Mavericks compatibility issues with third party displays

I just upgraded from mountain lion to os x mavericks v10.9.3. I use a three-year-old macbook pro with two peripheral third-party displays, each of which is connected to a Diamond adapter which I connect to a Belkin hub that connects to the computer. I had no problems with Mountain Lion after I upgraded from Snow Leopard once I downloaded the Diamond adapter drivers lost in the upgrade.
Now that I've upgraded to mavericks, only one of my two peripheral displays is receiving a signal. An apple tech advisor suggested that mavericks might be incompatible with the Belkin hub. I haven't been able to reach Belkin on this as yet.
Anyone experience this issue and have a fix for it?

The [Note 1051764 - GEN: Skip employee for 3PR evaluation|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1051764] may help you.
Regards,
Raymond

Similar Messages

Anyone else having issues with third party changers saying "this accessory not supported". I get it every time I plug my phone. It only started after the iOS 7 updates

Anyone else having issues with third party changers saying "this accessory not supported". I get it every time I plug my phone. It only started after the iOS 7 update?

That's because part of iOS7 had code in it to look for and recognize unsigned cables.
In other words, Apple knew that people used non-signed ones and didn't care....until last month when they decided to care. People with iOS6 and lower should experience no issues (unless Apple patches those iOS versions) but folks with iOS7 will need to deal with it.

IPad photo issues with third party apps

Up until recently I've had no problem with the issue I'm about to describe.
When I download my raw format photos from my camera using the SD card reader I cannot view full photos in any third party apps such as the Photoshop app or any other I've tried. I just get a small thumbnail version, very low res. I can view them fine in the iPad photos app. If I sync my iPad with my computer and put the photos back into the iPad with iTunes they work fine with all my third party photo apps. Any suggestions?

This appears to be a problem that cropped up with iOS 4. Prior to iOS 4, when a third party app would allow a user to browse to a RAW photo, the app would get a jpeg representation that was generally of high resolution.
As of iOS 4, when third party apps get an image from these RAW images through the Photo Library the image that is retuned is of a very low (thumbnail) resolution. In our testing this appears to be limited to RAW images from Nikon cameras. When you sync your iPad the RAW photos are processed and then resync'd as jpegs on your iPad. You'll find these photos will now show up at the expected resolution once they go through the syncing process.
We reported the bug to Apple and have not had any luck in getting any assistance for a work around through Developer Technical Support. They have explained that the iOS always grabs the jpeg preview from a RAW photo's data. Presumably if the particular RAW format does not include a jpeg preview you'd get nothing, but we do not have the data to indicate if there are any formats out there that don't store a jpeg preview as well as the RAW data.
You will find that a couple of third party apps have found some work-around to the issue. To date our only idea has been to access the RAW image directly and parse it for the jpeg preview ourselves. We are hoping the issue is resolved in the next version of the iOS, but don't have any information yet to indicate that it will or will not be.
Good Luck!

Serious Issue with "third party subscriptions" through text messages.

Forgive me for perhaps sounding dramatic. After having this experience I nearly paid the fee to break my contract and quit on cell phones all together. If apple gets the iPhone to a point where no cellular carrier is neccessary I will be the first to join the party. I'm going to start trying this skype thing this weekend. Anyway, I digress, here's what happened. I get my bill from AT&T and there is a charge for download activity for $3.99. Not the end of the world but I call the number to find out what the charge is all about because I thought I had an unlimited data plan. Turns out AT&T calls it a third party subscription fee. I argued that if AT&T is charging it on my bill as far as I'm concerned I'm not concerned about the details, I hold AT&T responsable for what they put on my bill. According to AT&T's rep I recieved a text message asking me if I wished to subscribe to their service. I don't do the text thing so I never read any message like this. HERE'S THE KICKER - BECAUSE I DID NOT RESPOND TO THE TEXT TO SAY NO THANKS I WAS AUTOMATICLY ENTERED INTO AN ILLEGAL CONTRACT TO PAY $3.99 MONTHLY FOR A SERVICE I'M NOT EVEN AWARE OF. I was absolutly irate. The ramifications are astronomical. This means I could get a limitless unexpected bill. I look at it this way: If I had to write a letter, address an envelope, and lick a stamp every time I got an advertisement in my snailmailbox, I would never get out of the house and I would have to get on welfare to afford the stamps. To me there is an obvious legal precidence here. I realize that this has more to do with AT&T than Apple. I simply want to emplore Apple to save us from a world of disintigrating business ethic. Cellular providers have gotten completely out of control. When I feel like I need a lawyer just to call AT&T to discuss the inconsistency of my bill there is a serious problem. I feel like entering into a contract with a cellular provider endangers my financial stability in a fragile era. It just seems rediculous for a business to become so arogant that they can speak nonsense to a customer and we are put in a position to defend against such nonsense. Several of my friends have run into the same issue with text third party subscriptions. Last night at a dinner party three indicated that they finally had all the cellular provider crap they could take and they canceled their iPhone service and put it up on ebay. I love my iPhone, it is the most useful piece of technology I have ever had the pleasure to enjoy. That being said, I cannot justify, as a household provider with a family depending on me, taking the risk of financial ruin (a $3000+ cell phone bill could do just that) initiated by arogant buisiness practaces that resemble the oppression I have witnessed through 12 years of military service in places with an excess of sand. I think it is apauling. I believe the FCC and FTC need to be brought into this. I intend to submit formal complaints to both and would encourage others that feel like I do to do the same.

