB21?

enter the production storage location in material master MRP2 view.
Edited by: Jürgen L. on May 7, 2008 6:52 PM

Material Master Record - How to remove or delete storage location

Dear all,
Is there a way to remove or delete a storage location accidentally extended via MM01 due to extending the general plant view?
I've tried the following:
1. I've used MM06 to flag the particular storage lcoation for deletion. However, when go to MM02 and select the plant view, the storage location that already been flag still exist for selection. I only get the warning prompt "The storage location has been flag for deletion".
2. I tried MMSC attempt to delete and I get either messages with different material master record:
a) "Material not fully maintained for this transaction/event"
OR
b) "Storage location 60BF already exists and cannot be deleted"
P/S: If this question has been asked before by others, please point me to that thread.
I'm grateful for any suggestion. Thanks.
Steven

Hi Jurgen,
I've gone through the data archiving project in the past. I was actually hoping I don't have to go through this big exercise for this minor situation.
The storage locations in the SAP system are fine. The problem is that when I came in to this organization, I found out that the procurement users have accidentally extended material master record to those storage location irrelevant to them. Those users don't post any stock to those accidentally extended storage location. They admit that it was a mistake. So, I don't really have to do stock movement or GI out from those affected storage location because there's nothing in them.
Now that I've initially flag for deletion (MM06) of those mistakes done by those procurement users over the few years counting to 2000+ material master records affected. But the standard behavior of the SAP system allows change to proceed in MM02 except for that warning message MM081. So, I was actually asking around to explore if there's actually an option to make it an error prompt instead and stop the whole change process at MM02 transaction level.
If I may re-confirm, what I've done so far via flaging for deletion of material master record at storage location level - is this the only correct solution available?
Hope this clarifies my intention of opening this thread. Sometimes, users are quite tough in accepting the results from standard SAP system behavior.
Thanks for the time in explaining.
Steven

Please guide me how to include storage location to existing material master

Hi Guru's,
Please guide me how to include storage location to existing material master....
please provide step by step process or provide any documentation that would be helpfull to me...
please let me know of my question is not clear..
Thanks in advance and will give full points....
Srinivas...

Hi
First :- You can define the storage loctions in the plant under the customization :- SPRO -> Enterprise Structure ->Definition -> Materials Management ->Maintain storage location
Once defined under the plant, you can create the same storage locations in the material master
Second :- Under SPRO -> MM -> Inventory -> palnt parameters, for your plant check the field " Create Storage locations Automatically" . This will lead to create new storage locations at the time of GR, even if you have not maintained under step 1.
Hope it answers your question.
Regards,

Archiving material master - storage location

Hi experts,
I am in process of archiving storage locations of few material codes which are split valuated.
Actually material/s are extended to 3-4 storage location and one storage location has to be removed from the same.
i am using transaction code SARA with archiving object MM_MATNR and getting following error -
plant/storage location dependent batch records exist.
please suggest how to correct the error
relevant solution will suitably be rewarded please.
regards,
Pawan Khurana

I had not spoken about the tick for delete in test mode in the selection screen.
I spoke about the variants for test and production run in customizing to your archiving object.
If the variant that is saved for production run, has the tick for test run, then it just will not work.
Further you should select X Complete for Detail log and list for P_PROT_O,
This way you should get spool file that tells you more about errors or succesfull archived items.
What did you do with the box in from of "Consider batch record without deletion flag" ?
If empty, are you sure you have manually set the deletion indicator in MSC2N?
What about the other boxes in this options section?

Mass Storage Location Extention in Material Master

Hi,
Would like to how to do mass extention of material for storage location.
Regards,
Vengat

hi
use trannsaction code MMSC this willbe plant specific
or use MMSC_MASS
regards
kunal

Block Storage Location for Material Movement

Dear MM Gurus,
pl let us know how to block storage location for a material in Plant.
Requirement is transfer posting (MIGO) should not allow by using 311 mov type in sloc, error message to receive.
example ;
material ; 5000
sloc ; 0001
sloc ; 0002
migo-transfer posting should not happen by using 311
5000
0001 - to 0002
we want to block sloc-0002, how to block sloc, pl help if any solution available.
thanx in advance
regards
srihari

Hi,
You can block the material completely for any movement type by checking <b>X Plant matl status</b> in Basic data view of material master.Or if you want to block specific movement type it will have to done thro authorisation but will apply to all materials .Here the authorisation object M_MSEG_LGO can be worked to remove the movement type or storage loaction .
Dhruba

Matl master Vs storage location

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for