Not to diss those trying to be helpful, but the do not call list has nothing to do with spam TXT messages sent from a computer, which is where the OP's problem probably began.
If a third party sent this message and then signed the OP up for a service he did not want, this violates any number of consumer laws and can be addressed that way. It's unclear whether this is really an AT&T issue at all, absent any evidence that it is their message or their service. It sounds to me like the CS reps do not understand the problem and are giving the not-helpful generic answer about spam TXTs. A much better solution is to set the SMS filters using AT&T's web site.
Similar scams work on landlines, where you can accidentally end up getting a huge charge on your phone bill for something that has nothing to do with the carrier.
I'd call the state consumer protection department.
-dan

Volume issues with third-party tele-conference service

A client is requried to join a conference call hosted by third-party Genesys Conferencing (866.436.3797). My client accesses the teleconference through the speakerphone of their Cisco SPA525G2, lcoated in a Board Room.
They have a UC-540 with the next to lates firmware and they have no other volume issues with any call on this or any other speakerphone.
Any ideas?

You could try this link here it will show you how to use the HH off another router as a slave and still be able to use BB talk
(If I have helped you in any way to say "Thank You" please click on the star next to the message. Thank You)
If I have solved your Issue please click the "Mark as accepted solution" button.

Issue with Third Party Adapter for custom JCA Connector in Oracle 11g.

Hi,
For a proof of concept, I have created my own JCA Connector. I have deployed this connector in Weblogic and it works as expected.
Now I am trying to call the JCA Connecter from the SOA Bus. For this I have create a SCA Composite with a simple Web Service to expose the composite, a Third Party Adaptor to wrap the JCA Connector and a Mediator to wire the Web Service and the Third Party Adapter together. For the Third Party Adapter I have created both the needed *.wsdl and _3P.jca file my self. The problem is that I could not find any documentation about the _3P.jca file, and it looks like it that this file is new for 11g.
After some puzzling and debugging I am able to deploy the SCA Composite with the Third Party Adapter. Though when I test the exposed Web Service with the Enterprise Manager I get errors and a stack trace. The problem is that the Record Converter I have created receives the default XMLRecord implementation (oracle.tip.adapter.fw.record.XMLRecordImpl) and not the implementation of the XMLRecord I have created my self.
So the question is does anybody know how to configure the Third Party Adapter so that it will use my custom implemenation of the XMLRecord interface (oracle.tip.adapter.api.record.XMLRecord) instead of the default implementation of the XMLRecord (oracle.tip.adapter.fw.record.XMLRecordImpl).
I would suspect that it should be configured in the _3P.jca file, though I don't know how. The following is the content of the current _3P.jca file I am using.
<adapter-config name="DiskAdapter" adapter="Disk Adapter" wsdlLocation="JCADiskConnector.wsdl"
                xmlns="http://platform.integration.oracle/blocks/adapter/fw/metadata">
<record-converter className="com.osc.jcaadapter.convert.DiskRecordConverter"/>
<connection-factory location="jndi/diskcf" adapterRef=""/>
<endpoint-interaction operation="Send" portType="Send_ptt">
    <use-record-converter addonNamespace="http://somecomp.com/DiskAdapter"/>
    <interaction-spec className="com.osc.jcaadapter.impl.DiskInteractionSpecImpl">
      <property name="FunctionName" value="do-it"/>
    </interaction-spec>
</endpoint-interaction>
</adapter-config>So I am hoping that some one knows how you should configure the Third Party Adapter so it uses my own implementation of the XMLRecord interface.

Hi Simeon,
That is a good suggestion, and I would certainly try to do that if I was not making a proof of concept. It would solve my problem of not getting the sub class of the XMLRecord.
Though for making my proof of concept I found a 10g example that used sub classes of the XMLRecord, and that is why I wanted to get the same example to work on 11g.
The alternative of passing a parameter through with InteractionSpecs, is an interesting though can not solve this problem. I don't have a problem with the javax.resource.cci.Record, I can determine the implementation of that in the conversion class it self.
The problem is the XMLRecord generated by the Oracle SOA Adapter Framework, some how I need a way to influence that to generate the correct implementation of the XMLRecord.
So your post is certainly helpfull if I was not trying to get this specific problem to work :).
But I am afraid that I will end up in implementing your sugestion.
Regards
Maikel.
Edited by: M. Dierdorp on 13-aug-2010 6:34

BC/Muse syncing issue with third-party code

Hi there, I was hoping someone had a solution to this issue - which is this:
I have used some third party code for a Hotel's 'QuickBook' function on every page. Periodically, this code stops working on some pages, and works on others - mainly when I republish the site via Muse.
I asked the code's developer to look at it and they found this problem:
<form method="post" action="http://fe.avvio.com/convert/site/Clandeboye%20Lodge/index.php" id="c5QuickBook3Fields"></form>
The form effectively begins and ends on the same line.
However, the </form> appears on a completely different line in the code - rather than the wrong place (as indicated above) it appears in excatly the correct place. Does BC 'render' this either in the wrong place, or doesn't recognise it being there at all?
As a temporary fix: When I log into BC and edit the website from the back end, all I have to do is navigate to the offending page where the QuickBook rests, click 'Update' without making any changes at all and it begins working again.
As a workaround this is obvioulsy a bit of a chore, but more importantly it's impossible to tell when, or on what page, this third party code decides not to work!
It's worth pointing out that the third party code seems to be fine - I've had it looked over and it does in fact work continuously on competitor websites I've been checking.
Apologies if it doesn't make sense... honestly, it has me baffled. I might even have to re-word this at a later stage!
Thanks for any help though.

If you have the entire iTunes folder from the old system and have restored this into <User's Music> on the new one then iTunes should treat this as the "home" library for the device. It should sync without removing any content. If not, see Recover your iTunes library from your iPod or iOS device.
I suspect the options are greyed out because there are currently no Tones in the iTunes library to sync.
tt2

Anyone else having issues with third party routers...

Last week I started having issues with my Asus RT-N66U where certain wireless devices e.g. PS3, Xbox 360, Laptop, etc. have issues connecting to the internet (the PS3 reporting a DNS issue) even after I replaced it with a second rt-n66u.
I then tried using the HH3 I got with BT and have none of these problems.
Back on the Asus I tried a manual DNS (BTs 62.6.40.178 and 62.6.40.162) but these are having issues as well although strangely it will work fine if I use it purely as a wireless access point via the HH3 (With HH3's internal wifi disabled), right now I'm testing it again with Google's DNS but I want to know, is anyone else having any issues?

Is your firmware up to date? http://support.asus.com/Download.aspx?SLanguage=en&m=RT-N66U+%28VER.B1%29&os=8

Issues with Third party program RPURME00

Hi Guys,
SAP has introduced this new program that replaces previous two during third party however on running it saysthat pernr is skipped and nothing gets evaluated and stored.
Any information on this will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Gajanan

The [Note 1051764 - GEN: Skip employee for 3PR evaluation|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1051764] may help you.
Regards,
Raymond

What is a good third party display to use with the Mac Mini?

The Acer monitor I bought simply doesn't work with my first generation Mac-Mini. When connected to the VGA connection I get a "input not supported" message. When I connect the DVI, the screen blacks out when I scroll and then comes back, at first I thought it was just with Firefox but soon discovered it was with any application I used. After some research on the internet I discovered that there is a problem with the firmware design on the DVI's on Acer Monitors. My new Acer monitor is enjoying it's new home in my sisters office, on her desk, connected to the VGA plug on her computer, enjoying Windows XP.
At another web site for the Mac-Mini I was told that there are not that many displays that work for the Mac-Mini and I would be better off purchasing an Apple display, only problem is that the Apple displays are not within my budget. I would like some suggestions on this board from users as to what third party displays they use with a first generation Mac-Mini? I'm looking in the budget range of $200 to $250 dollars. I have a first generation Mac-Mini, Mac OS X Panther.
PS I have tried setting monitor resolutions using both the VGA and DVI plug, they don't work.
Thank you for any help I receive.

Charles,
I cannot speak on behalf of hooking this model of monitor up to a mini, however I do have a 19" Planar monitor at home hooked up to an old G4 tower via VGA, and the 19" Planar monitor that I have at work is hooked up via digital to my G4 15" PowerBook. I love both of these Planar 19" LCD monitors, and have absolutely no complaints. Planar's three year warranty is nice, and their tech support is top notch. I had an issue with the monitor at work, and I had a replacement on my desk in two days. Returning the bad monitor in the pre-paid box that the new one came in made things effortless. We have a few Planar's in the school district that I work in, and have no major issues with any of them.
Not too sure what the most recent pricing is on this model, but CDW was selling them for around $225-$230 delivered right to your door.
Hope this helps.

SGD with Third Party Authentication issue

Hi
I am trying to setup SGD with Third Party Authentication and have done all the requisites for this.
I input the SGD URL and get the Third Party Login page but after I input my credentials, I get redirected to the SGD default login page which should not be the case. I had already set "Tomcat Authentication" as false in server.xml and enabled the Third Party authentication scheme in Array Manger
What else am I missing ?
Kindly advise
SGD ver4.31
Thanks

Every now and then I have found the same. One thing that almost always solved the problem was recreating a new trusted user, you can follow the steps from:
[http://docs.sun.com/source/820-1088/trusted_users.html|http://docs.sun.com/source/820-1088/trusted_users.html]
Especially the step to test the trusted_user is a very good test to see if the trusted user is ok: http://server/axis/services/rpc/externalauth
When prompted, log in as the trusted user.
An other way to test it is via the api-test functionality: http://server/sgd/admin/apitest/
First setup a session: webtopsession->startSession(0)
Then authenticate via externalauth->setSessionIdentity
These steps are the minimal steps to perform 3rdParty Authentication
(There is also an example jsp for 3rd Party Authentication on the wikis.sun: [http://wikis.sun.com/display/SecureGlobalDesktop/Single+sign-on+(before+4.40)|http://wikis.sun.com/display/SecureGlobalDesktop/Single+sign-on+(before+4.40)] )
- Remold

Compatibility issues with CS5.5 and Maverick 10.9

I'd like to know if there are any compatibility issues with CS5.5 and Maverick 10.9 before I upgrade from 10.6.8.

To be honest, I use the CS5 Premium Creative Suite and have had to upgrade all my app's to Mavericks because I have a new iMac, the other one just died.
I used the 'Time Machine' to backup and to transfer all the files, the Mac apps almost transferred 100% but not all successfully, especially iDVD, it was probably something that I did not click in the 'Time Machine preferences'.
If I had the choice, upgrade to 'Mountain Lion, I would revert back to Mountain Lion but not got the discs, I find Mavericks very clunky and slow and causing lots of issues with my Adobe applications.
So if it is not too late, I would wait a few months before upgrading to Mavericks.
Hope this info' has helped.

Are there ANY compatibility issues with Itunes 12.0.1 and Mavericks? Don't want to download Yosemite. Not hearing good things about it.

Are there ANY compatibility issues with Itunes 12.0.1 and Mavericks? Don't want to download Yosemite. Not hearing good things about it. I'm on Mavericks 10.9.5.

one obstacle, quickly removed. thank you.
nomenclature aside for a moment, 10.6.8 is correct but maybe more is necessary about the MacBook Pro: it is 'old': Identifier: 1.2, Intel Core Duo, 2.16 GHz, 1 Processor, L2 2 MB, RAM 2 GB.
i hope that is enough to get an answer to this: is it unadvisable to update its OS; in other words, if i update to 10.9, will the machine be able to handle it, 'speedwise'?

Canon pixma mx922 compatibility issues with Mavericks?

Thinking of getting canon pixma mx922. Any body had compatibility issues with Mavericks?

Go to http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3669 for a list of printers that are still supported.
If you don't see the printer, check Printer software no longer available through Software Update.

I want to upgrade to Mavericks 10.9.3. Are there compatibility issues with Adobe CS6 ? Thanks

want to upgrade to Mavericks 10.9.3. Are there compatibility issues with Adobe CS6 ? Thanks

Go to roaringapps.com/apps?index=a and look that specific product up.
(108251)

Mavericks compatibility issues with third party displays

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for